Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Trump directs ICE to resume vehicle stops within 24 hours — Within 24 hours of Homan's announcement of a temporary suspension of ICE vehicle stops, President Donald Trump directed federal immigration agents to resume them. The rapid reversal undercut the agency's stated intention to review procedures following the two fatal shootings.
• White House overturns DHS halt to ICE traffic stops after two fatal shootings — The White House reversed a one-day-old Department of Homeland Security memo halting ICE traffic stops following the fatal shootings of two unarmed men—Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston on July 7 and Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Maine on July 14. Both men were shot by federal officers without body cameras and were not the intended targets. President Trump, via Truth Social, insisted ICE continue traffic stops, framing the DHS pause as capitulation to criminals and crediting ICE with crime reduction. DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin subsequently aligned with Trump's position, announcing deportation enforcement and a $2,600 payment offer to undocumented immigrants to leave voluntarily.
• Trump overruled ICE vehicle-stop suspension order — President Trump overruled his own administration's order suspending most ICE vehicle stops after receiving intense pushback from his MAGA base. White House officials reported Trump heard complaints from hard-line allies including MAGA influencer Tomi Lahren, former Border Patrol official Greg Bovino, and podcaster Steve Bannon. Trump concluded that ICE abandoning traffic stops would "make them all look weak," and reversed the policy based on cable-news segments he watched.
• Trump directed ICE to continue traffic stops despite deaths — At 6:45 a.m. on July 16, Trump issued a statement insisting that ICE agents continue traffic stops as a "Crime Fighting tool," overriding an ICE memo issued the previous day that had ordered agents to prioritize tactics other than traffic stops. The directive came after two immigrants were killed in separate ICE operations six days apart, neither of whom was the intended target. Trump's statement falsely characterized undocumented immigrants as "Criminals" and rejected calls from Senator Susan Collins and others to cease non-urgent vehicle stops.

Supporting reports

• US District Judge Kathleen Williams voided DOJ's $1.776 billion settlement with Trump — US District Judge Kathleen Williams voided the Department of Justice's $1.776 billion settlement with Trump, finding the litigation constitutionally defective under Article III because Trump, as head of the Executive Branch, controlled both the plaintiff and defendant agencies (Treasury and IRS), making them never genuinely adverse. The judge found no actual case or controversy occurred, no meaningful litigation preceded the settlement, and government lawyers never filed a response or defended the agencies. Williams imposed Rule 11 sanctions and referred one of Trump's attorneys for possible professional discipline.
• Federal Judge Voids Trump's $1.8 Billion IRS Settlement — A federal judge voided Trump's $1.8 billion settlement with the IRS that included an "anti-weaponization fund" and immunity from tax audits, ruling that the president's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS was filed "to manipulate the judicial process." The judge sanctioned two of Trump's personal attorneys, banning one from practicing in the Southern District of Florida for at least one year, and suggested that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and associate Attorney General Stan Woodward could face state bar investigations.
• Federal judge nullifies Trump tax-return settlement and sanctions president's lawyers — US District Judge Kathleen Williams in the Southern District of Florida voided a settlement agreement between the Trump administration and the president over a $10 billion lawsuit regarding leaked tax returns. The judge found the lawsuit was filed in bad faith and the settlement was collusive, designed to confer immunity on Trump and his family and create an $1.8 billion slush fund. Williams sanctioned Trump's lawyers, referred two to bar disciplinary proceedings, and blocked one from practicing in the district for one year.
• Federal judge ruled Trump's IRS lawsuit settlement was improper and manufactured — U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams for the Southern District of Florida ruled that Trump, his lawyers, and Department of Justice lawyers had manufactured a fraudulent settlement of Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service. Williams found the lawsuit was brought "for an improper purpose—to gain the imprimatur of judicial legitimacy for a 'settlement' that had no viable basis in law or fact." The settlement was designed to establish a $1.776 billion slush fund for Trump loyalists and to grant Trump, his family, businesses, and associates immunity from prosecution for any tax crimes revealed by audits of tax returns filed before May 19, 2026.
• Federal judge rules against Trump's IRS lawsuit — On July 13, 2026, U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams ruled that Trump and his legal team improperly manufactured a settlement in his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, which aimed to create a slush fund for Trump loyalists and grant immunity from prosecution for tax crimes. The judge found the lawsuit lacked a legitimate basis and recommended sanctions against some lawyers involved.
• Judge Williams recommended sanctions against lawyers involved in fraudulent settlement — Judge Kathleen Williams recommended legal sanctions against some of the lawyers involved in the fraudulent IRS settlement and expressed that she was "extremely troubled" by the testimony of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, which she characterized as "at best, misleading and, at worst, disingenuous."
• E. Jean Carroll Receives Payment from Trump — E. Jean Carroll has received a $5.6 million payment from Donald Trump, confirmed by a court filing. This payment is part of a legal settlement related to a defamation case brought by Carroll against Trump.

