Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Stars and Stripes staff sue Pentagon for First Amendment violation — Erik Slavin, Lara Korte, and Max Lederer sued Defense Secretary Hegseth, the Defense Department, Principal Deputy Assistant Andrew Brey, and Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, alleging they were fired in retaliation for speaking as private citizens in support of press freedom and for the publication's reporting on deteriorating conditions aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln. The suit alleges a "blatant violation" of the First Amendment and "extraordinary censorship efforts."

Supporting reports

• Senator Blumenthal demands USPS Postmaster General cease ballot mail project and provide records — Senator Richard Blumenthal, top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, issued formal demands to Postmaster General David Steiner to abandon the ballot mail IT project, cease work ordered halted by federal court, and provide by September 8 all records related to the project, including names and dates of personnel involved. Blumenthal characterized the system as designed to "disenfranchise millions of Americans," noting that one-third of all Americans cast ballots by mail.
• Senator Blumenthal requested information on USPS mail-voting plan and accused administration of political motivation — Senator Blumenthal requested detailed information from the Postmaster General about the USPS mail-voting verification plan. Blumenthal stated the USPS rule puts all mail voters at risk and accused the Trump administration of being "hellbent on changing the framework of casting ballots in this country, clearly for political reasons."
• Federal whistleblower disclosed flaws in USPS mail-voting verification system — An anonymous federal worker filed a whistleblower disclosure with Senator Blumenthal warning that the U.S. Postal Service's new system to regulate mail voting for the midterms has been "rushed, chaotic, and fundamentally flawed." The USPS issued the rule last week, and it is currently blocked by federal court. The whistleblower alleges workers were forced to create the system in weeks when it should have taken 9 months, and that work continued on implementation even after being ordered to stop. The disclosure warns the Trump administration "has hidden the high likelihood that the new ballot mail verification processes will result in major disruptions in mail ballots ever getting delivered to voters." Specific concerns include rejection of entire batches of thousands of ballots when a problem with one voter is found, and no planning for inevitable errors. The whistleblower called one portion of internal software "garbage."

Supporting reports

• Pentagon and DOJ establish joint taskforce to identify and prosecute press leaks — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the creation of a joint Pentagon-DOJ taskforce to identify and prosecute unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information to the press. Hegseth delegated tasking authority to the Pentagon's Office of General Counsel to request records and support across the department for media leak investigations. The announcement follows the Trump administration's issuance of subpoenas to New York Times journalists who reported on security concerns regarding Trump's new Qatari-gifted aircraft. The taskforce represents an escalation in the administration's crackdown on leaks and press freedom.

Supporting reports

• Attorney General announces indictment of former FBI Director James Comey — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that a federal grand jury in North Carolina had indicted former FBI Director James Comey with threatening Trump. The charges stemmed from an Instagram post Comey made of seashells arranged to spell "86 47," which he deleted and apologized for, stating he was unaware the number could convey violent intent. The DOJ completed its investigation nearly a year later and chose to announce the charges days after the White House Correspondents' Dinner shooting.
• Acting Attorney General Blanche announces DOJ evidence in Comey case — On May 3, 2026, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that the Department of Justice has "evidence of all sorts" from an 11-month investigation into James Comey that it will present at trial. This statement came as part of the prosecution of Comey on charges related to the Instagram seashell post, which legal experts characterized as a weak case designed to appease Trump.
• Attorney General Blanche addressed selective prosecution of '86 47' posts. — Attorney General Todd Blanche was asked on NBC whether other people would be prosecuted for posting "86 47" or only James Comey. Blanche responded that the phrase is "posted constantly" and "used constantly," stating that "every single case depends on the investigation that is done."

