Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• US appeals court rejects Trump administration bid to redetain Georgetown scholar Badar Khan Suri — The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration's attempt to redetain Badar Khan Suri, an Indian postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University arrested by ICE in March 2025 for pro-Palestinian social media speech. The 2-1 decision upheld a lower court's bail release and rejected the government's motion to move the case from Virginia to Texas, affirming that detained immigrants retain habeas corpus rights to challenge detention in federal court even during pending removal proceedings.

Supporting reports

• Trump defended subpoenaing family members of journalists — When asked whether it is appropriate to subpoena family members of journalists to obtain information, Trump stated he did not know what was appropriate and claimed that Barack Obama did it "all the time," asserting a double standard in how his actions are treated compared to his predecessor's.

Supporting reports

• Major media outlets omitted Kushner's financial conflicts from nuclear deal coverage — Nearly all major media coverage of the U.S.-Saudi nuclear agreement ignored Jared Kushner's financial conflicts of interest, including articles by the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, AP, and CNN. As of July 23, 2026, Popular Information identified only one article from a prominent outlet (Mediaite) mentioning Kushner's funding from the Saudi sovereign wealth fund. The New York Times explained how the deal broke precedent but did not examine Trump's unprecedented relationship with Saudi Arabia through Kushner. This pattern follows April 2026 reporting showing that in 202 articles about Kushner's role in Iran negotiations, only six mentioned his financial connections to Saudi Arabia.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders Trump to divulge financial details in BBC defamation lawsuit discovery — US magistrate judge Enjoliqué Lett ruled during a discovery hearing that Donald Trump must disclose detailed financial information from his businesses as part of his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC. The ruling stems from Trump's 2025 lawsuit over a 2024 BBC documentary that edited footage of his January 6 speech. The judge also authorized the BBC to subpoena dozens of Trump associates, including family members and advisers like Donald Trump Jr., Steve Bannon, and Stephen Miller, to investigate Trump's intentions on January 6. Trump's legal team indicated it will appeal the decision and attempt to amend the complaint to narrow the scope.

Supporting reports

• Twelve US states obtain temporary restraining order blocking Paramount-Warner Bros merger for 28 days — A coalition of 12 US states, led by California, obtained a temporary restraining order this week blocking Paramount's $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery from closing for 28 days pending a preliminary injunction ruling. The states allege the merger reduces competition in cable and theatrical markets. Paramount and Skydance agreed to pause the deal until a court ruling or 1 June 2027. The delay could cost Paramount Skydance approximately $7 million daily in fees owed to Warner Bros shareholders if the merger does not close by 30 September.
• Paramount-Warner Bros Merger Paused — The merger between Paramount and Warner Bros has been paused, raising questions about the future of media consolidation. This pause may affect the media landscape, competition, and content distribution. The reasons for the pause have not been fully disclosed, leading to speculation about regulatory or financial challenges.

Supporting reports

• Trump Administration Sought Phone Records of NYT Reporters and Relatives — The Trump administration issued subpoenas seeking phone records of New York Times reporters dating back to January 1, as well as records of their relatives, in connection with an investigation into the Times's reporting on security concerns regarding Trump's new Air Force One, donated by Qatar. The Times characterized the move as a "bad-faith effort to intimidate the journalists and chill their ability to report on the administration." The DOJ later withdrew the subpoenas.

Supporting reports

• Trump Attacks Media for Alleged Election Fraud Conspiracy — President Trump accused American journalists of being part of a conspiracy to protect the radical left and suppress information about alleged election fraud. He called for the government to revoke the broadcast licenses of media outlets that he claims are complicit in this plot.
• Trump Claims China Compromised U.S. Election Data — In a speech, President Trump claimed that China carried out the largest compromise of election data in history, alleging that they acquired 220 million U.S. voter files. This assertion has been widely debunked, as the information is publicly available for purchase. Trump's claims serve to bolster his narrative of election fraud.

Supporting reports

• FCC Chair suggested broadcasters could lose licenses for not airing Trump speech — FCC Chair Brendan Carr suggested on NewsNation that television stations that do not air President Trump's primetime speech could lose their broadcast licenses. When asked whether broadcasters have a responsibility to air the speech given their TV licenses, Carr responded that "broadcasters have an obligation to operate in the public interest," implying license revocation as a consequence of non-compliance.

