Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• DOJ investigates former intelligence officials — The Department of Justice launched investigations into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan, alleging they made false statements to Congress regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election. This move is part of a broader effort to undermine the credibility of intelligence agencies that have scrutinized Trump's actions.
• Attorney General Bondi launched criminal investigations into political opponents — Trump loyalist Attorney General Pam Bondi initiated criminal investigations into Senator Adam Schiff, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. The investigations were based on allegations of mortgage fraud made by William Pulte, head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. All three targets have denied the allegations. The investigations follow a pattern of targeting Trump's political opponents and critics.
• DOJ launched investigations into Comey and Brennan — The Department of Justice launched investigations of former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan, alleging they made false statements to Congress regarding the investigation into Russian operatives' attempts to assist Trump's 2016 campaign. The investigations represent a continuation of Trump's focus on the Russia investigation.

Supporting reports

• FBI forces out special agent Walter Giardina who worked on Trump and Navarro cases — The FBI, under director Kash Patel and deputy Dan Bongino, forced out special agent Walter Giardina, who had worked on cases involving Donald Trump and Peter Navarro, a top trade adviser to the president who was convicted of contempt of Congress. The ouster was part of a broader pattern of removals of senior FBI officials and agents under Patel's leadership.
• FBI pressures agent Michael Feinberg to resign or accept demotion over friendship with Peter Strzok — Special agent Michael Feinberg was told to resign or accept a demotion amid scrutiny from FBI leadership regarding his friendship with Peter Strzok, a lead agent on the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation who was fired by the Justice Department in 2018 after exchanging negative text messages about Trump with FBI lawyer Lisa Page.
• FBI subjects agents to polygraph exams under Patel leadership — Under FBI director Kash Patel and deputy Dan Bongino, numerous senior FBI officials and agents have been subjected to polygraph exams as part of aggressive personnel actions. Former officials report these moves have roiled the workforce and contributed to widespread angst among agents. Multiple senior agents in charge of field offices have been told to retire, resign, or accept reassignment.
• FBI DC field office head Steve Jensen terminated without stated cause — Steve Jensen, head of the FBI's Washington Field Office, announced in a farewell letter that his employment with the FBI will be terminated effective the next day. Jensen stated he received no explanation for the termination and pledged to meet the challenge with professionalism, integrity, and dignity. He urged colleagues to continue protecting the American people and upholding the Constitution.
• FBI forced out acting director Brian Driscoll and agent Walter Giardina — The New York Times reported that the FBI is forcing out at least two agents under Kash Patel's leadership, including Brian Driscoll, the former acting head of the bureau, and Walter Giardina, who was involved in Trump investigations. Driscoll sent a message to colleagues stating he was informed his employment would end the next day with no cause articulated. Driscoll had previously refused to carry out the Trump administration's plans for mass firing of January 6 agents.
• Trump administration ousts FBI official Brian Driscoll for resisting demands to name January 6 investigators — The Trump administration forced out Brian Driscoll, a senior FBI official who briefly served as acting director, after he resisted demands from the Justice Department for names of agents who investigated the January 6 Capitol riot. Driscoll and then-deputy director Rob Kissane had resisted the request, leading Justice Department official Emil Bove to accuse them of "insubordination." The FBI ultimately provided employee numbers rather than names. Driscoll's final day was Friday, August 8, 2025.

Supporting reports

• Trump's former lawyer Todd Blanche met twice with Ghislaine Maxwell regarding potential pardon — Trump's former lawyer Todd Blanche, now deputy attorney general at the Department of Justice, met twice with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a twenty-year sentence for sex trafficking and other charges. Maxwell indicated she will testify openly and honestly before Congress about Epstein if she receives a pardon. The meetings signal potential consideration of a pardon for Maxwell in exchange for testimony that could benefit Trump.
• Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviews Ghislaine Maxwell regarding Epstein case details — Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed Ghislaine Maxwell in Florida in what the White House characterized as an effort to uncover new details about Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after conviction on sex trafficking charges related to Epstein. This action follows Trump's authorization for the Justice Department to request release of transcripts from federal grand juries that indicted Epstein and Maxwell.

Supporting reports

• Republican senators warned Trump against pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell — Republican senators warned Trump and Attorney General Bondi that they should consider very carefully whether it would be a good idea to grant a pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a twenty-year sentence for sex trafficking and other charges. The warning came as Maxwell signaled willingness to testify before Congress if pardoned.

Supporting reports

• Corey Lewandowski becomes permanent DHS advisor with significant authority — Corey Lewandowski has become a permanent advisor to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, officially designated as a special government employee with limited term of service. DHS documents refer to him as the chief advisor to the secretary. Lewandowski has overseen employee dismissals, demanded administrative leave placements, called agency heads to "keep them in line," and approved billion-dollar FEMA grants. He frequently appears alongside Noem in official capacity, regularly bypasses Deputy Secretary Troy Edgar, and effectively acts as the department's second-in-command.

Supporting reports

• Attorney General Pam Bondi directed DOJ to open criminal grand jury investigation into Obama, Clinton, and Clapper — Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the Department of Justice to act on a criminal referral from Tulsi Gabbard and open a grand jury investigation into whether former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and others committed treason or other crimes when the government issued a report stating Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 election. The investigation's scope and potential charges remain unclear, and statutes of limitations for much of the conduct have lapsed.
• Attorney General Pam Bondi directed DOJ to investigate baseless claims by Tulsi Gabbard — Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the Justice Department to launch a grand jury investigation into baseless claims by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that former President Barack Obama and his administration manufactured intelligence regarding Trump and Russia in the 2016 presidential election.
• Attorney General Bondi directed U.S. attorney to present evidence to grand jury on Obama-era allegations — According to a Department of Justice official, Attorney General Pam Bondi signed an order directing a U.S. attorney to present evidence to a grand jury concerning allegations made by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that Obama administration officials manufactured evidence in 2016 to suggest Trump's campaign was connected to Russian operatives. The order represents a major escalation in the administration's effort to prosecute claims that Trump is a victim of political persecution.

