Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• DHS Secretary Kristi Noem revokes Harvard's Foreign Exchange Student Program — DHS Secretary Kristi Noem sent a letter to Harvard University revoking their Foreign Exchange Student Program effective immediately, preventing the enrollment of additional foreign students and requiring current students to transfer or leave the country. This action follows Harvard's failure to comply with reporting requirements requested by Noem. Legal challenges are expected in federal court in Boston.
• Trump Administration Revokes Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students — The Trump administration revoked Harvard University's ability to enroll international students, citing alleged anti-American activities. This decision affects thousands of students and raises concerns about academic freedom and international education.

Supporting reports

• Cuts to healthcare for 9/11 first responders reported — Reports indicate that cuts to a program funding healthcare for first responders and survivors of the September 11 attacks have left many patients uncertain about their cancer treatment coverage.
• Cuts to IRS enforcement budget announced — The Trump administration announced a 31% cut to the enforcement wing of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which is expected to exacerbate tax evasion among high earners, costing the government approximately $700 billion annually.
• Cuts to USAID contracts reported — The Trump administration's cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) are projected to result in approximately $2 billion less in contracts for American farmers and leave food that could feed millions rotting in government warehouses.
• Trump administration cuts grants for Harvard University — The Trump administration cut an additional $450 million in grants for Harvard University, expanding a lawsuit by the school against the administration for violating proper procedures and First Amendment rights.
• Trump administration cuts federal grants to Harvard University — The Trump administration cut off federal grants to Harvard University over allegations of racial discrimination against white and Asian individuals. This action is part of a broader initiative to address perceived discrimination in hiring and admissions practices at the university.

Supporting reports

• Newark Mayor Ras Baraka Arrested — Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested by federal agents after a confrontation outside the Delaney Hall ICE detention center. Baraka was participating in a peaceful protest and attempting to assert local jurisdiction over an ICE operation he claimed violated city law. The arrest occurred after tensions escalated when ICE agents blocked his access during a scheduled visit with members of Congress. The arrest has been described as an act of intimidation by Rep. Robert Menendez Jr., who was present at the scene.
• Arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka by ICE Officials — On May 9, 2025, Ras Baraka, the mayor of Newark and a Democratic candidate for governor, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials outside Delaney Hall, an immigration detention center in New Jersey. The arrest occurred during a visit by Baraka and three Democratic Congress members, who were inspecting the facility. The Congress members accused ICE officials of creating a confrontation that led to Baraka's arrest. ICE officials claimed the Congress members staged a political stunt and threatened to arrest them as well.
• Mayor of Newark Ras Baraka arrested at ICE detention center protest — On May 9, 2025, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested for alleged trespass at an ICE detention center in Newark, New Jersey. Baraka, who opposes the facility's construction due to permit issues, was detained after a confrontation with federal officials. The arrest occurred during a protest against the detention center, which Baraka and other Democratic politicians argue was opened without necessary permits. Baraka was released after several hours, and his wife accused the government of targeting him. The incident has sparked criticism of ICE's actions and raised concerns about federal overreach.

