Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• HSI considered undercover operations against voter registration groups — According to internal documents, Homeland Security Investigations considered deploying undercover agents to investigate voter registration organizations, with Pennsylvania and New Jersey as priority targets. The stated goal was for undercover agents to engage with organizations to "substantiate recruitment methods and activities related to illegal alien voter registration," gather evidence, disrupt activities, trace financial backing, and ultimately "initiate prosecutions and dismantle illicit facilitation networks." It remains unclear whether undercover operations were actually conducted.
• HSI investigated over 150 voter registration organizations — Homeland Security Investigations conducted investigations into over 150 organizations suspected of facilitating unlawful noncitizen voter registration. For the vast majority, HSI found no derogatory information. Twenty-six organizations remain under review, and two were flagged for further investigation in Pennsylvania: the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Zumiez, a skateboard and clothing retailer. HSI also investigated Black Fork Strategies, a progressive Ohio voter engagement firm, in coordination with the FBI.
• DHS documents reveal election denier Heather Honey's role in noncitizen voting investigation — Internal Department of Homeland Security documents obtained by Popular Information reveal that election denier Heather Honey is playing a prominent role in DHS efforts to find evidence of noncitizen voting ahead of midterm elections. The documents detail DHS investigations into nonprofit voter registration organizations and outline plans for potential undercover operations targeting these groups. The revelation raises questions about whether election-fraud investigations are being driven by ideological commitments rather than evidence of actual violations.

Supporting reports

• ICE collected tens of millions of voter records for deportation targeting — Immigration and Customs Enforcement, under direction of Deputy Assistant Secretary Heather Honey, collected approximately 48.4 million voter records through undisclosed "independent sources" and obtained an additional 50.6 million records from the Department of Justice. Records from ten states—Texas, Pennsylvania, California, New Jersey, Minnesota, Michigan, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, and Ohio—were prioritized. The data was sent to HSI's Innovation Lab and is pending entry into Palantir's ELITE system, used to identify and locate people for deportation. This effort targets noncitizen voters, though noncitizen voting is extremely rare.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed: Electronic Privacy Information Center v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al. (D. Md.) — Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland challenging Executive Order 14399 and a Department of Homeland Security implementation memorandum directing creation of "State Citizenship Lists" derived from federal citizenship, naturalization, Social Security, and other databases to be sent to state election officials. EPIC alleges the collection, disclosure, and consolidation of members' sensitive personal information—including Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and citizenship status—without consent violates the Privacy Act, Administrative Procedure Act, and constitutional provisions including separation of powers and the Elections Clause. EPIC contends the data is unreliable and risks eligible voters being misidentified as non-citizens and purged from voter rolls. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief, vacation of the lists, deletion of data, and injunctive relief against further disclosure or use.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration demands TANF recipient data from 24 states for immigration enforcement — Twenty-four states sued to block the Trump administration from obtaining personal records of families enrolled in Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), a $16 billion annual program providing food, rent, and child care assistance. The administration seeks citizenship and immigration status verification data; California Attorney General Rob Bonta characterized the effort as exploiting a child-welfare program to fuel government surveillance. The administration argues the data collection is necessary to verify program eligibility.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — State of New York v. Administration for Children and Families (D.D.C. 1:26-cv-02726) — New York and 24 other states plus the District of Columbia filed a complaint challenging a System of Records Notice (SORN) issued by the Administration for Children and Families on June 23, 2026. The SORN authorizes disclosure of TANF recipients' Social Security numbers, immigration status, marital status, and other personal information to the Department of Homeland Security and other entities. Plaintiffs allege the SORN exceeds statutory authority, violates confidentiality protections, was adopted without required Privacy Act procedures, and imposes an unforeseeable condition on states' receipt of TANF funds. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief and vacatur of the SORN.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court allows Texas to enforce law requiring age verification and parental consent on apps — The Supreme Court has permitted Texas to enforce a new law that mandates age verification and parental consent for minors using certain applications. This decision allows the state to implement measures aimed at protecting children online, but it also raises concerns about privacy and access to digital platforms. The ruling is significant as it sets a precedent for other states considering similar legislation and impacts the balance between state regulation and individual rights in the digital age.

