Narrow these 134 — tap a value to filter:
Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Oct 23, 2025 Greg Abbott issued a proclamation declaring a gang a terrorist organization based on unverified intelligence Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
A governor lent official authority to a later-discredited threat claim, amplifying a false narrative for political purposes.
Supporting reports
- Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued proclamation declaring Tren de Aragua a terrorist organization based on false intelligence — In September 2024, Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued an official proclamation declaring Tren de Aragua a "terrorist organization" and condemning President Biden's "open-border policies," citing the unverified "green light" warning to attack law enforcement. Abbott's public safety director called TdA members "cockroaches." The proclamation weaponized the false intelligence claim for political purposes.
Oct 21, 2025 Stephen Miller denounced a federal judge's ruling as 'legal insurrection' Corroborated Institutions and Governance
A senior White House official used inflammatory language to delegitimize judicial review, risking incitement against the judiciary.
Supporting reports
- Stephen Miller calls Immergut ruling "legal insurrection" — White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller denounced Judge Immergut's ruling as "legal insurrection," using inflammatory language that analysts worry could incite violence against the judiciary.
- Trump attacks Judge Immergut and misidentifies her sex — After Judge Immergut's ruling blocking national guard deployment, Trump publicly attacked her, telling reporters "I wasn't served well by the people who pick judges" (despite having nominated her himself), and misidentified her sex, saying "That judge ought to be ashamed of himself." Trump falsely claimed Portland was "burning to the ground."
Oct 20, 2025 Mike Johnson held a press conference dismissing peaceful No Kings protests as un-American Corroborated Institutions and Governance
Congressional leadership publicly delegitimized a mass peaceful protest, characterizing dissent as extremist rather than legitimate civic expression.
Supporting reports
- House Republicans held press conference dismissing No Kings protests as un-American — Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Whip Tom Emmer, and Rep. Chip Roy held a press conference during a shutdown to attack the No Kings Day protests held the previous weekend. They characterized the demonstrations as a "hate America rally," claimed protesters were celebrating the death of Republicans, and accused Democrats of promoting Marxists and Islamists. The statements were made despite the protests being peaceful and drawing an estimated 5.5 million participants.
Oct 19, 2025 Trump dismissed and baselessly attributed No Kings protests to paid activism by George Soros Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
The president spread unfounded conspiracy theories to delegitimize millions of grassroots protesters, undermining public trust in civic participation.
Supporting reports
- Trump dismissed "No Kings" protests as unrepresentative and baselessly accused Soros of funding them — On October 19, Trump called the "No Kings" protests a "joke" and claimed the nearly 7 million demonstrators were "not representative of the people of our country." He baselessly accused George Soros and other "radical left lunatics" of paying for protest signs and stated his administration was "checking it out." The dismissal and unfounded conspiracy theory contradicted the documented scale and grassroots nature of the protests.
- Trump dismissed No Kings protests and alleged they were paid demonstrations — Trump dismissed the No Kings protests held on the previous Saturday, claiming the crowds were "not big at all" and that protest signs were "all made professionally in a printing shop. Looks like on Madison Avenue someplace." He alleged that "some guy is paying for all that stuff" and characterized protesters as "professional agitators," stating: "We are finding out who's paying them. Yeah. We have a lot of information about who they are. You're gonna be very surprised when you find out."
Oct 19, 2025 Trump dismissed No Kings protests as unrepresentative and baselessly accused Soros of funding them Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
The president spread an unfounded conspiracy theory to delegitimize documented grassroots mass protest, undermining public trust in civic participation.
Supporting reports
- Trump dismissed "No Kings" protests as unrepresentative and baselessly accused Soros of funding them — On October 19, Trump called the "No Kings" protests a "joke" and claimed the nearly 7 million demonstrators were "not representative of the people of our country." He baselessly accused George Soros and other "radical left lunatics" of paying for protest signs and stated his administration was "checking it out." The dismissal and unfounded conspiracy theory contradicted the documented scale and grassroots nature of the protests.
Oct 18, 2025 White House / Trump posted an AI-generated video depicting Trump as an authoritarian ruler dumping excrement on protesters and American cities Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
Official social media used crude propaganda to mock millions of peaceful protesters, normalizing contempt for democratic dissent.
Supporting reports
- Trump posted AI-generated video depicting him as "King Trump" dropping feces on protesters — On Truth Social, Trump posted an AI-generated video showing him flying a fighter jet labeled "King Trump" and dropping feces on protesters participating in the "No Kings" demonstrations. A senior Trump administration official later confirmed to Zeteo that the video depicted excrement, stating "It is shit. A lot of it…What else would that be?" The post was a direct mockery of the nearly 7 million people who had just participated in nationwide protests against his administration.
- President Trump posts AI-generated video depicting himself dropping feces on protesters — On the evening of October 19, 2025 (Saturday night), President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated video on Truth Social showing himself as "King Trump" flying a fighter jet marked with his name over Times Square, dropping a brown liquid resembling feces on "No Kings" protesters. The video featured Kenny Loggins's song "Danger Zone" in the background. Activist Harry Sisson, who appeared to be depicted in the video, publicly questioned why the president posted such content. CNN host Manu Raju noted the significance of the president posting the clip.
- Trump posted AI video of himself defecating on protesters — Trump posted on Truth Social an AI-generated video depicting himself as a fighter pilot wearing a crown, dumping feces from an aircraft onto the heads of No Kings Day protesters, including activist Harry Sisson. The video used Kenny Loggins' "Danger Zone" without permission. Speaker Johnson defended the post as "satire" when questioned by reporters.
