Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Trump made false election claims and attacked institutions at Angel Families event — At a White House event honoring Angel Families, Trump diverted remarks into grievances about polling, false claims about election results, and attacks on institutions that constrain his power. Trump claimed he received 85 million votes (contradicting official results of 78–79 million), dismissed unfavorable polling as "fake polls," and stated "I suffer for the country." The event was intended to honor families affected by crime but became a platform for Trump's personal grievances.
• Trump made unsubstantiated claims of election fraud at crime victims event — At an event honoring families of crime victims, President Trump made unsubstantiated claims that the 2020 election was rigged by "millions and millions of votes," that Democrats engaged in ballot fraud, and that he actually received 85 million votes rather than the reported 78-79 million. He stated "They cheated like hell" and "It was a rigged election." The event was intended to honor crime victims' families but Trump used it to air personal grievances.
• Trump claimed Democrats rigged 2024 election and inflated his vote total — In remarks to "Angel Families" on February 24, 2026, Trump complained about "fake polls" showing his popularity falling and claimed "silent support" exists. He returned to complaints about the 2020 election, which he continues to insist Democrats rigged. Regarding the 2024 election, in which he received approximately 77.3 million votes, Trump claimed: "I won, I got probably 85 million votes...they cheated in this election too." He falsely claimed Republicans do not receive mail-in ballots while Democrats receive multiple ballots, calling Democrats "professional cheaters."

Supporting reports

• Trump posted AI video depicting himself on Olympic hockey team — President Trump posted an AI-generated video on Truth Social showing himself playing on the U.S. Olympic hockey team, beating a Canadian player, and scoring the winning goal. The post came after videos of FBI Director Patel's locker room celebration went viral.
• Trump released AI-generated video depicting violent hockey confrontations — Trump released an AI-generated video depicting himself as a hockey player engaging in violent on-ice confrontations with Canadian opponents. The video was released amid deteriorating polling numbers and served as an example of escalating erratic behavior.

Supporting reports

• FDA loosened labeling requirements for artificial dyes in food — Trump's FDA announced it would loosen labeling requirements to allow companies to claim "no artificial colors" even if products contain substances such as titanium dioxide. The FDA permitted food makers to claim "no artificial colors" as long as dyes are not petroleum-based, despite health experts warning that naturally based additives present health risks. Critics labeled this a "handshake" with Big Food that would deceive consumers while allowing the administration to claim it had addressed artificial dyes.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court rules Trump exceeded authority on tariff imposition — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling that President Trump violated the Constitution by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs on global imports without congressional approval. Chief Justice John Roberts stated that taxation is a core congressional power. The ruling invalidated most of the administration's tariffs. Democratic lawmakers celebrated the decision as a check on executive overreach, while Trump called it a "disgrace" and indicated he had a backup plan.
• Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs unconstitutional in 6-3 decision — The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 last Friday that President Trump exceeded his constitutional authority by imposing tariffs using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) during peacetime. The court affirmed that Congress alone retains the power to levy taxes under the Constitution and that the IEEPA cannot supersede that authority absent genuine emergency conditions. The ruling marked the first time the Supreme Court overturned Trump policies in his second term and undercut his claims to sweeping executive trade authority.
• Supreme Court rules Trump's tariffs unlawful, striking down invocation of International Emergency Economic Powers Act — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that President Trump lacked authority to impose sweeping global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Chief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, joined by two Trump-appointed justices (Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett) and the three liberal-leaning justices. The court held that taxation powers are reserved exclusively to Congress. Trump responded with a vitriolic public attack on the justices, calling them "FOOLS" and "LAPDOGS," and immediately announced new tariffs under different legislative authority.
• Supreme Court strikes down Trump's national emergency tariffs — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision invalidating Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), ruling that tariffs constitute taxation and fall under Congress's exclusive constitutional authority. The decision reduces the U.S. average trade-weighted tariff from 15.3% to 8.3%, with significant reductions on Chinese (36.8% to 21.2%), Brazilian (26.3% to 6.8%), and Japanese (14.9% to 9.9%) imports. Trump immediately announced a 10% blanket global tariff under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act as an alternative.
• US Supreme Court declares Trump's IEEPA tariffs illegal — The US Supreme Court ruled that President Trump cannot impose tariffs in peacetime using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), declaring his tariffs enacted under that authority unlawful. The White House indicated it will replace the levies using alternative statutory tools, such as the 1974 Trade Act. International businesses and governments expressed uncertainty about future tariff regimes, as the ruling does not constrain Trump's other trade policy options. US business groups celebrated the decision as affirming rule of law and separation of powers.
• US Supreme Court rules Trump's tariffs illegal under IEEPA, Trump announces new 10% global tariff under Section 122 — The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling on Friday declaring that Donald Trump's tariffs lacked legal justification under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law designed for national emergencies. The court held that tariff authority belongs exclusively to Congress under the Constitution's taxing power. Trump responded by calling the justices "a disgrace to the nation" and immediately announced a new 10% global baseline tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which permits 150-day tariffs, while initiating investigations into unfair trading practices for potential permanent tariffs.
• US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's unilateral tariff authority under IEEPA — The US Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that President Trump exceeded his constitutional authority by imposing global tariffs without congressional approval under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The decision affirmed lower court findings that the tariffs—covering dozens of countries and announced on "liberation day" in April 2025—were illegal. Trump immediately vowed to continue tariffs using alternative authority under the Trade Act of 1974, announcing a new 10% global tariff and directing investigations into unfair trading practices.
• Supreme Court ruled Trump's tariffs under IEEPA unconstitutional — The U.S. Supreme Court found that tariffs Trump levied under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) are unconstitutional. The decision was announced on Friday, February 21, 2026. Following the ruling, Trump announced a 10% tariff on foreign imports on Friday and escalated to a 15% worldwide tariff on Saturday, claiming the court decision actually granted him broader powers than he previously possessed.
• Supreme Court ruling on tariffs declared unconstitutional — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the tariffs imposed by Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) are unconstitutional. Following this decision, Trump announced a 10% tariff on foreign imports, which he later raised to 15%. He claimed that the ruling inadvertently granted him more power and threatened higher tariffs on countries he accused of taking advantage of the U.S. This ruling has led to significant uncertainty among U.S. trading partners, prompting the European Parliament to pause trade deal approvals with the U.S.
• Trump claims he has unchecked power after Supreme Court ruling — Trump publicly stated that the Supreme Court's ruling has given him "far more powers and strength" than before, suggesting he could use tariffs in a more aggressive manner. His comments reflect a disregard for the Court's authority and the principles of checks and balances.
• Trump’s tariffs face public disapproval — A poll indicated that 64% of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of tariffs, with 82% believing he must obey Supreme Court rulings. This public sentiment reflects widespread dissatisfaction with his economic policies and governance.
• Supreme Court strikes down Trump "liberation day" tariffs — The US Supreme Court struck down Trump's sweeping "liberation day" tariffs that had been imposed the previous year. The decision represented a judicial check on the executive's tariff authority and prompted the administration to announce the alternative 10% global tariff as a replacement policy.
• Supreme Court struck down Trump's broad tariff authority under IEEPA — Days before the State of the Union address, the Supreme Court struck down the President's claimed authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), in what CNBC and CNN reported as one of the most consequential executive power rulings in years. In response, Trump called the ruling "unfortunate" and vowed to pursue "alternative" legal authorities to continue imposing tariffs without congressional approval, signaling his intent to circumvent the Court's decision.

