Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Trump calls for impeachment of federal judge James Boasberg — Following the administration's defiance of his deportation order, Trump called for the impeachment of US District Judge James Boasberg, describing him as a "radical left lunatic." House Republicans subsequently introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Elon Musk, Trump's top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges and is donating to Republicans in Congress who support such efforts.
• Trump calls for impeachment of federal judge over deportation ruling — President Trump publicly called for the impeachment of a top Washington DC federal judge who ruled to halt the deportation of hundreds of Venezuelans. The judge's ruling blocked an administration action. Trump's call prompted Chief Justice John Roberts to issue a rare public statement opposing impeachment of judges for their rulings. The incident reflects Trump's broader campaign to delegitimize judges who rule against his executive orders.
• Trump attacked Judge Boasberg over case assignment — Trump posted a statement attacking Judge James Boasberg, Chief Judge of the D.C. District Court, for being assigned to hear a lawsuit in the Signal case. Trump claimed it was "statistically impossible" for a Republican to win before Boasberg, accused the judge of "Trump Derangement Syndrome," and called for an "immediate investigation" of what he characterized as a "rigged system."
• Trump calls for impeachment of Judge Boasberg after El Salvador deportation ruling — President Trump called for the impeachment of US District Judge James Boasberg after Boasberg's ruling blocking deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. The ruling earned Trump a rare public rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts. Boasberg had previously been targeted by Trump and was subsequently assigned to a lawsuit alleging Trump officials violated federal record-keeping laws by using Signal group chats to discuss military action against Yemen's Houthis.

Supporting reports

• Judge issues restraining order against DOGE — U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander issued a temporary restraining order against the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), prohibiting the Social Security Administration from sharing personally identifiable information with DOGE. The judge criticized DOGE for lacking justification for its access to SSA records, highlighting concerns about privacy and government overreach.
• DOGE conducted unauthorized searches of Social Security data after court restraining order — According to the Department of Justice court filing, DOGE team members conducted searches of personally identifiable information on March 24, 2025, even after the Social Security Administration believed it had revoked all such access in compliance with a federal court's temporary restraining order issued March 20, 2025. The final search occurred at approximately 9:30 a.m., with full access terminated by noon that day. DOGE members had also been granted access to systems beyond what the agency previously reported to the court, including employee records and personnel access information.
• Federal judge blocked DOGE access to federal agency data — A federal judge temporarily blocked Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing the private data of individuals at several federal agencies. The block prevents DOGE from obtaining sensitive personal information held by the government.
• DOGE staffer signed agreement to share Social Security data with election denial group — In March 2025, a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer embedded at the Social Security Administration signed a "Voter Data Agreement" with a political advocacy group seeking to overturn election results in certain states. According to a court filing by government lawyers, the DOGE employee sent the executed agreement on March 24, 2025. Emails suggest DOGE team members could have been asked to assist the group by accessing SSA data to match voter rolls. The SSA referred the involved employees to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel for possible Hatch Act violations.
• Federal judge blocks DOGE access to federal employee personal databases — On February 3, Popular Information reported that DOGE staff at the Office of Personnel Management received unprecedented access to databases containing sensitive personal information for millions of federal employees. A week later, a coalition of labor unions representing federal workers sued OPM citing Popular Information's report seven times. On March 24, a federal judge issued an injunction blocking DOGE's access to the databases.

Supporting reports

• Judge challenges Trump deportation order — Federal Judge James Boasberg challenged the Trump administration's deportation of suspected Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act. Boasberg attempted to prevent the deportation flights and demanded details of the aircrafts' itineraries to ensure compliance with his order. The administration claims the flights departed before the order, while Boasberg disputes this and has threatened consequences for non-compliance. The White House labeled Boasberg a "Democrat activist," asserting he lacks authority to challenge the president's executive power.

Supporting reports

• Rep. Gill introduced articles of impeachment against Boasberg — Republican Rep. Brandon Gill of Texas tweeted that he introduced articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg, baselessly saying he is "guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and should be removed from office."
• Articles of impeachment filed against Judge Boasberg — Republican Congressman Brandon Gill from Texas filed articles of impeachment against Chief US District Judge James Boasberg. This action follows Boasberg's issuance of a temporary restraining order halting deportations under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. The impeachment articles were filed after former President Donald Trump called for Boasberg's removal, labeling him a "Radical Left Lunatic" and a "troublemaker." This move is seen as an attempt to undermine judicial independence and retaliate against a judge for his legal decisions.

