Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• EEOC Halts Processing of Gender Identity Discrimination Claims — The acting chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Andrea Lucas, has instructed the agency to halt the processing of claims related to gender identity discrimination. This decision, made shortly after her appointment in January 2025, has led to the classification of such complaints as the lowest priority, effectively putting them on indefinite hold. Additionally, the EEOC has dismissed six cases previously pursued against employers accused of gender identity discrimination and removed the "x" gender marker from intake forms. These actions have prompted a letter from 70 members of Congress demanding enforcement of civil rights protections for transgender and nonbinary individuals.

Supporting reports

• California Senator Alex Padilla forcibly removed from DHS press conference — California Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed by federal agents from a Department of Homeland Security press conference while attempting to ask Secretary Kristi Noem a question. Padilla was performing congressional oversight of federal operations in Los Angeles related to the deployment of troops and ICE raids. He was handcuffed and forced to the ground but not detained. Padilla's office stated that he was exercising his duty to oversee federal government actions.
• California Senator Alex Padilla removed from press conference — During a press conference, California Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed by federal agents when he attempted to ask questions about the immigration raids. Padilla, a ranking member of the judiciary subcommittee on immigration, was restrained and taken out of the room by Secret Service agents. The incident has drawn condemnation from California leaders and raised concerns about the suppression of political dissent and oversight.
• Democratic Senator Forcibly Removed from News Conference — Democratic Senator Alex Padilla was forcibly removed and handcuffed during a news conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The incident raises concerns about the treatment of elected officials and the suppression of dissent.

Supporting reports

• Appeals court temporarily returns control of California's National Guard to Trump — On June 12, 2025, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit temporarily stayed a restraining order issued by US District Judge Charles Breyer, which had declared President Trump's federalization of the California National Guard illegal. The restraining order was paused pending an emergency hearing scheduled for June 17. Judge Breyer had ruled that Trump's actions exceeded his statutory authority and violated the Tenth Amendment, ordering the return of control to California Governor Gavin Newsom. The legal battle is expected to escalate to the US Supreme Court.
• Federal judge rules against deployment of California National Guard — A federal judge ruled that President Trump had illegally deployed the California National Guard against demonstrators protesting immigration raids, ordering the force to be returned to the control of California's governor, Gavin Newsom. However, an appeals court later paused the judge's ruling, allowing Trump to retain control over the National Guard. This legal battle highlights the tension between state and federal authorities over the use of military forces in domestic law enforcement.
• Case update — Newsom v. Trump (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-04870 — The Ninth Circuit issued an administrative stay before midnight on June 12.

Supporting reports

• DOJ indicts Representative LaMonica McIver — The Department of Justice announced the indictment of Representative LaMonica McIver on three counts of "forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers" during a protest at an ICE detention center. McIver claims the charges are politically motivated.
• Indictment and Charges Against LaMonica McIver — LaMonica McIver, a Democratic representative, was indicted and charged with assaulting and interfering with immigration officers following an oversight visit to the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey. McIver has described the charges as a "brazen attempt at political intimidation." The indictment follows her arrest shortly after the center's reopening, which has been controversial due to alleged safety risks and lack of proper permits. The incident highlights ongoing tensions surrounding immigration enforcement and oversight.

Supporting reports

• ICE Detains TikTok Star Khaby Lame Over Visa Issues — Khaby Lame, a prominent TikTok influencer with 162 million followers, was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents at a Las Vegas airport for allegedly overstaying his visa. Lame, an Italian-Senegalese national, was released the same day and has since left the United States. The incident is part of a broader immigration crackdown under Donald Trump's administration, which has intensified operations against non-citizens, including those with valid documentation. Lame was granted a voluntary departure to avoid a deportation order, which could have barred him from re-entering the U.S. for up to ten years.

