Narrow these 17 — tap a value to filter:
Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Oct 18, 2026 TikTok permanently banned advertising for a critical documentary about Elon Musk Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
A platform's ad ban on content critical of a politically connected figure raises questions about politically influenced content moderation.
Supporting reports
- TikTok permanently bans ads for Musk documentary — On October 18, 2026, TikTok permanently banned advertising for "Musk," a critical documentary about Elon Musk. TikTok cited policies prohibiting ads "referencing, promoting, or opposing" current or past public officials and ads advocating for or against elections. However, Musk is a private CEO with no current public position, and the ads promote a film rather than a candidate. This action occurs as Musk has become a major Republican donor and Trump ally.
Oct 12, 2026 MAGA influencers spread a false claim that James Talarico had been hospitalized in a mental facility, later disproven by the hospital Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Coordinated disinformation targeting a Senate candidate's health, amplified by a major platform owner, exemplifies election-season falsehoods aimed at damaging a campaign.
Supporting reports
- MAGA influencers spread false conspiracy theory about Democratic candidate James Talarico — MAGA influencers, including prominent accounts amplified by Elon Musk, spread a false conspiracy theory that Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico was hospitalized in an Ohio mental facility rather than recovering from the flu as he claimed. MAGA influencer Nick Sortor posted that an "Ohio mental hospital CONFIRMS James Talarico was discharged from the facility earlier this week," but the hospital later confirmed Talarico had never received treatment there. Talarico's opponent, Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, seeded doubt about Talarico's illness. Talarico's spokesperson JT Ennis called the claim "a lie designed to promote a pathetic conspiracy theory." Texas journalist Tony Ortiz reported that the source of the false audio initially shopped the story to Sara Gonzales of The Blaze and Daily Mail, but it "didn't pass legal so they declined," after which the source gave it to an influencer "because they have lower standards than journalists."
Oct 11, 2026 Elon Musk amplified a false conspiracy theory that Democratic candidate James Talarico was hospitalized in a mental health facility Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
A billionaire with massive platform reach and direct financial stakes in Republican victories spread disproven claims about a Democratic candidate, distorting the election information environment.
Supporting reports
- Elon Musk amplifies false conspiracy theory about James Talarico — Elon Musk used his X platform to elevate a false conspiracy theory about Texas Democratic candidate James Talarico, claiming the Talarico campaign was "hiding something big" regarding alleged mental health facility admission. Musk's post garnered over 870,000 views, more than double the impression count of the original post. The episode demonstrates Musk's use of his platform and financial resources—he has spent at least $276 million on midterm Republican efforts since July—to influence the 2026 midterm elections through the spread of falsehoods about Democratic opponents.
- Elon Musk amplifies false conspiracy theory about Democratic candidate — Elon Musk was identified as the most prominent amplifier of the false conspiracy theory about Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico, using his own posts and his X algorithm to spread the disinformation. The bulletin notes that Musk continued to amplify the lies despite the hospital confirming Talarico had never been treated there.
Jul 27, 2026 CBS News New York and CBS News republished and later partially corrected false petition claims about Mayor Mamdani Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
A broadcast network amplified unverified claims before quietly editing coverage and removing social posts without full public correction, spreading confusion.
Supporting reports
- CBS News New York republished false petition claims without verification — On July 27, CBS News New York published an article stating "Thousands of 9/11 victims' families are asking New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani not to attend this year's solemn remembrance ceremony," directly echoing the New York Post's unverified claims. After Popular Information contacted the author, the headline and opening were changed that evening to "Petition asking NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani not to attend 9/11 remembrance ceremony purportedly draws thousands of signatures," then changed again on July 28 to "Petition from 9/11 families asks NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani not to attend remembrance ceremony"—a version that falsely suggests the petition represents 9/11 families as a group. No editor's note disclosed the corrections.
- CBS News initially reports false claim, then corrects after inquiry — CBS News New York initially reported that "thousands of 9/11 victims' families are asking New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani not to attend" the 9/11 ceremony, directly echoing the false New York Post headline. After Popular Information contacted CBS for comment, the network removed the false claim and revised the article to state the petition had "purportedly drawn thousands of signatures, including some victims' families"—a more cautious formulation that acknowledged the unverified nature of the claim.
- CBS News removed social media posts about petition without public explanation — On July 28 at 3:08 p.m., the CBS News main Instagram account (3.3 million followers) posted the CBS News New York story about the petition. On the evening of July 29, the video was removed without explanation. CBS News also removed an X post from CBS News New York linking to the story. A CBS News source told Popular Information that the posts were removed after being told "CBS News New York's reporting was inaccurate," but the underlying article remained online. CBS News cited organizational separation between CBS News and CBS News New York to explain why the article was not corrected or removed.
Jul 27, 2026 Fox Business and Fox News broadcast false and inflated petition signature figures targeting Mayor Mamdani Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
Cable outlets amplified unverified and inflated claims to a national audience without independent verification, deepening a coordinated disinformation cycle.