Supporting reports

• Dhillon directs civil rights division to investigate Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson for alleged race discrimination — After Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who is Black, spoke about hiring Black people in his administration to ensure they "look out for the interest of Black folks," the civil rights division's official account posted a letter from Dhillon informing Johnson he was under investigation for violating the 1964 Civil Rights Act's prohibition on race discrimination. The investigation was announced publicly on social media the day after Johnson's remarks, a highly unusual practice that alarmed former civil rights lawyers and signals the weaponization of civil rights law against efforts to address racial equity.
• Dhillon directs investigation into Cassidy Hutchinson, January 6 committee witness — The civil rights division, under Dhillon's oversight, is investigating Cassidy Hutchinson, the former Trump aide who gave vivid testimony to the January 6 committee about the president's actions on that day. The source notes it is unclear what civil rights violation, if any, Hutchinson committed. The investigation appears retaliatory against a witness who testified against Trump.
• Dhillon directs investigation into Pennsylvania school bus driver firing over "English only" sign — In December 2025, after a local news outlet published a story about a Pennsylvania school bus driver being fired for posting an "English only" sign on her bus, Dhillon posted that she had directed the civil rights division to open an investigation into "this situation implicating DEI wokeness." The investigation was announced on social media days after learning of the incident, departing sharply from standard practice in which the civil rights division does not publicly announce investigations or release letters informing targets they are under investigation.
• Dhillon posts on social media about ongoing DOJ investigations in early stages — Harmeet Dhillon, with 1.3 million followers on her personal X account, has posted official department letters on X announcing civil rights investigations, a highly unusual practice that has alarmed former civil rights division lawyers. The practice violates longstanding norms that investigations remain confidential until formal notice is provided. Dhillon has also posted about investigations in early stages, departing from standard practice in which the civil rights division does not publicly announce investigations.

Supporting reports

• John Mazurek accepts Alford plea in Cop City arson case, resolves three-year prosecution without conviction — John Mazurek, a 33-year-old Georgia carpenter, resolved a three-year felony arson case by accepting an Alford plea to the reduced charge of criminal damage to property on March 7, 2026. Superior Court Judge Emily Richardson approved the plea, which carries a decade of probation but no conviction. Mazurek had faced up to 20 years for allegedly burning police motorcycles during July 2023 protests against a police training facility. The case involved two months of jail time, 24-hour house arrest, ankle monitoring, and persistent surveillance. Prosecutors' evidence centered on trace DNA from a soda bottle fashioned into an incendiary device, though defense analysis showed genetic material from up to five additional people on the bottle.
• Probation conditions imposed on Mazurek restrict First Amendment protest activity and association — As part of the Alford plea resolution, Judge Emily Richardson imposed probation conditions requiring Mazurek to abstain from "activities, movements, rallies or protests … outwardly expressing or proclaiming anti-government sentiment" for ten years. He was also prohibited from associating with "Defend the Atlanta Forest," described by prosecutors as a group but which functioned as a social media account broadcasting movement messages. Legal experts note such conditions are common in politically motivated prosecutions and serve to isolate defendants and communities from legitimate First Amendment activity.

