Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Apr 14, 2026 DOJ moved to vacate seditious conspiracy convictions of January 6 defendants Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Erasing convictions for an attack on the Capitol removes legal consequences and rewrites the accountability record for an assault on democratic transfer of power.
Supporting reports
- DOJ files motions to vacate January 6 seditious conspiracy convictions — The US Department of Justice, under Trump-appointed US Attorney Jeanine Pirro, filed motions on April 15, 2026, to overturn seditious conspiracy convictions of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers members convicted for their roles in the January 6, 2021 Capitol siege. The filing targets convictions of leaders including Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, and Stewart Rhodes. This action follows Trump's January 2025 mass pardons and commutations of roughly 1,600 Capitol-related defendants, including Enrique Tarrio, who had been sentenced to 22 years. The filing would erase convictions from defendants' records.
- Department of Justice moved to dismiss seditious conspiracy convictions of January 6 defendants — The Department of Justice filed a motion to vacate the seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys members convicted for their roles in the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Lenerz wrote that "The United States has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice." This action follows Trump's January 2025 pardons and sentence commutations of January 6 participants, effectively erasing accountability for convictions related to the attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
- DOJ seeks to dismiss Oath Keepers and Proud Boys Jan. 6 convictions — Trump's Justice Department filed a motion with a federal appeals court to dismiss seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys members charged for their roles in the January 6 insurrection. The defendants had previously received sentence commutations on Trump's first day in office but were not among the 1,200+ individuals pardoned for January 6-related crimes.
Jan 20, 2026 Trump threatened to sue and criminally prosecute pollsters over an unfavorable approval rating survey Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
The president called for treating unfavorable polling as a criminal offense and expanded a defamation suit against the New York Times, an attempt to intimidate independent measurement of public opinion.
Supporting reports
- Claimed Civil Rights Act harmed white people — In a New York Times interview, Trump claimed that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 led to white people being "very badly treated."
- Trump announces expansion of defamation lawsuit against New York Times over unfavorable poll — President Donald Trump announced via Truth Social that he is expanding his existing defamation lawsuit against the New York Times to include claims related to a Times/Siena University poll showing his approval rating at 40%. Trump alleged the poll was "heavily skewed toward Democrats" and "fake results," and instructed his lawyers to demand the Times preserve records of how the poll was "computed." The Times responded by defending its polling methodology as rigorous and independent of political favorability.
- Trump threatened legal action against polling organizations over unfavorable poll — Following release of a New York Times/Siena poll showing Trump with 40% job approval and 56% disapproval across multiple policy areas, Trump posted three lengthy posts on Truth Social threatening to sue the Times and prosecute polling companies criminally. Trump claimed the polls were "fake" and "tremendously negative," and stated his lawyers had demanded the Times preserve records of how results were "computed."
- Trump delivers address at World Economic Forum in Davos with multiple false and exaggerated claims — Donald Trump addressed the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 22, 2026, making numerous claims about foreign policy achievements, technological leadership, renewable energy, NATO support, and budget matters. Fact-checkers found the claims ranged from exaggerated to provably false, including assertions about settling eight wars, leading China in AI, China's wind capacity, NATO allies' commitment, and the US ownership of Greenland. The speech exemplified a pattern of dubious assertions presented as fact to an international audience.
- Trump threatened to criminalize polling and sued New York Times — After the New York Times/Siena poll was released showing his approval at 40%, Trump's social media account posted that "Fake and Fraudulent Polling should be, virtually, a criminal offense" and claimed polls during the 2020 election were knowingly wrong and designed to influence the outcome. Trump announced he would add the Times/Siena poll to an existing lawsuit against the New York Times, threatening legal action against the news organization for publishing polling data.
- Trump threatened to sue New York Times over approval rating poll — Trump spent the morning lashing out at the press and threatened to sue The New York Times over its latest Siena poll, which shows his approval rating deeply underwater. Trump labeled the poll fake, accused the paper of fraud, and demanded internal records. The poll showed Trump with a net approval of minus sixteen and underwater on nearly every major issue, from the economy to foreign relations to immigration.
