Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• DOJ social media account insulted reporter over Epstein files — The Department of Justice's official social media account responded to reporter Jamie Dupree's question about why the DOJ released documents it now claims are fabricated by calling him a "dope" and mocking critics who accused the department of breaking the law. The exchanges were described as unprofessional and unprecedented in prior administrations.

Supporting reports

• xAI's Grok generated nonconsensual sexualized images of women and children on X — xAI's Grok chatbot, integrated into X, generated approximately 6,700 sexually suggestive or nudifying images per hour beginning in late December 2025. The tool created nonconsensual sexualized images of real women and children, including cases where users submitted photos of minors as young as 14. Reuters identified multiple instances of child sexualization; the Internet Watch Foundation found criminal child sexual abuse material (CSAM) featuring children aged 11–13 on the dark web. Regulators in Australia, France, Indonesia, and Malaysia opened investigations or blocked access. Musk publicly minimized the issue, and xAI implemented limited restrictions (geoblocking in some jurisdictions, limiting free-user access) that researchers found ineffective within hours.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration posts Christian nationalist messaging across federal agencies on Christmas — On December 24–25, 2025, multiple federal agencies—including the State Department, Labor Department, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Defense—posted social media messages explicitly promoting Christian religious doctrine and framing the United States as a Christian nation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted about "Eternal Life through Christ"; DHS posted "Christ is Born!" and "We are blessed to share a nation and a Savior"; Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted about "the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ." These posts violated the Establishment Clause principle that government shall not promote or establish religion.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration posts Christian nationalist messaging across federal agencies on Christmas — On December 24–25, 2025, multiple federal agencies—including the State Department, Labor Department, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of Defense—posted social media messages explicitly promoting Christian religious doctrine and framing the United States as a Christian nation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted about "Eternal Life through Christ"; DHS posted "Christ is Born!" and "We are blessed to share a nation and a Savior"; Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted about "the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ." These posts violated the Establishment Clause principle that government shall not promote or establish religion.

Supporting reports

• Congressional Budget Office analysis shows tax cuts favor wealthy while cutting nutrition assistance — The Congressional Budget Office analyzed the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" and found that resources were reduced for lowest-income households while delivering substantial tax benefits to highest earners, including approximately one trillion dollars in tax cuts for the wealthiest one percent over the coming decade. The largest cuts to nutrition assistance in the program's history were enacted to fund this tax largesse.

Supporting reports

• Nvidia permitted to resume advanced chip sales to China after White House ballroom donations — Multiple wealthy benefactors, including Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, donated to the President's proposed White House ballroom renovation. Weeks after these donations, Nvidia was permitted to resume certain advanced chip sales to China under an arrangement requiring the company to remit 25 percent of such sales revenue to the United States government. No documented proof of quid pro quo exists in the public record, but the timing and sequence raise concerns about pay-to-play arrangements.
• Nvidia permitted to resume advanced chip sales to China under revenue-sharing arrangement — Weeks after Jensen Huang of Nvidia donated to the proposed White House ballroom, the administration permitted Nvidia to resume advanced chip sales to China under an arrangement requiring the company to remit 25% of sales revenue to the U.S. government.

Supporting reports

• President pardons Juan Orlando Hernández, former Honduras president convicted of drug trafficking — The President pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, former President of Honduras, who was convicted in American courts of drug trafficking and firearms offenses. The pardon occurred while the administration simultaneously conducted military operations ostensibly targeting drug trafficking, creating a contradiction between stated policy objectives and executive action.

Supporting reports

• Raven Geary struck by pepper ball during ICE detention facility protest — Chicago journalist Raven Geary was struck in the face by a pepper ball fired by an ICE officer on September 2025 while covering a protest outside the Broadview, Illinois detention facility. Geary was wearing a press pass and stated that ICE agents had been observing journalists for weeks, indicating they knew they were targeting press. Geary, fellow reporters, journalism organizations, and protesters filed a class-action lawsuit against ICE and the Department of Homeland Security, alleging violations of First and Fourth Amendment rights.

Supporting reports

• Freedom of the Press Foundation reports surge in journalist assaults during Trump administration — The Freedom of the Press Foundation released a report documenting 170 assaults against journalists in 2025 (through December 16), nearly matching the 175 assaults recorded across 2022–2024 combined. Most attacks occurred at protests against the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies. Law enforcement officials allegedly used batons and fired projectiles at journalists covering these events, despite visible press credentials. The foundation attributes the rise partly to anti-media rhetoric from Trump and other officials that delegitimizes journalists as targets.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge blocks Trump administration's conditional cuts to homeland security funding for states — US District Judge Mary McElroy of Rhode Island ruled on December 23, 2025, that the Trump administration's cuts of over $230 million in federal homeland security and FEMA grants to seven states and DC were unlawful. The administration had reduced funding for Connecticut, Delaware, Minnesota, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and DC as punishment for non-compliance with immigration enforcement policies. McElroy's 48-page decision found the cuts violated administrative law and held vital counterterrorism and law enforcement programs hostage to political demands. The Department of Homeland Security indicated it would appeal.