Supporting reports

• Chief Justice Roberts responds to Trump — Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement in response to Trump's call for Judge Boasberg's impeachment, emphasizing that impeachment is not an appropriate response to judicial decisions. Roberts highlighted the appellate review process as the proper channel for addressing disagreements with court rulings.
• Trump calls for Judge Boasberg's impeachment — Former President Trump called for the impeachment of Judge James Boasberg after a ruling against him on migrant flights. Trump criticized the judge as a "Radical Left Lunatic" and questioned his legitimacy, despite Boasberg's confirmation by the Senate with a unanimous vote.
• Chief Justice Roberts rebuked Trump on judicial rhetoric — After Trump referred to Judge Boasberg as a "radical left lunatic" and called for his impeachment, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare public rebuke, stating: "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision."
• Trump calls for impeachment of Judge Boasberg — President Donald Trump publicly called U.S. District Judge James Boasberg a "Radical Left Lunatic" and suggested that judges who disagree with him should be impeached. This statement drew a rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts, who emphasized that impeachment is not an appropriate response to judicial disagreement.
• Chief Justice Roberts Responds to Trump's Call for Judicial Impeachment — Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement rebuking President Trump's suggestion that judges who disagree with him should be impeached. Roberts emphasized that impeachment is not an appropriate response to judicial decisions and reaffirmed the importance of the appellate review process. This response came after Trump labeled Judge Boasberg a "Radical Left Lunatic" and called for his impeachment.
• Trump calls for impeachment of Judge James Boasberg — Former President Donald Trump has called for the impeachment of Judge James Boasberg, a federal judge who issued a temporary restraining order to halt deportations of alleged Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Trump labeled Boasberg a "radical left lunatic" and criticized his decision, which was meant to stop deportations that the administration argued were necessary. The call for impeachment has been met with criticism from various legal experts and Republican senators, who argue that impeachment is not an appropriate response to judicial decisions.
• Chief Justice Roberts criticizes Trump's impeachment call — Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement criticizing President Trump's call for the impeachment of Judge Boasberg, emphasizing that impeachment is not an appropriate response to judicial disagreements and that the appellate review process exists for such matters.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration filed to dissolve injunctions in deportation case — The Trump administration filed a late-night 35-page motion on Monday to dissolve the injunctions and dismiss the case related to the use of the Alien Enemies Act for deporting Venezuelan nationals. The administration is challenging two injunctions: one preventing the deportation of five Venezuelans and another expanding the order to cover all removals under the Act. The administration argues that the deportation flights were outside the judge's jurisdiction once they left U.S. airspace.
• Trump administration sought removal of Judge Boasberg — The Trump administration sent a letter to an appeals court calling for Judge Boasberg to be removed from hearing the deportation case associated with the Alien Enemies Act, escalating efforts to disqualify the judge.
• DOJ argued judge's order was not enforceable — In a court filing, the Department of Justice argued that Judge Boasberg's verbal order was "not enforceable as an injunction," challenging the judge's authority to issue the restraining order blocking Alien Enemies Act deportations.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders reinstatement of fired probationary staff — A federal judge in California, William H. Alsup, issued a preliminary injunction to reinstate thousands of probationary federal employees who were fired from six federal agencies. The ruling is part of a lawsuit filed by the American Federation of Government Employees. The judge criticized the Trump administration's justification for the firings, stating that claims of poor performance were false. The order affects employees from the Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Energy, Interior, and Treasury. The judge also restricted the Office of Personnel Management from advising agencies on terminations.
• Judge orders Musk to comply with lawsuit — U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ordered Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency to turn over their records and answer questions in response to a lawsuit filed by 14 attorneys general from Democratic-dominated states. They are required to comply within three weeks.
• Judge orders rehiring of federal employees — Judge William Alsup ordered the Trump administration to immediately rehire tens of thousands of federal employees from various departments who were terminated due to Elon Musk's DOGE cuts. The judge criticized the administration for allegedly firing employees under false pretenses of performance issues, calling it a lie and expressing frustration over the lack of transparency in the process.
• Federal judge reinstates fired probationary workers — On March 13, 2025, a federal judge in California granted a preliminary injunction to reinstate thousands of fired probationary workers at federal agencies. This decision was part of a lawsuit filed by the American Federation of Government Employees. The ruling applies to employees from several departments, including Defense and Veterans Affairs, who were dismissed under claims of poor performance. The judge criticized these claims as false and prohibited the Office of Personnel Management from advising on terminations.
• Federal judges rule against Musk's firings — Two federal judges issued rulings against Elon Musk's "department of government efficiency" (Doge) regarding the firing of probationary employees. Judge William H. Alsup in California ruled that fired employees must be offered their jobs back, criticizing the process as a "sham." In Maryland, Judge James Bredar issued a temporary restraining order blocking further firings at 18 federal agencies. These rulings challenge Musk's cost-cutting measures, which have faced public disapproval and legal scrutiny.
• Judge orders reinstatement of federal workers — U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that federal agencies must immediately offer jobs back to thousands of probationary workers who were purged from the government early in President Trump's administration. The judge stated that the mass firings did not follow legal protocols. Additionally, Judge James Bredar ordered the reinstatement of these workers across multiple federal departments, indicating that the government likely engaged in an illegal scheme regarding the firings.
• Judge rules against mass firings — U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that the mass firings of probationary workers from various federal departments did not comply with legal requirements. The judge expressed skepticism about the government's claims regarding the firings and criticized the lack of transparency in the process.

