Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• US judge temporarily halts deportation of Colorado fire attack suspect’s family — On Wednesday, a federal judge in Colorado, Gordon Gallagher, issued an order temporarily blocking the deportation of the family of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, who is charged with a firebombing attack in Boulder, Colorado. The judge's decision came after Soliman's wife and five children were taken into federal custody by US immigration authorities. The court found that deportation without due process could cause irreparable harm, prompting the issuance of the order. The family, who are Egyptian nationals, are seeking asylum in the US, and their lawyers argue that punishing them for Soliman's alleged crimes is unlawful.
• Motion granted — Dvortsin as Next Friend of Hayam El Gamal et al., Petitioner, v. Noem (W.D. Tex.) 5:25-cv-00664 — Judge Gordon Gallagher granted a TRO blocking the removal of the family and requiring that they be given access to counsel. June 1 2, 2025: Judge Gallagher determined that the administration cannot expedite deportation proceedings for the family of the Egyptian man accused of fire-bombing a group of Jewish demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado. The court also ordered the case to be transferred to the Western District of Texas, where the family is being held.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Brown v. Trump — On June 4, 2025, Alvin Brown, the former vice chair of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging his removal by President Trump. Brown alleges that his removal violated the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974, which allows removal of NTSB members only for specific statutory reasons. The lawsuit seeks a declaration that the removal was unlawful and requests injunctive relief to restore Brown's access to his position and resources. The case is assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Baraka v. Habba — On June 3, Newark, New Jersey Mayor Ras Baraka filed a lawsuit in the District of New Jersey against Interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba and DHS official Ricky Patel. The complaint alleges that Baraka's arrest by DHS agents outside an ICE detention facility on May 9 violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The lawsuit claims the arrest was politically motivated and includes allegations of false arrest, malicious prosecution, and defamation. Baraka seeks compensatory and punitive damages.

Supporting reports

• Court issues order barring ICE from transferring Marcelo Gomes Da Silva
• Court issues second order regarding Marcelo Gomes Da Silva's detention

Supporting reports

• Boulder attack treated as act of terrorism — On June 1, 2025, a man identified as Mohamed Sabry Soliman allegedly threw an incendiary device into a crowd during a rally in Boulder, Colorado, injuring eight people. The rally was in support of Israeli hostages held in Gaza. The FBI is treating the incident as an act of terrorism. The attack occurred near a downtown courthouse, and the injured individuals, aged between 67 and 88, suffered burns, with some requiring hospitalization. The police are investigating the scene and have detained the suspect. The incident has heightened tensions related to the Israel-Gaza conflict in the U.S.
• FBI investigates Boulder attack as act of terrorism — The FBI is investigating an attack in Boulder, Colorado, as an act of terrorism after Mohamed Sabry Soliman allegedly used a makeshift flamethrower and incendiary devices at a rally supporting Israeli hostages. The attack, which occurred on Sunday, targeted attendees of an event organized by Run for Their Lives. Soliman has been charged with multiple felonies, and the incident is being treated as a horrific antisemitic attack. Several people were injured, and Soliman is currently in custody with a hearing scheduled. The attack has been widely condemned by political leaders across the US.
• Firebombing of rally in Boulder, Colorado — On June 2, 2025, a rally in Boulder, Colorado, in solidarity with hostages held in Gaza was attacked with a firebomb. The attacker reportedly shouted "Free Palestine" during the incident. This attack is part of a series of violent acts targeting Jewish communities and institutions, which have raised concerns about rising antisemitism and the safety of Jewish Americans. The incident has prompted Jewish institutions to reconsider their security protocols and has sparked debates about the conflation of anti-Zionism with antisemitism.
• Suspect charged with federal hate crime in Colorado rally attack

