Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Federal Election Commission Cancels Open Meeting — The Federal Election Commission (FEC) announced the cancellation of its open meeting scheduled for June 26, 2025. The meeting was to be held in a hybrid format at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. The cancellation was made public through a notice in the Federal Register, as required by the Government in the Sunshine Act. No further details on the reason for the cancellation were provided.

Supporting reports

• Congressional Representatives Denied Access to Detainees — Representatives Jimmy Gomez, Luz Rivas, Norma Torres, and Lou Correa were denied access to check on detainees arrested during federal raids in Los Angeles. The representatives were turned away by a federal agent despite federal law allowing members of Congress to conduct oversight visits. The detainees reportedly lacked access to food, water, and medicine, raising concerns about their treatment and rights.
• Democratic lawmakers denied entry to detention centers in LA and New York — Over the weekend, Democratic members of Congress from California and New York were denied entry to federal detention facilities in Los Angeles and New York City. The lawmakers, including Maxine Waters, Jimmy Gomez, and Norma Torres, sought to inspect conditions and check on individuals detained during recent immigration raids and protests. The Department of Homeland Security stated that the lawmakers were turned away for safety reasons, citing large numbers of rioters. The lawmakers argued that their congressional roles entitled them to conduct oversight of the detention conditions and the welfare of detainees.
• Members of Congress Barred from ICE Detention Facilities — Five members of Congress reported being barred from entering ICE detention facilities to conduct oversight, despite having legal authority to do so. This included attempts by representatives from New York and California to check on the well-being of detainees.

Supporting reports

• House Oversight Committee Democrats Demand Epstein Files — The House Oversight Committee Democrats formally demanded that FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi release all files and evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. This demand follows posts by Elon Musk suggesting former President Trump was implicated in the FBI's Epstein files. The committee noted that Bondi had promised to release these documents three months ago and questioned why no additional documents have been released since February 27, 2025.

Supporting reports

• Federal Election Commission Cancels Open Meeting — The Federal Election Commission (FEC) announced the cancellation of its open meeting scheduled for June 5, 2025. The meeting was to be held in a hybrid format at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. The cancellation was made public through a notice in the Federal Register, under the authority of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. No further details on the reason for the cancellation were provided.

Supporting reports

• Federal Election Commission Cancels Open Meeting — The Federal Election Commission (FEC) announced the cancellation of its open meeting scheduled for May 22, 2025. The meeting was to be held in a hybrid format at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. The cancellation was communicated through a notice in the Federal Register, and individuals requiring special assistance for the meeting were advised to contact the FEC for accommodations. The cancellation was made under the authority of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
• Federal Election Commission Sunshine Act Meeting Notice — The Federal Election Commission (FEC) published a notice regarding a Sunshine Act meeting initially scheduled for May 20, 2025, at 10 a.m. The meeting was rescheduled to begin at 11 a.m. and included discussions on compliance matters under 52 U.S.C. 30109. This notice ensures transparency in the FEC's operations and compliance with the Government in the Sunshine Act, which mandates open meetings for federal agencies.
• Federal Election Commission Cancels Scheduled Meeting — The Federal Election Commission (FEC) announced the cancellation of its meeting originally scheduled for May 22, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. This decision was published in the Federal Register under the Government in the Sunshine Act, which mandates transparency in government meetings. The cancellation notice was filed by Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Commission, and further information can be obtained from Myles Martin, Deputy Press Officer.

Supporting reports

• House Republicans Block Investigation into Hegseth's Use of Signal — House Republicans blocked an effort by Democrats to investigate Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of Signal by adding a provision into a rule that prevents votes on "resolutions of inquiry." This move limits congressional oversight of executive actions.

