Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Speaker Johnson declined to question Trump's 2020 election claims — Speaker Mike Johnson was asked on NBC whether it is healthy for the country's democracy for the president to be questioning the 2020 election five years later with claims deemed false. Johnson responded by pivoting to "election integrity" and stating "We know there was a lot of irregularity," declining to directly address the president's false claims about a past election.

Supporting reports

• North Carolina Supreme Court temporarily stayed the Court of Appeals ruling — On Monday, April 7, 2025, the North Carolina Supreme Court temporarily stayed the Court of Appeals' ruling that would have invalidated 60,000 ballots to consider Democrat Allison Riggs' appeal. Riggs, who won the November 2024 election and should already be months into her first full term, will recuse herself from the case, leaving Republicans with a 5-1 majority on the court. The stay prevents immediate disenfranchisement of voters while the case proceeds to the state's highest court.
• Jefferson Griffin filed and pursued ballot challenges violating the Purcell principle — Republican Jefferson Griffin, who lost the November 2024 North Carolina Supreme Court election to Democrat Allison Riggs by 734 votes, spent five months attempting to overturn the election by challenging over 60,000 ballots. Griffin recycled arguments previously rejected by a Trump-appointed federal judge before the election, violating the Purcell principle—a federal election doctrine prohibiting courts from altering election rules directly before, during, or after an election. Griffin's post-election challenges sought to disenfranchise voters based on missing driver's license or Social Security numbers on registration forms and military/overseas voters, despite no evidence of ineligibility.
• North Carolina Republican Party sent postcards with QR codes to notify voters of ballot challenges — The North Carolina Republican Party sent postcards to voters whose ballots were being challenged by Jefferson Griffin, instructing them to scan a QR code for additional information rather than providing direct notice of the quasi-judicial election protest. The postcards did not identify a protestor or campaign committee, provided no forwarding address, and directed voters to a partisan website containing dozens of challenges and thousands of names not listed alphabetically. A dissenting Court of Appeals judge noted that forcing voters to possess technological means and trust to scan an anonymous QR code and navigate a partisan website cannot be considered reasonably calculated to notify affected voters.
• North Carolina State Board of Elections rejected Griffin's ballot challenges — The North Carolina State Board of Elections, which has a Democratic majority, rejected Jefferson Griffin's claims that over 60,000 ballots cast in the November 2024 Supreme Court election were invalid. Griffin had filed legal challenges against these ballots, primarily targeting voters whose registration forms lacked a driver's license or Social Security number, as well as military and overseas voters. The Board's rejection was the first official action to defend the election result against Griffin's post-election challenges.
• North Carolina Supreme Court stays Court of Appeals ruling in Riggs-Griffin election dispute — The North Carolina Supreme Court placed a stay on the Court of Appeals' ruling that would have required notification and cure procedures for 60,000 voters with incomplete registrations. The stay halts implementation of the lower court's order while the state Supreme Court reconsiders the case. Based on prior rulings by the justices, a 3-3 deadlock is described as the best-case scenario for incumbent Justice Riggs; if a deadlock occurs, the Court of Appeals ruling would stand.
• North Carolina Court of Appeals orders notification and cure period for 60,000 voters with incomplete registrations in Riggs-Griffin Supreme Court race — The North Carolina Court of Appeals, in a decision by judges Fred Gore and John Tyson, ruled in favor of Republican Jefferson Griffin's challenge to Justice Allison Riggs' narrow November 2024 election victory. The court ordered election officials to notify approximately 60,000 voters that their registrations were incomplete and gave them 15 days to complete their registrations if they want their ballots to count. The dissent characterized the ruling as "mass disenfranchisement." Riggs appealed to the state Supreme Court, which placed the ruling on hold pending reconsideration.
• North Carolina Supreme Court orders overseas voters to prove eligibility or face ballot discard — The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled that thousands of overseas voters, including military members, must prove their eligibility within 30 days or have their votes retroactively discarded in a state supreme court race won by Democrat Allison Riggs by 734 votes. The court dismissed challenges to 60,000 other voters but upheld the requirement for overseas voters. Justice Anita Earls dissented, arguing the decision amounts to overturning a valid election. Riggs announced plans to challenge the ruling in federal court.
• North Carolina Supreme Court orders overseas voters to prove eligibility, threatening election results — The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled on April 11 that overseas voters must prove their eligibility within 30 days or have their votes discarded, potentially overturning Democratic Justice Allison Riggs's November 2024 election victory by 734 votes. The ruling followed a Republican opponent's challenge to over 65,000 ballots cast by voters who had followed all existing state rules. Riggs has petitioned federal court to intervene, arguing the post-election rule change violates the Constitution and federal law protecting military and overseas voters.
• Jefferson Griffin challenges Alison Riggs' North Carolina Supreme Court election win — Jefferson Griffin filed a legal challenge to Alison Riggs' victory in the North Carolina Supreme Court election. The challenge prompted calls for voters to verify whether their votes were challenged and to contact county Boards of Elections. Pro-democracy organizations including Common Cause NC mobilized to defend the election certification in court.

