Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• DoJ sues Chicago and Illinois over sanctuary laws — The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) filed a lawsuit against the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago, accusing them of obstructing the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies. The lawsuit seeks a court order to nullify sanctuary laws that the federal government claims interfere with federal immigration law enforcement. The complaint was filed in a federal court in Chicago, following a national emergency declaration by Donald Trump on his inauguration day. The DoJ aims to prevent these jurisdictions from receiving federal grants if they continue to impede immigration enforcement.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge blocks federal employee buyout plan — A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration and DOGE/Musk from implementing a federal employee buyout plan. Judge George O'Toole Jr. set a hearing to consider further blocking the offer, which unions argue is unlawful and harmful to federal operations. The plan's legality and impact on civil service stability are under scrutiny.
• Trump administration restricts DOGE access to Treasury systems — Following a lawsuit by government employee unions, the Trump administration filed a proposed order to temporarily restrict DOGE officials' access to sensitive Treasury payment systems. The order allows two DOGE employees to read data without further access. This move likely preempted a judicial restraining order, and its acceptance by the judge or plaintiffs remains uncertain.
• Judge temporarily blocks Trump’s buyout deadline for federal employees — A federal judge, George O’Toole, temporarily blocked the Trump administration's deadline for federal employees to decide on a buyout offer. The deadline, initially set for February 6, 2025, was extended to allow time for legal briefs before a hearing. The buyout offer involved severance pay and benefits for those leaving their jobs, with new reforms for those staying. The judge's decision provides time for further legal examination without indicating the final ruling outcome.
• Case update — American Federation of Gov’t Employees, AFL-CIO v. Ezell (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10276 — Judge George O'Toole issued an order to pause the program and extend the deadline until Monday when a hearing is scheduled.

Supporting reports

• Senate Democrats protest against Russell Vought's nomination — Senate Democrats held an all-night protest against Russell Vought, Trump's nominee to lead the White House budget office, due to his role in Project 2025, a conservative blueprint for Trump's second term. Despite their efforts, Vought was confirmed along party lines. The protest was part of a broader Democratic strategy to oppose Trump's agenda, which includes a now-rescinded order freezing federal loans and grants. Activists were pleased with the Democrats' increased resolve to challenge the administration's actions.
• Senate urged to block Russell Vought's OMB appointment — There is a concerted effort to pressure the Senate to block the appointment of Russell Vought as Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Vought, associated with Project 2025, is accused of planning to staff the government with loyalists and undermine agencies by withholding congressionally-allocated resources. His refusal to testify that he would prioritize the Constitution over Trump's demands has intensified opposition. The Senate is expected to vote on his confirmation soon, and public campaigns are urging Senators to reject his nomination.
• Senate filibuster against Russell Vought — Democratic senators, led by Chuck Schumer, initiated a filibuster to block the confirmation of Russell Vought as the director of the Office of Management and Budget. The senators expressed concerns that Vought's proposals would threaten critical federal funding for programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.
• Legislation introduced to counter Musk's actions — Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Hakeem Jeffries announced the introduction of legislation aimed at stopping Elon Musk's actions regarding the Treasury's payment systems. The proposed legislation, titled "Stop the Steal," seeks to protect Americans from potential abuses stemming from Musk's control over government financial operations.
• Senate to vote on Russell Vought's confirmation — The Senate is scheduled to vote on the confirmation of Russell Vought as the head of the Office of Management and Budget. Vought is criticized for his role in the Project 2025 agenda, which opponents argue could lead to policies detrimental to working families and democratic governance.
• Judge Griffin's Attempt to Overturn Supreme Court Election — Judge Griffin is reportedly attempting to overturn the results of a Supreme Court election in North Carolina by seeking to discard 65,000 votes. This action has been characterized as an outrageous power grab by the NC Supreme Court. The situation has prompted a campaign by Common Cause NC to raise awareness and ensure that affected voters are informed. The campaign highlights the importance of public vigilance and participation in safeguarding electoral integrity.
• Judge Griffins attempts to alter NC Supreme Court election — Judge Griffins is reportedly attempting to alter the outcome of the North Carolina Supreme Court election by targeting 60,000 votes, potentially affecting the election of Justice Alison Riggs. This action has prompted calls for public engagement and court attendance to ensure the integrity of the election process.
• Protests against government actions held nationwide — Nationwide protests have been held in response to recent government actions, including the seizure of the US Treasury and the potential confirmation of Russell Vought. These protests are described as peaceful expressions of First Amendment rights, with significant public participation.

