Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• AFL-CIO and unions file emergency motion for temporary restraining order against RIFs — The AFL-CIO, AFGE, and AFSCME filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order on Friday, October 10, to block the Trump administration from carrying out reduction-in-force layoffs during the government shutdown. Union leaders, including AFGE president Everett Kelley and AFSCME president Lee Saunders, characterized the layoffs as illegal and warned of devastating effects on critical services and workers' families. The unions pledged to pursue "every available legal avenue" to stop what they termed "unlawful attacks."

Supporting reports

• Pete Hegseth announced Qatari Air Force base at Mountain Home Airbase in Idaho — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that the U.S. will accept a letter to build a Qatari Emiri Air Force facility at Mountain Home Airbase in Idaho, where Qatari military fighter pilots will train over U.S. airspace. The announcement drew immediate criticism from right-wing figures and commentators who questioned the national security implications and alleged connections to Trump's business dealings with Qatar, including a reported $5.5 billion golf resort project.
• Qatar Air Force base established at Mountain Home Air Base, Idaho — The Trump administration announced a new military partnership granting Qatar its own Air Force facility at Mountain Home Air Base in Idaho. The facility, called the "Qatari Emiri Air Force Facility," will host Qatari F-15s and pilots. This occurred during a U.S. government shutdown while troops remained unpaid and millions faced loss of health care.
• Pentagon permitted Qatar to establish military facility on U.S. soil in Idaho — On October 10, 2025, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that the U.S. government will permit Qatar to establish a military presence on U.S. soil. The Qatari government will create a Qatar Emiri Air Force facility at Mountain Home Air Base in Idaho, which will host Qatari F-15 fighter jets and pilots who will train alongside U.S. troops. This announcement followed Qatar's May 2025 gift of a luxury 747 jet to the U.S. government and occurred within weeks of Trump's September 29 executive order elevating Qatar's security status to NATO-equivalent levels.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge blocked National Guard deployment to Portland — The White House justified a proposed National Guard deployment to Portland by characterizing the city as "war-ravaged." The Portland police chief publicly contradicted this characterization, stating "I would not say Portland's war-ravaged." A federal judge blocked the deployment, finding the justification insufficient. The article notes that Portland residents responded by appearing in the city in costume and character, treating the "war zone" designation as unfounded.
• Federal judge blocks Trump administration's National Guard deployment to Illinois — U.S. District Judge April Perry, appointed by President Biden, issued a temporary injunction on October 9 blocking the Trump administration's order to deploy 300 federalized Illinois National Guard members to the state. The judge raised doubts about the administration's justification for the deployment, questioning its explanation in light of local conditions. Illinois and Chicago had jointly sued to stop the deployment. A federal appeals court later upheld Perry's decision on Thursday, October 17, keeping the deployment blocked while legal challenges proceed.

Supporting reports

• Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt becomes first Republican governor to question National Guard deployment — In an interview with the New York Times, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt, the current chair of the National Governors Association, criticized the federal deployment of troops in Illinois, becoming the first Republican governor to publicly question the deployment. Stitt noted that establishing such a precedent could allow future presidents to use it against Republican states. He stated: "Oklahomans would lose their mind if Pritzker in Illinois sent troops down to Oklahoma during the Biden administration." Stitt also noted that the National Governors Association, as an educational organization under IRS code, could not formally weigh in on the deployment.
• Vermont Governor Phil Scott opposes federalized National Guard deployment to Chicago and Portland — Vermont Governor Phil Scott, a Republican, publicly opposed the Trump administration's deployment of federalized National Guard troops to Chicago and Portland, Oregon. Scott stated that using the National Guard against civilians is unconstitutional and compared the deployment to the January 6 insurrection, saying such action would only be justified in the event of an actual insurrection.
• Governor Kevin Stitt criticized Texas National Guard deployment to Illinois — Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt, chairman of the National Governors Association, criticized Texas Governor Greg Abbott's deployment of Texas National Guard troops to Illinois as a violation of federalism and states' rights principles. Stitt stated that Oklahoma would object if Illinois Governor Pritzker had sent troops to Oklahoma during the Biden administration, and noted that he and Abbott had previously sued the Biden administration over federal overreach on vaccination and mask mandates.

Supporting reports

• DHS reassigned hundreds of national security specialists — Bloomberg reported that the DHS reassigned hundreds of national security specialists, including cyber personnel, to work on efforts related to the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Employees who refuse their mandatory reassignment could lose their jobs.
• Nearly one-quarter of FBI agents reassigned to immigration enforcement — The Washington Post reported that nearly one out of every four FBI agents has been reassigned from their duties to work on immigration enforcement, which includes upward of 40% of the country's largest field offices staff, according to FBI data obtained by Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.).
• Trump administration redirects 45% of FBI agents in major field offices to immigration enforcement — The Trump administration has reassigned approximately 45% of FBI agents in the country's 25 largest field offices to support Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement operations, according to personnel data obtained by Senator Mark Warner. Across all FBI offices, 23% of roughly 13,000 total agents are now working on immigration matters, diverted from counterterrorism, cybercrime, drug trafficking, espionage, violent crime, and counterintelligence work. The redirection has raised concerns among former agents and experts about national security gaps and potential for abuse during immigration raids.

Supporting reports

• Pentagon orders national guards to form "quick reaction forces" for crowd control — A Pentagon directive signed by Maj Gen Ronald Burkett on 8 October ordered all 50 US states, DC, and territories to form "quick reaction forces" trained in riot control, including batons, shields, Tasers, and pepper spray. The memo sets thresholds requiring most states to train 500 national guard members (23,500 total nationwide) and cites Trump's August executive order authorizing rapid nationwide deployment to quell civil disturbances. Military trainers will deploy to every state; forces are to be operational by 1 January 2026. A separate Pentagon document mandates creation of a specialized military police battalion within the DC National Guard.
• Pentagon orders National Guard quick reaction forces for civil disturbances — On October 8, Major General Ronald Burkett, director of the Pentagon's National Guard bureau, issued an order requiring National Guard units in all states, U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia to form "quick reaction forces" trained in riot control. Most states must train 500 personnel each, totaling approximately 23,500 troops nationwide, with deployment readiness required by January 1, 2026. The order relies on an August 25 executive order signed by Trump directing the secretary of defense to ensure National Guard availability for assisting law enforcement in quelling civil disturbances.