Oct 17, 2025 Karoline Leavitt characterized the Democratic Party's constituency as made up of "Hamas terrorists, illegal aliens, and violent criminals" Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
Official White House rhetoric delegitimizing political opposition through inflammatory dehumanizing language undermines civil political discourse.
Supporting reports
- White House press secretary characterized Democrats as supporting terrorists and criminals — White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News Channel that "[t]he Democrat Party's main constituency are [sic] made up of Hamas terrorists, illegal aliens, and violent criminals." This statement represents an official administration effort to delegitimize political opposition through inflammatory rhetoric and false characterization.
- Rep. Hakeem Jeffries criticized White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt — Rep. Hakeem Jeffries criticized White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, stating she is "sick, she's out of control" and questioning whether she is "demented, ignorant, a stone cold liar, or all of the above." Jeffries specifically objected to Leavitt's statement that the Democratic Party consists of "terrorists, violent criminals, and undocumented immigrants," calling it inappropriate for an official White House spokesperson to make during a government shutdown.
Oct 16, 2025 House GOP leadership labeled the nationwide No Kings rallies a "Hate America" event and characterized attendees as extremists Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
Sustained, coordinated rhetoric from House leadership continued to delegitimize a major planned protest ahead of its occurrence.
Supporting reports
- Republican leaders attack "No Kings" protest as un-American and falsely associate it with Hamas, antifa, and paid agitation — House Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Majority Whip Tom Emmer, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, and Senator Roger Marshall publicly attacked the planned "No Kings" protest scheduled for October 18, 2025, characterizing it as a "hate America rally" and falsely claiming attendees would be "pro-Hamas," "antifa people," "paid protesters" funded by George Soros, and prone to violence. The protest, organized by hundreds of groups including the ACLU and Human Rights Campaign, is a peaceful demonstration against Trump administration policies. No evidence supports the claims of paid participation or violent intent; the June 2025 No Kings protest drew 4–6 million largely peaceful participants.
- Administration loyalists characterized No Kings rally as hate rally — Administration loyalists spent the week claiming that the No Kings rally scheduled for Saturday, October 18, is a "hate America rally." The rally, sponsored by Indivisible and scheduled to take place across the country including on the west lawn of the U.S. Capitol, is an anti-authoritarian protest. Indivisible has an extensive track record emphasizing safety and nonviolence. The characterization represents an official effort to delegitimize peaceful protest and mass organizing.
- House GOP Conference Chair Lisa McClain echoed Speaker Johnson's "Hate America" characterization — House GOP Conference Chair Lisa McClain repeated Speaker Johnson's inflammatory framing, stating "We'll see mobs of radicals at the 'I Hate America' rally." This coordinated messaging from Republican leadership amplified the delegitimization of the planned peaceful protests.
- Rep. Dan Meuser characterized "No Kings" rally as "anti-America protest" — Rep. Dan Meuser (R-PA) dismissed the "No Kings" rally as an "anti-America protest," predicting it would draw hundreds of thousands while expressing skepticism about the organizers' claims. This continued the Republican messaging strategy of delegitimizing the planned demonstrations.
- Speaker Johnson labeled "No Kings" rallies "Hate America" rallies, escalating partisan rhetoric — Speaker Mike Johnson repeatedly characterized the nationwide "No Kings" rallies scheduled for October 18 as "Hate America" rallies, describing attendees as "Marxists, socialists, Antifa advocates, anarchists, and the pro-Hamas wing of the far left Democrat Party." Johnson claimed the rallies represent hatred of capitalism, principles, and the rule of law. The rallies, organized by the No Kings coalition, have grown to over 2,600 locations with doubled attendance since Johnson's initial October 10 characterization.
Oct 13, 2025 Mike Johnson and Tom Emmer characterized the No Kings protest as a hate rally and labeled peaceful protesters as terrorists Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
Congressional leaders used inflammatory rhetoric to delegitimize a planned peaceful protest, framing constitutional assembly rights as terrorism.
Supporting reports
- Speaker Mike Johnson characterizes No Kings protest as hate rally — House Speaker Mike Johnson called the No Kings protest scheduled for October 18, 2025, a "hate-America rally" filled with "the Antifa crowd, the pro-Hamas crowd, and the Marxists." House Majority Whip Tom Emmer called millions of peaceful Americans planning to exercise their constitutional right to protest "terrorists."
- No Kings protests scheduled; Republicans attack demonstrations as "Antifa" and "paid" — Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy on Fox News characterized the upcoming No Kings protests (scheduled for October 18) as "Antifa" and "paid protesters," questioning their funding. Speaker Mike Johnson called them "marxist, hate America" rallies. Senator Bernie Sanders countered that the rallies represent millions opposing authoritarianism. The protests have grown in size across multiple events, and Republican messaging has shifted from ignoring them to attacking their legitimacy and funding sources.
- Speaker Johnson calls No Kings rallies "marxist, hate America" — Speaker Mike Johnson characterized the No Kings protests as "marxist, hate America" rallies on Sunday news programs. This framing was disputed by Senator Bernie Sanders and former Representative Tom Malinowski, who noted that the rallies represent constitutional defense and broad-based civic participation.
Oct 6, 2025 Stephen Miller made false claims of nightly 'hand to hand combat' with Antifa in Portland and posted inflammatory rhetoric about 'leftwing terrorism' the day of an arson attack on a judge's home Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
A senior White House official spread demonstrably false claims to justify military deployment and used inflammatory rhetoric the same day a judge's home was firebombed.
Supporting reports
- Stephen Miller made false claims about ICE officer combat in Portland — Stephen Miller stated on CNN that ICE officers engage in "street battles" and "hand to hand combat every night" against Antifa to come and go from their building in Portland. When asked if characterizing protesters as terrorists was hyperbolic, Miller stated it was not and claimed he was "understating the severity of the situation," calling it "a textbook example of domestic terrorism."