Supporting reports

• Center for Biological Diversity sues Trump administration over "unleash American energy" executive order and green policy rollbacks — The environmental nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging its day-one executive order directing federal agencies to identify and weaken or eliminate policies and regulations that "unduly" burden fuel producers. The lawsuit seeks information about action plans from the Department of Interior, Department of Commerce, EPA, and Forest Service. The suit follows a February FOIA request that officials have not answered, and comes as the administration has announced plans to eliminate greenhouse gas reporting requirements and other environmental protections.
• Green groups sue federal officials over removal of climate and environmental justice data from government websites — Environmental groups filed a lawsuit against federal officials over the removal of government webpages containing federal climate and environmental justice data. This action is part of a broader pattern of the Trump administration deleting or restricting access to environmental information and records.
• USDA erases climate data from department records — The U.S. Department of Agriculture erased climate data from its records, prompting a lawsuit from environmental advocates. This action is part of the administration's systematic removal of climate-related information from federal agencies.

Supporting reports

• DOGE accessed National Labor Relations Board secure data with behaviors consistent with criminal hacking — On April 15, NPR reported an official whistleblower disclosure that members of the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) accessed the National Labor Relations Board's secure data upon arrival. While claiming to seek cost-cutting opportunities, their behavior—demanding highest-level access, hiding activities, disabling monitoring tools, and manually deleting records—resembled criminal or state-sponsored hacking. An IP address in Russia attempted login using a newly created DOGE account with correct credentials. A large data spike suggested sensitive information was leaving the agency. The whistleblower who raised concerns received threats.

Supporting reports

• Protect Democracy Project sued OMB over removal of federal funding database — The non-profit organization Protect Democracy Project sued the Office of Management and Budget and its director Russell Vought for removing a database on the office's website that shows how federal funding is disbursed to agencies. The lawsuit challenges the removal of transparency information.
• OMB removes federal spending transparency tracker; watchdog group sues for restoration — Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, deactivated a public tracker that disclosed how the federal government spends congressionally appropriated funds. Vought justified the removal by claiming the tool required disclosure of "sensitive, predecisional and deliberative information." The non-profit watchdog group Protect Democracy filed suit in US District Court in Washington DC on Monday, alleging the removal violated federal law requiring OMB to publicly post apportionment documents. The Government Accountability Office also challenged Vought's rationale, noting that apportionments are legally binding decisions and cannot be predecisional. The suit seeks a court declaration that the removal was unlawful and restoration of the tracker.
• Protect Democracy Project files lawsuit against DOGE and OMB over federal funding transparency — The Protect Democracy Project filed a lawsuit against the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and OMB Director Ross Vought, alleging that the Trump administration is violating the law by taking down a government website that displayed how federal funding is disbursed to agencies. The complaint states that the website "went dark, without explanation" and argues that Congress mandated transparency for apportionments to prevent abuses of power and strengthen oversight.

Supporting reports

• American Oversight filed lawsuit against Defense Secretary Hegseth and other officials for Federal Records Act violations — American Oversight, a nonprofit organization focusing on government transparency, filed a lawsuit against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the National Archives. The lawsuit alleges violations of the Federal Records Act for using the Signal messaging app to discuss military operations without preserving the communications as required by law. The suit also suggests the administration has made other attempts to circumvent federal records preservation requirements.
• American Oversight files lawsuit to compel preservation of Signal chat messages — The watchdog group American Oversight filed a federal lawsuit on Tuesday against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and others, alleging violations of federal records retention laws. The 18-page suit seeks to compel the Trump administration to preserve Signal chat messages that use auto-deletion functions. The case was assigned to Chief US District Judge James Boasberg in Washington DC, who is also presiding over a separate national security case involving the administration's deportation of Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act.
• Government watchdog sued Hegseth over Signal records violation — A government watchdog group sued Hegseth and other Trump administration officials, arguing that using Signal to discuss military plans violated federal records laws. The lawsuit seeks to enforce compliance with the Federal Records Act.
• Federal judge orders preservation of Signal chat messages from Yemen military operation — Chief US District Judge James Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order requiring Trump administration officials—including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard—to preserve all Signal messages exchanged between 11–15 March. The order followed disclosure that National Security Adviser Mike Waltz had inadvertently added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a chat discussing a military strike on Houthi targets in Yemen, including operational details and intelligence sourced from Israeli assets. The lawsuit, brought by transparency group American Oversight, alleges violation of the Federal Records Act, which requires preservation of government communications.
• Case update — American Oversight v. Hegseth (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00883 — After a hearing, Chief Judge James Boasberg issued an order , “as agreed by the parties,” for “Defendants shall promptly make best efforts to preserve all Signal communications from March 11-15, 2025.” The court also ordered defendants to file a status report by March 31 “setting forth the steps that they have taken to implement such preservation.”
• American Oversight filed a lawsuit against Trump administration officials — American Oversight, a nonprofit organization focused on government transparency, filed a lawsuit against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and others for violating the Federal Records Act. The lawsuit claims that these officials failed to preserve federal records related to military planning discussions conducted on the unsecure messaging app Signal. This legal action aims to hold the administration accountable for its handling of sensitive information.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge declined to block IRS tax record sharing — A federal judge declined to block the IRS from sharing tax records of noncitizens with DHS, allowing the agency to share sensitive financial information with immigration enforcement.

