Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders White House to restore press credentials for CNN, MS Now, and Politico — District Court Judge Timothy Kelly issued a preliminary injunction on October 14, 2026, ordering the Trump White House to restore and maintain White House press access for journalists from CNN, MS Now, and Politico. The three outlets had been banned on September 18, 2026, by presidential order citing "fake news." Judge Kelly found the plaintiffs likely to succeed on due process and First Amendment claims, noting that Trump's own public statements admitted the ban was retaliatory for editorial content rather than based on legitimate security concerns.

Supporting reports

• Trump banned journalists from White House press room; court ruled violation of free speech and due process — U.S. District Court Judge Timothy J. Kelly, a Trump appointee, ruled that Trump had banned more than 70 journalists from CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House press room because he wanted more favorable coverage. Kelly ruled the ban violated both free speech and due process protections under the Bill of Rights and that Trump could not ban the organizations from the White House, though he did not address whether the administration could bar reporters from Air Force One or the Oval Office. The Justice Department announced it will appeal the ruling.
• Stay pending appeal decided — Cable News Network, Inc. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:26-cv-03287 — Judge Kelly issued an opinion and order granting Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, which keeps in place, while the case proceeds, the relief from the court's earlier temporary restraining order: Defendants other than the President, must restore the White House “hard pass” press credentials of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO employees. The court held that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their Fifth Amendment due process claim because they were not told in advance what conduct could cost them their passes or that revocation was a possible sanction. The court also found Plaintiffs likely to succeed on their First Amendment retaliation and viewpoint discrimination claims. The court concluded that the president likely revoked the passes “because he believes that their reporting is generally inaccurate and biased against him,” rejected Defendants' national security rationale as likely “a post-hoc justification” without support in the record, and denied Defendants' request for a stay pending appeal.
• Federal judge orders White House to restore press credentials for CNN, MS Now, and Politico — District Court Judge Timothy Kelly issued a preliminary injunction on October 14, 2026, ordering the Trump White House to restore and maintain White House press access for journalists from CNN, MS Now, and Politico. The three outlets had been banned on September 18, 2026, by presidential order citing "fake news." Judge Kelly found the plaintiffs likely to succeed on due process and First Amendment claims, noting that Trump's own public statements admitted the ban was retaliatory for editorial content rather than based on legitimate security concerns.

Supporting reports

• Preliminary injunction ruling — Democracy for the Arab World Now, Inc. d/b/a DAWN v. Trump (S.D.N.Y.) 1:26-cv-05957 — Judge Jesse Furman granted in substantial part Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. The injunction bars all Defendants except President Trump from enforcing IEEPA's civil or criminal penalties against Plaintiffs for the conduct described in their complaint, to the extent that conduct allegedly violates EO 14203's prohibition on providing “services” to or for the benefit of sanctioned persons. Following his earlier ruling in Rona v. Trump , Judge Furman held that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their First Amendment claim. He found that the prohibition is a content-based regulation of their speech-based activities, meaning it restricts speech based on its function or purpose. He also found that it fails strict scrutiny, which requires the government to show a restriction is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling interest. He did not reach Plaintiffs' statutory or APA claims. The court denied Plaintiffs' requests to enjoin the president, declare the order facially unconstitutional, and enter a universal injunction barring enforcement against anyone.
• Federal judge blocks Trump administration sanctions on human rights groups assisting ICC Gaza investigation — US District Judge Jesse M Furman issued a preliminary injunction on October 14, 2026, temporarily blocking the Trump administration from sanctioning two human rights organizations, Democracy for the Arab World Now (Dawn) and Taxpayer Alliance Against Genocide (Taag), for assisting the International Criminal Court's investigation into alleged war crimes in Gaza. The groups had challenged a February 2025 executive order imposing sanctions on entities supporting ICC investigations deemed threatening to US or Israeli national security. Furman ruled the order likely violated the groups' First Amendment rights as a content-based speech regulation that cannot survive strict scrutiny.