Supporting reports

• National Design Studio installs undisclosed visitor-tracking software on federal websites — The National Design Studio (NDS), a White House office led by Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia and staffed by Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) veterans, rebuilt sensitive federal websites for passport applications, voter registration, prescription-drug pricing, and children's savings accounts. The NDS installed commercial visitor-tracking software (PostHog) configured to evade privacy tools on four public federal websites without publishing required privacy impact assessments or system-of-records notices mandated by the Privacy Act of 1974 and E-Government Act of 2002. The NDS removed the tracking software after Guardian inquiry on 4 June; White House responded 17 June claiming compliance with legal requirements.

Supporting reports

• National Design Studio installs undisclosed visitor-tracking software on federal websites — The National Design Studio (NDS), a White House office led by Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia and staffed by Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) veterans, rebuilt sensitive federal websites for passport applications, voter registration, prescription-drug pricing, and children's savings accounts. The NDS installed commercial visitor-tracking software (PostHog) configured to evade privacy tools on four public federal websites without publishing required privacy impact assessments or system-of-records notices mandated by the Privacy Act of 1974 and E-Government Act of 2002. The NDS removed the tracking software after Guardian inquiry on 4 June; White House responded 17 June claiming compliance with legal requirements.
• White House National Design Studio rebuilt federal websites outside normal oversight — An investigation by The Guardian found that an opaque White House office called the National Design Studio, staffed largely by veterans of Elon Musk's DOGE and led by Trump-aligned Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia, has quietly rebuilt some of the federal government's most sensitive websites for passport applications, voter registration, prescription-drug pricing, and children's savings accounts. The office, established by Trump executive order in August 2025, has built and operates four public federal websites: ndstudio.gov, trumprx.gov, realfood.gov, and trumpaccounts.gov. All four sites run commercial visitor-tracking software configured to evade privacy tools, and none carry the public filings required under the Privacy Act of 1974 and the E-Government Act of 2002. The sites route sensitive interactions between Americans and their government through infrastructure apparently controlled by the White House and outside normal reporting and accountability systems.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge declined to certify nationwide class action on transgender medical records — On June 12, a federal judge in Maryland declined to certify a nationwide class action that would have barred the Justice Department from pressuring hospitals across the country to hand over medical records of transgender minors. Eleven families had sought the order after DOJ sent subpoenas to more than 20 major medical systems demanding records of patients who received gender-affirming care. However, the same judge had quashed DOJ's subpoena to Children's National Hospital in January, calling it a fishing expedition with no purpose other than to intimidate and harass. Courts in Boston, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Colorado have thrown out similar subpoenas, and no reported federal decision has ruled in the government's favor on these demands.

Supporting reports

• Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel drops trespassing charges against Gaza protest student after media exposure — Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel dismissed trespassing charges against Josiah Walker that stemmed from a May 2024 incident at a University of Michigan Gaza encampment raid. The lawsuit alleges the charges relied on a falsified trespassing report and that Nessel was encouraged to prosecute by U-M leadership with pro-Israel bias. Nessel also declined to file a resisting arrest charge after Walker was tackled and arrested at a September 2024 campus festival. The dismissal followed Guardian reporting exposing Nessel's connections to U-M leadership and defense attorney calls for a hearing into potential bias.
• University of Michigan student files federal lawsuit alleging surveillance, false prosecution, and constitutional violations tied to Gaza protest activities — Josiah Walker, a University of Michigan student and leader in Students Allied For Freedom and Equality, filed a federal lawsuit against the university and private investigators alleging a coordinated campaign of undercover surveillance, falsified police reports, illegal stalking, assault, property seizure, and malicious prosecution in 2024–2025. The suit claims the university hired dozens of undercover investigators to surveil pro-Palestinian students, that police manipulated documents to obtain warrants for email and Google Drive access, and that Walker was falsely arrested and imprisoned on trespassing charges. Walker alleges violations of First Amendment free speech rights, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment privacy and due process protections, and seeks monetary and punitive damages.