Supporting reports

• Federal Election Commission cancels open meeting — The Federal Election Commission announced the cancellation of its open meeting originally scheduled for March 13, 2025. The meeting was to be held in a hybrid format at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. The cancellation was communicated by Vicktoria J. Allen, Deputy Secretary of the Commission, under the authority of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
• Federal Election Commission Sunshine Act Meeting Notice — The Federal Election Commission announced a Sunshine Act meeting scheduled for March 13, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. The hybrid meeting will be held at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. The agenda includes a draft advisory opinion for U.S. Representative Mikie Sherrill and management matters. The meeting is open to the public, with virtual access available via the FEC website.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders Doge to release internal records — A federal judge, Christopher Cooper, has ruled that Elon Musk's "department of government efficiency" (Doge) must comply with transparency laws and release its internal documents. The ruling was made in response to a lawsuit by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew), challenging the Trump administration's attempts to shield Doge from the Freedom of Information Act. The judge's decision highlights Doge's substantial authority and its impact on federal agencies, including the termination of employees and access to sensitive databases.

Supporting reports

• DHS dismantles independent watchdog offices, citing obstruction of immigration enforcement — The Trump administration's DHS dismantled three independent watchdog offices—the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties office (CRCL), the Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman (OIDO), and the CIS Ombudsman office—in March 2025. The agency stated the offices "obstructed immigration enforcement" and were being closed. All 147 full-time CRCL employees and 118 OIDO staff were ousted. This action became the subject of a federal lawsuit filed in April 2025 by civil rights organizations challenging it as violating separation of powers.
• Trump administration dismantles DHS civil rights watchdog offices, reducing oversight capacity by 97% — The Trump administration gutted three independent DHS watchdog offices tasked with investigating civil rights violations, detention conditions, and deaths in custody. Court records show the civil rights office received nearly 6,000 complaints from March to December 2025 but investigated only 183 (3%), compared to a historical 20% rate. Staff at the CRCL dropped from 147 to fewer than 40; the OIDO fell from 118 to 5 people. A lawsuit by civil rights groups challenges the action as violating separation of powers and constitutional norms.
• CRCL office staffing reduction and suppression of civil rights report — The Department of Homeland Security's Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL), which had approximately 150 employees, was reduced to only two full-time employees and around 20 outside contractors. A congressionally-mandated report documenting suspected civil rights violations by local police agencies in the 287(g) program—completed and cleared through multiple DHS components—was placed "into limbo" after Trump took office and has not been published. Former officials report the report identified jurisdictions, particularly in Florida, suspected of violating civil rights in 2023.
• Department of Homeland Security eliminates federal immigration detention oversight offices — In March 2025, the Department of Homeland Security effectively eliminated its Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, and Office of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman. These offices were responsible for investigating complaints about immigration detention facilities and reporting conditions to Congress. The elimination removes federal watchdog capacity to monitor detention conditions as ICE custody reaches record levels and is projected to become the deadliest year for people in ICE custody.