Supporting reports

• White House OMB argues furloughed federal workers not entitled to back pay under GEFTA — The White House Office of Management and Budget issued a draft memo arguing that the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act (GEFTA) of 2019 does not automatically guarantee back pay to furloughed federal workers during the ongoing government shutdown. OMB General Counsel Mark Paoletta stated that Congress must include express appropriations language for back pay in legislation ending the shutdown. The OMB previously removed references to GEFTA from shutdown guidance. An estimated 750,000 federal workers have been furloughed as of the shutdown's seventh day.
• White House OMB memo argues federal workers not entitled to back pay — On Tuesday, the White House Office of Management and Budget released a memo contending that federal workers are not entitled to back pay during the shutdown, contradicting a 2019 law that mandates such compensation. House Speaker Mike Johnson subsequently stated at a press conference that he believes federal employees should receive back pay, citing statutory law. The memo represents an attempt to reduce pressure on Republicans to end the shutdown quickly.
• White House threatens federal workforce layoffs during shutdown — White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced that if the shutdown continued, the Trump administration would lay off federal employees, despite federal law entitling them to back pay. She also warned that a food assistance program for low-income mothers and children would exhaust its funding. Director of OMB Russ Vought had already cancelled funding for energy and transportation projects in Democratic-governed states.
• Administration announces continuation of illegal cuts during government shutdown — On October 1, 2025, as the government shutdown began, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought announced plans to use the shutdown to implement $26 billion in cuts to infrastructure and climate projects in Democratic-led states, as well as to lay off federal employees instead of furloughing them. This action is part of a broader strategy to impose significant cuts to government programs.
• OMB floats denial of back pay guarantee for furloughed federal workers — The Office of Management and Budget issued a memo suggesting that federal workers furloughed during a government shutdown are not guaranteed back pay when the shutdown ends, departing from the administration's own guidance issued the previous month. This reverses the 2019 law that President Trump himself signed to guarantee such pay. Administration officials told media outlets the memo is intended to give Republicans leverage in shutdown negotiations with Democrats. OMB director Russell Vought had previously threatened mass firings if Democrats refused the Republican continuing resolution.
• Trump suggested not all furloughed employees deserve back pay — Speaking to reporters alongside Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump suggested that not all furloughed federal employees should receive back pay following the government shutdown. He noted, "It depends on who we're talking about," and added, "We're going to take care of our people. There are some people that really don't deserve to be taken care of, and we'll take care of them in a different way."
• OMB revised guidance removing back pay guarantee — Government Executive reported that the Office of Management and Budget quietly revised a guidance document last week to remove references to a law passed during Trump's first term, guaranteeing all federal workers back pay following a government shutdown.
• Trump signals furloughed federal workers may not receive back pay — During a White House event, President Trump stated that some furloughed federal workers may not receive customary back pay when the government reopens, saying "there are some people that don't deserve to be taken care of" and that back pay "depends on who we're talking about." This breaks with historical precedent and creates uncertainty for unpaid workers already under financial strain.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge allows Texas National Guard deployment to Chicago to proceed while Illinois lawsuit pending — U.S. District Judge April Perry declined to immediately block the deployment of Texas National Guard troops to Chicago in response to a lawsuit filed by Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul against the Trump administration. The judge allowed the federal government to continue the deployment while it responds to Illinois's suit, setting a midnight Wednesday deadline for the government's reply. Texas Guard members departed Fort Bliss on Monday evening; Illinois Governor JB Pritzker stated the administration had not consulted him and called it "Trump's invasion."
• Federal judge declines to block National Guard deployment to Chicago — U.S. District Judge April Perry declined to immediately block Texas National Guard troops from entering Chicago on October 7, 2025, despite a pending lawsuit filed by Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and the city of Chicago seeking to stop the deployment. The judge's refusal to grant an injunction allowed the Trump administration to proceed with mobilizing troops to the city.
• Federal judge holds hearing on legality of Chicago national guard deployment — U.S. District Judge April Perry held a hearing in downtown Chicago on the constitutionality of the national guard deployment after Illinois and Chicago officials filed to declare it illegal. State and city attorneys argued the deployment violates the Constitution and represents a "constitutional crisis," while a Department of Justice lawyer defended it as necessary due to "tragic lawlessness." The hearing drew heavy public turnout requiring an overflow room.
• Judge Ellis restricts federal agents' use of force in northern Illinois — US District Judge Sara Ellis issued a preliminary injunction restricting federal agents' use of force against protesters and journalists in northern Illinois who do not pose a serious threat. The order prohibits pepper balls, rubber bullets, and physical force such as pulling, shoving, or tackling. Ellis also required federal agents to wear visible identification such as badges, addressing concerns about masked plainclothes officers conducting immigration enforcement operations.
• Judge Perry temporarily blocks Trump's national guard deployment in Chicago — US District Judge April Perry issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration from federalizing or deploying the national guard in Illinois. The order, effective Thursday and lasting two weeks, came after the state of Illinois sued over Trump's directive to send hundreds of troops to Chicago for immigration enforcement and crime reduction. Perry found no credible evidence of rebellion in Illinois and criticized the Department of Homeland Security's characterization of events as "simply unreliable." The White House stated it would appeal.
• U.S. District Judge April M. Perry blocks federal National Guard deployment in Chicago for two weeks — U.S. District Judge April M. Perry issued a temporary restraining order halting the federal deployment of 200 National Guard troops from Texas and 300 from Illinois in and around Chicago for two weeks. Perry stated: "I have found no credible evidence that there is a danger of rebellion in the state of Illinois." She cited grand jury refusals to indict protesters accused of assaulting law enforcement and questioned the Department of Homeland Security's credibility and assessment of conditions in Chicago.
• Grand juries refuse to indict Chicago protesters accused of assaulting law enforcement — Grand juries in Chicago, including one on Tuesday night, refused to indict protesters accused of assaulting law enforcement. Judge Perry cited these refusals in her decision to block the federal National Guard deployment, stating they cast doubt on the Department of Homeland Security's credibility and assessment of conditions in Chicago. The grand jury refusals suggest local juries do not view the alleged assaults as warranting criminal charges.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration tightens commercial driver's license requirements for immigrant truckers, forcing license cancellations and departures — The Trump administration implemented federal restrictions on commercial driver's licenses for noncitizen truckers, requiring English proficiency and valid immigration status. Karina Krainova, a Ukrainian trucker who entered legally under the Biden-era Uniting for Ukraine program, had her South Carolina license canceled in October 2025 after new rules took effect. Facing potential ICE detention, she returned to war-torn Ukraine rather than risk arrest. Approximately 9,500 drivers have been removed from roads for failing English proficiency requirements; another 135 licenses were canceled in South Carolina alone.

