Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Trump claims Biden's pardons are invalid — Trump declared that pardons issued by President Biden to members of the January 6 Committee are invalid, claiming they were signed by autopen and thus void. This assertion challenges the legitimacy of presidential pardon powers and could lead to legal and political conflicts over the scope of executive authority.
• Trump declared Biden pardons void — On Truth Social, Trump declared that the pardons issued by President Joe Biden in mid-January are "void, vacant and of no further force or effect," claiming they were signed with autopen. The pardons included members of Congress on the Jan. 6 Select Committee, Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Biden's family members.
• Trump claims Biden's pardons are void — Donald Trump claimed that pardons signed by President Joe Biden were "void, vacant and of no further force and effect" because they were signed with an autopen. Trump made this claim on his social media platform and reiterated it to reporters on Air Force One. The claim follows a report by the Heritage Foundation criticizing Biden's use of the autopen. However, historical precedent and legal interpretations suggest that the method of signing does not invalidate presidential pardons. Biden had issued pre-emptive pardons to family members and members of the House committee investigating the January 6 attack.
• Trump declares Biden's pardons void — President Donald Trump declared the presidential pardons issued by his predecessor, President Joe Biden, "VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT." This statement implies a belief that he can unilaterally alter the legal status of pardons, which is not supported by the Constitution.
• Trump Declares Biden's Pardons Void — President Donald Trump declared the presidential pardons issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden, as “VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT.” This statement suggests an intention to investigate members of the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack, challenging the legal standing of presidential pardons.

Supporting reports

• Attorney General Bondi issues statement opposing federal judge's deportation block — Attorney General Pamela Bondi issued a statement on March 15, 2025, characterizing a federal judge's order blocking deportations as prioritizing terrorist organizations over public safety. Bondi alleged the order disregards presidential authority and stated the Department of Justice would continue efforts with the White House and Department of Homeland Security to enforce deportations, framing the effort as stopping an "invasion."

Supporting reports

• Trump administration deports Venezuelans despite court order — The Trump administration deported approximately 250 alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador, invoking the Alien Enemies Act. This action occurred despite a verbal order from U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg to halt the deportations and return any flights already in progress. The administration argued that the deportees were no longer in U.S. territory when the order was issued, thus claiming the order was not applicable. A hearing was scheduled to address the administration's compliance with the court order.
• US deports 250 alleged gang members to El Salvador despite court ruling — The US deported over 250 alleged gang members to El Salvador, defying a US federal judge's ruling to halt the flights. The deportations were justified by invoking the Alien Enemies Act, a wartime law. The deportees included members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and the Salvadoran gang MS-13. The US administration claimed the judge had no authority to block the deportations, while the judge had ordered flights to return. The deportations are part of a deal with El Salvador to hold the individuals in a large detention center.
• Administration violates court order on deportations — Reports indicated that the Trump administration may have violated Judge Boasberg's order by allowing deportation flights to proceed despite the restraining order. The judge had ordered that any planes in the air carrying the targeted individuals be returned to the United States, but flights continued to El Salvador.
• Trump administration defies court order on deportations — The Trump administration did not recall deportation flights of Venezuelan migrants despite a federal judge's instructions. The administration argued that the judge's verbal instructions were not included in the formal written order, and thus did not need to be followed. The deportation flights, which had already taken off, landed in El Salvador. The administration's actions have raised questions about the limits of judicial authority and the administration's compliance with court orders.

