Narrow these 42 — tap a value to filter:
Attack target 29
Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Jul 22, 2026 CHIRLA and Legal Services for Children sued over a nonwaivable fee for special immigrant juvenile petitions Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The case challenged an administrative barrier that could block poor youth from accessing a legal protection created by statute.
Supporting reports
- Complaint filed — Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. Mullin — On July 22, 2026, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) and Legal Services for Children (LSC) filed a complaint in the Northern District of California challenging the U.S.
Jul 20, 2026 Judge Ho granted stays pending appeal in two Yemen TPS cases and said the lower court would dissolve prior relief if remanded Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The rulings strengthened the government's hand in ending protections while appeals continued, showing courts shaping immigration status through procedure.
Supporting reports
- Stay pending appeal decided — Doe v. Noem (S.D.N.Y.) 1:26-cv-02103 — Judge Ho granted the government's motion for a stay pending appeal, holding that the Supreme Court's decision in Mullin v.
- Stay pending appeal decided — Doe v. Noem (S.D.N.Y.) 1:26-cv-02280
Jul 8, 2026 J. Doe sued DHS over a $1.82 million immigration-related penalty Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The complaint challenged whether a severe federal penalty was coercive and unconstitutional, testing limits on agency punishment.
Supporting reports
- Complaint filed — Doe v. Mullin — On July 8, 2026, J.
Jul 8, 2026 Donald Trump said he would seek a rehearing after the birthright citizenship ruling Corroborated Institutions and Governance
The statement signaled continued executive pressure against a settled constitutional protection and invited renewed institutional conflict.
Supporting reports
- Trump Says He Wants Rehearing in Birthright Citizenship Case — Following a Supreme Court decision upholding birthright citizenship, President Trump announced plans to request a rehearing, criticizing the ruling as "wrong." Rehearings are rare and require a majority court approval.
- Trump to Request Supreme Court Reconsideration of Birthright Citizenship Ruling — Former President Donald Trump announced his intention to ask the US Supreme Court to reconsider its recent ruling that upheld birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
Jul 7, 2026 The Iranian American Legal Defense Fund sued federal officials over alleged sharing of asylum and immigration records with Iran Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The lawsuit challenged alleged executive disclosure of sensitive records and asked courts to enforce legal limits on agency conduct.
Supporting reports
- Complaint filed — Iranian American Legal Defense Fund v. Rubio — On July 7, 2026, the Iranian American Legal Defense Fund (IALDF) filed a complaint in the U.S.
Jun 24, 2026 The Supreme Court allowed the administration to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians. Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The ruling expanded executive discretion in immigration policy by limiting judicial review of TPS termination decisions.
Supporting reports
- Supreme Court Allows End of TPS for Haiti and Syria — The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the federal government can end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for citizens of Haiti and Syria, as determined by then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.
- Supreme Court allows end of Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians — The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow the administration to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for over 350,000 Haitians and several thousand Syrians, stating that the law bars judicial review of the Homeland Security
- Supreme Court Ruling on Temporary Protected Status (TPS) — On Thursday, the U.S.
Jun 24, 2026 The Supreme Court upheld the administration's metering policy that turned back asylum seekers at the border. Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The ruling gave the executive branch broader control over asylum access and reduced judicial barriers to restrictive border policy.
Supporting reports
- Supreme Court Upholds Asylum Seeker Turnback Policy — The Supreme Court upheld a federal policy known as "metering," which allows U.S.
- Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Block Asylum Seekers at US-Mexico Border — The U.S.
- Supreme Court Ruling on Asylum Policy — On June 25, 2026, the US Supreme Court upheld the Trump administration's authority to turn away asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border when crossings are deemed too overburdened.
Jun 21, 2026 The CDC continued suspending entry from certain Ebola-affected countries. Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The order showed agency use of emergency public health authority to restrict entry, affecting oversight of border and health powers.
Supporting reports
- CDC Order Continuing Suspension of Entry from Ebola-Affected Countries — The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued an order under Sections 362 and 365 of the Public Health Service Act, continuing the suspension of entry into the United States for certain persons from the
Jun 5, 2026 A federal judge in Rhode Island struck down Trump's immigration freeze and ordered processing to resume. Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The ruling checked executive overreach by restoring access to immigration processing for people left in legal limbo.