- Trump continues to repost conspiracy theories about 2020 election — Trump is still reposting conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, including content from QAnon-linked accounts. Many lawyers who pushed these lies lost their licenses, but the damage to the information environment remains.
Jan 10, 2026 Trump falsely claimed he won Minnesota in three consecutive elections Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
The president spread demonstrably false electoral claims and made inflammatory ethnic stereotypes to justify withholding federal cooperation from a state.
Supporting reports
- Trump claims he won Minnesota three times without evidence — When asked by CNN's Kaitlan Collins whether the FBI should share information about the Renee Good shooting with state officials, President Trump responded with unsubstantiated claims that Minnesota is corrupt and that he won the state in 2016, 2020, and 2024. Trump lost Minnesota in all three elections. He also made inflammatory statements about Somali-Americans, claiming they "buy their vote" and alleging widespread fraud without evidence.
Dec 28, 2025 Trump dismissed documented Russian 2016 election interference as a hoax invented by political opponents Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Denying established findings of foreign election interference undermines public understanding of electoral security threats and past sanctions justification.
Supporting reports
- Trump dismissed Russian interference in 2016 election as a hoax — Trump told reporters that the Russian interference in the 2016 election was a "made-up hoax" created by Hillary Clinton and Adam Schiff. He claimed that he and Putin had discussed the matter and agreed that "they made it all up." Trump stated that despite the alleged hoax, "we didn't get into wars, or we didn't get into problems," and lamented that trade with Russia had been restricted as a result.
Nov 24, 2025 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. personally ordered the CDC to alter website language on the vaccine-autism link Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
A cabinet secretary directed federal health guidance to be reframed against established scientific consensus, undermining agency independence and public health messaging.
Supporting reports
- CDC website altered to undermine vaccine-autism consensus — The CDC website statement that vaccines do not cause autism was modified to include an asterisk and footnote indicating it had not been removed because of Kennedy's promise to Senator Cassidy, and the page text was changed to state that "studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities." This alteration, made at Kennedy's direction, effectively reframed the scientific consensus as disputed and suggested institutional suppression of contrary evidence.
- RFK Jr. personally ordered CDC to alter vaccine-autism guidance — Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. personally directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to change information on the CDC website regarding the claim that vaccines do not cause autism. Kennedy acknowledged the order despite admitting that studies have shown no link between vaccines and autism. He stated he wanted the change because additional studies remain to be done, effectively reframing established scientific consensus as unproven. The change was made despite Kennedy's prior promise to Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) during his confirmation process that he would not remove the statement.
Oct 8, 2025 White House held an 'Antifa Roundtable' with conspiracy theorists and issued a false press release calling Portland protests 'Antifa-led hellfire' Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Official events and communications promoted a false narrative about protest violence, contradicting agents' own descriptions of 'low energy' demonstrations, to justify military deployment.
Supporting reports
- Trump held antifa roundtable with conspiracy theorists — Trump held an "antifa" roundtable with right-wing commentators, including "Pizzagate" conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec. Talking about his effort to criminalize flag burning, a move protected by the First Amendment through the Supreme Court, Trump said, "We took freedom of speech away." Attorney General Pam Bondi noted that, "just like we did with cartels, we're going to take the same approach with antifa." Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem compared "antifa," which has no organized structure or leadership, to Tren de Aragua, MS-13, Hamas, and ISIS, saying they are "just as sophisticated" and "dangerous" as other "terrorist" organizations.
- White House issues release characterizing Portland protests as "Antifa-led" terrorism and promoting federal deployment — The White House published a release titled "PORTLAND: Fake News Ignores Antifa Violence, Residents' Pleas for Help" on October 8, 2025. The document characterizes years of Portland protests as an "Antifa-led hellfire" involving "firebombs, beatings, and brazen attacks," accuses news media of denial about "Radical Left's reign of terror," and frames federal resource mobilization as necessary to "safeguard lives and property." The release includes resident testimonies supporting National Guard deployment and a chronology of Portland incidents dating to 2016, attributing violence to "Antifa terrorists" and "Antifa militants."