Supporting reports

• Democratic attorneys general file lawsuit challenging Trump voting executive order — A coalition of 19 Democratic attorneys general filed a federal lawsuit in Massachusetts on April 3, 2025, challenging an executive order signed by President Trump that imposes proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and mandates mail ballots be received by election day. The attorneys general argue the order violates the Constitution's Elections Clause, which reserves election administration to the states, and exceeds presidential authority. The lawsuit names Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission as defendants, seeking a judicial declaration that the provisions are unconstitutional and void.
• Trump signs executive order on election integrity titled "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections" — President Trump signed an executive order last week targeting elections, titled "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections." According to legal analysis, the order asserts powers the president does not constitutionally possess, violates federal law, and tramples federalism principles. The order has already prompted three separate lawsuits challenging its legality in federal court.
• Elias Law Group files complaint challenging Trump election executive order — Elias Law Group filed a 70-page complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and the Democratic Governors Association. Senate and House Democratic leaders joined the suit. The complaint challenges the constitutionality and legality of Trump's election-focused executive order.
• Two nonprofit organizations file separate lawsuits challenging Trump election executive order — Two separate groups of nonprofit organizations filed lawsuits in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging Trump's election-focused executive order. These filings join the earlier complaint filed by Elias Law Group and Democratic Party committees, bringing the total number of lawsuits challenging the order to three.
• Election watchdog organizations and Democratic Party sue to block election system overhaul — On March 31, two election watchdog organizations and the Democratic Party sued the Trump administration to block his executive order to overhaul the election system, including the addition of a proof-of-citizenship requirement and new mail ballot deadline restrictions. The lawsuits challenge the constitutionality and legality of the changes.

Supporting reports

• Attorney General Bondi releases first phase of declassified Epstein files — Attorney General Pamela Bondi, in conjunction with the FBI, declassified and publicly released approximately 200 pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's sexual exploitation of over 250 underage girls. The release includes evidence lists, flight logs, contact books, and masseuse lists. Bondi stated the files shed light on Epstein's network and provide accountability. The Attorney General has requested the FBI deliver thousands of additional pages of previously undisclosed documents by February 28 and tasked FBI Director Kash Patel with investigating why the initial request was not fully complied with.
• Pam Bondi demands full Epstein files from FBI — Attorney General Pam Bondi has demanded the FBI provide the complete files related to Jeffrey Epstein, following a release of partial documents. Bondi's request highlights ongoing scrutiny and demands for transparency regarding Epstein's connections and activities.
• House Judiciary Committee posts misleading link — The House Judiciary Committee's social media account posted a misleading link purporting to provide access to the Epstein files, which instead directed users to a music video. The incident raises concerns about transparency and the use of official channels for misinformation.
• Attorney General Bondi accused FBI of withholding Epstein investigation files — On February 27, 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi released a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel accusing the FBI of "inappropriately withholding thousands of pages of files" related to the Epstein investigation from the DOJ. She demanded the FBI turn over the material by 8 a.m. the following day. This accusation was made after Bondi had stated on Fox News that Trump had directed her to review Epstein's client list for potential release, setting public expectations for disclosure that would later not be met.
• Trump administration delays release of Epstein files after initially promising disclosure to QAnon-aligned influencers — In February 2025, the Trump White House invited 15 right-wing influencers, including QAnon promoters, to meet with Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Vice President JD Vance. They were given binders labeled "The Epstein Files: Phase 1," signaling more releases would follow. Bondi stated on Fox News that Trump had directed her to review Epstein's client list for release. However, months passed without further disclosure. On July 6, the DOJ released an unsigned memo contradicting Bondi's claims, stating there was no "incriminating client list" and no evidence of blackmail. The delay sparked backlash from Trump's MAGA base, including QAnon adherents who believed Trump was covering up evidence.