Supporting reports

• Kennedy's health department to eliminate public participation in policy decisions — The US Department of Health and Human Services, led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., announced plans to eliminate public participation in many of the agency's policy decisions. This move contradicts Kennedy's earlier promise of "radical transparency" made to Congress. The department has historically allowed public comment on a range of actions, and this change would significantly alter the rulemaking process at an agency that oversees substantial healthcare spending and programs.

Supporting reports

• Department of Homeland Security eliminates federal immigration detention oversight offices — In March 2025, the Department of Homeland Security effectively eliminated its Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, and Office of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman. These offices were responsible for investigating complaints about immigration detention facilities and reporting conditions to Congress. The elimination removes federal watchdog capacity to monitor detention conditions as ICE custody reaches record levels and is projected to become the deadliest year for people in ICE custody.

Supporting reports

• Attorney General Bondi indicates Epstein files under review on her desk — On February 21, 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News that Epstein case files were "sitting on my desk right now to review" in response to a question about whether the DOJ would release a list of Epstein's clients. Bondi later suggested she was referring to case files rather than a client list, but the statement signaled potential control over the release of materials potentially implicating the president.
• Attorney General Bondi states Epstein client list is on her desk — In February 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi told Fox News Channel that the Epstein client list was "sitting on my desk right now," suggesting the administration would release it. This statement was made to MAGA audiences who had been promised transparency on Epstein files as a key campaign commitment, with senators like Marsha Blackburn supporting Kash Patel's FBI directorship partly on the expectation he would release Epstein information.

Supporting reports

• Federal Election Commission cancels open meeting — The Federal Election Commission announced the cancellation of its open meeting scheduled for February 27, 2025. The meeting was to be held in a hybrid format at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. The cancellation was made under the authority of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. No further details on the reason for the cancellation were provided.

Supporting reports

• Inspectors general fired by Trump file lawsuit — Eight former inspectors general from various U.S. government departments, including defense and veterans affairs, have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration. They seek redress for what they claim were unlawful and unjustified dismissals. The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday, argues that their terminations were illegal and that they should remain in their positions unless lawfully removed. The plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive relief to prevent interference with their duties. The lawsuit follows Trump's removal of 18 inspectors general shortly after returning to office.

Supporting reports

• Trump fires Archivist of the United States — President Trump fired Colleen Shogan, the Archivist of the United States, who led the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). This action follows NARA's efforts to retrieve classified documents from Mar-a-Lago.

Supporting reports

• Oklahoma State Board of Education approves social studies standards incorporating election denial claims — The Oklahoma State Board of Education approved revised social studies standards in February 2025 that direct high school teachers to present discredited 2020 election conspiracy theories—including claims about ballot-counting halts, mail-in voting risks, and "bellwether county" anomalies—as legitimate topics for student debate. The standards, championed by State Superintendent Ryan Walters and developed with input from far-right figures including Kevin Roberts (Heritage Foundation) and Dennis Prager (PragerU), will take effect in fall 2025. Teachers report concern about pressure to teach election falsehoods despite overwhelming judicial and DOJ refutation.
• Oklahoma Superintendent Walters approves social studies curriculum including 2020 election fraud claims — Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters approved a new social studies curriculum for the 2025-26 school year that requires high school students to "analyze" debunked claims about the 2020 election, including allegations of ballot-counting halts, mail-in voting fraud, and "batch dumps." The curriculum presents these claims as legitimate concerns without labeling them as conspiracy theories. The State Board of Education approved the standards in February after Walters provided them to board members only 4 p.m. the day before a 9:30 a.m. meeting, preventing adequate review of the 400-page document. Multiple board members later stated they did not realize the standards differed from earlier versions and called Walters' tactics a "breach of trust."
• Walters withheld curriculum changes from State Board members until day before vote — Ryan Walters did not send the new social studies standards with his additions to State Board of Education members until 4 p.m. the day before the board's 9:30 a.m. meeting, preventing adequate review of the approximately 400-page document. The email "subtly indicate[d]" updates had been made but provided no specifics. During the meeting, Walters did not mention specific changes. When board member Chris VanDenhende later requested documents noting the changes, Walters called the request "irrelevant." Board member Ryan Deatherage asked to delay the vote, but Walters pressured the board to vote that day, citing a legislative time crunch that did not exist—the board had until April to approve the standards.

