Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Federal Election Commission Cancels Open Meeting — The Federal Election Commission (FEC) announced the cancellation of its open meeting scheduled for June 26, 2025. The meeting was to be held in a hybrid format at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. The cancellation was made public through a notice in the Federal Register, as required by the Government in the Sunshine Act. No further details on the reason for the cancellation were provided.

Supporting reports

• House Oversight Committee Democrats Demand Epstein Files — The House Oversight Committee Democrats formally demanded that FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi release all files and evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. This demand follows posts by Elon Musk suggesting former President Trump was implicated in the FBI's Epstein files. The committee noted that Bondi had promised to release these documents three months ago and questioned why no additional documents have been released since February 27, 2025.

Supporting reports

• House Republicans Block Investigation into Hegseth's Use of Signal — House Republicans blocked an effort by Democrats to investigate Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of Signal by adding a provision into a rule that prevents votes on "resolutions of inquiry." This move limits congressional oversight of executive actions.

Supporting reports

• Elon Musk's FAA project involves nondisclosure agreements — Staffers for Elon Musk's "Department of Government Efficiency" are working on a multimillion-dollar communications project called "Project Lift" at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). FAA employees involved in the project have been required to sign nondisclosure agreements, limiting transparency about the project's details and objectives.
• Trump Administration Grants Classified Network Access to Musk's Team — NPR reported that two members of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency were issued accounts on classified networks containing top-secret details about the country's nuclear weapons. This access raises significant security and oversight concerns.

Supporting reports

• DOGE claims $130 billion in savings but faces verification challenges — DOGE announced on its website that it has saved $130 billion since Trump's inauguration, averaging approximately $2 billion per day. However, Market Watch reported that this figure is significantly lower than the $4 billion per day that Elon Musk pledged to cut in a Fox News interview. Reporters and analysts have difficulty confirming DOGE's claims, and erroneous claims and examples of claimed savings have been documented as disappearing from the list of purported cost-saving cutbacks.
• DOGE removes federal identification numbers from website source code — Bloomberg reported that DOGE removed federal identification numbers from its website's source code, making it particularly difficult for fact-checkers and analysts to identify specifically which grants and contracts the agency is referring to when claiming savings. This action makes it difficult or impossible to verify which vendors the government has targeted for cuts.

Supporting reports

• Protect Democracy Project sued OMB over removal of federal funding database — The non-profit organization Protect Democracy Project sued the Office of Management and Budget and its director Russell Vought for removing a database on the office's website that shows how federal funding is disbursed to agencies. The lawsuit challenges the removal of transparency information.
• OMB removes federal spending transparency tracker; watchdog group sues for restoration — Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, deactivated a public tracker that disclosed how the federal government spends congressionally appropriated funds. Vought justified the removal by claiming the tool required disclosure of "sensitive, predecisional and deliberative information." The non-profit watchdog group Protect Democracy filed suit in US District Court in Washington DC on Monday, alleging the removal violated federal law requiring OMB to publicly post apportionment documents. The Government Accountability Office also challenged Vought's rationale, noting that apportionments are legally binding decisions and cannot be predecisional. The suit seeks a court declaration that the removal was unlawful and restoration of the tracker.
• Protect Democracy Project files lawsuit against DOGE and OMB over federal funding transparency — The Protect Democracy Project filed a lawsuit against the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and OMB Director Ross Vought, alleging that the Trump administration is violating the law by taking down a government website that displayed how federal funding is disbursed to agencies. The complaint states that the website "went dark, without explanation" and argues that Congress mandated transparency for apportionments to prevent abuses of power and strengthen oversight.