Supporting reports

• Trump demanded Netflix fire Susan Rice — Trump posted on Truth Social demanding that Netflix immediately fire Susan Rice, calling her a "racist, Trump Deranged" political hack with "no talent or skills" and threatening consequences if the company did not comply. Trump questioned her compensation and role at the company.
• Trump threatens Netflix over Susan Rice board membership — On Truth Social, Trump warned Netflix that if it does not fire board member and former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice—who had cautioned corporations and news organizations against capitulating to the current administration—the streaming service will "pay the consequences." The threat came as Netflix was negotiating to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, a deal requiring FCC approval. Netflix subsequently withdrew from the acquisition.

Supporting reports

• Trump announces 10% global baseline tariff under Section 122 of Trade Act — Following the Supreme Court's ruling striking down his IEEPA-based tariffs, President Trump announced a new 10% global baseline tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which permits tariffs for 150 days. Trump stated the administration would initiate investigations into unfair trading practices that could lead to permanent tariffs. Trump framed the court's decision as actually strengthening presidential tariff authority and vowed to enact "very powerful alternatives" to the struck-down tariffs.
• Trump announces 10% global tariff under Section 122 — Following the Supreme Court's invalidation of his national emergency tariffs, Trump announced a 10% blanket global tariff "over and above our normal tariffs already being charged" under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which permits temporary tariffs to address balance-of-payments deficits. This action circumvents the Court's ruling by invoking alternative statutory authority, though Section 122 requires congressional approval to extend beyond 150 days and prohibits country-specific discrimination.
• Trump announces new 10% global tariff under Trade Act of 1974 — Hours after the Supreme Court ruling, President Trump held a press conference announcing he would continue his tariff war using Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 instead of the IEEPA. He announced a new 10% global tariff and directed his administration to conduct investigations into unfair trading practices under other sections of the 1974 Act. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated the new tariffs would result in "virtually unchanged tariff revenue in 2026" and acknowledged the process would be more complicated but ultimately achieve the same outcome.
• Trump announces new 10% global tariff, increases to 15% within 24 hours — After the Supreme Court ruled his tariffs unconstitutional, President Trump announced a new 10% global tariff using different statutory authority and increased it to 15% less than 24 hours later. Trump stated "The policy hasn't changed. The legal tools that implement that may change but the policy hasn't changed," signaling intent to circumvent the court's constitutional ruling through alternative legal mechanisms. Top trade negotiator Jamieson Greer defended the shift as providing US business "leverage" in world trade.
• Trump signals intent to reimpose tariffs via alternative legal authority — At a news conference on 21 February 2026, President Trump stated he would attempt to reintroduce 10 percent tariffs on all countries using a different legal mechanism after the Supreme Court struck down his IEEPA-based tariffs. Trump characterized the court's failure to address refunds as "crazy" and predicted years of litigation. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent similarly suggested refunds could be delayed indefinitely.
• Trump announced 10% tariff on foreign imports following Supreme Court ruling — On Friday, February 21, 2026, immediately after the Supreme Court's decision striking down his IEEPA tariffs, Trump announced he was imposing a 10% tariff on foreign imports, directly contradicting the court's constitutional finding.
• Supreme Court ruled Trump's tariff regime unlawful; Trump announced new tariffs under Section 122 of Trade Act — The Supreme Court struck down Trump's sweeping tariff regime as lacking statutory authority. Within hours, Trump announced a new 10 percent worldwide tariff, raising it to 15 percent by the following morning, claiming authority under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Legal analysis indicates Section 122 permits only temporary import surcharges of up to 15 percent for no more than 150 days, and only when the United States faces a serious international balance-of-payments crisis. The current U.S. balance-of-payments deficit is zero, and no such crisis exists. Trump's new tariff announcement appears to be an attempt to circumvent the Court's ruling through a different legal theory.
• Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs illegal under emergency powers law — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling on Friday declaring that most of Trump's tariffs lacked legal justification under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The court held that tariff authority belongs to Congress during peacetime, not the president. Trump responded by announcing a 15% global tariff under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act. Trade chief Jamieson Greer stated the administration would persist with tariff policy despite the ruling and would not seek congressional authorization for the new tariffs.
• Trump signs global 10% tariff proclamation under Section 122 after Supreme Court blocks tariff authority — President Trump signed a proclamation on February 21, 2026, imposing a temporary 10% tariff on all countries effective February 24, invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The action followed a Supreme Court ruling blocking his use of tariffs. Trump claimed authority under existing statutes without congressional approval. Canada, Mexico, certain food products, and critical minerals were exempted. Trump publicly attacked six justices as a "disgrace to the nation" while praising three dissenters.
• Trump increased proposed global tariff rate from 10% to 15% via social media post — Trump announced via Truth Social that he was raising worldwide tariffs from the initially announced 10% to 15%, invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The announcement claimed the tariffs would take effect "effective immediately," though it remained unclear whether official documents had been signed. This followed Trump's earlier press conference announcement of 10% tariffs and came after the Supreme Court struck down his previous tariff actions as illegal on Friday.
• Trump imposed 10% global tariff under Section 122 of Trade Act of 1974, then raised it to 15% — On February 21, 2026, President Trump announced a 10% global tariff citing Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, then raised it to 15% the following day. Trump invoked this authority immediately after the Supreme Court struck down his previous tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. According to Popular Information's analysis, Trump's invocation of Section 122 is legally defective because the statute authorizes tariffs only in response to "large and serious" balance-of-payments deficits, not trade deficits; the U.S. currently has a zero balance-of-payments deficit, making the tariff legally unsupported.
• Trump announces 15% global tariff under alternative legal framework — Following the Supreme Court's ruling, Trump announced a 15% global tariff on all foreign imports (increased from 10% announced Friday) under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, a different legal framework than the one struck down by the court. Trade chief Greer indicated the administration would not automatically seek congressional authorization for these tariffs, which are set to expire within five months without it.
• Trump escalated tariffs to 15% and claimed court ruling expanded his powers — On Saturday, February 22, 2026, Trump posted that he was raising tariffs from 10% to 15% worldwide, effective immediately. He claimed the Supreme Court's decision "accidentally and unwittingly" gave him "far more powers and strength" than before and that he could "do absolutely 'terrible' things to foreign countries" using tariffs the court had approved.
