Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• NAACP files lawsuit to block Tennessee redistricting — The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) filed a lawsuit to block Tennessee's redistricting that eliminated the majority-Black 9th Congressional District.
• NAACP Tennessee filed emergency lawsuit to block congressional map — Less than three hours after Gov. Bill Lee signed the new congressional map into law on May 7, the NAACP Tennessee State Conference filed an emergency lawsuit in Davidson County Chancery Court to block the map. The lawsuit argues that the mid-decade redistricting violates Tennessee statutory law and the state constitution.
• NAACP Tennessee filed emergency petition challenging redistricting — On May 7, the NAACP Tennessee State Conference filed an emergency petition in Davidson County Chancery Court arguing that lawmakers violated Tennessee law and the state constitution when they repealed the mid-decade redistricting ban during a special session whose stated purpose did not include that repeal. The Tennessee Supreme Court named a three-judge panel to hear the case.
• NAACP Tennessee files state court lawsuit challenging new congressional map — The NAACP Tennessee State Conference filed a lawsuit in state court on May 7, 2026, to block Tennessee's newly enacted congressional map that eliminates the majority-Black Memphis district. The lawsuit challenges the redistricting as a violation of voting rights protections.
• Tennessee Democrats sued to block new congressional map eliminating majority-Black district — Tennessee Democrats filed a lawsuit to block the new congressional map passed Thursday by state Republicans that eliminated the state's only majority-Black district. The action targets a map that was designed to reduce Black electoral representation and voting power. The lawsuit challenges the Republican-controlled legislature's effort to dilute minority voting strength.