- Stephen Miller posted about "leftwing terrorism" on day of judge's house fire — On the same day as the arson attack on Judge Goodstein's home, Stephen Miller posted that "There is a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country. It is well organized and funded. And it is shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general." This post came after the judge had ruled against the administration and after she received death threats.
Oct 4, 2025 Stephen Miller called a court ruling 'legal insurrection' and characterized protest and non-cooperation as terrorism Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
A senior White House official publicly delegitimized judicial authority and reframed law enforcement non-cooperation as a terrorist attack on government.
Supporting reports
- Stephen Miller calls court ruling "legal insurrection" — Following Judge Immergut's decision blocking the Oregon National Guard deployment, Stephen Miller posted that her ruling constituted "[l]egal insurrection." He characterized the decision as "an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers" and asserted that "the deployment of troops is an absolute necessity to defend our personnel, our laws, our government, public order and the Republic itself."
- Stephen Miller posts statement on "leftwing terrorism" — On Saturday afternoon, Stephen Miller posted a statement asserting that "there is a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country. It is well organized and funded. And it is shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general." He called for using "legitimate state power to dismantle terrorism and terror networks," framing political opposition and judicial oversight as terrorism requiring state suppression.
Oct 3, 2025 Trump designated antifa as a major terrorist organization Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
Labeling a decentralized political ideology as terrorism conflates protected speech and assembly with criminal conduct, expanding grounds to target political opponents.
Supporting reports
- Trump designates "antifa" as major terrorist organization — President Trump designated "antifa" as a "major terrorist organization" in late September 2025. The designation is based on an inaccurate narrative that antifa is a centralized organization, when in fact antifa—short for anti-fascist—is an ideology with a loose network of activists rather than a formal organization with membership or hierarchy.
Sep 25, 2025 Trump signed National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 directing federal agencies to investigate and prosecute domestic political violence, targeting nonprofits and left-wing movements Tier 1 · Primary Power and Authority
The memo expands federal investigative power to target political opponents and nonprofit funders under a broad domestic-terrorism framework, risking First Amendment suppression.
Supporting reports
- Trump signs National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 on domestic terrorism — President Trump signed National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), directing law enforcement and regulatory agencies to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations allegedly responsible for encouraging acts of political violence. The memo directs the IRS commissioner to ensure no tax-exempt groups finance political violence or domestic terrorism, and instructs the IRS chief to refer organizations and their employees to the Department of Justice for investigation and possible prosecution. Legal experts and free speech organizations warn the order conflates protected speech with political violence and could be weaponized against left-leaning nonprofits.
- Trump issues presidential memorandum targeting "domestic terrorism" with focus on left-wing groups — On Thursday, President Trump signed a presidential memorandum aimed at investigating and dismantling what he characterized as a radical left-wing "terror network." The memo directs the FBI's joint terrorism taskforces, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Treasury to pursue an "all-of-government effort" against left-wing political violence and antifa. Trump suggested billionaires George Soros and Reid Hoffman could be targets. Critics, including the ACLU, argue the memo uses the label of "domestic terrorism" to target non-profits, activists, and protected political speech, with potential for broad crackdown on political opponents.
- Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum ordering prosecution of protest as federal crime — Three days after the antifa designation, Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7), titled "Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence," which established a National Joint Terrorism Task Force to investigate Americans engaged in protest and ordered the attorney general to prosecute protest as a federal crime to the maximum extent permissible by law.
- Trump signs memorandum targeting activists and nonprofits as "terror network" — President Trump signed a memorandum titled "Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence" that targets activists and nonprofits as part of what he called a "terror network" allegedly fueling violence against Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. The memo alleges that "common threads" include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, anti-Christianity, support for overthrowing the government, and extremism on migration, race, and gender. It grants law enforcement wide latitude to investigate, prosecute, and disrupt entities and individuals engaged in behavior the administration opposes, as well as nonprofit organizations that fund them. The memo also orders law enforcement to interrogate people regarding entities organizing actions and their financial sponsorship prior to adjudication or plea agreement.
- White House issues fact sheet on National Security Presidential Memorandum establishing domestic terrorism strategy — The White House issued a fact sheet on September 25, 2025, describing a National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) signed by President Trump that directs federal agencies to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle organized political violence and domestic terrorism. The memorandum instructs the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force to coordinate investigations; directs the Attorney General to prosecute federal crimes related to organized political violence and recommend groups for designation as "domestic terrorist organizations"; instructs Treasury to identify and disrupt funding networks; and designates domestic terrorism a "National Priority Area." The fact sheet cites recent incidents including the assassination of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and attacks on ICE officers.
- Presidential Memorandum directs federal law enforcement to investigate and prosecute domestic terrorism and organized political violence through coordinated task forces, financial tracking, and organizational designation authority. — National Security Presidential Memorandum-7, signed September 25, 2025, directs the Secretaries of State, Treasury, and Homeland Security and the Attorney General to establish a comprehensive federal strategy countering domestic terrorism and organized political violence. The memorandum instructs the National Joint Terrorism Task Force to investigate individuals and organizations engaged in political violence, radicalization, doxing, and intimidation campaigns; directs the Treasury Department to identify and disrupt financial networks funding such activity; authorizes the Attorney General to designate groups meeting the statutory definition of "domestic terrorism" as domestic terrorist organizations; and mandates law enforcement agencies to interrogate suspects regarding organizational structures and funding sources. The memorandum identifies "anti-fascist" movements as a primary focus and cites recent assassinations, ICE facility attacks, and riots as justification for the expanded investigative authority.