Supporting reports

• Section 702 FISA reauthorization deadline — Thursday, April 30 is the deadline for the short-term extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Trump signed a temporary extension through April 30 after longer renewal efforts collapsed, setting up another congressional fight over surveillance powers. Critics seek warrant requirements before authorities can access Americans' emails, calls, or texts. Advocacy groups including 5 Calls and the Brennan Center are mobilizing public contact to members of Congress opposing extension without warrant protections.
• House Votes to Reauthorize FISA Section 702 — The U.S. House of Representatives voted to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). This section allows the government to conduct surveillance on foreign targets outside the United States. The reauthorization is a significant legislative action concerning national security and privacy rights.
• Became Law: FISA Amendments Act Extension (Public Law 119-87) — Congress enacted Public Law 119-87, amending the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend Title VII authorities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. The law reauthorizes surveillance powers governing bulk collection and targeting of foreign intelligence subjects. The extension preserves existing legal frameworks for electronic surveillance without stated modifications to oversight or transparency mechanisms.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed: Common Cause v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C. 1:26-cv-01352) — Common Cause, the Common Cause Education Fund, and four individual registered voters in Texas and Nebraska filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the Justice Department's policy of demanding unredacted statewide voter registration lists from nearly every state and the District of Columbia for compilation in a national voter registration system. The complaint alleges that the policy, issued pursuant to President Trump's March 25, 2025 Executive Order 14248, exceeds DOJ's statutory authority, violates the Elections Clause and Voter Qualifications Clause, and breaches the Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief, vacatur, injunctive relief halting DOJ's data compilation and disclosure, and an order requiring deletion of already-collected data.

Supporting reports

• Electronic Frontier Foundation documented Flock data searches targeting protest activity and abortion-related investigations. — EFF analysis of more than 12 million Flock searches logged by more than 3,900 agencies between December 2024 and October 2025 identified searches tied to February 2025 50501 protests, April 2025 Hands Off protests, and June and October 2025 No Kings protests. In Texas, law enforcement searched 83,345 cameras across 6,809 networks as part of an abortion investigation with the search reason logged as "had an abortion, search for female." In California, cities including Mountain View and Santa Cruz discovered broader out-of-state and federal access than authorized and canceled contracts as a result.

Supporting reports

• Trump directs federal agencies to cease use of Anthropic technology — President Trump issued a directive ordering all federal agencies to immediately stop using Anthropic's AI technology, escalating a dispute with the company over AI safety guardrails. The Department of Defense had demanded Anthropic loosen ethical guidelines restricting mass surveillance and autonomous weapons; Anthropic refused. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth designated Anthropic a supply-chain national security risk, barring military contractors from working with the company. The GSA terminated its contracts with Anthropic. OpenAI announced a competing Pentagon deal while maintaining the same safety principles Anthropic had insisted upon.
• Trump administration cut off Anthropic from all government contracts — The Trump administration declared that AI company Anthropic would be cut off from all government contracts after the company refused to allow its technology to be used for domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth labeled Anthropic a "supply chain risk to national security." The administration ordered all government agencies to "immediately cease" using Anthropic's technology. The move appeared to put Anthropic on course to lose billions of dollars in potential revenue. Anthropic said it would challenge Hegseth's designation in court. Anthropic's conversational assistant Claude was being deployed or tested in at least 5 government agencies, including the Pentagon, HHS, DHS, and the Department of Energy.
• Trump administration imposed sweeping ban on military contractors doing business with Anthropic — The Trump administration asserted that all companies doing business with the US military are now prohibited from conducting any commercial activity with Anthropic. Although the legal basis for the sweeping ban was unclear, it could have disastrous consequences for Anthropic, which has received billions of dollars in investment from partners like Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia that also supply the military. AI researcher Steven Feldstein stated that "It isn't legally sufficient to simply proclaim or label a supply chain risk and have this be the final word. It's a major overreach."