• Trump administration announced plans to scale back tariffs on steel and aluminum — The Trump administration announced it would review and scale back tariffs on steel and aluminum goods—which had been set at up to 50 percent the previous summer—and exempt some items while halting expansion of the tariff lists. The administration also planned to launch more targeted national security probes into specific goods instead of maintaining broad tariffs. This move was undertaken in response to an affordability crisis damaging Trump's approval ratings.
• Trump invoked Section 122 authority to impose 10% tariff on all imports — Following the Supreme Court's IEEPA ruling, Trump immediately invoked Section 122 of the Tariff Act—an older statutory authority requiring no investigation but limited to 15 percent for 150 days—to impose a 10 percent tariff on all imports from all countries. This action circumvented the Court's restriction on unilateral IEEPA tariffs by relying on a different legal basis Congress had previously authorized.
• Trump raised Section 122 tariff from 10% to 15% — One day after imposing a 10 percent tariff under Section 122, Trump raised the rate to 15 percent—the statutory maximum under that authority. This escalation occurred within the same legal framework but pushed the temporary tariff to its ceiling.
• Trump imposed 15% tariff invoking Section 122 of Trade Act of 1974 — President Trump announced a 15% tariff by invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, days after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down his prior tariff regime as unconstitutional. The administration's trade representative Jamieson Greer defended the move on Sunday shows, claiming the legal tool might change but policy remains consistent. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent declined to commit to refunding approximately $134 billion collected under the now-invalidated tariffs, stating only that the administration would follow the court's direction.
• Administration announces pipeline of tariff investigations to rebuild tariff wall — Treasury Secretary Bessent announced on Sunday that Section 122 tariffs could expire after five months as Section 301 investigations into unfair trade practices and additional Section 232 national security tariffs are lined up to replace them. The administration is using procedural investigations as a mechanism to rebuild the same tariff structure that the Supreme Court struck down, using different legal authorities.
• Trade chief states tariff policy unchanged despite court ruling — On Sunday, U.S. trade negotiator Jamieson Greer told ABC News that the Trump administration would maintain its tariff policy and continue in the same direction, stating "the policy hasn't changed. The legal tools that implement that may change but the policy hasn't changed." Greer also confirmed the U.S. would not back out of bilateral tariff deals with the UK, EU, Japan, Switzerland, and others, despite the court ruling declaring those tariffs illegal.
• Trump delivered longest State of the Union address on record during partial DHS shutdown — President Trump delivered what multiple news outlets reported as the longest State of the Union address in U.S. history on February 24, 2026, while the Department of Homeland Security remained partially shut down since February 14. The address occurred during an active government funding lapse affecting federal workers' paychecks and DHS operations including TSA PreCheck, Global Entry, border security, airport screening, and the Coast Guard. Federal News Network reported it was the first SOTU ever delivered during an active partial government shutdown.
• Trump vowed to continue imposing tariffs despite Supreme Court ruling — During the State of the Union address, President Trump responded to the Supreme Court's striking down of his tariff authority by calling the ruling "unfortunate" and vowing to pursue "alternative" legal authorities to continue imposing tariffs without congressional approval. He also repeated the claim that tariffs are paid by foreign countries, contrary to evidence showing costs are borne primarily by American importers and consumers.
• Trump claimed he does not need Congressional approval for tariffs — Fifteen minutes after his threat post, at 9:49 a.m. on February 24, 2026, Trump posted that "As President, I do not have to go back to Congress to get approval of Tariffs. It has already been gotten, in many forms, a long time ago!" He claimed tariffs were "reaffirmed by the ridiculous and poorly crafted supreme court decision."
• Trump claims he has unchecked power after Supreme Court ruling — Trump publicly stated that the Supreme Court's ruling has given him "far more powers and strength" than before, suggesting he could use tariffs in a more aggressive manner. His comments reflect a disregard for the Court's authority and the principles of checks and balances.
• Trump posted that Supreme Court ruling granted him unchecked tariff power — At 7:06 a.m. on February 24, 2026, Trump posted on social media that the Supreme Court had "accidentally and unwittingly" given him "far more powers and strength" than he had before. He claimed he could use tariffs "in a much more powerful and obnoxious way, with legal certainty" and attacked the court with contemptuous language, writing "supreme court (will be using lower case letters for a while based on a complete lack of respect!)."
• Trump threatened higher tariffs against countries "playing games" — At 9:34 a.m. on February 24, 2026, Trump posted a threat that any country wanting to "play games" with the Supreme Court decision, especially those that have "ripped off" the U.S., would face "much higher Tariff, and worse" than recently agreed tariffs. The post ended with "BUYER BEWARE!!!"
• Trump threatens higher tariffs on foreign countries — Following the Supreme Court's ruling, Trump threatened that any country that "plays games" with the decision would face significantly higher tariffs. He asserted that he does not need Congressional approval for tariffs, claiming that previous approvals were sufficient. This statement reflects his intention to bypass legislative oversight in tariff implementation.
• Trump announced but did not sign 15 percent global tariff order — Trump announced plans to raise global tariffs to 15 percent under the 1974 Trade Act after his IEEPA tariffs were struck down by the Supreme Court. However, he never actually signed the order, meaning the effective tariff rate remained at 10 percent. The announcement was made publicly or on social media but was not formalized through executive action.
• Trump proclaims 10% temporary import surcharge on most goods for 150 days to address balance-of-payments deficit — President Trump issued Proclamation 11012 on February 20, 2026, imposing a temporary 10 percent ad valorem import surcharge effective February 24, 2026, for 150 days under section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. The proclamation cites large U.S. balance-of-payments deficits ($1.2 trillion goods trade deficit in 2024, current account deficit of 4.0% of GDP, and negative net international-investment position of -90% of GDP) as justification. Broad exemptions apply to critical minerals, energy, agricultural products, pharmaceuticals, vehicles, aerospace goods, and articles from Canada, Mexico, and Central American trade partners. The surcharge is in addition to existing tariffs and will be administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
• Trump administration imposes 10% global tariff after Supreme Court strikes down "liberation day" tariffs — Following a Supreme Court decision that struck down Trump's sweeping "liberation day" tariffs imposed the previous year, the Trump administration announced a 10% global tariff on imported articles from every country for 150 days, effective Tuesday. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated the rate would rise to 15% or higher for some countries. The move represents a recalibration of tariff policy in response to the court's rejection of the earlier tariff regime.
• Trump sought Supreme Court rehearing on tariff decision — Trump posted on social media requesting that the Supreme Court reconsider its recent tariff decision, arguing that the ruling "could allow for Hundreds of Billions of Dollars to be returned to Countries and Companies that have been 'ripping off' the USA for many years." Trump asked "Is a Rehearing or Readjudication of this case possible???" Legal experts confirmed that no such rehearing mechanism exists under Supreme Court rules.

Supporting reports

• Trump illegally previewed GDP data before official release — Before the official release of GDP data, Trump illegally previewed the numbers and attempted to shift blame for disappointing results. Senior economic adviser Kevin Hassett later attributed the slowdown to Democrats, claiming the government shutdown shaved two points off growth and suggesting the true trajectory was closer to 3 percent.