Supporting reports

• Federal appeals court hears arguments on Trump's control of Oregon national guard troops — A federal appeals court heard arguments on whether Trump had constitutional authority to take control of 200 Oregon national guard troops for deployment to Portland. U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut granted a temporary restraining order on Saturday blocking the Oregon deployment and on Sunday blocked deployment of any national guard troops to Portland. The case centers on the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits military involvement in domestic law enforcement.
• Federal appeals court paused order on Oregon National Guard — A federal appeals court paused an order prohibiting Trump from federalizing 200 members of the Oregon National Guard, but left in place a second order barring them from being deployed to Portland.

Supporting reports

• Multiple lawsuits filed challenging constitutionality of Missouri redistricting law — Multiple lawsuits have been filed arguing that Missouri's HB 1 redistricting law violates the state constitution on two grounds: (1) mid-decade redistricting is not permitted without a triggering event such as a new census, and (2) the resulting districts are neither contiguous nor compact, violating state constitutional requirements. These suits proceed independently of the referendum effort and represent a separate legal avenue to block or overturn the gerrymander.
• People Not Politicians files court challenge to referendum petition rejection — The pro-voting coalition People Not Politicians filed a lawsuit challenging Secretary of State Hoskins' rejection of the redistricting referendum petition. The coalition argues that Hoskins misapplied Missouri's constitution by citing a section governing citizen-initiated amendments rather than referenda, and that state officials may only reject referendum petitions "as to form" (procedural defects), not on substantive grounds like premature filing. The outcome will determine whether the 20,000+ signatures already gathered can count toward the required 106,000 valid signatures by December 11.
• Illinois files lawsuit to block national guard deployment — Illinois Governor JB Pritzker filed a lawsuit on Monday to stop Trump from sending federal troops to the state, joining California and Oregon in court challenges. Federal Judge April M. Perry said she needed time to review the case before ruling on the state's request for a temporary restraining order in an emergency court hearing.
• Illinois sued Trump administration over National Guard deployment — Illinois sued the Trump administration to block the deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago, arguing the move is illegal and violates the Constitution. The filing notes, "The American people, regardless of where they reside, should not live under the threat of occupation by the United States military, particularly not simply because their city or state leadership has fallen out of a president's favor."
• Illinois Attorney General files lawsuit to block federalization of state National Guard and deployment of out-of-state troops — Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul filed a lawsuit seeking to immediately and permanently stop President Trump from federalizing the state's National Guard or deploying troops from other states to Illinois. The lawsuit argues that such actions infringe on state sovereignty and self-governance, and will cause unrest, harm community relations, increase mistrust of police, and depress business and tourism. Raoul contends the American people should not live under threat of military occupation based on political disagreement with state leadership.
• Illinois and Chicago file lawsuit to block National Guard deployment — Illinois and Chicago filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard troops to the city, characterizing it as "Trump's long-declared 'War'" on Chicago and Illinois and calling it "unlawful and dangerous." A court hearing on the lawsuit was scheduled for Thursday. The lawsuit represents an official state and municipal challenge to the federal deployment order.
• Case update — Illinois v. Trump (N.D. Ill.) 1:25-cv-12174 — State Attorney General of California submitted an amicus brief in support of Plaintiffs.
• Appeal filed — Illinois v. Trump (N.D. Ill.) 1:25-cv-12174 — State Attorneys General submitted an amicus brief in support of Defendants. Oct. 9-10, 2025: Judge Perry granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) enjoining the “federalization and deployment of the National Guard of the United States within Illinois.” In an accompanying opinion , the court found Plaintiffs likely to succeed on their claim that the deployment exceeded the President's authority under 10 U.S.C § 12406, because neither the “rebellion” predicate of 10 U.S.C. § 12406(2) nor the “unable with the regular forces” predicate of § 12406(3) had been met. The court also found that the unlawful federalization likely violated the Tenth Amendment by usurping Illinois's control over its own National Guard, but declined to reach Plaintiffs' Posse Comitatus Act claim. Defendants appealed to the Seventh Circuit, Case No. 25-2798 .
• Illinois governor files lawsuit against federal National Guard deployment — Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the state has filed a lawsuit to prevent the federal government from sending National Guard troops from any state to Illinois, arguing that such actions are unconstitutional. Pritzker emphasized the need to push back against what he described as the Trump administration's disregard for laws.
• Illinois Governor Pritzker announced Illinois is suing to stop federalized National Guard deployment — Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that Illinois has sued to stop the administration from sending federalized National Guard troops from any state to Illinois, arguing the deployment is unconstitutional. Pritzker stated that the Trump administration does not respect laws and will continue acting unlawfully unless stopped.