- White House issued National Security Presidential Memorandum directing domestic terrorism investigations and prosecutions — The White House issued NSPM-7 on September 25, 2025, directing the National Joint Terrorism Task Force, Department of Justice, Department of Treasury, and Department of Homeland Security to investigate, prosecute, and disrupt entities and individuals engaged in political violence and intimidation. The memorandum directs law enforcement to investigate funding sources, organizational structures, and participants in acts characterized as domestic terrorism, with particular focus on what the document describes as "anti-fascist" movements. It instructs the Attorney General to prosecute federal crimes related to these investigations to the maximum extent permissible by law and authorizes the Treasury to deploy investigative tools to trace funding streams.
- Trump signed memorandum designating antifa as domestic terrorist organization — President Trump signed a separate presidential memorandum claiming to designate antifa, described as a leaderless and decentralized anti-fascist movement, as a "domestic terrorist organization." Legal experts warned that through this memo and the concurrent nonprofit-targeting memo, Trump is less concerned with curbing political violence and more concerned with stamping out an idea and creating a tool to use against any form of left-wing protest activity.
- Trump signed presidential memorandum targeting left-wing nonprofit organizations — President Trump signed a presidential memorandum directing the federal government to investigate and target liberal nonprofit organizations that fund the political left, specifically naming Democratic megadonors George Soros and Reid Hoffman. The memo ordered the Department of Justice and Department of Treasury to use anti-terrorism financial tools against unspecified organizations and directed the IRS commissioner to ensure that no tax-exempt entities finance political violence or domestic terrorism. Legal experts observed that the memo largely targets actions protected by the First Amendment by conflating speech and violence, and violates federal guidelines prohibiting law enforcement from investigating Americans based solely on First Amendment-protected activity.
Sep 24, 2025 Unidentified shooter opened fire at an ICE detention facility in Dallas, killing one detainee and wounding two before dying by suicide Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
A deadly attack on a federal immigration facility, quickly politicized by officials, reflects escalating violence tied to immigration enforcement.
Supporting reports
- Trump announces planned executive order to dismantle "domestic terrorism networks" in response to ICE facility shooting — Following the Dallas ICE facility shooting, President Trump posted on social media characterizing the incident as an attack by "Radical Left Terrorists" and blamed "radical left Democrats" for anti-ICE rhetoric. Trump announced he would sign an executive order "this week to dismantle these Domestic Terrorism Networks," referencing ANTIFA, which he stated had already been declared a terrorist organization. Law enforcement officials stated there was no indication the shooter had any connection to any organizations, including antifa.
- ICE facility shooting in Dallas; political responses diverge on cause and victims — A shooting at a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office in Dallas killed one detainee and wounded two others. The shooter died by self-inflicted gunshot. The DHS confirmed detainees were the victims. Trump, Vance, Noem, and Abbott blamed the "radical left" and anti-ICE rhetoric for the attack, while Democrats focused on the victims being detainees, called for gun control, and accused Republicans of politicizing the incident for partisan gain. The FBI recovered shell casings with "anti-ICE messaging" but said the investigation was ongoing and the motive had not been confirmed.
- Shooting at Dallas ICE facility kills one detainee, injures two others; shooter dies by self-inflicted gunshot — A suspect opened fire at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office in Dallas on the morning of September 24, killing one detainee and injuring two others who were in critical condition. The shooter, identified as 29-year-old Joshua Jahn, died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Shell casings recovered at the scene bore anti-ICE messaging. The FBI is investigating the incident as an act of targeted violence. No law enforcement officers were injured.
- Shooting at ICE detention facility in Dallas; suspect killed one detainee and wounded two others — On September 24, 2025, a 29-year-old suspect, Joshua Jahn, opened fire from a rooftop at an ICE detention facility in Dallas, Texas, killing one ICE detainee inside a transportation van and critically wounding two others. Authorities found detailed planning notes at his residence expressing anti-ICE sentiment and intent to maximize lethality against ICE personnel. The suspect used ICE tracking apps to monitor federal agents and legally obtained his firearm in August. He died by suicide at the scene. The FBI characterized the attack as involving "high degree of planning."
- Shooting death of detainee at ICE facility in Dallas; widow speaks out — Miguel García-Hernández, 31, an undocumented immigrant detained by ICE in Dallas on 24 September 2025, was shot and killed when a gunman opened fire outside the ICE field office where he was awaiting intake in a government van. He died on 29 September from his gunshot wounds. His widow, Stephany Gauffeny, reported he was restrained to a hospital bed with handcuffs on his feet as he lay dying. She attributes the shooting to rising political violence and anti-immigration rhetoric under the Trump administration. García-Hernández had been seeking legal status through a Biden-era family reunification program that was blocked by a federal judge.
- Shooting at Dallas ICE facility kills one detainee, wounds two others — A gunman fired at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office in Dallas on September 24, killing one detainee and critically wounding two others before dying from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Law enforcement recovered shell casings with "anti-ICE messaging" near the shooter, identified as 29-year-old Joshua Jahn. No federal agents were injured. The incident occurred at a facility used for short-term processing of people in custody along Interstate 35 East.
- ICE reports 700% increase in assaults from "activists masquerading as immigrant advocates" — ICE officials claim a 700% increase in assaults from what they characterize as "activists masquerading as immigrant advocates," citing incidents including vehicle ramming (July 2), armed attack on Prairieland detention center (July 4), and shooting at CBP facility in McAllen (July). The FBI offered a $25,000 reward for Benjamin Hanil Song, a former marine reservist, in connection with the Alvarado attack. However, counter-narratives document ICE and CBP agents engaging in rough and sometimes violent tactics against detainees and protesters, including masked agents smashing car windows and detaining US citizens based on appearance.