Supporting reports

• Republican-controlled Senate confirmed Jeanine Pirro as US attorney for the District of Columbia — The Republican-controlled Senate voted to confirm Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News personality and judge, as US attorney for the District of Columbia. Pirro has a history of calling for the "cleansing" of the FBI and DOJ, spreading conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, and making xenophobic and Islamophobic comments about Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar, for which she was suspended from Fox News.
• Senate confirms Jeanine Pirro as US Attorney for Washington DC — The US Senate confirmed Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host and Trump ally who promoted false claims about the 2020 election, as the top federal prosecutor for Washington DC in a 50-45 party-line vote on Saturday. Pirro, a former New York district attorney and county judge, has been serving as interim US attorney since May. She was nominated after Trump withdrew his initial choice, conservative activist Ed Martin, due to opposition from Republican Senator Thom Tillis. Pirro's confirmation raises concerns about prosecutorial independence given her documented promotion of election fraud falsehoods and her close alignment with Trump.
• Senate confirms Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. — The Senate confirmed former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia by a vote of 50–45. No Democratic senator voted in favor of her confirmation. Pirro, a partisan media figure, will oversee federal prosecutions in the nation's capital, including cases involving federal crimes and matters arising from the Capitol.

Supporting reports

• Appeal filed — American Association of University Professors v. United States Department of Justice (S.D.N.Y.) 1:25-cv-02429 — Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil dismissed the case. That day, the Plaintiffs appealed to the Second Circuit.
• Appeal filed — Boyle v. Trump (D. Md.) 8:25-cv-01628 — Defendants appealed Judge Maddox's summary judgment order to the Fourth Circuit.
• Case update — American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO v. Goldstein (S.D.N.Y.) 1:25-cv-03072 — Plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint .
• Case update — Carter v. Department of Education (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00744 — The court stayed the case pending the status of appeals in State of New York v. McMahon , Civil Action No. 25-10601 (D. Mass.) and Somerville Public Schools v. Trump , Civil Action No. 25-10677 (D. Mass.).
• Case update — City of Chicago v. United States Department of Homeland Security (N.D. Ill.) 1:25-cv-05462 — Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint , adding Boston, Denver, San Francisco, and Seattle as plaintiffs. The amended filing described each city's reliance on the Securing the Cities program and the harms from DHS's freeze on 2025 reimbursements and failure to release approved 2024 funds, shifted emphasis from primarily APA claims to a stronger Appropriations Clause theory challenging DHS's withholding of congressionally allocated funds, and stressed the need to restore funding before major events requiring heightened security, including political conventions and national holidays.
• Case update — City of New York v. Trump et al. (S.D.N.Y.) 1:25-cv-01510 — Plaintiff filed their second amended complaint (redline here ).
• Case update — J.G.G. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00766 — Plaintiffs/Appellees filed their opposition in the D.C. Circuit to the Defendants'/Appellants' emergency motion seeking a stay of Judge Boasberg's June 4 order pending appeal.
• Case update — Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Trump (D. Alaska) 3:25-cv-00038 — Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint , which added the Conservation Law Foundation as a plaintiff.
• Motion granted — Democracy Forward Foundation v. Department of Education (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00940 — DOE answered Plaintiff's complaint, arguing that Plaintiff failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted, that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to grant relief authorized under FOIA, and that Plaintiff is not entitled to compel the release of records properly withheld under FOIA exclusions or exemptions, among other defenses.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Schiff v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10595 — Defendants filed a motion to dismiss , arguing that Plaintiffs' claims are moot in light of Defendants' compliance with the preliminary injunction order issued on May 23.
• House Judiciary Report on Trump Pardons — Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee released a report estimating that Trump's pardons have cost taxpayers over $1.3 billion in fines and restitution. The report highlights the financial impact of presidential pardons.
• R Kelly's Lawyers File Court Documents Alleging Overdose in Prison — Lawyers for R Kelly have filed new court documents alleging that the singer, who is serving a prison sentence for sex trafficking, was rushed to the hospital after overdosing on medication provided by prison staff. The filing claims that Kelly was placed in solitary confinement on June 10 and given medication with instructions to take it, leading to an overdose on June 13. The documents also allege a plot by Bureau of Prisons officials to have Kelly killed by another inmate, prompting a request for his release to home detention, which federal prosecutors have opposed.
• Case update — Project on Government Oversight, Inc. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00527 — Defendants filed an unopposed motion before Judge Boasberg seeking clarification or, alternatively, a stay of further proceedings. They argued that under 28 U.S.C. § 2243, no responsive pleading (return) is due in habeas proceedings until the court issues a writ or show-cause order, and that the preliminary-injunction briefing had already served that function. In the alternative, they requested that any requirement to file a return or dispositive motion be stayed until after the D.C. Circuit resolves the appeal of the June 4 order.
• Motion granted — Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Trump (D. Alaska) 3:25-cv-00038 — Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint or stay proceedings in the alternative.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Harris County Texas v. Robert F Kennedy Jr (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01275 — The court granted State of Alaska's motion to intervene . Judge Sharon Gleason ordered that the State of Alaska be admitted into the case as an intervenor-defendant.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Project on Government Oversight, Inc. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00527 — Judge Christopher Cooper issued a memorandum opinion that granted in part and denied in part Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. Judge Cooper granted relief to some of the grants held by four local-government plaintiffs (Harris County, Texas; Columbus, Ohio; Davidson County and Nashville, Tennessee; and Kansas City, Missouri) and decided against granting relief to all terminated grants nationwide. Defendants are enjoined from enforcing or otherwise giving effect to the March 2025 terminations of grants issued directly or indirectly to these four plaintiffs under the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2020, the CARES Act, and the CRRSAA.
• Temporary restraining order ruling — Association of American Universities v. Department of Defense (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-11740 — Judge James E. Boasberg denied Plaintiff's preliminary injunction motion. In the supporting memorandum , Judge Boasberg noted Plaintiff failed to show a likelihood of irreparable harm absent a preliminary injunction.
• Temporary restraining order ruling — National Job Corps Association v. Department of Labor (S.D.N.Y.) 1:25-cv-04641 — The Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order, prohibiting the DOD from enforcing the Rate Cap Policy.
• Case update — Association for Education Finance and Policy Inc. v. McMahon (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00999 — Judge Carter extended the temporary restraining order through June 25.
• Case update — CREW v. DOGE (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00511 — Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint . In this amended complaint, plaintiffs removed their ultra vires and Impoundment Act claims. Plaintiffs also added counts specifying the IES terminations and their associated alleged APA violation.
• Case update — Democracy Forward Foundation v. U.S. Department of the Treasury (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00684 — CREW filed a motion for summary disposition with the D.C. Circuit following the Supreme Court's Jun. 6 order.
• Complaint filed — EA T-B v. Bostock — Democracy Forward and the Department of the Treasury filed a joint status report to note the identification of 5,807 potentially responsive documents and the parties' efforts to further narrow Plaintiff's FOIA request to alleviate processing burdens and allow for a more expeditious processing of documents.