Supporting reports

• District Judge Howell blocks enforcement of Trump executive order against Perkins Coie — On 12 March, federal District Judge Beryl Howell issued a ruling blocking the Trump administration from enforcing key parts of its executive order against law firm Perkins Coie. The judge stated the order "runs head-on into the wall of first amendment protections," finding that the punitive sanctions violated constitutional protections for attorneys and their clients.
• Judge blocks Trump order against Perkins Coie — A federal judge, Beryl Howell, temporarily blocked a significant portion of an executive order issued by Donald Trump. The order targeted the law firm Perkins Coie, which had ties to Hillary Clinton, by stripping its lawyers of security clearances and barring federal engagement with them. Howell ruled that Trump's use of national security as a pretext to punish the firm was unjustified and likened it to a "bill of attainder," which is unconstitutional. The restraining order halts most of the executive order's effects, except for the revocation of clearances.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge issues restraining order over EPA's climate grant cancellation — Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan issued a restraining order against the Trump administration's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) following the abrupt cancellation of climate research grants worth billions of dollars. The judge demanded evidence of wrongdoing from the EPA to justify the cancellation. The case involves Climate United, which sued for access to $7 billion in frozen grants. The judge has asked both parties to submit new filings, with Climate United amending its lawsuit and the government providing evidence of alleged wrongdoing.

Supporting reports

• Judge orders Musk to comply with lawsuit — U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ordered Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency to turn over their records and answer questions in response to a lawsuit filed by 14 attorneys general from Democratic-dominated states. They are required to comply within three weeks.
• Motion granted — New Mexico et al. v. Musk (D.D.C.) 1.25-cv-00429 — Judge Tanya Chutkan granted Plaintiffs' motion for expedited discovery and ordered Elon Musk and DOGE to produce the requested documents and respond to the interrogatories and requests for admissions in Plaintiffs' discovery requests.
• Judge orders Musk to produce records on Doge — A federal judge, Tanya Chutkan, has ordered Elon Musk and his "department of government efficiency" (Doge) to produce documents related to their cost-cutting operations within the federal government. This order is part of a lawsuit filed by 14 Democratic state attorneys general, alleging that Musk has been operating unconstitutionally by wielding powers reserved for Senate-confirmed officials. The documents are intended to clarify Musk's authority and determine if Doge's activities should be halted. The order does not extend to Donald Trump.
• Judge orders Musk and DOGE to comply with records request — On March 12, 2025, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ordered Elon Musk and the DOGE service to turn over their records and answer questions in response to a lawsuit by 14 attorneys general from Democratic-dominated states. They have three weeks to comply.