Supporting reports

• Federal government shutdown enters fifth day amid stalled negotiations between Republicans and Democrats — The U.S. federal government entered its fifth day of shutdown on October 6, 2025, with negotiations between House Republicans led by Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Democrats led by Chuck Schumer at a standstill. Johnson accused Democrats of being "not serious" in negotiations, while Democratic leaders countered that Republicans were driving the shutdown. White House economic council director Kevin Hassett threatened mass layoffs of federal workers if negotiations fail. A CBS poll showed only 28% of Democratic voters and 23% of Republicans support their party's shutdown position.
• Senate rejects rival government funding bills; shutdown enters second week — The US Senate held its fifth vote on competing government funding proposals as the shutdown entered its second week. A Republican-written bill failed 52-42, and the Democratic proposal was defeated 50-45, both falling short of the 60-vote threshold. Trump suggested possible negotiations with Democrats over healthcare subsidies, while the White House threatened federal workforce layoffs and warned that food assistance programs for low-income mothers and children would exhaust funding if the shutdown continued.
• Senate rejects competing shutdown-funding bills; deadlock persists — On Wednesday, the Senate voted down both Democratic and Republican proposals to end the federal government shutdown for the sixth time. No senators changed their positions from recent days. The shutdown, now eight days old, has forced federal office closures, furloughed employees, and created staffing shortages at airports and air traffic control centers. Democrats demand healthcare provisions including ACA premium tax credit extensions; Republicans propose funding only through November 21. Military personnel and federal workers face missed paychecks next week unless the government reopens.
• Senate deadlocked on shutdown funding as Trump threatens Democratic-led jurisdictions with retaliation cuts — The US Senate held its seventh round of votes on competing proposals to end an eight-day government shutdown, with neither Democratic nor Republican bills achieving the 60-vote threshold needed for advancement. Democrats demand extension of ACA premium tax credits and restoration of public media and Medicaid funding; Republicans insist on a clean continuing resolution through November 21. During a White House cabinet meeting, Trump threatened to make permanent cuts exclusively to "Democrat programs" in Democratic-led states and cities as retaliation. The OMB has already cancelled federal funding for projects in several Democratic jurisdictions.

Supporting reports

• Trump said he would consider invoking Insurrection Act — Trump told reporters he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act to deploy the military to US cities, saying, "If I had to enact it, I'd do it, if people were being killed and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up."
• Trump threatens Insurrection Act invocation against Portland anti-ICE protesters — Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act against anti-ICE protesters in Portland, signaling willingness to use federal military or emergency powers to suppress domestic dissent against immigration enforcement operations.
• Trump again suggested invoking Insurrection Act — Trump once again suggested he would invoke the Insurrection Act, saying, "It's been invoked before," and adding, "Chicago is a great city where there's a lot of crime, and if the governor can't do the job, we'll do the job." The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was more than three decades ago, and it hasn't been used against a state's wishes since the 1960s Civil Rights Movement.

Supporting reports

• Federal officers deploy force against Portland protesters — Following Judge Immergut's ruling blocking the National Guard deployment, federal officers showed force against protesters outside the ICE facility in Portland. Officers pushed protesters hundreds of yards down city streets and fired tear gas, flash-bang grenades, and pepper balls without clear signs of provocation. The deployment was accompanied by videographers with professional equipment and drones, suggesting a coordinated media operation.

Supporting reports

• ICE deploys tear gas, pepper balls, and body slams against protesters and journalists in Broadview, Illinois — ICE agents, alongside Illinois state police and Cook County sheriff's office, deployed tear gas and pepper balls against protesters gathered at an ICE processing facility in Broadview, Illinois on Friday. Videos show agents body-slamming protesters to the ground. Journalists covering the protests were also attacked—a CBS Chicago reporter was hit with a pepper ball from 50 feet away; a Chicago Sun-Times reporter was tear-gassed; and an Unraveled Press reporter was detained. Legal observers were similarly targeted. The facility, not designed as a detention center, holds nearly 5,000 detainees statewide under "Operation Midway Blitz."
• ICE agents deploy tear gas against protesters in multiple U.S. cities — Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents used tear gas and other force against peaceful protesters in Portland, Washington DC, and Chicago during enforcement operations. The article references unspecified brutality by the Administration and an unwarranted raid on a Chicago apartment building, indicating escalating use of force against civilian demonstrators opposing immigration enforcement actions.

Supporting reports

• Illinois Governor Pritzker reports ultimatum from Trump administration — Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker posted that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called him with an ultimatum: call up state National Guard troops or the Trump administration would federalize them. Pritzker characterized the demand as "absolutely outrageous and un-American" and stated the administration planned to federalize 300 members of the Illinois National Guard. He described the deployment as "a manufactured performance—not a serious effort to protect public safety" and asserted "For Donald Trump, this has never been about safety. This is about control."

