Trump Action Archive

A searchable record of documented actions, compiled weekly from public sources.

4 events matching

Export CSVResearcher JSONAnalyst Newest first · Oldest first
Filtering Week: Week 55 × Attack target: Public Memory × Clear all ☆ Save this search
Tier 1 carried by a primary record Corroborated 2+ independent news desks Every result is verified and democracy-related.

Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions

Feb 1, 2026 National Park Service removed transgender references from the Stonewall National Monument website Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent

A federal agency erased historical acknowledgment of trans leadership in the queer rights movement from official monument materials.

Independently corroborated by4 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Trump administration removes transgender references from Stonewall monument website — After Donald Trump's inauguration in early 2026, the National Park Service removed references to transgender people from the Stonewall National Monument's website, effectively erasing history given that Black trans women were among the leaders of the queer rights uprising that the monument commemorates. This action preceded the removal of the Progress Pride flag and represents part of a broader pattern of historical erasure.
Verified: Corroborated — 2+ independent news desks Week 55 – 2026-01-31–2026-02-06 wk55_CR_021
Feb 1, 2026 Trump administration removed a historical slavery exhibit from a national park Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation

Officials erased public acknowledgment of enslaved people at a founding-era site, following a directive to promote a more celebratory national narrative.

Primary sourceA record that carries the claim alone
Independently corroborated by2 independent news desks

Supporting reports

  • Trump administration removed slavery exhibit from Independence National Historical Park — On February 1, 2026, government officials under the Trump administration removed an exhibit on enslavement from Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia. The exhibit had acknowledged nine people enslaved at the President's House Site during George Washington's residence there and examined "the paradox between slavery and freedom in the founding of the nation." The removal followed Trump's March 2025 order directing national historic sites to "focus on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people" and calling out the park for promoting "corrosive ideology" and teaching that "America is purportedly racist."
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 55 – 2026-01-31–2026-02-06 wk55_IM_005
Feb 1, 2026 CBP began easement talks and border wall construction planning through Big Bend national and state parks Corroborated Power and Authority

Federal agencies moved to build a border barrier through protected parkland, later waiving environmental and historic laws to speed the project.

Independently corroborated by1 independent news desk
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • CBP initiates easement discussions with Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for border wall access — CBP began discussions with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in February to obtain easement rights at three parks, including Big Bend Ranch State Park. The agency later informed TPWD in March that the plans had been put on hold, according to records obtained by Inside Climate News.
  • CBP notifies Big Bend landowners of border wall construction plans — In late February/early March 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection sent letters to landowners in the Big Bend region, including Yolanda Alvarado and Raymond Skiles, notifying them that their properties had been identified for border wall construction. Skiles received a detailed 12-page letter outlining plans for a physical barrier across his property in Langtry, Texas. The notifications triggered immediate anxiety and uncertainty among residents, many of whom had received no prior public consultation or opportunity for input.
  • CBP updates border wall map to include steel bollard wall through Big Bend parks — Customs and Border Protection updated its online map to show plans for a steel bollard wall through portions of Big Bend National Park and Big Bend Ranch State Park. The same month, then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem waived environmental and historic protection laws to accelerate wall construction through CBP's Big Bend sector, a 500-mile stretch of the U.S.-Mexico border in west Texas.
  • Trump administration fast-tracks border wall construction through Big Bend National Park and surrounding lands in Texas — The Trump administration is accelerating border wall construction in the Big Bend region of west Texas, including through Big Bend National Park and Big Bend Ranch State Park. In February 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) updated its Smart Wall Map to designate a "primary border wall system" within these protected areas. Fisher Sand and Gravel was awarded a $1.2 billion contract to build 70–80 miles of wall. Construction activity has begun: roads are being widened, survey stakes placed, environmental laws waived, and landowners notified. Though CBP quietly changed the national park designation from physical barrier to "detection technology" in early March, construction continues across the region with no formal public statement or congressional approval process.
  • DHS waives environmental and historic preservation laws for Big Bend National Park border wall construction — In February 2026, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem waived federal laws related to wildlife protection, historic preservation, and environmental protection to construct a border wall through Big Bend National Park in Texas. The park, larger than Rhode Island, receives only about 1 percent of unauthorized border crossings. The federal government has allotted $1.72 billion for the project, which will include steel walls, hundreds of miles of new roads, and vehicle barriers. Local officials and former park staff have characterized the project as unnecessary and a violation of the agreement under which the park was established.
Verified: Corroborated — 2+ independent news desks Week 55 – 2026-01-31–2026-02-06 wk55_PA_008
Jan 31, 2026 Trump administration proposed a 250-foot golden monument arch in Washington, D.C. Tier 1 · Primary Power and Authority

Officials advanced a grandiose monument project compared to structures planned by Hitler, raising concern about presidential self-monumentalizing with public resources.

Independently corroborated by4 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Trump proposed 250-foot "Golden Arch" monument in Washington D.C. — Trump administration proposed constructing a 250-foot "Golden Arch" in Washington D.C. to mark America's 250th anniversary. According to the Washington Post, the structure would tower over existing memorials, alter the skyline, and block views of the Lincoln Memorial. Experts warned it is wildly out of scale. The proposed arch would be the second-largest triumphal arch ever designed, surpassed only by a massive arch Adolf Hitler planned for Berlin but never built.
  • Trump proposed 250-foot Arc de Triomphe in Washington DC — Trump told reporters he is considering building an arc in Washington DC similar to the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, stating "We're the only major city doesn't have one" and "I'd like it to be the biggest one of all. We're the biggest, most powerful nation. I'd like it to be the biggest one."
  • Trump administration pursuing vanity projects while cutting essential services — The Trump administration is pursuing grandiose aesthetic projects including renaming federal properties, adding gold fixtures to the White House, and building a 250-foot "Arc de Trump" near the Lincoln Memorial modeled after the Napoleonic arch in Paris. Republican senators Roger Wicker, Thom Tillis, and Lisa Murkowski expressed concern that these vanity projects distract from addressing the needs of struggling Americans, high prices, and healthcare funding. Senator Ron Johnson defended the projects as appropriate for a "builder."
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 55 – 2026-01-31–2026-02-06 wk55_PA_007