Supporting reports

• Tennessee repealed 1972 law prohibiting mid-decade redistricting — To enable the new congressional map, Tennessee lawmakers repealed a 1972 state law that prohibited mid-decade redistricting. Gov. Bill Lee signed the repeal approximately one hour after it cleared the Republican supermajority. The repeal was necessary to make the rapid redistricting legally possible and was enacted during a special session whose stated purpose did not include redistricting reform, according to legal challenges filed by the NAACP Tennessee State Conference.
• Tennessee repealed law prohibiting mid-decade redistricting — As part of the special legislative session, Tennessee's Republican supermajority repealed the state's longstanding law that prohibited redistricting between census cycles. The legislature also removed the requirement that election officials notify voters by mail if redistricting changed their polling places or precincts.
• Tennessee legislature enacts new congressional map eliminating majority-Black Memphis district — Tennessee's Republican-controlled legislature enacted a new congressional map on May 7, 2026, that carves up the state's only majority-Black congressional district centered in Memphis, splitting it across three Republican-leaning districts. Gov. Bill Lee called a special session on May 5, the legislature repealed a state law prohibiting mid-decade redistricting since 1972, drew the new map, and passed it on May 7. Lee signed it into law the same day. The action followed the Supreme Court's April 29 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which weakened Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act protections for voters of color in redistricting cases.
• Tennessee Republicans approved congressional map dismantling majority-Black district — On May 7, Tennessee Republican lawmakers approved a new congressional map that splits Black voters in Memphis and Shelby County across three majority-white districts stretching hundreds of miles into central Tennessee, dismantling the state's only majority-Black congressional district. The map was unveiled only 24 hours before the vote. To enable mid-decade redistricting, lawmakers first repealed a 1972 state law prohibiting it; Gov. Bill Lee signed the repeal within an hour. The ACLU and civil-rights groups argue the map constitutes intentional racial discrimination and dilutes Black voting power, though Republican leaders defend it as partisan rather than racial redistricting.
• Tennessee Republicans passed new congressional map carving majority-Black Memphis into three Republican districts — On May 7, Tennessee's Republican supermajority passed a new congressional map that splits Shelby County (majority-Black Memphis) across three Republican-controlled districts, weakening the political power of the state's only majority-Black congressional district. The legislature also repealed its longstanding law prohibiting mid-decade redistricting and removed the requirement that election officials notify voters of redistricting changes. Gov. Bill Lee signed the map into law the same day. Protesters filled the state Capitol; state troopers cleared the House gallery; Democratic lawmakers walked out. The NAACP Tennessee State Conference filed an emergency lawsuit in Davidson County Chancery Court within three hours to block the map.
• Tennessee weakened voter-notice requirements for redistricting changes — The redistricting package weakened direct voter-notice requirements. County election officials will no longer be required under state law to directly notify voters by mail when redistricting changes affect their polling-place assignments, though separate funding was included to reimburse counties that choose to send notices. The Secretary of State's office announced a special qualifying period for U.S. House candidates through noon on May 15, and local reporting indicates the new districts bring changes for some voters and candidates.
• Tennessee legislature cracked Memphis into three districts, diluting Black voting power — The Tennessee legislature, in emergency special session called by Governor Bill Lee, repealed its own law prohibiting mid-decade redistricting and then cracked Memphis—where 60 percent of residents are Black—into three districts. This diluted Black voting power by swamping Black voters with white suburban voters. The action targeted Tennessee's only Democratic member of Congress, who represented Memphis.
• Tennessee legislature redraws congressional maps to eliminate majority-Black 9th District — The Tennessee state legislature voted to redraw congressional district maps, cracking the city of Memphis into three pieces and joining them to white suburbs, thereby converting all state districts to Republican seats. This action directly eliminated the majority-Black 9th Congressional District, stripping Black voters of effective representation. The redistricting followed the Supreme Court's April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down race-conscious district creation under the Voting Rights Act, triggering a wave of Republican-led redistricting nationwide to eliminate Democratic representation.
• Tennessee governor signed new congressional map into law — Gov. Bill Lee signed the new congressional redistricting map into law on May 7, the same day the Republican supermajority passed it. The map redraws the state's only Democratic-held U.S. House seat (Tennessee's 9th District, held by Rep. Steve Cohen and rooted in majority-Black Memphis) by splitting Shelby County across three Republican-leaning districts.
• Tennessee Republicans redrew congressional maps eliminating Democratic district — Tennessee Republicans redrew the state's congressional maps behind closed doors with the explicit goal of eliminating the single Democratic congressional district in the state. The new map breaks up the state's only Black-majority district. Democratic Representative Justin Pearson confronted the Sergeant at Arms who was blocking the door during the redistricting process and was ultimately escorted out by state troopers.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department files civil denaturalization complaint against convicted Cuban spy — The Department of Justice filed a civil denaturalization complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Victor Manuel Rocha, a Colombian-born former U.S. Ambassador convicted in 2024 of serving as an unregistered agent for Cuba. Rocha admitted to spying for Cuba beginning in 1973, five years before his 1978 naturalization. The complaint alleges he obtained citizenship through false statements under penalty of perjury regarding Communist Party affiliation and support for communism. Rocha is currently serving a 15-year sentence. The DOJ seeks revocation of his naturalization on seven independent grounds.
• Department of Justice announces denaturalization actions against 12 individuals — The Department of Justice announced it filed civil denaturalization complaints in various U.S. district courts against 12 naturalized citizens, alleging they obtained citizenship through fraud, concealment of material facts, or willful misrepresentation. The allegations include providing material support to terrorist organizations (Al-Qaeda, al-Shabaab), committing war crimes, sexually abusing minors, espionage for Cuba, firearms trafficking, immigration fraud, and identity fraud. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche characterized the actions as correcting "egregious violations" of the immigration system. The complaints seek revocation of naturalization certificates under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Supporting reports

• Alabama governor calls for redistricting despite federal court injunction — Alabama's Republican governor Kay Ivey called for the state to redraw its congressional maps despite a federal court injunction forbidding redistricting before the 2030 census. The call came as part of a broader Republican effort to eliminate majority-Black districts following the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais decision.