Supporting reports

• Bove instructed DOJ to ignore federal court order blocking deportations — During a March 14, 2025 meeting, Emil Bove told DOJ officials that planes carrying individuals subject to deportation under the Alien Enemies Act "needed to take off no matter what" and stated the DOJ would need to consider telling courts "fuck you" and ignore any court order blocking the removals. On March 15, after a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order halting the deportations, Bove directed that the flights proceed anyway, instructing DHS that the court order did not apply because the planes had left U.S. airspace before the written order was issued—a legal position contradicted by binding judicial authority.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order on Paul Weiss Risks — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14237 to address risks associated with the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. The order mandates a review of security clearances for individuals at Paul Weiss, cessation of government services to the firm, and a review of government contracts involving the firm. The order aims to prevent taxpayer funds from supporting activities deemed harmful to American interests, including racial discrimination and actions inconsistent with national security.
• Executive Order: Addressing Risks From Paul Weiss — President Donald Trump issued an executive order on March 14, 2025, targeting the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. The order mandates a review and potential suspension of security clearances for individuals at the firm, citing national interest concerns. It also directs federal agencies to cease providing goods and services to Paul Weiss and to review and potentially terminate contracts with the firm. The order aims to prevent taxpayer dollars from supporting activities deemed inconsistent with American interests, including alleged racial discrimination and actions against national security.
• Trump signed executive order targeting law firm Paul Weiss with security clearance suspensions, contract terminations, and personnel restrictions. — President Trump signed an executive order on March 14, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by Paul Weiss employees, terminate government contracts with the firm, restrict employee access to federal buildings, and limit hiring of firm personnel. The order cites the firm's representation of January 6 defendants, employment of former prosecutor Mark Pomerantz, and alleged racial discrimination in hiring. Agencies must submit compliance assessments within 30 days.
• White House issues fact sheet on executive order suspending security clearances for Paul Weiss law firm employees — The White House published a fact sheet stating that President Trump signed an executive order suspending security clearances held by employees of Paul Weiss law firm and attorney Mark Pomerantz, pending review of whether such clearances align with the national interest. The order directs the federal government to halt material and services to the firm, restrict building access, terminate contracts, and refrain from hiring its employees unless authorized. The fact sheet characterizes the firm's practices as warranting civil rights review under Title VII.

Supporting reports

• Emil Bove directs DOJ lawyers to disregard potential court orders on migrant deportations — On March 14, 2025, Emil Bove, the third-highest official at the DOJ, met with lawyers in the immigration section and told them that Trump would invoke the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport more than 100 Venezuelan migrants without due process. Bove stated that "those planes need to take off, no matter what" and told attendees that if a court issued an order preventing the deportation, the DOJ "may have to consider telling that court, 'f*** you.'" The statement was made to career attorneys and signaled willingness to defy federal court orders.