Supporting reports

• Democrats introduce "My Body, My Data" bill to protect reproductive health data — On June 11, 2025, Democratic lawmakers Representative Sara Jacobs, Senator Mazie Hirono, and Senator Ron Wyden introduced the "My Body, My Data" bill in both the US House and Senate. The bill aims to restrict companies from collecting, using, retaining, or disclosing information related to reproductive health unless necessary for a requested service. This includes data on pregnancy, menstruation, abortion, and contraception. The bill is a response to concerns about data privacy in the post-Roe v Wade era, where law enforcement has used data trails to identify abortion seekers. Despite its introduction, the bill faces challenges in passing due to Republican control of Congress.

Supporting reports

• ICE arrests immigrants for pro-Palestine speech — The Trump administration has targeted immigrants for their pro-Palestine speech, resulting in arrests by ICE. Individuals such as Mahmoud Khalil, a legal permanent resident, were detained for participating in protests or expressing support for Palestine. These actions highlight the administration's use of immigration enforcement to suppress political speech.
• USCIS to surveil immigrants' social media for "antisemitic activity" — USCIS announced it would begin monitoring immigrants' social media for "antisemitic activity," potentially affecting visa applications. This policy, based on executive orders, could result in the revocation of visas for pro-Palestine statements, raising concerns about free speech and privacy.
• State Department revokes visas of students involved in pro-Palestine protests — The State Department has revoked the visas of at least 800 international students, many of whom participated in pro-Palestine protests. This action, partially blocked by a federal judge, reflects the administration's efforts to suppress dissent by targeting foreign students involved in political activism.
• Judge rules Trump administration cannot detain Mahmoud Khalil as a foreign policy threat — A federal judge, Michael E. Farbiarz, ruled that the Trump administration can no longer detain Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate and Palestinian activist, on claims that he is a threat to US foreign policy. The ruling, which will take effect on Friday, allows time for an appellate review. Khalil, who has not been charged with a crime, was detained in March after being deemed a threat by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, the judge noted that Khalil could still be held for allegedly inaccurately filling out his green card application.
• Case update — Mahmoud Khalil v. William P. Joyce et al. (D.N.J.) 2:25-cv-01963 — Judge Farbiarz blocked the Trump administration from deporting pro-Palestinian Columbia University protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil, ruling that the government's effort to deport Khalil by arguing his presence would “have serious adverse foreign policy consequences” chills Khalil's First Amdendment Rights.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration pulls grant funding from American Bar Association — The Trump administration canceled federal grant funding for the American Bar Association after it criticized Trump. A judge temporarily blocked the cancellation, highlighting the administration's use of funding as a tool for political retaliation.

Supporting reports

• Department of Defense bans books from Naval Academy — The Department of Defense ordered the removal of nearly 400 books from the U.S. Naval Academy library, targeting works related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Although some books have been returned, the action reflects a broader effort to control educational content in military institutions.
• Department of Defense bans DEI-related books and instruction — The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) instructed schools to remove books and cancel activities related to gender ideology and DEI. This directive, part of compliance with executive orders, has led to legal challenges from students claiming First Amendment violations.
• Departments of Veterans Affairs and State ban pride flags — The Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Department of State have banned the display of pride flags and similar symbols in employees' private offices and consular posts. This action reflects the administration's stance against LGBTQ+ visibility in government spaces.

Supporting reports

• Speaker Mike Johnson comments on Gavin Newsom — Speaker Mike Johnson stated that California Governor Gavin Newsom should be "tarred and feathered" in response to a question about whether he should be arrested. Johnson declined to provide legal analysis on the matter. Newsom responded by criticizing the suggestion as a medieval form of punishment and emphasized the importance of due process.

Supporting reports

• Trump warns against protests during military parade — Former President Trump warned that anyone planning to protest during his birthday military parade would be met with "very big force." He characterized the protesters as people who "hate our country."
• Trump Warns Protesters of Heavy Force at Military Parade — President Trump warned that protesters at his upcoming military parade would be met with "very heavy force," signaling a potential crackdown on dissent. This statement reflects the administration's aggressive stance toward public demonstrations.