Supporting reports

• Appeal filed — Grundmann v. Trump et al . (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00425 — Defendants appealed Judge Sooknanan's March 12 order granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment to the D.C. Circuit.
• Case update — State of California v. Trump (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-03372 — Defendants replied in support of their motion to transfer the case to the U.S. Court of International Trade.
• Case update — Svitlana Doe v. Noem (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10495 — Defendants petitioned the Supreme Court for an emergency stay.
• Case update — V.M.L. v. Harper (W.D. La.) 1:25-cv-00550 — The parties submitted a joint stipulation of dismissal .
• Motion to dismiss decided — American Federation of Gov’t Employees, AFL-CIO v. Ezell (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10276 — Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — American Association of University Professors v. United States Department of Justice (S.D.N.Y.) 1:25-cv-02429 — Plaintiffs filed a reply memorandum in support of their motion for a preliminary injunction, arguing that they have standing, that the Court has jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs' statutory and constitutional claims, that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits and will suffer irreparable harm without relief, and that the balance of equities and public interest support granting preliminary injunctive relief.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Gober v. Collins (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00714 — Judge Rudolph Contreras denied Plaintiffs' preliminary injunction motion.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01270 — Plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, requesting that the court order Defendants not to take any further actions to to dissolve or cease the statutory functions of CRCL, OIDO, or the CIS Ombudsman's Office; reverse work stoppages that were ordered for the DHS Oversight Offices; and enjoin Defendants from effectuating reduction-in-force scheduled for May 23, 2025.
• Summary judgment ruling — Oregon v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Ct. Intl. Trade) 1:25-cv-00077 — Judge Gary Katzmann ordered that Plaintiffs' preliminary injunction motion be construed as a motion for summary judgment.
• Case update — Project on Government Oversight, Inc. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00527 — Plaintiff filed an amended complaint , which included additional facts about DOGE's March 25, 2025 records retention policy. Plaintiff added a request that this policy also be deemed arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law.
• Complaint filed — D.N.N. v. Liggins — A complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in the case of D.N.N. v. Liggins, under docket number 1:25-cv-01613. The details of the case are not yet available, but it involves litigation related to actions taken during the Trump administration. This filing marks the initiation of a legal challenge that could impact judicial review and the enforcement of rights.
• Motion denied — State of California v. Trump (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10810 — The court denied the transfer, stating that “the differences between the matters counsel against consolidation”, that the interests of justice do not favor transfer, and that a stay is not warranted.
• Motion denied — W.M.M. v. Trump (a.k.a. A.A.R.P. v. Trump) (N.D. Tex.) 1:25-cv-00059 — Judge Hendrix denied class certification.
• Motion to dismiss decided — American Bar Association v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01263 — Defendants filed a reply in support of the motion to dismiss.
• Motion to dismiss decided — Amica Center for Immigrant Rights et al. v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00298 — Plaintiffs filed a memorandum in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, refuting Defendants' claims and arguing that the court does have jurisdiction, that the Programs' termination is reviewable and that all of Plaintiffs' claims are viable.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — City and County of San Francisco v. Donald J. Trump, et al (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-01350 — Judge Orrick clarified that Defendants could not use EO 14287 or other Government action that postdates the preliminary injunction as a workaround to the preliminary injunction order. The preliminary injunction order should be read to apply to “any Executive Order or agency directive that purports to attempt to cut off federal funding from States or localities that meet the Government's definition of ‘Sanctuary' jurisdiction” in the “unconstitutional manner threatened by [EOs 14159 and 14218].”
• Preliminary injunction ruling — NAACP v. U.S. Department of Education (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01120 — Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint , which added new factual detail about the alleged harm, including stories from specific school districts that had rescinded their diversity and equity policies before reinstating them pursuant to the court's preliminary injunction. The requested relief remained the same, and the NAACP renewed its prayer for the court to find that the TItle VI Documents are unconstitutional, in violation of the APA, and outside the scope of any existing statutory authority.
• Summary judgment ruling — Amica Center for Immigrant Rights et al. v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00298 — Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment and opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and request for preliminary injunctive relief. They argue that the court lacks jurisdiction, that the APA claims fail for independent threshold reasons, and that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment. Further, they argue that any preliminary relief is unwarranted and if granted should be limited in scope.
• Summary judgment ruling — Harper v. Bessent (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01294 — Defendants filed a cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.
• Summary judgment ruling — Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D.D.C.) 1:24-cv-01702 — The court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment as well as granting in part and denying in part Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment. In so doing, the Court ordered that the Biden-era Final Rule's limitation on asylum eligibility be vacated and set aside, that the Final Rule's manifestation of fear requirements be vacated and set aside, that the four-hour consultation window in the Guidance be vacated and set aside, that the provisions of the Final Rule not mentioned in the Order remain in effect and that the individual Plaintiffs' removal orders and negative credible fear determinations be vacated.

Supporting reports

• Trump Administration Blocks Grant Funding for Harvard — The Trump administration, through Education Secretary Linda McMahon, has informed Harvard University that it will no longer receive federal research grants and aid unless it complies with a list of demands. This decision follows Harvard's rejection of demands from the administration's antisemitism taskforce, which were prompted by campus protests against Israel's military actions in Gaza. The administration has already frozen $2.2 billion in funding and threatened to freeze an additional $1 billion, while also considering revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status. Harvard has filed a lawsuit against the government, citing severe impacts on research and education.

Supporting reports

• Threat of arrest against Wisconsin governor — Trump’s "border czar," Tom Homan, threatened Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers with arrest after Evers issued a memo advising state workers to consult a lawyer before complying with Immigration and Customs Enforcement requests. Evers defended his actions, stating he did not direct anyone to break the law.

Supporting reports

• Trump Administration to Revoke Harvard's Tax-Exempt Status — On May 2, 2025, Trump announced on Truth Social that his administration will revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status, claiming "It's what they deserve!" This move targets the university's financial standing and independence.

Supporting reports

• Trump Administration Agrees to Halt School Funding Freeze in Maine — The Trump administration has agreed to halt its efforts to freeze funds for a child nutrition program in Maine, following a settlement with the state. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) had previously suspended these funds after Maine refused to comply with demands to bar transgender girls from participating in girls' sports. Maine had sued the USDA to maintain its funding, and the lawsuit was dropped in exchange for the restoration of funds. The settlement ensures that the USDA will not interfere with Maine's access to funds without following legal procedures.
• Dismissal entered — Maine v. US Department of Agriculture (D. Me.) 1:25-cv-00131 — Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action with prejudice.
• Trump Administration Settles with Maine Over Child Nutrition Program — The Trump administration reached a settlement with Maine, restoring federal funds for a state child nutrition program previously frozen due to Maine's trans athlete policies. Maine agreed to drop its lawsuit against the Department of Agriculture.