Supporting reports

• Ghislaine Maxwell announces Fifth Amendment invocation at House deposition — Ghislaine Maxwell announced she will invoke her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refuse to answer all substantive questions during her scheduled deposition before the House Oversight Committee on Monday. Maxwell previously delayed her testimony while awaiting a Supreme Court ruling that went against her months ago. Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer expressing concerns about Maxwell's blanket refusal to testify.
• Rep. Khanna sent letter to Comer regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition — Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer before Ghislaine Maxwell's scheduled deposition, noting that Maxwell intended to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege on a blanket basis rather than question-by-question. Khanna submitted seven specific questions in advance, including inquiries about unnamed co-conspirators, her relationship with Trump and Epstein, potential pardon discussions, and client lists or records involving foreign governments.
• Ro Khanna sends letter to House Oversight Committee on Maxwell testimony concerns — Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, exclusively obtained and published by MeidasTouch, laying out serious concerns about Ghislaine Maxwell's refusal to testify. Khanna noted that Maxwell's blanket Fifth Amendment assertion contradicts her prior conduct when she met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche about substantially similar topics. Khanna formally submitted the exact questions he intends to ask Maxwell, including whether she or Epstein arranged access to underage girls for Trump, whether there were discussions about a pardon in exchange for silence, and whether Epstein maintained client lists.
• Ghislaine Maxwell invoked Fifth Amendment and refused testimony in House deposition — Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted sex trafficker and longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein, invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer all substantive questions during her remote House Oversight Committee deposition. Maxwell read a brief opening statement prepared by her attorney and then declined to engage further. Her attorney, David Oscar Marcus, publicly argued that Maxwell would be willing to speak "fully and honestly" if granted clemency by Trump, effectively conditioning testimony on a presidential pardon or commutation.
• Ghislaine Maxwell refused to answer questions before House Oversight Committee, invoking Fifth Amendment and conditioning testimony on presidential clemency — Ghislaine Maxwell appeared for a deposition before the House Oversight Committee but declined to answer any questions, invoking her Fifth Amendment right to silence. Through her attorney David Markus, Maxwell stated she would testify fully only if granted clemency by President Trump. Committee Chair James Comer acknowledged the demand was unprecedented and outside his authority. Multiple House members responded with criticism, noting Maxwell's refusal to address co-conspirators in Epstein's child sex trafficking operation and questioning what Trump may have promised her.
• House Democrats highlighted Maxwell's inconsistent invocation of Fifth Amendment — House Democrats noted that Maxwell previously answered questions posed by Todd Blanche, Trump's former criminal defense lawyer who later became a senior Justice Department official, without invoking the Fifth Amendment and made statements that further incriminated her. Now, after additional Epstein-related documents have been made public, she is refusing to answer even basic factual questions, suggesting selective silence designed to protect powerful third parties rather than a legitimate assertion of constitutional rights.
• Rep. Jasmine Crockett accused Trump administration of prioritizing protection of powerful over accountability — Rep. Jasmine Crockett stated that Maxwell's continued silence demonstrated a complete lack of remorse and concern for survivors. She accused the Trump administration of prioritizing the protection of the powerful over accountability for crimes against children, adding that Democrats on Oversight and Judiciary would not be deterred or distracted from pursuing the investigation.
• Rep. Melanie Stansbury called Maxwell's deposition evidence of active cover-up — Rep. Melanie Stansbury characterized the deposition as evidence of an active cover-up, describing it as a coordinated attempt to keep Maxwell silent long enough to secure clemency rather than to provide accountability for victims of sex trafficking. Stansbury pointed to the growing number of Epstein-related investigations overseas, noting that leaders in multiple countries have been forced to resign or face scrutiny over mere associations with Epstein.
• Rep. Ro Khanna stated Maxwell's refusal deepened concerns about selective silence — Rep. Ro Khanna noted that several of his inquiries during the deposition did not implicate Maxwell criminally but could implicate powerful third parties. Khanna stated that the blanket invocation of the Fifth Amendment made little sense given the nature of the questions and that the refusal only deepened concerns about selective silence designed to protect others.
• Ghislaine Maxwell invokes Fifth Amendment, refuses to answer congressional questions on Epstein associates — Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted of facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of minors, refused to answer questions during a closed-door congressional deposition on Monday, invoking her Fifth Amendment right to silence. Her attorney cited a pending habeas petition and suggested she would speak only if granted clemency by President Trump. Democratic Representative Robert Garcia criticized her refusal and alleged "White House cover-up," noting her prior willingness to answer questions in a July interview with Trump's deputy attorney general Todd Blanche.
• Ghislaine Maxwell refuses to testify to House oversight committee — Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's convicted co-conspirator who procured many of his victims, refused to testify before the House Oversight Committee investigating the Epstein case, invoking her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The refusal occurred after Maxwell was moved to a lower-security prison in Texas, and Khanna noted her prior willingness to speak with Trump's deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, raising questions about selective cooperation.
• Ghislaine Maxwell refuses to answer questions before House Oversight Committee — Ghislaine Maxwell, serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking, testified by video before the House Oversight Committee and refused to answer any questions, invoking her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Her lawyer stated she is "prepared to speak fully and honestly" if Trump grants her clemency.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration strips civil service protections — The Office of Personnel Management issued a final rule to remove civil service protections from approximately 50,000 federal employees, allowing the administration to replace nonpartisan civil servants with loyalists. This move reverses a long-standing nonpartisan civil service established in 1883.
• Trump administration removed job protections for approximately 50,000 federal workers — The Trump administration moved to remove job protections for approximately 50,000 federal workers by creating a new employment category called "Schedule Policy/Career," shifting whistleblower handling away from the independent Office of Special Counsel toward internal agency processes. The Office of Personnel Management framed the change as "accountability," but the rule raises questions about whether professional government can remain professional if continued employment depends more directly on alignment with leadership than on neutral expertise.
• Federal employment protections eliminated for 50,000 workers — The Trump administration finalized rules removing job protections for up to 50,000 federal workers by shifting them into a new "Schedule Policy/Career" employment category. The change redirects whistleblower complaints away from independent oversight mechanisms toward internal agency processes, reducing external accountability for federal employees.