Supporting reports

• Appeal filed — King County v. Turner (W.D. Wash.) 2:25-cv-00814 — Defendants appealed Judge Rothstein's preliminary injunction order to the Ninth Circuit.
• Case update — President and Fellows of Harvard College v. US Department of Health and Human Services (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-11048 — State Attorneys General submitted an amicus brief in support of Plaintiffs.
• Case update — State of California v. Department of Justice (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-04863 — Plaintiffs filed for a declaratory and injunctive relief against all defendants and an injunction against the US government/official or APA vacatur requested. Complaints modified on June 10.
• Dismissal entered — Denver Public Schools v. Noem (D. Colo.) 1:25-cv-00474 — Plaintiffs dismissed all claims in the action in their entirety. The civil case was terminated on that same day.
• Motion to dismiss decided — J. Doe 4 v. Musk (D. Md.) 8:25-cv-00462 — The Fourth Circuit granted the Defendants' motion for abeyance until the district court resolves the motion to dismiss or otherwise issues any subsequent appealable order.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — American Federation of Government Employees, et al. v. Office of Personnel Management et al (S.D.N.Y.) 1:25-cv-01237 — Judge Cote granted Plaintiffs' preliminary injunction motion, temporarily blocking OPM from continuing to share federal employee records with individuals tied to DOGE. The court cited questions about whether the data-sharing violates the Privacy Act, violates OPM's internal privacy safeguards, and risks irreparable harm to employees' personal data.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Angelica S. v. Dept of Health and Human Services (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01405 — In a memorandum opinion and order , the court granted Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and granted in part and denied in part the Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, enjoining the new proof of identification and income requirements but denying an injunction on the Interim Final Rule.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — San Francisco AIDS Foundation et al v. Trump (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-01824 — Judge Jon Steven Tigar granted in part and denied in part the Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction and blocked the administration from enforcing anti-diversity and anti-transgender executive orders in grant funding requirements, ruling that the government cannot force recipients to halt programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion or acknowledge the existence of transgender people in order to receive grant funds. Judge Tigar's official order was filed on June 13.
• Temporary restraining order ruling — Valuta Corporation, Inc. v. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (W.D. Tex.) 3:25-cv-00191 — Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order.
• Case update — J.G.G. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00766 — The Defendants also filed a motion before Judge Boasberg to stay its June 4 order pending appeal.
• Case update — Make the Road New York et al v. Kristi Noem (Acting Secretary of Homeland Security) et al (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00190 — The plaintiffs filed a motion to postpone agency action.
• Case update — National Treasury Employees Union v. Donald J. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00420 — Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint , which added additional Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and ultra vires violations.
• Case update — Newsom v. Trump (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-04870 — Judge Breyer scheduled a hearing on California's request for a temporary order restraining Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth from ordering National Guard troops and Marines to support immigration raids in Los Angeles.
• Case update — Suri v. Trump (E.D. Va.) 1:25-cv-00480 — Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.
• Case update — The Associated Press v. Budowich (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00532 — Plaintiffs filed an emergency petition for rehearing en banc of the stay order in the D.C. Circuit.
• Notice of appeal filed — J.G.G. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00766 — The Defendants filed a notice of appeal in the district court from Judge Boasberg's June 4 order granting class certification and a preliminary injunction directing the Government to facilitate habeas review. The appeal was then docketed in the D.C. Circuit as Case No. 25-5217.
• Stay motion decided — Solutions In Hometown Connections v. Noem (D. Md.) 8:25-cv-00885 — Judge Griggsby granted the parties' joint motion to stay the district court proceedings pending the decision from the Fourth Circuit.
• Stay pending appeal decided — J.G.G. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00766 — The Defendants/Appellants filed an emergency motion with the D.C. Circuit, requesting both an administrative stay and a stay pending appeal.
• Stay pending appeal decided — Oregon v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Ct. Intl. Trade) 1:25-cv-00077 — The D.C. Circuit entered an administrative stay of Judge Boasberg's June 4 order “to give [it] sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal.”
• Stay pending appeal decided — V.O.S. Selections Inc. v. Trump (Ct. Intl. Trade) 1:25-cv-00066 — The Federal Circuit granted a stay pending appeal and ordered an expedited en banc consideration on the merits.
• Summary judgment ruling — Brehm v. Marocco (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00660 — Judge Leon granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the USADF's board members in February.
• Case update — Mahmoud Khalil v. William P. Joyce et al. (D.N.J.) 2:25-cv-01963 — Plaintiffs filed a reply to Defendants' opposition to their motion for a temporary restraining order.