Supporting reports

• Trump announces $1 trillion military budget for fiscal year 2026 — On April 7, President Trump announced plans to propose a $1 trillion military budget for fiscal year 2026, representing a $107 billion increase from current spending. Trump stated during a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the increase was necessary to strengthen U.S. military capacity. This reverses Trump's February position that military spending of nearly $1 trillion was excessive and should be reduced through arms-control negotiations with China and Russia. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth endorsed the proposal.
• White House warned Trump would veto tariff approval bill — The White House warned that Trump would veto a bill that would require approval from Congress to impose new tariffs.
• CNBC reported false rumor of Trump tariff pause, causing market volatility — CNBC reported a false rumor that Trump would announce a 90-day pause on tariffs after Fox host Brian Kilmeade asked White House Economic Advisor Kevin Hassett if Trump would consider such a pause. The rumor caused stock markets to rally sharply mid-morning. When the White House denied the report as "fake news," markets declined again. The false report originated from Hassett's non-committal response that "the president is gonna decide what the president is gonna decide."
• White House denied tariff pause report as fake news — The White House social media account responded to the CNBC report of a tariff pause by stating "Wrong. Fake News. Not only did Director Hassett not say this, POTUS has been clear - 'it all has to change, but especially with CHINA!!!'" The denial clarified that Trump has not agreed to any tariff pause.
• Peter Navarro stated tariffs are not a negotiation but a national emergency response — White House trade advisor Peter Navarro told Fox News that the tariffs represent "a national emergency based on a trade deficit that's gotten out of control because of cheating," explicitly rejecting the characterization of tariffs as a negotiating tactic. This statement contradicted other administration messaging suggesting tariffs were leverage for trade negotiations.
• Trump posted on Truth Social that his policies will never change — President Trump posted on Truth Social stating "MY POLICIES WILL NEVER CHANGE," signaling that tariff policy would not be reversed despite market turmoil and economic concerns. This statement contradicted earlier messaging that tariffs were negotiating tactics.
• White House issued fact sheet stating tariffs remain in effect until trade deficit threat is resolved — The White House released a fact sheet claiming that tariffs would remain in effect "until such a time as President Trump determines that the threat posed by the trade deficit and underlying nonreciprocal treatment is satisfied, resolved, or mitigated." This statement indicated tariffs were not temporary negotiating tools but permanent policy subject only to Trump's subjective determination.
• Trump announces 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs — Hours after reciprocal tariffs took effect on April 9, 2025, Trump announced a 90-day pause on them, with the exception of China, where he increased tariffs to 125%. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt characterized the move as part of Trump's negotiating strategy, referencing "The Art of the Deal." The pause came after stock markets had fallen sharply and amid widespread economic warnings.
• Trump announces 90-day tariff pause with modified rates, triggering market volatility and insider-trading allegations — On Wednesday, April 9, Trump announced a 90-day pause on his tariff plan, replacing his original broad tariffs with a 10% blanket rate on most countries through July, while raising China tariffs to 145% effective immediately. The announcement triggered a historic market rally Wednesday afternoon, followed by sharp sell-offs Thursday as economists warned the effective tariff rate was worse than worst-case scenarios. Democrats alleged possible insider trading and market manipulation; Republicans praised the move as strategic negotiation.
• Trump reversed course on tariffs with 90-day pause — After tanking the stock market, Trump reversed course on his "Liberation Day" tariffs. He announced a 90-day pause on a steep hike in tariffs on most countries, except for China, which he said would now face duties of 125%.
• Senators and representatives questioned insider trading related to tariff announcements. — Multiple members of Congress raised concerns about potential insider trading in the hours before Trump's tariff announcement. Senator Adam Schiff stated he would investigate whether Trump and associates tipped off friends to profit from market movements. Senator Bernie Sanders expressed skepticism that people with advance knowledge of the tariff reversal did not profit. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called for disclosure of stock purchases made in the prior 48 hours and urged a ban on congressional insider trading. Senator Chris Murphy characterized the situation as "an insider trading scandal brewing."
• Trump's approval rating fell to 41% in new Quinnipiac poll. — A new Quinnipiac poll showed President Trump's approval rating at 41% with 53% disapproval. CNN analyst Harry Enten noted that only two presidents have had net negative approval ratings at this point in their term: Donald Trump in his first term and Donald Trump in his second term.
• White House refused to release list of 75 countries allegedly requesting tariff deals. — President Trump claimed that leaders of 75 countries had called "kissing my ass" to request trade deals, prompting him to lift most tariffs. When NBC News requested the list of these 75 countries, the White House refused to release it. The refusal raised questions about the veracity of Trump's claim and the basis for the tariff reversal.
• 30-year mortgage rates surge to 7.1% — The average mortgage rate on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages surged 1.3 basis points to 7.1% on this date. Matthew Graham, COO of Mortgage News Daily, characterized the week as the worst for bond markets in terms of 10-year yield jumps for anyone whose career began after 1981, indicating severe market volatility tied to administration policy.