Supporting reports

• Trump dismisses corruption case against New York mayor — President Donald Trump, during a speech at the Department of Justice, praised his defense lawyer Emil Bove for forcing the dismissal of a corruption case against New York mayor Eric Adams. This action was part of Trump's broader effort to assert control over the Justice Department, which he has been accused of turning into an extension of the White House. The dismissal reflects Trump's influence over legal proceedings and his administration's approach to handling cases involving political figures.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department dismisses environmental enforcement lawsuit against Denka, citing end to "DEI programs" — The Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Biden Administration against Denka Performance Elastomer LLC on March 7, 2025. The suit, filed February 28, 2023, alleged that the company's neoprene manufacturing facility in LaPlace, Louisiana posed an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health under the Clean Air Act's emergency powers provision. The dismissal was framed as fulfilling President Trump's executive order to end "radical DEI programs." EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin stated the agency would enforce environmental law "without improperly implementing so-called 'environmental justice.'"
• Trump administration drops environmental lawsuit — The Trump administration has agreed to drop a lawsuit against the Denka synthetic rubber plant in Reserve, Louisiana, which was filed under the Biden administration in February 2023. The lawsuit aimed to curb emissions of chloroprene, a likely human carcinogen, from the plant. The decision to dismiss the case was made in compliance with an executive order issued by Trump targeting "wasteful government" and "DEI programs." This move has been criticized by local community leaders who are concerned about the health risks posed by the plant's emissions.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order on Perkins Coie LLP — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14230, addressing alleged risks posed by the law firm Perkins Coie LLP. The order mandates a review of security clearances held by Perkins Coie employees, cessation of government services to the firm, and scrutiny of government contracts involving the firm. It also directs investigations into racial discrimination practices by large law firms, including Perkins Coie, and limits federal engagement with the firm to protect national security interests.
• Executive Order: Addressing Risks from Perkins Coie LLP — President Donald Trump issued an executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie LLP, citing its alleged involvement in activities undermining democratic elections and engaging in racial discrimination. The order mandates a review of security clearances held by Perkins Coie employees, cessation of government services to the firm, and scrutiny of government contracts involving the firm. It also directs the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to review large law firms for compliance with non-discrimination laws. The order aims to align federal contracting and personnel policies with national security interests and anti-discrimination laws.
• Trump administration suspends security clearances and restricts access for Perkins Coie LLP employees — The White House issued a fact sheet announcing that President Trump signed an executive order suspending security clearances held by Perkins Coie LLP employees pending review, halting government material and services to the firm, restricting employee access to government buildings, prohibiting federal hiring of its staff, and directing termination of all federal contracts with the firm. The fact sheet characterizes the firm's legal work as "unethical and discriminatory" and references past litigation involving the firm.
• Trump signed executive order targeting law firm Perkins Coie LLP with security clearance suspensions, contract terminations, and personnel restrictions. — President Trump signed an executive order on March 6, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by Perkins Coie employees, terminate or review federal contracts with the firm, require contractors to disclose business relationships with Perkins Coie, restrict employee access to federal buildings, and limit hiring of Perkins Coie staff. The order cites the firm's 2016 work on the Steele dossier, litigation against election laws, and diversity hiring practices as justification. The Attorney General and EEOC Chair are directed to investigate large law firms for alleged racial discrimination in hiring and promotion.
• Trump suspends security clearances for law firm employees — President Trump signed an executive order suspending security clearances for employees of a law firm that previously worked for Hillary Clinton. The order also urges agency heads to terminate contracts with the firm, raising legal and ethical concerns.

Supporting reports

• White House issues fact sheet on memorandum directing federal agencies to enforce Rule 65(c) bond requirements in litigation against the government — The White House published a fact sheet on March 6, 2025, describing a presidential memorandum signed by President Trump directing federal agencies to enforce Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), which requires plaintiffs seeking preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders against the government to post security (financial bonds) to cover potential costs or damages if the injunction is later found unjustified. The fact sheet frames this as deterring "frivolous lawsuits" and "activist judges" while protecting taxpayer funds.
• Trump signs memo on lawsuit fees — President Trump signed a memo urging agencies to enforce a rule requiring those who sue the administration to pay a fee upfront. Legal experts warn this could deter individuals and groups from filing lawsuits against the government, impacting access to justice.

Supporting reports

• Kilmar Ábrego García deported in violation of 2019 immigration court order — Kilmar Ábrego García was deported to El Salvador in March in violation of a 2019 immigration court order that prevented his repatriation on grounds of possible persecution. He remained in custody in El Salvador's Cecot terrorism confinement facility for weeks while administration officials claimed inability to comply with a court order to facilitate his return. He was eventually returned to the US this month after the government secured a federal indictment accusing him of being a co-conspirator in a people-smuggling ring.
• Trump administration defies court order to return mistakenly deported Maryland resident — Kilmar Ábrego García, a Maryland resident with a federal deportation protection order, was arrested by immigration agents in March and deported to El Salvador without a court hearing, along with over 200 Venezuelan deportees. The Trump administration has admitted the deportation was in error but refuses to comply with court orders requiring his return. A federal appeals court on Thursday denied the administration's appeal and issued a scathing rebuke, stating the government cannot "stash away residents" in foreign prisons without due process. The White House posted mockingly on X that Ábrego García is "never coming back."
• Federal judge orders administration not to deport Kilmar Ábrego García to El Salvador — A federal judge issued an order prohibiting the deportation of Maryland resident Kilmar Ábrego García to El Salvador due to concerns for his safety. The administration subsequently ignored this judicial order and deported Ábrego García anyway, along with more than 230 other immigrants, mostly Venezuelans and nearly half with legal status in the U.S., to the CECOT terrorist prison in El Salvador in March.