• Case update — Oregon Council for the Humanities v. United States DOGE Service (D. Or.) 3:25-cv-00829 — Judge Farbiarz blocked the Trump administration from deporting pro-Palestinian Columbia University protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil, ruling that the government's effort to deport Khalil by arguing his presence would “have serious adverse foreign policy consequences” chills Khalil's First Amdendment Rights.
• Complaint filed — Al Otro Lado v. Trump — Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint . The amended complaint adds more detailed allegations about the NEH's internal processes and includes new factual developments, such as NEH's May 2025 Congressional Justification indicating plans to shut down the agency and the June partial rescission of grant terminations. A new cause of action was added under the Impoundment Control Act and the Appropriations Act alleging ultra vires conduct, and the Separation of Powers claim has been expanded to include violations of the Appropriations Clause, Spending Clause and Take Care Clause. Finally, the amended complaint requests vacatur of both the termination and rescission decisions, and seeks broader injunctive relief including restoration of full funding and reinstatement of NEH's Federal/State Partnership office.
• Case update — State of Rhode Island v. Trump (D.R.I.) 1:25-cv-00128 — On June 11, 2025, two immigration nonprofits, Al Otro Lado and Haitian Bridge Alliance, filed a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of California against President Donald Trump and other federal officials. The lawsuit challenges Executive Order 10888, issued on January 20, 2025, which bars immigrants arriving after that date from invoking provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act to remain in the U.S. while pursuing asylum claims. The plaintiffs argue that the EO violates the INA and the Administrative Procedure Act, and they seek to enjoin its implementation.
• Cases consolidated — League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. Executive Office of the President (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00946 — Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint .
• Dismissal entered — Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al. v. CFPB (D. Md.) 1:25-cv-00458 — Judge Kollar-Kotelly allowed the Republican National Committee (RNC) to intervene as a Defendant in the consolidated cases against Plaintiffs' claims regarding Sections 2(a), 2(b), 2(d), 3(a), and 7(a) of the EO. On that same day, RNC answered the complaints of each of the consolidated cases. RNC's answers to LULAC , DNC , and League of Women Voters denied the plaintiffs' allegations and argued that Plaintiffs failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted. Additionally, RNC's answer to League of Women Voters alleged that the League of Women Voters lacked standing to bring forth their claims.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — American Educational Research Association v. Department of Education (D. Md.) 8:25-cv-01230 — Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the case without prejudice as the Defendants have repeatedly represented that there is no mechanism by which the Defendants can transfer money away from, or otherwise relinquish control over the money in, the Bureau fund. On this basis, Plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed the action but will undertake further actions as appropriate if Defendants later transfer Bureau funds in contradiction of their representations.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00943 — Judge Stephanie Gallagher denied Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, on the basis that the request is overbroad given factual discrepancies and that Plaintiffs have not shown they are entitled to extraordinary relief based on the alleged harms.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Protect Our Coast NJ v. USA (D.N.J.) 3:25-cv-06890 — The district court denied Plaintiffs' motion for an injunction pending their appeal of the court's April 10 denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction. The court found that Plaintiffs failed to show irreparable harm, thereby failing to satisfy a key element for injunctions.
• Stay motion decided — J.G.G. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00766 — Plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion for order to show cause, seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent Defendants from proceeding with installation and construction activities for Empire Wind.
• Case update — American Federation Of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-03698 — Judge Boasberg denied without prejudice the Defendants' motion to stay his June 4 order pending appeal as moot, noting that the D.C. Circuit had already granted an administrative stay.
• Notice of appeal filed — Orr v. Trump (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10313 — Judge Illson issued an order on the scope of injunctive relief , in which the court held that the State Department's imminent widespread reductions in force as part of its reorganization plans is barred by the existing injunction.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Washington State Association of Head Start and Early Childhood Assistance and Education Program, et al, v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr — Judge Farbiarz found that the government may continue to detain Mahmoud Khalil on a separate immigration charge, so long as detention is not based on the government's initial determination that Khalil is a national security threat. This ruling comes after the government responded to the court's June 11 order , claiming that the court did not order Khalil's release, but only barred his detention.
• Summary judgment ruling — Boyle v. Trump (D. Md.) 8:25-cv-01628 — Defendants filed a notice of appeal to the First Circuit as to Judge Julia Kobik's April 18 Order of Preliminary Injunction.
• — Plaintiffs filed a reply to Defendants' opposition response to the motion for preliminary injunction.
• — Judge Matthew Maddox issued a summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs.