• Motion denied — Democracy Forward Foundation v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01535 — Defendants/Appellants filed their reply in support of their emergency motion in the D.C. Circuit to stay Judge Boasberg's June 4 order pending appeal.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — San Francisco Unified School District v. AmeriCorps, a.k.a. the Corporation for National and Community Service (N.D. Cal.) 3:25 — A complaint was filed in the Western District of Washington under the case caption EA T-B v. Bostock, docket number 2:25-cv-01192. The case involves legal challenges related to actions taken by the Trump administration. Further details about the case are forthcoming.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — W.J.C.C. v. Trump (W.D. Pa.) 3:25-cv-00153 — DOJ, DHS, and State Department (Agency Defendants) answered Plaintiff's complaint. The Agency Defendants admitted they received the FOIA requests but denied improperly withholding records from Plaintiff under FOIA.
• Summary judgment ruling — Grundmann v. Trump et al . (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00425 — The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, thereby enjoining Defendants from imposing and enforcing new conditions on Plaintiffs' AmeriCorps grants during the pendency of the lawsuit.
• Temporary restraining order ruling — Dvortsin as Next Friend of Hayam El Gamal et al., Petitioner, v. Noem (W.D. Tex.) 5:25-cv-00664 — Judge Stephanie Haines restated her holding in A.S.R. v. Trump , No. 3:25-cv-00113, that the presidential proclamation is a valid exercise of the AEA. Judge Haines, however, granted a preliminary injunction in favor of W.J.C.C., rejecting the government's claim that it could apply shortened notice akin to expedited removal procedures. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to: “(1) twenty-one (21) days' notice and an "opportunity to be heard," (2) notice that clearly articulates the fact that he is subject to removal under the Proclamation and the AEA, (3) notice in English and Spanish, the language of the one sought to be expelled, and if needed, Spanish-to-English interpreters shall be provided for any necessary hearings, and (4) notice of all of the foregoing to his counsel.” The court denied the petitioner's request for a preliminary injunction that would have barred the government from transferring him out of the district.
• Federal Appeals Court Rejects DOJ Representation for Trump — The D.C. Circuit issued an administrative stay of Judge Sparkle's March 12 order granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment .
• Federal Judge Blocks Education Department Firings — Judge Orlando Garcia granted a motion to extend the previous temporary restraining order blocking the removal of the family from the district or the United States.
• Federal Judge Blocks EPA Grant Cancellations — A federal appeals court rejected President Trump's request to have Justice Department lawyers represent him in his appeal of E. Jean Carroll's defamation case. The decision maintains the separation between personal and official legal matters.
• Case update — ACLU v. United States Social Security Administration (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01217 — A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from executing mass firings at the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights. The decision prevents potential disruptions to civil rights enforcement.
• Stay pending appeal decided — Newsom v. Trump (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-04870 — A federal judge blocked the EPA's cancellation of $600 million in environmental justice grants issued during the Biden administration. The ruling protects funding for underserved communities.
• Federal Judge Blocks Transportation Grant Conditions — Defendant Agencies answered Plaintiff's complaint. These agencies admitted that they failed to respond to Plaintiff's FOIA request, but provided several defenses to Plaintiff's action, including alleging Plaintiff is not entitled to compel the production of records under FOIA, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's requests, and that they did not improperly withhold the records Plaintiff requested under FOIA.
• Appeal filed — Mahmoud Khalil v. William P. Joyce et al. (D.N.J.) 2:25-cv-01963 — The Ninth Circuit granted the federal government a stay pending appeal .
• Motion denied — Darwin Antonio Arevalo Millan v. Trump (C.D. Cal.) 5:25-cv-01207 — A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from tying federal transportation grant funding to immigration enforcement cooperation. The ruling protects states' rights to manage their own policies.
• Motion granted — J.G.G. v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00766 — Judge Farbiarz ordered Mahmoud Khalil, who is currently detained by federal immigration authorities in Louisiana, be released from custody. On that same day, the government appealed Judge Farbiarz's June 11 order granting a preliminary injunction to the Third Circuit. Note: Mahmoud Khalil submitted a notice of claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act, seeking $20 million in damages from the administration for his detention. The notice alleges that Khalil's arrest and prolonged confinement were the result of discriminatory intent by Secretary Rubio, and that his treatment-including prolonged solitary confinement and denial of medical care-constituted multiple tortious acts by federal officers.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — American Federation of Government Employees, et al. v. Office of Personnel Management et al (S.D.N.Y.) 1:25-cv-01237 — Judge Holcomb denied petitioners' ex parte application for a writ of habeas corpus, noting petitioner's detention remains permissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) because of the government's intention to appeal the grant of relief in petitioner's removal proceedings (since petitioners can remain in custody pending such appeals).
• Preliminary injunction ruling — American Foreign Service Association v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-01030 — Judge Boasberg granted the Defendants unopposed motion for clarification, confirming that the Defendants does not need to take further action in the district court until the D.C. Circuit issues its mandate in the appeal of his June 4 order.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — American Oversight v. Hegseth (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00883 — In connection with the June 9 preliminary injunction order, Judge Cote ordered OPM to file a report within two weeks describing the procedures put in place since March 6, to ensure adherence to the requirements of the Privacy Act with respect to new grant of access permissions by OPM to records containing Plaintiffs' personally identifiable information (PII). Judge Cote also ordered OPM to file a report within four weeks concerning OPM's grant of access permissions to any records containing Plaintiffs' PII made to DOGE personnel.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Open Technology Fund v. Kari Lake (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-00840 — The D.C. Circuit en banc stayed the preliminary injunction order pending appeal.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-11472 — Judge Boasberg granted in part and denied in part the Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, granting a narrower relief by requiring that Defendants perform their mandatory notification and referral obligations, as explained in its accompanying memorandum opinion .
• Stay motion decided — State of New York v. United States Department of Education (S.D.N.Y.) 1:25-cv-02990 — Judge Royce Lamberth granted Plaintiff's preliminary injunction motion, thereby enjoining Defendants from withholding congressionally appropriated funds under the grant agreement for Fiscal Year 2024 between USAGM and OTF.
• Summary judgment ruling — Association of American Universities v. National Science Foundation (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-11231 — Judge Burroughs issued a preliminary injunction barring that administration from banning Harvard from participating in the State Department's Student and Visitor Exchange Program.
• Federal Judge Blocks Harvard Student Ban — The Second Circuit denied Defendants' motion to stay the district court's order, finding DOE's actions likely arbitrary and capricious under the APA-without any particularized assessment and insufficiently attentive to reliance interests-and concluding that a stay would substantially injure the plaintiff States.
• Federal Judge Orders Release of Mahmoud Khalil — The court granted Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Implementation of the 15% Indirect Cost Rate is vacated and declared invalid, arbitrary and capricious, and contrary to law. The court further ordered that within 72 hours of entry of this order, Defendants provide written notice of the order to all funding recipients affected by the 15% Indirect Cost Rate.
• — A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from prohibiting Harvard University from admitting international students. The ruling prevents the implementation of a plan to remove the school from the Student and Visitor Exchange Program.
• — A federal judge ordered the release of Mahmoud Khalil from ICE detention on bail, citing concerns that his detention was used as punishment for his activism. Khalil is a Palestinian green card holder involved in student protests.