Supporting reports
- Fox Business falsely reported petition signature count as 15,000 — On the July 27 edition of The Evening Edit on Fox Business, anchor Elizabeth MacDonald reported that "9/11 families, more than 15,000 want Mamdani banned from 9/11 ceremonies." This figure was not supported by any version of the petition's actual signature count (which ranged from 1,100 to 3,515 depending on the source's claim) and represented a further distortion of already-inflated numbers as the story spread through right-wing media outlets.
- Fox News amplifies unsubstantiated petition story with editorial commentary — Fox News, owned by Rupert Murdoch (same owner as the New York Post), featured the petition story on air within hours of publication. Fox News pundits Tomi Lahren and Rich Edson offered editorial commentary suggesting Mamdani should not attend the 9/11 ceremony, while Fox Business host Cheryl Casone made unsubstantiated claims that Mamdani "does not have much sorrow about 9/11" and would have supported the 9/11 attackers. These statements were made without verification of the petition's claims or Mamdani's actual positions.
Jul 26, 2026 New York Post published a false headline claiming thousands of 9/11 families demanded Mayor Mamdani be banned from a memorial ceremony Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
A major outlet published unverified figures about opposition to an elected official, later silently revising the story rather than issuing a transparent correction.
Supporting reports
- New York Post published false headline about 9/11 families petition against Mayor Mamdani — On July 26, the New York Post published a front-page headline claiming "Thousands of 9/11 families demand Mamdani be banned from 25th-Anniversary," reporting 3,515 signatures "most from victims' family members." The online version stated 1,100 signatures "including from at least 300 victims' families." Petition organizer Giovanni Galante later admitted to Popular Information that he maintained no list of victims' families and the 300 figure was an unsubstantiated estimate. The New York Post did not issue a correction but instead quietly edited the article a third time on July 28, attributing inflated estimates (3,000–7,500) to Galante rather than reporting them as fact.
- New York Post publishes unsubstantiated claim about 9/11 families petition against Mamdani — The New York Post ran a front-page story claiming "thousands of 9/11 families" demanded that New York City Council Member Zohran Mamdani be banned from the 25th-anniversary 9/11 commemoration. The article cited a Change.org petition with 1,100+ signatures, claiming "at least 300" were from victims' families. Upon investigation by Popular Information, petition organizer Giovanni Galante admitted there was no verified list of family members and the "300" figure was an unsubstantiated estimate based on assumed social-network spread. As of reporting, nearly 16,000 people had signed; Change.org verified only that signatures came from "real people," not that signatories were 9/11 family members. The story went viral on right-wing media and was amplified by Fox News before being partially corrected by CBS News.
- New York Post concealed correction through silent article edits — After Popular Information revealed the falsity of the petition numbers on July 28, the New York Post did not issue a public correction. Instead, on July 28 at 3:20 PM, the article was altered to attribute inflated estimates (3,000–7,500 victims' family signers) to Galante as his "estimate" rather than presenting them as verified fact. This edit occurred less than 24 hours after Galante admitted to Popular Information that he had no list and his original 300 figure was speculative. The New York Post did not respond to requests for comment about the silent edits.
Jul 16, 2026 Trump delivered a primetime address with declassified documents claiming foreign election interference and called for revoking NBC and ABC broadcast licenses Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Selective declassification paired with threats to punish networks for editorial decisions combined election disinformation with attacks on press freedom.
Supporting reports
- Trump delivered speech claiming foreign election interference while releasing heavily redacted documents — Trump held a major speech claiming Venezuela and China tampered with U.S. elections, citing declassified intelligence documents. The documents showed Russia attempted to help Trump in 2020—information Trump omitted from his remarks. Trump announced immediate declassification of election-related intelligence and called on DNI, DOJ, FBI, and CIA to investigate alleged coverups and file criminal charges. Trump also called for revocation of NBC and ABC broadcast licenses, claiming they refused to cover the speech and were "part of a plot."
- Trump releases declassified intelligence documents during primetime address — During a primetime address, the Trump administration released a batch of declassified intelligence documents. According to reporting, the documents appear to prove the opposite of what Trump intended them to demonstrate, raising questions about the selective declassification and use of intelligence for political purposes.
- White House issues "What They Are Saying" release on Trump's declassification address regarding election interference — The White House published a compilation of statements from administration officials, Republican lawmakers, and conservative commentators responding to President Trump's primetime address in which he released newly declassified documents. The release claims the documents reveal foreign election interference (specifically Chinese hacking of 220 million voter files), vulnerabilities in U.S. election infrastructure, and alleged suppression of this information by intelligence officials. The statements promote passage of the SAVE America Act, which the release characterizes as requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship.