Supporting reports

• NPR and Public Radio Stations File Lawsuit Against Trump's Executive Order — NPR, along with three Colorado-based public radio stations, has filed a lawsuit challenging an executive order by President Trump that cuts federal funding to media outlets he deems "biased." The lawsuit argues that the order violates the First Amendment by targeting NPR and PBS for their news coverage, which the president considers biased. The executive order, signed on May 1, aims to strip direct and indirect funding from these public media organizations. NPR and its partners seek to have the order permanently blocked and declared unconstitutional.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court ruling on Kilmar Ábrego García deportation case — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the Trump administration, ordering it to facilitate the return of Kilmar Ábrego García, a Maryland resident who was wrongly deported to El Salvador. This decision highlights the court's role in checking executive actions, especially those perceived as overreaching or unconstitutional. The ruling is part of a broader context where the court is seen as a potential counterbalance to the Trump administration's aggressive policies.
• Federal judge orders return of Kilmar Ábrego García from El Salvador — A federal judge, Paula Xinis, ordered the Trump administration to facilitate the return of Kilmar Ábrego García from El Salvador after his deportation was deemed an administrative error. The Supreme Court upheld this order, emphasizing the need for due process in García's case. The ruling mandates that his case be handled as if he had not been improperly deported.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court allows end of immigration paroles — The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to end immigration paroles for about 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, making them undocumented and subject to deportation during ongoing litigation.
• Supreme Court Ends Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans — The U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to end immigration paroles for about 500,000 individuals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, making them undocumented and subject to deportation during ongoing litigation.
• — The US Supreme Court has decided to end the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelans, affecting approximately 25,000 individuals in North Carolina alone. This decision will require these individuals to navigate new legal challenges and potential deportation. The ruling is part of broader immigration policy changes under the current administration, which are being met with resistance from immigrant communities and advocacy groups.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court Allows Revocation of Temporary Protected Status for Migrants — On May 30, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to revoke the temporary protected status (TPS) of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian, and Nicaraguan migrants. This decision reverses a previous order by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, which had halted the administration's move to end humanitarian parole protections. The ruling potentially exposes many migrants to expedited removal from the U.S. while the case continues in lower courts. The decision was met with dissent from Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, who highlighted the severe consequences for affected migrants.
• Motion granted — Svitlana Doe v. Noem (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10495 — The Supreme Court allowed the administration to temporarily end the humanitarian parole program that granted provisional legal status to over 530,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (CHNV), enabling them to live and work in the U.S. while their immigration cases were pending. This decision overrules the Massachusetts district court's order that had previously blocked the administration's effort.
• Supreme Court Grants Stay in Noem v. Doe — On May 30, 2025, the Supreme Court granted the federal government's request for a stay in the case of Noem v. Doe. This decision allows the Trump administration to proceed with terminating several special parole programs that permitted approximately 500,000 individuals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela to remain legally in the United States. The stay was granted in a 7-2 decision, with Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissenting. The case originated from a challenge to the Department of Homeland Security's policy changes filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
• Supreme Court Grants Trump Administration Request on Immigration Program — The Supreme Court granted a Trump administration request for emergency relief, allowing the termination of a program that permitted over 500,000 Cubans, Nicaraguans, Haitians, and Venezuelans to temporarily live and work in the U.S. while a legal challenge continues.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court Allows Revocation of Temporary Protected Status for Migrants — On May 30, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to revoke the temporary protected status (TPS) of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian, and Nicaraguan migrants. This decision reverses a previous order by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, which had halted the administration's move to end humanitarian parole protections. The ruling potentially exposes many migrants to expedited removal from the U.S. while the case continues in lower courts. The decision was met with dissent from Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, who highlighted the severe consequences for affected migrants.
• Motion granted — Svitlana Doe v. Noem (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10495 — The Supreme Court allowed the administration to temporarily end the humanitarian parole program that granted provisional legal status to over 530,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (CHNV), enabling them to live and work in the U.S. while their immigration cases were pending. This decision overrules the Massachusetts district court's order that had previously blocked the administration's effort.
• Supreme Court Grants Stay in Noem v. Doe — On May 30, 2025, the Supreme Court granted the federal government's request for a stay in the case of Noem v. Doe. This decision allows the Trump administration to proceed with terminating several special parole programs that permitted approximately 500,000 individuals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela to remain legally in the United States. The stay was granted in a 7-2 decision, with Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissenting. The case originated from a challenge to the Department of Homeland Security's policy changes filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
• Supreme Court Grants Trump Administration Request on Immigration Program — The Supreme Court granted a Trump administration request for emergency relief, allowing the termination of a program that permitted over 500,000 Cubans, Nicaraguans, Haitians, and Venezuelans to temporarily live and work in the U.S. while a legal challenge continues.