Supporting reports

• White House bars Politico from Air Force One press pool; CNN also repeatedly excluded — The White House refused to allow Politico on Air Force One on Monday, preventing the news organization from fulfilling its press corps pool responsibilities. This follows a pattern: news outlets filed a lawsuit on September 21 alleging the ban violates the First and Fifth Amendments. Judge Timothy Kelly sided with the plaintiffs and issued a temporary restraining order requiring the Trump administration to reinstate journalists' press badges. Since then, the White House has repeatedly barred CNN from traveling on Air Force One on days when it was CNN's turn to be the TV pool representative. The Trump administration appears to be justifying these restrictions by claiming access to the White House complex differs from access to tight spaces like Air Force One. Judge Kelly is scheduled to hold a hearing on Thursday over the news outlets' request for a preliminary injunction.
• White House blocks Politico from Air Force One pool rotation — The White House decided to block Politico from riding on Air Force One and called numerous other outlets to ask one to fill the primary print slot for the out-of-town pool rotation. Each of those outlets declined to step in, leaving the pool slot unfilled.
• Trump administration defended restrictions on news organizations' press access — The Trump administration continued to defend its decision to restrict press access for reporters from CNN, MSNBC, and Politico on journalistic conduct grounds. CNN, MSNBC, and Politico filed a federal court challenge, asking a judge to continue blocking the restrictions and to rule on long-term protections. The judge previously ordered temporary relief and is expected to rule on permanent protections.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders Trump administration to restore White House press credentials to banned outlets — U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued an early-morning order on Thursday requiring the Trump administration to restore press credentials to journalists from CNN, MS Now, and Politico for a 14-day period. The judge found the administration likely violated due process and First Amendment protections when it revoked the outlets' hard passes on Saturday without advance notice or opportunity to be heard. Kelly ruled the standards cited by the White House were "so vague" as to be constitutionally inadequate and expressed skepticism that national security was the actual motivation, noting Trump's content-based statements about the ban. A hearing on a preliminary injunction was scheduled during the 14-day restoration period.
• Federal judge ordered White House to restore press credentials for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico reporters — U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued a 14-day restraining order requiring the White House to immediately restore press credentials for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico reporters after Trump banned them. The judge found the news organizations were likely to succeed on their claim that their passes were revoked without due process. When reporters attempted to cover Trump's event with Chinese President Xi, they were initially denied access in defiance of the court order, prompting attorneys to file an emergency motion. The White House eventually admitted the reporters after other media outlets joined a boycott.
• U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly granted media outlets' request to block Trump's White House ban on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico — After a hearing on Trump's Friday ban of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House campus, U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly (appointed by Trump in 2017) granted the media outlets' request for a temporary restraining order, finding that the administration's national security justification was pretextual. Kelly noted that the stories the White House objected to were "routine" and that one was based on a White House press call. Kelly ordered the credentials of 78 journalists restored immediately.

Supporting reports

• Charges dropped against Stanford students in pro-Palestine protest case — Five Stanford University students who faced felony conspiracy to trespass and vandalism charges related to a June 2024 occupation of the university president's office had all charges dropped on Monday. The California attorney general's office, which took over the case after the original prosecutor was recused for conflict of interest, reached a resolution requiring 100 hours of community service and approximately $50,000 in restitution—far less than the $1 million initially threatened. Three additional students with prior misdemeanor pleas will have convictions withdrawn upon completing community service.

Supporting reports

• Judges rule against Trump administration in 75 First Amendment cases — Reuters analysis found that federal judges ruled against the Trump administration on First Amendment grounds in 75 of 93 cases where such arguments were raised, compared to 13 rulings against the Biden administration in 27 cases. The rulings covered retaliation against law firms, journalist restrictions, university funding cuts, actions against pro-Palestinian students and faculty, and excessive force at protests. Ten decisions came from Republican-appointed judges. The administration appealed approximately two-thirds of the rulings and persuaded appeals courts to pause or overturn 15 decisions.

Supporting reports

• Federal appeals court temporarily blocks re-detention of Mahmoud Khalil — The Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary stay blocking the re-detention of Mahmoud Khalil, a 31-year-old Palestinian-American activist and US green card holder, pending supreme court review. Khalil was detained by ICE in March 2025 for 104 days; the government argued his pro-Palestinian activism constituted a threat to US foreign policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio cited concerns about antisemitism and Jewish student safety. The temporary block gives Khalil reprieve as his legal team prepares a supreme court petition.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge issues injunction against federal agents' use of crowd control force — On November 6, 2025, U.S. District Court Judge Sara Ellis in Chicago issued a broad injunction prohibiting federal agents from using tear gas, pepper balls, and other "less-lethal" crowd control measures in violation of constitutional rights. Ellis found that federal agents had violated protesters' First Amendment rights to free speech and free assembly, and had prevented the free exercise of religion by using force against clergy members. The judge repeatedly noted that federal agents had made false statements.