- White House issues fact sheet on declassified election intelligence and foreign interference claims — The White House published a fact sheet titled "Setting the Record Straight" asserting that President Trump declassified intelligence revealing foreign adversaries (China, Russia, Iran, North Korea) compromised U.S. voter data and election infrastructure. The document claims China obtained personal data on 220 million American voters in 2020, that intelligence officials deliberately withheld this information from the President, and that the Biden administration covered up the breach while responding to similar incidents involving other nations. The fact sheet also references alleged voter registration fraud in Michigan and non-citizen voter registrations. Trump directed the Director of National Intelligence, DOJ, FBI, and CIA to investigate how the intelligence was hidden and to pursue potential criminal charges.
Mar 27, 2026 Trump reposted Russian propaganda about Ukraine and President Biden Corroborated Power and Authority
The president amplified foreign disinformation targeting a domestic political rival and a wartime ally, serving a foreign adversary's propaganda goals.
Supporting reports
- Trump reposted Russian propaganda about Ukraine and Biden — On March 27, President Trump reposted Russian propaganda claiming that Ukraine discussed funneling money to President Biden's reelection campaign. The repost amplified disinformation originating from a foreign adversary currently engaged in war against Ukraine.
Jan 28, 2026 FBI executed a search warrant seizing 700 boxes of 2020 election ballots and voter rolls from Fulton County, Georgia Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Seizure of certified election materials based on debunked fraud claims, with the intelligence chief present, threatens to undermine public confidence in past election results.
Supporting reports
- FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County elections office, seizes ballots and voter data — FBI agents executed a criminal search warrant at the Fulton County elections office in Union City, Georgia, on January 28, 2026, seizing approximately 700 boxes of election materials including all ballots, tabulator tapes, electronic ballot images, and voter rolls. The raid was conducted at the behest of the Trump administration as part of efforts to relitigate the 2020 presidential election. Election integrity experts have confirmed the 2020 election was the most secure to date, and dozens of legal challenges to Trump's defeat have failed.
- FBI raid on Fulton County election office based on debunked election-denial claims — On 28 January 2026, the FBI raided the Fulton County election office in Georgia, seizing nearly 700 boxes of election materials. The search warrant affidavit, unsealed on 11 February, reveals the raid's rationale was based on debunked claims from election deniers and originated from a referral by Kurt Olsen, a White House lawyer who previously sought to overturn the 2020 election. Witnesses included conservative activists and Trump-aligned Georgia state election board members. Claims cited in the affidavit—regarding ballot image discrepancies, tabulator tape handling, and "pristine" ballots—had been previously investigated and debunked by state officials.
- FBI seized 2020 election records from Fulton County in January raid — On January 28, 2026, FBI agents executed a criminal search warrant at Fulton County's election offices in Georgia, seizing approximately 700 boxes of 2020 election documents. In a federal court hearing on March 27, Fulton County's lawyers argued the FBI's affidavit contained misrepresentations and relied on debunked claims from witnesses, some of whom had been sanctioned for lying or convicted of other crimes. The county contends the seizure was part of the Trump administration's campaign to delegitimize the 2020 election results and that the statute of limitations for any alleged crimes has expired.
- Trump directs national intelligence investigation into voting machines — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard launched an investigation into voting machines at Trump's direction. Simultaneously, the FBI conducted an unprecedented search of the Fulton County, Georgia election office in late January 2026, seizing ballots related to the 2020 election. The basis for the raid relied on recycled and debunked claims about the 2020 election. These actions are part of a broader administration effort to undermine confidence in election integrity ahead of November 2026 midterms.
- Tulsi Gabbard present at FBI search warrant execution at Fulton County elections office — On January 28, FBI agents executed a search warrant at the Fulton County elections hub in Union City, Georgia, seeking 2020 election records including ballots, tabulator tapes, ballot images, and voter rolls. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, was present at the scene. An unnamed administration official cited election security and foreign interference concerns; Gabbard has not publicly explained her presence. Democratic lawmakers questioned whether her attendance violated protocols or represented a politicization of the intelligence community.
- FBI agents raided Fulton County, Georgia election office and seized 2020 election materials — FBI agents, operating under a warrant issued by U.S. Attorney Thomas Albus (appointed by Trump to the Eastern District of Missouri), raided an election office in Fulton County, Georgia and removed 700 boxes of ballots, tabulation tapes, and other election-related materials from the 2020 election. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was present at the raid, met with some of the FBI agents, and connected Trump to the agents by phone, allowing Trump to speak directly to them during the operation.
- FBI raided Fulton County election office under Trump administration direction — On January 28, 2026, FBI agents executed a warrant to seize records from the Fulton County, Georgia election office related to the 2020 election. The warrant authorized seizure of physical ballots, voting machine tabulator tapes, voter rolls, and electronic data. Trump administration officials claimed the materials constituted evidence of crime. Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's Director of National Intelligence, was on site despite the DNI having no domestic law enforcement role and being tasked with foreign intelligence.
- FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County election office for 2020 election records — The FBI executed a search warrant at the Fulton County, Georgia election office on January 29, 2026, seeking ballots, tabulator tapes, ballot images, and voter rolls from the 2020 election. County Commissioner Mo Ivory stated the initial warrant was "legally incorrect" and was challenged by county officials before the FBI obtained a corrected version. Democratic officials expressed concern that chain of custody protections were inadequate, fearing the Trump Administration could modify seized materials. The warrant was issued by interim U.S. Attorney Thomas Albus (Eastern District of Missouri) and suggests alleged criminal conduct involved retaining records and tabulating false ballots.
- FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County election office, seizing 2020 ballots and records — FBI agents executed a search warrant at the Fulton County, Georgia election office on Wednesday afternoon, seizing all 2020 election ballots, tabulator tapes, ballot images, and voter rolls. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was present during the raid. The action follows the Trump administration's nationwide push to obtain voter rolls and investigate alleged election fraud, despite courts dismissing three of nearly two dozen related DOJ lawsuits. Election officials and experts contend the raid has little legal basis and serves to undermine public confidence in election integrity ahead of the 2026 midterms.
- FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County elections warehouse — The Federal Bureau of Investigation executed a search warrant at the elections warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize ballots from the 2020 presidential election, including all tabulator tapes and ballot images from the original ballot count. The seizure also included all voter rolls from Fulton County. The action breaks the chain of custody and contaminates the files. This action occurs as President Trump continues to assert that the 2020 election was stolen despite zero evidence, five years of debunked claims, and dismissal of dozens of court cases.
- FBI seizes 2020 election ballots from Fulton County, Georgia warehouse — The FBI executed a search warrant at the elections warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize ballots from the 2020 presidential election. This action is part of ongoing efforts by Trump and his allies to promote unfounded claims of voter fraud despite a lack of evidence.
- Georgia State Board of Elections subpoenas 2020 election records from Fulton County — The Federal Bureau of Investigation seized ballots from the 2020 presidential election stored in a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia. The seizure occurred as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been reassigned to investigate Trump's claims that the 2020 election was stolen, focusing on allegations of foreign government involvement.
- FBI raids Fulton County election office for 2020 materials — The Georgia State Board of Elections, which has a Trump-aligned majority, issued a subpoena for 2020 election records from Fulton County at the urging of Trump and election denialists. Fulton County initially sought to quash the subpoena in court. In December, a Fulton County superior court judge ruled in the state board's favor, ordering the county to turn over records. County officials estimated the cost of producing the documents at $376,800 and had scheduled a February 9 meeting to discuss the transfer process before the FBI raid occurred.
- DHS warns of prosecution for doxing ICE agents — FBI agents conducted a raid on the Fulton County election office to seize materials related to the 2020 presidential election. The action is characterized as part of the Trump Administration's broader effort to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election results and to support claims of election fraud.
- FBI Atlanta field office chief removed after questioning DOJ's 2020 election investigation — The Department of Homeland Security, through Secretary Kristi Noem, issued a public warning that it would prosecute individuals who identify ICE agents online to "the fullest extent of the law." The statement characterized those engaged in identifying agents as criminals "taking the side of vicious cartels and human traffickers." The warning was issued in response to antifa groups in Portland identifying ICE officers.
- Trump administration pursues nationwide voter roll seizures via DOJ lawsuits — Paul W Brown, special agent in charge of the FBI's Atlanta field office, was reportedly removed from his post after expressing concerns about unsubstantiated voter fraud allegations in Fulton County, Georgia, and refusing to carry out searches and seizures of election records. The removal occurred one week before the DOJ executed a search warrant seizing 700 boxes of 2020 election records from the county elections office. National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard was present during the raid, prompting Democratic concern about partisan overreach.
- Attorney General Bondi linked voter roll demands to immigration enforcement — The Trump administration has launched a nationwide effort to obtain voter rolls containing sensitive information from nearly every U.S. state, including Georgia, through Department of Justice lawsuits. Experts report little legal basis for the move; three of nearly two dozen DOJ lawsuits have already been dismissed by courts. Election security experts characterize the effort as designed to fuel false claims of fraud and weaken confidence in election results, particularly ahead of the 2026 and 2028 election cycles.
- Tulsi Gabbard, DNI, appears at Fulton County election raid — Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter this week to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz linking the Department of Justice's voter roll data demands to the administration's immigration enforcement operations in the state. The letter connected federal voter registration record requests to recent immigration raids, a linkage that had already been cited in one active DOJ voter roll lawsuit.
- — Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, was spotted on site at the Fulton County election office during the FBI raid on Wednesday evening. Her presence prompted widespread outrage and questions about why an intelligence official was involved in a domestic election matter. The Wall Street Journal reported that Gabbard is leading the Trump administration's effort to investigate voter fraud nationwide, raising concerns about the politicization of the intelligence community.