Supporting reports

• White House issues memorandum directing agencies to enforce Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) bond requirements in litigation against the federal government — The White House issued a presidential memorandum directing executive departments and agencies to ensure that federal district courts require plaintiffs seeking injunctions against the government to post security bonds under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c). The memorandum characterizes recent injunctions obtained by activist organizations as "sweeping" and "meritless," and directs agencies to request courts impose bond requirements to cover potential costs and damages if injunctions are later found wrongful. The directive applies to all lawsuits seeking injunctions against the federal government where agencies can demonstrate expected monetary damages, absent extraordinary circumstances.

Supporting reports

• Federal judges propose transferring US Marshals Service from DOJ to judicial control — Federal judges discussed a proposal to move armed security personnel (US Marshals Service) away from Department of Justice control under Attorney General Pam Bondi and place them under the direct control of Chief Justice John Roberts. The proposal emerged at a March 2025 judicial conference meeting of approximately 50 federal judges amid concerns that the Trump administration might weaponize the Marshals Service by withdrawing protection from judges who rule against the president. Judge John Coughenour endorsed the transfer as necessary given recent threats and intimidation targeting judges.

Supporting reports

• Elon Musk calls for impeachment of judges — Elon Musk urged Republicans in Congress to impeach federal judges who rule against the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This call for impeachment is part of a broader strategy to influence judicial decisions and reflects tensions between the judiciary and executive policies under the Trump administration.
• Elon Musk and House Republicans Allegedly Intimidating Judges — A report has emerged alleging that Elon Musk and certain House Republicans are involved in efforts to intimidate judges. The details of these actions, including the methods of intimidation and the specific judges targeted, have not been fully disclosed. This development is part of a broader concern about the influence of powerful individuals and political figures on the judiciary, which could have significant implications for the independence of the courts and the rule of law.

Supporting reports

• Trump urged impeachment of Judge James Boasberg and attacked him as "radical left lunatic" — Trump in March 2025 urged the impeachment of DC federal judge James Boasberg and falsely branded him a "radical left lunatic" after Boasberg issued a ruling halting the deportation to El Salvador of scores of Venezuelan immigrants with alleged gang ties. The attack prompted Chief Justice John Roberts to issue hours-later criticism of political attacks on the judiciary and warnings against calls to impeach judges for their decisions.

Supporting reports

• SEC halts fraud prosecution of Chinese national — The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has halted its fraud prosecution against Chinese crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun. Sun, who was charged in March 2023 with marketing unregistered securities and manipulating the crypto market, had recently invested $75 million in World Liberty Financial (WLF), a venture backed by Donald Trump. This investment resulted in a significant financial benefit for Trump. The SEC and Sun filed a joint request for a 60-day stay to explore a potential resolution, which was granted by a federal judge. This development raises questions about the SEC's enforcement actions and potential settlements.

Supporting reports

• SEC halts prosecution of Justin Sun — The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) halted its prosecution of Justin Sun, a Chinese cryptocurrency entrepreneur charged with securities fraud, following his financial contributions to Trump, raising concerns about political influence on regulatory actions.
• SEC halts fraud prosecution of Chinese national — The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has halted its fraud prosecution against Chinese crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun. Sun, who was charged in March 2023 with marketing unregistered securities and manipulating the crypto market, had recently invested $75 million in World Liberty Financial (WLF), a venture backed by Donald Trump. This investment resulted in a significant financial benefit for Trump. The SEC and Sun filed a joint request for a 60-day stay to explore a potential resolution, which was granted by a federal judge. This development raises questions about the SEC's enforcement actions and potential settlements.

Supporting reports

• Elon Musk uses X platform to urge impeachment of judges — Elon Musk, using his social media platform X where he has over 200 million followers, has repeatedly urged the impeachment of judges whose rulings he dislikes. On February 25, Musk stated: "The only way to restore rule of the people in America is to impeach judges." These posts target judges who have blocked or delayed Trump administration actions and Musk's "department of government efficiency" initiatives.

