Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Deputy US marshal and man shot during ICE operation in Los Angeles — During an immigration enforcement operation in south Los Angeles, ICE agents surrounded a man in his vehicle during what DHS called a "targeted traffic stop." The man allegedly rammed federal agents' vehicles to flee; officers fired "defensive shots," striking the man in the elbow. A deputy US marshal was hit in the hand by a ricochet bullet. Both were hospitalized. The man, identified as Carlitos Ricardo Parias, 44, was charged with assault on a federal officer and faces up to eight years in prison.

Supporting reports

• Banks demand U.S. government guarantee for $20 billion Argentina lending facility — Banks assembled by Treasury Secretary Bessent—including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Goldman Sachs—are demanding that the U.S. government backstop a $20 billion lending facility to Argentina, effectively requiring taxpayers to absorb losses while banks retain profits. The arrangement emerged after private lenders had ceased lending to Argentina due to its heavy debt burden and low repayment likelihood. The Treasury Department confirmed talks remain ongoing but did not dispute the Wall Street Journal's reporting of the guarantee demand.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services v. Donald Trump — Environmental non-profit organizations filed a complaint in D.D.C. challenging a July 17 Trump administration Proclamation that exempted 50 chemical manufacturing plants from Clean Air Act requirements to monitor and control emissions of hazardous air pollutants for two years. Plaintiffs allege the Proclamation is unlawful because it issues blanket exemptions without facility-, standard-, or technology-specific findings, misreads "technology" and "national security," and functions as a de facto amendment of EPA's rule. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief and an injunction prohibiting EPA implementation.

Supporting reports

• Pentagon replaces departing press corps with far-right outlets after restrictive policy implementation — After Pentagon reporters refused to sign new restrictive press policies introduced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Pentagon announced a replacement press corps of 60 journalists from far-right outlets including Lindell TV, Gateway Pundit, Post Millennial, and others. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell characterized departing mainstream journalists as "self-righteous media who chose to self-deport." Major outlets including the Washington Post, New York Times, Atlantic, Fox News, and Newsmax had all declined to accept the new rules, which restricted access to unauthorized material and certain areas.
• Pentagon announced "new media" press corps of right-wing outlets — The Pentagon announced a "new media" press corps made up of 60 people from primarily right-wing outlets including Real America's Voice, the Gateway Pundit, Lindell TV (created by MyPillow CEO and Trump ally Mike Lindell), Turning Point USA's media brand Frontlines, and Timcast, created by podcaster Tim Pool. Pool was among conservative influencers linked to a media company secretly funded by Russian state media employees, which amplified Kremlin interests.
• Pentagon establishes new press corps after traditional pool walks out over censorship demands — The Pentagon announced formation of a new press corps to cover Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the Department of Defense after the traditional press pool resigned rather than accept a requirement to publish only material approved by Pentagon officials. The departing journalists included Hegseth's former colleagues at Fox News Channel. The new press corps, composed entirely of outlets that accepted Pentagon censorship, includes LindellTV (owned by election denier Mike Lindell) and podcaster Tim Pool, who received Russian funding before the 2024 election.

Supporting reports

• Michael Wolff files defamation lawsuit against Melania Trump — Journalist Michael Wolff filed a lawsuit against Melania Trump in New York seeking declaratory judgment and damages for defamation. The lawsuit was filed after Melania allegedly threatened to sue Wolff for $1 billion over comments he made about the Trumps and Jeffrey Epstein.
• Biographer Michael Wolff sued by Melania Trump for defamation — Biographer Michael Wolff filed a lawsuit against Melania Trump after she threatened to sue him for $1 billion for statements he made on the MeidasTouch podcast and in a Daily Beast article alleging she played an extensive role in White House efforts to minimize Epstein's relationship with herself and her husband. Wolff's lawsuit characterizes Melania's threat as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) designed to silence speech and intimidate critics. Wolff stated he would welcome the opportunity to depose both Trumps under oath regarding their relationship with Epstein.

