Trump Action Archive

A searchable record of documented actions, compiled weekly from public sources.

8 events matching

Export CSVResearcher JSONAnalyst Newest first · Oldest first
Filtering Category: Institutions and Governance × Attack target: Separation of Powers × Trait: Chaos is used as a strategy to fragment focus and disable accountability × Clear all ☆ Save this search
Tier 1 carried by a primary record Corroborated 2+ independent news desks Every result is verified and democracy-related.

Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions

Apr 9, 2026 Jamie Raskin requested a formal cognitive assessment of the president from the White House physician Corroborated Institutions and Governance

A senior lawmaker invoked 25th Amendment procedures amid concerns about presidential fitness following erratic public statements.

Independently corroborated by4 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • House Democratic leadership announced a virtual briefing on the 25th Amendment and Trump administration accountability — By Wednesday, House Democratic leadership signaled greater openness to invoking the 25th Amendment, with Minority Leader Jeffries announcing a virtual briefing led by Rep. Jamie Raskin and House Judiciary Democrats on Trump administration accountability and the 25th Amendment. This represented a shift from the prior year, when Congressional Democrats had largely considered such options off the table.
  • Representative Raskin requested cognitive assessment of President Trump — Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the top-ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, sent a letter on April 10 to the president's personal physician, Captain Sean P. Barbabella, requesting a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of Trump. Raskin noted that "Experts have repeatedly warned that the President has been exhibiting signs consistent with dementia and cognitive decline" and cited Trump's "increasingly incoherent, volatile, profane, deranged, and threatening" public statements and "bizarre display" at the White House Easter egg roll. Raskin requested the physician conduct a formal cognitive screening, provide a detailed report on Trump's mental and physical health including medications and their cognitive side effects, and make himself available for an under-oath briefing with Committee members on the assessment results.
  • House Judiciary Committee ranking member requested cognitive examination of Trump — Rep. Jamie Raskin, ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, made a formal request to the White House physician to conduct a cognitive examination of Trump. Raskin cited Truth Social posts and Trump's statements at an Easter Egg Roll event, stating that experts have warned the President exhibits signs consistent with dementia and cognitive decline, and that his recent public statements have become increasingly incoherent, volatile, profane, and threatening.
Verified: Corroborated — 2+ independent news desks Week 64 – 2026-04-04–2026-04-10 wk64_IG_065
Apr 8, 2026 DOJ informed Congress that former Attorney General Pam Bondi's subpoena was void following her removal from office Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

The administration sought to shield a former official from testifying on Epstein files handling, challenging congressional investigative authority.

Primary sourceA record that carries the claim alone
Independently corroborated by3 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Department of Justice claims Pam Bondi subpoena void after her removal as Attorney General — The Department of Justice, through Assistant Attorney General Patrick Davis, informed House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer that former Attorney General Pam Bondi will not appear for a scheduled 14 April deposition regarding the DOJ's handling of the Epstein investigation and release of Epstein files. The DOJ argued the subpoena, issued in her official capacity, no longer obligates her to testify since she was ousted from office on 7 April. The committee has not withdrawn the subpoena; bipartisan members and Democratic leadership assert Bondi remains legally obligated to appear.
  • DOJ blocks Pam Bondi deposition on Epstein files — The Department of Justice announced that former Attorney General Pam Bondi will not appear for her deposition before the House Oversight Committee on April 14th. The DOJ claimed she was subpoenaed in her capacity as AG and no longer holds that role. House Oversight Ranking Member Robert Garcia clarified that the subpoena is to Bondi as an individual, not to her title, and stated that contempt charges are on the table if she does not comply. This continues an ongoing cover-up of Epstein files by the administration.
  • Pam Bondi cancels deposition on Epstein files handling — The Republican-led House Oversight and Reform Committee announced that former Attorney General Pam Bondi will no longer appear for a scheduled deposition to provide testimony about the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files. Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia warned that if Bondi defies her subpoena, the committee "will begin contempt charges in the Congress."
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 64 – 2026-04-04–2026-04-10 wk64_IG_040
Jan 4, 2026 Rubio claimed the Venezuela operation was law enforcement, not military action, to avoid congressional notification Corroborated Institutions and Governance

The Secretary of State's characterization directly contradicted Trump's public statements about occupying Venezuela, appearing designed to evade war powers oversight requirements.

Independently corroborated by4 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Secretary of State Rubio claimed military action in Venezuela was law enforcement, not military invasion — Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated on NBC that the operation in Venezuela was not a military action but rather a law enforcement function to capture an indicted drug trafficker, claiming the Department of War's support was needed only for logistical purposes. Rubio did not acknowledge that congressional notification was required and characterized the operation as distinct from military invasion despite Trump's public statements about running the country and maintaining military presence.
Verified: Corroborated — 2+ independent news desks Week 51 – 2026-01-03–2026-01-09 wk51_IG_009
Nov 22, 2025 Federal judge (EDVA) dismissed criminal cases against James Comey and Letitia James after ruling prosecutor Lindsey Halligan's appointment unlawful Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

A court invalidated politically charged prosecutions of the president's critics after finding the administration circumvented Senate confirmation to install the prosecutor, reinforcing constitutional appointment limits.