Jan 20, 2026 White House posted a digitally altered image of an arrested protester to make her appear crying Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Analysis found the administration published a manipulated photograph darkening the subject's skin and fabricating tears, using state channels to spread disinformation about a criminal defendant.
Supporting reports
- White House posted AI-altered image of arrested protester — The White House posted an image of arrested protester Nekima Levy-Armstrong on social media following her arrest. The image was altered using artificial intelligence to show her crying hysterically, whereas the original photograph from the scene showed her appearing defiant. The discrepancy was quickly noticed by observers.
- White House posted AI-generated images of arrested Minneapolis protesters — The White House posted what appear to be AI-generated images connected to ongoing arrests of protesters in Minneapolis, including an AI-altered image depicting a protest organizer with tears streaming down her face. The original image shows no such thing. This represents a deeply unethical abuse of federal government power, effectively manufacturing visual narratives to intimidate, discredit, or prejudice individuals before they have had their day in court.
- White House posts digitally altered image of arrested activist on social media — The White House posted a digitally altered photograph of activist Nekima Levy Armstrong on social media, manipulating the image to falsely portray her as crying and darkening her skin. The caption falsely described her as an "arrested far-left agitator" who "orchestrated church riots." The deception was uncovered by the Guardian and other news outlets after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had posted the original, unaltered image showing Armstrong composed and dignified.
- White House posts digitally altered image of arrested protester — The White House posted a digitally altered photograph of Nekima Levy Armstrong, arrested during an ICE protest disruption in St. Paul, Minnesota on January 23, 2026. The altered image depicted her crying, whereas the original showed her composed. Guardian analysis confirmed the images were identical except for digital manipulation of her facial expression and apparent skin tone. The White House did not deny the alteration when questioned, instead responding with a statement defending law enforcement.
- White House posts doctored photo of arrested Minneapolis activist — The White House posted a digitally altered photograph of Nekima Levy Armstrong, a Black woman arrested during a protest at a Minneapolis church on January 23, 2026. The image darkened her skin tone and added tears to her face. Armstrong is one of three people arrested in connection with the disruptive protest. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had posted unaltered images of the other two defendants, but only Armstrong's image was manipulated by the White House. Legal experts say the act may be raised in court but is unlikely to derail the case entirely.
Jan 20, 2026 Trump threatened to sue and criminally prosecute pollsters over an unfavorable approval rating survey Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
The president called for treating unfavorable polling as a criminal offense and expanded a defamation suit against the New York Times, an attempt to intimidate independent measurement of public opinion.
Supporting reports
- Claimed Civil Rights Act harmed white people — In a New York Times interview, Trump claimed that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 led to white people being "very badly treated."
- Trump announces expansion of defamation lawsuit against New York Times over unfavorable poll — President Donald Trump announced via Truth Social that he is expanding his existing defamation lawsuit against the New York Times to include claims related to a Times/Siena University poll showing his approval rating at 40%. Trump alleged the poll was "heavily skewed toward Democrats" and "fake results," and instructed his lawyers to demand the Times preserve records of how the poll was "computed." The Times responded by defending its polling methodology as rigorous and independent of political favorability.
- Trump threatened legal action against polling organizations over unfavorable poll — Following release of a New York Times/Siena poll showing Trump with 40% job approval and 56% disapproval across multiple policy areas, Trump posted three lengthy posts on Truth Social threatening to sue the Times and prosecute polling companies criminally. Trump claimed the polls were "fake" and "tremendously negative," and stated his lawyers had demanded the Times preserve records of how results were "computed."
- Trump delivers address at World Economic Forum in Davos with multiple false and exaggerated claims — Donald Trump addressed the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 22, 2026, making numerous claims about foreign policy achievements, technological leadership, renewable energy, NATO support, and budget matters. Fact-checkers found the claims ranged from exaggerated to provably false, including assertions about settling eight wars, leading China in AI, China's wind capacity, NATO allies' commitment, and the US ownership of Greenland. The speech exemplified a pattern of dubious assertions presented as fact to an international audience.
- Trump threatened to criminalize polling and sued New York Times — After the New York Times/Siena poll was released showing his approval at 40%, Trump's social media account posted that "Fake and Fraudulent Polling should be, virtually, a criminal offense" and claimed polls during the 2020 election were knowingly wrong and designed to influence the outcome. Trump announced he would add the Times/Siena poll to an existing lawsuit against the New York Times, threatening legal action against the news organization for publishing polling data.
- Trump threatened to sue New York Times over approval rating poll — Trump spent the morning lashing out at the press and threatened to sue The New York Times over its latest Siena poll, which shows his approval rating deeply underwater. Trump labeled the poll fake, accused the paper of fraud, and demanded internal records. The poll showed Trump with a net approval of minus sixteen and underwater on nearly every major issue, from the economy to foreign relations to immigration.
- Trump continues to repost conspiracy theories about 2020 election — Trump is still reposting conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, including content from QAnon-linked accounts. Many lawyers who pushed these lies lost their licenses, but the damage to the information environment remains.