Supporting reports

• Trump ties foreign surveillance law renewal to voting restrictions bill — President Trump linked renewal of a key foreign surveillance law—which expired in June after a compromise extension failed—to passage of the Save America Act, his voting restrictions measure. A compromise extension was voted down after Democrats objected to Trump's appointment of an inexperienced loyalist as acting director of national intelligence. Trump subsequently nominated US attorney Jay Clayton as permanent director but scuttled his confirmation hearing and conditioned surveillance law renewal on Save America passage.
• Trump Discusses Graham's Support for Voter Suppression Act — Following Graham's death, Trump stated that Graham was actively pushing for the SAVE America Act, a voter suppression initiative. Trump expressed confidence in getting the act passed, highlighting its importance to his agenda.

Supporting reports

• Trump ousts three members of independent election administration commission — President Trump removed three members from an independent federal commission that works with states on administering elections. The removal occurred last week and sparked concern among Democrats about election integrity ahead of the November midterms. Senate Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat Mark Warner characterized the action as an attempt to "rig" the upcoming elections and called for Republican opposition to Trump's dismantling of election administration processes.

Supporting reports

• 21st Century Road to Housing Act becomes law without Trump's signature — The 21st Century Road to Housing Act, a major bipartisan housing reform bill approved by Congress with large margins, automatically became law on July 11 after President Trump refused to sign it. Trump tied his refusal to sign to passage of the Save America Act, a voting-restriction bill that lacks Senate support. The housing bill became law under the constitutional 10-day pocket-veto rule without requiring Trump's signature or veto.
• Trump refuses to sign bipartisan housing bill over voting restrictions demand — President Trump refused to sign a bipartisan housing bill supported by both parties, sending it into effect without his signature on Saturday. His refusal was in protest of Congress's lack of progress on the Save America Act, which would ban mail-in ballots and impose new voting rules nationwide. The act has passed the House three times but faces Senate opposition from Democrats and some Republicans. Trump tied renewal of a foreign surveillance law to passage of the voting restrictions measure.

Supporting reports

• Trump demands Supreme Court rehear birthright citizenship case — One week after the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionally protected right of birthright citizenship, President Trump announced on July 8, 2026, that he would "IMMEDIATELY" ask the Supreme Court to rehear the case, calling the ruling "wrong" and an "absolutely insane decision." The last Supreme Court rehearing occurred more than 50 years ago and requires a majority of the court to approve. Trump's demand to relitigate a recently decided constitutional question signals intent to overturn established citizenship protections.
• Trump requests Supreme Court rehearing on birthright citizenship ruling — President Trump announced he would petition the US Supreme Court to reconsider its recent ruling upholding birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment. Trump cited as evidence a Texas hospital's marketing of maternity services to expectant mothers in Mexico, claiming widespread "birth tourism" promotion. The Supreme Court had rejected Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship last month. Trump's request comes after a Fox News report on two billboards placed by Mission Regional Medical Center in Texas and Mexico advertising delivery packages starting at $4,000.

Supporting reports

• US Supreme Court rules president can fire independent agency heads at will — On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Trump in a case brought by former Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, who was fired in March. The court overturned a 90-year-old precedent by holding that the president has the right to remove the head of any federal government agency at will. The decision, justified through the unitary executive theory, grants the president sole total control over the executive branch and opens the door to what critics call an "imperial presidency."

Supporting reports

• Trump threatened to prosecute gas stations over prices — Trump issued a public threat against gasoline retailers, demanding they immediately lower prices to around $2.50 per gallon and warning of "big problems" if they do not comply, characterizing price maintenance as illegal "gauging."