Supporting reports

• Multiple Republican-led states redraw maps to eliminate Democratic seats — Republican-dominated legislatures in Ohio, Missouri, North Carolina, Texas, and Florida have completed redistricting to pick up Republican seats, while Tennessee, South Carolina, Louisiana, and Alabama are engaged in that process. This coordinated wave of redistricting, triggered by the Supreme Court's Louisiana v. Callais decision, is designed to eliminate majority-Black districts and Democratic representation across multiple states.
• Louisiana, Alabama, and South Carolina began redistricting efforts — Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, Republicans in Louisiana, Alabama, and South Carolina have taken steps toward mid-decade redistricting. Reuters reports that Republicans have built a net advantage of about four House seats across nine states so far, with outcomes in Louisiana, South Carolina, and Alabama still pending and litigation in Virginia, Florida, and Missouri still capable of changing the picture.

Supporting reports

• California Department of Insurance files enforcement action against State Farm for mishandling wildfire claims — The California Department of Insurance (CDI) filed an enforcement action against State Farm General Insurance Company following an expedited investigation into claims handling for survivors of the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires. CDI examiners reviewed 220 claims and found violations in more than half (114 claims), including slow investigations, underpayment, multiple reassignments of adjusters, lack of standards for prompt processing, and delayed communication. CDI is seeking authority to suspend State Farm's license in California for up to one year, preventing new policy issuance. State Farm faces potential penalties of $2 million or more.
• California Department of Insurance enforces against State Farm for wildfire claims mishandling — The California Department of Insurance announced a major enforcement action against State Farm General Insurance Company following an expedited investigation that uncovered significant mishandling of insurance claims filed by survivors of the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires. The action represents regulatory intervention in response to the company's failure to properly process claims for disaster victims.

Supporting reports

• CIA delivers confidential analysis contradicting Trump's Iran war claims — The Central Intelligence Agency delivered a confidential analysis of conditions in Iran that contradicts the Trump administration's public statements about the war. While Trump has claimed the war was an overwhelming military victory and that Iran's economy is "crashing" with only 18–19% of its former missile stocks remaining, the CIA assessment concludes Iran can survive for three to four more months before severe economic hardship and still possesses approximately 75% of its mobile missile launchers and 70% of its missiles.
• CIA analysis contradicts Trump and Hegseth claims about Iran's economic vulnerability — A confidential CIA analysis delivered to policymakers this week concludes that Iran can survive the U.S. naval blockade for at least 3 to 4 months before facing more severe economic hardship. This finding contradicts statements by Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth hailing an imminent Iranian collapse. U.S. intelligence also indicates that Iran retains approximately 75% of its pre-war inventories of mobile launchers and about 70% of its pre-war stockpiles of missiles. The regime has recovered underground storage facilities and repaired damaged missiles. One U.S. official assessed that Iran's capacity to sustain prolonged economic hardship is far greater than the current CIA estimate.
• CIA Leaks Assessment Contradicting Trump's Claims on Iran — The CIA has leaked an assessment that contradicts former President Trump's claims regarding Iran. The assessment reportedly undermines Trump's narrative about Iran's activities and intentions, presenting a different picture than what he has publicly stated. This leak adds to the ongoing scrutiny of Trump's foreign policy decisions and statements during his presidency.
• CIA assessment contradicts Trump's Iran claims — Trump's own CIA leaked a classified assessment that contradicts statements the President has made about Iran. The leak represents a significant breach of internal intelligence consensus and public messaging alignment, with the agency's findings at odds with the administration's public position on Iran policy.

Supporting reports

• Department of Justice closes San Francisco immigration court, relocates cases to Concord — The Department of Justice shuttered the major immigration court at 100 Montgomery Street in San Francisco, effective January 2027, relocating the majority of its caseload 35 miles away to Concord. The EOIR justified the closure as "cost effective." The decision follows the Trump administration's removal of 20 of the court's 22 judges over the past year. Legal experts warn the Concord facility, which recently lost six judges, lacks capacity to absorb San Francisco's 120,000 pending cases, potentially extending case resolution timelines by years and creating administrative chaos.