Supporting reports

• President attacks justices and invokes Section 122 tariff authority — Within hours of the Supreme Court's ruling, the President issued a proclamation under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 imposing a 10% temporary import surcharge on virtually all imports, effective February 24, then raised it to 15% by Saturday. The President publicly attacked the justices who ruled against him, calling them "fools and lapdogs," praised the three dissenters by name, and alleged foreign influence over the Court. Treasury Secretary Bessent announced the goal is to achieve the same tariff posture through different legal channels with revenue "virtually unchanged."
• Trump responds to tariff ruling with public criticism of justices and announces new tariff order — After learning of the Supreme Court's tariff decision, Trump publicly attacked the justices in the majority, including two he appointed, calling them "fools," "lapdogs," and "unpatriotic." He claimed the Court had been "swayed by foreign interests" and that "obnoxious, ignorant and loud" people had frightened the justices. Trump then announced he would sign an order imposing a 10% global tariff under a different law permitting such action for 150 days, stating he had "the right to do tariffs" and did not need to work with Congress. That evening, he posted on social media confirming he had signed the order, effective "almost immediately."
• Trump held emergency press conference attacking Supreme Court justices — Trump held an unhinged emergency press conference after learning of the tariff ruling during a breakfast meeting with governors. He called the decision a "disgrace," attacked Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett as "fools and lapdogs for the RINOs," and claimed they were "disloyal to our Constitution." Trump alleged without evidence that foreign interests had "undue influence" over the Supreme Court and suggested Democrats should pack the court with 21 justices. He refused to commit to honoring potential refunds of $175 billion in tariffs already collected and claimed he had authority to "destroy the country" through trade actions.
• Trump's angry outburst after tariff ruling — After learning of the Supreme Court's tariff decision during a meeting with governors, Trump abruptly cleared the press from the room and engaged in an angry outburst. Witnesses reported him repeatedly attacking the courts and screaming profanities. Later, in a press conference, Trump called the justices "a disgrace to our nation," "fools," "lapdogs," and "very unpatriotic," with his remarks becoming increasingly unhinged.
• Trump attacked Supreme Court justices and announced plan to circumvent tariff ruling — Following the Supreme Court's decision blocking his emergency tariff authority, President Trump called the justices who ruled against him "very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution," suggested without evidence that they are being swayed by "foreign interests," and announced he will impose a 10% "global tariff" under a different statute—the International Emergency Economic Powers Act—which limits tariffs to 150 days unless authorized by Congress.
• Trump attacked Supreme Court Justices over IEEPA tariff ruling — After learning of the Supreme Court's IEEPA ruling, Trump publicly attacked the three conservative Justices who voted against him, calling them "fools and lapdogs for the RINOs and the radical left Democrats" and accusing them of being "unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution." He also claimed the Court had been "swayed by foreign interests." These statements constituted a direct assault on the judicial branch's independence and legitimacy.
• President attacks Supreme Court justices by name — The President publicly denounced the six justices who voted to strike down the IEEPA tariffs, calling them "fools and lapdogs," alleged that foreign interests had undue influence over the Court, and praised the three dissenters by name. This public attack on the judiciary followed immediately after the ruling.

Supporting reports

• Core PCE inflation rose 3.0% in December, largest increase since February 2025 — The Wall Street Journal reported that core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) inflation, excluding volatile food and energy components, rose 3.0% in December—the largest monthly increase since February 2025. The monthly rise was 0.36%, with October and November figures revised upward slightly. Reuters separately reported that underlying U.S. inflation increased more than expected in December, with signs pointing to further acceleration in January, strengthening expectations that the Federal Reserve would not cut interest rates before June.
• Economic data released showing core PCE inflation at 3 percent and GDP growth at 1.4 percent — Economic data released on Friday showed core PCE inflation running at approximately 3 percent and GDP growth at 1.4 percent during Trump's first year back in office. These figures fall significantly short of the growth projections Trump repeatedly promised during his campaign and early presidency. The weak growth occurs as Trump escalates tariffs, which will function as taxes on American families and businesses during a period of economic strain.
• Fourth quarter GDP growth falls short of projections — Fourth quarter GDP came in at 1.4 percent, significantly below expectations of 3 percent and administration projections as high as 5 percent. Full-year 2025 economic growth was 2.2 percent, the worst year for U.S. economic growth in nine years outside the COVID-19 pandemic. The weak growth occurred alongside inflation readings hotter than expected, with headline PCE at 2.9 percent and core at 3 percent.
• Fourth-quarter GDP growth fell to 1.4% annualized rate — The Commerce Department reported that GDP registered an annualized rate of 1.4% for the fourth quarter (October–December 2025), a marked slowdown from the 3.3% rate in the third quarter and lower than the 1.9% rate economists had projected. Overall, the economy grew by 2.2% in 2025, the slowest pace since 2020. The weak growth came amid tariff-related economic disruption and a government shutdown.
• Personal savings rate fell to 3.6%, lowest since 2022 — Economist Heather Long reported that the personal savings rate fell to 3.6%, the lowest level since 2022. Americans are drawing down savings to maintain spending, a trend that cannot be sustained indefinitely. While tax refunds may provide a temporary income boost in coming weeks, households will eventually need to tighten spending.
• Commerce Department reports U.S. trade deficit widened to $70.3 billion in December — Commerce Department figures released this week show that the U.S. trade deficit widened to $70.3 billion in December, bringing the annual total to $901.5 billion, the largest since data collection began in 1960. This contradicts Trump's public statements that the U.S. trade deficit has sharply declined, undermining a central justification for his tariff policies.

Supporting reports

• Trump invokes Defense Production Act to mandate domestic elemental phosphorus and glyphosate production, delegating authority to Secretary of Agriculture. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14387 on February 18, 2026, invoking the Defense Production Act of 1950 to designate elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides as critical to national defense. The order delegates authority to the Secretary of Agriculture to allocate materials, set nationwide priorities, and issue orders ensuring adequate domestic supply. The EO shields domestic producers from corporate viability risk and grants them immunity under the Act. The order cites phosphorus's role in military devices, semiconductors, and batteries, and glyphosate's role in agricultural productivity.
• Trump issued executive order delegating Defense Production Act authority to Secretary of Agriculture to ensure domestic supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides — President Donald Trump issued an executive order on February 18, 2026, invoking the Defense Production Act to delegate authority to the Secretary of Agriculture to prioritize and allocate materials, services, and facilities to ensure adequate domestic supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides. The order designates these substances as critical to national defense and agricultural productivity, citing their use in military devices, semiconductors, lithium-ion batteries, and crop protection. The Secretary is directed to issue orders and regulations ensuring domestic producers' corporate viability is not jeopardized.
• Trump signed executive order invoking Defense Production Act to ensure domestic supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides — President Trump signed an executive order on February 18, 2026, invoking the Defense Production Act of 1950 to designate elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides as critical to national defense. The order delegates authority to the Secretary of Agriculture to allocate materials and prioritize domestic production, stating that the U.S. imports over 6 million kilograms of elemental phosphorus annually and has only one domestic producer. The order directs the Secretary to ensure domestic producer viability and grants immunity to compliant producers under section 707 of the Act.
• White House issued fact sheet on Defense Production Act order for phosphorus and herbicide supply chains — The White House published a fact sheet on February 18, 2026, describing an executive order signed by President Trump that day invoking the Defense Production Act to mobilize domestic production of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides. The order delegates Defense Production Act authority to the Secretary of Agriculture to allocate materials and ensure supply continuity, framing both substances as critical to military readiness and food security. The fact sheet states the order directs the Secretary of Agriculture to issue implementing regulations in consultation with the Secretary of War.
• Trump administration issued executive order to ramp up domestic glyphosate production — The Trump administration announced an executive order aimed at spurring domestic production of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup weedkiller. The move immediately provoked backlash from supporters of RFK Jr.'s "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) movement, who had been promised health reform. RFK Jr., now Health Secretary, had previously campaigned against glyphosate as a carcinogen and promised to ban its use as a desiccant on wheat. Despite the contradiction, Kennedy issued a statement supporting the president's decision. MAHA activists and advocates expressed outrage, viewing the order as a betrayal of the movement's core health agenda and a gift to the pesticide industry.
• Trump executive order provides legal protections for glyphosate manufacturers — Trump issued an executive order expected to provide legal protections for chemical manufacturers tied to glyphosate-based products as he seeks to increase production of the chemical found in weed killers. The move contradicts RFK Jr.'s stated position one month prior that glyphosate causes cancer. RFK Jr. is now supporting Trump's action despite his earlier public statements on the carcinogenic properties of the chemical.