Supporting reports

• House oversight committee seeks testimony from Biden's aides — The House oversight committee, led by Republican Representative James Comer, has requested transcribed interviews with five of Joe Biden's former senior advisers. The committee is investigating allegations of a cover-up regarding Biden's cognitive state and decision-making during his presidency. Comer has warned that subpoenas will be issued if the aides do not voluntarily schedule interviews. This inquiry is part of a larger Republican campaign to question the validity of Biden's actions as president.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department launches inquiry into Biden's clemencies — A separate inquiry has been initiated by Justice Department attorney Ed Martin into the clemencies issued by Joe Biden during his final days in office. The investigation focuses on pardons granted to family members and death row inmates. This action is part of a broader effort to scrutinize Biden's presidency and challenge the legitimacy of his executive decisions.

Supporting reports

• Motion to dismiss decided — New Mexico et al. v. Musk (D.D.C.) 1.25-cv-00429 — Judge Chutkan issued an order and memorandum opinion that granted Defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint against Trump but denied the motion to dismiss for all other Defendants.
• Federal Judge Rules Elon Musk Must Face Lawsuit Over DOGE — A federal judge ruled that Elon Musk must face a lawsuit filed by Democratic state attorneys general, claiming he is illegally wielding power through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in violation of the Appointments Clause. The judge dismissed Trump from the suit.
• U.S. District Judge rules against Trump administration in lawsuit involving Elon Musk — U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled that 14 states can proceed with their lawsuit against Elon Musk and the "Department of Government Efficiency," rejecting the administration's attempt to dismiss the case. Chutkan stated that the administration's actions were unauthorized by law and violated constitutional principles regarding appointments.