Supporting reports

• California AG Files Lawsuit Against Trump — California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a lawsuit against former President Trump, challenging the legality of his order to federalize the California National Guard. Bonta argues that the order was unnecessary and escalated tensions, leading to increased unrest. The lawsuit contends that the federalization of the National Guard was an abuse of federal authority and violated state rights.
• California lawsuit against Trump over National Guard deployment — California Governor Gavin Newsom's lawsuit against Trump regarding the federalization of the National Guard is set to be heard by Judge Charles Breyer.
• California Sues Over National Guard Deployment — California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to rescind the deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles, arguing that it violates the state's sovereign rights and was done without lawful federal authority. This legal challenge highlights the ongoing conflict between state and federal powers.
• California files lawsuit against Trump administration over National Guard deployment — On June 9, 2025, California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging the federalization of the state's National Guard to manage immigration protests in Los Angeles. The lawsuit claims that President Trump's deployment of troops exceeded federal authority and violated the 10th Amendment, bypassing Governor Gavin Newsom's authority. California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the legal action, seeking a court declaration that the deployment was unlawful and a restraining order to halt the use of troops. The lawsuit argues that the federal intervention was unnecessary and escalated tensions.
• California Governor announces lawsuit against Trump administration — Governor Gavin Newsom announced plans to sue the Trump administration over its decision to deploy the National Guard to Los Angeles without state consent. The lawsuit, previewed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, argues that the federal government overstepped its authority and violated state sovereignty. Newsom and Bonta contend that the deployment was unnecessary and inflammatory, as there was no significant threat that warranted such federal intervention. The legal challenge aims to protect state rights and prevent federal overreach in state matters.
• California sues federal government over National Guard deployment — The state of California has filed a lawsuit against the federal government following President Trump's deployment of 2,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles without the consent of Governor Gavin Newsom. The lawsuit claims this action violates state sovereignty and challenges the legality of federal intervention in state matters.
• California Attorney General and Governor Sue Trump Over National Guard Deployment — California attorney general Rob Bonta and Governor Gavin Newsom filed a lawsuit against President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for the unauthorized federalization of the California National Guard, calling the order unlawful and inflammatory.
• Case update — Newsom v. Trump (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-04870 — State Attorneys General submitted an amicus brief in support of Plaintiffs.
• Temporary restraining order ruling — Newsom v. Trump (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-04870 — State Attorneys General submitted an amicus brief in support of Defendants.
• Federal judge rules against Trump's troop deployment in LA — In a brief , the Department of Justice called the claims “baseless,” arguing that judicial intervention “would not only hinder federal law enforcement but also expose federal employees and property to violence and vandalism by the rioters in Los Angeles.”
• Judge Rules Against Trump's Federalization of National Guard — Judge Breyer heard arguments on California's request for a temporary order restraining Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth from ordering National Guard troops and Marines to support immigration raids in Los Angeles.
• — Judge Breyer granted a temporary restraining order enjoining the administration from deploying members of the California National Guard in Los Angeles and directing the administration to return control of the California National Guard to Governor Newsom.
• — A federal judge ruled that President Trump's deployment of federal troops to Los Angeles to assist in civilian law enforcement was unlawful, bypassing congressionally mandated procedures. The ruling came in response to a legal challenge by California Governor Gavin Newsom. However, the administration appealed the decision, and a higher court temporarily paused the restraining order, allowing the deployment to continue until a hearing scheduled for the following Tuesday.
• — U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer ruled that President Trump unlawfully federalized the California National Guard, ordering the return of troops to Governor Gavin Newsom's control. The judge granted a restraining order but delayed enforcement until Friday at noon, while a panel of the 9th Circuit issued a stay allowing Trump to retain control until a hearing on June 17.