Supporting reports

• Federal Election Commission Sunshine Act Meeting Notice — The Federal Election Commission announced a closed Sunshine Act meeting scheduled for January 28, 2025, with a continuation on January 30, 2025. The meeting will address compliance matters, internal personnel decisions, investigatory records, and participation in civil actions. The meeting will be held at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually.
• — The Federal Election Commission (FEC) announced a change in its previously scheduled Sunshine Act meeting. The meeting, initially set for January 30, 2025, included discussions on a Sample Donor Response Form for Contributions by LLCs and the Two-Year Renewal of Directive 74. The meeting was held in a hybrid format at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. This notice ensures transparency in the FEC's operations and decision-making processes.
• — The Federal Election Commission announced a Sunshine Act meeting scheduled for January 30, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in a hybrid format, both in-person at 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC, and virtually. The agenda includes proposed revisions to Directives 10 and 17, as well as management and administrative matters. The meeting is open to the public, and virtual access instructions are available on the FEC's website.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration halts federal grants and loans — On January 27, the Trump administration ordered a pause on all federal government grants and loans, requiring that they ban diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. This directive affects a wide range of federal programs and funding.
• Trump freezes federal grants, loans, and payments — President Trump ordered an immediate freeze on federal grants, loans, and payments to millions of Americans, citing a need to review their appropriateness and potential ties to DEI initiatives. This action, which affects funds previously allocated by Congress, has been criticized as illegal under the 1974 Impound Control Act. The freeze has caused widespread confusion and concern, with reports of Medicaid portals being down nationwide and various federal programs in disarray.
• Trump administration freezes federal funding for DEI and environmental programs — The Trump administration announced a freeze on federal grants targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and environmental initiatives, described as "illegal DEI programs" and "green new scam" initiatives. This funding pause, set to activate on the evening of January 28, 2025, could impact trillions of dollars in grants and loans, affecting programs such as school meals for low-income students and wildfire preparedness. The Office of Management and Budget has requested details from federal agencies about over 2,600 programs that could be affected.
• White House rescinds spending freeze on federal loans and grants — The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rescinded a policy that temporarily paused federal loans and grants, reversing a decision made earlier in the week. This policy had initially halted funding for various programs, including Medicaid. The rescission followed a federal judge's restraining order against the funding freeze, which was issued due to conflicting messages from the White House. Despite the rescission, the White House press secretary stated that the executive orders on federal funding remain in effect.
• Trump administration memo orders freeze on federal financial assistance — The Trump administration issued a memo directing federal agencies to freeze the disbursement of all federal financial assistance, effective January 30, 2025. The memo, authored by acting OMB Director Matthew J. Vaeth, requires agencies to submit detailed information about their financial assistance programs by February 10, 2025. The freeze will remain until the Office of Management and Budget reviews and approves each program. The memo excludes direct assistance to individuals, such as Social Security and Medicare. The stated purpose is to prevent federal resources from advancing certain policies deemed wasteful by the administration.
• Trump administration rescinds federal funding freeze memo — The Trump administration rescinded a memo that froze federal funding after it caused widespread chaos and legal challenges. The initial freeze had paused federal grants and loans, affecting public programs and government spending.
• Case update — National Council of Nonprofits v. Office of Management and Budget (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00239 — The Government submitted a Notice that the OMB had rescinded the challenged memo. On the same day, the White House Press Secretary stated , “This is not a rescission of the federal funding freeze. It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo. Why? To end any confusion created by the court's injunction. The President's EO's on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.”