Supporting reports

• American Oversight filed lawsuit against Defense Secretary Hegseth and other officials for Federal Records Act violations — American Oversight, a nonprofit organization focusing on government transparency, filed a lawsuit against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the National Archives. The lawsuit alleges violations of the Federal Records Act for using the Signal messaging app to discuss military operations without preserving the communications as required by law. The suit also suggests the administration has made other attempts to circumvent federal records preservation requirements.
• American Oversight files lawsuit to compel preservation of Signal chat messages — The watchdog group American Oversight filed a federal lawsuit on Tuesday against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and others, alleging violations of federal records retention laws. The 18-page suit seeks to compel the Trump administration to preserve Signal chat messages that use auto-deletion functions. The case was assigned to Chief US District Judge James Boasberg in Washington DC, who is also presiding over a separate national security case involving the administration's deportation of Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act.
• Government watchdog sued Hegseth over Signal records violation — A government watchdog group sued Hegseth and other Trump administration officials, arguing that using Signal to discuss military plans violated federal records laws. The lawsuit seeks to enforce compliance with the Federal Records Act.
• Federal judge orders preservation of Signal chat messages from Yemen military operation — Chief US District Judge James Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order requiring Trump administration officials—including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard—to preserve all Signal messages exchanged between 11–15 March. The order followed disclosure that National Security Adviser Mike Waltz had inadvertently added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a chat discussing a military strike on Houthi targets in Yemen, including operational details and intelligence sourced from Israeli assets. The lawsuit, brought by transparency group American Oversight, alleges violation of the Federal Records Act, which requires preservation of government communications.
• Case update — American Oversight v. Hegseth (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00883 — After a hearing, Chief Judge James Boasberg issued an order , “as agreed by the parties,” for “Defendants shall promptly make best efforts to preserve all Signal communications from March 11-15, 2025.” The court also ordered defendants to file a status report by March 31 “setting forth the steps that they have taken to implement such preservation.”
• American Oversight filed a lawsuit against Trump administration officials — American Oversight, a nonprofit organization focused on government transparency, filed a lawsuit against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and others for violating the Federal Records Act. The lawsuit claims that these officials failed to preserve federal records related to military planning discussions conducted on the unsecure messaging app Signal. This legal action aims to hold the administration accountable for its handling of sensitive information.

Supporting reports

• USAID staff ordered to destroy records — Staffers at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) received an email instructing them to shred or burn agency records, despite laws requiring the preservation of federal documents. This action raises concerns about potential evidence destruction related to government operations.
• Case update — American Federation of Government Employees v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00352 — Defendants responded to the March 11 TRO motion and included an affidavit by Carr. Defendants stated that the instruction to destroy documents “had nothing to do with this litigation,” was done to clear space formerly occupied by USAID, and were copies “where the originally classified document is retained by another government agency and for which there is no need for USAID to retain a copy.”
• USAID staff ordered to destroy agency records — On March 12, 2025, staff at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) received an email instructing them to shred or burn agency records, despite laws requiring the preservation of federal documents.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders Doge to release internal records — A federal judge, Christopher Cooper, has ruled that Elon Musk's "department of government efficiency" (Doge) must comply with transparency laws and release its internal documents. The ruling was made in response to a lawsuit by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew), challenging the Trump administration's attempts to shield Doge from the Freedom of Information Act. The judge's decision highlights Doge's substantial authority and its impact on federal agencies, including the termination of employees and access to sensitive databases.

Supporting reports

• Kennedy's health department to eliminate public participation in policy decisions — The US Department of Health and Human Services, led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., announced plans to eliminate public participation in many of the agency's policy decisions. This move contradicts Kennedy's earlier promise of "radical transparency" made to Congress. The department has historically allowed public comment on a range of actions, and this change would significantly alter the rulemaking process at an agency that oversees substantial healthcare spending and programs.

Supporting reports

• Musk's Doge deletes savings claims from website — Elon Musk's "department of government efficiency" (Doge) removed five major savings claims from its "wall of receipts" after they were debunked. The deletions, which included erroneous savings figures for agencies like ICE and USAid, were made without explanation. The New York Times reported these changes, highlighting discrepancies such as a misreported $8 billion saving for ICE, which should have been $8 million. The initiative, part of Musk's cost-cutting drive, has faced criticism for errors and lack of transparency.

Supporting reports

• Attorney General Bondi indicates Epstein files under review on her desk — On February 21, 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News that Epstein case files were "sitting on my desk right now to review" in response to a question about whether the DOJ would release a list of Epstein's clients. Bondi later suggested she was referring to case files rather than a client list, but the statement signaled potential control over the release of materials potentially implicating the president.
• Attorney General Bondi states Epstein client list is on her desk — In February 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News Channel that the Epstein client list was "sitting on my desk right now," suggesting the administration would release it. This statement was made to MAGA audiences who had been promised transparency on Epstein files as a key campaign commitment, with senators like Marsha Blackburn supporting Kash Patel's FBI directorship partly on the expectation he would release Epstein information.

Supporting reports

• DOJ removes database of Jan. 6 insurrectionists' charges — The Department of Justice removed a database listing the criminal charges and convictions of individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection. This action raises concerns about transparency and accountability in the handling of cases related to the insurrection.