Supporting reports

• White House authorizes deployment of 300 Illinois National Guard members — On Saturday afternoon, a White House spokesperson announced that Trump has "authorized" the deployment of 300 Illinois National Guard members. Governor Pritzker later stated he had been informed that members of the Texas National Guard would also be deployed to Illinois, further expanding federal military presence in the state without state consent.
• Trump issued presidential memorandum calling 300+ Illinois National Guard into federal service to protect federal personnel and property in Illinois — President Trump issued a presidential memorandum on October 4, 2025, directing the Secretary of War to call at least 300 members of the Illinois National Guard into federal service. The memorandum states that federal facilities in Illinois, particularly those supporting ICE and Federal Protective Services, have faced "coordinated assault by violent groups" seeking to obstruct federal law enforcement and impede deportations. Trump determined that regular U.S. forces are insufficient and that the situation warrants mobilization. The National Guard personnel are authorized to perform protective activities the Secretary of War deems necessary to ensure federal law execution, with a 60-day duration or at the Secretary's discretion.
• Trump authorized deployment of 300 Illinois National Guard troops to Chicago — Trump authorized the deployment of 300 Illinois National Guard troops to Chicago. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker called the move unnecessary and a "manufactured performance—not a serious effort to protect public safety," signaling state-level resistance to the federal deployment order.
• Trump administration deploys 300 California National Guard troops to Portland — On Sunday, October 5, blocked from deploying Oregon National Guard troops in Portland by Judge Immergut's ruling, the Trump administration deployed 300 California National Guard troops to Portland instead. California Governor Gavin Newsom announced the deployment, characterizing it as "a breathtaking abuse of the law and power" and stating the Trump administration is "unapologetically attacking the rule of law itself and putting into action their dangerous words—ignoring court orders and treating judges, even those appointed by the President himself, as political opponents."
• Trump administration deploys national guard troops to Portland despite judicial order — The Pentagon deployed 200 national guard members from California to Oregon on Sunday, and the Trump administration announced plans to send additional troops from Texas, directly after Judge Immergut's temporary restraining order. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek reported that 101 California national guard members arrived by plane on Saturday night with no formal federal communication and unverified locations. The administration proceeded without state authorization or coordination.
• Trump administration orders Texas national guard deployment to Illinois without state authorization — The Trump administration ordered 400 members of the Texas national guard to deploy to Illinois, Oregon, and other states without communicating with Illinois Governor JB Pritzker. Texas Governor Greg Abbott stated he "fully authorized" Trump to deploy the troops. Chicago could see Texas troops deployed by Tuesday or Wednesday as the administration moves to federalize the Illinois national guard.
• Trump authorizes national guard deployment to Chicago — President Trump authorized deployment of 300 Illinois national guard troops to Chicago, citing "violent riots and lawlessness." The deployment follows a border patrol shooting of a woman on Chicago's southwest side during an operation where agents reported being rammed by vehicles. Governor JB Pritzker opposed the move, calling it unnecessary and stating the Pentagon issued an ultimatum to deploy troops or face federal deployment. The action occurs amid an intensified immigration enforcement crackdown by ICE in the city.
• Trump Authorizes Deployment of Illinois National Guard — President Trump authorized the deployment of 300 Illinois National Guard members to assist in protecting federal facilities, following a demand for the state to call up its troops. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker criticized this action as an overreach of federal power.
• Trump administration announces deployment of California national guard to Portland — Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell announced that approximately 200 federalized members of the California national guard were being reassigned from Los Angeles to Portland, Oregon at the direction of President Trump to support ICE and other federal personnel and protect federal property. This deployment occurred despite prior court orders and without state authorization, following Trump's September 27 announcement of plans to deploy guard troops to Portland.
• Illinois Governor Pritzker called Trump's National Guard deployment an "invasion" — Illinois Governor JB Pritzker stated that Trump ordered 400 Texas National Guard members for deployment to Illinois and other locations without any federal officials contacting him directly to discuss or coordinate the action. Pritzker characterized the deployment as "Trump's Invasion," noting it began with federal agents and would include federalized National Guard members against the state's wishes, and called on Texas Governor Abbott to withdraw support and refuse to coordinate.
• Texas Governor Abbott authorized National Guard deployment — Texas Governor Greg Abbott responded to Illinois Governor Pritzker's criticism by stating he fully authorized the President to call up 400 members of the Texas National Guard to ensure safety for federal officials, and argued that either other states must fully enforce protection for federal employees or allow Texas Guard to do so. Abbott asserted the superiority of Texas National Guard training and expertise.
• Trump administration federalized Texas National Guard for deployment to Portland and Chicago — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced the federalization of 2,000 Texas National Guard members, with 400 being deployed to Portland, Oregon and Chicago, Illinois. This action came immediately after a federal judge blocked the federalization of the Oregon National Guard, appearing to circumvent the court order by using troops from another state. The administration characterized this as a response to unrest in those cities.
• National Guard deployment to Chicago area begins — National Guard troops from Texas began arriving at Elwood Army Reserve Center, approximately 50 miles outside Chicago, as part of a Trump administration deployment. By Wednesday, 200 Texas National Guard troops had arrived with another 300 Illinois National Guard troops preparing to deploy. The FAA issued flight restrictions over the center until December 6. Trump administration officials stated troops would protect federal immigration agents and facilities, not assume law enforcement duties, though the deployment proceeded despite objections from Illinois Governor Pritzker and Mayor Johnson.
• Trump administration deploys national guard troops to Chicago area for immigration enforcement — The Trump administration deployed approximately 500 national guard troops (200 from Texas, 300 from Illinois) to the Chicago area to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities and federal property. The deployment occurred without coordination with Illinois Governor JB Pritzker or Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson. A federal judge held a hearing on whether to declare the deployment illegal, with state and city attorneys arguing it violates the Constitution. Trump attacked both officials on social media, saying they "should be in jail."

Supporting reports

• Trump called for removal of New York Attorney General Letitia James on Truth Social — On Truth Social, Trump called for the removal of New York Attorney General Letitia James, whom he called "SCUM" and a "Complete and Total Disaster." He also baselessly accused James of "costing New York State Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in lost business." This follows months of pressure from Trump against James, who brought a business fraud case against him in 2023.
• Trump called for jailing of Illinois Governor and Chicago Mayor — On Truth Social, Trump called for the jailing of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, accusing them of "failing to protect" ICE officers. In response, Pritzker called Trump "unhinged," "insecure," and a "wannabe dictator," adding, "If you come for my people, you come through me. So come and get me."
• Trump calls for arrest of Chicago mayor and Illinois governor — On October 8, President Trump called for the arrest of Chicago's Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, both Democrats, accusing them of failing to safeguard immigration officers. The statement escalated Trump's rhetoric regarding the National Guard deployment dispute and represented a direct attack on state and local Democratic officials who had opposed the federal military deployment to their jurisdiction.
• Trump calls for jailing Chicago mayor and Illinois governor; National Guard deploys to Chicago area — President Trump called for the imprisonment of Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker on Truth Social, accusing them of failing to protect ICE officers. Simultaneously, National Guard troops from Texas began arriving at an army reserve center near Chicago at Trump administration order, despite objections from Illinois officials. Illinois and Chicago filed a lawsuit seeking to block the deployment, with a court hearing scheduled. Mayor Johnson signed an executive order barring federal immigration agents from using city property for enforcement operations.
• Trump calls for Spanberger withdrawal on Truth Social — President Trump posted on Truth Social calling Spanberger "weak and ineffective" and echoing Republican demands that she withdraw from the Virginia gubernatorial race over her continued support for Jay Jones despite the violent texts controversy.
• Trump calls for jailing Chicago mayor and Illinois governor over National Guard deployment objections — On October 8, 2025, as hundreds of National Guard troops were poised to enter Chicago against the objections of the city's Democratic mayor and Illinois governor, President Trump called for jailing both officials despite neither having been charged with crimes. The deployment was part of Trump's militarized immigration crackdown, which the Democratic leaders had criticized.
• Trump attacks Chicago and Illinois officials, calls for their imprisonment — President Trump sent social media posts attacking Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, both Democrats, saying they "should be in jail" for failing to protect federal agents during immigration enforcement operations. The attacks came as the administration escalated its presence in Chicago and announced plans to purchase additional buildings for ICE operations.
• President Trump posted that Chicago Mayor and Governor Pritzker should be in jail — President Trump posted on his social media account that the Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect ICE officers and that Governor Pritzker should also be in jail. The posts appeared to be retaliation for the officials' resistance to the National Guard deployment.