Supporting reports

• National Design Studio builds copy of Login.gov federal sign-in gateway — The NDS built and operates a copy of Login.gov, the federal sign-in gateway used by more than 150 million Americans to access services from Social Security to tax filing. A former Doge engineer, Greg Hogan, was reportedly put in charge of the NDS's Login.gov version. The studio's voter-registration system uses this copied Login.gov to verify visitor identities. The General Services Administration (GSA), which operates the official Login.gov, stated that all personnel supporting Login.gov must comply with GSA policies and governance processes.
• National Design Studio builds passport-application portal outside State Department — The NDS built and operates passports.gov, a federal passport-application website now run from inside the White House rather than through the State Department's existing travel.state.gov portal. The studio's version collects identity information from passport applicants, carries no privacy notice, and had developer test code left running on the live page. The State Department confirmed it is "working closely with the White House" on the initiative but deferred additional questions to the White House.
• National Design Studio operates children's investment program website outside Treasury Department oversight — The NDS operates trumpaccounts.gov, the federal website for a children's investment program created in summer 2025 tax legislation. Although the Treasury Department is the registrant of record and administers the program, the website runs through the same White House-controlled commercial account as other NDS sites. The Treasury Department did not respond to requests for comment. The site collects sensitive financial and identity information from families enrolling children in the program.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court strikes down 91-year-old precedent, grants president unlimited removal power over independent agencies — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in Slaughter v. Trump that federal law restricting the president's ability to fire members of independent executive agencies (including the FTC) violates the constitutional separation of powers. The decision overruled Humphrey's Executor v. U.S., a 91-year-old precedent, and endorsed the "unitary executive" theory, granting the president sweeping authority over approximately two dozen multi-member agencies Congress intended to be independent.
• Supreme Court rules in Trump v. Slaughter to expand presidential removal power over independent agencies — On June 29, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in Trump v. Slaughter that the president has broad authority to remove members of independent federal agencies, effectively overturning the 91-year-old Humphrey's Executor precedent. The decision arose from Trump's March 2025 firing of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Fired officials and legal experts warn the ruling eliminates civil service protections, enabling politicization, corruption, and pay-to-play dynamics in federal agencies designed to operate independently.
• US Supreme Court rules Trump can fire independent agency leaders, overturning 90-year precedent — The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Trump v. Slaughter that the president can fire leaders of independent agencies without cause, overturning the 1935 Humphrey's Executor precedent. The case centered on Trump's March 2025 firing of Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Slaughter via email. The ruling affects approximately two dozen agencies with multi-member bipartisan boards, including the FTC, NLRB, and Federal Reserve. Justices Sotomayor, Jackson, and Kagan dissented, arguing the decision grants the president unconstitutional power and defies centuries of political practice and congressional authority.
• Supreme Court rules president has unrestricted power to remove independent agency officials — The Supreme Court decided Slaughter v. Trump in a 6–3 decision, holding that the president has complete authority to remove officers from independent agencies established by Congress without cause. The case arose when Trump fired Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic FTC commissioner, claiming her service conflicted with his administration's priorities. The majority rejected 90 years of precedent requiring removal only for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance." Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented, arguing the ruling grants the president power exceeding even the English Crown and undermines centuries of bipartisan practice protecting nonpartisan expertise in agencies like the FTC, EPA, SEC, and others.
• Supreme Court Affirms Federal Reserve Independence — The Supreme Court ruled in favor of maintaining the independence of the Federal Reserve, rejecting challenges that could have subjected the institution to increased political influence. This decision preserves the Fed's ability to operate without direct political pressure, which is crucial for maintaining economic stability and policy effectiveness.
• Supreme Court Decision Weakens Independent Agencies — The Supreme Court delivered a ruling that significantly weakens the authority of certain independent federal agencies. This decision could lead to increased political influence over these agencies, potentially affecting their ability to function autonomously and effectively.
• Supreme Court allows Trump to fire FTC commissioner and overturns major restraint on presidential power — The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump has the authority to fire the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) commissioner, effectively overturning a significant limitation on presidential power. This decision marks a shift in the balance of power between the executive branch and independent federal agencies, potentially increasing presidential control over such agencies. The ruling could have far-reaching implications for the independence of federal regulatory bodies and the separation of powers within the U.S. government.
• Supreme Court Overturns 90-Year-Old Independent Agency Protections — The Supreme Court overturned a 90-year-old precedent protecting members of independent agencies from being fired by the president without cause. Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned in dissent that the ruling "reshapes our government," noting that dozens of independent commissions are now likely to become purely executive agencies, shifting tremendous power over broad swaths of American life into the president's hands.
• Supreme Court Overturns Protections for Independent Agencies — The Supreme Court overturned a 90-year-old precedent that protected members of independent agencies from being fired without cause by the president. Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that this decision could transform these agencies into executive-controlled entities, concentrating power in the presidency. This ruling is seen as a significant shift in the balance of power within the U.S. government.
• Supreme Court releases opinion in Trump v. Slaughter (25-332) — The Supreme Court released an official slip opinion in Trump v. Slaughter. Docket number(s): 25-332.
• Trump claims unchecked power following Supreme Court ruling — Following the Supreme Court's decision in Slaughter v. Trump, President Trump stated that he now has the authority to remove heads of independent agencies at will, which he believes will allow him to control these agencies to serve his administration's interests. This claim raises concerns about the potential politicization of agencies that have historically operated independently of presidential influence.
• Supreme Court rules in favor of Trump in Slaughter v. Trump — On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 in favor of President Donald J. Trump in the case of Slaughter v. Trump, allowing him to fire members of independent agencies created by Congress. This decision overruled nearly 90 years of precedent that limited presidential power over such agencies, asserting that the president has complete control over executive branch officials. The dissenting justices warned that this ruling undermines the independence of agencies designed to operate free from political influence.
• US Supreme Court rules president can fire independent agency heads at will — On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Trump in a case brought by former Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, who was fired in March. The court overturned a 90-year-old precedent by holding that the president has the right to remove the head of any federal government agency at will. The decision, justified through the unitary executive theory, grants the president sole total control over the executive branch and opens the door to what critics call an "imperial presidency."

Supporting reports

• White House issues fact sheet celebrating Supreme Court TPS termination ruling and listing 60 immigration enforcement actions — The White House issued a fact sheet on June 26, 2026, announcing that the Supreme Court had upheld the Trump Administration's authority to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian migrants. The document frames this as a victory for "American sovereignty" and lists 60 actions taken as part of what it characterizes as the "largest and most aggressive immigration enforcement effort in American history," including expanded ICE workforce, accelerated deportations, border wall construction, visa restrictions, and denaturalization efforts.