- Shooting at ICE detention facility in Dallas; detainee killed, two wounded, shooter deceased — An unidentified shooter fired on an ICE detention center near Dallas Love Field airport from a nearby roof on Wednesday, killing one detainee and wounding two others before taking his own life. An "anti-ICE" message was found on a bullet at the scene. FBI Director Kash Patel and Trump administration officials quickly attributed the attack to "radical left terrorists," while the incident occurred amid a documented spike in violence targeting immigration enforcement facilities and reported aggressive ICE tactics against detainees and protesters.
- Trump and NRCC attribute ICE shooting to "radical left terrorists" and Democratic rhetoric — Following the Dallas ICE facility shooting, President Trump and the National Republican Congressional Committee issued statements attributing the attack to "radical left terrorists" and blaming Democratic rhetoric for demonizing ICE agents. NRCC spokesperson Mike Marinella claimed "radical Democrats" have been escalating rhetoric against law enforcement, drawing a parallel to recent violence against rightwing figures despite senior Democrats condemning political violence generally.
Sep 20, 2025 Lindsey Halligan obtained a grand jury indictment of James Comey days after her appointment, over career prosecutors' objections Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
A politically appointed prosecutor with no experience secured an indictment against a former FBI director despite internal recommendations against charging, exemplifying weaponized prosecution.
Supporting reports
- Prosecutor Halligan obtains grand jury indictment of James Comey — Days after her appointment, prosecutor Lindsay Halligan obtained a grand jury indictment against former FBI Director James Comey for obstruction of justice and making false statements to Congress. Comey pleaded not guilty, with his lawyers arguing that the charges constitute vindictive prosecution by the president.
- DOJ announced indictment of former FBI Director James Comey on obstruction and false-statement charges — The Department of Justice announced that a federal grand jury indicted former FBI Director James Comey on charges of obstructing a congressional investigation into disclosure of sensitive information (18 USC 1505) and making a false statement (18 USC 1001). The indictment alleges Comey falsely stated he did not authorize an FBI employee to be an anonymous source. Attorney General Pamela Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel issued statements characterizing the indictment as reflecting DOJ's commitment to accountability and the FBI's effort to restore public trust.
- U.S. Attorney Halligan secured indictment against former FBI Director James Comey — Lindsey Halligan, a Trump-installed temporary U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia with minimal prosecutorial experience, secured an indictment against former FBI Director James Comey on charges of making false statements to a Senate committee in September 2020 and obstructing a congressional investigation. The indictment came over the objections of career prosecutors in the district and was presented by Halligan alone before a grand jury—a highly unusual procedure for such a high-profile, politically charged case. Comey is scheduled for arraignment on October 9, 2025, in Alexandria, Virginia.
- Federal grand jury indicts James Comey on false statement and obstruction charges — A federal grand jury in the eastern district of Virginia indicted former FBI director James Comey on September 25, 2025, on charges of making a false statement and obstructing a congressional investigation. The indictment relates to Comey's September 2020 testimony to Congress regarding whether he authorized FBI personnel to be anonymous sources in news stories. The indictment was presented by Lindsey Halligan, a White House aide with no prosecutorial experience who replaced a career prosecutor fired after refusing to bring charges against New York attorney general Letitia James.
- Indictment of James Comey on charges of lying to Congress — Former FBI director James Comey was indicted Thursday in the Eastern District of Virginia on one count of making a false statement to Congress and one count of obstruction of a congressional proceeding, related to testimony given five years prior during a hearing on the FBI's Russia investigation. The indictment followed the forced removal of US Attorney Erik Siebert, who reportedly found no grounds to indict Comey, and his replacement with Trump loyalist Lindsey Halligan with limited prosecutorial experience. Democrats and legal experts characterized the action as weaponization of the justice system for political retribution.
- James Comey indicted on false statements and obstruction charges — Former FBI director James Comey was indicted by a federal grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, on Thursday on two felony counts: making false statements to Congress and obstruction of a congressional proceeding. The charges relate to Comey's September 2020 testimony about the Russia investigation, specifically allegations that he falsely claimed he had never authorized FBI leaks to the media. The indictment followed Trump's directive to Attorney General Pam Bondi to "move now" against Comey and came after Trump fired the previous federal prosecutor who had declined to bring charges due to insufficient evidence.
- DOJ expected to indict James Comey before statute of limitations expires — Three sources told MSNBC that Lindsey Halligan is expected to attempt to get a grand jury to indict former FBI Director James Comey before the five-year statute of limitations on lying to Congress expires in six days. Bloomberg reported the Department of Justice is also pushing forward with the case against New York Attorney General Letitia James.
- Federal grand jury indicts former FBI director James Comey for allegedly lying to Congress and obstructing investigation — A federal grand jury indicted former FBI director James Comey for allegedly lying to Congress and obstructing an investigation. The indictment came days after Trump demanded that the Department of Justice prosecute those he perceives as enemies, and after Trump replaced acting U.S. attorney Erik Siebert—who had concluded there was insufficient evidence to charge Comey—with White House aide and Trump's former personal lawyer Lindsey Halligan. Sources indicated Halligan was expected to pursue the indictment before the five-year statute of limitations expired.
- Indictment of James Comey allegedly based on false evidence presented to grand jury — Ken Dilanian reported that the indictment of James Comey appears to attribute words to Comey that he never uttered. Comey testified to Senator Ted Cruz that he stood by his 2017 testimony but did not state in a 2020 hearing that he had not "authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports." Legal analysts including Andrew McCarthy stated the indictment appears premised on a false claim that Andrew McCabe said Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal, which McCabe never said.