Supporting reports

• Pentagon reportedly considering severing ties with AI company Anthropic over surveillance limits — Reporting indicates the Pentagon may sever ties with AI company Anthropic because the company sought limits on use of its technology for domestic surveillance of Americans. A senior Pentagon official acknowledged the move would be difficult to implement but suggested it was being pursued because Anthropic resisted allowing its systems to be used for domestic spying.

Supporting reports

• DOJ established controlled in-person review system for congressional Epstein files access — The Department of Justice opened an in-person review facility in Washington on February 9, 2026, allowing members of Congress to search unredacted Epstein records under tight controls on access and note-taking. This was the sole mechanism established for congressional review of unredacted files following passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act in late 2025, which required DOJ to release unclassified Epstein-related records. The DOJ controlled all variables of the review process, including which files could be accessed, how searches were conducted, and what records were kept of congressional activity.
• DOJ tracked congressional searches in Epstein files review system — Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared at a House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on February 11, 2026, carrying a printed document labeled "Jayapal Pramila Search History" that detailed Rep. Pramila Jayapal's searches within the DOJ's controlled, members-only review system for unredacted Epstein records. A Reuters photographer captured the document. The DOJ had established the in-person review system on February 9, 2026, as the sole mechanism for congressional access to unredacted Epstein files under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The revelation suggests the DOJ monitored lawmakers' investigative activity and used that intelligence during the oversight hearing itself.
• DOJ surveilled House member's access to Epstein files — During Attorney General Bondi's testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, a photograph captured by Reuters showed a page of Bondi's briefing book with a printout titled "Jayapal Pramila Search History," appearing to be files showing what Representative Pramila Jayapal accessed after the DOJ made some Epstein files available at DOJ offices. This represents executive branch surveillance of a legislative branch member's document access. Representative Jamie Raskin, top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said he will ask for an investigation of this "outrageous abuse of power."
• Ranking Member Raskin requested DOJ Inspector General investigation into congressional surveillance — House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin formally requested that the DOJ Inspector General investigate the DOJ's apparent surveillance of lawmakers' searches in the Epstein files review system. Raskin stated he had "reason to believe that it was happening to everyone," not just Rep. Jayapal. He also called for the DOJ to immediately stop tracking member searches, open Epstein file review to senior congressional staff, and publicly release all remaining files with only survivor information properly redacted.
• Rep. Jayapal organized formal congressional letter demanding investigation into surveillance — Rep. Pramila Jayapal organized a formal congressional letter demanding an investigation into what she characterized as improper surveillance of Congress by the DOJ. Jayapal also raised the question of whether the DOJ's decision to open the Epstein files to congressional review two days early was intended to allow the DOJ to surveil members' searches and anticipate their questions for the oversight hearing.
• DOJ tracked congressional members' Epstein files research and displayed search records at hearing — During a House oversight hearing on Wednesday, US Attorney General Pam Bondi displayed a document titled "Jayapal Pramila Search History" showing which Epstein files Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal had accessed. The DOJ confirmed it monitors all Epstein file searches by lawmakers on its systems. Congressional members, including Jamie Raskin and Jayapal, alleged the tracking violates separation of powers and constitutes surveillance designed to anticipate questions and gather intelligence on their investigative activities.
• DOJ surveilled Congress members' search history of Epstein files — Multiple members of Congress confirmed that the Department of Justice tracked and monitored which Epstein documents members of Congress searched, opened, and reviewed, including timestamps. Rep. Pramila Jayapal reported that AG Bondi presented her with a printed search history of her email searches. Rep. Nancy Mace confirmed the DOJ was tagging all documents searched by members and that timestamps were associated with the tracking. Speaker Mike Johnson stated he was investigating the allegations.
• DOJ monitored congressional search history in Epstein files review system — Attorney General Pam Bondi carried a printed document labeled "Jayapal Pramila Search History" into a House Judiciary oversight hearing, revealing that the Department of Justice had tracked which Epstein-related files Rep. Pramila Jayapal searched within DOJ's controlled, members-only review system. The executive branch collected intelligence on the legislative branch's investigation of the executive branch. Rep. Jamie Raskin called the practice Orwellian and requested a DOJ Inspector General investigation; Rep. Jayapal is organizing a congressional letter demanding answers.
• Racist video of Obamas posted on Trump's Truth Social account — A racist video depicting the Obamas as apes appeared on President Trump's official Truth Social account. The video was removed, but Trump refused to apologize and claimed a staffer posted it without review. The incident occurred on an official presidential account.