Supporting reports

• Trump delivered speech claiming foreign election interference while releasing heavily redacted documents — Trump held a major speech claiming Venezuela and China tampered with U.S. elections, citing declassified intelligence documents. The documents showed Russia attempted to help Trump in 2020—information Trump omitted from his remarks. Trump announced immediate declassification of election-related intelligence and called on DNI, DOJ, FBI, and CIA to investigate alleged coverups and file criminal charges. Trump also called for revocation of NBC and ABC broadcast licenses, claiming they refused to cover the speech and were "part of a plot."
• Trump releases declassified intelligence documents during primetime address — During a primetime address, the Trump administration released a batch of declassified intelligence documents. According to reporting, the documents appear to prove the opposite of what Trump intended them to demonstrate, raising questions about the selective declassification and use of intelligence for political purposes.
• White House issues "What They Are Saying" release on Trump's declassification address regarding election interference — The White House published a compilation of statements from administration officials, Republican lawmakers, and conservative commentators responding to President Trump's primetime address in which he released newly declassified documents. The release claims the documents reveal foreign election interference (specifically Chinese hacking of 220 million voter files), vulnerabilities in U.S. election infrastructure, and alleged suppression of this information by intelligence officials. The statements promote passage of the SAVE America Act, which the release characterizes as requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship.
• White House issues fact sheet on declassified election intelligence and foreign interference claims — The White House published a fact sheet titled "Setting the Record Straight" asserting that President Trump declassified intelligence revealing foreign adversaries (China, Russia, Iran, North Korea) compromised U.S. voter data and election infrastructure. The document claims China obtained personal data on 220 million American voters in 2020, that intelligence officials deliberately withheld this information from the President, and that the Biden administration covered up the breach while responding to similar incidents involving other nations. The fact sheet also references alleged voter registration fraud in Michigan and non-citizen voter registrations. Trump directed the Director of National Intelligence, DOJ, FBI, and CIA to investigate how the intelligence was hidden and to pursue potential criminal charges.

Supporting reports

• Trump called for revocation of NBC and ABC broadcast licenses — During his speech, Trump stated that NBC and ABC refused to cover his remarks and accused them of being "part of a plot" to continue election fraud. He called for revocation of their broadcast licenses as punishment for their editorial decision not to air the speech live.

Supporting reports

• Two US advocacy groups sue Trump administration over ICC investigation restrictions — Two US advocacy groups filed suit against the Trump administration, arguing that Trump's 2025 executive order forced them to halt constitutionally protected work with the ICC's investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes in the West Bank and Gaza. The lawsuit challenges the executive order's restrictions on cooperation with the international court.
• US advocacy groups sue Trump administration over ICC sanctions as First Amendment violation — Two US advocacy groups—Democracy in the Arab World Now (Dawn) and Taxpayer Alliance Against Genocide—filed a federal lawsuit in Manhattan alleging that the Trump administration's 2025 sanctions targeting Palestinian rights organizations, ICC officials, and a UN expert violate the First Amendment. The plaintiffs argue the sanctions have created a "profound" chilling effect on protected speech and association, forcing Americans to sever professional relationships and abandon constitutionally protected work on ICC submissions and human rights advocacy. The suit challenges the sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and names Trump, Secretary of State Rubio, Treasury Secretary Bessent, Acting Attorney General Blanche, and OFAC Director Smith as defendants.

Supporting reports

• Blanche accused of withholding additional Epstein-related information — Todd Blanche is accused of illegally withholding various categories of information related to Jeffrey Epstein. These include redacted identities in emails, names of co-conspirators, non-English documents, and a log of redactions. Judge Emmet Sullivan sided with journalist Katie Phang, who argues Blanche's actions violate the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Blanche claims privacy concerns and impracticality as reasons for withholding information, but Phang contends these reasons are unfounded and defy court orders.
• Todd Blanche accused of withholding Epstein-related documents — Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche is accused of failing to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act by withholding documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. Journalist Katie Phang sued Blanche, alleging he withheld FBI interview notes with a victim who claimed Epstein introduced her to Trump, who then assaulted her. Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled against Blanche, ordering him to release the documents by July 2. Blanche did not comply, arguing the notes were duplicative and complicated to redact. Phang is now seeking daily fines until compliance is achieved.
• Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche withholds documents required under Epstein Files Transparency Act — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who is seeking Senate confirmation, is under scrutiny for withholding documents he is required to release under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, according to a lawsuit by journalist Katie Phang. Even after a federal judge ruled in Phang's favor, Blanche has not released the additional material. Blanche testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday regarding his confirmation, but the document withholding remains unresolved.