Supporting reports

• Trump Administration Ramps Up Deportations and Surveillance of Immigrants — The Trump administration has intensified deportation efforts and increased surveillance of immigrants in New York City. The use of electronic monitoring devices, such as GPS ankle bracelets, has expanded under the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) programs Alternatives to Detention (ATD) and Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP). These measures have led to heightened fear and anxiety among immigrants, many of whom are asylum seekers without criminal convictions. The administration's actions have also resulted in increased police presence and digital surveillance, affecting entire neighborhoods and causing a decline in local business activity.

Supporting reports

• ICE raids conducted in Los Angeles — On Friday, the Department of Homeland Security conducted coordinated raids across multiple locations in Los Angeles, resulting in the arrest of at least 45 individuals without warrants. The raids, which targeted places such as Home Depot stores and a clothing manufacturer, were met with protests from the community and condemnation from California leaders, including Governor Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass. The raids are part of a series of high-profile immigration enforcement actions under orders from the Trump administration, drawing criticism for their impact on immigrant communities and families.
• DHS conducts immigration raids in Los Angeles — Masked officials from the Department of Homeland Security conducted immigration raids in Los Angeles, resulting in the arrest of David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California. The union condemned the raids, calling for an end to such actions that disrupt communities and harm working people.
• Criticism of Federal Immigration Enforcement Tactics — Federal immigration enforcement tactics in Los Angeles, including raids and the use of military-style force, have been criticized by civil rights groups and local officials. The tactics have been described as excessive and harmful to immigrant communities, raising concerns about the impact on civil liberties and community trust.
• Federal Agents Use Force in Los Angeles Raid — Federal agents in military-style tactical gear used flash-bang grenades during a raid on a clothing wholesaler in Los Angeles. The operation was part of a series of raids by ICE in the area, targeting stores, restaurants, and a Home Depot where day laborers gather. The show of force included agents in helmets and camouflage, arriving in armored trucks and unmarked vehicles, and was met by immigrant activists and supporters. The agents carried riot shields and weapons, including less-than-lethal ammunition.
• ICE Raids and Protests in Los Angeles — ICE conducted raids in Los Angeles, targeting stores, restaurants, and a Home Depot where day laborers gather. The raids were met with protests from immigrant activists and supporters. The use of force by federal agents, including flash-bang grenades and military-style tactics, has drawn criticism from civil rights groups and local officials.
• Criticism of Federal Immigration Crackdown in LA — As federal agents prepared for an immigration crackdown in Los Angeles, the operation faced criticism for its aggressive approach. The presence of TV personality Dr. Phil and his camera crew during the raids highlighted the controversial nature of the enforcement actions. Critics argue that the crackdown exacerbates tensions and undermines community trust in law enforcement.
• Federal crackdown on immigration in Los Angeles. — Federal officials launched a new phase of immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, focusing on workplaces in the garment district. This operation involved agents in tactical gear confronting protesters, leading to clashes and arrests.
• Federal Agents Conduct Immigration Raids Without Judicial Warrants — Federal agents carried out immigration raids in Los Angeles without judicial warrants, leading to clashes with protesters. The actions included detaining families in federal buildings and denying them access to legal representation.
• Federal raids on immigrants in Los Angeles — Federal agents conducted immigration raids at workplaces across Los Angeles, targeting undocumented immigrants. These actions have sparked protests in the city, which is home to a large immigrant population. The raids are part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration to increase deportations, with a new quota demanding 3,000 arrests per day. The presence of multiple federal agencies, including ICE, FBI SWAT teams, and US Marshals, has been noted, with reports of paramilitary tactics being used. The raids have led to fear and decreased activity in immigrant neighborhoods.
• Arrests of 118 immigrants during ICE raids — During recent ICE raids in Los Angeles, 118 immigrants were arrested, with claims from the Department of Homeland Security that many were criminals. However, local advocates have disputed these claims, stating that the arrests were not based on judicial warrants and lacked credible evidence. This incident has sparked outrage within the community and has led to increased protests against the federal government's immigration policies.
• Federal immigration raids across California — Federal immigration authorities, under the Trump administration, have conducted sweeping raids across California, targeting homes, workplaces, and public spaces such as churches and car washes. These actions are part of a broader immigration crackdown, with reports of arrests in various locations, including Los Angeles and its suburbs. The raids have sparked fear and disruption in communities, particularly among Latino populations. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, has criticized the federal actions as illegal and unconstitutional, while local leaders have expressed concern over the impact on community safety and cohesion.