Supporting reports

• Trump invokes Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify deportations based on Venezuelan gang activity — In March 2025, the Trump administration invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798—previously used only three times in U.S. history—to claim authority to deport citizens of nations engaged in invasion or "predatory incursion." Trump contended that Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua's activities constituted an invasion justifying mass deportations. Multiple federal judges rejected this claim, with New York federal judge Alvin Hellerstein ruling in June that refugee migration and gang infiltration do not meet the law's definition of invasion or predatory incursion.

Supporting reports

• Trump issued executive order suspending Jenner & Block security clearances — In March 2025, President Trump signed an executive order titled "Addressing Risks from Jenner & Block" that suspended security clearances for lawyers at the firm and restricted their access to government buildings, officials, and federal contracting work. Trump accused the firm of engaging in activities that "undermine justice and the interests of the United States" and specifically criticized it for employing Andrew Weissmann, who had worked on the Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign.

Supporting reports

• White House issued memorandum suspending security clearances for Covington & Burling LLP members and directing contract review — The White House issued a presidential memorandum directing the Attorney General and heads of executive agencies to immediately suspend active security clearances held by Peter Koski and all members, partners, and employees of Covington & Burling LLP who assisted former Special Counsel Jack Smith, pending review of their roles in what the memorandum characterizes as "weaponization of the judicial process." The memorandum also directs agencies to terminate engagements with the firm to the maximum extent permitted by law and instructs the Office of Management and Budget to direct all agencies to review government contracts with the firm.
• White House issues fact sheet on suspension of security clearances for Covington & Burling LLP employees — The White House issued a fact sheet announcing that President Trump signed a memorandum suspending security clearances for employees of Covington & Burling LLP, including Peter Koski, who assisted former Special Counsel Jack Smith. The fact sheet states the administration will review and terminate federal contracts with the firm and evaluate all existing contracts to align with administration priorities. The document characterizes the firm's provision of legal services to Smith as "weaponization of government."

Supporting reports

• Trump issues executive order for DOJ review — On his first day back in office, Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Justice to review potential abuses of the criminal justice system over the past four years. This order led to the creation of a "weaponization working group" by Attorney General Pam Bondi. The group is tasked with examining cases that angered Trump, and its findings will be sent to Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy, Stephen Miller. The group includes officials from various DOJ offices, raising concerns about conflicts of interest due to their previous roles in related cases.

Supporting reports

• Prosecutors request dismissal of Eric Adams charges — Under pressure from the Justice Department leadership, prosecutors in Washington filed a request to dismiss the criminal corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams. The charges included bribery, fraud, and soliciting illegal foreign campaign contributions. This decision followed the resignation of seven prosecutors, including the acting US attorney for the Southern District of New York, who opposed the dismissal for political reasons. The Justice Department argued that the case impeded Adams' cooperation with immigration enforcement, despite not being based on the strength of the evidence.
• Six prosecutors resign in protest over order to dismiss charges against Eric Adams — On February 13, 2025, six prosecutors resigned in protest after Emil Bove III, the acting deputy attorney general, ordered them to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The prosecutors had previously indicted Adams on multiple counts, including bribery and campaign finance offenses, and expressed concerns that the dismissal was politically motivated.
• Six prosecutors resign over order to dismiss charges against Eric Adams — Six prosecutors resigned in protest after Emil Bove III, the acting deputy attorney general, ordered them to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The prosecutors argued that the dismissal was politically motivated and undermined the rule of law, as Adams had been indicted on serious charges including bribery and campaign finance offenses.