Supporting reports

• Trump conditions FISA reauthorization on voting bill passage — President Trump announced he will condition the renewal of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a key intelligence tool that expired earlier this month, on passage of the Save America Act voting-restriction bill. This follows his earlier decision to block the housing bill until the voting measure passes. Democrats have refused to support FISA reauthorization in protest of Trump's appointment of inexperienced loyalist Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence, and his subsequent derailment of Jay Clayton's permanent nomination.

Supporting reports

• Trump cancels housing bill signing event — President Trump canceled a scheduled signing event for the housing bill, citing the need for Congress to pass the SAVE America Act first. This cancellation reflects his prioritization of voter eligibility legislation over housing reform, which could impact public perception and support for his administration.
• Trump threatens to withhold housing bill signature — President Trump announced he will not sign a bipartisan housing bill into law until Congress passes the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, which requires proof of citizenship to vote. This announcement came after the Senate and House passed the housing measure aimed at increasing housing supply and affordability.
• Trump withholds signature on bipartisan housing bill pending passage of voter ID legislation — After the Senate and House overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan housing affordability bill designed to increase housing supply and prevent private equity from purchasing single-family homes, Trump announced he would not sign it into law until Congress passes the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship to vote and mandates states surrender voting rolls to the federal government. Trump cancelled a scheduled housing bill signing ceremony, declaring the voter ID measure a "National Emergency."
• Trump refuses to sign housing bill pending Senate passage of voting restrictions measure — President Trump refused to sign a major housing bill that had passed with bipartisan majorities in Congress, conditioning its approval on the Senate advancing the Save America Act, a voting restrictions measure. This represents a continuation of Trump's linkage of unrelated legislative priorities, previously connecting the housing bill's passage to renewal of a foreign surveillance law. The standoff has created a legislative logjam and prompted House Republican leadership to cancel scheduled votes.
• Trump canceled bipartisan housing bill signing hours before ceremony — Roughly an hour before Trump was scheduled to sign bipartisan housing legislation on Capitol Hill alongside Republican leaders, he canceled the signing via social media post, calling the bill "of minor importance" and demanding Congress pass the SAVE Act first. The presidential seal-emblazoned table sat waiting in Statuary Hall as some top Republicans were mid-speech or press conference touting the bill, unaware the president had canceled.
• White House Press Secretary contradicted housing bill signing announcement — White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted hours before Trump's refusal to sign the housing bill, announcing that "Trump will sign into law the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, one of the most significant pieces of housing affordability legislation in American history," touting it as a bipartisan achievement and "promise made, promise kept." Trump then canceled the signing.
• Interior Department transferred taxpayer funds to Freedom 250 events — The Department of Interior transferred taxpayer money to the National Park Foundation for use in Freedom 250 events, and the National Park Service funded the Fourth of July fireworks display. Michael Scherer of The Atlantic reported this fact-check in response to Alexis Wilkins' claim that the celebration was not taxpayer-funded.
• Trump's construction projects carry over $1 billion in taxpayer costs — A New York Times analysis revealed that Trump's 18 major construction projects undertaken during his second term—including an East Wing ballroom, Kennedy Center renovations, National Garden of American Heroes, Lafayette Park, Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, and others—carry a potential cost exceeding $1 billion, with significant taxpayer expense despite Trump's claims of private funding.
• Trump demanded Senate pass SAVE Act before signing legislation — Trump announced he would not sign any additional legislation until the Senate passed the SAVE Act (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act), designed to restrict voting before the 2026 election. This conditional demand effectively halted all legislative activity and prompted House MAGA members to vote against procedural measures, leading Speaker Johnson to adjourn the House.
• Trump refused to sign bipartisan housing bill into law — President Trump declined to sign a landmark bipartisan housing bill after a midday confrontation with senators. The refusal followed Trump's demand that the Senate pass the SAVE Act to restrict voting before the 2026 election. Trump announced he would not sign any additional legislation until this voting-restriction measure advanced, effectively halting legislative activity and prompting Speaker Johnson to adjourn the House.
• House Freedom Caucus voted against procedural measures — Members of the far-right Freedom Caucus voted against procedural measures necessary for the House to conduct business, citing Trump's refusal to sign legislation as justification. Their obstruction rendered the House unable to accomplish any legislative work, prompting Speaker Johnson to adjourn members on Thursday.
• Senate Republicans voted against war powers resolution — Senate Republicans voted to reject advancing a war powers resolution that the Senate had passed the day before. The vote occurred after Trump's refusal to sign the housing bill and his confrontation with senators, appearing as an attempt to mollify the president following their brief assertion of independence.
• Trump canceled housing bill signing to leverage proof-of-citizenship voting requirement — President Trump canceled his scheduled signing of the bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act on Wednesday, June 25, stating he would not approve it until Congress passed his SAVE America Act, which includes a proof-of-citizenship voting requirement. The bill passed with overwhelming bipartisan support (85–5 in Senate, 358–32 in House). Under the ten-day pocket-veto rule, the bill becomes law without Trump's signature if Congress remains in session and he does not veto it; Speaker Johnson indicated Trump will ultimately sign.
• Rep. Luna refused to reopen House floor pending Senate return — Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) announced she would not vote to reopen the House floor until the Senate returned to Washington to act on the SAVE Act. Luna criticized Senate Majority Leader Thune for obtaining unanimous consent to adjourn, saying "Thune is running and hiding."
• Rep. Luna shut down House floor over SAVE Act demand — Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) shut down the House floor, preventing any legislation from being brought up, because the Senate had not acted on the SAVE Act. Luna froze the House despite the fact that shutting down the floor does not accomplish anything in the Senate. Speaker Mike Johnson was unable to pass a rule or bring any legislation to a vote.
• Sen. Murkowski criticized Trump's housing bill obstruction — Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) told CNN's Manu Raju that Trump's decision to hold up his own agenda by demanding action on the SAVE Act was "not helpful to him" and "not helpful to the country." She noted that "If you don't have the votes, sir, you don't have the votes" and said Trump's actions do not help chances of keeping the GOP majority, as people want Congress to focus on issues affecting them at home.
• Sen. Whitehouse warned of Republican dissension and Trump's destructive intent — Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) warned that Thune may be growing fed up with Trump and that dissension in the Republican Caucus may be growing. Whitehouse suggested that "The realization may be dawning that Trump prefers to take them all down with him than fail alone."
• Senate Majority Leader Thune adjourned Senate for 19 days — Senate Majority Leader John Thune obtained unanimous consent to adjourn the Senate for 19 days after Trump's last-minute cancellation of the housing bill signing. Thune declined to comment on Trump's reversal, saying "I guess I would say at this point I don't have any observations."