Supporting reports

• Ghislaine Maxwell refuses to answer questions in congressional deposition — Ghislaine Maxwell, serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking teen girls for Epstein, refused to answer questions during her deposition before the House oversight committee. Her attorney invoked her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, citing her ongoing legal fight against her conviction. Maxwell's counsel stated she would be willing to speak if granted clemency by President Trump, effectively conditioning cooperation on executive pardon.
• House oversight committee subpoenas Bill and Hillary Clinton for Epstein depositions — The House oversight committee subpoenaed former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to provide closed-door depositions regarding their ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton has publicly acknowledged flying on Epstein's airplane in the early 2000s for humanitarian work but denied visiting Epstein's private island. The Clintons are scheduled to sit for depositions the following week.
• Les Wexner testifies before House oversight committee on Epstein ties — Billionaire Les Wexner, former boss of Victoria's Secret, testified before the House oversight committee on Wednesday regarding his past financial relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Wexner, subpoenaed as part of the committee's investigation into Epstein's crimes, denied misconduct and claimed he was "duped" by Epstein. Democrats on the committee questioned his credibility, suggesting he must have known about Epstein's abuse given their close association. The testimony continued throughout the afternoon at Wexner's Ohio home.
• Rep. Garcia reported DOJ and FBI did not contact Les Wexner about Epstein — House Oversight ranking member Robert Garcia reported that during Les Wexner's deposition, Wexner stated that neither the DOJ nor the FBI had ever contacted him to ask about Epstein and his crimes, despite Wexner's decades-long relationship with Epstein, his power of attorney over Epstein's finances, and his position as someone Epstein trusted deeply. Garcia characterized this as "outrageous and unforgivable."
• Rep. Lynch criticized DOJ for inaction on Epstein investigation compared to UK — Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) appeared on CNN and contrasted the British government's swift action in arresting Prince Andrew with the U.S. government's inaction. Lynch stated that "our chief law enforcement officer Pam Bondi is defending and obstructing the investigation," highlighting the stark difference in how the two governments have responded to Epstein-related allegations.
• Leslie Wexner deposition underway in Epstein investigation; House Oversight Committee examines financial transfers — A major deposition involving Leslie Wexner, Epstein's longtime financial patron, is underway as part of the ongoing Epstein investigation. Congressman Robert Garcia, ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, emphasized Wexner's significance prior to the deposition, noting that much of Epstein's wealth came directly from Wexner and that understanding why such vast sums were transferred remains central to understanding the broader enterprise. Survivors have consistently pointed to Wexner as a key figure within Epstein's network. Wexner submitted a written statement claiming he was "naive" and had been duped by a "con man," insisting he severed ties nearly two decades ago and had no knowledge of Epstein's criminal conduct.
• California congressman Ro Khanna identifies Les Wexner as previously redacted name in Epstein files — California congressman Ro Khanna publicly identified Les Wexner as one of six previously redacted names in the Epstein trove, where the FBI appears to have named him as a co-conspirator. Khanna's disclosure prompted national attention to Wexner's ties to Epstein. Wexner is scheduled to be deposed in front of an oversight committee on Wednesday following the disclosure.

Supporting reports

• FCC Chairman Brendan Carr signals enforcement of equal-time rule against talk shows — FCC Chairman Brendan Carr issued new guidance signaling that late-night and daytime talk shows can no longer assume they fall under the "bonafide news" exemption from the equal-time rule. Carr indicated that exemption determinations would depend on multiple factors, including whether there was "partisan motivation" in featuring political candidates as guests. The guidance prompted stations to seek pre-approval before booking candidates, effectively making the FCC a de facto guest-booking authority.
• FCC Chair Carr opened investigation of The View — FCC chair Brendan Carr opened an investigation of the morning talk show The View after Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico appeared on the show earlier this month. Carr changed the FCC's enforcement of the Equal Time Rule to apply to non-news talk shows that appear to be "motivated by partisan purposes," requiring networks to give equal time to all candidates for an office if they interview one candidate.
• FCC chair investigates talk show for Equal Time Rule violation — FCC chair Brendan Carr opened an investigation into the talk show "The View" after it featured Democratic candidate James Talarico, suggesting that the show may have violated the Equal Time Rule by not providing equal airtime to other candidates.
• FCC launches investigation into ABC's interview with Democratic candidate — After ABC's The View interviewed Texas State Representative James Talarico on February 2, 2026, an anonymous FCC source leaked to Fox News that the Commission had launched an investigation into the interview. The FCC source stated, "Fake news is not getting a free pass anymore," signaling that the investigation was retaliatory and politically motivated.
• FCC investigated San Francisco radio station over ICE coverage — Early in Trump's second term, the FCC launched an investigation into San Francisco radio station KCBS over its coverage of ICE operations in San Jose. According to the Associated Press, the station's news directors told employees to ensure that the station's coverage did not anger the FCC, demonstrating that regulatory threat had a chilling effect on editorial independence.

Supporting reports

• Rep. Randy Fine falsely attributes dog-ban statement to AOC and calls for Muslim deportation — Representative Randy Fine (R-FL) took a comment from an unidentified Muslim activist in New York City regarding a ban on dogs as pets and used it to argue that Muslims in the United States should be deported. Fine later repeated the claim on Newsmax, stating that "Democrats like AOC are saying 'we are going to get rid of your dogs'" and urged Americans to remember this when voting in November. AOC made no such statement. Fine attributed the position of one unknown individual to the entire Democratic Party.