Supporting reports

• US Supreme Court expedites Voting Rights Act ruling to allow Louisiana congressional map redraw before midterms — The US Supreme Court accelerated its judgment in a case striking down Louisiana's congressional map and gutting Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, allowing the ruling to take effect immediately rather than after the standard 32-day waiting period. The expedited ruling came at Louisiana's request and provides legal cover for the state's decision to cancel its May 16 primary election and redraw maps before the general election in six months. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented sharply, arguing the court departed from its usual procedure and was improperly influencing the implementation of its own ruling.

Supporting reports

• Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche asked Supreme Court to intervene in E. Jean Carroll case — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that the Department of Justice would ask the Supreme Court to permit the DOJ to intervene in the defamation case brought by columnist E. Jean Carroll, who won an $83.3 million jury verdict against Trump for defamation after he falsely denied sexually assaulting her. If the Supreme Court allows the DOJ to substitute itself for Trump as defendant, the case would be dismissed because plaintiffs cannot sue the federal government for defamation. Appeals court judges had already refused to permit such a substitution.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Poe v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C. 1:26-cv-01552) — A transgender woman incarcerated in a men's facility filed suit in D.D.C. challenging a December 2, 2025 memorandum by DOJ's Bureau of Justice Assistance that suspended Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) regulations protecting transgender, intersex, and gender non-conforming incarcerated people. The plaintiff alleges she has been sexually assaulted, subjected to unwanted sexual contact, and strip-searched by male officers following removal of those protections. She contends the memorandum violates the Administrative Procedure Act by implementing a substantive rule change without notice-and-comment rulemaking and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to restore the suspended regulations.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department announces investigation into Fairfax County Commonwealth's Attorney's prosecutorial decisions — The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division announced on May 6, 2026, that it has initiated a federal investigation into Fairfax County, Virginia Commonwealth's Attorney Steve Descano, examining his office's plea bargaining, charging decisions, and sentencing policies. The department alleges the investigation will determine whether the office discriminated against U.S. citizens by offering preferential treatment to noncitizen criminal defendants. The investigation will proceed under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Safe Streets Act, and 34 U.S.C. § 12601. The department stated it has not reached conclusions and invited public submission of relevant information.

Supporting reports

• FBI launched criminal leak investigation targeting journalist Sarah Fitzpatrick — The FBI, under Director Kash Patel, launched a criminal "insider threat investigation" into who leaked information to journalist Sarah Fitzpatrick for her article on Patel. Ken Dilanian and Carol Leonnig reported that such investigations typically target government officials suspected of disclosing state secrets or classified documents, but focusing on leaks to a reporter is "highly unusual." The investigation could allow FBI agents to obtain Fitzpatrick's phone records and examine her social media contacts. FBI sources expressed concern that agents felt coerced to proceed despite knowing the investigation was improper.
• FBI executed search warrant at office of Virginia Democratic state senator — Trump's FBI executed a search warrant at the office of Virginia state Senate President Pro Tempore L. Louise Lucas, who was at the center of the state's redistricting efforts. The search targeted a Democratic lawmaker actively involved in protecting voting rights and fair redistricting. No public explanation was provided for the warrant, and the timing coincided with Republican efforts to suppress Democratic electoral gains.
• FBI launched criminal leak investigation targeting Atlantic magazine journalist — The FBI launched a criminal "insider threat" investigation focusing on journalist Sarah Fitzpatrick, who wrote an unflattering account of FBI Director Kash Patel's work habits for The Atlantic magazine last month. The investigation is unusual because it did not stem from classified information disclosure and is focused on leaks to a reporter. Fitzpatrick's story cited two dozen anonymous sources reporting that Patel's alcohol consumption and erratic behavior had caused concern among FBI officials. The investigation could enable FBI agents to obtain her phone records, search her name through FBI databases, and examine her social media contacts.
• FBI launched criminal probe into Atlantic reporter's sources — The FBI launched a highly unusual criminal probe into leaks to a reporter from The Atlantic in relation to an article she wrote about FBI Director Kash Patel's drinking habits and unexplained absences, which Patel sued the outlet over last month. An FBI spokesperson denied the investigation exists and claimed reporting about it was "completely false." The probe targets a journalist's sources and reporting on a federal official.