Supporting reports

• Senator Slotkin said she is under federal investigation — Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) said in an interview that federal prosecutors are investigating her for participating in a video with other Democratic lawmakers calling on military members to refuse illegal orders.
• DOJ threatens Federal Reserve with criminal indictment over interest rate policy — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell publicly stated that the Department of Justice threatened criminal charges against the Fed related to a multi-year renovation project of Federal Reserve office buildings. Powell characterized the threat as retaliation for the Fed's decision to set interest rates based on economic conditions rather than presidential preference, stating the threat was "a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President."
• Federal investigation opened against Michigan senator Elissa Slotkin for video urging troops to refuse illegal orders — Michigan senator Elissa Slotkin announced she is under federal investigation by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for her participation in a video released in 2025 in which she and five other Democratic lawmakers with military backgrounds urged U.S. troops to refuse unlawful orders. The video's message aligns with established military law and constitutional principle. President Trump called the video "seditious behavior by traitors" punishable by death; the White House later clarified he did not seek execution but wanted them "held accountable." Slotkin characterized the investigation as weaponization of federal government to intimidate political opponents.
• Senator Elissa Slotkin faces federal criminal investigation for oath video — Senator Elissa Slotkin is now under federal criminal investigation for appearing in a video urging service members to remember their oath and refuse illegal orders. The investigation represents potential criminalization of speech encouraging military personnel to uphold constitutional obligations and refuse unlawful commands.
• Four additional Democratic lawmakers said they are under investigation — Four additional Democratic lawmakers said they are being investigated by the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia over their participation in a viral video calling on military members to refuse illegal orders.
• Trump DOJ investigates Democratic lawmakers over military video on illegal orders — Three House Democrats—Jason Crow (Colorado), Maggie Goodlander (New Hampshire), and Chrissy Houlahan (Pennsylvania)—confirmed that the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C., led by Jeanine Pirro, requested interviews regarding their participation in a November video instructing troops they need not comply with illegal orders. The investigation expands to five lawmakers total; the Pentagon also formally censured Senator Mark Kelly and launched administrative proceedings. Trump called the video "seditious" and threatened capital punishment, later walking back but maintaining the lawmakers face "serious jeopardy."

Supporting reports

• Defense Secretary Hegseth issued formal censure of Senator Kelly for calling military to refuse unlawful orders — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a formal censure of Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy officer, stating that Kelly's call for military personnel to refuse unlawful orders "undermines the chain of command," "counsels disobedience," "creates confusion about duty," "brings discredit upon the armed forces," and "is conduct unbecoming an officer." Hegseth directed the Navy Secretary to investigate reducing Kelly's retirement grade. This action followed Kelly's November 18 participation in a video with five other Democratic veterans in Congress reminding military and intelligence personnel of their legal obligation to refuse orders that violate the law or Constitution.
• Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth censured Senator Mark Kelly and threatened military pension cuts and criminal prosecution — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth censured Senator Mark Kelly, cut his military pension, threatened demotion, and warned of possible criminal prosecution after Kelly urged service members to obey their oath to the Constitution. The action appears to be retaliation for Kelly's public criticism of Hegseth and the Trump administration. Kelly responded by stating he would fight the censure and threats, characterizing Hegseth as "the most unqualified Secretary of Defense in our country's history" and asserting that Hegseth and Trump do not have the authority to suppress Americans' right to speak about their government.
• Defense Secretary Hegseth issues formal censure to Senator Mark Kelly and initiates rank-stripping proceedings — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a formal censure to Democratic Senator Mark Kelly on January 6, 2026, and initiated administrative proceedings to strip Kelly of his retired military rank and reduce his pension. Hegseth accused Kelly of making "seditious statements" after Kelly, along with five other Democratic lawmakers who are military or intelligence veterans, released a November 2025 video urging service members to uphold the Constitution and refuse unlawful orders. Hegseth cited Articles 133 and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Kelly has 30 days to respond; the Navy Secretary must complete the rank review within 45 days.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge restores whistleblower lawyer's security clearance after blocking White House revocation — Attorney Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer who represented whistleblowers critical of the Trump administration, had his security clearance revoked in March 2025 via presidential memo. Zaid sued in May, arguing the revocation was political retribution. On December 23, 2025, federal judge Amir H. Ali granted a preliminary injunction requiring immediate restoration of Zaid's clearance, finding the revocation was solely motivated by Zaid's representation of government-adverse clients and violated due process. The administration complied by January 13, 2026.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Zaid v. Executive Office of the President (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01365 — Judge Ali granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and denied the government's motion to dismiss. Judge Ali enjoined the government from giving effect to the security clearance revocations or denial of access to classified information as to Zaid. The preliminary injunction will not go into effect until Jan. 13, 2026.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed: Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Office of Management and Budget — A coalition of government oversight non-profit organizations filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland challenging the Office of Management and Budget's decision to withhold congressionally-appropriated funds for the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) in fiscal year 2026. Plaintiffs allege that OMB's defunding has blocked their ability to counsel whistleblowers, access critical resources, and support independent federal oversight. They assert violations of the Administrative Procedure Act, constitutional separation of powers, and the Anti-Deficiency Act, and seek declaratory and injunctive relief compelling OMB to apportion the funds.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Marrazzo v. Kennedy et al. (D. Md.) — Jeanne Marrazzo, former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the NIH, filed a federal complaint against Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other HHS officials alleging unlawful termination in retaliation for whistleblowing and objections to new NIH policies. After placing Marrazzo on administrative leave, HHS terminated her three weeks after she filed a whistleblower retaliation complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel in September 2025. Marrazzo alleges violations of the Civil Service Reform Act, Fifth Amendment due process, First Amendment retaliation protections, the Whistleblower Protection Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act, seeking reinstatement, backpay, and declaratory relief.