Supporting reports

• Khalil v. The Heritage Foundation et al., complaint filed (S.D.N.Y. 1:26-cv-05929) — Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student detained by ICE for 104 days, filed a federal complaint alleging a conspiracy by the Heritage Foundation, its leaders, and Trump administration officials (including Stephen Miller and Marco Rubio) to identify and deport non-citizen pro-Palestinian activists under a coordinated plan called Project Esther. Khalil invokes the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)) to challenge interference with his rights to free speech, equal protection, and freedom from punitive detention, and alleges an unconstitutional Bill of Attainder. He seeks compensatory and punitive damages, declaratory judgment, and an injunction against continued detention or removal on pretextual grounds.
• Mahmoud Khalil Sues Trump Administration Under KKK Act of 1871 — Mahmoud Khalil, detained by ICE for over 100 days last year and currently challenging a deportation order, sued the Trump administration and pro-Israel groups including Canary Mission, Betar, and the Heritage Foundation under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The lawsuit alleges that the Trump administration conspired with these organizations to "terrorize and make an example of" Khalil to "intimidate and silence the growing movement for Palestinian rights and political freedom."
• Mahmoud Khalil files civil conspiracy lawsuit against Trump officials and pro-Israel groups — Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian-born Palestinian rights advocate and permanent US resident, filed a lawsuit in Manhattan federal court against Trump administration officials (Stephen Miller, Marco Rubio, Kristi Noem) and pro-Israel groups (Heritage Foundation, Canary Mission, Betar US), alleging a coordinated conspiracy to target and silence pro-Palestine speech. The suit, brought under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, claims the defendants worked as a "public-private partnership" to identify, arrest, and deport pro-Palestinian activists. Khalil was detained for 104 days in 2025 after his arrest by ICE over his advocacy.

Supporting reports

• ICE pepper-sprays New Jersey Senator Andy Kim at Delaney Hall detention center protest — During a protest outside Delaney Hall immigration detention center in Newark, New Jersey, in solidarity with detained immigrants on hunger strike, ICE officials pepper-sprayed New Jersey Senator Andy Kim, drawing national attention. The incident occurred as tensions escalated between protesters and a line of masked ICE officials guarding the facility. Following the incident, local and state officers deployed teargas, used batons and shields, and arrested dozens of protesters, many of whom sustained injuries from crowd-control weapons.
• Physicians for Human Rights report documents 412 verified incidents of crowd-control weapon misuse on ICE protesters, June 2025–May 2026 — Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and the University of California Berkeley Human Rights Center released a report documenting 412 verified incidents of "misuse" of crowd-control weapons—teargas, rubber bullets, pepper spray, stun grenades, and water cannons—deployed by federal, state, and local law enforcement against protesters at ICE detention centers and immigration enforcement operations between June 2025 and May 2026. The report identified 203 injuries including blindings, traumatic brain injuries, lacerations, fractures, and contusions. DHS officials were responsible for 64% of documented misuse incidents. Researchers noted the true injury count is likely far greater due to difficulty documenting invisible injuries.
• Law enforcement misuses less-lethal weapons against ICE detention facility protesters — A report released this week identified 412 instances in which law enforcement officers have misused "less-lethal weapons," such as tear gas and rubber bullets, against protesters at Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities. The report, covering the period from June 2025 to May 2026, also found 203 instances of injuries resulting from this misuse. The widespread pattern of weapon misuse against protesters raises serious concerns about excessive force and violation of constitutional rights.