Supporting reports

• Trump signed Executive Order 14385 authorizing DHS to access DOJ criminal history records and share felony conviction data with foreign governments for border security and immigration screening. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14385 on February 6, 2026, directing the Attorney General to provide the Department of Homeland Security maximum access to criminal history record information (CHRI) maintained by the Department of Justice. The order further authorizes DHS to exchange felony conviction records with Visa Waiver Program countries, countries with serious crime agreements with the U.S., and other trusted allies, on a reciprocal basis under bilateral or multilateral agreements with privacy safeguards. The stated purpose is to enhance border security and immigration screening by identifying foreign nationals with criminal histories.
• Trump issues executive order on criminal alien screening and felony record sharing with foreign governments — President Trump issued an executive order on February 6, 2026, directing the Department of Homeland Security to access criminal history records maintained by the Department of Justice for immigration screening purposes, and authorizing DHS to exchange felony conviction records with Visa Waiver Program countries and other trusted allies under bilateral or multilateral agreements with privacy safeguards. The order frames the policy as protecting national security and public safety from criminal actors, including foreign nationals with criminal histories who have entered or remained in the United States in violation of immigration law.
• Executive Order 14385: Criminal History Record Information Sharing with DHS and Foreign Governments — The White House issued Executive Order 14385 on February 6, 2026, directing the Attorney General to provide the Department of Homeland Security with access to criminal history record information (CHRI) maintained by the Department of Justice to the maximum extent permitted by law. The order also authorizes DHS to exchange felony conviction records with Visa Waiver Program countries, countries with serious crime agreements with the U.S., and other trusted allies, on a reciprocal basis under bilateral or multilateral agreements with privacy safeguards.