Supporting reports

• Russ Vought froze federal infrastructure funding in blue states — Russ Vought, acting in his federal role, placed a hold on $2.1 billion in Chicago infrastructure projects, specifically the Red Line Extension and the Red and Purple Modernization Project, citing concerns about race-based contracting. The action represents a continuation of Vought's pattern of freezing federal funding on infrastructure projects in Democratic-led states.
• Trump administration freezes $2.1bn in Chicago transit funding, citing diversity concerns — OMB Director Russ Vought announced a freeze of $2.1 billion in federal funding for Chicago infrastructure projects, including Red Line extensions and modernizations of the city's mass transit system. Vought justified the hold as ensuring "funding is not flowing via race-based contracting," citing a new Transportation Department rule effective Wednesday. The move targets a Democratic-led city during a federal government shutdown and follows a similar $18 billion freeze on New York transit projects announced the previous day.
• Trump administration withholds $2.1 billion in Chicago transit funding citing race-based contracting concerns — Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought announced that $2.1 billion in federal funding for two transit infrastructure projects in Chicago had been placed on hold, citing concerns about "race-based contracting." The action occurred during the ongoing federal shutdown and was characterized as part of the Trump administration's strategy to retaliate against Democratic-led areas by canceling federal dollars for projects in those jurisdictions.

Supporting reports

• Energy Department slashes climate funding and freezes construction projects during shutdown — The U.S. Energy Department is cutting nearly $8 billion in climate-related funding for projects across 16 states and freezing $18 billion allocated for two New York City construction projects. Trump stated he would meet with Russell Vought, head of the Office of Management and Budget, to determine which agencies aligned with his political priorities should face cuts, describing the shutdown as an "unprecedented opportunity" to eliminate what he called "Democrat Agencies."
• OMB Director Vought impounded $8 billion in climate funding targeting Democratic states — Russell Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, announced on October 2 that he was canceling $8 billion in congressionally approved funding for programs he claimed "fuel the Left's climate agenda." The targeted states were California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington—all states with Democratic senators. Vought stated the impoundments were illegal and used them selectively against Democratic-led states during the government shutdown.
• OMB Director Vought vowed to cut $26 billion from New York City projects — Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought vowed to cut $26 billion from projects in New York City that Congress had previously approved. Legal experts note that such impoundments lack lawful basis, as a government shutdown does not grant the OMB director additional authority to unilaterally rescind congressionally appropriated funds. Vought also vowed to slash the federal government broadly without legal justification.
• Vought announced $18 billion hold on New York City infrastructure projects — Russell Vought announced on October 2 that approximately $18 billion in New York City infrastructure projects had been placed on hold. He stated the action was to ensure funding was not flowing based on "unconstitutional DEI principles" and specifically cited the Hudson River Tunnel Project (Gateway) and the Second Avenue Subway project. The announcement came during the government shutdown and targeted infrastructure in a state with Democratic senators.
• Maine Family Planning announces primary care closure due to Medicaid defunding — Maine Family Planning announced on October 2, 2025, that it will cease offering primary care at its clinics by October 31, 2025, due to loss of Medicaid reimbursements under Trump's tax and spending bill. The organization will continue offering STI screenings and contraception to all patients regardless of insurance status "for as long as we are able." Approximately 70% of Maine Family Planning patients receive all healthcare from the organization, making the closure a significant access loss.
• White House pauses infrastructure and clean energy funding to Democratic states — OMB Director Russ Vought announced on social media that approximately $18 billion in New York City infrastructure projects have been placed on hold to prevent funding flowing to "unconstitutional DEI principles." Vought also announced cancellation of nearly $8 billion in clean energy funding, characterizing it as fueling "the Left's climate agenda." The actions target Democratic-leaning states during the government shutdown impasse.
• Energy Department terminated 321 awards for 223 projects — Hours after Russ Vought pledged to revoke climate-related funding, the Energy Department announced it had terminated 321 awards for more than 223 projects, claiming the investments did not "advance the nation's energy needs" and were not "economically viable." The agency provided scant details about the cuts.
• Vought announced cancellation of $8 billion in climate funding — OMB Director Russ Vought posted that nearly $8 billion in "Green New Scam" funding was being cancelled to halt the "Left's climate agenda." He listed projects in 16 states, all of which are blue states: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.
• Vought announced freeze on $18 billion in NYC infrastructure projects — OMB Director Russ Vought announced that roughly $18 billion in New York City infrastructure projects, specifically the Hudson Tunnel Project and the Second Avenue Subway, had been put on hold. Vought claimed the freeze was to ensure funding was not flowing based on "unconstitutional DEI principles."
• Russ Vought froze federal infrastructure funding in blue states — Russ Vought, acting in his federal role, placed a hold on $2.1 billion in Chicago infrastructure projects, specifically the Red Line Extension and the Red and Purple Modernization Project, citing concerns about race-based contracting. The action represents a continuation of Vought's pattern of freezing federal funding on infrastructure projects in Democratic-led states.
• Trump administration freezes $2.1bn in Chicago transit funding, citing diversity concerns — OMB Director Russ Vought announced a freeze of $2.1 billion in federal funding for Chicago infrastructure projects, including Red Line extensions and modernizations of the city's mass transit system. Vought justified the hold as ensuring "funding is not flowing via race-based contracting," citing a new Transportation Department rule effective Wednesday. The move targets a Democratic-led city during a federal government shutdown and follows a similar $18 billion freeze on New York transit projects announced the previous day.
• Trump administration withholds $2.1 billion in Chicago transit funding citing race-based contracting concerns — Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought announced that $2.1 billion in federal funding for two transit infrastructure projects in Chicago had been placed on hold, citing concerns about "race-based contracting." The action occurred during the ongoing federal shutdown and was characterized as part of the Trump administration's strategy to retaliate against Democratic-led areas by canceling federal dollars for projects in those jurisdictions.