Supporting reports

• Tom Homan announced mass deportations and increased ICE deployment — At the Border Security Expo in Phoenix, Arizona, Trump's White House advisor on border security Tom Homan told Republicans that mass deportations are imminent and that the administration will deploy additional immigration officers to jurisdictions that are not cooperative. Homan stated: "You ain't seen sh*t yet. This year will be a good year. Mass deportations are coming" and promised more ICE agents than ever before.

Supporting reports

• Federal prosecutor issues subpoena for Fulton County poll worker contact information — Dan Bishop, interim US attorney for North Carolina's middle district, issued a subpoena in April 2026 demanding Fulton County provide rosters of 2020 election workers including names, positions, residential addresses, email addresses, and personal phone numbers. Fulton County filed a motion to quash the subpoena in Georgia federal court, arguing it constitutes politically motivated harassment, exceeds the statute of limitations, and will chill election worker participation. The subpoena directs submission to Bishop's office rather than a grand jury, bypassing standard legal protections.

Supporting reports

• EPA extends postponement of TCE regulatory provisions pending judicial review — The Environmental Protection Agency issued a notice extending the postponement of effectiveness for conditions imposed on trichloroethylene (TCE) uses granted TSCA section 6(g) exemptions under a final rule issued December 17, 2024. The postponement, originally set to expire May 18, 2026, is now extended indefinitely until conclusion of judicial review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. This marks the sixth extension since the rule's initial January 2025 effective date, following multiple industry petitions for stay and ongoing litigation.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Espinoza v. Blanche (N.D. Ill.) — Carla Espinoza, a former immigration judge in the Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review, filed suit in the Northern District of Illinois alleging that the DOJ terminated her employment in July 2025 without cause after declining to convert her probationary appointment to permanent status. Espinoza claims the termination violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by targeting her on the basis of sex, race, national origin, and association with Latin American and Hispanic immigrants, and violated the First Amendment by punishing her prior association with organizations whose ideologies conflicted with the current administration. She seeks back pay, reinstatement, compensatory damages, and declaratory relief.

Supporting reports

• Tennessee Republicans call special legislative session to redraw congressional maps targeting Memphis-based 9th District — Governor Bill Lee called a special legislative session beginning May 5, 2026, to review Tennessee's congressional map, specifically targeting the 9th Congressional District—the state's only Democratic-held U.S. House seat centered in majority-Black Memphis. Tennessee lawmakers are considering legislation to remove the state's existing prohibition on changing congressional districts between apportionments, enabling mid-decade redistricting. The session was scheduled with compressed timelines; key committee meetings occurred on May 6 with Republican leadership rejecting Democratic requests for extended public feedback or 72-hour advance map release.

Supporting reports

• Senate budget bill appropriated $72 billion for ICE and CBP through 2029 — The Senate's proposed budget reconciliation bill appropriates $72 billion to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection through 2029. This extended funding eliminates the ability of Democrats to use annual appropriations as leverage to demand reforms to ICE and Border Patrol following documented abuses, including the shooting deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.

Supporting reports

• Trump's EEOC sued the New York Times over hiring practices — Trump's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the New York Times, alleging the publication engaged in "unlawful employment practices" and discriminated against a white man after he was passed over for a promotion, claiming the decision was influenced by the paper's "stated race and sex-based representation goals." A Times spokesperson called the allegations "politically motivated." The litigation follows Trump's $15 billion lawsuit against the Times and its reporters last fall.