Supporting reports

• ICE pepper-sprays New Jersey Senator Andy Kim at Delaney Hall detention center protest — During a protest outside Delaney Hall immigration detention center in Newark, New Jersey, in solidarity with detained immigrants on hunger strike, ICE officials pepper-sprayed New Jersey Senator Andy Kim, drawing national attention. The incident occurred as tensions escalated between protesters and a line of masked ICE officials guarding the facility. Following the incident, local and state officers deployed teargas, used batons and shields, and arrested dozens of protesters, many of whom sustained injuries from crowd-control weapons.

Supporting reports

• Trump attacked journalists and made claims about cognitive testing — At 12:23 PM, Trump posted on social media attacking New York Times journalist Maggie Haberman, calling her "Maggot Hagerman," in response to her commentary on his reference in Türkiye to the "Islamic State of Japan." He claimed he had just finished a perfect physical at Walter Reed, requested another cognitive test, and "aced them all—Got every question right," asserting that few people in Washington could do so. The White House later clarified that Trump was referring to a physical he underwent in May.
• Trump posted lengthy attack on media and Democrats — At 3:16 PM, Trump's account posted a screed of almost 450 words complaining that he won the election in a landslide against the Democratic Party and the press, yet received no compliments on his successes. He attacked journalists including Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, called Democrats "stupid people" and accused them of going "communist," and demanded that media outlets concede defeat and stop reporting on his failures and poor poll numbers. He insisted that if the election were held again, he would win by even more.

Supporting reports

• Department of Justice subpoenaed New York Times reporters over Air Force One security reporting — The Department of Justice, through U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Jay Clayton, issued subpoenas to New York Times reporters Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager, and Eric Schmitt. The subpoenas order the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday regarding an alleged violation of federal criminal law related to leaking national security information. The reporters had published a story on Wednesday reporting that the Secret Service had security concerns about the new Air Force One Boeing 747-8 and recommended the president use an older plane during his return from the NATO summit in Türkiye due to escalating Iran tensions. FBI Director Kash Patel conducted an 8-hour investigation from the White House to identify the anonymous sources.
• DOJ subpoenaed New York Times journalists over Air Force One reporting — The Trump administration issued subpoenas on Friday to several journalists at the New York Times after the outlet reported on security concerns involving Trump's new Qatari-donated Air Force One. The subpoenas seek to force the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday. NYT General Counsel David McCraw called the action "an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs." Fox chief national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin posted that the action "should alarm every American."
• New York Times Journalists Subpoenaed Over Trump Air Force One Coverage — The Trump administration subpoenaed several New York Times journalists to testify before a federal grand jury about their reporting on security concerns surrounding Trump's new Air Force One, which was donated by Qatar. The subpoenas followed a White House meeting where FBI Director Kash Patel was directed to lead a leak investigation into the newspaper's reporting. The Times' top newsroom lawyer called the move a violation of press freedom protections in the Constitution.
• DOJ subpoenas New York Times reporters — The Department of Justice issued subpoenas to reporters from the New York Times regarding a story about security concerns related to the new Air Force One plane. The subpoenas require the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury about an alleged violation of federal criminal law concerning the leaking of national security information. U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, nominated by Trump to be the next director of national intelligence, is overseeing the subpoenas. The DOJ stated that the reporters are not targets, but the act of subpoenaing journalists raises concerns about press freedom.
• DOJ issues subpoenas to New York Times journalists — The Trump administration, through the Department of Justice, issued subpoenas to multiple New York Times journalists seeking to compel their testimony before a federal grand jury in Manhattan. The subpoenas followed the Times' reporting on security concerns regarding Trump's new Qatari-gifted aircraft, which cited anonymous sources. An FBI official had previously contacted the Times requesting the article be withheld on national security grounds and demanded disclosure of sources, which the Times refused. The Times' legal counsel condemned the subpoenas as threatening constitutional press freedom.
• DOJ issued subpoenas to New York Times journalists — The Department of Justice issued subpoenas to four New York Times journalists—Julian Barnes, Eric Lipton, and Eric Schmitt—demanding they appear before a grand jury and disclose confidential sources. The subpoenas relate to the Times' reporting on security concerns surrounding the new Air Force One aircraft. The New York Times filed a motion to quash the subpoenas, arguing they were intended to punish the newspaper for its coverage and violated journalists' constitutional rights.