Supporting reports

• Trump repeats false Epstein exoneration claim — President Trump stated on Air Force One that he has "nothing to hide," has been "exonerated," and has "nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein," claiming he has been "totally exonerated on Epstein." Representative James Walkinshaw (D-VA) responded that Trump "hasn't been exonerated" and that "Trump's relationship with Epstein was much longer and much deeper than he has revealed," citing information from released Epstein files.
• Trump claimed exoneration regarding Epstein and made false statements about 2020 election — On Air Force One, Trump responded to questions about Prince Andrew's arrest by claiming he is "totally exonerated" regarding Epstein, stating "I did nothing." Trump falsely claimed that Epstein "was against me" and "was fighting me in the election" based on "the last three million pages of documents." In fact, Trump has not been exonerated. Later in Georgia, Trump promoted the false claim that he won the 2020 election and urged Congress to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which he claimed would prevent future losses. Trump stated: "We'll never lose a race. For 50 years, we won't lose a race."
• Trump expressed sympathy for Prince Andrew and claimed exoneration regarding Epstein — Trump responded to Prince Andrew's arrest by expressing sympathy for his "old friend," stating he felt it was "a shame" and "a very sad thing." Trump claimed he was "the expert in this because I've been exonerated" and stated "I did nothing" regarding Epstein, while noting that "nobody used to speak about Epstein when he was alive."
• Trump makes false claims about voter ID support and mail-in ballot prevalence — President Trump claimed that 98 percent of the population supports voter ID requirements and wants to end mail-in ballots, which he characterized as corrupt. Trump stated that the United States is "the only country in the world that has this system of mail in ballots" and asserted that if voter ID and proof of citizenship were required, "Democrats could never win an election." Trump made these claims while promoting the SAVE Act, which extends beyond voter ID requirements to include additional provisions.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders National Park Service to restore slavery exhibit at Philadelphia historic site — On February 17, 2026, U.S. District Judge Cynthia Rufe issued a preliminary injunction ordering the National Park Service to reinstall a slavery exhibit at Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia. The exhibit had been dismantled the previous month in response to Trump administration claims of "anti-American ideology" at cultural institutions. Philadelphia had sued the Department of the Interior, and Judge Rufe granted the city's request to temporarily block the removal and restore the exhibit pending litigation, citing constitutional concerns about executive power to unilaterally alter historical records.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — City of Philadelphia v. Burgum (E.D. Pa.) 2:26-cv-00434 — Judge Rufe granted a preliminary injunction , ordering Defendants to restore the President's House to its physical status as of Jan. 21, 2026 by “reinstall[ing] all panels, displays, and video exhibits that were previously in place” and “prevent[ing] any additions, removals, destruction, or further changes of any kind to the President's House site” without mutual agreement of the City of Philadelphia or until further court order.
• Appeal filed — City of Philadelphia v. Burgum (E.D. Pa.) 2:26-cv-00434 — Defendants appealed the court's Feb. 16, 2026 memorandum opinion and order to the Third Circuit, Case No. 26-1348 .
• Stay pending appeal decided — City of Philadelphia v. Burgum (E.D. Pa.) 2:26-cv-00434 — Judge Hardiman of the Third Circuit stayed the district court's preliminary injunction ordering Defendants to restore the President's House Site to its physical status as of Jan. 21, 2026 and to provide immediate and proper maintenance of the site. Judge Hardiman denied Defendants' request for an administrative stay of the portion of the preliminary injunction enjoining Defendants from taking any action to damage or change the site and ordered Defendants to preserve the status quo as of the entry of his order. Judge Hardiman referred the request for a stay pending resolution of the appeal to a full three-judge motions panel.
• — Judge Rufe denied Defendants' emergency motion for an immediate administrative stay and a stay pending appeal.

Supporting reports

• Stephen Colbert reports CBS blocked Talarico interview — The Trump administration issued new guidance in January 2026 reinterpreting the "equal-time rule" to apply to daytime and late-night talk shows, reversing the longstanding assumption that interviews with politicians conducted by talk show hosts would be exempt from the rule. This guidance became the legal basis cited by CBS for blocking the Colbert-Talarico interview.
• Texas Democratic Senate primary between Talarico and Crockett — James Talarico and Jasmine Crockett are competing in the Texas Democratic primary for a U.S. Senate seat scheduled for March 3, 2026. On February 16, CBS refused to air Stephen Colbert's interview with Talarico, citing Trump administration FCC guidance concerns. The incident generated widespread censorship allegations and boosted Talarico's campaign through viral YouTube views and fundraising. Both candidates present contrasting strategies: Crockett emphasizes partisan confrontation of Trump; Talarico pursues cross-partisan economic messaging to appeal to disaffected Trump voters and independents.
• Stephen Colbert reports network legal censorship of Texas state representative — Late-night host Stephen Colbert announced on air that his network's legal team had prohibited him from interviewing Texas state Representative James Talarico, who was scheduled as a guest. Colbert stated he was told "in no uncertain terms" that he could not have Talarico on the broadcast and was further instructed not to mention the prohibition itself. Colbert then proceeded to discuss the censorship on air, citing the network's apparent unwillingness to address the matter.
• CBS refused to air Colbert interview with Democratic candidate over FCC equal-time rule — Late-night host Stephen Colbert reported that CBS refused to broadcast an interview he conducted with Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico, citing legal concerns about FCC chair Brendan Carr's regulatory guidance issued in January requiring equal airtime for political candidates on daytime and late-night talk shows. CBS claimed the broadcast "could trigger" the equal-time rule, though the network stated the program was not prohibited. Colbert's team found no historical enforcement of the rule on late-night shows dating to the 1960s. The interview was uploaded to YouTube instead.
• CBS Blocks Stephen Colbert Interview with Texas State Representative — CBS network legal counsel blocked Stephen Colbert from airing an interview with Texas State Representative James Talarico and instructed him not to mention the cancellation. The network cited concerns about retaliation from FCC Chair Brendan Carr. Colbert disclosed the censorship on-air and subsequently released the interview independently online, revealing the chilling effect of government pressure on editorial decisions.
• CBS prohibits Colbert interview with Democratic candidate under FCC pressure — CBS forbade Late Show host Stephen Colbert from interviewing Texas State Representative James Talarico, a Democrat running for U.S. Senate, citing the FCC's January 21 "equal time rule" reinterpretation. The FCC declared that talk-show interviews with political candidates would no longer have blanket news exemptions and would be evaluated case-by-case for "bona fide" news purposes versus "partisan purposes." CBS also instructed Colbert's lawyers to prevent him from discussing the censorship decision. Colbert aired the incident anyway on his February 17 show, calling it an effort to silence Trump critics on television.
• Colbert's interview with Talarico received 3.8 million YouTube views — As of 10:00 p.m. on February 18, Colbert's 15-minute interview with Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico had been viewed on YouTube 3.8 million times. Forbes reported it is Colbert's most watched interview in months, indicating significant public interest in Talarico's message criticizing Republican use of Christianity as a political weapon.
• CBS blocked interview with Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico — Late-night talk show host Stephen Colbert told viewers he had been unable to air an interview he did with Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate from Texas James Talarico. Colbert stated: "I was told…that not only could I not have him on, I could not mention me not having him on." CBS chose not to challenge the FCC's reinterpreted Equal Time Rule, which FCC chair Brendan Carr had changed to apply to non-news talk shows deemed "motivated by partisan purposes."