- White House held "Antifa Roundtable" with far-right influencers to promote narrative of left-wing violence — Trump held an "Antifa Roundtable" at the White House with far-right influencers to promote the narrative that "antifa" is a real organized threat responsible for violence and destruction. Participants included Jack Posobiec, a proponent of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory. The White House used the event to advance claims about left-wing terrorism despite evidence that federal agents had characterized pre-deployment protests as "low energy."
- White House issued press release falsely characterizing Portland protests as "Antifa-led hellfire" — The White House issued a press release claiming that Portland has been consumed for years by an "Antifa-led hellfire" of firebombs, beatings, and attacks on federal officers and property, and accused the media of "shameful denial" about left-wing violence. The characterization contradicted federal agents' own descriptions of the protests as "low energy" before the administration ordered troops into the city.
Oct 5, 2025 Kristi Noem made unverified claims that Chicago and Portland were dangerous, contradicted by state officials and police records Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
A cabinet secretary's public claims about major US cities were disputed by local officials and internal police reports showing low-level activity, undermining factual governance.
Supporting reports
- Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem made false claims about Portland — Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem stated on Fox News that she is "saving Chicago and Portland," claiming "Portland, it's been dark and horrible for so many years. It been a train wreck." She asserted that "Gangs, cartel members, and known terrorist organizations have placed bounties on the heads of several of our law enforcement officers." The bulletin notes Noem has never visited Portland and bases her statements on Fox propaganda rather than direct knowledge or evidence.
- Illinois Governor Pritzker contradicted federal claims about Chicago — Illinois Governor JB Pritzker stated on CNN that Trump and Homeland Security claims that Chicago is a "war zone" are false. Pritzker said: "They're just making this up. And then what do they do? They fire tear gas and smoke grenades, and they make it look like it's a war zone." Pritzker also reported that ICE is "just picking up people who are brown and black and then checking their credentials," resulting in U.S. citizens being detained and arrested without proper documentation checks.
- Kristi Noem claimed Portland officials lied about city safety during her visit — During a cabinet meeting, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem stated that during a visit to Portland on Tuesday, she met with the governor, mayor, and police chief, all of whom she characterized as "lying" and "dishonest." She claimed the mayor said Portland was safe and beautiful, but that streets were cleared and a four-block radius was secured for her visit. The Wall Street Journal reported that Portland police daily reports from the month prior painted a different picture, with one sergeant noting on September 5 that only 8 people were present at a demonstration and "couldn't even get one of them to flip me the bird. Very low energy."
Jul 23, 2025 Department of Homeland Security posted a manifest-destiny-era painting with a caption invoking heritage and homeland defense Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
An official agency account promoted ancestry-based national identity imagery, echoing exclusionary historical narratives.
Supporting reports
- Department of Homeland Security posted image of "American Progress" painting with caption evoking manifest destiny ideology — On July 23, the official X account of the Department of Homeland Security posted John Gast's 1872 oil painting "American Progress"—a canonical representation of manifest destiny depicting westward expansion, Indigenous displacement, and white settlement—with the caption "A Heritage to be proud of, a Homeland worth Defending." The post was interpreted by observers as the Trump administration's embrace of manifest destiny ideology and, more broadly, "blood and soil" citizenship doctrine that defines belonging by ancestry and racial continuity rather than civic principles.
Jul 8, 2025 Trump dismissed Epstein-related documents as fabrications by political opponents and urged supporters to ignore them Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
Reframing investigative material as partisan fabrication discourages public scrutiny of matters potentially touching the president.