Primary sourceA record that carries the claim alone
Independently corroborated by6 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Federal judge rules on Halligan appointment legality in Comey case — A federal judge overseeing the consolidated unlawful-appointment claim in the Comey and James cases indicated he would rule before Thanksgiving on whether prosecutor Lindsey Halligan was lawfully appointed to her position as temporary U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Comey and James argue that Trump and Attorney General Bondi circumvented vacancy laws to install Halligan, rendering her effectively a private citizen with no authority to prosecute on behalf of the United States. If the judge dismisses with prejudice, the DOJ would be barred from bringing the same charges in the future.
  • Federal judge dismisses DOJ cases against Comey and James for unlawful appointment of prosecutor — On Monday (November 24), a federal judge dismissed without prejudice the DOJ's cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after finding that Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi circumvented vacancy laws in appointing U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan. The judge ruled that Halligan was serving unlawfully when she sought indictments, making her the fourth Trump-appointed acting U.S. attorney determined to be illegitimate. Because the statute of limitations on charges against Comey had expired, the DOJ is unlikely to resurrect its case against him.
  • Federal judge dismisses criminal cases against Comey and James, ruling interim prosecutor unlawfully appointed — Judge Cameron McGowan Currie of the Eastern District of Virginia threw out criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James on November 24, 2025, ruling that interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan—appointed by Trump in September—lacked lawful authority to prosecute them. Halligan's appointment violated federal law governing interim prosecutor tenure. The judge found the Trump administration's attempt to circumvent Senate confirmation rules unlawful and dismissed both indictments without prejudice, though Comey's statute of limitations has expired.
  • Federal judge found Trump's appointment of Lindsey Halligan illegal — A federal judge found that Trump's appointment of Lindsey Halligan to the post of U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia was illegal and threw out the cases she had brought against former FBI director James Comey and New York attorney general Letitia James. The ruling invalidated prosecutions brought by an illegally appointed prosecutor.
  • U.S. District Judge Currie dismisses indictments of Comey and James, ruling interim U.S. attorney appointment unlawful — A federal judge found that President Trump's appointment of Lindsey Halligan to the post of U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia was illegal and threw out the cases she had brought against former FBI director James Comey and New York attorney general Letitia James.
  • Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed indictments against James Comey and Letitia James — U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie of South Carolina dismissed indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, finding that President Trump's appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia violated both federal law and the Appointment Clause of the Constitution. Halligan, a former insurance lawyer and Trump aide, had obtained grand jury indictments against both officials after Trump removed interim U.S. attorney Erik Seibert for declining to prosecute them. Judge Currie ruled that Halligan's appointment circumvented Senate confirmation requirements and invalidated all prosecutorial actions undertaken by her.
  • Federal judge dismisses criminal cases against Comey and James — Judge Cameron McGowan Currie of the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed indictments against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James on the grounds that Lindsay Halligan was unlawfully appointed as Interim US Attorney. The court found that the 120-day appointment clock expired on May 21, 2025, making Halligan's service invalid since September 22, 2025. The dismissal was issued "without prejudice," allowing potential re-indictment by a lawfully appointed official. However, the statute of limitations has expired in Comey's case, effectively barring future prosecution.
  • Trump attorney blames DOJ official for Comey indictment dismissal — A federal judge dismissed criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after ruling that prosecutor Lindsey Halligan was illegally appointed as interim US Attorney of Eastern Virginia. Attorney General Pam Bondi subsequently announced the Justice Department would appeal and pursue "all available legal action" to hold James and Comey "accountable."
  • 11th Circuit Court upheld $1 million sanction against Trump and Alina Habba — Trump personal attorney David Schoen told Fox's Laura Ingraham that the dismissal of James Comey's indictment was the fault of DOJ official Pam Bondi, claiming the dismissal was "avoidable" and that DOJ should have had someone in the room with Lindsey Halligan. Schoen praised Bondi for showing "great courage" in obtaining the indictment despite being "left without support." Trump's former NSA Michael Flynn posted that Bondi should be fired and replaced by Sidney Powell, who previously claimed Hugo Chavez rigged the 2020 elections using Italian satellites.
  • Federal appeals court affirms penalty against Trump and Habba — The conservative 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a $1 million sanction against Trump and his lawyer Alina Habba for their frivolous conspiracy-laden racketeering lawsuit targeting Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and former FBI Director James Comey. The court agreed that Trump has a "pattern" of filing meritless lawsuits and spoke bluntly about the abuse, with the appeals court imposing penalties of this size being rare.
  • — A federal appeals court affirmed a nearly $1 million penalty against Trump and lawyer Alina Habba, finding their lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey was "sanctionable conduct." The court found many of their legal arguments "were indeed frivolous" and rejected Trump's effort to revive a 2022 lawsuit targeting his political enemies.
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 45 – 2025-11-22–2025-11-28 wk45_IG_001
Oct 15, 2025 Judge Susan Illston issued a temporary restraining order blocking Trump administration mass firings of federal workers during the shutdown Corroborated Institutions and Governance

A federal court found the administration exploited the shutdown to conduct arbitrary and unlawful reductions in force, protecting civil service employees.