Supporting reports

• Epstein survivors condemn partial file release — A group of 20 Epstein survivors issued a joint statement condemning the Bondi/Blanche letter claiming transparency. The survivors stated that the release exposes them while protecting Epstein's enablers, with survivors' names and identifying information disclosed while the men who abused them remain hidden and protected.

Supporting reports

• Garcia calls for Commerce Secretary Lutnick investigation — House Oversight ranking member Robert Garcia called on House Oversight Committee chair James Comer to bring in Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for questioning. Garcia stated that Lutnick visited Epstein's island and had extensive communications with Epstein after it was known Epstein was preying on children, and argued Lutnick should not hold office.
• House Oversight demands full Epstein file release — House Oversight ranking member Robert Garcia stated that Trump's DOJ intends to withhold approximately 50% of Epstein files while claiming full compliance with law. Garcia announced the committee will demand release of all files to the committee while protecting survivors, and will investigate the names of Epstein's co-conspirators and men who abused women and girls.
• Rep. Mace challenges DOJ privilege claims on Epstein files — Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) stated that DOJ's invocation of "Work Product Privilege" will not withstand legal challenge for withholding Epstein files. Mace argued that federal agencies have already waived privileges by disclosing redacted and unredacted information, and that privilege claims cannot apply when investigations are concluded and no prosecutions are planned.

Supporting reports

• Trump posted deleted video depicting Obama and Michelle as apes — Trump posted a video depicting former President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as apes, which he subsequently deleted. When asked about the video, Obama stated that the majority of the American people find such behavior deeply troubling, though it gets attention and serves as a distraction. Obama noted that some people still believe in decency, courtesy, and kindness, contrasting this with the "clown show" happening on social media and television.

Supporting reports

• DOJ claims full compliance with Epstein Transparency Act — Attorney General Pam Bondi and Todd Blanche issued a letter asserting that the Department of Justice has completely fulfilled its obligations under the Epstein Transparency Act, claiming release of all records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in DOJ's possession relating to Epstein. House Oversight ranking member Robert Garcia disputed this claim, stating that approximately 50% of Epstein files remain withheld.
• Rep. Massie alleges DOJ removed Epstein documents — Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) stated that the DOJ took down significant Epstein documents before Congress could review unredacted versions. Massie said the DOJ cannot keep documents down after already producing them, indicating potential destruction or concealment of evidence.
• Sen. Schumer accuses DOJ of Epstein file cover-up — Sen. Chuck Schumer stated that the Epstein Transparency Act required all files to be released by December 19, 2025. Schumer alleged that DOJ delayed release for 43 days, cherry-picked documents with heavy redactions, and admitted to releasing less than 1% of all documents until recently. Schumer accused Attorney General Bondi of attempting to deceive the American people.
• Trump administration declares Epstein files case closed despite evidence of undisclosed material — Reporting indicates the Epstein files are substantially larger than previously disclosed, with researchers estimating as much as 50 terabytes of material, with only a fraction produced publicly. The Trump administration has declared the case "closed" and insisted there is nothing more to see, despite evidence to the contrary. Millions of documents reportedly remain undisclosed.
• DOJ withholds approximately 3 million Epstein files despite congressional mandate — The Trump administration's Department of Justice continues to withhold approximately 3 million documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, despite Congress mandating their release in late 2025. Hillary Clinton, speaking at the Munich Security Conference, accused the DOJ of "slow-walking" the release and urged the administration to "get the files out." Periodic document dumps have occurred, but the vast majority remain unreleased.

Supporting reports

• FDA refuses to consider Moderna mRNA flu vaccine application — The FDA rejected Moderna's application for an mRNA-based flu vaccine, citing inadequate trial design in which control group participants over 65 received standard-dose rather than high-dose flu shots. FDA officials claimed this was a "brazen failure," though Moderna states the FDA previously approved the trial design in writing and recommended the standard-dose approach. The decision has prompted expert criticism that the FDA is pursuing an anti-vaccine agenda and will deter future vaccine development.

Supporting reports

• Democrats blocked Republican funding proposals to demand enforcement reforms — On Thursday, February 13, Democratic lawmakers blocked Republican attempts to pass either full-year DHS funding or a two-week extension without including immigration enforcement reforms. The blocked proposals would have funded the department without addressing Democratic demands for body cameras, visible identification numbers, warrant requirements for arrests on private property, and tightened use-of-force policies. Congress then recessed until February 23, leaving the impasse unresolved.
• Department of Homeland Security partial shutdown begins after Senate fails to pass appropriations bill — The Department of Homeland Security entered a partial shutdown after the Senate failed to reach the 60-vote threshold needed to pass the DHS appropriations bill on Thursday, February 13. Democrats blocked funding, demanding new restrictions on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) operations following the fatal shooting of two civilians in Minneapolis. The shutdown affects TSA, Secret Service, and FEMA operations, with TSA workers expected to continue without pay and many FEMA workers furloughed. ICE and CBP operations are expected to continue due to existing funding.
• Senate Democrats block DHS funding bill over ICE reform demands — Senate Democrats voted 52-47 on February 13 to block a House-passed Department of Homeland Security funding package, falling short of the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster. The blockade was triggered by the Trump administration's refusal to implement ICE reforms demanded by Democrats, including mandatory body cameras, agent identification, and restrictions on operations near schools, courts, and polling places. The shutdown will affect TSA, FEMA, and Coast Guard but leave ICE largely unaffected due to prior $75 billion appropriation. Democrats cited recent shooting deaths of two Minneapolis residents by federal agents as catalyst for their stance.
• Senate rejects DHS appropriations bill in party-line vote — The Senate voted 52-47 along party lines to reject the DHS appropriations bill on Thursday, February 13, with only Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania supporting it. Democrats blocked the measure and rejected a Republican proposal for a two-week temporary funding extension, demanding new restrictions on ICE and CBP operations in response to the fatal shooting of civilians in Minneapolis. Republicans resisted key Democratic proposals, including requirements for judicial warrants before agents enter private property, though they agreed to body cameras for agents.
• Senate Democrats block DHS funding over ICE and Border Patrol reform demands — Senate Democrats, in the minority, used the filibuster to block a DHS funding measure passed by the House, demanding reforms to ICE and Border Patrol operations. Their demands include requiring judicial warrants for home entries, visible agent identification, an end to racial profiling and raids of sensitive sites, use-of-force policies, coordination with state and local authorities, detention facility standards, body camera restrictions, and standardized uniforms. The partial shutdown will defund most DHS agencies except ICE and Border Patrol, which received dedicated funding in the July 2025 budget reconciliation bill.
• DHS funding lapsed at midnight with no legislative action — DHS funding expired at midnight with no eleventh-hour legislative action. Both the House and Senate left town without voting on a DHS funding bill, with senators departing for pre-planned travel including the Munich Security Conference and not scheduled to return for 10 days. This left 260,000 DHS employees without funding. Senate Democrats remained united in their demands regarding ICE, with only Sen. John Fetterman joining Republicans on a failed procedural vote.