Supporting reports

• Senate Confirms Charles Kushner as US Ambassador to France — The Senate confirmed Charles Kushner, father of Jared Kushner, as the US Ambassador to France. Kushner was previously pardoned by Trump for tax evasion and other charges. This appointment raises questions about the influence of personal connections in diplomatic roles.
• US Senate confirms Charles Kushner as ambassador to France — The US Senate confirmed Charles Kushner as the ambassador to France with a 51-45 vote. Kushner, who was pardoned by former President Trump for tax evasion and other federal crimes, faced opposition from some senators, including Lisa Murkowski, a Republican who voted against his appointment. Despite his criminal past, Kushner's confirmation proceeded, marking him as the 10th foreign ambassador confirmed under Trump's administration. The appointment has drawn criticism due to Kushner's previous conviction and the perceived nepotism involved, as he is the father of Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

Supporting reports

• Judge rules Trump order targeting Perkins Coie unconstitutional — A federal judge, Beryl Howell, permanently struck down an executive order by Donald Trump that targeted the law firm Perkins Coie. The order was deemed unconstitutional, violating the first, fifth, and sixth amendments. The executive order had terminated government contracts with Perkins Coie and barred its attorneys from federal buildings, citing national security risks due to the firm's past work with Hillary Clinton's campaign. Judge Howell criticized the order as retaliatory and discriminatory, and the Trump administration is expected to appeal the decision.
• Judge blocks Trump's executive order against Perkins Coie — Judge Beryl Howell permanently barred the enforcement of Trump's executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie, which restricted federal hiring and access for its lawyers. Howell ruled that the order violated the Constitution and was null and void, citing First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment protections.
• Fed Judge strikes down Trump's executive order — Federal Judge Beryl Howell struck down Trump's executive order targeting the Perkins Coie law firm, stating that no American president has previously issued such orders against a law firm. The ruling emphasized the importance of constitutional freedoms, including free speech and due process.

Supporting reports

• Senators request ethics inquiry into Trump's $TRUMP contest — Senators Adam Schiff and Elizabeth Warren have requested an urgent inquiry by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics into President Trump's $TRUMP contest. They argue that the contest may violate federal ethics laws and constitutional prohibitions, including the federal bribery statute and emoluments clauses. The contest allows foreign actors to potentially buy influence with Trump without public disclosure of their identities, raising significant ethical and legal concerns.

Supporting reports

• Fed Chair Powell rejects Trump pressure to lower interest rates, citing tariff-driven economic uncertainty — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell announced he would not lower interest rates, citing the significant economic uncertainty caused by Trump's tariff increases, which he warned would produce higher inflation and slower growth. Trump responded with a post attacking Powell as "Too Late" and calling for his termination. Powell subsequently addressed Trump's threats directly, stating that Fed independence is protected by law and that the Fed will make decisions based solely on economic data and analysis, not political pressure. Powell received applause when he declared the Fed would never be influenced by political considerations.

Supporting reports

• Trump announces five major law firms agree to $600m pro bono work to avoid punitive executive orders — Donald Trump announced on Friday that five major law firms—Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins, Allen Overy Shearman Sterling, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, and Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft—agreed to provide $600m in combined pro bono legal work to Trump-backed causes and adopt hiring practices that do not consider race, in exchange for avoiding executive orders punishing them. The EEOC agreed to withdraw a March 17 diversity inquiry letter. This brings Trump's total secured pro bono commitments from law firms to $940m.