Supporting reports

• Judge Young issues 161-page ruling blocking deportations of pro-Palestinian activists — Judge William Young in Boston issued a scathing 161-page ruling last month finding that Trump administration efforts to deport non-citizen pro-Palestinian activists and academics violated their First Amendment rights and were conducted under an "unconstitutionally broad definition of antisemitism." Young, a Reagan appointee, concluded the deportations lacked due process and constituted a "full-throated assault on the first amendment."

Supporting reports

• Federal grand jury indicted John Bolton for classified information disclosure — A federal grand jury in Maryland indicted former national security advisor John Bolton on eighteen counts: eight counts of communicating secret information to unauthorized recipients and ten counts of unauthorized possession of classified documents. The charges relate to Bolton sharing classified diary material with relatives that later informed his memoir "The Room Where It Happened." The indictment references Bolton's criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of Signal messaging to plan military operations.
• Trump's former National Security Advisor John Bolton was indicted for retaining classified information — John Bolton, Trump's former National Security Advisor, was indicted for keeping more than 1,000 pages of diaries containing highly classified information and sharing them with two relatives. The indictment also notes that Bolton's email account was hacked by Iran, exposing some of the classified secrets.
• John Bolton indicted for mishandling classified information — John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser and prominent critic of the president, was indicted for allegedly mishandling classified information. Bolton faces 18 criminal charges, including eight counts of transmitting national defense information and 10 counts of unlawfully retaining national defense information. In a statement, Bolton said he "look[s] forward to the fight to defend my lawful conduct and to expose [Trump's] abuse of power."
• John Bolton indicted on 18 counts of mishandling classified information — The Department of Justice filed an 18-count indictment against John Bolton, former Trump national security adviser, charging him under the Espionage Act with transmitting and retaining highly classified information. Bolton allegedly sent diary entries containing classified details to two unnamed individuals via personal email and messaging accounts. The grand jury indictment was handed down in federal district court in Maryland on October 17, 2025. Bolton's defense argues the diaries were personal records shared only with family and known to the FBI since 2021.
• John Bolton pleads not guilty to 18-count indictment for mishandling classified information — Former national security adviser John Bolton surrendered to authorities and pleaded not guilty in Maryland federal court to an 18-count indictment alleging he shared classified diary notes with relatives lacking security clearances, stored classified documents at his home, and sent top-secret information via personal email. Bolton's lawyer characterized the prosecution as political retaliation for his 2020 memoir critical of Trump. Career prosecutors in the Maryland US attorney's office filed the charges, which were initially dropped by the Biden DOJ in 2021 but reopened after the CIA director and FBI director reviewed Bolton's hacked emails.