Supporting reports

• Capitol insurrectionist pardoned by Trump arrested for threatening to kill House Minority Leader — CBS News reported that a Capitol insurrectionist pardoned by Trump was arrested over the weekend for allegedly threatening to kill House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. In a court filing, the man allegedly wrote in a text message, "Hakeem Jeffries makes a speech in a few days in NYC I cannot allow this terrorist to live." The man was arraigned and pleaded not guilty. The arrest demonstrates that Trump's pardons of January 6 participants have not prevented subsequent violent threats.

Supporting reports

• New York City officials rejected federal ICE operation and reaffirmed sanctuary policy — Following the October 21 ICE raid on Canal Street, New York City officials issued statements rejecting the operation and reaffirming the city's sanctuary stance. A City Hall spokesperson stated the city "never cooperate[s] with federal law enforcement on civil deportation matters" and had no involvement. Council Member Christopher Marte, representing Chinatown, issued a public critique calling the raid "unnecessary, unacceptable, and antithetical to our city's values as a sanctuary for all people."
• ICE conducted unannounced raid on Canal Street in Manhattan's Chinatown — On October 21, 2025, federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in tactical gear conducted a surprise enforcement operation on Canal Street in Manhattan without notifying New York City officials. DHS described it as targeting counterfeit goods sales. Vendors fled; bystanders gathered to document the action. City Hall stated it had no involvement and does not cooperate with federal civil deportation enforcement. The operation broke with New York City's 36-year sanctuary policy established by Executive Order 124 in 1989.
• ICE conducts enforcement raid in Manhattan's Chinatown targeting street vendors — On Tuesday, October 21, 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conducted a raid in Manhattan's Chinatown near Canal Street, detaining several individuals and deploying military-style vehicles. DHS characterized it as a "targeted, intelligence-driven enforcement operation" focused on counterfeit goods sales. The operation drew swift condemnation from New York state and local officials, including Governor Hochul, Senator Schumer, and Mayor Adams, who criticized the use of force against street vendors and bystanders and characterized the raid as creating fear rather than safety.
• ICE conducts immigration raids targeting street vendors in New York City — Under the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, ICE has made 7,488 arrests in New York in 2025, with street vendors increasingly targeted. In late October, 14 people were detained in Manhattan's Chinatown after a conservative influencer posted about "African illegal immigrants" selling goods. A second large-scale operation in late November was thwarted when 200 protesters blocked law enforcement vehicles from leaving garages. Street vendors—96% of whom are immigrants and 27% undocumented—face heightened vulnerability to these sweeps.
• ICE raid in Manhattan's Chinatown results in detention of four U.S. citizens — Federal ICE agents conducted a large-scale raid in Manhattan's Chinatown on October 22, deploying over 50 masked and armed agents, an armored military vehicle, and riot gear targeting street vendors. Four U.S. citizens were arrested and held for nearly 24 hours without charges before being released on October 23. Congressman Dan Goldman stated the operation was a "militarized effort to incite tension" unrelated to public safety, and widespread protests erupted across New York City.
• ICE raids Chinatown on counterfeit goods charges; protests erupt; at least two arrested for protesting — Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, along with FBI, DEA, ATF, IRS-CI, and CBP, conducted a raid on Canal Street in Manhattan's Chinatown on October 22, targeting vendors selling counterfeit goods. Between 15 and 40 vendors were arrested; at least two additional people were detained for protesting and blocking ICE operations. Hundreds of demonstrators assembled at 26 Federal Plaza, chanting against ICE. Videos showed armed agents zip-tying detainees, shoving onlookers, and an armored vehicle rolling through streets. DHS claimed rioters became violent and obstructed law enforcement; one person was arrested for assault on a federal officer. Local officials, including Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul, condemned the raid's tactics and Trump administration's approach.