Supporting reports

• Judge McFadden orders White House to restore Associated Press media access — US District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee, issued a 41-page order requiring the White House to restore full access for Associated Press journalists to the Oval Office, Air Force One, and White House events. The AP had been denied access after refusing to adopt the Trump administration's renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the "Gulf of America." McFadden ruled that viewpoint-based exclusion of journalists from government spaces violates the First Amendment. The White House had argued the AP lacks a right to "special access," but the judge found the Constitution prohibits selective closure of doors to journalists based on their editorial positions.
• Federal judge blocked White House from restricting AP access — A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the White House from restricting access to the Associated Press because of its decision to use "Gulf of Mexico" instead of "Gulf of America."

Supporting reports

• Yunseo Chung files lawsuit against Trump administration over green card revocation — Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old Columbia University student and green card holder from South Korea, filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump and high-ranking administration officials on March 24 challenging the revocation of her green card and the targeting of her for deportation. The lawsuit alleges that ICE used immigration enforcement as a tool to suppress her political speech and that of other students engaged in pro-Palestinian activism, in violation of her First Amendment rights and due process protections.
• Yunseo Chung filed lawsuit after immigration arrest attempt — Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old Columbia University student who has lived in the US since age 7, filed a lawsuit against Trump and other administration officials after immigration agents attempted to arrest and deport her for apparently participating in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. A federal judge later temporarily blocked the Trump administration from detaining Chung.
• State Department orders revocation of green card for Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil — Immigration officials arrested Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and leader of pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, acting on an order from the State Department to revoke his green card. Khalil remains in custody in Louisiana. Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly stated the government would "kick out" green card holders who participate in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, signaling a coordinated policy to strip legal status from protesters based on their political speech.
• Trump administration initiates deportation proceedings against Columbia student protester Yunseo Chung — Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old permanent resident who participated in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, filed a lawsuit on March 24, 2025, against the Trump administration after immigration authorities began deportation efforts against her. Three days after her arrest by New York police during campus demonstrations, ICE signed an administrative arrest warrant. The lawsuit names Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other officials, alleging the government is retaliating against her for constitutionally protected protest activity and seeking to revoke her permanent resident status without justification.
• Yunseo Chung, green card holder, sues after ICE attempts arrest and revokes green card — Yunseo Chung, a green card holder who has lived in the United States since age seven and attended pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, sued the Trump administration on Monday, March 24, 2025, after immigration officials attempted to arrest her. ICE officials informed her lawyer that her green card had been revoked. The case exemplifies the administration's targeting of noncitizen students engaged in political protest and speech critical of Israel's military actions in Gaza.
• Federal judge blocks detention of Columbia protester facing deportation — U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald issued a temporary restraining order preventing Immigration and Customs Enforcement from detaining or transferring Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old green card holder and Columbia University student, out of New York's southern district. Chung, arrested during a Gaza solidarity protest at Barnard College, sued the Trump administration alleging it is using immigration enforcement to suppress her protected speech. The judge found the government had not presented sufficient factual basis for its deportation claims against the legal permanent resident, who has lived in the U.S. since age seven.
• Federal judge halts deportation proceedings against Columbia student Yunseo Chung — Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old Columbia University student and green card holder, sued the Trump administration after ICE revoked her green card and sought her arrest following her attendance at a pro-Palestinian sit-in protest at Barnard College on March 9. ICE obtained a warrant citing a law against "harboring noncitizens" and accused her of posing a threat to U.S. foreign policy interests. On March 25, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order halting arrest and deportation efforts, finding no evidence she posed a danger to the community.
• Federal judge blocks ICE detention of Columbia undergraduate Yunseo Chung — A US judge in Manhattan issued an order blocking immigration officials from detaining Yunseo Chung, a Columbia University undergraduate and permanent resident (green card holder), who faced deportation threats for involvement in Gaza solidarity protests. The judicial intervention prevented the detention from proceeding.
• Federal judge blocks deportation of Tufts student detained by ICE; visa revocation challenged — Rümeysa Öztürk, a 30-year-old Fulbright scholar and doctoral student at Tufts University, was detained by masked plainclothes ICE officers on Tuesday in a Boston suburb. The Department of Homeland Security terminated her visa, alleging support for Hamas without evidence. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Denise Casper issued an order prohibiting Öztürk's removal from the United States pending further court proceedings. Her attorneys, including ACLU lawyers, argue the detention is retaliation for an opinion piece she co-authored advocating Palestinian rights and university divestment from Israel-linked companies.

Supporting reports

• Steve Wynn petitions SCOTUS to overturn NYT v. Sullivan — Billionaire Steve Wynn filed a petition urging the Supreme Court to overturn the 1964 decision in New York Times v. Sullivan, which protects press freedom to report on public officials. This legal challenge could significantly impact media protections.