Supporting reports
- Trump claims Epstein files are fabrications by political opponents and discourages public interest — On July 8, after sustained criticism from his MAGA base over the administration's handling of Epstein-related disclosures, Trump dismissed the controversy as a "desecration" of flood victims. When criticism persisted, Trump posted on Truth Social claiming that additional Epstein files exist but were "written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration." He urged supporters to "not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about." This statement contradicted the administration's earlier promise to release such files and reframed legitimate investigative material as partisan fabrication.
Jun 27, 2025 Trump fabricated a historical narrative about the Fourteenth Amendment's origins to justify ending birthright citizenship Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Inventing a false account of constitutional history to support eliminating a citizenship right misrepresents settled law to the public.
Supporting reports
- Trump announces plan to end birthright citizenship via executive order — Following the Supreme Court's Trump v. CASA decision, President Trump announced to reporters his intention to use an executive order to end birthright citizenship, claiming the Fourteenth Amendment was based on a misinterpretation of law and rooted in a fabricated historical narrative about the Civil War ending in 1869 and a case filed on that exact day concerning "babies of slaves."
Jun 10, 2025 The Department of Defense removed books and DEI-related materials from military academies and schools and banned pride flags in some government spaces Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
The removals and bans used state authority to restrict what could be read, taught, and displayed in official institutions.
Supporting reports
- Department of Defense bans books from Naval Academy — The Department of Defense ordered the removal of nearly 400 books from the U.S. Naval Academy library, targeting works related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Although some books have been returned, the action reflects a broader effort to control educational content in military institutions.
- Department of Defense bans DEI-related books and instruction — The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) instructed schools to remove books and cancel activities related to gender ideology and DEI. This directive, part of compliance with executive orders, has led to legal challenges from students claiming First Amendment violations.
- Departments of Veterans Affairs and State ban pride flags — The Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Department of State have banned the display of pride flags and similar symbols in employees' private offices and consular posts. This action reflects the administration's stance against LGBTQ+ visibility in government spaces.
Mar 27, 2025 Trump signed an executive order directing removal of "improper, divisive, or anti-American ideology" from the Smithsonian Institution and restoring pre-2020 Confederate monuments Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
An executive order asserted federal control over museum content and public monuments, directing the vice president to curate historical exhibits according to administration ideology.
Supporting reports
- Trump issues executive order directing Smithsonian reshaping and ideological content removal — President Trump issued an executive order on March 27, 2025, directing Vice President JD Vance to remove what the administration deems "improper, divisive, or anti-American ideology" from the Smithsonian Institution's museums, education centers, research facilities, and the National Zoo. The order specifically targets exhibits addressing race and American history, directs the American Women's History Museum to exclude transgender recognition, mandates appointment of new board members aligned with the order's policy, and instructs the Secretary of the Interior to restore Confederate-era statues and memorials removed in the past five years. The order frames these actions as correcting a "concerted and widespread" effort to rewrite U.S. history.
- Trump issued executive order "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" directing federal historic sites to align with administration ideology — On March 27, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," asserting that the nation's history had been rewritten by ideology rather than fact. The order directed the Secretary of the Interior to review federal monuments, memorials, and statues removed or altered since January 1, 2020, and restore them to ensure they do not "inappropriately disparage Americans" and instead focus on "the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people." The order also targeted the Smithsonian Institution, directing a three-person review team to examine museum exhibitions and ensure they align with the president's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism and remove divisive narratives.
- Trump executive order targets DEI programs at federal cultural institutions — An executive order issued on March 27, 2025, directs federal action against diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, with specific targeting of the African American History Museum and the Kennedy Center. The order aims to eliminate or redirect DEI-related funding and operations at these institutions.
- Trump signed executive order directing removal of exhibits and narratives from federal historical sites and museums — President Trump signed Executive Order 14253 on March 27, 2025, directing federal agencies to remove what the order characterizes as "ideological" content from the Smithsonian Institution, Independence National Historical Park, and other Interior Department historical sites. The order instructs the Vice President to work through his Smithsonian Board seat to "remove improper ideology" from exhibits and programs; directs the Secretary of the Interior to reinstate pre-2020 monuments and ensure descriptions do not "inappropriately disparage Americans"; and mandates that future congressional appropriations to the Smithsonian prohibit exhibits that "divide Americans based on race" or conflict with federal policy. The order names specific current exhibits as examples of objectionable content.