Supporting reports

• Kristi Noem calls for SAVE America Act passage — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told reporters in Arizona that Congress must pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act to secure U.S. elections. She claimed noncitizens are voting for Democrats and enabling them to win elections, but when asked for an example of noncitizen voting, she said she could not point to a case but assumed it happened. The bill would require voters to show either a passport or birth certificate with matching names to register and would require states to purge voting rolls every month.
• Kristi Noem held press conference on election integrity with unsubstantiated claims — DHS Secretary Kristi Noem held a press conference in Arizona regarding "election integrity" and DHS's potential role in elections if the SAVE Act passes. When asked for examples of voter fraud in Arizona, she responded "I'm sure there's many of them" without providing any. She also addressed a question about CBP shooting down a party balloon it mistook for a drone with a laser, citing a "joint agency task force" but providing no substantive explanation for the lack of FAA coordination.

Supporting reports

• Governor Walz calls for accountability and federal payment for Minnesota operation damages — Governor Tim Walz addressed Minnesota following the announced withdrawal, calling for accountability and demanding that the federal government pay for damage and destruction caused by the operation. Walz emphasized that trust has been eroded and highlighted the human cost, including generational trauma to children who witnessed classmates being taken away. He credited peaceful protest and civic engagement with forcing the retreat.
• Trump administration withdraws ICE and Border Patrol from Minnesota operation — Tom Homan announced that ICE and Border Patrol personnel deployed under "Operation Metro Surge" will be withdrawn from Minnesota. Homan stated the search operation will conclude, with a significant drawdown already underway and continuing through the following week. The withdrawal follows weeks of documented abuses and local resistance, including pushback from Governor Tim Walz and community documentation of harm.
• Tom Homan announces drawdown of ICE surge in Minnesota — Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, announced on February 13 that the federal ICE surge in Minnesota would be ending, with agents being drawn down over the course of that week and the following week. The announcement came after weeks of intensive enforcement operations that had disrupted schools, businesses, and community life across the state.
• Border czar announces wind-down of Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota — Tom Homan, the U.S. border czar, announced on Thursday, February 13, that the administration was winding down "Operation Metro Surge" and that the number of ICE agents in Minnesota would return to normal levels. Homan recently assumed leadership of the operation from Greg Bovino, a senior Border Patrol official who was in charge when federal agents fatally shot two civilians in Minneapolis. The announcement came before the Senate's failed vote on DHS appropriations.
• Trump administration announces drawdown of immigration surge operation in Minnesota — Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, announced at a press briefing that President Trump has approved ending the months-long immigration crackdown surge in Minnesota. Homan stated agents would be returned to normal duties or reassigned, with Minnesota's agent count returning to approximately 100 from over 2,000. The operation had resulted in the deaths of two US citizens, mass detentions, and widespread protests. Security teams will remain to monitor "agitators" opposing immigration enforcement. Homan cited coordination with local law enforcement as enabling the drawdown.
• Trump administration ends ICE surge in Minneapolis — Tom Homan, Trump's immigration advisor, announced that the administration will end its surge of federal agents in Minneapolis, claiming the operation achieved "successful results" including 4,000 arrests. Agents will remain in the city but the surge of thousands will conclude. This announcement came after Border Patrol agents under then-commander Greg Bovino shot and killed a second American citizen in the city, and after more than a dozen federal prosecutors resigned when the Department of Justice declined to investigate the killings.
• Trump Administration's Decision to End Deportation Surge in Minneapolis — The Trump Administration has announced it will end the deportation surge in Minneapolis, a decision attributed to public pressure and advocacy efforts. This move comes after widespread community response and protest against what was perceived as a hostile federal occupation. The decision marks a significant victory for local activists and community organizers who have been working to protect immigrant communities from aggressive enforcement actions.

Supporting reports

• EPA revoked endangerment finding for greenhouse gas emissions — The Environmental Protection Agency revoked the endangerment finding that has been the basis for regulating emissions from cars and power plants since 2009. The finding reflected scientific consensus that greenhouse gases produced by burning fossil fuels endanger the health and general welfare of the American people. The Trump administration claims the revocation will save Americans $1.3 trillion, primarily through cheaper cars and trucks, but did not factor in costs of extreme weather or pollution-related health issues.
• Trump administration announces repeal of 2009 endangerment finding on greenhouse gases — The Trump administration, led by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, announced it will formally rescind the 2009 Obama-era endangerment finding that determined CO2 and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. This finding has served as the legal foundation for federal climate regulations under the Clean Air Act. The White House press secretary characterized the action as "the largest deregulatory action in American history." Environmental groups have pledged legal challenges, arguing the move will expose Americans to climate risks and health harms while benefiting fossil fuel interests.
• Trump EPA rescinds 2009 endangerment finding, eliminating legal basis for federal climate regulations — The Trump administration, through EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, finalized the rescission of the 2009 endangerment finding—the legal foundation for all federal climate regulations under the Clean Air Act. The administration characterized this as the "largest deregulatory action in American history" and claimed it would save $1.3 trillion, though provided no methodology. Environmental groups including the Natural Resources Defense Council, Earthjustice, and Sierra Club pledged immediate litigation. The move follows Trump's campaign-trail request for $1 billion from oil executives in exchange for scrapping environmental rules.
• Trump EPA revokes endangerment finding, eliminating climate pollution regulation authority — The Trump administration's EPA, led by Administrator Lee Zeldin, revoked the 2009 endangerment finding that authorized the agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles, power plants, and industrial sources under the Clean Air Act. Trump called it "the single largest deregulatory action in American history." The move eliminates the EPA's legal basis to impose emissions tracking, reporting, and limits on transportation sources, though stationary sources remain technically covered under a separate Clean Air Act section. Environmental groups and California have pledged legal challenges; experts project 18 billion additional tons of planet-warming pollution by 2055 and up to $4.7 trillion in climate and air-pollution costs.
• EPA moves to revoke greenhouse gas emissions authority — The Environmental Protection Agency moved to revoke its longstanding authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the endangerment finding. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin claimed the endangerment finding, which stated that greenhouse gases pose a threat to human health, was built on a "con job" and asserted that climate change does not endanger public health.
• White House issues fact sheet announcing EPA revocation of 2009 Endangerment Finding — The White House issued a fact sheet announcing that President Trump has revoked the EPA's 2009 "Endangerment Finding" that classified greenhouse gases as harmful to human health under the Clean Air Act. The document claims this action eliminates the regulatory foundation for vehicle emissions standards, fuel economy mandates, and power plant regulations. The fact sheet asserts the revocation will save American families an average of $2,400 on vehicle purchases and reduce overall regulatory costs by $1.3 trillion. The announcement includes statements from industry groups, conservative organizations, and Republican officials supporting the action.