Supporting reports

• Department of Justice announces removal of constitutional protections for administrative law judges — The Department of Justice, through Chief of Staff Chad Mizelle, announced on February 20, 2025, that it has determined multiple layers of removal restrictions protecting administrative law judges (ALJs) are unconstitutional. The department stated it is removing these protections to restore "constitutional accountability" and ensure Executive Branch officials answer to the President. The announcement invokes Supreme Court precedent but does not specify which case or provide legal analysis.

Supporting reports

• DOJ motion to dismiss Eric Adams indictment — Emil Bove, acting deputy attorney general under Trump, appeared in a Manhattan courtroom to argue for the dismissal of a corruption indictment against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The motion to dismiss was based on the rationale that continuing the prosecution would impede Adams's ability to collaborate with Trump's immigration agenda. The judge, Dale E Ho, questioned the appropriateness of this rationale, which could set a precedent for dismissing cases against other officials to facilitate cooperation with the president's policies. The hearing concluded without a decision, leaving Adams's legal future uncertain.
• Justice Department dismisses case against Eric Adams — Emil Bove, the acting deputy attorney general, led the Justice Department in dismissing a corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams. The decision, aligned with the Trump administration's directive, was justified by Bove as necessary to avoid interfering with Adams' governance and to support federal immigration policies. The dismissal was formalized with signatures from Bove and two trial attorneys. This move reflects a shift in the Justice Department's approach, prioritizing political agendas over prosecutorial independence, and has led to multiple resignations within the department.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department dropped charges against Eric Adams — The U.S. Department of Justice requested the dropping of corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams, which included conspiracy, wire fraud, and soliciting illegal foreign campaign contributions. This decision led to the resignation of seven prosecutors who were involved in the case, as they refused to comply with the directive. The charges were widely perceived as being dropped in exchange for Adams' cooperation with the Trump administration's immigration policies.
• DOJ drops bribery case against Eric Adams — The U.S. Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, has ordered the dismissal of bribery charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. This decision has sparked controversy and concern over potential political motivations, as Adams has been seen as aligning with Trump. The move has led to resignations within the Justice Department, including the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, who accused the DOJ of political interference. The decision has raised questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the rule of law.
• DOJ motion to dismiss Eric Adams indictment — Emil Bove, acting deputy attorney general under Trump, appeared in a Manhattan courtroom to argue for the dismissal of a corruption indictment against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The motion to dismiss was based on the rationale that continuing the prosecution would impede Adams's ability to collaborate with Trump's immigration agenda. The judge, Dale E Ho, questioned the appropriateness of this rationale, which could set a precedent for dismissing cases against other officials to facilitate cooperation with the president's policies. The hearing concluded without a decision, leaving Adams's legal future uncertain.
• Justice Department dismisses case against Eric Adams — Emil Bove, the acting deputy attorney general, led the Justice Department in dismissing a corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams. The decision, aligned with the Trump administration's directive, was justified by Bove as necessary to avoid interfering with Adams' governance and to support federal immigration policies. The dismissal was formalized with signatures from Bove and two trial attorneys. This move reflects a shift in the Justice Department's approach, prioritizing political agendas over prosecutorial independence, and has led to multiple resignations within the department.

Supporting reports

• Motion granted — AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. United States Department of State (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00400 — Judge Amir Ali granted a TRO in this case and in Global Health Council v. Trump on narrower terms than originally requested. The order enjoins implementation on the blanket suspension of foreign aid funding, but does not enjoin enforcement or implementation of Executive Order 14169, individual personnel decisions, or termination of individual contracts.
• Motion granted — Global Health Council v. Trump (D.D.C.) ​​1:25-cv-00402 — Judge Amir Ali granted Plaintiff's motion for a TRO in this case and in AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. United States Department of State , No. 1:25-cv-00400, on narrower terms than originally requested. The order enjoins implementation on the blanket suspension of foreign aid funding, but does not enjoin enforcement or implementation of Executive Order 14169, individual personnel decisions, or termination of individual contracts.
• U.S. District Judge orders disbursement of impounded foreign aid — U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the Trump administration to disburse foreign aid that had been impounded. The judge rejected the administration's justification for the suspension, stating that it was not a rational precursor to reviewing programs and had caused significant disruption to agreements with various organizations.
• U.S. District Judge orders Trump administration to disburse impounded foreign aid — On February 13, 2025, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the Trump administration to release foreign aid that had been impounded. The judge rejected the administration's justification for the suspension, stating that it disrupted numerous agreements and lacked a rational basis.