Supporting reports

• Trump warns military leaders of "enemy within" and suggests using Democratic cities as training grounds — On September 30, 2025, President Trump addressed hundreds of top military officials and warned darkly about the need to counter "the enemy within," declaring that "America is under invasion from within" and that "Democrats run most of the cities that are in bad shape." Trump suggested the military could be useful in his drive against crime in Democratic cities and could use these cities as military "training grounds," raising concerns about violations of the Posse Comitatus Act.
• Trump addressed military commanders on deploying troops in U.S. cities — President Trump spoke to assembled military commanders at Quantico, framing domestic civil unrest as an "invasion from within" equivalent to foreign military threats. He stated he had signed an executive order establishing a quick reaction force for quelling civil disturbances and indicated that deploying combat troops to major U.S. cities including San Francisco, Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles would be "a major part" of military operations. He referenced the constitutional oath to defend against "all enemies foreign and domestic" and characterized inner cities as a "war" requiring military intervention.
• Trump told military leaders to confront "enemy from within" — Speaking to hundreds of senior US military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, President Trump warned of an unspecified "enemy from within," stating "We're under invasion from within, no different than a foreign enemy, but more difficult in many ways, because they don't wear uniforms." He also suggested that cities like San Francisco, Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles could be used "as training grounds for our military," language echoing authoritarian rhetoric about internal enemies and military deployment against civilian populations.
• Trump deploys National Guard troops to Chicago in October — In October, President Trump deployed National Guard troops to Chicago, continuing the pattern of using military forces for domestic law enforcement and immigration enforcement purposes.

Supporting reports

• Senate rejects competing funding bills; government shutdown imminent — On September 30, the Senate rejected both a Republican-backed funding extension through November 21 and a Democratic alternative that included healthcare provisions. Democrats blocked the GOP bill while Republicans blocked the Democratic measure; neither cleared the 60-vote threshold. The White House threatened mass federal worker layoffs if shutdown occurs. Senate Republican leaders announced plans to revote on Wednesday to pressure Democrats to switch positions.
• Senate failed to pass continuing resolution; government shutdown imminent — The Senate adjourned on September 30 without passing a continuing resolution to fund the government beyond the deadline. Republicans refused to include Democrats in negotiations. Democrats, whose votes were needed for passage, refused to support a continuing resolution unless it included a fix to extend premium tax credits under the Affordable Care Act. Republicans had extended 2017 tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations while allowing premium tax credits to expire at year's end, which would cause healthcare insurance premiums to skyrocket by approximately 75 percent. The impasse resulted in a government shutdown.
• US federal government shutdown after Senate rejects competing funding bills — The US federal government shut down at midnight on October 1, 2025, after the Senate failed to advance either a Republican-drafted continuing resolution (55-45 vote) or a Democratic proposal (47-53 vote). Republicans control both chambers but lack the 60-vote Senate threshold needed to pass funding without Democratic support. The shutdown marks the first since December 2018. Democrats demanded extension of ACA premium tax credits and reversal of Medicaid cuts; Republicans refused. The White House announced plans to furlough approximately 750,000 federal workers.
• US federal government shutdown begins; Democrats demand healthcare concessions — On October 1, 2025, federal government funding lapsed, triggering a shutdown. As of mid-October, Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, have refused to vote to reopen the government without concessions on healthcare (ACA premium tax credits, Medicaid cuts reversal), public media funding, and limits on Trump's "pocket rescissions" authority. Republicans have demanded funding restart before negotiations. Seven Senate votes have failed to reach the 60-vote threshold. The shutdown has forced hundreds of thousands of federal employees to remain unpaid and prompted agency closures nationwide.
• Senate Adjourns Without Passing Government Funding Resolution — On September 30, 2025, the Senate adjourned without reaching an agreement on a continuing resolution to fund the government, which had been passed by the House. The failure to negotiate was attributed to Republican refusal to include Democrats in discussions, leading to a potential government shutdown. Democrats insisted that any resolution must include an extension of premium tax credits for healthcare under the Affordable Care Act, which Republicans allowed to expire.
• Federal government shut down — The federal government shut down on October 1 after the Republican-controlled Congress failed to pass proposals to keep the government open. It is the first government shutdown since Trump's first term, which lasted 34 days between December 2018 and January 2019.
• US federal government shutdown enters third day; Senate votes fail on competing funding proposals — The US federal government remained shut down for a third consecutive day on Friday, October 3, 2025, after the Senate failed to advance either Democratic or Republican funding proposals in a fourth round of voting. Neither bill secured the 60 votes needed for passage. Senate Majority Leader John Thune called for Democrats to support the Republican continuing resolution, while Democrats demanded inclusion of healthcare protections and reversal of Medicaid cuts before reopening. The shutdown, which began Wednesday at midnight, is expected to continue into the following week.