Supporting reports

• US court halts deportation flight to South Sudan — In late May, a US district judge in Boston intervened to stop a deportation flight to South Sudan, ruling that the Trump administration had violated an earlier order. The order allowed individuals facing deportation to third-party countries the right to legally challenge their deportation. The eight men, originally from various countries including Myanmar, Cuba, and South Sudan, were stranded in Djibouti with ICE officers after the flight was halted. The court's intervention underscores the legal rights of deportees to challenge their removal under US law.

Supporting reports

• Carlton Reico Mallard Jr. Debarred by FDA — The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a final debarment order against Carlton Reico Mallard Jr., prohibiting him from importing or offering for import any drug into the United States for 10 years. This decision follows his conviction on felony charges related to the importation of misbranded drugs and illegal importation of merchandise. Mr. Mallard did not respond to the debarment proposal, waiving his right to a hearing. The debarment is effective as of May 29, 2025.
• Quality Poultry and Seafood, Incorporated Debarred by FDA — The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a final debarment order against Quality Poultry and Seafood, Incorporated (QPS), prohibiting the company from importing food into the United States for five years. This action follows QPS's felony conviction for conspiracy to commit misbranding and wire fraud related to the importation of mislabeled seafood. QPS did not respond to the debarment proposal, waiving its right to a hearing. The debarment is effective as of May 29, 2025.
• FDA Classifies Anti-Mullerian Hormone Test System — The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified the anti-mullerian hormone test system into class II (special controls) to ensure safety and effectiveness. This classification, effective May 30, 2025, aims to enhance patient access to innovative devices by reducing regulatory burdens. The device, used to assess ovarian reserve in women, will now be subject to specific special controls in addition to general controls, mitigating risks associated with inaccurate test results.

Supporting reports

• Appeals court grants temporary pause on ruling against Trump tariffs — An appeals court has granted a temporary pause on a ruling by the New York-based court of international trade that declared Donald Trump's tariffs illegal. The initial ruling stated that Trump's tariffs exceeded the authority granted to the president, as they were not approved by Congress and were based on a claimed national emergency. The Trump administration has filed for emergency relief to avoid economic and national security harms and is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court if necessary. The ruling has significant implications for Trump's trade policy and its impact on global markets.
• Motion granted — Oregon v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Ct. Intl. Trade) 1:25-cv-00077 — The Federal Circuit granted Defendants' motion to consolidate the appeal with V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump , No. 25-1812, and granted an administrative stay while the case is on appeal.
• Motion granted — V.O.S. Selections Inc. v. Trump (Ct. Intl. Trade) 1:25-cv-00066 — The Federal Circuit granted Defendants' motion to consolidate the appeal with State of Oregon v. Trump , No. 25-1813, and granted an administrative stay while the case is on appeal.

Supporting reports

• Judge expands order protecting Harvard from Trump block on enrolling international students — A US federal judge, Allison Burroughs, has issued an injunction to block the Trump administration's efforts to prevent Harvard University from enrolling international students. This follows an emergency block issued last week after the administration announced it would revoke Harvard's ability to host international students. The Department of Homeland Security had formally notified Harvard of the withdrawal of its certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, but the judge's order maintains the status quo while the case proceeds in court.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-11472 — Judge Burroughs ruling from the bench reportedly said the court would issue a preliminary injunction.