Supporting reports

• ICE's internal watchdog investigates U.S. citizens for speaking against agency — ICE's Office of Public Responsibility, tasked with conducting internal probes, is investigating U.S. citizens who have spoken out against the agency, according to reporting by Wired. Between January 2025 and March 2026, the office launched 131 investigations into "incidents of doxing and threats directed towards ICE employees nationwide," according to an April court declaration by an ICE official. The investigations target citizens exercising free speech rights to criticize the agency.

Supporting reports

• The New York Times Company files answer and counterclaims in EEOC employment discrimination suit — The New York Times Company filed an answer, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and two of its commissioners on July 10, 2026, in response to an EEOC Title VII complaint alleging discrimination in a 2025 promotion decision. The Times alleges the EEOC's lawsuit constitutes First Amendment retaliation for the newspaper's reporting on the Commission's case prioritization aligned with the administration's agenda, and contends the enforcement action violates the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause and the Administrative Procedure Act as arbitrary and capricious. The Times seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, vacatur of the EEOC's decision to initiate or terminate conciliation, and attorney's fees.

Supporting reports

• Pentagon and DOJ establish joint taskforce to identify and prosecute press leaks — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the creation of a joint Pentagon-DOJ taskforce to identify and prosecute unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information to the press. Hegseth delegated tasking authority to the Pentagon's Office of General Counsel to request records and support across the department for media leak investigations. The announcement follows the Trump administration's issuance of subpoenas to New York Times journalists who reported on security concerns regarding Trump's new Qatari-gifted aircraft. The taskforce represents an escalation in the administration's crackdown on leaks and press freedom.

Supporting reports

• White House attacks MeidasTouch editor over JD Vance press conference clip — The White House rapid response account quote-tweeted MeidasTouch Senior Digital Editor Acyn, calling him a "dumb ass" and accusing him of shielding a woman convicted of stealing taxpayer benefits. Acyn had posted a clip of JD Vance at a Wisconsin press conference pointing to a photo board that was washed out by lighting, making the image invisible to viewers. The White House falsely claimed Acyn had blurred the image, when the lighting issue was caused by Vance's setup of the shot. The White House later realized it had inadvertently insulted its own vice president.