• Case update — State of New York v. Trump (D.R.I.) 1:25-cv-00039 — The Government submitted a notice that the OMB had rescinded the challenged memo. On the same day, the White House Press Secretary stated , “This is not a rescission of the federal funding freeze. It is simply a rescission of the OMB memo. Why? To end any confusion created by the court's injunction. The President's EO's on federal funding remain in full force and effect, and will be rigorously implemented.”
• Trump administration sued over funding freeze — The Trump administration faced a lawsuit from multiple states over a funding freeze memo. Despite rescinding the memo, the administration argued in court for the lawsuit's dismissal. However, a judge ordered the release of funds, citing conflicting statements from the administration's press secretary, which suggested the freeze was still in effect.
• Reports of Medicaid portal outages following funding freeze — Following the Trump administration's memo to freeze federal financial assistance, reports emerged of Medicaid portal outages across all 50 states. Senator Ron Wyden confirmed the outages, describing them as a "blatant attempt to rip away health insurance from millions of Americans." The White House attributed the outages to technical issues, but the Medicaid website cited delays due to executive orders on grant payments. Medicaid provides health insurance to nearly a fifth of all Americans.
• Trump administration freezes federal funding — The Trump administration announced a freeze on all federal funding and grants, claiming it would ensure the removal of "Marxist" diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. This decision affects various programs, including Meals on Wheels and Medicaid, which are essential for many Americans. The Office of Management and Budget later issued a memo to rescind the freeze, but the press secretary contradicted this, indicating the cuts were still in effect. The situation has led to significant public outcry and legal scrutiny.
• Trump issues executive order freezing government grants — Former President Trump issued an executive order freezing government grants, which was described as illegal and a direct assault on congressional authority. The order was rescinded after two days due to public outrage and pressure from lawmakers. The freeze caused significant disruption and uncertainty for millions of Americans dependent on government benefits and payments. The swift public and political response highlighted the power of civic engagement in countering executive overreach.
• Trump’s administration freezes federal grants — The Office of Management and Budget under Trump sent out a memo freezing all federal grants and loans without prior approval from the White House, leading to concerns about a constitutional crisis.
• Court issues injunction against Trump Administration — U.S. District Court Judge Jack McConnell issued an injunction against the Trump Administration, preventing it from impounding federal funds intended for states. The court found that the Executive's pause in disbursement of federal funding would cause irreparable harm to states' ability to provide vital services. The injunction ensures that federal financial assistance to states remains uninterrupted.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — State of New York v. Trump (D.R.I.) 1:25-cv-00039 — Judge McConnell issued a temporary restraining order against the OMB policy to allow the states to file their motion for a preliminary injunction. Judge McConnell's order notes that the case is not moot because “the alleged rescission of the OMB Directive was in name only and may have been issued simply to defeat the jurisdiction of the courts.” The judge also wrote, "the States are likely to succeed on the merits of some, if not all, their claims."

Supporting reports

• DOJ removes database of Jan. 6 insurrectionists' charges — The Department of Justice removed a database listing the criminal charges and convictions of individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection. This action raises concerns about transparency and accountability in the handling of cases related to the insurrection.

Supporting reports

• Lawsuit filed against Trump's 'Doge' program — A lawsuit was filed against the 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) program, initiated by Donald Trump and led by Elon Musk, shortly after Trump's swearing-in. The lawsuit, filed by the public interest law firm National Security Counselors, claims that Doge violates federal transparency rules. It argues that Doge should be considered a federal advisory committee, which requires balanced representation, record-keeping, and public access to meetings. The program, which aims to cut government programs and jobs, has reportedly hired staff working from Musk's SpaceX offices.
• DOGE program sued for transparency violations — The DOGE program, initiated by the Trump administration, was sued shortly after Trump's inauguration. The lawsuit alleges that DOGE violates federal transparency rules, including failing to maintain balanced representation, keep records of meetings, and ensure public scrutiny. The National Security Counselors, a public interest law firm, argue that DOGE should be classified as a federal advisory committee, which would subject it to specific legal requirements for transparency and accountability.