Supporting reports

• Representatives Khanna and Massie requested unredacted Epstein files — Representatives Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Thomas Massie (R-KY), lead sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, formally requested access to unredacted Epstein files from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Khanna stated: "The [Department of Justice] said it identified over 6 million potentially responsive pages but is releasing only about 3.5 million after review and redactions. This raises questions as to why the rest are being withheld."
• Common Cause files for temporary restraining order in Nebraska voter data case — Common Cause filed a motion for a temporary restraining order in Nebraska state court to prevent the state from releasing voter registration data to the federal government. The filing follows a hearing held the same week. Nebraska law prohibits sharing voter birthdates, driver's license information, and Social Security numbers with third parties, including the federal government. The Nebraska Secretary of State had initially indicated compliance with the federal demand after the Attorney General announced non-compliance, prompting the civil-rights organization to seek emergency court relief.
• DOJ releases investigative files on Epstein cooperation discussions before death — The US Department of Justice released investigative documents on 30 January revealing that Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers met with Manhattan federal prosecutors on 29 July 2019 to discuss potential cooperation and case resolution. The meeting occurred less than two weeks before Epstein was found dead in jail on 10 August 2019. Defense counsel did not present a specific proposal, and prosecutors suggested they contact the office if Epstein was prepared to accept responsibility or had a concrete resolution proposal.
• Justice Department releases Epstein investigative files under congressional mandate — The Justice Department released additional tranches of investigative documents into Jeffrey Epstein's crimes pursuant to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed by Congress in November 2025. A major 3.5 million-page release occurred on January 30, 2026. However, transparency advocates contend that potentially millions of additional pages remain undisclosed, suggesting incomplete compliance with the 30-day disclosure mandate.
• Trump DOJ releases Epstein files late and incompletely, claims review complete — The Trump Department of Justice released approximately 3 million pages of Jeffrey Epstein investigative files on January 30, 2026, nearly six weeks after the December 19 deadline mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the disclosure as final, stating the department's obligations under the act were complete. However, advocates, attorneys representing victims, and congressional Democrats argue that millions of potentially responsive documents remain withheld, with redactions obscuring perpetrator identities while exposing survivor names, and question whether the DOJ's determination of "non-responsive" documents masks deliberate concealment.
• Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's Epstein connections revealed in files — Journalists reviewing the newly released Epstein files discovered that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who stated last year that he and his wife had cut ties with Epstein around 2005 due to repulsion, in fact visited Epstein in 2012—four years after Epstein's first conviction for procuring a child for prostitution—and continued corresponding with him until at least 2018.
• Department of Justice released partial Epstein files with redactions — Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that the Department of Justice is releasing additional Epstein files but continuing to withhold nearly 3 million pages citing child sexual abuse material and victim protection, and another 200,000 pages due to legal privileges. Congress had passed a law requiring full disclosure by December 19, but the DOJ had released less than 1% of files until this announcement. Blanche stated the release "marks the end of a very comprehensive document review process to ensure transparency to the American people."
• Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announces DOJ will not release Epstein files showing death or abuse — Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told reporters that the Department of Justice would not release any items from the Epstein files that showed "death, physical abuse, or injury," effectively restricting public access to evidence of crimes in a high-profile case involving allegations of child sexual assault and human trafficking.
• Epstein files released contained names and identifying information of survivors — The newly released Epstein files contained the names and identifying information of multiple survivors, including some not previously associated with the Epstein operation. Twenty Epstein survivors released a statement stating: "This latest release of Jeffrey Epstein files is being sold as transparency, but what it actually does is expose survivors. As survivors, we should never be the ones named, scrutinized, and retraumatized while Epstein's enablers continue to benefit from secrecy. This is a betrayal of the very people this process is supposed to serve."
• First Lady Melania Trump's email to Ghislaine Maxwell revealed in Epstein files — The released Epstein files contain a friendly email from Melania Knauss (before she married Trump) to Ghislaine Maxwell in 2002, when Maxwell was Epstein's girlfriend. Knauss complimented Maxwell on a magazine profile and wrote: "I know you are very busy flying all over the world. How was Palm Beach? I cannot wait to go down. Give me a call when you are back in NY. Have a great time!" She signed it "Love, Melania."
• Trump appears frequently in released Epstein files — The newly released Epstein files contain frequent references to Trump. A spreadsheet listing accusations against Trump and other prominent people appeared in the files but disappeared shortly after it appeared.
• Department of Justice publishes 3.5 million pages under Epstein Files Transparency Act — The Department of Justice announced the publication of over 3 million additional pages in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law by President Trump on November 19, 2025. The release includes 2,000 videos and 180,000 images collected from five primary sources including cases against Epstein and Maxwell, FBI investigations, and an Office of Inspector General investigation. The Department stated it erred on the side of over-collecting materials and withheld only documents falling within specified categories including privilege and violence depictions. Over 500 attorneys and reviewers contributed to the effort.
• Complaint filed — Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Department of Justice — Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint in D.D.C. on January 30, 2026, challenging the Department of Justice's denial of expedited FOIA processing and failure to produce records relating to the investigation, indictment, and presidential pardon of Representative Enrique Cuellar. CREW seeks court order compelling DOJ to process the FOIA requests on an expedited basis and conduct a reasonable search for responsive records. The underlying pardon was announced by President Trump on December 3, 2025, while criminal proceedings against Rep. Cuellar were ongoing.
• Deputy AG Blanche held press conference on Epstein files release — Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche held a press conference regarding the Epstein document release. When asked if all documents relevant to President Trump would be released like other prominent persons, Blanche stated "I can assure that we complied with the statute and we did not protect President Trump," but acknowledged "there's a hunger or thirst for information that will not be satisfied by a review of these documents." He declined to commit to releasing body camera video from federal officers involved in the Pretti shooting or their names, and said he did not know the location of firearms or the phone used to film the incident.
• DOJ released Epstein files with Trump allegations, then deleted section — The Department of Justice released a massive collection of Epstein documents totaling over 6 million pages. A section containing specific criminal allegations against Trump was posted online, then removed hours later after screenshots circulated, before being restored. The DOJ disclosed it is releasing only half the documents, determining the other half "irrelevant" or exempt under statute. Documents included an email from Epstein stating "trump is likely to be [asked] questions soon about me…supposedly a girl said that donal= had sex with her at my house when she was underage," and a report that a survivor told FBI agents Ghislaine Maxwell "presented" her to Trump and made clear she was "available."
• DOJ withholds FBI interviews documenting sexual abuse allegations against Trump — The Department of Justice withheld more than 50 pages of FBI interviews and notes involving a woman who accused Trump of sexual abuse when she was a minor, according to reporting by NPR and The New York Times. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche had claimed on January 30 that the DOJ completed its final release of Epstein files. The withheld documents include summaries of three FBI interviews with the woman about her interactions with Trump, though a fourth interview about Epstein allegations was released. A 2025 DOJ slide presentation disclosed that the woman alleged Trump attempted to force her to perform oral sex and punched her in the head when she was between 13 and 15 years old.