Supporting reports

• Trump Administration Opens Investigation into California's Trans Athlete Law — The Justice Department announced an investigation into California to determine if a state law allowing trans athletes to compete in girls' sports violates Title IX. This follows Trump's executive order banning trans athletes from girls' and women's sports.

Supporting reports

• House passes the One Big Beautiful bill — The House of Representatives passed the One Big Beautiful bill, which extends tax cuts from Trump's first term, introduces new deductions for tips, overtime, and car loan interest, and funds mass deportations while reducing federal social safety net programs. The bill, supported by Republican congresswoman Ashley Hinson, has drawn criticism from constituents and awaits consideration by the Senate. The bill's passage has sparked public discontent, with some lawmakers facing backlash at town halls for their support of the legislation.

Supporting reports

• Appeal filed — Oregon v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Ct. Intl. Trade) 1:25-cv-00077 — The court granted plaintiffs summary judgment holding the tariffs unlawful. Defendants immediately appealed this decision to the Federal Circuit.
• Summary judgment ruling — V.O.S. Selections Inc. v. Trump (Ct. Intl. Trade) 1:25-cv-00066 — The court granted plaintiffs' summary judgment holding the tariffs unlawful.
• Federal Courts Rule Trump's Tariffs Unconstitutional — Two federal courts have ruled that the majority of tariffs imposed by former President Trump violate the Constitution. The U.S. Court of International Trade in New York and a federal judge in Washington, D.C., found that Trump exceeded his authority by using emergency powers to bypass Congress's taxing authority. The rulings declared the "Liberation Day" tariffs illegal, though tariffs on autos, auto parts, steel, and aluminum remain due to a specific federal statute. Trump has filed an emergency appeal, and a federal appeals court has issued a temporary stay pending further arguments.
• Court ruling blocks Trump's reciprocal tariffs — A court ruling has temporarily blocked former President Donald Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs, which were challenged by the Liberty Justice Center and a coalition of 12 Democratic state attorney generals. The lawsuit argued that Trump overstepped his executive authority by enacting broad tariffs without Congress's approval, citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as insufficient for such actions. The court found that the IEEPA does not grant the president unbounded tariff authority. The ruling is on hold pending an appeal by the Trump administration, which may escalate to the US Supreme Court.
• US Court Blocks Trump's Tariff Plan — A US federal court has ruled against Donald Trump's "liberation day" tariff plan, declaring it illegal. The court found that Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China did not meet the required test of "unusual and extraordinary threats." The White House has filed a notice of appeal, allowing the tariffs to remain in place as the case progresses. This ruling challenges Trump's trade policies and could impact ongoing trade negotiations with several countries.
• Court Rules Trump's Tariffs Illegal — A three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that President Donald J. Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs are illegal, stating that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to impose tariffs. The court blocked all tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, citing that Trump's use of this power exceeded constitutional limits. The administration plans to appeal the ruling.
• US International Court of Trade Blocks Trump's Tariffs — A panel of judges on the US International Court of Trade blocked a significant portion of President Trump's broad tariffs, including country-specific import duties such as those placed on China. This decision was in response to lawsuits arguing that Trump was improperly using federal trade law to implement tariffs without Congress's approval. However, within 24 hours, a federal appeals court paused the ruling, allowing Trump's tariffs to remain in place for the time being.
• US Trade Court Blocks Trump's Tariffs — A US trade court temporarily halted President Donald Trump's controversial tariff policy, which imposed levies on various countries. The court ruled that Trump's actions exceeded the authority granted to the president, suggesting that congressional approval was necessary for such tariffs. However, a different court later reversed this decision, allowing the tariffs to continue while legal proceedings are ongoing. The case may eventually reach the Supreme Court, where it could test the "major questions doctrine" regarding presidential authority over significant national regulations.

