Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Gun Owners of America filed lawsuit challenging National Firearms Act — Within hours of Trump signing the budget reconciliation bill into law, Gun Owners of America and other pro-gun organizations filed a lawsuit claiming the measure makes the 1934 National Firearms Act (NFA) unconstitutional. The NFA regulated machine guns and short-barrel guns through taxation and registration requirements. The budget reconciliation bill ended those taxes, and plaintiffs argue this eliminates the constitutional justification for the law. Gun Owners of America stated in a press release that its team had been "working behind the scenes with Congress since the November 2024 election to fully repeal the NFA" and that the new law had positioned their lawsuit against the registry.
• Budget bill eliminates $200 tax on suppressors and short-barreled firearms — Trump signed a budget reconciliation bill on July 4, 2025, that eliminated the $200 federal tax on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns, while preserving NFA registration requirements and machine gun restrictions. The provision was drafted by Gun Owners of America and inserted by sympathetic Republican lawmakers including Andrew Clyde, Roger Marshall, Mike Crapo, and Steve Daines.
• Gun Owners of America files lawsuit to overturn National Firearms Act restrictions — Following passage of a budget bill that eliminated the $200 tax on suppressors and short-barreled rifles (while preserving registration requirements), Gun Owners of America filed a lawsuit on July 4, 2025, seeking to overturn NFA restrictions on suppressors and short-barreled long guns entirely. Within a month, 15 Republican-led states joined as plaintiffs. The Firearms Policy Coalition and NRA filed a similar lawsuit on August 1. The litigation represents an escalation of efforts to dismantle one of America's oldest gun laws, passed in 1934.

Supporting reports

• House advances Trump tax-and-spending bill through procedural votes — The House of Representatives advanced Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" through procedural votes on July 2–3, 2025, after Democratic minority leader Hakeem Jeffries delivered an 8-hour-44-minute floor speech opposing passage. The bill, which passed the Senate on July 1 with Vice President JD Vance casting a tie-breaking vote, includes $3.3 trillion in deficit spending through 2034, extends 2017 tax cuts, allocates $45 billion for ICE detention and $14 billion for deportation operations, imposes new Medicaid work requirements, and sunsets green-energy incentives. Speaker Mike Johnson secured final Republican holdouts to advance the measure toward a final House vote.
• House passes Trump tax-and-spending bill with permanent tax cuts, deportation funding, and safety-net cuts — The U.S. House of Representatives passed Trump's comprehensive tax-and-spending legislation on Thursday, following Senate passage on Tuesday with VP Vance's tie-breaking vote. The bill extends 2017 tax cuts permanently (benefiting high earners disproportionately), allocates $45bn for ICE detention and $14bn for deportation operations, funds $50bn+ for border fortifications, cuts Medicaid (affecting ~10.6m people) and SNAP (affecting ~8m people), phases out clean-energy tax credits, raises the debt ceiling by $5tn, and increases the deficit by $3.3tn through 2034. The bill now awaits Trump's signature.
• Trump budget bill passage with immigration enforcement expansion and social benefit cuts — The House passed Donald Trump's budget reconciliation bill on Thursday, July 3, 2025, with no Democratic support and only two Republican defections (Thomas Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick). The bill expands immigration enforcement funding to $170 billion (making ICE larger than the FBI, DEA, and Bureau of Prisons combined), cuts Medicaid expansion, reduces SNAP benefits, allows the tipped-worker tax break to sunset in three years while making billionaire tax cuts permanent, and removes subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. Democrats issued widespread condemnation, citing projected deaths and loss of healthcare access.
• Hakeem Jeffries delivers record-breaking House floor speech opposing Trump tax bill — Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries spoke for more than eight hours on the House floor beginning shortly before 5am on Thursday, July 3, 2025, breaking the previous record of 8 hours 32 minutes set by Kevin McCarthy in 2021. Using the "magic minute" tradition that allows House leaders unlimited speaking time after floor debate concludes, Jeffries opposed Trump's $4.5 trillion tax-and-spending bill, reading stories of Americans who would lose healthcare, food assistance, and other benefits. He characterized the legislation as a "crime scene" and "abomination" that will harm millions while benefiting billionaires.
• House passes Trump tax-and-spending bill with 218-214 vote — The US House of Representatives passed Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending bill on Thursday with a narrow 218-214 vote after weeks of negotiations. The legislation extends 2017 tax cuts permanently, creates new exemptions for tips and overtime pay, allocates $170 billion to immigration enforcement and border wall construction, and cuts Medicaid and SNAP benefits. The Congressional Budget Office projects it will add $3.3 trillion to the national debt through 2034 and cost millions of people their healthcare and food assistance benefits.
• Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries delivered record-length floor speech opposing budget bill — Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-VA) delivered the longest floor speech in House history, lasting all night and into Thursday afternoon, opposing the budget bill. He criticized the bill's impact on the poor and sick, concluding with a statement about hypocrisy: "You got some people in this town who go to church and pray on Sunday, and then they come to Congress and prey on the American people."
• House Republicans adopted Senate budget bill without amendments after Trump summoned Freedom Caucus members to Oval Office — House Republicans voted to adopt the Senate's budget bill following a marathon debate session. Despite weeks of public complaints from Freedom Caucus members that the Senate version was "horrible" and promises to make significant changes, the House passed it unchanged. Trump summoned the dissenting Republicans to the Oval Office, where they received signed merchandise and photos; they emerged agreeing to support the bill. Only two Republicans voted against it: Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA). The bill adds nearly $4 trillion to the debt and cuts Medicaid, Medicare, and nutrition assistance.
• Congressional passage of budget legislation with expansions to law enforcement and detention infrastructure — The House of Representatives passed a budget bill described as containing provisions for expanded law enforcement capacity, detention facilities, and enforcement quotas. The legislation was characterized by commentators as regressive and dangerous. The bill reportedly allocates resources toward building what critics describe as a sophisticated law enforcement apparatus with detention infrastructure and enforcement mechanisms tied to quota systems. The passage occurred despite stated opposition from advocacy groups and public awareness campaigns.
• House passes "One Big Beautiful Bill"; Trump administration announces legislative victory — The White House issued a press release announcing that the House of Representatives passed legislation titled the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which the administration characterizes as delivering "the largest middle-class tax cut in history," border security measures, military funding, and other provisions. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated the bill represents "the biggest legislative win of President Trump's two terms" and that Trump "looks forward to signing" it into law. The release does not provide the bill's actual text, specific provisions, or legislative details.
• House and Senate pass Trump's tax-and-spending bill with narrow Republican majorities — Republicans passed a sweeping budget bill extending 2017 tax cuts, increasing the debt limit by $4 trillion, and adding work requirements to Medicaid and Snap. The House passed it 219–213 on Thursday after Speaker Johnson held the vote open for seven hours—the longest recorded—while Trump pressured holdouts via phone calls and social media. The Senate passed it 50–50 with Vice President Vance breaking the tie. The bill faced opposition from fiscal conservatives and moderates over deficit concerns and Medicaid cuts, resolved through targeted state benefits and executive order promises.