Supporting reports
- Federal Judge Strikes Down Trump Immigration Freeze — A federal judge in Rhode Island struck down Trump's immigration freeze affecting 39 countries, ruling it placed immigrants in "indeterminate legal limbo." The freeze had blocked asylum applications, work permits, and
- Judge Orders Trump Administration to Restart Asylum Processing — A judge ruled that the Trump administration must restart the processing of asylum and immigration applications that had been halted the previous year.
May 11, 2026 The Supreme Court allowed Alabama to use a contested congressional map for the midterms Corroborated Institutions and Governance
The order changed the institutional rules governing representation by letting a disputed map remain in force during an election cycle.
Supporting reports
- Supreme Court Allows Alabama to Use Controversial Electoral Map — The U.S.
- Supreme Court Ruling on Alabama Congressional Districts — The Supreme Court overturned a lower court order, allowing Alabama to eliminate one of its two majority-Black congressional districts.
- Alabama seeks to use legislature-approved map — Alabama has requested the Supreme Court to lift a court order requiring a map with two largely Black districts.
May 9, 2026 The Supreme Court issued a decision in Louisiana v. Callais that weakened Section 2 voting rights protections Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The ruling changed the legal framework for redistricting challenges and reduced a key institutional check on racial vote dilution.
Supporting reports
- Callais ruling means direct democracy is more crucial than ever — The article discusses the implications of a recent court ruling in Callais, emphasizing the importance of direct democracy in the current political climate.
- Supreme Court decision impacts Voting Rights Act — The Supreme Court issued a decision that significantly impacts the Voting Rights Act, altering the legal framework that has protected voting rights for decades.
- Supreme Court ruling weakens Voting Rights Act — On April 29, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Louisiana v.
Apr 21, 2026 Senate Republicans prepared a reconciliation funding package for ICE and Border Patrol Corroborated Institutions and Governance
Using reconciliation for immigration enforcement funding would reduce debate and minority leverage, shifting how major policy is enacted.
Supporting reports
- Senate Republicans prepare ICE and Border Patrol funding package — Senate Republicans are preparing to introduce a funding package for ICE and Border Patrol, expected to cost over $50 billion over three years.
Apr 8, 2026 Eight Latino residents and a labor organization filed a class action against DHS, ICE, CBP, and other agencies over alleged ethnicity-based stops and arrests Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The suit asked courts to review whether federal enforcement practices violated constitutional limits and equal protection norms.
Supporting reports
- Complaint filed — Benitez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security — A putative class action complaint was filed in the Eastern District of New York by eight Latino residents and a grassroots labor organization against the U.S.
Mar 29, 2026 The Supreme Court prepared to hear and then heard arguments on the Trump administration's birthright citizenship order Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The case put a core constitutional guarantee before the Court and tested whether executive power could narrow citizenship by decree.
Supporting reports
- Trump Administration Faces Supreme Court in Birthright Citizenship Case — The Trump administration's legal team is set to appear before the Supreme Court to argue a case concerning birthright citizenship.
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Birthright Citizenship Executive Order — The U.S.
- Supreme Court hears case on Trump's executive order targeting birthright citizenship — Oral argument was held before the Supreme Court.
Feb 23, 2026 Federal courts and litigants filed, amended, consolidated, or ruled on a wide set of administrative and immigration cases Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The filings and rulings showed sustained judicial review of executive actions across immigration, education, housing, health, and records disputes.
Supporting reports
- American Public Health Association v. EPA (D.C. Cir.) 26-1037 — The court consolidated American Public Health Association v. EPA , 26-1037, with Business Climate Initiative Action v. EPA , 26-1039 — The court consolidated American Public Health Association v.
- Freedom of the Press Foundation v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Security (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-03385 — The parties filed a joint status report which indicated that they are continuing to confer regarding Defendants' responses to FOIA requests in an effort to narr… — The parties filed a joint status report which indicated that they are continuing to confer regarding Defendants' responses to FOIA requests in an effort to narrow or eliminate issues requiring the Court's intervention.
- Aceituno v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (W.D.N.C.) 3:26-cv-00146 — Case filed — Case filed Coming soon.
Jan 28, 2026 Judge Tunheim blocked Operation PARRIS detentions and ordered Minnesota refugees released Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The ruling imposed a direct judicial check on federal detention of refugees based only on status.
Supporting reports
- U.H.A. et al v. Bondi et al (D. Minn.) 0:26-cv-00417 — Judge Tunheim granted Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order of Operation PARRIS , enjoining the administration from arresting or detaining a puta… — Judge Tunheim granted Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order of Operation PARRIS , enjoining the administration from arresting or detaining a putative class of Minnesota refugees who have not yet adjusted
- Judge blocks Trump officials from detaining refugees in Minnesota — A federal judge, John R.