Independently corroborated by5 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Judge Susan Illston grants temporary restraining order blocking Trump's mass layoffs during government shutdown — On Wednesday (October 15, 2025), Judge Susan Illston of the US District Court's Northern District of California granted a temporary restraining order blocking Trump's latest mass layoffs from the government shutdown. The order represents a significant legal victory for unions battling the administration's workforce reduction efforts.
  • Federal court rules Trump's federal worker layoffs during shutdown illegal — A federal court in San Francisco ruled that Trump's layoffs of federal workers during the government shutdown were illegal. The ruling represented a judicial check on executive action during the shutdown.
  • Federal judge temporarily blocked firing of federal employees during shutdown — A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from firing federal employees during the government shutdown, saying the move appeared to be politically motivated and adding, "It's a human cost that cannot be tolerated."
  • Federal judge issues temporary injunction blocking federal worker layoffs — A federal judge on October 16, 2025, issued a temporary injunction blocking the Trump administration's layoffs of more than 4,000 federal workers. The injunction halted the firings, though the administration signaled that additional cuts were planned and that the current layoffs represented only a partial reduction in the workforce.
  • Judge Illston grants temporary injunction blocking Trump administration federal employee firings during shutdown — Federal Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration's mass firings of federal employees during the government shutdown. The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by labor unions (AFGE and AFSCME) alleging that the Office of Management and Budget and Office of Personnel Management violated law by threatening and executing reductions in force during the shutdown. Judge Illston found evidence that OMB and OPM "took advantage of the lapse in government spending" and acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" in excess of authority.
  • Trump administration lays off 4,000 federal workers; federal judge issues temporary injunction — The Trump administration laid off more than 4,000 federal government workers during the shutdown. On October 16, 2025, a federal judge issued a temporary injunction blocking the firings. The Office of Management and Budget director, Russ Vought, stated that the 4,000 layoffs were merely a "snapshot" and that the total number could exceed 10,000. The administration indicated further cuts were expected.
Verified: Corroborated — 2+ independent news desks Week 39 – 2025-10-11–2025-10-17 wk39_IG_019
Jun 24, 2025 Trump administration postponed classified congressional briefings on the Iran strikes without explanation Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

Delaying legislative oversight briefings on a major military action undermines Congress's constitutional role in reviewing executive war powers.

Independently corroborated by5 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Trump administration postpones congressional briefings on Iran strikes without explanation — The Trump administration postponed classified congressional briefings scheduled for Tuesday regarding the recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, providing little explanation for the delay. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer criticized the postponement as "outrageous, evasive, and derelict," demanding answers on strike results, conflict scope, long-term strategy, and risks to Americans. Democrats have alleged the strikes violated the War Powers Act, which requires presidential consultation with Congress before military action.
  • Trump cancelled classified House briefing on Iran strikes without explanation — Rep. Pat Ryan (D-NY) announced that Trump cancelled a scheduled classified House briefing on the Iran strikes with no explanation. Ryan stated that Trump's team could not substantiate claims that nuclear facilities were "completely and totally obliterated" and that the administration lacked clarity on the status of 900 pounds of highly enriched uranium. Ryan also noted that briefers had conflicting conclusions about the operation's success and Iran's proximity to nuclear breakout.
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 23 – 2025-06-21–2025-06-27 wk23_IG_032
Jun 24, 2025 Trump cancelled a classified House briefing on the Iran strikes with no explanation Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

Canceling a scheduled intelligence briefing to Congress obstructs legislative review of a contested military operation's justification and outcome.

Independently corroborated by7 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Trump cancelled classified House briefing on Iran strikes without explanation — Rep. Pat Ryan (D-NY) announced that Trump cancelled a scheduled classified House briefing on the Iran strikes with no explanation. Ryan stated that Trump's team could not substantiate claims that nuclear facilities were "completely and totally obliterated" and that the administration lacked clarity on the status of 900 pounds of highly enriched uranium. Ryan also noted that briefers had conflicting conclusions about the operation's success and Iran's proximity to nuclear breakout.
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 23 – 2025-06-21–2025-06-27 wk23_IG_033
Jun 1, 2025 NPR and public radio stations sued over President Trump's order cutting funding to public media Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

The lawsuit asked courts to block executive retaliation against media funding and tested First Amendment limits on presidential power.

Independently corroborated by5 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • NPR and Public Radio Stations File Lawsuit Against Trump's Executive Order — NPR, along with three Colorado-based public radio stations, has filed a lawsuit challenging an executive order by President Trump that cuts federal funding to media outlets he deems "biased." The lawsuit argues that the order violates the First Amendment by targeting NPR and PBS for their news coverage, which the president considers biased. The executive order, signed on May 1, aims to strip direct and indirect funding from these public media organizations. NPR and its partners seek to have the order permanently blocked and declared unconstitutional.
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 20 – 2025-05-31–2025-06-06 wk20_IG_010