Trump Action Archive

A searchable record of documented actions, compiled weekly from public sources.

2 events matching

Export CSVResearcher JSONAnalyst Newest first · Oldest first
Filtering Attack target: Voting Rights × Trait: Courts issue rulings aligned with donor or elite preference × Clear all ☆ Save this search
Lower-confidence events are a Researcher feature. See plans →

Narrow these 2 — tap a value to filter:

Category 2
Tier 1 carried by a primary record Corroborated 2+ independent news desks Every result is verified and democracy-related.

Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions

Oct 8, 2026 Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled that DOJ's collection of unredacted state voter rolls for cross-checking against immigration databases was unlawful Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

The ruling blocks a federal attempt to seize control of voter-roll data from states, protecting citizens from erroneous removal from registration lists ahead of the midterms.

Independently corroborated by4 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Federal judge voids DOJ policy collecting state voter rolls — US District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan ruled that the Trump administration's Department of Justice policy of collecting unredacted state voter rolls to cross-check against a federal immigration database violated federal privacy laws and exceeded DOJ authority. The policy, adopted under Trump's election integrity executive order, had already removed US citizens from voter rolls and risked further disenfranchisement. Sooknanan found Congress, not the federal government, controls voter roll maintenance. The lawsuit was brought by Common Cause after roughly 18 states complied with DOJ requests in May, providing voters' names, birth dates, addresses, and partial identification numbers.
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 90 – 2026-10-03–2026-10-09 wk90_IG_018
May 8, 2026 Samuel Alito issued a majority opinion gutting the Voting Rights Act that relied on misleading DOJ-supplied voter-turnout data Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation

A landmark voting rights ruling was premised on a manipulated statistical methodology, undermining the factual integrity of the decision.

Independently corroborated by1 independent news desk
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Samuel Alito's Voting Rights Act ruling cited misleading DoJ data on voter turnout — Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act relied on voter turnout data from a Department of Justice friend-of-the-court brief that used a non-standard, misleading methodology. The DoJ calculated Black and white voter turnout as a proportion of total population over 18, including non-citizens and ineligible voters, rather than the standard citizen voting age population measure. When recalculated using standard methodology, Black voter turnout in Louisiana exceeded white turnout in only one of five recent elections, not two as Alito claimed. Experts identified the approach as deliberately manipulative.
Verified: Corroborated — 2+ independent news desks Week 68 – 2026-05-02–2026-05-08 wk68_IM_029