Supporting reports

• Justice Kavanaugh adds Fourth Amendment guardrails to immigration stops in concurrence — In a concurring footnote to the National Guard decision, Justice Brett Kavanaugh addressed the September Supreme Court ruling permitting immigration officers to stop individuals based on apparent race, ethnicity, language, or location. Kavanaugh wrote that the Fourth Amendment requires immigration stops be based on reasonable suspicion, remain brief, arrests require probable cause, and officers must not use excessive force or make stops based on race or ethnicity.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court rejected Trump administration's argument to deploy federalized National Guard in Chicago — On December 23, 2025, the Supreme Court rejected the Trump administration's legal argument that it possessed the power to deploy federalized National Guard troops in and around Chicago. The decision limited Trump's authority to use military forces within the United States without explicit congressional authorization or state consent.
• Supreme Court rejected Trump administration's National Guard deployment authority in Chicago — On December 23, 2025, the Supreme Court rejected the Trump administration's argument that it possessed the power to deploy federalized National Guard troops in and around Chicago. The 6-3 decision blocked the administration's attempt to militarize American cities without state consent.
• Supreme Court rejects Trump's National Guard deployment in Illinois as unlawful — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 preliminary ruling that President Trump's deployment of federalized National Guard troops in the Chicago area beginning in October violated the Posse Comitatus Act. The majority held that a president must first attempt to execute laws using regular U.S. military forces and may deploy the National Guard only if unable to do so with regular forces. The Court found the Government failed to identify statutory or constitutional authority permitting military enforcement of laws in Illinois.
• Supreme Court rejected Trump's National Guard deployment for immigration enforcement in Illinois — The Supreme Court rejected Trump's deployment of the National Guard to aid immigration enforcement in Illinois, ruling that federal law limits use of the National Guard to situations where regular military forces are insufficient. The majority found that the President does not have inherent authority to deploy the military to protect ICE property. Three justices (Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch) dissented.
• Supreme Court blocks Trump administration from deploying National Guard in Illinois — The Supreme Court blocked the Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops in Illinois as part of his mass immigration crackdown, ruling that the government "failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois." The decision represents a rare judicial check on executive power in the Trump administration.
• Supreme Court Denies Stay in Trump v. Illinois — On December 23, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the federal government's request for a stay in the case of Trump v. Illinois. This decision upheld a lower court's order that barred the Trump administration from deploying the federalized National Guard in Illinois for immigration enforcement actions. The case arose after the Trump administration federalized the Texas and Illinois National Guard to assist with immigration enforcement in Chicago, which was challenged by the state of Illinois. The Supreme Court's denial means the federal government cannot deploy the National Guard in Illinois pending further legal proceedings. Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch dissented from the decision.
• US Supreme Court blocks Trump national guard deployment to Chicago — The US Supreme Court denied the Trump administration's emergency request to lift a lower court order blocking the deployment of national guard troops to the Chicago area. In a 6-3 decision, the majority ruled that the government failed to meet the legal burden required to show it could not enforce immigration laws without federal military intervention. The decision upholds a ruling by US District Judge April Perry from October and signals potential impact on similar deployments in other Democratic-led cities.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department files proposed consent decree against LivCor for algorithmic rent coordination — The Department of Justice's Antitrust Division filed a proposed consent decree on December 23, 2025, against LivCor LLC, a Blackstone portfolio company and major U.S. landlord, to resolve allegations of algorithmic coordination and anticompetitive information sharing in rental markets. The decree, filed in the Middle District of North Carolina, follows similar settlements with RealPage, Cortland Management, and Greystar Management Services. If approved, it would prohibit LivCor from using algorithms that incorporate competitors' pricing data, sharing competitively sensitive information, and attending RealPage-hosted landlord meetings.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge restores whistleblower lawyer's security clearance after blocking White House revocation — Attorney Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer who represented whistleblowers critical of the Trump administration, had his security clearance revoked in March 2025 via presidential memo. Zaid sued in May, arguing the revocation was political retribution. On December 23, 2025, federal judge Amir H. Ali granted a preliminary injunction requiring immediate restoration of Zaid's clearance, finding the revocation was solely motivated by Zaid's representation of government-adverse clients and violated due process. The administration complied by January 13, 2026.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Zaid v. Executive Office of the President (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01365 — Judge Ali granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and denied the government's motion to dismiss. Judge Ali enjoined the government from giving effect to the security clearance revocations or denial of access to classified information as to Zaid. The preliminary injunction will not go into effect until Jan. 13, 2026.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court Denies Stay in Trump v. Illinois — On December 23, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the federal government's request for a stay in the case of Trump v. Illinois. This decision upheld a lower court's order that barred the Trump administration from deploying the federalized National Guard in Illinois for immigration enforcement actions. The case arose after the Trump administration federalized the Texas and Illinois National Guard to assist with immigration enforcement in Chicago, which was challenged by the state of Illinois. The Supreme Court's denial means the federal government cannot deploy the National Guard in Illinois pending further legal proceedings. Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch dissented from the decision.