Jan 7, 2026 DHS, Trump, Vance, and Karoline Leavitt issued a coordinated series of false statements labeling Renee Good a domestic terrorist to justify her killing Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Officials repeatedly claimed the shooting victim tried to run over an agent, a claim video evidence contradicted, while smearing her as part of a fabricated left-wing network.
Supporting reports
- DHS and Trump administration frame shooting as self-defense and label victim as domestic terrorist — Within hours of the shooting, DHS and ICE officials characterized the incident as lawful self-defense. Trump amplified the narrative by posting that Good "violently, willfully, and viciously ran over" an ICE officer and that the agent "almost died." DHS leadership immediately began using the phrase "domestic terrorism" to describe Good's actions, establishing a federal narrative before full evidence was released to the public.
- DOJ civil rights division leader amplifies false claim about Renee Good shooting — Harmeet Dhillon, the Republican activist now leading the Justice Department's civil rights division, shared on X (formerly Twitter) Trump's false claim that Renee Good "violently, willfully and viciously ran over the ICE officer." Forensic analysis by the New York Times, Bellingcat, and other outlets has demonstrated this characterization is false. Dhillon's amplification of disproven claims while heading the civil rights division signals politicization of the office responsible for investigating police and federal law enforcement misconduct.
- Homeland Security Secretary Noem characterized Renee Good's actions as domestic terrorism — Following the fatal shooting of Renee Good on January 7, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem publicly stated that Good had committed an act of "domestic terrorism," claiming she disobeyed officers' commands and attempted to "run a law enforcement officer over." This characterization preceded detailed video analysis that contradicted the account of the shooting.
- DHS Secretary Noem falsely labels Renee Good's death an "act of domestic terrorism" — Hours after the January 7 shooting, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem claimed that Renee Good "attempt[ed] to kill or to cause bodily harm to agents" and described the incident as an "act of domestic terrorism." White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller also described the incident as "domestic terrorism" on X. Domestic terrorism is legally defined as a violent act intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or affect government conduct by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping. Good was driving home after taking her 6-year-old son to school, had no criminal record beyond a speeding ticket, and no known links to any terrorist group.
- Trump falsely claims Renee Good ran over ICE agent — On January 7, President Trump posted on Truth Social that Renee Good "violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer." Witness videos contradict this claim, showing the first shot occurred while Ross stood in front of Good's vehicle as she turned to avoid him, and subsequent shots while he stood to the side. Trump repeated the false claim to New York Times reporters the same day, claiming Good "ran him over," and showed reporters a video he said supported his narrative. When reporters noted the video did not show Good running over Ross, Trump called it a "terrible scene."
- ICE agent shoots and kills Minneapolis resident; Trump administration launches coordinated disinformation campaign — An ICE agent fatally shot Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and poet, during a Minneapolis raid on January 8, 2026. Within hours, the Trump administration—including President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem—issued a coordinated series of false and misleading statements characterizing Good as a "domestic terrorist" and "violent rioter" who attempted to run over the officer. Video evidence contradicts these claims. Democratic officials, including Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, publicly denounced the falsehoods as "verifiably false" and "bullshit."
- Republican Randy Fine justifies killing of civilian by ICE — Republican Randy Fine appeared on television and justified the killing of Renee Good by stating that if Americans "get in the way of the government repelling a foreign invasion" they will "end up just like that lady did yesterday." The statement framed civilian death as an acceptable consequence of federal enforcement actions.
- Department of Homeland Security issued false statement about ICE shooting — The Department of Homeland Security posted a statement on social media claiming that Renee Nicole Good had "weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers" and that the shooting was an act of "domestic terrorism." The statement falsely claimed ICE officers were injured and recovering in the hospital. Video evidence contradicts these claims, showing the vehicle moving away from the officer and no evidence of officers being struck or injured. The statement also blamed "sanctuary politicians" for assaults on law enforcement.
- DHS and administration officials made false public statements about Minneapolis shooting — The Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, and President Trump made public statements claiming that federal agent Renee Nicole Good was shot in self-defense, contradicting video evidence from multiple witnesses. The administration's narrative was amplified by Fox News Channel, which shifted its coverage to align with official talking points as video evidence emerged.
- Trump posted false account of ICE shooting — President Trump posted on social media a false account of the shooting, claiming the officer "seems to have shot at her in self defense" and that "it is hard to believe that he is alive" because the woman "violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer." Video evidence shows the vehicle moving away from the officer and no contact between vehicle and officer. Trump blamed the incident on "the Radical Left" and called for Americans to "stand by and protect our Law Enforcement Officers."
- Vice President Vance made false claims about Minneapolis shooting — Vice President J.D. Vance held a press conference on the shooting and claimed that Renee Nicole Good was part of a "left wing network" and that she "aimed her car at a law enforcement officer and pressed on the accelerator." The New York Times published a slow-motion video analysis the same day demonstrating conclusively that the vehicle was turning away from the officer when he opened fire.