- DOJ indicts former FBI director James Comey on false statement charges — The Justice Department indicted former FBI director James Comey in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, on two counts of making false statements to Congress in September 2020. Prosecutors alleged Comey misled lawmakers by claiming he had never authorized anyone at the FBI to leak to reporters, when he had in fact authorized Columbia law professor Dan Richman to leak information about an investigation into Hillary Clinton. The case was considered weak by prosecutors and observers; the grand jury barely met the threshold to approve charges, with only 14 of 23 jurors voting for the false statement count.
- Trump-ordered indictment of former FBI Director James Comey filed by newly appointed US Attorney — Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted on two felony counts by a grand jury presented by newly appointed US Attorney Lindsey Halligan. Trump posted on Truth Social celebrating the indictment, calling Comey "one of the worst human beings this Country has ever been exposed to." Multiple legal analysts, including Fox contributors Andrew McCarthy and Kim Strassel, expressed skepticism that the charges would survive judicial scrutiny, with McCarthy stating he did not believe the case would reach trial. Ken Dilanian reported DOJ sources characterizing the indictment as "among the worst abuses in DOJ history."
Sep 16, 2025 Trump signed executive memo designating Antifa a "major terrorist organization" Tier 1 · Primary Power and Authority
The president claimed authority he does not legally hold to label a decentralized movement as terrorist, opening the door to expanded investigative powers against political opponents.
Supporting reports
- Trump signed executive memo "Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence" — Approximately two weeks after Charlie Kirk's death (mid-September 2025), President Trump signed an executive memo titled "Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence." Citing Kirk's killing, the memo laid groundwork for coordinated efforts by the attorney general, treasury secretary, and IRS commissioner to "investigate, prosecute and disrupt entities and individuals engaged in acts of political violence." Trump designated the leftist Antifa movement a "domestic terrorist organization" despite no such legal designation existing under U.S. law, and instructed the administration to "investigate, disrupt and dismantle" Antifa operations.
- Florida Politics suspends reporter for asking congressman about Kirk shooting — A.G. Gancarski, a reporter with Florida Politics, texted Congressman Randy Fine (R-FL) a question after Charlie Kirk's death asking whether the shooting would affect Fine's position on campus carry legislation. Fine responded by posting both the question and his response online, calling the question "repulsive." Within an hour, the editor of Florida Politics suspended Gancarski, citing lack of "basic empathy." The suspension occurred during the coordinated pressure campaign against Kirk critics.
- Trump designated ANTIFA as a major terrorist organization — Trump posted on Truth Social that he is "designating ANTIFA, A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER, AS A MAJOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATION" and will "strongly recommend" that those funding ANTIFA be investigated. Legal experts noted that the President lacks statutory authority to designate domestic organizations as terrorist groups; only the Secretary of State may designate foreign terrorist organizations under law.
- Trump announces plan to designate antifa as domestic terrorist organization — Donald Trump announced via social media that he plans to designate antifa, a decentralized anti-fascist activist movement, as a "major terrorist organization." Trump called antifa a "SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER" and said he would "strongly recommend" investigating funders. Legal experts and Trump's own former FBI director have noted that antifa lacks the hierarchical structure required for formal designation and that no domestic terrorism statute currently exists to support such a move.
- Trump administration designates Antifa as major terrorist organization — President Trump announced via social media that he is designating Antifa as a major terrorist organization and recommending investigation of those funding it. Legal experts note that no statutory authority exists to designate domestic organizations as terrorist organizations under U.S. law, and such a designation would conflict with First Amendment protections for speech and assembly. The announcement follows the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's television show by ABC after administration pressure.
- Trump Designates ANTIFA as a Major Terrorist Organization — President Donald J. Trump announced via social media that he is designating ANTIFA as a major terrorist organization and recommended that those funding it be investigated. This declaration lacks legal grounds, as government officials can only designate foreign terrorist organizations, not domestic ones. The announcement reflects a broader strategy to divide the American populace into supporters and opponents, undermining democratic norms.
Sep 14, 2025 Christopher Landau suggested visa revocation for speech about Kirk's death Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
A senior diplomat threatened to strip visas from individuals based on protected political speech.
Supporting reports
- Deputy Secretary of State suggested stripping visas from Kirk death celebrants — Christopher Landau, deputy secretary of state, suggested the administration would strip visas from individuals who celebrated Charlie Kirk's death, signaling use of immigration enforcement as a tool for political retaliation.
- Secretary of State Rubio threatens visa revocation for Kirk critics — Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking from Jerusalem on Monday, reiterated threats to revoke visas for foreign nationals who "celebrate" Charlie Kirk's killing or engage in "negative and destructive behavior." Rubio's deputy, Chris Landau, previously instructed consular officers to undertake "appropriate action" when assessing visas for anyone "praising, rationalizing, or making light of" Kirk's death.
Sep 11, 2025 Trump issued a statement blaming 'radical left' rhetoric for the Kirk assassination Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
The statement redirected blame toward opponents while omitting the president's own history of inflammatory rhetoric, distorting the factual narrative around the killing.
Supporting reports
- Trump issued statement blaming "radical left" for Charlie Kirk assassination — Following the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, Trump posted a video statement attributing the killing to "radical left" rhetoric and "radical left political violence," while making no mention of violent attacks against Democratic figures or his own decade of inflammatory rhetoric demonizing political opponents as Marxists, communists, and enemies of America.
- Trump called out radical leftists for violent rhetoric — Former President Donald Trump issued a statement calling out radical leftists for poisonous rhetoric, arguing that years of comparing conservatives like Charlie Kirk to Nazis and mass murderers was directly responsible for terrorism in the country. Trump attributed the assassination to leftist rhetoric without waiting for the investigation to identify the killer's actual motive or affiliation.