Supporting reports

• United States signs economic stabilization agreement with Argentina, commits $20 billion currency swap — The United States signed an "economic stabilization agreement" with Argentina's central bank, committing to swap $20 billion in currency to prop up the Argentine peso, in addition to at least two previous direct purchases of pesos. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated the government is arranging for private lenders or sovereign wealth funds to contribute another $20 billion into the Argentine economy. Banks have requested security from the United States that they will recover their money if the Argentine economy continues to decline.
• Trump Announces $40 Billion Aid to Argentina — President Trump has announced a $40 billion aid package to Argentina, intended to stabilize the country's currency. However, the move has been criticized for benefiting Trump-aligned investors while failing to address economic challenges faced by Americans. The aid has not succeeded in stabilizing Argentina's currency as intended.
• U.S. Treasury peso purchases fail to stabilize Argentine currency — The Argentine peso fell below levels reached before the U.S. Treasury began purchasing pesos earlier in October, indicating that the Trump administration's financial support has failed to halt the currency's decline ahead of crucial midterm elections for President Milei. The Treasury has made approximately three purchases totaling roughly $400 million since October 9, and a $20 billion currency swap line was announced, but the peso continued to slide.
• Trump’s $40 billion bailout of Argentina fails — Donald Trump’s $40 billion taxpayer-funded bailout of Argentina has failed, with the Argentine peso losing 10% of its value in the first two weeks of October. The economic situation in Argentina has worsened, with interest rates soaring to 157% and inflation rising. Trump's intervention has not stabilized the economy and has drained U.S. resources.
• Trump administration approves $40 billion bailout of Argentina — The Trump administration approved a $40 billion bailout of Argentina. Representative Hakeem Jeffries criticized the expenditure during a government shutdown, stating Trump had "found time to bail out a right-wing wannabe dictator in Argentina with $40b" while refusing to negotiate with Democrats on reopening the government. Senator Rand Paul also criticized the bailout as inconsistent with "America First" policy, noting the funds are borrowed and the country faces a $2 trillion deficit. The National Cattlemen's Beef Association opposed the bailout, stating it undermines family farmers and ranchers by allowing importation of Argentine beef.

Supporting reports

• Comey files motion to dismiss charges, citing selective prosecution and unlawful appointment of prosecutor — Former FBI director James Comey filed a motion in federal court requesting dismissal of criminal charges against him on two grounds: selective prosecution by a politically motivated Trump administration and the unlawful appointment of the US attorney who filed the charges. Comey's lawyers presented Trump's public statements disparaging Comey as evidence of presidential animus, noted that career prosecutors declined to bring charges, and argued the interim US attorney exceeded her 120-day authority limit. The charges relate to Comey's September 2020 congressional testimony regarding alleged unauthorized FBI leaks.

Supporting reports

• Arizona and Grijalva sue House of Representatives over refusal to swear in elected representative — The state of Arizona and representative-elect Adelita Grijalva filed suit against the House of Representatives over Speaker Johnson's refusal to swear Grijalva into office, thus depriving her Arizona constituents of representation. Arizona Attorney General Kristin Mayes argued that a duly elected representative who meets constitutional qualifications cannot be denied office simply because the Speaker has decided to keep the House out of regular session. Mayes requested the court authorize someone else to swear Grijalva into office.
• Arizona Attorney General and elected representative sue Speaker Johnson over obstruction of swearing-in — On October 21, 2025, Adelita Grijalva and Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes filed a lawsuit against the House of Representatives challenging Speaker Johnson's refusal to swear in Grijalva. The lawsuit argues that the Constitution does not authorize the Speaker to deny a duly elected representative her office to prevent her from signing a discharge petition or to strengthen the Speaker's negotiating position on budget matters. Mayes contends that Johnson "has not identified any valid reason for refusing to promptly seat Ms. Grijalva" and that the delay injures Grijalva and Arizona voters by denying representation for a significant portion of the two-year term. The lawsuit requests that if Johnson continues to delay, Grijalva be sworn in by another authorized official.
• Arizona sues Mike Johnson to block swearing-in of elected Democrat Adelita Grijalva — Arizona's Democratic attorney general Kris Mayes filed suit against House Speaker Mike Johnson to compel him to swear in Adelita Grijalva, a Democrat elected to Congress on 23 September in Arizona's seventh district. Johnson has refused to schedule her swearing-in since early October, citing the ongoing government shutdown. Grijalva cannot access her office fully or vote without being sworn in. The lawsuit alleges Johnson is denying Arizona's district representation and suspects he is blocking her to prevent her from becoming the 218th signature on a discharge petition to force a vote on releasing the Epstein files.