Jan 16, 2026 Judge William Young said he would issue a protective order for noncitizen academics in a deportation case Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The order aimed to stop retaliatory immigration actions against scholars and preserve judicial protection for speech rights.
Supporting reports
- Federal judge to issue protective order for noncitizen academics — U.S.
Nov 6, 2025 The Supreme Court allowed the administration to enforce its passport sex-marker policy while litigation continued Corroborated Institutions and Governance
The stay let a contested executive policy take effect before final review, showing the Court's immediate power over rights and administration.
Supporting reports
- US Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Block Passport Sex Markers for Trans and Non-Binary People — On Thursday, the US Supreme Court permitted the Trump administration to enforce a policy that prevents transgender and non-binary individuals from selecting passport sex markers that align with their gender identity.
- Supreme Court grants stay in Trump v. Orr — On November 6, 2025, the U.S.
- Supreme Court Allows Gender Policy Termination — The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can terminate a policy allowing self-identification of gender on passports, pending legal challenges.
Oct 4, 2025 A federal court rejected the Trump administration's attempt to end birthright citizenship Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The ruling upheld a core constitutional rule on citizenship and limited executive efforts to rewrite it unilaterally.
Supporting reports
- Federal Court Rejects Attempt to End Birthright Citizenship — A federal court ruled against the Trump administration's attempt to eliminate birthright citizenship, declaring the effort unconstitutional.
Oct 1, 2025 A coalition of states sued the Justice Department over an immigration-status rule for crime victims Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The suit challenged federal conditions on state victim services and tested state autonomy against immigration enforcement priorities.
Supporting reports
- Coalition Sues DOJ Over Immigration Rule — A coalition of 20 states sued the Trump administration to block a new Justice Department rule that would prohibit states from helping victims of sexual assault and domestic violence unless they can immediately prove
Aug 13, 2025 Officials in Mason, Tennessee approved converting a former prison into a CoreCivic-run ICE detention center Corroborated Institutions and Governance
The vote expanded detention through a private contractor, raising accountability concerns about outsourced coercive power.
Supporting reports
- Tennessee town approves plans to turn former prison into ICE detention center — Officials in Mason, Tennessee, voted to convert a former prison into an immigration detention facility operated by CoreCivic, a private company.
Jul 7, 2025 A Massachusetts federal court began trial in a challenge to the administration's ideological deportation policy for pro-Palestinian students Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The trial tested whether immigration powers were being used to punish protected political expression.
Supporting reports
- Trial begins for lawsuit against Trump administration's 'ideological-deportation policy' — A trial has commenced in a Massachusetts federal court challenging the Trump administration's policy of deporting foreign students for pro-Palestinian views.
Jul 3, 2025 Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act after final House approval Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The final passage completed a major policy shift through a narrow partisan process that tested congressional independence and procedure.
Supporting reports
- Hakeem Jeffries delivers record-breaking House floor speech against GOP tax bill — On Thursday, Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries delivered the longest House floor speech in history, speaking for over eight hours to delay a vote on Donald Trump's $4.5 trillion tax-and-spending bill.
- House of Representatives Advances Trump’s Tax-and-Spending Bill — The House of Representatives advanced Donald Trump's tax-and-spending bill, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, after a procedural vote.
- Passage of Trump's Signature Tax and Spending Bill — On July 3, 2025, the U.S.
Jul 3, 2025 The Supreme Court allowed the deportation of eight men to South Sudan Corroborated Institutions and Governance
The order narrowed lower-court protection against third-country removal and strengthened executive control over deportation outcomes.
Supporting reports
- US Supreme Court Allows Deportation of Eight Men to South Sudan — The US Supreme Court has cleared the way for the deportation of eight men from an American military base in Djibouti to South Sudan.
Jun 26, 2025 The Supreme Court limited lower courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions in the birthright citizenship cases Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The ruling reduced one of the judiciary’s main tools for quickly blocking contested executive policies across the country before merits decisions are final.
Supporting reports
- SCOTUS Limits Nationwide Injunctions — The Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6-3 that nationwide injunctions likely exceed the authority granted to the courts by Congress.
- Supreme Court Limits Judicial Power to Curb Presidential Policies — The U.S.
- Supreme Court Limits Lower Courts' Power to Block Executive Orders — The US Supreme Court ruled in favor of limiting the power of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have been used to block many of Donald Trump's executive orders, including his attempt to end