Supporting reports

• Trump Administration Sues Michigan and Hawaii Over Climate Laws — The Trump administration sued Michigan and Hawaii to stop them from filing lawsuits against major oil companies for their role in the climate crisis. This legal action challenges state-level environmental accountability efforts.
• Trump Administration Sues States Over Climate Lawsuits — The Trump administration sued Michigan and Hawaii to prevent them from filing lawsuits against major oil companies for their role in the climate crisis. This legal action challenges state efforts to hold companies accountable for environmental damage.
• DoJ Sues States to Block Climate Litigation Against Oil Companies — The U.S. Department of Justice has filed lawsuits against Michigan and Hawaii to prevent them from pursuing legal action against oil companies for their role in the climate crisis. The Justice Department claims that the Clean Air Act displaces states' authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions beyond their borders. This move is part of the Trump administration's broader strategy to halt climate accountability lawsuits, which it deems unconstitutional. The legal action has been met with condemnation from officials in the targeted states.

Supporting reports

• Trump signs executive order targeting sanctuary cities — On April 28, 2025, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the attorney general and the secretary of homeland security to publish a list of state and local jurisdictions that obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws, commonly known as "sanctuary cities." The order also calls for identifying federal funds that can be terminated for these jurisdictions. This move is part of Trump's broader immigration policy efforts to penalize sanctuary cities by cutting off federal funding.
• Executive Order: Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens — On April 28, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled "Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens." The order directs the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify and publish a list of "sanctuary jurisdictions" that obstruct federal immigration law enforcement. It mandates federal agencies to consider suspending or terminating federal funds to these jurisdictions. The order also calls for the development of mechanisms to prevent federal benefits from being provided to aliens in sanctuary jurisdictions and seeks to ensure equal treatment of American citizens over aliens in legal matters.
• Trump Signs Executive Order Targeting Sanctuary Cities — On April 28, 2025, Trump signed an executive order threatening to cut federal funding from sanctuary cities and jurisdictions that "obstruct the enforcement of Federal immigration laws." This order is part of the administration's broader immigration enforcement strategy.
• Trump Requires List of Sanctuary Cities and States — On April 28, 2025, President Trump signed executive orders targeting "sanctuary cities" and strengthening law enforcement against "criminals." The orders call for a list of jurisdictions obstructing federal immigration laws and support for officers facing legal costs from official duties.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration sues Maine over transgender athletes in school sports — The Department of Justice, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, filed a lawsuit against Maine on Wednesday for allowing transgender girls to compete in school sports. The suit seeks a court order to stop the policy, strip titles from transgender athletes, and potentially claw back federal funding. This escalates an ongoing confrontation in which the administration has threatened to withhold Maine's $250 million K-12 education budget and freeze school lunch funding—moves temporarily blocked by a federal judge. Maine's governor and legal team have rejected the administration's interpretation of Title IX and vowed to fight in court.
• Justice Department sues Maine Department of Education — The Justice Department sued Maine's Department of Education over the state's policy allowing transgender girls to participate in girls' sports. Attorney General Pam Bondi threatened to pull past federal funding retroactively. Governor Mills stated the administration is trying "to pressure the State of Maine to ignore the Constitution and abandon the rule of law."
• Trump Criticizes Maine Governor Over Education Funding — President Trump criticized Maine Governor Janet Mills for her refusal to comply with his demands regarding transgender athletes, warning that the state would lose federal education funding. Mills has maintained that she will adhere to state law, which protects against discrimination based on gender identity.
• Trump Demands Maine Governor Ban Transgender Participation in Sports — President Trump demanded that Maine Governor Janet Mills prohibit transgender girls from participating in girls' sports, threatening to withhold federal education funding if she does not comply. Mills has stated that she will follow state law, which protects against discrimination based on gender identity, and has indicated a willingness to challenge the federal government in court.
• Justice Department Sues Maine Over Transgender Sports Policy — The Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Maine's Department of Education, seeking to enforce a ban on transgender girls participating in girls' sports. This legal action follows threats from the Trump administration to cut federal funding for education in the state unless the ban is implemented.
• Trump administration threatens to withhold federal education and school lunch funding from Maine — The Trump administration has threatened to withhold Maine's entire $250 million K-12 education budget contribution and freeze school lunch funding in retaliation for the state's refusal to bar transgender girls from female school sports teams. A federal judge temporarily blocked these funding cuts after Maine filed its own lawsuit. The administration claims Maine violates Title IX; Maine's legal team disputes this interpretation and refuses to sign a settlement implementing the restrictions.