- White House press secretary attacked victim of federal shooting — White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt characterized the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good as resulting from a "larger, sinister left-wing movement" and described federal law enforcement as "under organized attack." The statement blamed the victim and a political movement rather than addressing the circumstances of the shooting.
- Vice President Vance repeats false claims about shooting victim at press conference — Vice President JD Vance held a press conference where he repeated the administration's false narrative that Renee Good used her car as a weapon against ICE officers. He reduced her to "that woman," insisted she tried to run down an officer, and made unsubstantiated claims that she was part of "left-wing networks" targeting officers. He also attacked the press for reporting facts about the incident, accusing media of "putting law enforcement at risk."
- Vice President Vance repeats false claims about Renee Good shooting — On January 8, Vice President J.D. Vance repeated Trump's false claims about the shooting, stating "Ramming an ICE officer with your car, that's what justifies being shot." Vance later amplified a 47-second video of the incident that was selectively leaked to Alpha News, a right-wing outlet, before being released by DHS. Vance also claimed Good was "brainwashed" and a "victim of left-wing ideology," and told reporters that Ross has "absolute immunity" for Good's killing.
- White House Press Secretary falsely labels Renee Good an "insurrectionist" — On January 8, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed Renee Good was part of "a large, sinister left-wing movement" and described her as "a leftist insurrectionist who was purposefully and illegally obstructing law enforcement operations." Vice President Vance amplified these claims. Good was affiliated with ICE Watch, a loose coalition of citizens that alerts neighbors to ICE activity using whistles and messaging apps—activity that is legal and constitutionally protected. Good had no association with any violent or extremist group.
- Homeland Security Secretary and Vice President defend ICE shooting and attack victim's character — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Vice President JD Vance publicly defended ICE agent Jonathan E Ross's shooting of Renee Nicole Good, contradicting video evidence of the incident. Noem characterized Ross as "an experienced officer" following his training and noted he had been hospitalized. Vance claimed without evidence that Good was part of a "leftwing network" attempting to incite violence against law enforcement, calling her "a victim of leftwing ideology" who had been "brainwashed." Both officials asserted the agent acted in self-defense, contradicting widely circulated video footage showing Good reversing her car to allow ICE vehicles to pass before being shot multiple times.
- Trump administration justifies Minneapolis shooting as self-defense and labels victim as domestic terrorist — The Trump administration publicly justified the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent as "self-defense" and accused Good of engaging in "an act of domestic terrorism." This narrative contradicts witness video evidence widely shared online, which shows Good had turned her vehicle wheels away from the agent before he shot her three times as she attempted to drive away.
- Trump administration officials accuse shooting victim of domestic terrorism without evidence — President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem publicly accused Renee Nicole Good of "domestic terrorism" in connection with her fatal shooting by ICE, without providing evidence and before the official investigation was complete. Vance further asserted the agent enjoyed "absolute immunity" from prosecution, a claim contradicted by legal experts and state officials.
- Vice President Vance and DHS repost video of ICE shooting of Renee Good — Vice President J.D. Vance and the Department of Homeland Security reposted a cell phone video of the fatal shooting of Renee Good by ICE agent Jonathan Ross in Minneapolis. The video, which Vance claimed exonerated Ross, actually shows Good smiling and telling Ross "I'm not mad at you" before he shot her, then calling her a slur afterward. Vance captioned his repost: "What the press has done in lying about this innocent law enforcement officer is disgusting." The administration's framing contradicted the video's actual content.
- Noem falsely claims ICE agent received hospital treatment — Secretary Noem stated that the ICE agent involved in the shooting "went to the hospital. He was hit by the vehicle. He received treatment, was released, and is spending time with his family now." The bulletin reports this claim was false; the agent had no injuries and received no treatment.
- Trump discusses taking Machado's Nobel Peace Prize — Trump told Sean Hannity he understood Machado was coming to meet with him in the next week and that accepting a Nobel Peace Prize from her "would be a great honor." When asked if receiving her prize would change his view of her running the country, Trump said he would have to speak with her and that "I can't think of anybody in history that should get the Nobel prize more than me."
- Trump endorses Vance's characterization of Renee Good as agitator — When asked about Vance's suggestion that Renee Good was part of a broad left-wing network, Trump stated he had not seen the VP's statement but called him "generally very accurate" and characterized Good as "an agitator. Probably a paid agitator. She was not normal."
Oct 6, 2025 Stephen Miller made false claims of nightly 'hand to hand combat' with Antifa in Portland and posted inflammatory rhetoric about 'leftwing terrorism' the day of an arson attack on a judge's home Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
A senior White House official spread demonstrably false claims to justify military deployment and used inflammatory rhetoric the same day a judge's home was firebombed.