Supporting reports

• Trump berated Republican senators over war powers resolution vote — President Trump confronted Senators Bill Cassidy and three other Republicans at a Capitol Hill lunch, berating them for voting in favor of a war powers resolution that symbolically rebuked the White House's handling of the Iran war. Cassidy described the encounter as heated, stating he "raised [his] volume to match" Trump's. The confrontation centered on Trump's failure to brief Congress on the prosecution of hostilities with Iran, which Cassidy argued violated constitutional requirements for legislative oversight of military operations.
• Senate passes War Powers Resolution on Iran; Trump accuses four Republicans of disloyalty — The Senate passed a War Powers Resolution regarding Iran by a vote of 50–48. President Trump responded by accusing four Republican senators of giving "aid and comfort" to Iran, using language that echoes constitutional definitions of treason and suggesting disloyalty within his own party for voting against his position on Iran policy.
• Senate blocked binding Iran war-powers resolution after presidential pressure — On Wednesday evening, June 25, the Senate blocked a separate, binding war-powers resolution led by Senator Tim Kaine from advancing, 50–47, after the president spent the day pressuring Republicans who had voted for the non-binding measure the previous day. Trump called Senator Cassidy a "lunatic" in a closed-door lunch; by evening Cassidy voted no and Rand Paul voted present, leaving only Collins and Murkowski in support.
• Senate Republicans reject Iran war powers resolution after Trump pressure and intimidation — Senate Republicans voted 47-50-1 late Wednesday to reject a war powers resolution challenging Trump's Iran war, hours after Trump berated GOP senators at a Capitol lunch. Four Republicans, including Bill Cassidy, had voted with Democrats the previous day to block the war; Trump called them "losers" and "lunatics." Cassidy was summoned to a White House briefing by VP Vance and envoy Witkoff, then returned to vote against the measure. Rand Paul switched to "present" to give Trump negotiating space. The Senate then recessed for two weeks.
• Senate passes war powers resolution prohibiting military action against Iran — The U.S. Senate passed a war powers resolution that prohibits President Trump from conducting further military action against Iran. Trump responded by posting that the vote was "poorly timed and meaningless" and accused four Republican senators of voting with Democrats, claiming they had provided "aid and comfort to the Enemy" and made his job more difficult. The resolution reflects congressional pushback against Trump's military campaign against Iran, which strategic scholars have characterized as strategically failed.
• Cassidy and Trump engage in heated Capitol confrontation over Iran war — Republican Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana had a heated argument with President Trump at a Capitol lunch on Wednesday. The dispute arose after Trump questioned why anyone would vote for a war powers resolution that Cassidy had supported with Democrats the day prior. Cassidy, who lost his primary race after Trump endorsed a rival, stood up and demanded transparency about the Iran conflict, which Trump said would last four weeks but has stretched four months without achieving objectives. Trump raised his voice and referenced Cassidy's electoral defeat; Cassidy matched his tone before de-escalating.