Supporting reports

• Reinvigorating America's Beautiful Clean Coal Industry and Amending Executive Order 14241 — President Trump signed Executive Order 14260 on April 8, 2025, directing the Attorney General to identify all state and local laws, regulations, and causes of action burdening domestic energy development—particularly those addressing climate change, environmental justice, carbon emissions, or ESG initiatives—that the administration deems unconstitutional, preempted by federal law, or otherwise unenforceable. The order instructs the Attorney General to expeditiously stop enforcement of such laws and submit a report within 60 days recommending additional presidential or legislative action.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14260 directing Attorney General to identify and challenge state energy and climate laws as unconstitutional or preempted. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14262 on April 8, 2025, invoking emergency authority under the Federal Power Act to address electricity demand surge from AI data centers and manufacturing. The order directs the Secretary of Energy to streamline Department of Energy processes for issuing orders under section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, develop a uniform reserve-margin methodology within 30 days, and establish protocols to identify and retain generation resources critical to system reliability. The order authorizes DOE to prevent generation resources exceeding 50 megawatts from leaving the bulk-power system or converting fuel sources if such conversion would reduce accredited generating capacity.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14262 directing DOE to streamline emergency authority for electric grid reliability and develop reserve-margin methodology to retain generation resources. — On April 8, 2025, President Trump signed a series of executive orders designed to permit and expand coal plant construction. The orders are cited in the climate petition as part of the broader pattern of federal fossil fuel promotion that the young activists argue violates international human rights obligations. The orders exemplify the Trump administration's pro-fossil fuel regulatory posture.
• Trump signs executive orders to expand coal plant construction — President Trump signed an executive order on April 8, 2025, directing the Secretary of Energy to streamline Department of Energy processes for issuing emergency orders under the Federal Power Act to maintain electric grid reliability during supply interruptions. The order requires the Secretary to develop a uniform methodology for analyzing reserve margins across all bulk power system regions within 30 days, establish protocols to identify critical generation resources, and prevent generation resources exceeding 50 megawatts from leaving the grid or converting fuel sources if doing so would reduce accredited capacity. The order invokes emergency authority under a prior national energy emergency declaration.
• Trump issued executive order directing energy secretary to streamline grid reliability protocols and prevent power plant retirements. — President Trump issued Executive Order "Protecting American Energy From State Overreach" on April 8, 2025, directing the Attorney General to identify and challenge state and local laws regulating energy production, with particular focus on climate-related policies. The order characterizes state climate regulations—citing New York's climate liability law, Vermont's emissions penalties, and California's carbon cap system—as unconstitutional or preempted by federal law. The Attorney General is instructed to take "expeditious" action to stop enforcement of identified state laws and report within 60 days on actions taken and recommendations for additional presidential or legislative measures.
• Trump issues executive order directing DOJ to challenge state energy regulations — President Trump signed an executive order on April 8, 2025, designating coal as a "mineral" under Executive Order 14241 and directing federal agencies to remove regulatory barriers to coal production, expedite coal leasing on federal lands, and promote coal exports and use in electricity generation and steel production. The order requires the Departments of Interior, Agriculture, and Energy to assess coal resources on federal lands within 60 days and instructs multiple agencies to identify and revise policies that discourage coal investment.
• Trump issues executive order to reinvigorate coal industry and amend mineral production directive — President Trump signed Executive Order 14260 on April 8, 2025, directing the Attorney General to identify all state and local laws, regulations, and policies that burden domestic energy development—particularly those addressing climate change, environmental justice, carbon emissions, or ESG initiatives—and to take action to stop their enforcement. The order characterizes such state laws as unconstitutional, preempted, or otherwise unenforceable, citing concerns about energy costs, national security, and federalism. The Attorney General must report within 60 days on actions taken and recommend additional presidential or legislative measures.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14260 directing the Attorney General to identify and challenge state energy regulations as unconstitutional or preempted federal law. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14262 on April 8, 2025, directing the Secretary of Energy to streamline Department of Energy processes for issuing orders under the Federal Power Act during grid emergencies, develop a methodology to identify regions with low reserve margins, and establish protocols to retain generation resources identified as critical to system reliability. The order states it aims to address electricity demand from AI data centers and manufacturing. Section 3(c) authorizes the Secretary to prevent generation resources over 50 megawatts from leaving the bulk-power system or converting fuel sources if such conversion would reduce accredited generating capacity.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14262 directing emergency streamlining of energy generation approvals and retention of coal and fossil fuel plants. — The White House published a fact sheet on April 8, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump that day. The order directs the Secretary of Energy to streamline emergency processes under the Federal Power Act, develop a uniform methodology to analyze reserve margins across bulk power regions, and prevent critical generation resources from leaving the grid or converting fuel sources if doing so would reduce accredited generating capacity. The fact sheet frames the order as a response to rising electricity demand from AI data centers and manufacturing.