Supporting reports

• Trump signed executive order stopping enforcement of state climate laws — On April 8, 2025, Trump signed an executive order instructing the Department of Justice to "stop the enforcement" of state climate laws, which his administration suggested are unconstitutional or unenforceable. The order states "These State laws and policies are fundamentally irreconcilable with my Administration's objective to unleash American energy. They should not stand." The action represents Trump's attempt to preempt state climate initiatives.
• Trump administration freezes $790 million in federal funding to Northwestern University — The Trump administration froze $790 million in federal funding to Northwestern University as part of broader crackdowns on students and faculty members across US colleges who have expressed opposition to Israel's military operations in Gaza. The freeze targeted the university in response to activism and legal representation related to pro-Palestinian causes.
• White House freezes federal funding for Cornell and Northwestern universities — The Trump administration froze over $1 billion in federal funding for Cornell University and $790 million for Northwestern University, citing investigations into alleged "failure to protect Jewish students" following pro-Palestinian campus protests. The freeze includes grants and contracts from federal departments of health, education, agriculture, and defense. Cornell received over 75 stop-work orders from the Department of Defense affecting research in defense, cybersecurity, health, and cancer. The action follows warning letters sent to 60 universities in early March and comes after Cornell's president published a defiant op-ed defending academic freedom and free discourse.
• Princeton University reports suspension of federal research grants — Princeton University announced that dozens of its federal research grants were suspended over allegations that the university promoted antisemitism. This action follows similar defunding threats against Columbia and Harvard, representing a coordinated campaign against major research institutions.
• Trump administration announces cancellation of $400 million in grants and loans to Columbia University — The Trump administration announced the cancellation of $400 million in grants and loans to Columbia University, alleging the school failed to protect students from antisemitic harassment. In response, Columbia officials capitulated to a series of changes demanded by federal officials, sparking outrage from advocates and prompting at least one prominent academic to leave the institution.
• Trump administration announces plan to review $9 billion in Harvard University contracts and grants — The Trump administration announced a plan to review approximately $9 billion in contracts and multiyear grants to Harvard University over accusations that the university failed to protect Jewish students and promoted "divisive ideologies over free inquiry." The action follows the defunding of Columbia University and represents escalating pressure on major research institutions.
• Trump administration considers consent decree to place Columbia University under federal control — The Trump administration is reportedly considering placing Columbia University under a legally binding consent decree, a dramatic escalation following the university's acceptance of administration-demanded changes as a condition for restoring $400 million in suspended federal grants and contracts. The proposal originates from the administration's antisemitism taskforce, composed partly of Justice Department lawyers who question Columbia's good faith compliance. If Columbia resists, the Justice Department would need to present its case in court, risking prolonged litigation and continued funding withholding.
• Trump administration freezes nearly $1 billion in federal funding from Cornell University — During a cabinet meeting, President Trump pressed Education Secretary Linda McMahon on withholding federal funds from universities deemed "not behaving." McMahon confirmed the administration has frozen nearly $1 billion in funding from Cornell University and is investigating multiple institutions while holding back grant money pending compliance discussions with university presidents.
• Trump administration pauses $175 million in federal funding to University of Pennsylvania — The Trump administration paused $175 million in federal funding to the University of Pennsylvania over its inclusion of transgender athletes in women's college sports. This action represents another instance of defunding universities over policies the administration opposes.
• Trump administration demands Harvard surrender academic freedoms; Harvard refuses; administration retaliates by freezing $2.2bn in grants — The Trump administration (Departments of Education, HHS, and GSA) issued an 11 April demand letter to Harvard University president Alan Garber requiring sweeping reforms including installation of "viewpoint-diverse" faculty, elimination of DEI programs, and adoption of specific antisemitism definitions as conditions for continued federal funding. Harvard's legal team, citing First Amendment violations and constitutional limits on executive authority, rejected the demands as governmental overreach into academic freedom. Within hours, the administration froze $2.2bn in grants and a $60m contract in retaliation.
• Trump administration withheld Harvard University federal funding pending government control of admissions and intellectual content — On April 11, the Trump administration announced it would withhold $2.2 billion in grants already awarded and a $60 million contract from Harvard University unless the university permitted the federal government to control its admissions and intellectual content. The administration framed the action as addressing antisemitism. On April 22, Harvard filed suit against the departments of Health and Human Services, Justice, Education, Energy, and Defense, the General Services Administration, the National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, NASA, and their leaders, alleging violation of the First Amendment and abuse of legal authority.
• White House claims letter to Harvard withholding federal funds was "unauthorized" — On Friday, April 18, the administration claimed that a letter sent to Harvard University on April 11 withholding federal grants until the university granted administration officials power over the school's students and programs was "unauthorized." However, the White House simultaneously stated it was standing by the letter. The letter was signed by three federal officials, placed on official letterhead, and sent from the email of a senior federal official. Harvard responded by pointing out the letter's official provenance and noting that the government's actions had "real-life consequences."
• Harvard University rejected Trump administration demand for control over university governance — On April 11, 2025, Harvard University rejected the Trump administration's demand to regulate "intellectual and civil rights conditions" at Harvard, including its governance, admissions, programs, and extracurricular activities, in exchange for continuation of $2.2 billion in multiyear grants and a $60 million contract. Harvard's lawyers stated the university would not surrender its independence or relinquish constitutional rights and would not allow itself to be taken over by the federal government.

Supporting reports

• Senate passes resolution to rescind Trump Canada tariffs with bipartisan support — The Senate passed a resolution 51-48 to block Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada, with four Republicans—Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell, and Rand Paul—joining all Democrats. The measure would terminate the national emergency on fentanyl that Trump invoked to justify the tariffs. Trump announced sweeping new tariffs on Wednesday and vowed not to sign the resolution if it reached his desk. The House, controlled by Republicans, is unlikely to pass similar legislation.
• Four Republican senators vote to rescind Canada tariffs via Democratic resolution — Four Republican senators—Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski—voted in favor of a Democratic Senate resolution (tabled by Tim Kaine) to rescind the 25% tariffs on Canadian products, defying Trump's public appeal against the measure. The resolution lacks force of law but signals deep party fracture over tariff policy.
• Senate passes resolution to block tariffs on Canadian products — The Senate passed a resolution to block Trump's tariffs on Canadian products. Four Republicans—Susan Collins (ME), Mitch McConnell (KY), Lisa Murkowski (AK), and Rand Paul (KY)—joined Democrats to pass the measure. House Speaker Mike Johnson indicated he is unlikely to bring the measure to a vote in the House, effectively preventing congressional override of the tariff declaration.
• Senate passes resolution to eliminate Trump tariffs on Canadian imports — On April 2, the Senate passed a resolution to eliminate Trump's tariffs on Canadian imports, with Republicans Mitch McConnell, Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, and Rand Paul joining all Democrats to support the resolution. The bipartisan vote reflected congressional opposition to the tariff policy.
• Trump demands Senate Republicans vote against tariff resolution on Truth Social — Trump posted on Truth Social demanding Senate Republicans vote to keep the national emergency in effect to "finish the job" on tariffs. He attacked Senator Kaine and warned that Democratic victory on the resolution would be "devastating for the Republican Party and, far more importantly, for the United States." The post represented direct presidential pressure on his party's senators to block the bipartisan resolution.
• Senate Republicans consider joining Democrats on resolution to terminate Trump's emergency tariff order on Canada — Democratic Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution to terminate Trump's emergency order justifying tariffs on Canadian imports, citing fentanyl concerns. Several Senate Republicans, including Rand Paul and Susan Collins, signaled support or co-sponsorship. Trump responded with a Truth Social post demanding Republicans vote to keep the emergency in effect. Senate Majority Leader John Thune prepared to urge Republicans to oppose the resolution. A vote was expected as early as Tuesday or Wednesday.