Supporting reports

• Appeal filed — D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10676 — The government appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the district court's April 18 preliminary injunction .
• Trump Administration Files Emergency Appeal to Supreme Court on Deportations — The Trump administration filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court seeking to lift due process orders issued by federal judges, which would make it easier to deport immigrants to countries other than their own. This move follows similar legal strategies used in contested state elections.
• White House Requests Supreme Court to Block Deportation Challenges — The Trump administration has appealed to the US Supreme Court to block a federal judge's order that allows individuals to challenge their deportations to South Sudan. This request follows a ruling by Judge Brian Murphy, who found that the administration violated a court order by deporting individuals to South Sudan without allowing them to express fears of danger. The administration argues that the court's requirements hinder its diplomatic efforts to deport individuals who cannot return to their home countries. The case highlights tensions between the judiciary and the administration over immigration policies.

Supporting reports

• Summary judgment ruling — Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr v. Executive Office of the President (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00917 — Judge Richard Leon dismissed with prejudice Plaintiffs' counts VIII (equal protection), IX (right to counsel) and XI (spending power), but granted summary judgment for Plaintiffs on the other eight counts.
• Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Executive Order Against Law Firm — A federal judge blocked President Trump's executive order targeting the law firm WilmerHale, declaring the move unconstitutional. The judge emphasized the importance of adhering to the judgment and vision of the Founding Fathers.
• U.S. District Judge strikes down Trump's executive order targeting law firm — U.S. District Judge Richard Leon struck down Trump's March 27 executive order aimed at the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, which had employed Robert Mueller. Leon ruled that the order violated the First Amendment by retaliating against the firm for protected speech.
• — U.S. District Judge Richard Leon struck down Trump's March 27 executive order aimed at the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, citing First Amendment protections against government retaliation for protected speech. The judge agreed with the firm's claim that the order was unconstitutional.

Supporting reports

• Illegal Wiretap Claims in Pentagon Leak Investigation — The White House has expressed a loss of confidence in a Pentagon leak investigation after claims emerged that an illegal warrantless NSA wiretap was used to justify the firing of three top aides. The investigation, led by Pete Hegseth, initially targeted Dan Caldwell, Darin Selnick, and Colin Carroll for allegedly leaking a top-secret document. However, the wiretap claim, which was later found to be untrue, has caused a breakdown in trust between the Pentagon and the White House. The investigation has been transferred to the office of the deputy defense secretary, Stephen Feinberg.

Supporting reports

• Trump Pardons Reality TV Stars Todd and Julie Chrisley — President Trump pardoned reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, who were convicted of fraud and conspiracy to commit tax evasion. Their daughter, Savannah Chrisley, requested the pardons after endorsing Trump at the 2024 Republican National Convention.
• Trump Pardons Reality TV Stars and Others — Donald Trump has issued pardons to several individuals, including reality TV stars Julie and Todd Chrisley, who were convicted of defrauding banks. This action is part of a broader pattern of granting clemency to individuals who align with Trump politically. Other pardons include a sheriff who accepted bribes, individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, and various figures convicted of fraud or public corruption. These pardons have raised concerns about the undermining of accountability and the justice system's focus on public corruption cases.
• Trump pardons reality TV stars Julie and Todd Chrisley — Former President Donald Trump pardoned reality TV stars Julie and Todd Chrisley, who were convicted in 2022 of defrauding community banks out of more than $30 million and tax evasion. Todd Chrisley was serving a 12-year sentence, while Julie Chrisley was serving seven years. The pardon was announced by the White House and follows a series of clemencies issued by Trump to his supporters. Savannah Chrisley, the couple's daughter, had been a vocal advocate for Trump and claimed her parents' conviction was politically motivated.
• Trump announces plans to pardon reality TV stars convicted of fraud — Trump announced plans to pardon reality TV stars Julie and Todd Chrisley, who were sentenced for conspiracy to defraud banks and tax evasion. Their daughter had previously spoken at the Republican National Convention, linking the pardons to political support.