• White House issued fact sheet promoting executive order on electric grid reliability and security — The White House published a fact sheet on April 8, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump directing the Attorney General to identify and challenge state laws and policies that burden domestic energy production. The order states it targets laws addressing climate change, environmental justice, carbon emissions, and carbon taxes. The fact sheet claims state policies in New York, Vermont, and California raise energy prices and disrupt supply. The Attorney General is directed to submit a report within 60 days detailing actions taken and recommendations.
• White House issued fact sheet promoting executive order on state energy regulation — The White House signed Executive Order 14261 on April 8, 2025, directing federal agencies to remove regulatory barriers to coal production, designate coal as a "mineral" under prior executive order, assess coal resources on federal lands, expedite coal leasing, lift mining barriers, identify and revise policies discouraging coal investment, promote coal exports, expand categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act for coal projects, and accelerate coal technology development. The order states coal is "essential to our national and economic security" and directs the Secretary of Interior to terminate the "Jewell Moratorium" on coal leasing.
• White House signed Executive Order 14261 to reinvigorate coal industry and amend Executive Order 14241 — President Trump issued Proclamation 10914 on April 8, 2025, exempting certain coal-fired electricity generation facilities from compliance with the EPA's May 2024 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule revision for a two-year period (July 8, 2027–July 8, 2029). The proclamation invokes section 112(i)(4) of the Clean Air Act and asserts that required emissions-control technology does not exist in commercially viable form and that the exemption serves national security and energy security interests. The exemption delays compliance obligations, reverting affected sources to pre-2024 MATS standards during the exemption window.
• Trump proclamation exempts coal-fired power plants from EPA emissions standards for two years. — On April 8, 2025, Trump signed four executive orders aimed at reviving the coal industry. He used emergency authority to allow older coal-fired power plants scheduled for retirement to continue producing electricity, claiming this is needed to meet increased energy demands from datacenters, AI, and electric cars. The order "slashes unnecessary regulations that targeted the beautiful, clean coal." Coal is the dirtiest fossil fuel and its usage has long been in decline.
• Trump signed four executive orders reviving coal industry — President Trump signed a proclamation on April 8, 2025, exempting certain coal-fired electricity generation facilities from compliance with the EPA's 2024 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) amendments for a two-year period (July 8, 2027 to July 8, 2029). The proclamation asserts that the required emissions-control technologies do not exist in commercially viable form and claims the exemption is necessary for national security, grid reliability, and energy security. The exemption delays compliance obligations that would otherwise take effect in 2027.
• Trump issued proclamation exempting coal-fired power plants from EPA emissions standards for two years — The White House published a fact sheet on April 8, 2025, promoting an executive order signed by President Trump that day. The order directs agencies to designate coal as a "mineral" under prior executive authority, lift barriers to coal mining on federal lands, rescind policies favoring transition away from coal, and promote coal exports and use in steel production and AI data centers. The fact sheet claims the coal industry supports hundreds of thousands of jobs and adds tens of billions annually to the economy.
• White House issued fact sheet promoting executive order on coal industry — The White House published a fact sheet on April 8, 2025, describing a proclamation signed by President Trump granting two years of relief from the Biden-era Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule to certain coal-fired power plants. The fact sheet states the proclamation allows affected plants to comply with a less stringent version of the EPA standard, claims this prevents premature plant closures, and asserts the measure protects energy grid stability and national security. The document characterizes the Biden-era rule as imposing "unattainable compliance requirements" and "commercially unviable" emissions-control technologies.
• White House issues fact sheet on EPA coal plant emissions relief proclamation — Trump said that some law firms that agreed to provide pro bono services to the administration will be working with coal companies on "leasing and other things." He also bragged about the agreements with the firms, saying "they give me a lot of money considering they've done nothing wrong." Trump has targeted or threatened law firms that partnered with or represented his political enemies, claiming they have "weaponized" the legal system.
• Trump said law firms will work with coal companies — President Trump signed four executive orders on Tuesday aimed at reviving coal production and allowing older coal-fired power plants scheduled for retirement to continue operating. The orders direct federal agencies to end policies discriminating against coal, impose a moratorium on Biden-era climate protections for coal plants, promote coal as a "secure" energy source, and instruct the Justice Department to investigate state policies that disadvantage coal. The administration framed the move as addressing rising electricity demand from datacenters, AI, and electric vehicles, though environmental groups criticized it as economically backward.
• Trump signs four executive orders to revive coal industry and allow retirement-scheduled plants to remain operational