Supporting reports

• Federal court rules Trump's asylum ban proclamation unlawful — US District Judge Randolph Moss ruled that President Trump's proclamation declaring an "invasion" at the US-Mexico border and suspending asylum processing exceeded presidential authority and violated the Immigration and Nationality Act and Constitution. Trump had signed the proclamation on inauguration day, directing officials to "repel, repatriate, or remove" migrants. Moss found the president lacks authority to unilaterally replace Congress's immigration statutes with an alternative system. The Trump administration has 14 days to seek emergency relief from the federal appeals court; if upheld, the ruling would require the Department of Homeland Security to resume processing asylum claims at the southern border.

Supporting reports

• DOJ sues 15 federal district court judges in Maryland over deportation order — The Trump Justice Department took the unusual step of suing 15 federal district court judges in Maryland over an order blocking the immediate deportation of migrants challenging their removal. This represents an extraordinary assertion of executive power against the judicial branch and an attempt to override judicial decisions protecting due process rights for migrants facing deportation.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration sued Los Angeles over sanctuary city policy — The Trump administration sued the city of Los Angeles over a sanctuary city policy prohibiting city resources from being used for immigration enforcement, arguing it is hindering efforts to crack down on what the administration calls a "crisis of illegal immigration." The lawsuit challenges local authority to restrict participation in federal immigration enforcement.
• Trump administration files lawsuit against Los Angeles over sanctuary city immigration policies — The Trump administration, through the Department of Justice, filed a federal lawsuit in the Central District of California against the city of Los Angeles, challenging its sanctuary city ordinance that restricts local police cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. The suit claims the city law discriminates against federal law enforcement and obstructs immigration law enforcement. Attorney General Pam Bondi stated the lawsuit targets what the administration characterizes as illegal sanctuary policies that prioritize undocumented immigrants over American citizens. The filing follows weeks of aggressive immigration enforcement operations and protests in Los Angeles.
• Department of Justice files lawsuit challenging Los Angeles sanctuary city policies — The Department of Justice announced a lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass, and the Los Angeles City Council, alleging that sanctuary city policies enacted after President Trump's reelection interfere with federal immigration law enforcement. The complaint alleges that Los Angeles's refusal to cooperate with federal immigration authorities contributed to recent civil unrest requiring deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines. Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated the lawsuit holds the city accountable for obstructing federal immigration enforcement. The lawsuit is part of a series targeting sanctuary policies in multiple jurisdictions.
• Congress allocates $170.7 billion for immigration and border enforcement over four years — Legislation, referred to as Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," allocates $170.7 billion to immigration and border enforcement programs over the next four years. This represents a significant increase compared to ICE's current annual budget of approximately $8 billion, substantially expanding resources for mass deportation and immigration enforcement operations.

