Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• DHS whistleblower alleges voter impersonation by federal agents — A Department of Homeland Security whistleblower alleged that DHS, as part of its "Unlawful Voter Initiative," directed federal agents to impersonate voters in violation of state laws, using Social Security numbers and other information to look up voter history on state websites. The allegation prompted US Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff to request an investigation by California's attorney general, citing concerns about how DHS obtained and used voter data and whether it complied with law.

Supporting reports

• Trump posted digitally altered image on social media showing him with Xi Jinping — Trump posted an image on his social media account showing himself and Xi Jinping standing together on a red carpet in front of an airplane labeled Air China, with a military aircraft flying over a circle of stars and "Only Trump" superimposed in blackletter font. Journalist Aaron Rupar of Public Notice identified the image as digitally altered, with the chief officer of protocol Monica Crowley's image replaced by what appears to be Trump aide Natalie Harp.

Supporting reports

• White House justified press ban by accusing Politico of threatening national security — The White House press office dispatched a letter to Politico attempting to justify the president's ban on the news organization. In the letter, made public through a government court filing, the White House accused Politico of publishing stories that "have threatened national security and/or spread falsehoods." The White House singled out six stories, including a June 2026 article citing a "senior admin official" who assessed the odds of a U.S.-Iran deal at 80-85%. That official was identified as Vice President JD Vance speaking on a background call with reporters authorized by the White House.

Supporting reports

• Trump announced potash deal with Belarus — Trump posted that the United States is working on a deal to purchase potash from Belarus at substantially lower prices than current Canadian suppliers, describing it as good news for farmers and ranchers. NBC reported that Belarus is Russia's closest ally and currently subject to U.S. sanctions. Social media commenters noted that Belarus has no available potash due to sanctions forcing production into long-term contracts with China, Russia, and Asian markets, and that the logistics of importing from Belarus would cost 8-10 times more than the claimed savings.

Supporting reports

• Federal lawsuit filed challenging White House press ban — On September 21, CNN, MS NOW, and Politico filed a federal lawsuit challenging the White House's ban on their journalists. The organizations argue that the exclusions violate First Amendment rights and are retaliatory based on their reporting. The Trump administration contends that White House access is a privilege tied to national security, not a constitutional right. Federal Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee, is scheduled to hear the news organizations' emergency request for temporary restoration of access on September 23 at 3:30 p.m. Eastern.
• CNN, MS Now, and Politico file federal lawsuit challenging White House journalist ban — Three news organizations filed a federal lawsuit on Monday against the Trump administration seeking a temporary restraining order to block enforcement of the journalist ban and restore press credentials. The lawsuit argued the ban violated First Amendment rights to free press and access to government information. The suit came after Secret Service confiscated press badges from reporters on Saturday following Trump's announcement of the ban via Truth Social.
• CNN, MSNBC, and Politico file lawsuit challenging media ban — On September 21, CNN, MSNBC, and Politico filed a federal lawsuit against Trump, communications director Steven Cheung, Secret Service director Sean Curran, and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, alleging violations of the First and Fifth Amendments. The lawsuit characterizes the ban as retaliation for negative news coverage and states that Trump banned the outlets because he deemed their reporting "negative" and to chill future reporting about his administration. The plaintiffs seek restoration of their press credentials for White House coverage.
• Judge Timothy Kelly assigned to media ban lawsuit — U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, appointed to the bench by Trump in 2017, was assigned to hear the lawsuit filed by CNN, MSNBC, and Politico challenging the White House media ban. Judge Kelly ordered the government to respond to the lawsuit by the following day and scheduled a hearing for Wednesday afternoon at 3:30 p.m. Trump responded by complaining that the outlets "have drawn a great Judge, for them, a man who ruled in favor of Jim Acosta" in 2018, and vowed to appeal any adverse ruling.
• CNN, MS Now, and Politico sue Trump administration over White House press badge revocation — Three major news organizations filed a federal lawsuit in US District Court for Washington DC on Monday, September 21, seeking to regain White House access after their journalists' credentials were revoked on Saturday. The revocation followed Trump's announcement via Truth Social that the outlets would lose access due to their coverage. The plaintiffs argue the ban violates the First Amendment and Fifth Amendment, claiming retaliation based on viewpoint and lack of due process. They seek a temporary restraining order to immediately restore access while litigation proceeds.
• Complaint filed: Cable News Network, Inc. v. Trump (D.D.C. 1:26-cv-03287) — CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and POLITICO, along with three of their White House correspondents, filed a complaint in D.D.C. challenging President Trump's Sept. 18, 2026 ban on the three news organizations from White House grounds. The ban was announced as retaliation for "FAKE NEWS" reporting and took effect Sept. 19, 2026, when Secret Service officers denied entry and confiscated press credentials. Plaintiffs allege violations of the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause (deprivation of liberty and property interests without notice or hearing) and the First Amendment (unlawful retaliation against protected speech and viewpoint discrimination). They seek declaratory and injunctive relief, including immediate restoration of credentials and access.
• MS NOW, CNN, and Politico filed lawsuit against Trump's White House press ban — Three major news outlets filed a federal lawsuit challenging Trump's total ban on their access to the White House. The lawsuit argues the ban violates the First Amendment and constitutional principles protecting press credentials and access. The outlets contend that while presidents may disagree with coverage, the Constitution protects news organizations' liberty and property interests in press credentials and the access they afford for public benefit.