Supporting reports

• Trump signed Executive Order 14260 directing Attorney General to identify and challenge state energy and climate laws as unconstitutional or preempted. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14260 on April 8, 2025, directing the Attorney General to identify all state and local laws, regulations, and causes of action burdening domestic energy development—particularly those addressing climate change, environmental justice, carbon emissions, or ESG initiatives—that the administration deems unconstitutional, preempted by federal law, or otherwise unenforceable. The order instructs the Attorney General to expeditiously stop enforcement of such laws and submit a report within 60 days recommending additional presidential or legislative action.
• Trump directs DOJ to stop enforcement of state climate laws — President Trump issued an executive order instructing the Department of Justice to cease enforcement of state climate laws, specifically targeting New York and Vermont's "climate superfund" laws requiring fossil fuel companies to pay for climate disaster damages. The order characterizes these state policies as unconstitutional and irreconcilable with the administration's energy agenda. Trump also targeted lawsuits brought by states, cities, and counties against oil companies for climate damages, framing them as obstacles to energy independence.
• Trump signed executive order stopping enforcement of state climate laws — On April 8, 2025, Trump signed an executive order instructing the Department of Justice to "stop the enforcement" of state climate laws, which his administration suggested are unconstitutional or unenforceable. The order states "These State laws and policies are fundamentally irreconcilable with my Administration's objective to unleash American energy. They should not stand." The action represents Trump's attempt to preempt state climate initiatives.
• Trump issues executive order directing DOJ to challenge state energy regulations — President Trump issued Executive Order "Protecting American Energy From State Overreach" on April 8, 2025, directing the Attorney General to identify and challenge state and local laws regulating energy production, with particular focus on climate-related policies. The order characterizes state climate regulations—citing New York's climate liability law, Vermont's emissions penalties, and California's carbon cap system—as unconstitutional or preempted by federal law. The Attorney General is instructed to take "expeditious" action to stop enforcement of identified state laws and report within 60 days on actions taken and recommendations for additional presidential or legislative measures.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14260 directing the Attorney General to identify and challenge state energy regulations as unconstitutional or preempted federal law. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14260 on April 8, 2025, directing the Attorney General to identify all state and local laws, regulations, and policies that burden domestic energy development—particularly those addressing climate change, environmental justice, carbon emissions, or ESG initiatives—and to take action to stop their enforcement. The order characterizes such state laws as unconstitutional, preempted, or otherwise unenforceable, citing concerns about energy costs, national security, and federalism. The Attorney General must report within 60 days on actions taken and recommend additional presidential or legislative measures.
• White House issued fact sheet promoting executive order on state energy regulation — The White House published a fact sheet on April 8, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump directing the Attorney General to identify and challenge state laws and policies that burden domestic energy production. The order states it targets laws addressing climate change, environmental justice, carbon emissions, and carbon taxes. The fact sheet claims state policies in New York, Vermont, and California raise energy prices and disrupt supply. The Attorney General is directed to submit a report within 60 days detailing actions taken and recommendations.