Supporting reports

• Congressional Republicans struggle to pass Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" budget legislation — Trump's signature "One Big Beautiful Bill" budget plan faces tortured progress in Congress as House and Senate Republicans haggle over its contents ahead of a 4 July deadline. The legislation threatens to slash the social safety net, including cuts to Medicaid healthcare for more than 16 million people, and would raise costs for families on rent, groceries, and prescription drugs while funding tax cuts for wealthy Americans. Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren and policy experts characterized it as "Robin Hood-in-reverse" legislation that harms working-class voters.
• Senate Republicans advance Trump tax-and-spending bill through procedural vote — The Republican-controlled US Senate voted 51–49 on Saturday to open debate on Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, clearing a key procedural hurdle. The measure extends 2017 tax cuts, adds new tax breaks including no taxes on tips, and commits $350 billion to national security and border enforcement. Democrats forced the 940-page bill to be read aloud and secured the right to propose unlimited amendments. The bill still requires final passage and House approval before reaching Trump's desk by the Fourth of July deadline.
• Democrats demanded full reading of budget reconciliation bill on Senate floor — After Senate Republicans released the revised 940-page budget reconciliation bill late Friday night and attempted to call a vote the same evening, Democrats demanded that the entire bill be read on the Senate floor. The demand reflected Democratic objections to the compressed timeline and lack of transparency in the legislative process.
• Senate voted to advance budget reconciliation bill — Fifty-one senators voted to advance the budget reconciliation bill, with forty-nine opposing. Republicans Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky voted with Democrats to oppose the measure. Tillis had previously stated he could not support the bill's Medicaid cuts. Following the vote, Trump announced he would support a primary challenger to Tillis, stating he would be "looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina."
• Ron Johnson and Lisa Murkowski flipped votes to pass reconciliation bill — Senators Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) reversed their positions at the last minute to advance the budget reconciliation bill. Johnson sought deeper spending cuts; Murkowski negotiated special exemptions for Alaska from work requirements on SNAP and secured additional Medicaid and tax provisions benefiting the state. The Senate parliamentarian subsequently overruled several of Murkowski's negotiated provisions as violating the Byrd rule.
• Senate advanced budget reconciliation bill to floor debate with 51-49 vote — The Senate voted 51-49 to advance the budget reconciliation bill to the floor for debate, which began that evening. Republicans Thom Tillis (NC) and Rand Paul (KY) voted against it alongside Democrats. Trump subsequently attacked Tillis on Truth Social and announced he would back a primary challenger against him. Tillis responded by announcing he would not seek reelection, citing the need for independent thinking and freedom from campaign fundraising.
• Senate Republicans advance 940-page reconciliation bill with procedural vote — On June 28, 2025, the Senate voted 51–49 to end debate on Trump's reconciliation megabill, with Republican Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Rand Paul (R-KY) joining all Democrats in opposition. Senate Republican leaders held the vote open for hours to pressure holdouts. The 940-page bill includes $930 billion in Medicaid cuts, $186 billion in SNAP reductions, $172 billion for immigration enforcement, $158 billion in new defense spending, and extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts. The bill is scheduled for a final Senate vote on Monday, June 30, with Republicans operating under thin margins in the House.
• Republicans released a new version of the omnibus budget reconciliation bill — Republicans released a revised version of the omnibus budget reconciliation bill just before midnight, which has faced significant Democratic challenges. The new measure removes some controversial provisions but retains its original structure, including the extension of tax cuts for wealthy Americans. The Senate voted 51-49 to advance the bill, with two Republicans joining Democrats in opposition. The bill includes substantial cuts to Medicaid and additional funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
• Senate Minority Leader initiates full bill reading to slow passage — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) forced a full reading of the 940-page budget reconciliation bill in the Senate to slow its passage. The procedural tactic delayed the measure and set the stage for a "vote-a-rama" in which Democratic senators will force Republicans to vote on controversial amendments.
• Senate votes to advance the budget reconciliation bill — The Senate voted 51-49 to advance the revised budget reconciliation bill, with two Republican senators, Thom Tillis and Rand Paul, voting with Democrats against the bill. This vote indicates significant division within the Republican Party regarding the proposed cuts to Medicaid.
• Senate opens debate on Trump's $3.3 trillion deficit bill with forced full reading — The US Senate began formal debate on Donald Trump's comprehensive domestic policy bill on Sunday, June 30, after Democrats forced clerks to read the entire 940-page legislation aloud. The bill combines tax cuts, immigration enforcement spending, and healthcare/nutrition assistance reductions. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the Senate version would increase the deficit by $3.3 trillion over ten years—nearly $1 trillion more than the House version—and cause 11.8 million Americans to lose health insurance. Republicans advanced the bill 51-49 in a procedural vote Saturday after hours of negotiations with holdouts.
• Senate to Vote on Budget Bill Amendments — The Senate is set to begin voting on amendments to the Republicans' budget reconciliation bill in a process known as a "vote-a-rama," where Democratic senators will challenge Republicans on controversial issues.