Supporting reports

• Trump uses Qatari-gifted Air Force One despite security deficiencies — Trump flew from Turkey to the United Kingdom on the old Air Force One instead of his new Qatari-donated Boeing 747-8 as a security precaution related to resumed hostilities with Iran. The Secret Service urged the swap due to concerns that the new plane lacks sufficient security measures, including advanced missile defense systems and secure communications systems, despite an expedited retrofit timeline over the past year. Trump publicly misrepresented the reason for the swap, claiming he was honoring military personnel by allowing them to tour the new aircraft at Mildenhall Air Force Base. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung later claimed the false statement was "distraction and misdirection" to address threats to the president.
• Trump told reporters press endangerment was justified — When reporters asked Trump why they had been instructed to lower their window shades on the decoy flight, Trump responded that it was "because you're probably on a dangerous flight because of the sleaze bags that we have to deal with." He added that there are threats against his life "all the time" and that "I'm number one on their list, before you. But if I go, you go. Right?" and suggested reporters "perhaps someday you want to change professions," implying they should accept the risk of assassination as part of their job.
• Secret Service moved Trump from Air Force One to decoy aircraft during NATO summit — On July 8, 2026, during the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, the Secret Service received information about a possible missile attack that it considered credible and imminent. Security officials moved Trump through an airport catering truck and transferred him to a small C-32A government aircraft while Air Force One departed separately with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House staff, and the traveling press corps aboard. Most people on Air Force One did not know Trump had left. Reuters reporters aboard were ordered to close window shades during the flight and were unaware they were traveling on a decoy plane.
• Trump secretly transferred to decoy plane amid Iranian threats — On July 8, 2026, while leaving Turkey after the NATO summit, Trump secretly transferred from an older Air Force One plane to a smaller, unmarked aircraft due to credible Iranian threats against his life. To execute the transfer, White House officials left journalists and staff on the older plane, which retained the Air Force One call sign, effectively using them as decoys for a potential Iranian strike. Journalists were instructed to lower their window shades when boarding. Trump later secretly reboarded the larger plane in Britain and was filmed descending its stairs to create the appearance he had been on the flight the entire time, before boarding the Qatari jet for the return flight to Turkey.
• Trump swaps Air Force One mid-crisis and misrepresents reason — Trump swapped his Qatari-gifted private jet for the original Air Force One in the middle of the military crisis with Iran, then provided false explanations for the swap. The misrepresentation of the reason for the aircraft change suggests either deception or lack of transparency regarding presidential movements during a national security emergency.
• Trump used decoy plane with officials and press as human shields during Iranian threat — The Washington Post reported that Trump hid in a catering container and was secretly shuttled to a different plane when leaving Turkey in response to what the administration claims was an Iranian assassination threat. While Trump switched planes, he left Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, and White House press corps members aboard Air Force One as a decoy. U.S. officials could not independently verify the Israeli-provided intelligence about the threat.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — McGonigle v. Curran, U.S. Secret Service, Director of Presidential Advance, Executive Office of the President (D. Me. 1:26-cv-00349) — Amanda McGonigle, operator of the social media account "CatsOnACouch" with nearly 2 million followers posting commentary critical of Vice President JD Vance, filed a complaint in federal district court alleging that she was excluded from two official White House Task Force events in Des Moines (May 5, 2026) and Bangor, Maine (May 14, 2026) in retaliation for her viewpoint. McGonigle alleges Secret Service officers at the Bangor event singled her out by name and turned her away, stating "we know where you stand." She seeks declaratory and injunctive relief barring defendants from excluding her from future vice presidential events based on her past statements, claiming the exclusion violates her First Amendment rights in a limited public forum.
• Amanda McGonigle sues JD Vance and Secret Service for alleged First Amendment violation at Bangor event — Amanda McGonigle, operator of the satirical Instagram account @CatsOnACouch, filed a lawsuit in US District Court in Maine on July 9, 2026, through the ACLU of Maine, alleging that she was denied entry to a vice-presidential event in Bangor on May 14, 2026, because of her online criticism of JD Vance. Court documents state Secret Service officers identified her by name and denied her access, telling her "We know where you stand." The complaint alleges First Amendment violation and retaliation for political speech.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Streever v. Mullin (D.D.C. 1:26-cv-02356) — David Streever, an author and journalist, filed a First Amendment complaint in federal court challenging an ICE "Warning Notice" issued after he emailed then-Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons criticizing the agency's defense of agents involved in the Alex Pretti shooting. The notice, allegedly delivered to his home and followed by agent surveillance and voicemails, asserted his email may violate federal criminal statutes and demanded he cease the conduct. Streever, represented by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), alleges the notice and agents' conduct constitute unconstitutional coercion, prior restraint, and First Amendment retaliation, and seeks declarations that his speech is protected and injunctions barring further coercive or retaliatory action.

Supporting reports

• CNN promotes Kalshi prediction markets without full disclosure — Since December 2025, CNN has aired at least 115 segments promoting Kalshi prediction markets, often suggesting their accuracy over other sources. These segments, part of a deal with Kalshi, are presented as typical advertising, but the financial relationship is more extensive. CNN's promotion of Kalshi includes segments like "The Odds," which frequently highlight Kalshi's predictions without adequately disclosing the financial ties, potentially misleading viewers about the independence of the content.
• CNBC fails to disclose financial ties with Kalshi in multiple articles — CNBC has published at least 22 articles about Kalshi without disclosing its financial relationship with the prediction market company. This includes articles published on June 10, June 11, June 15, June 16, June 23, June 26, July 1, and July 2, 2026. CNBC has a commercial relationship with Kalshi, which includes customer acquisition and a minority investment, meaning CNBC benefits financially from promoting Kalshi. The lack of disclosure raises concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest in CNBC's reporting.
• Kalshi's Financial Partnerships with CNN and CNBC Revealed — A joint investigation by Popular Information and Public Notice has revealed that Kalshi, a prediction market company, has financial partnerships with CNN and CNBC, which are not consistently disclosed to viewers. These partnerships involve Kalshi paying the networks to feature its data, despite the data being publicly available. The investigation documented over 20 instances where CNBC covered Kalshi without disclosing the financial relationship. CNBC claims it discloses the relationship when "directly relevant," but inconsistencies in disclosure were noted. CNN's deal with Kalshi is exclusive, preventing mention of competing prediction markets like Polymarket.