Supporting reports

• Andrea Pedro-Francisco denied adequate medical care for ovarian cyst while in ICE detention — Andrea Pedro-Francisco, an asylum seeker from Guatemala, was detained by ICE on February 5, 2026, and sent to El Paso Service Processing Center. According to Amnesty International, she had a large ovarian cyst and was scheduled for surgery on February 11, but since being placed in detention "she has not received adequate medical care." There are indications that the cyst has grown considerably and Pedro-Francisco "is experiencing severe abdominal and lower back pain." Her case documents denial of necessary surgical care during the medical reimbursement freeze.
• Detainee death rate in ICE custody increased more than fivefold after medical reimbursement termination — From 2018 to 2024, the average annual death rate in ICE custody was 8.9 people. In 2025, 33 people died in ICE custody, including 12 after medical reimbursements stopped on October 3. In the first four months of 2026, 18 people died in ICE custody. Since the reimbursement termination, the annualized death rate is 51.7 people—more than five times the historical average. While the detainee population increased from 40,000 to 60,000 under Trump, even adjusting for population growth, the current death rate far exceeds historical norms. Most deaths were attributable to medical conditions rather than violent incidents.
• ICE detainee denied CT scan for chest lump despite court filing alleging systematic denial of care — Hayam El Gamal, detained at Dilly Immigration Processing Center in Texas, was refused a CT scan by center officials for a lump in her chest. According to an April 15, 2026, federal court filing, El Gamal, a mother of five, "has been pleading for medical attention for the abnormal growth, which has caused severe pain, since February 15." The court filing alleges that ICE is "systematically denying Ms. El Gamal medical care" and that the denial "poses an urgent threat to Ms. El Gamal's health and potentially her life." Her case exemplifies the pattern of medical care denial during the reimbursement freeze.
• ICE detainee with appendicitis told to take Tylenol and return in three days — On January 27, 2026, attorney Eric Lee reported that at Dilly Immigration Processing Center in Texas, one of his clients with appendicitis "collapsed in the hallway, was vomiting from pain, and the officials told him, take a Tylenol and come back in three days." The case documents ICE staff's failure to provide appropriate emergency medical care for a serious surgical condition during the period when medical reimbursements had been terminated.
• North Lake Processing Center detainees denied necessary medical care for chronic conditions — An April 13, 2026, report in The Detroit News documented that detainees at North Lake Processing Center in Michigan, which holds approximately 1,500 people, are not receiving necessary medical care. Ruth Pujols Beltre, a detainee with a history of cardiovascular issues, reported having swollen legs, tingling in her hands, and trouble breathing, but was only offered over-the-counter pain relievers. Ruby Robinson, managing attorney at the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, reported that one client detained at the facility "wasn't receiving any care for a festering wound that remained after an amputation as a result of diabetes." These cases document systematic denial of care for serious chronic conditions.

Supporting reports

• White House issues release celebrating small business policies during National Small Business Week — The White House issued a release on May 4, 2026, marking National Small Business Week and highlighting what it characterizes as a "revival" of small business under the Trump Administration. The release states the administration has signed tax relief legislation, launched a deregulation strike force claiming to eliminate $110 billion in regulatory costs, delivered record SBA lending ($45 billion in 7(a) and 504 loans to 85,000+ businesses), created a manufacturing loan program, suspended BOI reporting enforcement, implemented citizenship verification for SBA loan applicants, relocated SBA offices out of sanctuary cities, and terminated the "Joint Employer Rule." The release attributes increased hiring, investment, and small business optimism to these actions.