Supporting reports

• Ruling reversed — D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10676 — Judge Murphy rejected DHS's bid to undo a ruling that it unlawfully deported six men, formerly held in ICE custody, without giving them a fair chance to seek protection from torture. The men are now detained at a U.S. military base in Djibouti. The court noted that DHS had previously agreed it could comply with the court's proposed process, but then reversed course.
• Federal Judge Rejects Trump Administration's Request on South Sudan Deportees — A federal judge rejected the Trump administration's request to delay or rescind a ruling requiring several men deported to South Sudan without due process to remain in U.S. custody while completing "reasonable fear" interviews. The judge criticized the administration for mischaracterizing his order and creating chaos.

Supporting reports

• Trump pardons Paul Walczak — Trump pardoned Paul Walczak shortly after his mother attended a high-priced fundraising dinner for Trump, raising questions about the motivations behind the pardon.
• Trump pardons nursing home executive Paul Walczak — Paul Walczak, a nursing home executive who pleaded guilty to tax crimes and was set to pay $4.4 million in restitution and serve 18 months in prison, was pardoned by Donald Trump. The pardon came after Walczak's mother attended a high-priced dinner at Mar-a-Lago. This action is part of a series of pardons issued by Trump to individuals with connections to him or his supporters.
• Trump pardons former nursing home executive for tax crimes — Trump issued a presidential pardon to Paul Walczak, a former nursing home executive who pleaded guilty to tax crimes. The pardon followed a significant donation from Walczak's mother to Trump's campaign, sparing him from prison time and restitution.

Supporting reports

• Trump pardons Sheriff Jenkins — Trump pardoned VA Sheriff Scott Jenkins, who was convicted of multiple counts of conspiracy and bribery. The decision has drawn criticism due to Jenkins' lack of remorse and the nature of his crimes.
• Trump Pardons Former Sheriff Scott Jenkins — President Trump announced a pardon for former sheriff Scott Jenkins, who was convicted of fraud and bribery. Jenkins was set to begin a 10-year sentence for accepting bribes to make businessmen auxiliary deputies, allowing them to avoid traffic tickets and carry concealed firearms without a permit.
• Trump pardons former Virginia sheriff convicted of fraud and bribery — On May 27, 2025, Donald Trump announced that he had issued an unconditional pardon to Scott Jenkins, a former sheriff of Culpeper County, Virginia. Jenkins was convicted in 2024 on charges of conspiracy, honest services fraud, and bribery for accepting over $75,000 in exchange for appointing auxiliary deputy sheriffs. He was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison in March 2025. Trump defended Jenkins, claiming he was a victim of an overzealous justice department and criticized the judge for allegedly preventing Jenkins from presenting evidence in his defense.
• Trump issues presidential pardon to former sheriff convicted of bribery — Donald Trump pardoned a former Virginia sheriff, Scott Jenkins, who was convicted of fraud and bribery and sentenced to 10 years in prison. The pardon was part of a series of clemencies issued by Trump, which appear to challenge the justice system that had previously convicted him. Trump criticized the Biden DOJ as corrupt and weaponized in his statement on Truth Social.
• — Trump granted a presidential pardon to former Culpeper County sheriff Scott Jenkins, who was convicted of conspiracy, mail and wire fraud, and bribery. Jenkins had accepted bribes to appoint untrained individuals as deputy sheriffs and was sentenced to ten years in prison.

Supporting reports

• Georgia police officer resigns after wrongful arrest of undocumented teen — Leslie O’Neal, a police officer in Dalton, Georgia, resigned after wrongfully arresting Ximena Arias-Cristobal, an undocumented college student. The arrest led to her detention in a federal immigration jail for over two weeks and potential deportation. O’Neal's resignation followed criticism and lack of support from his department. The incident highlights the impact of Georgia's law requiring local law enforcement to enter 287(g) contracts with ICE, which deputizes them to enforce immigration laws. Arias-Cristobal was released on bond, and her case has drawn national attention and support.