Supporting reports

• House Republicans referred former CIA Director John Brennan for criminal prosecution — House Republicans referred former CIA Director John Brennan to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution, accusing him of lying to Congress about the 2016 Steele dossier. In a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, the committee claimed there is "significant evidence" Brennan made "numerous willfully and intentionally false statements" while testifying about the CIA's involvement with the dossier. Brennan called the criminal referral "ludicrous" and accused House Judiciary Chair Rep. Jim Jordan of "trying to get into the action of Trump's revenge tour."

Supporting reports

• Just Security documents 35 cases of government lying to federal judges — The nonpartisan law journal Just Security discovered more than 35 cases in which judges have stated that the government is lying to them. One judge warned that "trust that had been earned over generations has been lost in weeks."

Supporting reports

• U.S. District Judge James Boasberg orders halt to migrant deportation flights — After Venezuelan migrants sued, U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg held a hearing and ordered that planes carrying migrants not leave and that any planes already in air be returned. The order was issued in response to the DOJ's plan to deport migrants without due process under the Alien Enemies Act.
• Trump administration defies federal court order on migrant deportations — More than five hours after Judge Boasberg's order halting the deportation flights, planes carrying Venezuelan migrants arrived at CECOT, a prison facility in El Salvador. The administration proceeded with the deportation despite the federal court's explicit order to halt the flights and return any planes already in air, constituting direct defiance of judicial authority.

Supporting reports

• Senate fails eleventh funding vote as government shutdown extends to historic length — The Senate voted 50–43 to reject a continuing resolution for the 11th time, maintaining a government shutdown that began October 1 and has become the longest full shutdown in U.S. history. House Speaker Mike Johnson has kept the chamber in extended recess since September 19, demanding passage of a House continuing resolution without policy additions. Democrats refuse to support the measure without provisions protecting Affordable Care Act healthcare subsidies expiring at year-end. The impasse has triggered furloughs of approximately 1,400 Department of Energy nuclear weapons maintenance personnel.

Supporting reports

• Trump offered $230 million settlement in DOJ malicious prosecution lawsuit with conflict of interest — Trump proposed settling his lawsuit against the DOJ for $230 million, claiming malicious prosecution. The DOJ supervisors tasked with approving the settlement are Trump's former lawyers, creating a direct conflict of interest. Trump stated he would need to decide how much to pay himself in damages, acknowledging the unusual nature of the arrangement.
• Trump demanded Justice Department pay him $230 million for federal investigations — The New York Times reported that Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him roughly $230 million in compensation for its federal investigations into him. The settlement could ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him. The demand represents an unprecedented attempt to use the Justice Department to extract personal financial benefit from the presidency.
• Trump demands DOJ pay $230 million for "pain and suffering" from investigations — Trump demanded that the Department of Justice pay him $230 million in taxpayer money as compensation for his "pain and suffering" from federal investigations. Trump claimed he would donate the money to charity.
• Trump demands DOJ pay him $230 million for investigations and Mar-a-Lago search — President Trump is demanding that the Department of Justice hand over approximately $230 million to compensate him for the investigation into ties between his 2016 campaign and Russian operatives and for the 2022 search of Mar-a-Lago for classified documents. Trump filed the claims in 2023 and 2024. Trump's own appointees will now decide whether American taxpayers should pay the compensation Trump is demanding. When asked about the demand, Trump stated that media outlets had paid him settlements and claimed that any money he received would be given to charity, while acknowledging the unusual nature of deciding how much to pay himself in damages.
• Trump accused of using DOJ funds for personal settlement — Trump is accused of using Department of Justice funds to pay himself a $230 million settlement, raising concerns about the misuse of government resources for personal gain.