Sep 10, 2025 Trump blamed the left for the Kirk killing before the shooter's identity or motive was known Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Attributing an unresolved killing to political opponents before facts emerged exploited tragedy for inflammatory political rhetoric.
Supporting reports
- Trump blamed left for Kirk killing without evidence — Trump issued a video message from the Oval Office in which he said "For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world's worst mass murderers and criminals … My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity, and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it." Trump's warning came despite the fact that the shooter hadn't yet been identified and their motive remained unclear.
Sep 10, 2025 Trump blamed the 'radical left' for the Charlie Kirk shooting and vowed to prosecute organizations that 'fund' political violence Tier 1 · Primary Power and Authority
The president attributed an unsolved killing to political opponents before the shooter's identity was known and threatened prosecution of unnamed groups, raising fears of law enforcement weaponized against dissent.
Supporting reports
- Trump blames "radical left" for Kirk shooting and vows investigation — President Trump addressed the nation from the Oval Office, blaming "the radical left" for the Kirk shooting without evidence. He vowed that his administration "will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity, and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law enforcement officials and everyone else who brings order to our country." Trump listed incidents of what he characterized as "radical left political violence" while omitting violence against Democrats, including the June murder of a Minnesota state lawmaker and her husband by a man with a hit list of 45 Democratic officials.
- Trump blamed shooting on "radical left" and vowed to prosecute contributors to political violence — From the Oval Office, President Trump blamed the Charlie Kirk shooting on "the radical left" and vowed to "find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity, and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country." The statement preceded any confirmed information about the shooter's identity or motive.
Sep 7, 2025 Tom Homan threatened prosecution of protesters and falsely claimed they were paid to demonstrate Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
A senior official's unfounded claims and threats aimed to delegitimize and criminalize protest against administration policies.
Supporting reports
- Tom Homan threatened prosecution of protesters — Fox News pushed a false narrative that protesters against National Guard deployments were being paid. Deportation Czar Tom Homan appeared on Fox and claimed that protesters would be "prosecuted too" if they were financed from outside, suggesting that the government would investigate and prosecute protest organizers.
- Tom Homan falsely claimed protesters are paid by unnamed sources — On Fox News, Trump's border czar Tom Homan stated without evidence that those protesting the administration's immigration crackdown are "absolutely" being paid to do so, and threatened that those funding the protests "will be prosecuted too." The claim was made without providing any factual basis or evidence.
Sep 2, 2025 Trump threatened national guard deployment to Chicago and Baltimore based on false crime claims Tier 1 · Primary Power and Authority
Threatened military deployment to Democratic-led cities relied on inaccurate crime statistics while similar Republican-led cities with higher crime rates were ignored.
Supporting reports
- Trump threatens to deploy National Guard to Chicago and Baltimore, claims Chicago is "world's most dangerous city" — Donald Trump announced plans to deploy National Guard units to Chicago and Baltimore to address violent crime, calling Chicago "the most dangerous city in the world" and citing 20 killings over 2.5 weeks and 75 shootings. He also discussed sending troops to New Orleans. The claims are contradicted by FBI crime data showing Chicago ranks 14th among cities over 100,000 residents in homicide rate (17.5 per 100,000), while the four highest-murder-rate cities—Jackson, Birmingham, St. Louis, and Memphis—are all in Republican-led states with rates ranging from 40.6 to 78.7 per 100,000.
- Texas National Guard preparation to deploy to Chicago reported — According to Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, the Texas National Guard is preparing to deploy to Chicago. Texas Governor Greg Abbott denied the claim. The deployment threat occurs despite Chicago experiencing declining violent crime, with 2025 showing fewer shootings than any year since the mid-1960s according to crime data expert Jeff Asher. Five major Texas cities—Houston, Corpus Christi, Lubbock, Dallas, and San Antonio—had higher violent crime rates per 100,000 people than Chicago in 2024.
- Trump pledges military deployment to Chicago and Baltimore amid false crime claims — President Trump pledged on Truth Social to deploy the military to Chicago and Baltimore, characterizing both cities as exceptionally dangerous. Trump called Chicago "the worst and most dangerous city in the World, by far" and a "killing field," and described Baltimore as "so far gone," a "hellhole," and a "horrible deathbed." However, FBI data shows Chicago ranked 55th in violent crime among major U.S. cities in 2024 (540 per 100,000), with multiple red-state cities including Memphis, Kansas City, Tulsa, and Louisville recording significantly higher rates. Baltimore is experiencing a historic crime decline, with August 2025 recording the lowest homicide count for that month on record and 91 homicides through September 1—the fewest in over 50 years for that period.
- Trump threatens national guard deployment to Chicago; advance ICE team training underway — President Trump reaffirmed his commitment to deploying federal troops to Chicago to address crime and homelessness, calling the city a "hellhole" and stating deployment would proceed regardless of local leadership consent. An advance team of at least 30 agents is undergoing crowd control and flash grenade training at Naval Station Great Lakes; 230 Customs and Border Protection agents are being transferred from Los Angeles. Chicago would become the second city to receive national guard troops after Washington DC (August) and Los Angeles (June). Local officials and community groups are organizing resistance, including legal preparation and "know your rights" campaigns.
Aug 25, 2025 Trump signed an executive order directing prosecution of flag burning despite Supreme Court precedent protecting it as speech Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
Directing prosecutors to criminalize a constitutionally protected form of protest tested First Amendment limits on executive authority.