Supporting reports

• White House launches "Trump TV" feed as alternative to independent news coverage — After major networks suspended pool coverage in protest of the journalist ban, the White House promoted its own online video feed branded "Trump TV," featuring administration-selected content with messaging emphasizing direct delivery "straight from the Trump Administration" without "noise." The feed was positioned as an alternative to independent news coverage, allowing the administration to control the narrative and distribution of presidential imagery and announcements.
• White House launches "TRUMP TV" streaming channel — On September 21, the White House YouTube channel announced the launch of "TRUMP TV: The Essentials Station" scheduled to begin at 7:00 p.m. The channel disabled the comment feature, preventing viewer interaction or criticism. The launch followed Trump's ban on major news outlets and the networks' refusal to provide press pool coverage, representing an attempt to bypass traditional media and deliver unfiltered messaging directly to the public.
• White House launches Trump TV streaming channel — Hours after the September 21 lawsuit was filed, the White House launched Trump TV, a 24-hour YouTube stream featuring presidential speeches and administration highlights. The channel provides government-selected programming as an alternative to independent news coverage. Unlike independent journalism, Trump TV's content is curated by the Trump administration and does not include investigation of official claims, questioning of officials, or reporting of information absent from official communications.

Supporting reports

• White House promotes official mobile application for news distribution — The White House promoted "The White House App" on social media, advertising it as a way to "[g]et real-time updates and live events streamed DIRECTLY to your phone. No noise. Just the news that matters most—straight from the Trump Administration." The promotion occurred after Trump banned major news outlets and launched a government-controlled television channel. Users responded critically, with comments expressing concerns about government surveillance and the app functioning as propaganda or spyware.
• White House App Hits No. 1 in News and Cracks App Store Top 20 as Americans Tune Out Fake News — The White House published this release on 2026-09-23 through its releases channel.

Supporting reports

• Trump responded to press ban lawsuit on Truth Social — Trump posted a response to the lawsuit on Truth Social, stating the White House is not assaulting the free press but rather assaulting "FAKE NEWS," which he characterized as corrupt, coordinated, out of control, and a threat to national security that "must be stopped, NOW."

Supporting reports

• Trump dismisses AI safety concerns and calls regulation a hoax — Trump has repeatedly characterized concerns about artificial intelligence dangers as a "hoax" and a "scam," arguing that government already possesses sufficient regulatory authority over tech companies. This stance contradicts positions held by his own party members, AI company leaders, and the broader scientific community calling for AI safety measures and oversight.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration establishes NIH grant-veto board aligned with presidential agenda — The Trump administration is establishing an executive order creating an external board to approve National Institutes of Health grant funding. The board, to include OMB Director Russell Vought and NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, would require unanimous decisions and could veto biomedical research grants deemed misaligned with Trump's political priorities. This breaks with the NIH's traditional merit-based evaluation process. The move follows administration accusations that the NIH funds "woke" initiatives and comes amid a class-action lawsuit by researchers alleging First Amendment violations through ideological censorship of grant awards.
• Trump directed budget director to create political appointee board for NIH grants — Trump directed his budget director Russ Vought to draft an executive order creating a board of political appointees to decide which grants the National Institutes of Health should fund. This represents another attempt to cut Harvard's funding and place political control over the nation's $48 billion in congressionally-appropriated biomedical research funding. Congress this month signaled disapproval of an earlier Vought plan to give political appointees control of health grants by including a provision in a stopgap funding bill that temporarily blocks the administration from implementing that earlier plan. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins personally rejected Vought's plan.