Supporting reports

• Trump solicits corporate donations for $300m White House ballroom project — Donald Trump announced a $300m ballroom project at the White House, funded by corporate and billionaire donors including Apple, Google, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Palantir, and others. Demolition of the entire East Wing began without prior public announcement or approval from the National Capital Planning Commission. Trump initially stated the project would cost $200m but increased the figure to $300m on Wednesday. House Democrats condemned the lack of transparency and secretive decision-making process.
• Trump raised $350 million in corporate donations for White House ballroom — Trump announced he has raised $350 million from corporate donors to fund the White House ballroom renovation, up from his initial estimate of $200 million, then $250 million, then $300 million. When asked how much he personally would contribute, Trump declined to provide a specific number. The project cost estimates have escalated repeatedly.
• White House releases list of donors to Trump ballroom project — The White House released a list of major corporations and individuals donating to Trump's ballroom project intended to replace the demolished East Wing of the White House. Donors include Google (whose CEO thanked Trump for resolving an antitrust case), Palantir (which holds lucrative ICE contracts), Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Coinbase, Ripple, and numerous others. Economist Robert Reich characterized the arrangement as "pay-to-play," noting that donors include companies with direct regulatory or contractual interests in Trump administration decisions.

Supporting reports

• ICE officer drops gun and points it at bystanders — In September 2025, an ICE officer dropped his gun while making an arrest and then pointed the weapon at bystanders. The incident was captured on video and is part of a broader pattern of violent and reckless conduct by ICE personnel during enforcement operations in 2025.

Supporting reports

• ICE officer shoots pepper ball at CBS News Chicago reporter — In September 2025, an ICE officer allegedly shot a pepper ball at the vehicle of a CBS News Chicago reporter during an enforcement operation. The reporter's window was open, allowing chemical agents to enter the vehicle and cause the reporter to vomit. The incident represents an apparent targeting of press personnel documenting ICE operations.

Supporting reports

• Trump sued Wall Street Journal for $10 billion defamation over Epstein reporting — Trump's lawyers asked a federal judge to deny a request by the Wall Street Journal and its parent companies to dismiss the president's $10 billion defamation lawsuit. The lawsuit relates to the Journal's reporting of Trump's letter and drawing that appeared in Jeffrey Epstein's birthday book. Trump's lawyers called the article and coverage "a deliberate smear campaign designed to damage President Trump's reputation" and subject him to "public hatred and ridicule."