Supporting reports
- Trump signs executive order directing prosecution of flag burning as incitement or fighting words — President Trump signed Executive Order 14341 on August 25, 2025, directing the Attorney General to prioritize enforcement of federal, state, and local criminal laws against flag desecration, framing such acts as potential incitement to violence or fighting words. The order instructs the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security to deny or revoke immigration benefits for foreign nationals engaged in flag desecration. The order acknowledges Supreme Court precedent (Texas v. Johnson) protecting flag burning as speech but asserts the administration will prosecute flag desecration under content-neutral laws and pursue litigation to clarify First Amendment exceptions.
- Trump ordered DOJ to prosecute flag burning — Trump ordered the Department of Justice to prosecute anyone who burns an American flag, claiming such individuals would automatically face one year in prison. This order contradicts the 1989 Supreme Court ruling in Texas v. Johnson, which established flag burning as protected First Amendment speech.
- Trump announced executive order directing DOJ to prosecute flag burning — Trump held a press event in the Oval Office and announced an executive order instructing the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute instances of flag burning. Trump claimed burning a flag would result in one year in jail and a criminal record. White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf clarified that the order directs DOJ to prosecute flag burning only where it constitutes criminal activity (such as burning someone else's property) and does not violate First Amendment protections, since the Supreme Court previously ruled flag burning as political speech is constitutionally protected.
- Trump issues executive order directing prosecution of flag burning — President Trump issued an executive order on August 25, 2025, directing the Attorney General to prioritize enforcement of federal, state, and local laws against flag desecration. The order instructs the DOJ to prosecute flag burning as a crime where it violates content-neutral laws (disorderly conduct, open burning, property destruction) and authorizes the State Department, Attorney General, and DHS to deny or revoke visas, residence permits, and immigration benefits for foreign nationals engaged in flag desecration. The order acknowledges Supreme Court precedent in Texas v. Johnson but asserts authority to prosecute flag burning that incites imminent lawless action or constitutes "fighting words."
- White House signed executive order directing prosecution of flag desecration — The White House signed Executive Order 14341 on August 25, 2025, directing the Attorney General to prioritize enforcement of criminal and civil laws against flag desecration, including violent crimes, hate crimes, and property crimes. The order instructs the Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Secretary of Homeland Security to deny or revoke visas, residence permits, and immigration benefits for foreign nationals engaged in flag desecration. The order acknowledges Supreme Court precedent in Texas v. Johnson but asserts authority to prosecute flag burning that incites imminent lawless action or constitutes "fighting words."
- Trump signs flag-burning criminalization order — Trump signed an executive order to criminalize the burning of a US flag, an action the Supreme Court ruled was protected under the First Amendment in 1989. The order directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to prioritize prosecuting flag desecration cases and allows officials to deny or revoke visas and residence permits for immigrants who burn flags.
- White House issues fact sheet on executive order prosecuting flag desecration — The White House published a fact sheet on August 25, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump directing the Attorney General to prosecute flag desecration "to the fullest extent permissible" and to "pursue litigation to clarify the scope of First Amendment in this area." The order also directs the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security and the Attorney General to deny, prohibit, terminate, or revoke visas, residence permits, naturalization proceedings, and other immigration benefits for foreign nationals determined to have desecrated the flag, or to seek their removal from the United States.
- Trump signs executive order directing prosecution of flag burning as protest — On Monday, August 26, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order instructing U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue criminal charges against individuals who burn American flags during protests. The order directs prosecutors to explore alternative charges such as disturbing the peace or environmental violations. This action attempts to circumvent the 1989 Supreme Court ruling in Texas v. Johnson, which established that flag burning constitutes protected political speech under the First Amendment.
- Trump signed executive order banning flag burning — Trump issued an executive order criminalizing flag burning. The order drew immediate criticism from conservative legal scholars and right-wing media figures who noted that the Supreme Court had settled in Texas v. Johnson that flag burning constitutes protected free speech under the First Amendment. Multiple conservative commentators, including Justice Antonin Scalia's son, cited the constitutional prohibition on such restrictions.
- Trump issued executive order criminalizing flag burning — President Trump issued an executive order directing arrest and prosecution of Americans for burning the American flag, despite a standing Supreme Court ruling protecting flag-burning as free speech under the First Amendment. Although Trump's order acknowledged the SCOTUS ruling, the Secret Service arrested one man who burned a flag near the White House in protest of the order.
Aug 13, 2025 Kristi Noem attacked a legal app alerting immigrants to ICE locations and threatened prosecution of CNN for reporting on it Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
A cabinet secretary's threats against a legal app and news coverage of it signal potential retaliation against protected speech and press freedom.
Supporting reports
- Kristi Noem attacks IceBlock app and its founder Joshua Aaron — US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem publicly attacked the IceBlock app, which alerts undocumented immigrants to ICE raid locations, claiming it "obstructs justice." Noem stated she wanted to work with the Department of Justice to prosecute CNN for reporting on the app. The app, launched in April 2025 by Joshua Aaron without profit motive, rapidly climbed Apple's app store charts. Aaron claims the app fiercely protects user anonymity while providing real-time safety alerts.
Aug 13, 2025 Attorney General Bondi warned IceBlock app founder Joshua Aaron to "watch out" after Laura Loomer doxed his spouse Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
The nation's top law enforcement officer issued a veiled threat against a citizen developing a constitutionally protected application.
Supporting reports
- Pam Bondi warns Joshua Aaron to "watch out" — Attorney General Pam Bondi publicly warned IceBlock founder Joshua Aaron to "watch out," according to Aaron's account in this interview. Aaron states he consulted multiple constitutional and criminal attorneys before releasing the app and confirmed it is protected under the First Amendment. Bondi's warning came after Laura Loomer doxed Feinstein on X, Tom Homan discussed the matter on Newsmax, and the chain of communication allegedly reached Bondi at the DOJ.