Supporting reports

• Congressional Representatives Denied Access to Detainees — Representatives Jimmy Gomez, Luz Rivas, Norma Torres, and Lou Correa were denied access to check on detainees arrested during federal raids in Los Angeles. The representatives were turned away by a federal agent despite federal law allowing members of Congress to conduct oversight visits. The detainees reportedly lacked access to food, water, and medicine, raising concerns about their treatment and rights.
• Democratic lawmakers denied entry to detention centers in LA and New York — Over the weekend, Democratic members of Congress from California and New York were denied entry to federal detention facilities in Los Angeles and New York City. The lawmakers, including Maxine Waters, Jimmy Gomez, and Norma Torres, sought to inspect conditions and check on individuals detained during recent immigration raids and protests. The Department of Homeland Security stated that the lawmakers were turned away for safety reasons, citing large numbers of rioters. The lawmakers argued that their congressional roles entitled them to conduct oversight of the detention conditions and the welfare of detainees.
• Members of Congress Barred from ICE Detention Facilities — Five members of Congress reported being barred from entering ICE detention facilities to conduct oversight, despite having legal authority to do so. This included attempts by representatives from New York and California to check on the well-being of detainees.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge blocks deportation under Alien Enemies Act — A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from deporting a Venezuelan man under the Alien Enemies Act, citing a lack of due process. The judge noted that Trump's authority under the Act is "close to 'unlimited.'"
• Judge rules Venezuelan deportations illegal — Judge James Boasberg ruled that nearly 140 Venezuelan men deported to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act were illegally deported, although he did not order their return to the US.
• Case update — M.A.P.S. v. Garite (W.D. Tex.) 3:25-cv-00171 — Judge Briones found that the administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act was illegal, declining to “stretch the AEA's meaning so broadly that mass migration or criminal activities by some members of a particular nationality could qualify as an ‘invasion.'” The court's ruling blocks deportations under the Act in the Western District of Texas.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — M.A.P.S. v. Garite (W.D. Tex.) 3:25-cv-00171 — Judge Briones granted a preliminary injunction .
• Court Blocks Deportations Under Alien Enemies Act — A federal court ruled that Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport immigrants to El Salvador was illegal, blocking deportations under the act in the Western District of Texas. The ruling requires the administration to allow migrants 30 days to challenge their designation.
• Case update — Sanchez Puentes v. Garite (W.D. Tex.) 3:25-cv-00127 — Judge Briones entered a final judgment order granting the relief of the petitioners and granting the petitioners' Amended Verified Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Request for Order to Show Cause.

Supporting reports

• Newark Mayor sues US Attorney over false arrest — Newark Mayor Ras Baraka filed a lawsuit against Alina Habba, the interim US Attorney for the District of New Jersey, over a "false arrest" incident outside an ICE detention facility, alleging malicious prosecution.
• Newark Mayor Ras Baraka Arrested by ICE — On May 9, 2025, Ras Baraka, the Mayor of Newark, New Jersey, was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) while attempting to inspect Delaney Hall, a federal immigration detention center. Baraka, who was accompanied by three congressmembers, was charged with trespassing. The charges were later dropped by Trump administration officials, which led to a rebuke from Judge André Espinosa for the hasty prosecution of an elected representative. Baraka has since filed a lawsuit against New Jersey’s top federal prosecutor for false arrest and malicious prosecution.