Supporting reports

• Trump signed executive order stopping enforcement of state climate laws — On April 8, 2025, Trump signed an executive order instructing the Department of Justice to "stop the enforcement" of state climate laws, which his administration suggested are unconstitutional or unenforceable. The order states "These State laws and policies are fundamentally irreconcilable with my Administration's objective to unleash American energy. They should not stand." The action represents Trump's attempt to preempt state climate initiatives.
• Trump administration freezes $790 million in federal funding to Northwestern University — The Trump administration froze $790 million in federal funding to Northwestern University as part of broader crackdowns on students and faculty members across US colleges who have expressed opposition to Israel's military operations in Gaza. The freeze targeted the university in response to activism and legal representation related to pro-Palestinian causes.
• White House freezes federal funding for Cornell and Northwestern universities — The Trump administration froze over $1 billion in federal funding for Cornell University and $790 million for Northwestern University, citing investigations into alleged "failure to protect Jewish students" following pro-Palestinian campus protests. The freeze includes grants and contracts from federal departments of health, education, agriculture, and defense. Cornell received over 75 stop-work orders from the Department of Defense affecting research in defense, cybersecurity, health, and cancer. The action follows warning letters sent to 60 universities in early March and comes after Cornell's president published a defiant op-ed defending academic freedom and free discourse.
• Princeton University reports suspension of federal research grants — Princeton University announced that dozens of its federal research grants were suspended over allegations that the university promoted antisemitism. This action follows similar defunding threats against Columbia and Harvard, representing a coordinated campaign against major research institutions.
• Trump administration announces cancellation of $400 million in grants and loans to Columbia University — The Trump administration announced the cancellation of $400 million in grants and loans to Columbia University, alleging the school failed to protect students from antisemitic harassment. In response, Columbia officials capitulated to a series of changes demanded by federal officials, sparking outrage from advocates and prompting at least one prominent academic to leave the institution.
• Trump administration announces plan to review $9 billion in Harvard University contracts and grants — The Trump administration announced a plan to review approximately $9 billion in contracts and multiyear grants to Harvard University over accusations that the university failed to protect Jewish students and promoted "divisive ideologies over free inquiry." The action follows the defunding of Columbia University and represents escalating pressure on major research institutions.
• Trump administration considers consent decree to place Columbia University under federal control — The Trump administration is reportedly considering placing Columbia University under a legally binding consent decree, a dramatic escalation following the university's acceptance of administration-demanded changes as a condition for restoring $400 million in suspended federal grants and contracts. The proposal originates from the administration's antisemitism taskforce, composed partly of Justice Department lawyers who question Columbia's good faith compliance. If Columbia resists, the Justice Department would need to present its case in court, risking prolonged litigation and continued funding withholding.
• Trump administration freezes nearly $1 billion in federal funding from Cornell University — During a cabinet meeting, President Trump pressed Education Secretary Linda McMahon on withholding federal funds from universities deemed "not behaving." McMahon confirmed the administration has frozen nearly $1 billion in funding from Cornell University and is investigating multiple institutions while holding back grant money pending compliance discussions with university presidents.
• Trump administration pauses $175 million in federal funding to University of Pennsylvania — The Trump administration paused $175 million in federal funding to the University of Pennsylvania over its inclusion of transgender athletes in women's college sports. This action represents another instance of defunding universities over policies the administration opposes.
• Trump administration demands Harvard surrender academic freedoms; Harvard refuses; administration retaliates by freezing $2.2bn in grants — The Trump administration (Departments of Education, HHS, and GSA) issued an 11 April demand letter to Harvard University president Alan Garber requiring sweeping reforms including installation of "viewpoint-diverse" faculty, elimination of DEI programs, and adoption of specific antisemitism definitions as conditions for continued federal funding. Harvard's legal team, citing First Amendment violations and constitutional limits on executive authority, rejected the demands as governmental overreach into academic freedom. Within hours, the administration froze $2.2bn in grants and a $60m contract in retaliation.
• Trump administration withheld Harvard University federal funding pending government control of admissions and intellectual content — On April 11, the Trump administration announced it would withhold $2.2 billion in grants already awarded and a $60 million contract from Harvard University unless the university permitted the federal government to control its admissions and intellectual content. The administration framed the action as addressing antisemitism. On April 22, Harvard filed suit against the departments of Health and Human Services, Justice, Education, Energy, and Defense, the General Services Administration, the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, NASA, and their leaders, alleging violation of the First Amendment and abuse of legal authority.
• White House claims letter to Harvard withholding federal funds was "unauthorized" — On Friday, April 18, the administration claimed that a letter sent to Harvard University on April 11 withholding federal grants until the university granted administration officials power over the school's students and programs was "unauthorized." However, the White House simultaneously stated it was standing by the letter. The letter was signed by three federal officials, placed on official letterhead, and sent from the email of a senior federal official. Harvard responded by pointing out the letter's official provenance and noting that the government's actions had "real-life consequences."
• Harvard University rejected Trump administration demand for control over university governance — On April 11, 2025, Harvard University rejected the Trump administration's demand to regulate "intellectual and civil rights conditions" at Harvard, including its governance, admissions, programs, and extracurricular activities, in exchange for continuation of $2.2 billion in multiyear grants and a $60 million contract. Harvard's lawyers stated the university would not surrender its independence or relinquish constitutional rights and would not allow itself to be taken over by the federal government.

Supporting reports

• Social Security Administration canceled Maine contracts for newborn Social Security number applications. — Acting Social Security Administration Commissioner Leland Dudek canceled contracts permitting Maine parents to apply for Social Security numbers for newborns from hospitals and for Maine families to report deaths from funeral homes. The action was taken in retaliation after Maine Governor Janet Mills stated the state would follow state and federal law rather than comply with Trump's demands. When informed the change would risk identity theft and wasteful spending, Dudek directed the agency to proceed anyway. After public outcry, Dudek backtracked on the decision.

Supporting reports

• Secretary of Agriculture froze federal funds for Maine educational programs. — Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins announced a freeze on federal funds for Maine educational programs. The action was taken in retaliation against Maine Governor Janet Mills for refusing to comply with Trump administration demands. Rollins stated the administration would stand against "a leftist social agenda," framing the funding freeze as ideological punishment for the state's resistance to federal directives.

Supporting reports

• Trump threatens to cut federal funding over compliance with executive order — During a meeting with governors, President Trump threatened to withhold federal funding from states that do not comply with his executive order banning transgender athletes from competing in girls' sports, prompting a response from Maine Governor Mills that they would see him in court.
• Trump signed executive order banning trans athletes — Former President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning transgender athletes from participating in women's sports. The NCAA announced it would comply with the directive. Maine Governor Janet Mills stated that the decision on player eligibility would be left to individual high school and youth sports league sanctioning bodies in her state.