Supporting reports

• Treasury issued 60-day general license waiving Iranian oil sanctions — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent issued a temporary 60-day general license authorizing the production, delivery, and sale of Iranian oil, as well as refined products and petrochemicals. The license permits U.S. refiners to import Iranian oil and pay for it in U.S. dollars, effectively restoring Iran's access to dollar transactions and allowing the country to monetize an estimated $8–9 billion in oil already at sea, plus ongoing sales and release of frozen assets.
• Treasury issues Iran sanctions waiver allowing oil sales in U.S. dollars — The U.S. Treasury Department issued a 60-day general license and sanctions waiver permitting Iran to sell oil, petrochemicals, and natural resources globally, including to the United States, using U.S. dollars for transactions. The action followed the Lake Lucerne Summit in Switzerland, where Vice President JD Vance and Jared Kushner participated in quadrilateral negotiations involving the U.S., Iran, Pakistan, and Qatar aimed at advancing a Middle East conflict resolution deal. The waiver represents a significant reversal of Trump administration sanctions policy.
• Trump administration waived sanctions on Iranian oil — The Trump administration waived sanctions on Iranian oil for the period covered by the MOU, as specified in that agreement. The waiver increases the value of Iranian oil exports and represents a significant economic concession to Iran as part of the peace agreement framework.
• Iranian oil tankers move through Strait of Hormuz — Following the Treasury Department's sanctions waiver, Iranian oil tankers began moving through the Strait of Hormuz in massive volumes, indicating immediate implementation of the newly permitted oil sales. The movement of tankers represents the practical execution of the sanctions relief announced by the U.S. government.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court allows Trump administration to end TPS protections for Haitians and Syrians — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling on Thursday allowing the Trump administration to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for hundreds of thousands of Haitians and Syrians who have lived and worked legally in the U.S. for over a decade. Justice Alito's majority opinion rejected claims that the policy was racially motivated, despite Trump's documented statements calling Haiti a "shithole country" and asserting Haitians were "poisoning the blood" of America. The decision strips legal status from approximately 350,000 Haitians and 4,000 Syrians.
• Supreme Court allowed Trump administration to end TPS for 350,000 people — The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, allowed the Trump administration to terminate temporary protected status (TPS) for more than 350,000 people from Syria and Haiti who had fled wars and violence. The six right-wing justices cited procedural reasons, though Trump loyalists interpreted the ruling as endorsement of white nationalist immigration policy.
• SCOTUS barred judicial review of TPS terminations for Haiti and Syria — The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Mullin v. Doe that federal law creating the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program bars courts from reviewing determinations by then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem to end TPS designations for Haiti and Syria. The decision removed judicial oversight of executive decisions to strip protected status from foreign nationals.
• Supreme Court Ruling in Mullin v. Doe — On June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in the consolidated cases of Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot, reversing lower court decisions and allowing the Trump administration to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Syrian and Haitian nationals. The decision was made in a 6-3 vote, with Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissenting. The majority opinion, written by Justice Alito, stated that the law governing TPS does not permit judicial review of decisions regarding the termination of TPS designations.
• Supreme Court allowed Trump to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians — The Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to remove Temporary Protected Status for approximately 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians, requiring them to leave the country or face arrest and deportation once a termination date is set. Justice Samuel Alito concluded that the TPS law authorizes Trump to end the program without court intervention. Justice Kagan dissented, arguing the majority failed to acknowledge Trump's bigoted statements and endorsed racism.
• Supreme Court cleared way to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians — In a 6–3 ideological ruling on Thursday, June 26, the Supreme Court held that the law governing Temporary Protected Status bars judicial review of the Homeland Security secretary's decision to end it. The ruling permits the administration to strip protection from more than 350,000 Haitians and several thousand Syrians who have lived and worked legally in the country for up to a decade. Justice Kagan's dissent noted the president's "repellent and racially inflected" statements about Haitians. Advocates warned the reasoning endangers roughly 1.3 million people covered by TPS designations across more than a dozen countries.
• Supreme Court strips TPS from Haitians and Syrians; allows asylum turnaround policy — The U.S. Supreme Court issued two 6-3 rulings on June 26, 2026, allowing the Trump administration to strip temporary protected status (TPS) from hundreds of thousands of Haitians and Syrians and to implement a policy permitting border officials to turn back asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border without processing claims. The decisions affect over 350,000 TPS holders and countless asylum seekers. Democratic lawmakers and immigration advocates condemned the rulings as "disastrous" and a violation of international law and federal refugee protections.
• US Supreme Court allows Trump administration to strip Temporary Protected Status from Haitians and Syrians — The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling on June 26, 2026, upholding the Trump administration's termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 350,000 Haitians and 6,100 Syrians. Justice Samuel Alito's majority opinion held that courts cannot review executive decisions on TPS revocation. The ruling overturned lower court injunctions and leaves hundreds of thousands of legally resident immigrants vulnerable to deportation despite their home countries being designated unsafe by the State Department.
• White House issues fact sheet celebrating Supreme Court TPS termination ruling and listing 60 immigration enforcement actions — The White House issued a fact sheet on June 26, 2026, announcing that the Supreme Court had upheld the Trump Administration's authority to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian migrants. The document frames this as a victory for "American sovereignty" and lists 60 actions taken as part of what it characterizes as the "largest and most aggressive immigration enforcement effort in American history," including expanded ICE workforce, accelerated deportations, border wall construction, visa restrictions, and denaturalization efforts.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court clears way for asylum seekers to be physically blocked at U.S.-Mexico border — On Thursday, the Supreme Court issued a ruling clearing the way for the Trump administration to turn away asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border by physically blocking them from setting foot on U.S. soil. The decision permits implementation of a "metering" policy instructing border officials to stand at the border line and deny entry to migrants seeking asylum, effectively circumventing statutory asylum protections.
• SCOTUS upheld asylum-seeker turnback policy at U.S.-Mexico border — The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado that the federal government's "metering" policy—systematically turning back asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border before they can enter—does not violate federal asylum law. CBP officials implement the policy by standing at the border and refusing entry to noncitizens without valid travel documents, including asylum applicants.
• Supreme Court restored asylum-denial authority at southern border — On Thursday, June 26, the Supreme Court restored the administration's authority to turn away asylum seekers at overburdened crossings on the southern border, handing the administration a second immigration win in a single day.
• Supreme Court upholds Trump asylum turn-back policy at US-Mexico border — The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the Trump administration may revive its "metering" or turn-back policy, allowing federal agents to prevent asylum seekers from physically entering US soil and claiming asylum protections. The majority, led by Justice Alito, interpreted "arrive in" narrowly to exclude migrants stopped at the border threshold. Justice Sotomayor's 35-page dissent warned the ruling would allow the government to circumvent international and domestic asylum law, potentially exposing vulnerable people to persecution or death.
• US Supreme Court upholds Trump administration asylum metering policy at US-Mexico border — On the same day, the Supreme Court issued a second 6-3 ruling, written by Justice Alito, upholding the Trump administration's authority to turn away asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border when officials deem crossings too overburdened. The decision supports the administration's revival of the "metering" policy, which had been discontinued under President Biden, allowing the government to deny asylum claims based on border capacity determinations.