Supporting reports

• White House takes control of Justice Department X account — The White House took over the X account of the Justice Department on December 23. On the same day, that account posted a message claiming that accusations in the Epstein files are "unfounded and false."
• Trump White House assumed control of DOJ social media accounts — Following bizarre exchanges on the DOJ's official social media account, reporting from Axios revealed that the Trump White House has assumed direct control over the Department of Justice's social media accounts. The article notes this explains the unprofessional tone of the exchanges and raises concerns about the politicization of the Justice Department.

Supporting reports

• Trump criticized Epstein document release and defended associates — Trump responded to reporters about the Epstein file release, characterizing it as a deflection from Republican achievements and expressing concern about photographs of associates including Bill Clinton and "other people that innocently met Epstein years ago." He criticized Rep. Thomas Massie for supporting the bill requiring document release, calling him a "real low life" and "loser."

Supporting reports

• DOJ announced rapid conclusion that Epstein-Nassar letter is forged — Hours after releasing Epstein documents, the DOJ announced that an alleged letter from Jeffrey Epstein to convicted sex offender Larry Nassar was "FAKE," concluding an investigation in approximately 120 minutes. The letter, postmarked days after Epstein's death, contained allegations about Trump. The DOJ's initial response questioned the letter's authenticity based on postmark location and timing, but investigative reporters noted the FBI had conducted a handwriting analysis in 2020 and questioned why that analysis was not cited in the DOJ's conclusion.
• DOJ investigates and debunks fake Epstein letter — The DOJ said it was investigating the validity of a 2019 letter signed by "J. Epstein" to convicted sex offender Larry Nassar included in the latest batch of Epstein files, which read in part, "Our President also shares our love of young, nubile girls." Just two hours later, the DOJ said the letter had been confirmed to be fake and tweeted that the release "serves as a reminder that just because a document is released by the [DOJ] does not make the allegations or claims within the document factual."
• DOJ confirms fake Epstein letter to Nassar referencing Trump — The Department of Justice announced on Tuesday that an alleged letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar, purportedly dated August 2019 and containing references to President Trump, is fraudulent. The FBI confirmed the letter's inauthenticity and listed reasons why authorities did not deem it genuine. The letter had been released as part of the Epstein files and contained sexually explicit language. The DOJ posted on X that the fake letter serves as a reminder that documents released by the department do not necessarily contain factual claims.

Supporting reports

• Epstein files released showing Trump's flights on Epstein's private jet — Documents released on December 23 include a January 7, 2020 email from a New York prosecutor stating that flight logs show Trump traveled on Epstein's private jet many more times than previously reported, including at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996, with at least four flights on which Ghislaine Maxwell was also present. One 1993 flight listed only Trump and Epstein as passengers; another listed only Epstein, Trump, and a then-20-year-old woman. Trump was mentioned more than 100 times in the released documents.
• DOJ released second tranche of Epstein documents with disclaimer minimizing Trump allegations — The Department of Justice released thousands of additional Epstein files in the early morning hours, accompanied by a statement characterizing some Trump-related allegations as "untrue and sensationalist." The documents included subpoena records from Mar-a-Lago (2021), notes from a U.S. attorney documenting Trump's flights on Epstein's private jet between 1993–1996 (at least 8 flights, with Maxwell present on at least 4), and FBI tips about Trump's involvement with Epstein. A federal prosecutor's 2020 internal email noted Trump had traveled on Epstein's jet "many more times than previously reported."
• Justice Department releases third batch of Epstein files — The Justice Department released its third batch of Epstein files, which included a January 2020 email from a federal prosecutor in New York claiming that flight logs showed Trump flew on Epstein's plane at least eight times in the 1990s, "including during the period we would expect to charge in a [Ghislaine] Maxwell case." The DOJ subsequently claimed some documents "contain untrue and sensationalist claims" against Trump and asserted the claims are "unfounded and false."