Supporting reports

• Interim US Attorney resigns over corruption case — Danielle Sassoon, the interim US Attorney handling the NYC Mayor Eric Adams' public corruption case, resigned after refusing to drop charges despite pressure from DOJ Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. Sassoon's resignation follows a letter to AG Pam Bondi detailing alleged unethical proposals from Adams' attorneys. Other senior US Attorneys also resigned in protest, highlighting concerns over political interference.
• US Attorney resigns over refusal to drop charges — Danielle Sassoon, the interim US Attorney in charge of the NYC Mayor Eric Adams’ public corruption case, resigned after refusing to drop the charges despite demands from DOJ Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. Sassoon wrote a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, outlining an alleged quid pro quo proposal from Adams' attorneys. Following Sassoon's resignation, senior US Attorneys in New York also refused to dismiss the case and resigned in protest. Bove, who previously served as Trump's criminal defense attorney, is involved in the case.
• DOJ pressures Public Integrity Section lawyers — DOJ leadership reportedly pressured Public Integrity Section lawyers to decide within an hour who would dismiss the indictment against NYC Mayor Eric Adams, threatening to fire all if none complied. This move has sparked resignations and widespread dismay within the legal community, reminiscent of the 1973 Saturday Night Massacre.
• Memo issued to dismiss Adams case for political reasons — A memo was issued stating that the criminal case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams was dismissed for political reasons, citing that the case restricted his ability to assist in deportation efforts. The memo admitted the decision was not based on evidence or law, raising ethical concerns about the DOJ's actions.
• Prosecutor Hagan Scotten resigns over DOJ pressure — Prosecutor Hagan Scotten resigned after refusing to dismiss a corruption case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams. Scotten's resignation letter criticized the use of prosecutorial power to influence elected officials, stating that he would not comply with such directives. His resignation follows that of co-counsel Danielle Sassoon, highlighting internal DOJ tensions over the case.

Supporting reports

• Trump signs executive order pausing FCPA enforcement — President Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Justice to pause enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which prohibits American companies from bribing foreign officials to obtain or retain business. This move could undermine efforts to prevent public corruption and maintain the rule of law in international business practices.
• Executive Order Pauses FCPA Enforcement — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14209, pausing enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) for 180 days to review guidelines and policies. The order aims to enhance American economic competitiveness and national security by reducing barriers to commerce abroad. The Attorney General is tasked with reviewing and potentially revising FCPA enforcement actions and guidelines during this period.
• Trump halts enforcement of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act — President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Justice to halt prosecutions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which bans bribery of foreign officials. The order requires the Attorney General to pause these prosecutions until new enforcement guidance is issued, aimed at promoting American competitiveness. This move has been criticized by anti-corruption groups, who argue it undermines the US's leadership in fighting global corruption. The FCPA has been instrumental in significant corporate cases, including actions against Goldman Sachs.
• Trump Pauses FCPA Enforcement — President Donald Trump issued an executive order pausing enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) for 180 days. The order directs the Attorney General to cease new FCPA investigations and review existing ones, with the possibility of extending the review period for another 180 days. The order aims to enhance American economic competitiveness and national security by reducing perceived overreach in FCPA enforcement, which Trump argues impedes U.S. foreign policy objectives.
• White House issued executive order pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement — The White House issued an executive order on February 10, 2025, directing the Attorney General to cease initiating new FCPA investigations and enforcement actions for 180 days while reviewing enforcement guidelines. The order states that FCPA enforcement "harms the interests of the United States" and "impedes" foreign policy objectives. The Attorney General is instructed to review existing investigations and issue revised guidelines prioritizing "American economic competitiveness" and "Presidential foreign policy prerogatives." The order characterizes current FCPA enforcement as "overexpansive" and claims it wastes prosecutorial resources.
• White House issues fact sheet on FCPA enforcement pause — The White House issued a fact sheet on February 10, 2025, announcing that President Trump signed an executive order directing the Attorney General to pause Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement actions and issue revised enforcement guidance. The fact sheet states that past and existing FCPA actions will be reviewed, and future investigations and enforcement must be approved by the Attorney General. The document frames the pause as necessary to restore American competitiveness and national security.
• Trump signs executive order pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act — President Trump signed an executive order pausing the enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits bribery of foreign officials. This suspension could lead to increased corruption in international business dealings.
• Trump signed executive order pausing prosecutions under Foreign Corrupt Practices Act — On February 10, 2025, Trump signed an executive order directing the DOJ to halt prosecutions of Americans accused of bribing foreign government officials. Attorney General Pam Bondi was instructed to pause prosecutions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 until she issues revised enforcement guidance promoting American competitiveness. Trump stated the action would "mean a lot more business for America." The White House claimed the law disadvantages US firms compared to foreign competitors.