Supporting reports

• Trump cancels Jay Clayton's DNI confirmation hearing — On June 17 at 3:54 a.m. Washington time, Trump posted on Truth Social from France that he was cancelling the Senate Intelligence Committee's scheduled confirmation hearing for Jay Clayton as permanent DNI, which was set to occur that day. Trump cited Democrats' alleged gamesmanship over the FISA extension and his desire to appoint a new U.S. attorney to replace Clayton. The practical effect was to ensure that Pulte would serve as acting DNI, as only two days remained before Gabbard's departure on June 19.
• Trump cancelled Senate confirmation hearing for Jay Clayton as DNI — On June 17, just hours before a Senate Intelligence Committee confirmation hearing was scheduled to begin, Trump posted that "we are cancelling the Senate Hearing RE: DNI today." This action prevented the confirmation of U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Jay Clayton, allowing William Pulte to become acting DNI instead. Clayton had been nominated after members of both parties objected to Pulte's appointment, but Trump used the cancellation to bypass the Senate confirmation process entirely.

Supporting reports

• Trump considered suspending habeas corpus to accelerate mass deportations — The New York Times reported that Trump actively considered suspending habeas corpus—the constitutional right for people to challenge their detention in court—in an effort to accelerate his mass deportation campaign early in his second term, after the Supreme Court ruled that migrants expelled under the Alien Enemies Act were entitled to challenge their deportations in court before being removed. The consideration of suspending a fundamental constitutional protection represents an extraordinary assertion of executive power.
• White House considered suspending habeas corpus for undocumented immigrants — According to reporting by Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan in the New York Times, the Trump administration came much closer to suspending the writ of habeas corpus than previously known. Last spring, after the Supreme Court said undocumented immigrants had the right to challenge their deportations, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller proposed simply suspending habeas corpus and deporting them without legal process. The Constitution permits suspension only "in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion."
• Trump administration changed immigration detention policy to circumvent habeas corpus rights — After being warned away from suspending habeas corpus, the Trump administration found an alternative: it changed longstanding policy concerning immigrants who had been in the U.S. for a long time. Previously, those caught on the border could be detained without a hearing, while those who had been here for years could request bond. The administration now treats long-term residents as if they had just arrived, throwing them into detention without a bond hearing. Judges have ruled against this new interpretation, but the administration is ignoring the rulings.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration redirects $352m in Secret Service funds to White House ballroom project — The Trump administration transferred $352 million in federal funds designated for the Secret Service toward construction of a White House ballroom, despite Trump's repeated public promises that the project would be financed entirely by private donations. The funds were drawn from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and placed into accounts labeled "Procurement, Construction, and Improvements" ($340.8m) and "Operations and Support" ($10.75m) on June 12, 2026. Congress had explicitly refused to provide $1 billion for the project. The administration justified the transfer as security-related, but senior legislators from both parties expressed skepticism.