Supporting reports

• Maine Governor Mills refused Trump's transgender athlete ban at White House governors' conference — At a White House meeting of governors on February 21, President Trump announced an executive order banning transgender student athletes from playing on girls' sports teams. When Trump asked Maine Governor Janet Mills if she would comply, Mills stated she was "complying with state and federal laws." Trump responded that "We are the federal law" and threatened to withhold all federal funding if Maine did not comply. Mills replied, "See you in court."
• Trump administration opened investigations into Maine's policies following governor's defiance — Following the February 21 exchange between Trump and Governor Mills at the White House, the Trump administration opened investigations by the Departments of Education, Health and Human Services, and Agriculture into Maine's policies. The Department of Agriculture temporarily paused funding for the University of Maine before restoring it and clearing the university system of Title IX violations.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration ends NYC congestion pricing approval — The Trump administration announced plans to end federal approval for New York City's congestion pricing program. This decision impacts local transportation policy and raises questions about federal intervention in state and local governance.
• Trump administration orders end to NYC congestion pricing — The Trump administration, through the US Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), has ordered New York City to terminate its congestion pricing program by March 21, 2025. This directive was communicated in a letter from FHWA executive director Gloria Shepherd to New York state and city officials, citing concerns about financial burdens on working-class Americans. The program, which charges drivers a fee to enter Manhattan's central business district, is being challenged by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and a New York bridge authority in court.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration sues New York over immigration policies — On Thursday, the Trump administration, through newly appointed Attorney General Pam Bondi, announced a lawsuit against New York. The federal government accuses state officials of prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens. This legal action is part of a broader crackdown on immigration policies by the Trump administration, which has been met with protests and resistance in New York City. The lawsuit challenges New York's sanctuary laws that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
• US Justice Department sues New York over immigration rules — The US Justice Department, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, has filed a lawsuit against New York State over its "green light" law, which allows individuals to obtain driver's licenses without legal residency. The lawsuit claims the law undermines federal immigration laws and seeks to have it struck down. Bondi criticized the law as prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens and emphasized the Justice Department's commitment to enforcing federal immigration efforts. New York Attorney General James has vowed to defend the state's laws, asserting they protect the rights and safety of New Yorkers.

Supporting reports

• White House issues release asserting enforcement actions against states and entities for non-compliance with Trump administration directives — The White House issued a release titled "Trump Administration: Follow the Law" on February 13, 2025, announcing enforcement actions by multiple federal agencies against states, cities, and entities the administration characterizes as defiant. The release states the Department of Education launched investigations into California and Minnesota athletic organizations over alleged non-compliance with an executive order on girls' sports, and into universities over anti-Semitic harassment; the DOJ sued New York State and filed lawsuits against Illinois and Chicago over immigration and sanctuary policies; the EPA referred matters to inspectors general and DOJ over alleged fund-sheltering by Biden-era staffers; the FCC opened investigations into Comcast, NPR, and PBS, and took action against a San Francisco radio station; and DHS "clawed back" tens of millions in FEMA funds.

Supporting reports

• DoJ sues Chicago and Illinois over sanctuary laws — The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) filed a lawsuit against the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago, accusing them of obstructing the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies. The lawsuit seeks a court order to nullify sanctuary laws that the federal government claims interfere with federal immigration law enforcement. The complaint was filed in a federal court in Chicago, following a national emergency declaration by Donald Trump on his inauguration day. The DoJ aims to prevent these jurisdictions from receiving federal grants if they continue to impede immigration enforcement.

Supporting reports

• DNC intervenes in GOP's ballot challenge case — The Democratic National Committee intervened in the case brought by the RNC and North Carolina GOP, asking a court to block their request to discard thousands of ballots. The DNC cited state and federal laws that protect the votes of eligible voters despite minor registration application issues. This intervention is part of the ongoing legal battle over the 2024 election results in North Carolina.
• RNC and North Carolina GOP join Griffin's ballot challenge — The Republican National Committee, the North Carolina GOP, and the Wake County Republican Party joined Jefferson Griffin's legal challenge, contesting 60,000 ballots in the 2024 election. They argue that the state's voter registration form did not clearly state that providing a driver's license or social security number was mandatory, affecting the validity of these ballots. This legal action is part of a broader effort to contest the election results.
• Trump conditions aid to California on voter ID laws — Former President Donald Trump stated he would not agree to provide federal aid to California unless the state adopted mandatory voter ID laws, which would effectively end mail-in voting. This condition was mentioned during his visit to California to address wildfire relief efforts.
• Trump threatens to withhold wildfire aid from California — President Trump threatened on January 24, 2025, to withhold wildfire aid from California unless the state introduces voter ID requirements and makes changes to water policy. This threat has been criticized as an abuse of federal power and raises concerns about the use of aid as leverage for political gain.