Supporting reports

• US Supreme Court Allows Doge Access to Social Security Data — The US Supreme Court lifted an injunction, allowing the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) to access sensitive records from the Social Security Administration during ongoing legal challenges. The decision, supported by the conservative majority, permits Doge, a team led by Elon Musk, to access data to target alleged waste and fraud. The ruling faced dissent from the court's liberal justices and opposition from labor unions and advocacy groups concerned about privacy violations. The case continues as opponents argue the access could lead to misuse of personal data.
• Motion granted — American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO v. Social Security Administration (D. Md.) 1:25-cv-00596 — The Supreme Court granted a stay while the case is on appeal.
• Supreme Court Grants Stay in Social Security Administration v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees — The Supreme Court granted a stay in the case of Social Security Administration v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. This decision allows the Social Security Administration to proceed with its actions that were previously challenged by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. The stay was granted despite dissent from Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson, indicating a division within the Court on this matter. The stay effectively pauses the lower court's ruling against the Social Security Administration, pending further litigation.

Supporting reports

• West Virginia Prosecutor Suggests Women Report Miscarriages to Police

Supporting reports

• House Oversight Committee Democrats Demand Epstein Files — The House Oversight Committee Democrats formally demanded that FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi release all files and evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. This demand follows posts by Elon Musk suggesting former President Trump was implicated in the FBI's Epstein files. The committee noted that Bondi had promised to release these documents three months ago and questioned why no additional documents have been released since February 27, 2025.

Supporting reports

• Federal court rules San Diego yoga class ban unconstitutional — A federal appeals court ruled that a San Diego ordinance banning yoga classes of four or more people at shoreline parks and beaches was unconstitutional, stating that teaching yoga is "protected speech" under the First Amendment. The decision by the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled a previous judgment by a San Diego judge. The ordinance, enacted in 2024, was challenged by instructors Steven Hubbard and Amy Baack, who argued it violated their rights. The city had defended the ordinance as a regulation of commercial activity, but the court found it specifically targeted yoga instruction.

Supporting reports

• US judge temporarily halts deportation of Colorado fire attack suspect’s family — On Wednesday, a federal judge in Colorado, Gordon Gallagher, issued an order temporarily blocking the deportation of the family of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, who is charged with a firebombing attack in Boulder, Colorado. The judge's decision came after Soliman's wife and five children were taken into federal custody by US immigration authorities. The court found that deportation without due process could cause irreparable harm, prompting the issuance of the order. The family, who are Egyptian nationals, are seeking asylum in the US, and their lawyers argue that punishing them for Soliman's alleged crimes is unlawful.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge rules migrants in El Salvador must be allowed to challenge deportations — US district chief judge James Boasberg in Washington DC ruled that the Trump administration must allow over 100 migrants sent to a prison in El Salvador to challenge their deportations. These migrants, accused of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, were sent under an 18th-century wartime law. The judge found significant evidence suggesting many are not connected to the gang and ordered the administration to provide a way for them to file challenges within a week.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — J.G.G. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00766 — Judge Boasberg issued an order and memorandum opinion . The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for class certification of the detainees in CECOT prison and a preliminary injunction stating: "The Government must facilitate the Class's ability to seek habeas relief to contest their removal under the Act." However, Judge Boasberg held that the detainees are not currently in the “constructive custody” of the United States for the present purposes of habeas. He also denied class certification for individuals held in the United States in criminal custody.

Supporting reports

• Judge orders return of deported Guatemalan man to the US — A US district judge in Boston, Brian Murphy, ordered the return of a Guatemalan man, identified as OCG, who was deported to Mexico despite fearing persecution there. The deportation was found to lack due process, as the US Department of Justice admitted to an error in claiming OCG was not afraid of being sent to Mexico. OCG, who is gay, had applied for asylum in the US after facing homophobic violence in Guatemala. The judge's order requires that if the Department of Homeland Security seeks to deport him again, he must be given due process.
• Case update — D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10676 — O.G.C.'s attorney stated that his client was flowing back to the United States.