- Trump signed Executive Order 14253 directing removal of exhibits and narratives from federal museums and historical sites deemed ideologically divisive, with authority delegated to the Vice President over the Smithsonian Institution. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14253 on March 27, 2025, directing federal agencies to remove exhibits, programs, and historical narratives from museums and monuments that the order characterizes as "divisive" or promoting "ideology" rather than "objective facts." The order specifically targets the Smithsonian Institution, directing the Vice President to work through his role on the Smithsonian Board of Regents to remove what the order calls "improper ideology." It instructs the Secretary of the Interior to audit and reinstate pre-2020 monuments and ensure all federal historical sites focus on "greatness" and "achievements" rather than narratives the order deems disparaging. Future appropriations are to be conditioned on prohibiting exhibits that "divide Americans based on race" or are "inconsistent with Federal law and policy."
- Trump issues executive order directing federal agencies to remove "ideological" content from Smithsonian Institution and federal historical sites — President Trump signed an executive order on March 27, 2025, directing the Vice President, OMB Director, and Secretary of the Interior to remove what the order characterizes as "divisive, race-centered ideology" from the Smithsonian Institution, Independence National Historical Park, and other federal historical sites. The order mandates restoration of pre-2020 monuments and memorials, prohibits future federal funding for exhibits deemed to "degrade shared American values" or "divide Americans based on race," and requires the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum to exclude recognition of transgender athletes. The order frames this as restoring "truth" and "sanity" to American history.
- White House issued fact sheet promoting executive order on Smithsonian and federal historical sites — The White House published a fact sheet on March 27, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump directing the Vice President to eliminate what the order characterizes as "improper, divisive, or anti-American ideology" from the Smithsonian Institution and its museums. The order directs the Secretary of the Interior to restore federal parks, monuments, and memorials altered in the prior five years, and instructs Congress to condition future Smithsonian appropriations on prohibiting exhibits that "degrade shared American values" or "divide Americans by race." The fact sheet asserts that prior administrations promoted "divisive ideology" and cites specific Smithsonian exhibits as examples.
- Trump administration issues executive order targeting Smithsonian Institution exhibits on race and American history — On Thursday, March 28, 2025, the Trump administration announced an executive order titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" that orders a large reshaping of the Smithsonian Institution to eliminate what Trump described as "improper, divisive or anti-American ideology." The order specifically criticized the Smithsonian American Art Museum's exhibit "The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture" and the National Museum of African American History and Culture. Vice President JD Vance was ordered to "remove improper ideology" from Smithsonian museums and educational centers. Artists, academics, and civil rights figures have condemned the order as an attempt to censor and erase Black history and diverse perspectives from public institutions.
- Trump signs executive order on American history curriculum — Trump signed an executive order titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" directing Vice President J.D. Vance, in his capacity as a member of the Smithsonian Board of Regents, to work to eliminate "improper, divisive, or anti-American ideology" from the Smithsonian Institution, its museums, education and research centers, and the National Zoo. The order represents an attempt to reshape how Americans understand and learn their history.
- Trump signs executive order suspending security clearances for law firms representing Democratic clients — Trump signed executive orders suspending security clearances for law firms that represent Democratic clients and barring the federal government from hiring employees from those firms. The orders target legal representation based on client political affiliation, creating a mechanism to exclude attorneys from federal employment based on their professional representation.
- Trump administration challenges judges and undermines judicial credibility — The Trump administration has challenged judges who have ruled against Trump and worked to destroy public faith in the courts. The effort represents a systematic campaign to delegitimize judicial authority when it conflicts with administration preferences.