Supporting reports

• Democrats challenged Republican accounting gimmick on tax cuts — Senate Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, challenged Republicans' use of a "current policy baseline" accounting method that treats $3.8 trillion of Trump tax cut extensions as costing zero dollars. Democrats argue the method violates Senate reconciliation rules. Republicans cannot meet their $1.5 trillion deficit reduction target if they count the full ten-year cost of extending Trump's tax cuts, making the alternate baseline essential to the bill's viability.
• Senate adopts "current policy baseline" accounting method for tax cuts — The Senate voted 53-47 to adopt a "current policy baseline" that treats $3.8 trillion in Trump tax cut extensions as costing zero dollars for budget reconciliation purposes. All Republicans voted yes. This marks the first time this accounting method has been used in a filibuster-proof reconciliation process to meet budget targets, establishing a precedent that could allow future majorities to pass massive permanent programs by scheduling expiration dates and declaring extensions cost-free.
• White House disputes Congressional Budget Office deficit projections — The Trump White House issued statements on its official website claiming the One Big Beautiful Bill would reduce deficits by over $2 trillion through economic growth and waste reduction, while dismissing the Congressional Budget Office as having "a terrible record" with predictions and lacking credibility. The White House asserted the bill would "unleash our economy" and prevent "the largest tax hike in history."

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court limits judicial power to block presidential policies nationwide — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision curbing the power of federal judges to impose nationwide rulings that impede presidential policies, while leaving unresolved the question of whether the president can limit birthright citizenship. The decision, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, rejected arguments that courts must protect citizens from government overreach. Trump held a White House press conference celebrating the ruling as a "monumental victory for the constitution, the separation of powers and the rule of law" and indicated plans to pursue policies on birthright citizenship, sanctuary city funding, and refugee resettlement.
• US Supreme Court rules on nationwide injunctions in birthright citizenship case, declines to address constitutionality of Trump's executive order — On Friday, June 28, 2025, the US Supreme Court issued a ruling in a case challenging Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. The Court did not rule on whether the president has constitutional authority to end the 14th Amendment right. Instead, it addressed whether individual district court judges can block federal policies nationwide. The Court held that lower courts cannot issue nationwide injunctions except in narrow circumstances, requiring challengers to pursue class-action litigation instead. The ruling creates a 30-day pause on the executive order's enforcement.
• Supreme Court limits federal judges' power in Trump v. CASA — The Supreme Court decided the case of Trump v. CASA, which limits the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions. President Donald Trump claimed this decision would allow him to end birthright citizenship, asserting that the principle of citizenship for those born in the U.S. is based on a historical myth. This ruling could have significant implications for immigration policy and citizenship rights.
• Trump executive order limiting birthright citizenship challenged in Supreme Court — One day after Trump's inauguration, five pregnant immigrant women, led by an asylum seeker from Venezuela, sued over the president's executive order limiting automatic birthright citizenship, fearing their unborn children would be left stateless. The case reached the Supreme Court, which on Friday sided with the Trump administration by restricting the ability of federal judges to block the order in a 6-3 vote. The ruling does not address the constitutionality of the order itself but opens the door for partial enforcement.