Supporting reports

• Trump announced imminent military strikes against Iran via social media — At 8:22 a.m., Trump posted on social media that the United States would strike Iran "VERY HARD TONIGHT" and stated intentions to seize Kharg Island and control Iran's oil and gas markets. He later called Fox News to elaborate, comparing the planned action to the seizure of Venezuelan oil assets. The announcement preceded any congressional authorization, with the 60-day War Powers Act window having expired on May 1, 2026.
• Trump cancelled scheduled military strikes against Iran — Trump announced via social media that he had cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran scheduled for that evening. He stated that discussions with Iranian leadership had been brought to the highest level and approved by all parties, including the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, and others. He stated the naval blockade would remain in effect until the transaction is finalized.
• Trump stated intent to seize Iranian oil infrastructure and control oil markets — During a Fox News call, Trump elaborated on his military plans, stating his preference to "take Kharg Island" and control Iran's oil and gas markets, comparing the operation to U.S. control of Venezuelan oil. He acknowledged uncertainty about American public appetite for ground troops but expressed determination to proceed with the seizure of strategic assets.
• Trump threatened ground invasion of Iran, then claimed deal reached without evidence — President Trump began June 11 threatening a "very hard" military strike on Iran and seizure of Kharg Island and oil infrastructure. He stated on Fox & Friends that the U.S. had dropped $250 million in bombs the previous night and that Iran was "in submission." Hours later, Trump posted on social media that he had cancelled scheduled strikes after "discussions" were "approved by all parties," naming the U.S., Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt, and others. Israeli officials and Iranian state media both disputed that any agreement had been reached, with Iran's Tasnim news agency noting Trump had claimed 38 times in two months that an agreement was imminent.

Supporting reports

• Trump demands Republicans pass restrictive voting bill via budget reconciliation — President Trump posted on Truth Social demanding congressional Republicans immediately advance a $350 billion reconciliation bill that would fund defense spending and include the Save America Act, a restrictive voting measure. The Save America Act would impose new voter ID requirements, mandate states share voter rolls with the Department of Homeland Security, and create legal liability for election officials. Trump's demand splits Republicans; some senators including Mitch McConnell and Susan Collins publicly objected to using budget reconciliation for defense funding, citing fiscal instability concerns.
• Trump demanded Congress pass $350 billion military reconciliation bill — President Trump posted on social media demanding that Republicans in Congress pass a $350 billion military reconciliation bill, characterizing it as a "GENERATIONAL Investment in our Military, even bigger than President Reagan's" and stating it was "the ONLY path to the full $1.5 TRILLION DOLLAR Military Budget our Warriors need in order to build THE ARSENAL OF FREEDOM." He emphasized the bill could pass without any Democratic votes and demanded action "ASAP" with "No games, no delays, and no weak compromises."
• Trump demanded Congress pass SAVE America Act restricting voting — President Trump posted on social media demanding that Republicans in Congress pass the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote and end mail-in ballots except for illness, disability, military service, or travel. Trump framed the measure as necessary to "protect our Elections for Generations to come" and "to secure the NATION for our children and grandchildren."
• Trump demanded Republicans pass $350 billion military buildup and SAVE America Act — Trump made extreme demands that Republicans pass an additional $350 billion for his military buildup and the SAVE America Act to suppress voting. The demands were part of his effort to force Republicans to do his bidding and reflected his determination to consolidate power.
• Trump Demands Additional Military Funding and Voting Restrictions — President Trump called on Congress to approve an additional $350 billion for the military and to pass the SAVE America Act, which includes measures to require proof of citizenship for voting and restrict mail-in ballots. He emphasized the urgency of these demands in a social media post.

Supporting reports

• Trump border czar threatens surge of ICE agents to New York City in retaliation for sanctuary protections — Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, announced on Fox News that he has reviewed an operational plan to deploy "more ICE agents than you've ever seen" to New York City. Homan framed the threatened surge as retaliation for Governor Kathy Hochul signing legislation that bars state and local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities in jails. The threat comes as millions of visitors are expected in the region for the NBA finals and FIFA World Cup, and immigrant rights advocates have issued travel warnings citing risks of "arbitrary denial of entry" and deportation.

Supporting reports

• ICE refused Senator Kim access to detainees during congressional oversight visit — Senator Andy Kim visited Delaney Hall, an ICE detention center in Newark, New Jersey, to conduct congressional oversight. ICE and GEO Group, the private prison company operating the facility under federal contract, refused to allow Kim to speak with any detainees and restricted his ability to conduct his oversight duties. Kim observed a woman in apparent distress in a fetal position and reported that facility staff refused to disclose information about her condition. The facility has only one full-time doctor for hundreds of detainees.

Supporting reports

• DOJ argues courts lack authority to block White House ballroom construction — The Trump administration asked the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a lower court decision blocking construction of a $400 million ballroom and underground bunker at the White House's demolished East Wing. A DOJ lawyer argued that only Congress, not courts, has authority to halt the project, citing national security imperatives. The National Trust for Historic Preservation had sued after Trump ordered demolition without completing required environmental and historic preservation reviews. The Senate had removed $1 billion in Secret Service funding for the project from a spending bill.
• Trump's DOJ argues government can demolish Statue of Liberty without legal recourse — In an appeals court argument over White House ballroom construction, Trump's Department of Justice argued that the federal government has the right to bulldoze the Statue of Liberty and that once demolition is complete, no court would have standing to stop it or provide remedy. When Judge Millett asked if people could obtain an injunction before destruction, the DOJ answered affirmatively that nothing could be done. The DOJ also argued courts cannot stop the ballroom construction even if the administration violated the law, claiming only Congress can intervene.