Supporting reports

• House Speaker Johnson refuses to seat elected representative Adelita Grijalva — House Speaker Mike Johnson has refused to seat representative-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ), who was elected by voters on September 23, 2025, to fill a vacant House seat. Johnson has offered successive reasons to delay her seating. Without being sworn in, Grijalva has no access to government resources, cannot represent her constituents, and cannot provide the 218th signature needed on a discharge petition to force a vote on releasing the Epstein files.
• House adjourned for 77 of last 89 days to block Epstein files release vote — Speaker Mike Johnson kept the House adjourned for 77 of the previous 89 days, with House Republicans working only 12 days in three months. The stated purpose was to prevent a vote on releasing the Epstein files. Rep. Marjorie Greene publicly disagreed with the shutdown strategy, calling for the House to return to work on appropriations and legislation.
• House Speaker Johnson refuses to call House into session, blocking swearing-in of representative-elect Grijalva — House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) is refusing to call the House into session, keeping members out of Washington and preventing the swearing-in of representative-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ), who was elected on September 23. Johnson claims that keeping the House out of session prevents him from swearing in Grijalva, though speakers have sworn in representatives during pro forma sessions in the past. Grijalva has stated she will be the 218th signature on a discharge petition to force a vote on releasing the Epstein files.
• Johnson dismisses Grijalva lawsuit as "absurd" and "publicity stunt" — House Speaker Mike Johnson responded to the Arizona lawsuit by calling it "absurd" and characterizing it as "a publicity stunt." The lawsuit had noted that Johnson's excuse for delaying Grijalva's swearing-in—that former Speaker Nancy Pelosi delayed swearing in Representative Julia Letlow—was inaccurate; Pelosi had contacted Letlow to determine when she wished to be sworn in.
• Arizona sued House Speaker Mike Johnson to compel swearing-in of Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva — Arizona sued House Speaker Mike Johnson and the U.S. House of Representatives to compel the swearing-in of Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva, who won a special election last month. Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes argued the delay violates the constitutional rights of the district's 800,000 residents to representation. Democrats said the delay is politically motivated, as seating Grijalva could give Democrats the 218th signature needed for a discharge petition to force a vote for the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents.
• Arizona and Grijalva sue House of Representatives over refusal to swear in elected representative — The state of Arizona and representative-elect Adelita Grijalva filed suit against the House of Representatives over Speaker Johnson's refusal to swear Grijalva into office, thus depriving her Arizona constituents of representation. Arizona Attorney General Kristin Mayes argued that a duly elected representative who meets constitutional qualifications cannot be denied office simply because the Speaker has decided to keep the House out of regular session. Mayes requested the court authorize someone else to swear Grijalva into office.
• Arizona Attorney General and elected representative sue Speaker Johnson over obstruction of swearing-in — On October 21, 2025, Adelita Grijalva and Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes filed a lawsuit against the House of Representatives challenging Speaker Johnson's refusal to swear in Grijalva. The lawsuit argues that the Constitution does not authorize the Speaker to deny a duly elected representative her office to prevent her from signing a discharge petition or to strengthen the Speaker's negotiating position on budget matters. Mayes contends that Johnson "has not identified any valid reason for refusing to promptly seat Ms. Grijalva" and that the delay injures Grijalva and Arizona voters by denying representation for a significant portion of the two-year term. The lawsuit requests that if Johnson continues to delay, Grijalva be sworn in by another authorized official.
• House Republican leadership claims Trump exonerated in Epstein files — House Republican leadership, represented by Rep. James Comer, claimed that evidence gathered does not implicate President Trump in any way regarding the Epstein files. Comer stated that public reporting, survivor testimony, and official documents show Bill Clinton had far closer ties to Epstein. The files remain unreleased to the public.
• Arizona sues Mike Johnson to block swearing-in of elected Democrat Adelita Grijalva — Arizona's Democratic attorney general Kris Mayes filed suit against House Speaker Mike Johnson to compel him to swear in Adelita Grijalva, a Democrat elected to Congress on 23 September in Arizona's seventh district. Johnson has refused to schedule her swearing-in since early October, citing the ongoing government shutdown. Grijalva cannot access her office fully or vote without being sworn in. The lawsuit alleges Johnson is denying Arizona's district representation and suspects he is blocking her to prevent her from becoming the 218th signature on a discharge petition to force a vote on releasing the Epstein files.
• Rep.-elect Grijalva blocked from being sworn in — Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva has been blocked from being sworn in by Speaker Mike Johnson, an unprecedented move that prevents her from voting on critical legislation.

Supporting reports

• Republican congressional leaders refuse to negotiate with Democrats on government reopening — Republican congressional leaders are refusing to engage in negotiations with Democrats to reopen the federal government, instead attempting to force Democrats to comply with Republican demands without discussion or compromise. This occurs despite 78% of Americans, including 59% of Republicans, supporting the Democratic demand for an extension of the tax credit that lowers healthcare premium costs on Affordable Care Act markets. More than three-quarters of those insured through ACA markets live in states that voted for Trump.