Supporting reports

• Senate Republicans advance $72 billion reconciliation package for immigration enforcement and White House security — Senate Republicans released text of a $72 billion reconciliation package on May 4, 2026, that includes $30.7 billion for ICE, $3.5 billion for CBP immigration enforcement, and $32.5 billion for additional DHS programs. The package also includes $1 billion for Secret Service "security adjustments and upgrades" connected to the White House ballroom modernization project. Committee markups are scheduled for the week of May 19. Republicans are using reconciliation to bypass the 60-vote threshold, allowing passage with 51 votes, after Democrats refused to fund ICE and CBP without reforms.
• Senate Republicans released budget reconciliation bill including $1 billion for White House ballroom — Senate Republicans released their funding request for a budget reconciliation bill that includes $1 billion in taxpayer money for a secure ballroom at the White House. Trump had begun demolishing the East Wing on October 20, 2025, initially claiming he and private donors would fund the ballroom entirely. The measure uses budget reconciliation, which cannot be filibustered and requires no Democratic votes to pass the Senate.
• Senate Republicans included $1 billion for Trump's ballroom in DHS funding bill — Senate Republicans released the text of a bill to fund the Department of Homeland Security that included $1 billion in taxpayer money designated for the "East Wing Modernization Project, including above-ground and below-ground security features" at Trump's property. The bill also allocated $3.4 billion for CBP through 2029 and $30 billion for ICE. Senate GOP leaders planned to bring the reconciliation bill to the floor the week of May 18.
• Senate Republicans propose $1bn funding package for White House security tied to Trump ballroom project — Senator Chuck Grassley released a Republican-led immigration enforcement funding bill that includes $1bn in proposed appropriations for "security adjustments and upgrades" within the White House compound perimeter, explicitly tied to the "East Wing Modernization Project"—the Trump administration's plan to rebuild the East Wing as a ballroom. The measure restricts funds to security elements only, though Democrats argue it effectively subsidizes the ballroom construction. The proposal comes after an armed man attempted to storm the White House Correspondents' Association dinner in April.
• Senate Republicans propose $1 billion for Trump's ballroom — Senate Republicans released a funding request for a budget reconciliation bill that includes $1 billion for White House security, specifically for a ballroom proposed by former President Donald Trump. This funding is being advanced through budget reconciliation, allowing it to pass without Democratic votes. The proposal follows Trump's earlier claims that he would fund the ballroom himself, raising concerns about the use of taxpayer money for personal projects.
• House and Senate Republicans raised concerns about $1 billion ballroom funding — Multiple House and Senate Republicans privately raised alarms about a $1 billion allocation in the GOP's reconciliation bill designated for ballroom-related construction. Republican members expressed concern about the political vulnerability of the vote, with one House member stating "A first-year political science major would know not to ask members to take this vote" and another declaring "There is no way in hell that this will get 218 votes on the floor." Senate Democrats prepared to use the vote-a-rama process to highlight the funding as an example of GOP priorities misaligned with cost-of-living concerns.