Supporting reports

• Trump called for DOJ investigations into political opponents — In the Oval Office, Trump stood before three top DOJ officials and called for investigations into former deputy attorney general Lisa Monaco, former FBI official Andrew Weissman, former special counsel Jack Smith, and Representative Adam Schiff. The DOJ officials "smiled, nodded and shuffled in place" as Trump spoke. This represents a direct presidential directive to weaponize the Justice Department against perceived political enemies.
• Trump called for prosecution of Andrew Weissmann, Lisa Monaco, and Adam Schiff — Trump publicly called for the prosecution of former DOJ official Andrew Weissmann, former Deputy National Security Advisor Lisa Monaco, and Rep. Adam Schiff, asserting that as "chief law enforcement officer" he is "allowed" to direct such investigations. The statement represents a direct assertion of presidential authority to weaponize law enforcement against political opponents.
• Trump called for investigation of political enemies — Speaking to reporters, Trump called for several of his perceived political enemies to be investigated for what he claimed was "political crime," including former Special Counsel Jack Smith, chief prosecutor in the Mueller investigation Andrew Weissmann, former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and Senator Adam Schiff.

Supporting reports

• Emil Bove confirmed to federal appeals court by US Senate — The Senate confirmed Emil Bove, a former Trump defense attorney and top DOJ official, to a lifetime seat on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals by a 50-49 vote. The confirmation proceeded despite whistleblower allegations that Bove advocated for ignoring court orders, misled Congress about dropping corruption charges against NYC Mayor Eric Adams, and participated in firing prosecutors who worked January 6 cases. All Democrats and two Republicans opposed the nomination.
• Senate confirmed Emil Bove as federal appeals court judge — The Republican-controlled Senate narrowly confirmed former Trump lawyer Emil Bove for a lifetime appointment as a federal appeals court judge, despite whistleblower allegations and widespread concerns over his fitness for office, including from over 900 former DOJ attorneys who penned a letter opposing his appointment.
• Senate confirms Emil Bove to federal judgeship despite whistleblower allegations — The Senate confirmed Emil Bove to a federal judgeship on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals with 50 Republicans voting in favor and 47 Democrats voting against. Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) joined Democrats in opposition, with Murkowski stating that someone who counseled attorneys to ignore court orders should not receive a lifetime seat on the bench. Republican Thom Tillis (R-NC) voted in favor, illustrating Republican enablement of the administration's assault on the rule of law.
• Emil Bove confirmed to US Court of Appeals for Third Circuit on 50-49 Senate vote — The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed Emil Bove to a lifetime appointment on the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on a 50-49 vote, despite opposition from over 80 retired judges and three whistleblowers alleging serious ethical violations. Bove, who served as acting deputy attorney general, faced allegations of disregarding court orders, firing prosecutors for political reasons, and pressuring DOJ lawyers to defy judicial rulings. The Senate Judiciary Committee chair dismissed whistleblower concerns as "delay-and-obstruction tactics" without substantive investigation.

Supporting reports

• Rep. Jim Jordan subpoenaed DOJ prosecutor who investigated Trump — Republican Rep. Jim Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, issued a subpoena to a DOJ prosecutor who investigated Trump under special counsel Jack Smith in cases related to Trump's retention of classified documents and efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Supporting reports

• Mark Zaid files lawsuit challenging security clearance revocation — National security lawyer Mark Zaid filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging the revocation of his security clearance. The lawsuit argues the revocation order was unconstitutionally vague, violated due process rights, and impeded First Amendment protections for free speech, association, and the right to petition the government. Zaid contends the action was politically motivated retaliation for his representation of whistleblowers and public criticism of Trump. The lawsuit seeks reinstatement of his clearance and aims to hold the administration accountable to the rule of law. Oral arguments were heard on June 27, 2025.