Supporting reports

• Federal agencies issue partisan shutdown blame statements in apparent Hatch Act violation — Multiple federal agencies (VA, HUD, HHS, Interior, Commerce, Labor, NLRB, National Archives, Patent Office, FTC) issued emails and public statements on September 30 blaming Democrats and the "radical left" for an impending government shutdown. The statements used identical or similar language across agencies and included partisan characterizations. Legal experts characterized the coordinated messaging as violating the Hatch Act, which restricts political activities by federal employees, and potentially violating federal law on lobbying with taxpayer funds.
• HUD website displays partisan shutdown message blaming "radical left" — The Department of Housing and Urban Development posted a large red banner on its homepage blaming the "radical left" for the looming government shutdown and stating the Trump administration wants to keep government open. The message appeared after Republican and Democratic leaders failed to reach a spending agreement by the Tuesday night deadline. HUD spokesperson Matthew Maley defended the banner as reporting on shutdown impacts, while critics characterized it as inappropriate partisan propaganda on a public agency website.
• Veterans Affairs spokesperson issues partisan shutdown statement — A Department of Veterans Affairs spokesperson issued a statement on Tuesday using charged political rhetoric, blaming "radical liberals in Congress" for attempting to shut down the government to achieve "open borders" and other partisan characterizations, while warning of impacts to veterans care and assistance programs.
• White House violated Hatch Act by using federal agencies to blame Democrats for shutdown — During the government shutdown crisis on September 30, the White House violated the Hatch Act—which prohibits use of government resources for partisan gain—by directing federal agencies to send emails to employees blaming Democrats for the shutdown. Agencies including the Social Security Administration, Small Business Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, and Department of Commerce sent emails stating Trump "opposes a government shutdown" but Democrats were "blocking this Continuing Resolution… due to unrelated policy demands." The Department of Housing and Urban Development posted a banner calling the "Radical Left" responsible for the shutdown. The Department of Veterans Affairs issued a statement blaming "Radical liberals in Congress" for attempting to shut down the government.
• HUD posted banner blaming "radical left" for shutdown — The Department of Housing and Urban Development posted a bright red banner on its website on September 30 blaming the "radical left" for the impending government shutdown. The banner read, "The Radical Left are going to shut down the government and inflict massive pain on the American people unless they get their $1.5 trillion wish list of demands. The Trump administration wants to keep the government open for the American people." The non-profit consumer advocacy group Public Citizen subsequently filed a complaint with the US Office of Special Counsel, calling the banner a "blatant violation" of the Hatch Act.
• White House threatens federal worker layoffs during government shutdown — The Trump administration warned that federal worker layoffs are imminent if the government shutdown continues. Vice President Vance stated the administration would "lay some people off" and take "extraordinary steps" to maintain essential services. Approximately 750,000 federal employees face furlough with pay withheld, while essential workers such as military and border agents may be forced to work without pay. OMB Director Russ Vought announced the White House is also pausing or canceling infrastructure and clean energy funding to Democratic-leaning states.
• Department of Education employees' email accounts manipulated with partisan talking points — NBC News reported that Department of Education employees who were furloughed discovered their email out-of-office messages had been altered to include partisan talking points blaming Democrats for the government shutdown. Five civil servants provided copies of their manipulated messages, which had been rewritten in the first person without their consent. Employees stated the alterations violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity.
• Federal agencies deploy partisan messaging blaming Democrats for shutdown, potentially violating Hatch Act — Multiple federal agencies, including Treasury, Agriculture, Education, and at least a dozen others, have used official websites and employee out-of-office messages to blame Democrats for the government shutdown. The Department of Education altered employees' automated replies without their knowledge or approval. Legal experts and watchdog groups argue this constitutes a violation of the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity. Public Citizen and the Democracy Defenders Fund have filed complaints with the GAO and Special Counsel's office.
• Department of Education changed furloughed employees' out-of-office messages to blame Democrats — During the government shutdown, the Department of Education changed automated out-of-office email replies for furloughed employees from generic messages to ones blaming Democrats for the shutdown. When employees changed the messages back to neutral language, the Department changed them again to blame Democrats. This represents use of government communications infrastructure to advance partisan messaging during a shutdown.
• Trump administration threatens mass firings of federal employees during shutdown — On Thursday morning, the Trump administration threatened to fire many employees at federal agencies across the nation, creating fear and uncertainty among furloughed workers. Some employees printed out furlough notices and pay stubs in preparation for potential unemployment. The threat occurred amid the ongoing government shutdown and the administration's use of the crisis to pursue policy goals, including cutting climate funding and freezing construction projects.
• Federal agencies post partisan messages blaming Democrats for shutdown operations curtailment — Several federal government departments posted partisan and potentially illegal messages stating that their operations were curtailed due to "the Radical Left Democrat shutdown." Sources at the Education Department reported that out-of-office email messages were changed without staff permission to use rhetoric blaming Democrats for the shutdown. The action represents an apparent coordinated effort to use government communications infrastructure for partisan messaging during the funding lapse.
• White House issues fact sheet attributing government shutdown economic impacts to Democratic opposition to funding restrictions on healthcare for undocumented immigrants — The White House published a fact sheet on October 3, 2025, presenting state-by-state economic projections attributed to a government shutdown. The document claims the Council of Economic Advisers warns of $15 billion in weekly GDP losses, projects 43,000+ additional unemployed Americans over a month-long shutdown, and lists estimated impacts on WIC recipients, SNAP beneficiaries, consumer spending, and gross state product by state. The fact sheet frames the shutdown as caused by Democratic demands to fund healthcare for undocumented immigrants.

Supporting reports

• American Federation of Government Employees files lawsuit challenging deferred resignation program — The American Federation of Government Employees and other labor unions representing federal workers filed a lawsuit challenging the deferred resignation program, alleging it circumvents congressional authority, undermines statutorily required government functions by causing mass employee departures, and was enacted under threat of firings. The lawsuit remains ongoing as of the article date. AFGE president Everett Kelley stated the program should not be viewed as voluntary and represents an effort to create a toxic work environment.

Supporting reports

• Oregon sued to block National Guard deployment to Portland — On September 28, Oregon filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration seeking to block the deployment of National Guard troops to Portland. The lawsuit characterized the move as "provocative and arbitrary" and argued it "threaten[s] to undermine public safety by inciting a public outcry."
• Oregon attorney general sued Trump administration over National Guard deployment — Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield filed a lawsuit against President Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, and their respective departments, alleging that the National Guard had been unlawfully deployed for law enforcement duties. The suit was filed less than six hours after Hegseth's order calling 200 Oregon National Guard members into federal service for 60 days.
• Oregon files federal lawsuit to block Trump's seizure of state national guard troops for Portland deployment — Oregon's attorney general filed a lawsuit in federal court on Sunday seeking to block President Trump's deployment of 200 Oregon National Guard troops to Portland. Trump claimed authority under provisions allowing suppression of "rebellion" or lawlessness, but Oregon argues the characterization of Portland as "war ravaged" is false and based on outdated 2020 protest footage mixed with current social media reports. Governor Kotek stated there is no insurrection or public safety threat warranting military intervention, only routine free speech demonstrations near an ICE facility managed by local law enforcement.
• Oregon attorney general files lawsuit to block National Guard deployment — Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's activation of 200 federalized members of the Oregon National Guard for deployment to Portland. A federal judge was scheduled to hear arguments on Friday regarding whether to grant a temporary restraining order blocking the troop deployment, which the state opposes on constitutional and federalism grounds.