Supporting reports

• Mifepristone manufacturer files emergency Supreme Court motion — Following the Fifth Circuit's May 1 order restricting mifepristone nationwide, a manufacturer of the medication filed an emergency motion at the U.S. Supreme Court on or before May 4, 2026, asking the Court to block the Fifth Circuit's decision. The motion seeks to preserve access to the medication pending further judicial review.
• Supreme Court administratively stayed Fifth Circuit mifepristone order pending further review — On May 4, the Supreme Court issued an administrative stay of the Fifth Circuit's May 1 order, temporarily blocking the restriction from taking effect while the Court considers emergency appeals from mifepristone manufacturers. Justice Samuel Alito's order allowed telehealth, mail, and pharmacy access to continue under the FDA's 2023 rules. The stay was temporary, lasting until 5 p.m. EDT on May 11, while the Court decided whether to block the Fifth Circuit's ruling for a longer period. The Supreme Court did not rule on the merits but preserved the status quo pending further consideration.
• Supreme Court temporarily restores mifepristone mail access via emergency stay — On Monday, Justice Samuel Alito signed an emergency order pausing a Fifth Circuit ruling issued Friday that had prohibited abortion providers from prescribing mifepristone (an abortion pill used in nearly two-thirds of US terminations) through the mail. The stay, requested by manufacturer Danco Laboratories, remains in effect until at least May 11, 2026. Louisiana's government had sued the FDA arguing mail distribution ignored health risks and circumvented state abortion bans. The order temporarily restores nationwide access pending further briefing.
• US Supreme Court temporarily extends mail-order mifepristone access via emergency stay — The US Supreme Court, through Justice Samuel Alito, extended a temporary stay on May 4 to continue nationwide mail-order access to mifepristone (an abortion medication) until at least May 14. The Fifth Circuit had ordered a ban on mailing the drug on May 1 in response to Louisiana's lawsuit challenging FDA rules permitting remote dispensation. The case, Louisiana v FDA, argues that mail-order mifepristone circumvents Louisiana's abortion ban and violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Comstock Act. The stay preserves access while the Court considers next steps.
• Case update — Louisiana v. FDA (W.D. La.) 6:25-cv-01491 — The Supreme Court administratively stayed the Fifth Circuit's decision until May 11, 2026, temporarily restoring access to online and mail-order mifepristone.
• Supreme Court temporarily restores telehealth access to abortion pill mifepristone — The Supreme Court issued a temporary order restoring access to the abortion pill mifepristone via telehealth. The ruling reverses or suspends a prior restriction on remote dispensing of the medication, allowing patients to obtain the drug through telehealth channels pending further proceedings.
• SCOTUS stays Fifth Circuit order in Danco Laboratories v. Louisiana — The Supreme Court issued an administrative stay of a May 1, 2026 Fifth Circuit order in Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Louisiana (5th Cir. No. 26-30203) pending further briefing. The stay remains in effect until 5 p.m. EDT on Monday, May 11, 2026. The respondent was ordered to file a response by Thursday, May 7, 2026 at 5 p.m. EDT. The order was signed by Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
• SCOTUS stays Fifth Circuit order in GenBioPro v. Louisiana — The Supreme Court issued an administrative stay of a May 1, 2026 Fifth Circuit order in GenBioPro, Inc. v. Louisiana (No. 25A1208, Fifth Circuit No. 26-30203), effective until 5 p.m. EDT on Monday, May 11, 2026. The Court ordered respondents to file a response by Thursday, May 7, 2026, at 5 p.m. EDT. Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. signed the order on May 4, 2026.
• Supreme Court temporarily paused Fifth Circuit mifepristone restriction — The Supreme Court issued an administrative stay temporarily restoring access to mifepristone by mail, telehealth, and pharmacies while considering emergency requests from drug manufacturers. The stay expires Monday, May 11, at 5 p.m. ET unless extended. Mifepristone, used with misoprostol, is FDA-approved to end intrauterine pregnancy through ten weeks gestation. The pause does not resolve the underlying threat to access.
• Supreme Court mifepristone stay expires May 11 — The Supreme Court's temporary stay restoring mifepristone access by mail expires on Monday, May 11, at 5 p.m. ET. Louisiana filed a brief arguing the Court should let the 5th Circuit's restrictions take effect. The Trump administration opposed Louisiana's challenge and argued Louisiana lacked standing, while citing an ongoing FDA safety review. A coalition of 22 states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief urging the Court to keep the stay in place. Justice Alito's decision on whether to extend the stay, let it expire, or refer it to the full Court will determine whether telehealth access to abortion care continues or shuts down nationally.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Conservation Law Foundation v. Trump (D.D.C. 1:26-cv-01528) — Conservation Law Foundation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for Biological Diversity, and marine mammal consultant R. Zack Klyver filed a complaint challenging President Trump's February 6, 2026 Proclamation No. 11009 revoking the commercial fishing prohibition within the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument and the National Marine Fisheries Service's April 6, 2026 final rule rescinding the ban. Plaintiffs allege the proclamation exceeds presidential authority under the Antiquities Act, violates separation of powers, and that the NMFS rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act and National Environmental Policy Act. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the proclamation is unlawful, the rule arbitrary and contrary to law, vacation of the rule, and a permanent injunction restoring the commercial fishing prohibition.