Supporting reports

• Bondi launches Weaponization Working Group — Attorney General Pam Bondi launched a "Weaponization Working Group" to review prosecutions of Trump and investigate alleged prosecutorial abuse related to Jan. 6 investigations. This group aims to challenge legal actions against Trump and his allies.

Supporting reports

• SEC investigation into crypto billionaire Justin Sun placed on hold in February. — Crypto billionaire Justin Sun, who purchased $75 million in Trump coin at the dinner, had been under SEC investigation for market manipulation. That investigation was placed "on hold" in February 2025, prior to the dinner event.
• SEC halts prosecution of crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun in exchange for settlement — In February 2025, the SEC announced it was halting prosecution of crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun for fraud and market manipulation to work out a settlement. Sun had invested $75 million in World Liberty Financial tokens beginning in November 2024, directly after Trump won the 2024 presidential election. Sun's purchases resulted in a $50 million windfall for Trump and his sons. The timing and terms of the settlement halt suggest prosecutorial discretion exercised in favor of a major investor in the president's personal financial scheme.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration issues executive order imposing sanctions on ICC officials and affiliates — The Trump administration issued an executive order in February 2025 authorizing comprehensive sanctions against International Criminal Court officials, judges, and individuals and organizations assisting the ICC's investigation into Israeli crimes in Palestine. The order targeted ICC prosecutors, judges, three Palestinian human rights groups, and UN special rapporteur Francesca Albanese, effectively criminalizing collaboration with the court and restricting access to US financial and technology services.
• Executive Order to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias — President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14202, establishing a Task Force within the Department of Justice to eradicate anti-Christian bias. The Task Force, chaired by the Attorney General, includes members from various federal departments and agencies. Its functions include reviewing past anti-Christian policies, recommending remedial actions, and protecting religious liberties. The Task Force will submit reports to the President and is set to terminate in two years unless extended.
• Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14203, imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC). The order blocks property and suspends entry into the U.S. for ICC officials and their families, citing the ICC's investigations into U.S. and Israeli personnel as illegitimate. The order declares a national emergency to address the threat posed by the ICC's actions, which are seen as undermining U.S. sovereignty and national security.
• Trump Imposes Sanctions on International Criminal Court — On February 6, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC). The order blocks property and assets of ICC officials and restricts their entry into the United States. This action is in response to the ICC's investigations and arrest warrants against U.S. and Israeli personnel, which the U.S. government deems illegitimate. The order declares a national emergency to address these actions, citing threats to U.S. national security and foreign policy.
• Trump signed executive order on ICC sanctions — On February 6, 2025, Trump signed an executive order authorizing economic sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing the body of "improperly targeting" the United States and its allies, including Israel. Trump criticized the ICC for issuing warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes. The order grants Trump broad powers to impose asset freezes and travel bans against ICC staff and family members if the US determines they are involved in investigating or prosecuting US citizens and certain allies.
• Trump signed executive order imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court — President Trump signed an executive order declaring a national emergency and imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court, blocking property and assets of ICC officials and suspending their entry into the United States. The order names ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan in an annex and authorizes the Secretary of State and Treasury to identify additional ICC personnel for sanctions. The order asserts that the ICC has engaged in "illegitimate and baseless actions" by investigating U.S. and Israeli personnel and issuing arrest warrants for Israeli officials, and claims this threatens U.S. national security and sovereignty.