Supporting reports

• Interim US Attorney resigns over corruption case — Danielle Sassoon, the interim US Attorney handling the NYC Mayor Eric Adams' public corruption case, resigned after refusing to drop charges despite pressure from DOJ Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. Sassoon's resignation follows a letter to AG Pam Bondi detailing alleged unethical proposals from Adams' attorneys. Other senior US Attorneys also resigned in protest, highlighting concerns over political interference.
• US Attorney resigns over refusal to drop charges — Danielle Sassoon, the interim US Attorney in charge of the NYC Mayor Eric Adams’ public corruption case, resigned after refusing to drop the charges despite demands from DOJ Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. Sassoon wrote a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, outlining an alleged quid pro quo proposal from Adams' attorneys. Following Sassoon's resignation, senior US Attorneys in New York also refused to dismiss the case and resigned in protest. Bove, who previously served as Trump's criminal defense attorney, is involved in the case.
• DOJ pressures Public Integrity Section lawyers — DOJ leadership reportedly pressured Public Integrity Section lawyers to decide within an hour who would dismiss the indictment against NYC Mayor Eric Adams, threatening to fire all if none complied. This move has sparked resignations and widespread dismay within the legal community, reminiscent of the 1973 Saturday Night Massacre.
• Memo issued to dismiss Adams case for political reasons — A memo was issued stating that the criminal case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams was dismissed for political reasons, citing that the case restricted his ability to assist in deportation efforts. The memo admitted the decision was not based on evidence or law, raising ethical concerns about the DOJ's actions.
• Prosecutor Hagan Scotten resigns over DOJ pressure — Prosecutor Hagan Scotten resigned after refusing to dismiss a corruption case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams. Scotten's resignation letter criticized the use of prosecutorial power to influence elected officials, stating that he would not comply with such directives. His resignation follows that of co-counsel Danielle Sassoon, highlighting internal DOJ tensions over the case.

Supporting reports

• Vice President Vance asserts executive power over judicial authority — On February 9, Vice President JD Vance tweeted that "Judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power," articulating an administration position that the executive branch is not bound by judicial constraints on its authority. This statement reflects the broader administration posture of resistance to adverse court rulings.
• Vice President Vance defends executive power — Vice President J.D. Vance defended the executive branch's authority in response to the federal judge's ruling, asserting that judges should not control the executive's "legitimate power." This statement reflects a growing trend among Republican leaders to challenge judicial oversight and assert executive dominance.

Supporting reports

• Elon Musk and Tom Cotton attack judge over DOGE records — Elon Musk and Senator Tom Cotton criticized a judge who temporarily blocked DOGE employees from accessing sensitive Treasury records. Cotton labeled the judge an "outlaw" and suggested he should be barred from hearing future cases against the Trump administration. This attack on the judiciary highlights ongoing tensions between the administration and the courts.
• Elon Musk calls for impeachment of federal judge blocking DOGE access to treasury records — On 9 February, after federal judge Paul Engelmayer blocked the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing millions of sensitive and personal treasury records, billionaire Elon Musk baselessly accused the judge of being a "corrupt judge protecting corruption" on X and called for his impeachment. Musk, who donated close to $300 million to Trump's campaign, has approximately 200 million followers on the platform. Trump subsequently echoed these attacks.

Supporting reports

• Judge halts DOGE's access to Treasury systems — U.S. District Judge Engelmayer issued an emergency order halting DOGE's attempts to access U.S. Treasury systems, temporarily preventing "special government employees" from accessing these systems. The court also ordered the destruction of any downloaded material from the Treasury Department's records. A hearing is set for February 14 to resolve the matter, with Judge Jeannette Vargas now permanently assigned to the case. The ruling has sparked calls for the judge's impeachment from Elon Musk and JD Vance, who have suggested ignoring the court order.