Supporting reports

• ICE collected DNA from nearly 920,000 immigrants in 2025, most never convicted of crime — According to data from Georgetown Law's Center on Privacy and Technology, ICE collected DNA samples from approximately 920,000 immigrants in ICE custody during 2025, including samples from young children. These samples have become the largest single source of new genetic profiles added to the FBI's criminal database, despite the vast majority of people in ICE custody never having been convicted of a crime.

Supporting reports

• ICE announces plan for migrant children tracking call center — ICE posted a notice on a government contracting site outlining its plans to establish a "National Call Center" in Nashville to track unaccompanied migrant children for potential removal, with officials claiming there is an "immediate need" to open the call center, which they expect to receive and process "6,000 to 7,000 calls per day."
• ICE announces plan to open call center in Nashville to track unaccompanied migrant children using data-enabled technology — US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) released a Request for Information (RFI) notice announcing plans to establish a 24-hour call center in Nashville, Tennessee, equipped with "data-enabled technology" to help law enforcement locate unaccompanied migrant children. The facility is expected to handle 6,000–7,000 calls daily and open by March 2026, reaching full capacity by June. ICE solicited contractor proposals for systems to integrate partner and alien data to maximize efficiency. The announcement comes amid escalating immigration enforcement under the Trump administration.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed: Just Futures Law v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement — Two non-profit organizations filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against ICE and CBP, alleging unlawful withholding of records responsive to FOIA requests submitted July 16, 2025. The complaint concerns agency contracts with Israeli surveillance technology companies Cellebrite and Paragon for phone hacking and zero-click spyware capabilities. Plaintiffs seek a court order compelling prompt processing of the FOIA requests, release of the documents, and relief from alleged denials of expedited processing and fee waivers.

Supporting reports

• Trump announces Larry Ellison as preferred buyer for TikTok's U.S. operations — President Trump announced that Larry Ellison, Oracle co-founder, would be among a consortium of American billionaires permitted to acquire TikTok's U.S. operations. The consortium also includes Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch, Dell Technologies CEO Michael Dell, and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. Ellison will gain access to data on the political views, consumption habits, and social connections of tens of millions of American TikTok users. The deal is required under a law passed by Congress and signed by President Biden.

Supporting reports

• Trump Justice Department building largest voting database — The New York Times reported that Trump's Justice Department is quietly building the largest national voting database in the agency's history, which includes data from more than 30 states. Experts say efforts to collect information about individual voters, including their names and addresses, may be against the law, and have raised concerns about the data being used to revive debunked claims about the 2020 presidential election being stolen or to discredit future elections.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration reinstated ICE spyware contract with Paragon — ICE is set to gain access to spyware from the Tel Aviv-based company Paragon after the Trump administration reinstated its contract, which had been dropped by President Joe Biden. The spyware is designed to hack phones and both read and record private, encrypted messages. It has reportedly been used to target activists and journalists in Europe.

Supporting reports

• Trump accuses Soros of funding violent protests — On Truth Social, Trump said George Soros and his "Radical Left" son should face RICO charges, baselessly accusing them of funding "Violent Protests" across the country and adding, "Be careful, we're watching you!"