Supporting reports

• CBS pulled 60 Minutes segment on Trump-era deportations to CECOT hours before air — CBS postponed a completed 60 Minutes investigation into Trump administration deportations of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador's CECOT mega-prison, citing need for "additional reporting." Correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi publicly objected, characterizing the decision as political rather than editorial, despite the segment having cleared legal and standards review. The episode subsequently aired via Canadian broadcaster distribution and circulated online. The segment included interviews with former detainees, Human Rights Watch leadership, and UC Berkeley's Human Rights Center; DHS declined to participate.
• CBS Pulls 60 Minutes Segment on Trump-Era Deportations — CBS postponed a scheduled 60 Minutes segment investigating the Trump administration's deportation of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador's CECOT mega-prison, citing the need for "additional reporting." The segment, which included allegations of abuse and interviews with former detainees and human rights experts, was reportedly pulled for political reasons, according to correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi. Despite the postponement, the segment aired in Canada and circulated online. The delay has been criticized as a form of "soft censorship," potentially diminishing the segment's impact on public accountability.

Supporting reports

• Trump expressed concern about continued release of Epstein files at Mar-a-Lago news conference — At a news conference from Mar-a-Lago, Trump expressed frustration that Americans were still discussing the Epstein files, stating that people were "very angry" about pictures being released of individuals who had "nothing to do with Epstein" but appeared in photographs with him. Trump claimed that the release was ruining reputations and that "a lot of Republicans" shared this concern.
• Trump expresses sympathy for figures named in Epstein files release, resists full disclosure — President Trump commented on the Justice Department's release of Jeffrey Epstein files, expressing concern that people who "innocently met" Epstein could have their reputations damaged. Trump stated sympathy for Bill Clinton and other prominent figures whose associations with Epstein were documented in the released materials. Trump characterized the release as a distraction from Republican achievements and suggested the disclosure was unfair to individuals with no wrongdoing. The Epstein Files Transparency Act, which Trump signed, mandated complete release by a specified deadline, but DOJ has released only one batch so far.

Supporting reports

• Senator Tommy Tuberville calls for mass deportation of Muslim Americans — On December 22, 2025, the Alabama Reflector reported that Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) escalated attacks on Muslim Americans by demanding their mass deportation. Tuberville, who is running for governor of Alabama, has made clear that he "works for a very white, very Christian and very wealthy sliver of the population of Alabama" and "considers large numbers of people who live here aliens or threats to public safety." When criticized, Tuberville dismissed concerns as "pearl-clutching" and performative outrage.

Supporting reports

• ProPublica reports Deputy AG Blanche held crypto investments while ending investigations — ProPublica reported that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche held more than $150,000 in crypto investments when he issued a memo one month into his tenure to end investigations into crypto companies, dealers, and exchanges initiated during the Biden administration. A former White House ethics lawyer called the situation "an obvious conflict of interest."

Supporting reports

• Justice Department sues District of Columbia over semi-automatic firearm registration ban — The Department of Justice, through its Civil Rights Division and newly established Second Amendment Section, filed a lawsuit against the District of Columbia and its Metropolitan Police Department, alleging that D.C.'s ban on AR-15 and other semi-automatic firearms violates the Second Amendment. The suit challenges the District's registration requirement and pattern of refusing to register protected firearms, claiming the policy unconstitutionally restricts law-abiding citizens' rights to own commonly used weapons for lawful purposes including self-defense.
• Justice Department sues DC over AR-15 ban — The Justice Department sued Washington, DC and its Metropolitan Police Department, arguing that DC's gun laws banning AR-15 style weapons—which have been used in the deadliest mass shootings in the US—are "unconstitutional" and violate the Second Amendment. The suit represents federal intervention to overturn local gun safety measures.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed in O'Neill v. Hartman (D. Md. 1:25-cv-04228) — A transgender data scientist employed by the National Security Agency filed a complaint in federal district court on December 22, 2025, challenging Executive Order 14168, issued by President Trump on January 20, 2025. The order directs federal agencies to implement policies based on sex rather than gender and prevents accommodation of transitioning employees. The plaintiff alleges the NSA created a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and seeks a declaration that the executive order violates Title VII, an injunction against its implementation, and compensatory damages.