Supporting reports

• Cory Booker delivers 25-hour Senate speech condemning Trump administration — Democratic Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey broke the Senate record for longest solo speech, speaking for 25 hours and 5 minutes beginning Monday evening. His speech was not a filibuster but a public warning against what he characterized as grave threats to democracy posed by the Trump administration's policies, including spending cuts, attempts to abolish the Department of Education, judicial bypass attempts, and removal of critics. Booker called on Congress to hold the executive branch accountable.
• Cory Booker delivers 25-hour Senate speech protesting Trump administration — Senator Cory Booker delivered a record-breaking 25-hour speech on the Senate floor from March 31 through April 1, 2025, presenting a litany of protests against the Trump administration's actions in its first 71 days. The speech required continuous physical presence without sitting or breaks, functioning as an act of political protest and civil disobedience. Booker acknowledged Democratic failures and called for the party to do better.
• Senator Cory Booker conducted 25-hour Senate filibuster defending democracy — Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) held the Senate floor for 25 hours and 5 minutes beginning March 31, 2025, delivering a coherent speech about threats to American democracy under the Trump administration. He detailed administration violations including constitutional breaches, harm to farmers through loss of government contracts, environmental protection cuts affecting public health, housing affordability crises, education and medical research cuts, national security breaches, and an erroneous deportation of a legal resident. Booker invoked civil rights history and called on Americans to resist normalization of the current moment.
• Senator Cory Booker delivered extended floor speech declaring national crisis — On March 31, Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) spoke on the Senate floor beginning at 7:00 p.m., stating "I believe sincerely that our country is in crisis" and declaring "These are not normal times in America. And they should not be treated as such in the United States Senate." Booker's extended remarks signaled Democratic concern about the trajectory of governance and institutional norms.
• Senator Cory Booker delivered longest speech in congressional history attacking Trump administration — At 7:00 p.m. on March 31, 2025, Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) launched a marathon speech attacking the Trump administration and urging Republicans to defend democracy. The speech lasted twenty-five hours, concluding on April 1, 2025, making it the longest speech in congressional history. The speech received 400 million likes on TikTok, indicating massive public engagement with the message.
• Senator Cory Booker delivers 25-hour Senate speech in obstruction of Trump administration policies — Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) conducted a 25-hour and 4-minute speech on the Senate floor beginning at 7pm Monday, breaking the previous record of 24 hours and 18 minutes held by segregationist Strom Thurmond. Though not technically a filibuster (no bill was under vote), Booker deliberately obstructed Senate business to protest Trump administration actions, including economic chaos, billionaire influence, Elon Musk's unilateral cuts to federal programs affecting vulnerable groups, executive overreach, press intimidation, and democratic erosion. Democrats responded with standing ovations and solidarity.
• Sen. Cory Booker conducted a 25-hour Senate floor speech, breaking the record for longest Senate speech in U.S. history. — Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) delivered a marathon 25-hour speech on the Senate floor, surpassing the previous record of 24 hours and 18 minutes set by Sen. Strom Thurmond in 1957 (who was opposing a civil rights bill). Booker's speech called attention to damage caused by Trump and Musk, criticized the President's treatment of disabled people and pattern of lying, and called for Democratic Party self-reflection. Unlike Thurmond, Booker did not leave the floor to use the restroom or eat, maintaining continuous presence throughout. The speech was widely interpreted as both a protest against Trump's policies and a potential opening move in a challenge to Chuck Schumer's leadership of Senate Democrats.
• Senator Cory Booker delivers record-length Senate speech on democracy crisis — Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) began a speech on Monday in the Senate addressing what he characterized as a national crisis and concluded just over 25 hours later on Tuesday, setting a new record for the longest individual Senate speech. In the address, Booker urged Americans to speak up for democracy and to "be bolder in America with a vision that inspires with hope," framing civic engagement as essential to the nation's democratic health.
• Senator Cory Booker conducted extended Senate floor action on unspecified legislation — Senator Cory Booker held the Senate floor for more than 25 hours, citing constituent opposition to autocracy and extremism as his motivation. The article describes this action as having "changed history" and "burst through the wall of inertia which has crippled the Senate," though the specific legislation or issue under debate is not identified in the text provided.

Supporting reports

• American Association of University Professors and American Federation of Teachers sue Trump administration over Columbia funding cancellation — The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), two unions representing faculty, filed suit against the Trump administration on behalf of their members at Columbia University in response to the $400 million federal funding cancellation. The lawsuit challenges the administration's use of funding withdrawal as leverage to compel the university to suppress pro-Palestinian speech and academic activity. The legal action represents organized faculty resistance to the federal coercion of academic institutions.