Supporting reports

• Stay motion decided — Oregon v. Trump (D. Or.) 3:25-cv-01756 — The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted the administration's emergency motion to stay a district court order that had blocked the federalization of 200 members of the Oregon National Guard. In a 2-1 decision, the panel concluded that the President likely lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3) , finding his decision “reflect[ed] a colorable assessment of the facts and law within a ‘range of honest judgment.'” The majority found that the district court had erred by minimizing evidence of violence in the months before the federalization order was issued and that it placed too much emphasis on Trump's social media remarks, writing that the deployment constituted a “proportionate” and “measured” response by “sending only a minimal number of Guardsmen to restore order around a federal building” and that the decision of how many troops to send “warrants the highest possible deference.” Judge Graber dissented, warning that the ruling “hands the President a blank check to militarize domestic disputes whenever he declares himself dissatisfied with civilian law enforcement.” The stay reinstates the administration's power to deploy the Oregon National Guard while the appeal proceeds.
• Federal appeals court ruled Trump administration can deploy National Guard to Portland — A federal appeals court ruled that the Trump administration can move forward with deploying National Guard troops to Portland. Two Trump-appointed judges wrote that "Even if the President may exaggerate the extent of the problem on social media, this does not change that other facts provide a colorable basis" to support the deployment. A Clinton-appointed judge dissented, writing that the decision "is not merely absurd, it erodes core constitutional principles."
• Ninth Circuit judge requests en banc rehearing vote on Trump troop deployment ruling — Hours after the three-judge panel decision, a Ninth Circuit judge formally requested a vote on whether the case should be reheard by a larger en banc panel of all 29 active judges. This triggered a formal order requiring written briefs from Oregon and Portland (supporting rehearing) and the Trump administration (opposing it) by midnight Wednesday. All 29 judges will then vote on whether to grant the rehearing. The dissenting judge, Susan Graber, had urged vacatur of the panel's decision, and Oregon's governor and attorney general both called for the full court to reverse the ruling.
• Three-judge federal appeals panel lifts block on Trump's deployment of federalized Oregon National Guard troops to Portland — A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 on October 21 to lift a lower court's injunction blocking Trump's deployment of federalized Oregon National Guard troops to Portland. Trump had ordered the deployment citing federal property protection; Oregon's governor and attorney general challenged it as unlawful. The dissenting judge called the ruling "absurd" and without legal justification. Hours later, a Ninth Circuit judge formally requested a vote on whether the full 29-judge court should rehear the case, triggering a briefing schedule with a Wednesday midnight deadline.
• Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals pauses lifting of Portland national guard block — The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday paused the lifting of Judge Immergut's first temporary restraining order blocking deployment of 200 Oregon national guard troops to Portland until the following Tuesday evening. The pause was granted to allow the court time to decide whether to rehear the appeal of that order before a larger 11-judge panel, effectively extending the deployment block for at least four additional days.
• Case update — Oregon v. Trump (D. Or.) 3:25-cv-01756 — The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals applied an administrative stay on an earlier order temporarily blocking the administration from deploying the Oregon National Guard while the legal challenge against it proceeds. The ruling temporarily reinstates the district court's order while the full court determines whether to rehear the case en banc.

Supporting reports

• Trump's interim U.S. attorney for Eastern District of Virginia leaked grand jury testimony to reporter — Lawfare reported that Trump's hand-picked interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Lindsey Halligan, engaged in a Signal exchange with reporter Anna Bower in which she divulged details about grand jury testimony in her criminal case against New York Attorney General Letitia James. Halligan later told Bower that their entire correspondence was off the record, despite the fact that such requests must be made in advance and agreed to by the reporter. The incident raised serious concerns about prosecutorial ethics and the politicization of the Justice Department.
• US Attorney Halligan's use of auto-delete Signal messages potentially violates federal records-retention laws — Lindsey Halligan, interim US attorney for the eastern district of Virginia, used Signal with auto-delete settings (eight-hour message expiration) to communicate with a journalist about her prosecution of New York Attorney General Letitia James. Watchdog groups American Oversight and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington warned that this practice potentially violates the Federal Records Act and DOJ records-retention rules. American Oversight filed a public records request for the messages; both groups called for investigation by Attorney General Pam Bondi and the DOJ Office of Inspector General.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration officials view interim U.S. attorney Halligan as unprepared and destined for defeat — Zeteo reported that numerous Trump administration officials view Lindsey Halligan, Trump's handpicked prosecutor going after his political enemies, as being in over her head, ill-prepared for her high-stakes role, and destined for a number of crushing defeats in court. One Trump-aligned federal law enforcement official called Halligan a "trainwreck" who is "going to be the most subpoenaed person" when Democrats regain control of Congress or the Justice Department.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration fired two federal prosecutors who opposed charges against Letitia James — CBS News reported that the Trump administration fired two federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia last week who opposed bringing criminal charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James. The firings appeared to be retaliation for the prosecutors' professional judgment that the case lacked sufficient evidence.