Supporting reports

• Trump fired NLRB and EEOC members — President Trump fired Gwynne Wilcox, a member of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), and two members of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Charlotte Burrows and Jocelyn Samuels. These firings were criticized as unprecedented and illegal, as the members were appointed by Democratic presidents and had several years left in their terms.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration releases order to identify civil servants for dismissal — The Trump administration released an order requiring federal agencies to identify civil servants who could be stripped of legal protections against arbitrary dismissal. This order potentially affects a large number of federal employees, undermining the 1978 Civil Service Act's protections. The move is seen as an effort to politicize the federal workforce by allowing dismissals based on political loyalty.
• Trump demands mass resignations of civil servants — President Trump demanded the mass resignation of civil servants, offering eight months' pay for those who resign within a week. This move is part of an effort to reshape the federal workforce to be more loyal to his administration. The Office of Personnel Management sent an email to approximately 2.3 million federal workers, indicating a push to create a "reliable, loyal, trustworthy" workforce, raising concerns about politicization of the civil service.
• Trump issues executive order stripping civil servants of protections — President Trump signed an executive order that strips civil servants of many employment protections, making it easier to dismiss them for political reasons. This order is seen as an attempt to bypass the 1978 Civil Service Act, which ensures that federal workers are hired based on merit and cannot be arbitrarily dismissed. The move has been criticized as an attack on the independence and integrity of the civil service.
• Musk announces "deferred resignation" program for federal employees — Elon Musk, using his access to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), emailed all federal civil employees to announce a "deferred resignation" program. The program offers pay and benefits until September 30, 2025, for employees who choose to resign, with minimal work requirements. The program has been condemned by the American Federation of Government Employees as it could disrupt federal government operations. Musk's influence in Washington stems from his role in the Department of Government Efficiency, despite not being a federal employee.
• Agencies can rescind resignation agreements at their discretion — The OPM memo states that agencies can rescind the "deferred resignation" agreement at their sole discretion, without review by the Merit Systems Protection Board or any other forum. While employees can request a rescission of their resignation, the agency is not obligated to agree. This provision gives agencies significant control over the resignation process and limits employees' ability to challenge decisions.
• Federal employees may be required to work despite resignation agreement — The OPM contract for the "deferred resignation" agreement specifies that federal employees who accept the offer must work through February 28. After this date, they may not be expected to work except in "rare circumstances" determined by their agency. The contract does not define these circumstances, leaving the decision to the agency's discretion. This contradicts earlier claims that employees would not have to work during the resignation period.
• OPM contract waives federal employees' legal rights — The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) released a contract for the "deferred resignation" agreement, which includes a waiver of federal employees' rights to enforce the agreement in court or any other forum. Section 13 of the contract states that employees waive their right to pursue any legal action related to their employment or the resignation offer. This waiver includes claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and prohibits labor unions from filing grievances on behalf of employees.
• Trump administration offers "deferred resignation" to federal employees — The Trump administration, through the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), offered a "deferred resignation" deal to federal employees, claiming they could resign effective September 30 and receive full pay without working until then. However, the fine print revealed employees might still be required to work until their resignation date. About 20,000 federal workers accepted the offer. The administration aimed for a 5-10% resignation rate, but the offer was misleadingly reported as a "buyout" without a lump sum payment. The deal's terms were clarified in a new OPM memo and contract.