Supporting reports

• Trump revokes executive order targeting Paul Weiss law firm after firm agrees to policy changes — President Trump signed Executive Order 14244 on March 21, 2025, revoking Executive Order 14237 (issued March 14, 2025), which had targeted Paul Weiss law firm over alleged undermining of the judicial process. The revocation followed the firm's agreement to adopt political neutrality in client selection and hiring, expand pro bono work across the political spectrum, eliminate diversity-equity-inclusion policies in favor of merit-based hiring, and commit $40 million in pro bono services during Trump's term, including support for veterans and anti-Semitism efforts.
• Trump revokes executive order addressing Paul Weiss — President Donald Trump issued an executive order on March 21, 2025, revoking a previous order (Executive Order 14237) that addressed risks associated with the law firm Paul Weiss. The revocation follows Paul Weiss's commitment to policy changes, including political neutrality in client selection and attorney hiring, and a $40 million pro bono commitment to support various causes. This action reflects a shift in the firm's approach to align with principles of equality and justice, prompting the revocation of the earlier order targeting the firm.
• White House revokes executive order targeting Paul Weiss law firm after firm agrees to policy changes — The White House issued Executive Order 14244 revoking Executive Order 14237 (issued March 14, 2025), which had targeted Paul Weiss law firm. The order states that Paul Weiss has agreed to adopt political neutrality in client selection and hiring, expand pro bono work across the political spectrum, replace diversity-equity-inclusion policies with merit-based hiring, and commit $40 million in pro bono services during the presidential term to support veterans, justice system fairness, and anti-Semitism efforts.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order on Paul Weiss Risks — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14237 to address risks associated with the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. The order mandates a review of security clearances for individuals at Paul Weiss, cessation of government services to the firm, and a review of government contracts involving the firm. The order aims to prevent taxpayer funds from supporting activities deemed harmful to American interests, including racial discrimination and actions inconsistent with national security.
• Executive Order: Addressing Risks From Paul Weiss — President Donald Trump issued an executive order on March 14, 2025, targeting the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. The order mandates a review and potential suspension of security clearances for individuals at the firm, citing national interest concerns. It also directs federal agencies to cease providing goods and services to Paul Weiss and to review and potentially terminate contracts with the firm. The order aims to prevent taxpayer dollars from supporting activities deemed inconsistent with American interests, including alleged racial discrimination and actions against national security.
• Trump signed executive order targeting law firm Paul Weiss with security clearance suspensions, contract terminations, and personnel restrictions. — President Trump signed an executive order on March 14, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by Paul Weiss employees, terminate government contracts with the firm, restrict employee access to federal buildings, and limit hiring of firm personnel. The order cites the firm's representation of January 6 defendants, employment of former prosecutor Mark Pomerantz, and alleged racial discrimination in hiring. Agencies must submit compliance assessments within 30 days.
• White House issues fact sheet on executive order suspending security clearances for Paul Weiss law firm employees — The White House published a fact sheet stating that President Trump signed an executive order suspending security clearances held by employees of Paul Weiss law firm and attorney Mark Pomerantz, pending review of whether such clearances align with the national interest. The order directs the federal government to halt material and services to the firm, restrict building access, terminate contracts, and refrain from hiring its employees unless authorized. The fact sheet characterizes the firm's practices as warranting civil rights review under Title VII.

Supporting reports

• District Judge Howell blocks enforcement of Trump executive order against Perkins Coie — On 12 March, federal District Judge Beryl Howell issued a ruling blocking the Trump administration from enforcing key parts of its executive order against law firm Perkins Coie. The judge stated the order "runs head-on into the wall of first amendment protections," finding that the punitive sanctions violated constitutional protections for attorneys and their clients.
• Judge blocks Trump order against Perkins Coie — A federal judge, Beryl Howell, temporarily blocked a significant portion of an executive order issued by Donald Trump. The order targeted the law firm Perkins Coie, which had ties to Hillary Clinton, by stripping its lawyers of security clearances and barring federal engagement with them. Howell ruled that Trump's use of national security as a pretext to punish the firm was unjustified and likened it to a "bill of attainder," which is unconstitutional. The restraining order halts most of the executive order's effects, except for the revocation of clearances.

Supporting reports

• Court rules Trump’s firing of labor board official illegal — A federal court ruled that Donald Trump's firing of Gwynne Wilcox, a senior official at the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), was illegal. The court ordered her reinstatement, stating that the president does not have the authority to terminate NLRB members at will. The ruling emphasized that the president is not a king and must adhere to constitutional limits. Wilcox's removal had left the NLRB without a quorum, affecting its ability to function. The court's decision reinforces the independence of the NLRB and the rule of law.
• Summary judgment ruling — Gwynne A. Wilcox v. Donald J. Trump et al (D.C. Cir.) 1:25-cv-00334 — Judge Beryl Howell granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and denied the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment. The court issued a declaratory judgment that Wilcox's firing was unlawful and that she remains a member of the NLRB; the court further ordered that Wilcox be allowed to continue to serve in office unless removed for cause under the NLRA, and enjoined defendants from removing Wilcox or impeding her from executing her duties.
• Federal court rules Trump's firing of labor chief illegal — A federal court ruled that President Trump's firing of Gwynne Wilcox, a senior official at the National Labor Relations Board, was illegal. The court ordered her reinstatement, marking a significant legal setback for the administration. This ruling underscores the limits of presidential power in removing officials and reinforces the independence of labor oversight bodies.

Supporting reports

• SEC halts prosecution of Justin Sun — The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) halted its prosecution of Justin Sun, a Chinese cryptocurrency entrepreneur charged with securities fraud, following his financial contributions to Trump, raising concerns about political influence on regulatory actions.
• SEC halts fraud prosecution of Chinese national — The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has halted its fraud prosecution against Chinese crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun. Sun, who was charged in March 2023 with marketing unregistered securities and manipulating the crypto market, had recently invested $75 million in World Liberty Financial (WLF), a venture backed by Donald Trump. This investment resulted in a significant financial benefit for Trump. The SEC and Sun filed a joint request for a 60-day stay to explore a potential resolution, which was granted by a federal judge. This development raises questions about the SEC's enforcement actions and potential settlements.