Supporting reports

• Trump appointee demands list of FBI agents — Emil Bove, acting deputy attorney general, demanded the names, titles, and offices of all FBI employees who worked on investigations into the January 6 Capitol riot. This request could lead to the dismissal of FBI agents involved in these investigations. The FBI Agents Association criticized the move as being fundamentally at odds with law enforcement objectives and warned it could weaken the bureau's ability to protect national security.
• Trump appointee fires January 6 prosecutors — Emil Bove, acting deputy attorney general under Donald Trump, ordered the firing of about two dozen Justice Department employees involved in the January 6 Capitol riot cases. This action was part of a broader termination of prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team who investigated Trump. The firings were executed late on a Friday, as per a memo obtained by the Associated Press. This move is seen as part of a pattern of retribution against federal employees involved in investigations related to Trump.
• Trump administration moves to fire FBI agents — The Trump administration is reportedly moving to fire FBI agents involved in investigations related to the president. This action raises concerns about potential interference in law enforcement and the independence of the FBI.
• Dismissal of Federal Prosecutors — The Trump administration fired 25 to 30 federal prosecutors who had worked on cases related to the January 6 Capitol riot. This action was ordered by acting deputy attorney general Emil Bove, further consolidating control over the Justice Department and undermining ongoing investigations into the Capitol attack.
• Purge of FBI Executives — Officials in the Trump administration purged all six top executives of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and over 20 heads of FBI field offices, including those involved in cases against Trump. Acting deputy attorney general Emil Bove requested a list of FBI agents who worked on January 6 cases to consider further personnel actions. This action is part of a broader effort to retaliate against those who held Trump accountable.
• Justice Department directive to FBI — The Justice Department issued a directive to the FBI to compile the names of bureau personnel involved in investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. This directive was followed by the announcement that eight senior executives at the FBI faced termination. The move has reportedly caused fear and anxiety within the FBI ranks, as several high-ranking officials have already been forced out since Trump's inauguration on January 20, 2025.
• Termination of FBI senior executives — The Justice Department informed FBI leadership that eight senior executives at the bureau faced termination. This decision is part of a broader pattern of removals, with at least nine high-ranking officials forced out since Trump's inauguration. The terminations have spread fear and anxiety within the FBI, as they are perceived as targeting officials who investigated the January 6 Capitol attack.
• Trump ordered firing of special counsel prosecutors — Former President Donald Trump personally ordered the firing of more than a dozen prosecutors who worked on criminal cases against him, according to sources. The firings were executed by the acting attorney general, James McHenry, following a directive from the White House presidential personnel office. This move is seen as part of Trump's effort to align the Justice Department with his political agenda, demonstrating a shift towards a unitary executive model where the department is directly answerable to the White House.
• Trump fires federal prosecutors of January 6th insurrectionists — President Trump has fired federal prosecutors who were involved in prosecuting individuals related to the January 6th insurrection. This move raises concerns about a potential broader purge within the Justice Department. The action reflects an effort to retaliate against those who pursued legal action against his supporters involved in the Capitol assault.
• Trump initiates FBI personnel purge — President Donald Trump has initiated a significant purge of FBI personnel, targeting agents and officials involved in investigations that led to criminal charges against him. This includes the firing of David Sundberg, head of the FBI's Washington Field Office, which oversees sensitive national security and counterintelligence cases. The purge could potentially involve hundreds of agents, particularly those who investigated the January 6 Capitol assault. The FBI is attempting to resist, but Trump's position as chief executive suggests he may succeed in this effort.