Supporting reports

• DOJ leader allegedly suggested defying court orders on deportations — Emil Bove, the Department of Justice's principal associate deputy attorney general and Trump nominee for the US Court of Appeals, reportedly told staff the department "would need to consider telling the courts 'fuck you'" regarding orders blocking deportations of undocumented people. Former DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni, in a whistleblower letter to Congress, alleged Bove made these comments in mid-March during discussions about invoking the Alien Enemies Act. Reuveni further claimed he witnessed DOJ officials systematically undermining court orders through lack of candor, deliberate delay, and disinformation, and that he was fired on April 11 after refusing to misrepresent facts in court filings.
• DOJ official Emil Bove stated DOJ would ignore court orders on deportations — DOJ lawyer Erez Reuveni, who was subsequently fired, came forward as a whistleblower to Congress and the DOJ inspector general. Reuveni stated that senior DOJ official Emil Bove announced plans to invoke the Alien Enemies Act for swift deportations and, when asked about potential judicial intervention, said the DOJ might have to tell courts "fuck you" and proceed with deportations regardless of legal injunctions. Reuveni reported that the statement was met with stunned silence among senior DOJ officials present.
• New York Times reported DOJ official Emil Bove told subordinates to ignore court orders — On June 24, the New York Times reported on a whistleblower complaint alleging that senior Justice Department official Emil Bove told his subordinates he would ignore court orders to further Trump's mass deportation efforts. Bove, who once served as Trump's criminal defense attorney and was recently nominated to serve as a federal appeals judge, later denied the comments during his confirmation hearing, saying "I have never advised a Department of Justice attorney to violate a court order."
• DOJ whistleblower Erez Reuveni filed complaint about defying court orders — On June 24, 2025, Erez Reuveni, a former Department of Justice lawyer, filed an official whistleblower complaint alleging that DOJ leaders and the White House deliberately defied court orders and "engaged in unlawful activity, abused their authority, created substantial and specific threat to health and safety." Reuveni was fired after telling a court that the administration had made an error when it rendered Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to CECOT despite a court order not to do so. In the complaint, Reuveni alleged that Emil Bove insisted planes carrying men to El Salvador must take off and said DOJ "would need to consider telling the courts 'f*ck you' and ignore any such court order."
• Bove fired DOJ prosecutors who investigated January 6 Capitol attack — Emil Bove issued a memo terminating dozens of DOJ prosecutors who had worked on cases related to the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack, characterizing their prosecutions as a "grave national injustice." Bove justified the firings by claiming the prosecutors had been hired as temporary employees under the Biden administration and converted to permanent status, and that they were preventing a particular U.S. attorney from fully staffing his office. The terminations were carried out in furtherance of a Trump executive order.
• Whistleblower complaint filed alleging DOJ official directed defiance of court orders — Former DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni filed a whistleblower complaint alleging that Emil Bove, principal associate deputy attorney general, instructed prosecutors to disregard judicial rulings against Trump's immigration policies. The complaint surfaced hours before Bove's Senate confirmation hearing for a federal appeals court judgeship. Bove denied the allegations under oath, stating he has "never advised a Department of Justice attorney to violate a court order."
• Emil Bove denies whistleblower allegations of directing DOJ staff to defy court orders on immigration — Emil Bove, principal associate deputy attorney general and Trump's nominee for federal appeals court judge, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 25, 2025, denying a whistleblower complaint filed by former DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni. Reuveni alleged Bove instructed prosecutors to tell courts "fuck you" when ruling against Trump's immigration policies. Bove also denied Democratic allegations that he dropped corruption charges against NYC Mayor Eric Adams to secure his cooperation with immigration enforcement. Republicans signaled support for his nomination while Democrats characterized him as weaponizing the DOJ against Trump's political opponents.

Supporting reports

• Pentagon inspector general launches investigation into Defense Secretary Hegseth's use of Signal app for discussing classified military operations — The Department of Defense inspector general announced an investigation into Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of the encrypted messaging app Signal to discuss sensitive information about US military operations in Yemen. The probe was triggered by a bipartisan Senate Armed Services Committee request after reports that highly classified intelligence—including strike timing and aircraft models—was shared in a Signal group chat that included journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of the Atlantic. Investigators will examine compliance with classification and records retention requirements.
• Pentagon inspector general reviews Hegseth's Signal chat participation — The acting inspector general at the Pentagon announced on April 3 that he would review Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's participation in the Signal group chat that included plans for a military strike in Yemen. The review examines potential violations of records retention and oversight protocols.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department announces launch of Joint Task Force October 7 — The Department of Justice announced the establishment of Joint Task Force October 7 (JTF 10-7), a multi-agency counterterrorism initiative led by Attorney General Pamela Bondi. The task force will target perpetrators of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, pursue charges against Hamas leadership, investigate support networks and financing for Hamas and affiliated groups, and prosecute acts of antisemitism. The task force includes prosecutors from the National Security Division, Civil Rights Division, Criminal Division, and FBI personnel, with coordination through the FBI's Legal Attaché office in Israel.