Supporting reports
- Stephen Miller made false claims about ICE officer combat in Portland — Stephen Miller stated on CNN that ICE officers engage in "street battles" and "hand to hand combat every night" against Antifa to come and go from their building in Portland. When asked if characterizing protesters as terrorists was hyperbolic, Miller stated it was not and claimed he was "understating the severity of the situation," calling it "a textbook example of domestic terrorism."
- Stephen Miller posted about "leftwing terrorism" on day of judge's house fire — On the same day as the arson attack on Judge Goodstein's home, Stephen Miller posted that "There is a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country. It is well organized and funded. And it is shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general." This post came after the judge had ruled against the administration and after she received death threats.
Oct 2, 2025 Trump administration circulated racist AI-generated memes of Democratic leaders and displayed them in White House briefing room Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
Official display of racist deepfakes on loop in the White House briefing room normalizes dehumanizing political content as acceptable government communication.
Supporting reports
- JD Vance makes false claims blaming Democrats for government shutdown — Vice President JD Vance appeared at the White House briefing room and falsely claimed Democrats shut down the government demanding "billions of dollars of funding to healthcare for illegal aliens." In reality, US law bars undocumented immigrants from receiving such benefits and Democrats have not called for changing that law. Vance warned of imminent federal worker layoffs if the shutdown continues, with approximately 750,000 employees expected to be furloughed. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed agencies are preparing for cuts.
- Trump administration circulates AI-generated racist memes of Democratic leaders — The Trump administration released a video depicting Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries with an AI-generated moustache and sombrero, accompanied by mariachi music imagery. Vice President Vance defended the memes as humor and joked about stopping them if Democrats help reopen the government. Jeffries denounced the memes as racist. Vance dismissed the racism charge, questioning whether a Mexican American would be offended by sombrero imagery.
- White House displays racist deepfake videos of Democratic leaders in briefing room — The Trump administration played racist deepfake videos on loop in the White House briefing room for hours on Wednesday. The videos, posted by Trump on Monday, used fabricated audio and imagery to mock Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, depicting Jeffries with a fake sombrero and mustache and falsely attributing inflammatory language to Schumer. Vice President JD Vance defended the videos as humor during a briefing room appearance, dismissing Jeffries's characterization of them as racist. The deepfakes promoted false claims linking Democrats to providing benefits to undocumented immigrants and invoked white supremacist "great replacement" conspiracy theory rhetoric.
Oct 1, 2025 Trump posted second racist deepfake video mocking Democratic leaders Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
A repeated pattern of presidentially disseminated deepfakes targeting political opponents undermines shared factual reality and normalizes disinformation as political tool.
Supporting reports
- Trump posted doctored deepfake video mocking House Minority Leader Jeffries — President Trump posted a doctored video on social media on October 1 that manipulated statements by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) condemning bigotry. The video spliced in images of Trump wearing a sombrero and playing mariachi instruments, and added a sombrero and mustache to Jeffries's image while Mexican music played. This followed an earlier deepfake video of September 29 that faked Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer attacking Democrats and racial minorities. The posts occurred as the government approached shutdown.
Sep 29, 2025 Trump posted racist deepfake video of Democratic leaders during shutdown negotiations Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
The president distributed a fabricated video containing racist imagery and false statements attributed to opposition leaders, degrading discourse during active negotiations.
Supporting reports
- Trump posts deepfake video of Democratic leaders — President Trump's social media account posted a doctored video depicting Senate Minority Leader Schumer and House Minority Leader Jeffries. The fabricated video showed Schumer with Mexican music in the background and Jeffries wearing a sombrero and mustache, with false audio of Schumer making derogatory statements about Democrats, immigrants, and minorities. The video was released during active shutdown negotiations.
- Trump posted racist AI-generated video of Schumer and Jeffries — Trump posted on Truth Social on September 29 a vulgar and racist AI-generated video of Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, with Jeffries wearing a sombrero and Schumer saying in the fabricated audio that Democrats "have no voters anymore because of our woke, trans bullshit," and that "if we give all these illegal aliens health care, we might be able to get them on our side so they can vote for us." The post used deepfake technology to create false statements attributed to Democratic leaders. Jeffries responded by tweeting, "Bigotry will get you nowhere," and Schumer said, "If you think your shutdown is a joke, it just proves what we all know: You can't negotiate. You can only throw tantrums."
Aug 21, 2025 Fox News Channel personalities broadcast false 2020 election claims while privately acknowledging they were untrue, per unredacted court filings Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Newly disclosed texts confirm major media figures knowingly spread election falsehoods for ratings, deepening documented damage to public trust in electoral information.
Supporting reports
- Fox News personalities knew 2020 election was not stolen, newly unredacted filings reveal — Newly unredacted filings in the lawsuit Smartmatic brought against Fox News included text messages showing that Fox News Channel personalities knew the 2020 election was not stolen. Jesse Watters mused to Greg Gutfeld about ratings if Fox went "ALL in on STOP THE STEAL," and Jeanine Pirro boasted of working hard for Trump and Republicans.