Supporting reports

• Trump DOJ fires prosecutors involved in investigations against him — The Department of Justice, under Acting Attorney General McHenry, terminated several career prosecutors who were involved in investigations of former President Trump. This action is framed as part of an effort to end the "weaponization of government" and aligns with Trump's agenda. The firings raise concerns about the independence of the DOJ and its role in upholding the rule of law.
• Trump administration fires DOJ lawyers in criminal cases — The Trump administration fired more than a dozen DOJ lawyers involved in two criminal cases against the president. This action raises concerns about the independence of the Justice Department and potential interference in legal proceedings.
• Trump justice department fires officials linked to Jack Smith — On January 27, 2025, Acting Attorney General James McHenry fired over a dozen federal prosecutors who had worked on criminal cases against Donald Trump. These prosecutors were part of Special Counsel Jack Smith's team, which had charged Trump in two cases related to mishandling classified documents and attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. The firings were justified by McHenry as necessary because the prosecutors could not be trusted to implement the president's agenda. This move is part of broader personnel changes within the Justice Department under the Trump administration.
• Trump fires federal prosecutors involved in his prosecutions — On January 27, Trump’s acting attorney general fired more than a dozen federal prosecutors who were involved in the criminal prosecutions against Trump. The official stated that the acting attorney general “does not trust these officials to assist in faithfully implementing the President’s agenda.”
• White House directed firing of special counsel prosecutors — The Justice Department, following instructions from the White House, fired more than a dozen federal prosecutors involved in criminal prosecutions against Donald Trump. The firings were directed by the acting Attorney General, James McHenry, and were linked to a memo from the White House personnel office. This action has raised concerns about the independence of the Justice Department and its potential use as an extension of the White House. The prosecutors were dismissed due to their roles in prosecuting Trump, which was seen as incompatible with the president's agenda.

Supporting reports

• DOJ removes database of Jan. 6 insurrectionists' charges — The Department of Justice removed a database listing the criminal charges and convictions of individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection. This action raises concerns about transparency and accountability in the handling of cases related to the insurrection.

Supporting reports

• Trump pardons January 6 rioters — President Trump commuted the sentences of or pardoned 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, including those who attacked police officers. This decision has been praised by some as ending a "prosecutorial nightmare" but criticized by others for undermining accountability for the attack on democratic institutions.
• Trump pardons Oathkeepers leader Stewart Rhodes — Former President Donald Trump pardoned Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the Oathkeepers, who was serving a 22-year sentence for seditious conspiracy related to the January 6 Capitol riot. This pardon has sparked controversy and criticism, as it is seen as undermining accountability for those involved in the insurrection. The decision has been condemned by law enforcement and political leaders who view it as a dangerous precedent.
• Trump issued executive order pardoning January 6 attackers — Former President Donald Trump issued an executive order granting pardons to individuals convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack. This move was part of his campaign promises after winning back the presidency in November. The pardons were extended to 1,500 people charged or convicted for their roles in the attack. However, some individuals, including Jason Riddle and Pamela Hemphill, have publicly rejected the pardons, citing personal responsibility and concerns about the implications of accepting clemency.
• Trump issues blanket pardons for January 6 Capitol attackers — Former President Donald Trump issued blanket pardons for approximately 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. This decision has been met with criticism from various quarters, including Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who expressed concern that such pardons could lead to further violence. Vice-President JD Vance defended the pardons, claiming they addressed a denial of due process and constitutional rights, despite evidence supporting many of the convictions. The pardons have sparked a debate on the use of presidential pardon power and its implications for justice and public safety.
• Trump issues 1,500 ‘unconditional’ pardons over January 6 Capitol attack — On the first day of his second term, Donald Trump issued 1,500 unconditional pardons to individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Among those pardoned was Matthew Huttle, who had been sentenced to six months in prison for his participation. The pardons have raised concerns among law enforcement and political violence experts about potential future acts of violence. The pardons were part of a broader move by Trump to absolve those who supported his claims of election fraud.