Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Eric Deters files defamation lawsuit against Kimberly Guilfoyle and announces plans to depose Don Jr. — Eric Deters, the donor at the center of the Guilfoyle controversy, filed a defamation lawsuit against Guilfoyle and announced plans to depose her and Don Jr. In a video released on October 15, Deters claimed he would present a 16-minute phone conversation that contains information that "might just bring down the entire Trump administration." Deters stated he had supported Trump from the beginning and framed his legal action as an effort to clear his name.
• Eric Deters files defamation lawsuit against Kimberly Guilfoyle; announces recording release — Attorney Eric Deters filed a defamation lawsuit against Kimberly Guilfoyle in circuit court in Kentucky and announced he will release a 16-minute phone recording tomorrow that he claims will damage the Trump administration and potentially end the 2028 Vance-Rubio ticket. Deters is seeking a public apology and $1 million in damages. He stated the recording involves a conversation he had with Guilfoyle from Greece and compared the expected fallout to a major scandal in the Trump administration.

Supporting reports

• Arlington County filed lawsuit against Trump's triumphal arch project — Arlington County Board in Virginia filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to block the construction of the President's proposed triumphal arch in Washington, DC. Lawyers for the county cited concerns about the project's impact on the county and its residents, as well as on tourists. Arlington County is home to the Pentagon and Arlington National Cemetery. The lawsuit stated that "The Trump-Vance Administration has made it a priority to remake the physical landscape of the Nation's Capital in President Trump's image and based on his whims, destroying treasured public spaces in the process."

Supporting reports

• Democratic National Committee sues Trump administration over taxpayer-funded campaign ads — The Democratic National Committee filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Wednesday, October 8, 2026, challenging the Trump administration's use of taxpayer funds to broadcast campaign ads promoting President Trump. The ads, costing over $12 million, allegedly violate federal law prohibiting use of congressionally appropriated money for "publicity or propaganda." The complaint names Trump, the White House office, the Office of Management and Budget, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection as defendants, alleging they violated the Administrative Procedure Act and misused public funds for self-aggrandizement during the midterm campaign season.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security, et al. (S.D.N.Y. 1:26-cv-08882) — Common Cause, Alabama House candidate Robert Hunter, SEIU Local 32BJ, and its PAC filed suit in the Southern District of New York challenging a $20 million Department of Homeland Security contract with a marketing firm to produce and air national television advertisements featuring President Trump. The ads, funded through an Office of Management and Budget reapportionment of Customs and Border Protection appropriations, began airing Sept. 23, 2026, and are labeled "Paid for by the U.S. Government." Plaintiffs allege the ads violate the Purpose Statute and the publicity-or-propaganda ban, constitute arbitrary and capricious agency action, and violate the Fifth Amendment's equal protection guarantee by providing competitive advantage to Trump-aligned candidates in the 2026 midterm elections. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief, vacatur of the apportionment and contract, a temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunctions, and recovery of expended funds.

Supporting reports

• Judge dismisses reflecting pool case against David Hearn with prejudice — Judge Todd Edelman of DC Superior Court dismissed charges against former Olympic canoeist David Hearn over alleged damage to the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool, ruling the case could not be refiled. The US Attorney's office, led by Trump ally Jeanine Pirro, had already conceded the damage resulted from flawed installation, not Hearn's actions. Trump had publicly pressured for prosecution in August, calling Pirro's decision to drop charges a failure. The court found prosecutors lacked factual support and acted under political pressure.
• Judge dismisses DOJ vandalism case against David Hearn with prejudice — A judge dismissed with prejudice the Department of Justice's Reflecting Pool vandalism case against former Olympian David Hearn. The judge warned that leaving the door open could expose Hearn to a "meritless, politically motivated prosecution" and what would "objectively" be harassment.
• Judge dismisses case against David Hearn with prejudice — Judge Todd E. Edelman dismissed the government's case against Olympian David Hearn with prejudice, meaning it cannot be resurrected. The government had accused Hearn of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, although the contractors themselves acknowledged they were responsible for its torn lining. After the government acknowledged there was no merit in the prosecution, Trump continued to insist Hearn should be prosecuted. The judge stated the dismissal was necessary to protect Hearn from "what, objectively, would be harassment" from his own government and from the "extraordinary possibility that Mr. Hearn will nonetheless face a meritless, politically motivated prosecution."

Supporting reports

• Jack Smith testifies before Senate Judiciary Committee; Republicans attack his prosecutorial record — Former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on 29 September 2026 regarding his two federal investigations into Donald Trump. Republican senators, including Eric Schmitt, John Kennedy, and Ted Cruz, launched aggressive attacks on Smith's conduct, making accusations of perjury (based on a false claim about an Atlanta Hawks game), bias, and targeting of Republicans. Smith defended his prosecutorial decisions and denied allegations that he was politically motivated. Democratic senators defended Smith and highlighted the January 6 Capitol attack.
• Jack Smith testified before Senate Judiciary Committee on Trump investigations — Special Counsel Jack Smith testified under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding his investigations into Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his retention of classified documents. Smith defended the independence and factual basis of his prosecutions, stating that grand juries in two separate districts had found sufficient evidence of criminal activity. He emphasized that his decisions were based solely on facts and law, not political affiliation, and warned that the rule of law faces unprecedented challenges, including threats of prosecution against individuals perceived as opposing the President and vilification of career prosecutors and FBI agents on his team.
• Jack Smith testified before Senate Judiciary Committee on DOJ investigation of Trump — Special Counsel Jack Smith appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 29, 2026, to testify about the DOJ's investigation into former President Trump. In his opening remarks, Smith stated that the investigation had developed "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump engaged in serious crimes, including a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election results and prevent the lawful transfer of power. Smith also noted that since January 2025, there had been attacks on the institutions and public servants involved in the investigation, and that he himself had been threatened with jail by the sitting president.

Supporting reports

• Trump-appointed director pursued plan to replace Kennedy Center art collection with Trump-patron selections — Richard Grenell, Trump's first appointed director of the Kennedy Center, pursued a plan to replace works in the center's art collection—including gifts from foreign nations honoring Kennedy—with art selected by Trump patrons. The plan had not been previously reported.

Supporting reports

• US Supreme Court permits Trump White House ballroom construction to continue — The US Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling permitting the Trump administration to block a lower court order that had halted above-ground construction of a controversial $400 million White House ballroom. The conservative majority found that the National Trust for Historic Preservation lacked standing to challenge the project, sidestepping the question of whether Congress had authorized the demolition of the historic East Wing. Chief Justice Roberts and three liberal justices dissented, arguing the project likely violated separation of powers and congressional authority over federal property.
• Supreme Court allows Trump White House ballroom construction to proceed — By a 5–4 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the National Trust for Historic Preservation lacked legal standing to challenge Trump's construction of a ballroom at the White House. The majority cited national security considerations as favoring construction. Chief Justice Roberts dissented, writing that the project is "likely unlawful" and that the White House's iconic status requires adherence to legal procedures for alterations. The ruling permits construction to advance before the legality question is resolved.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. National Park Service (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-04316 — The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 per curiam ruling, granted the government's application for a stay of the district court's preliminary injunction pending disposition of the government's forthcoming petition for certiorari, holding that the government was likely to show the National Trust lacked Article III standing to challenge the East Wing construction project and the government would likely suffer irreparable harm without a stay, with the balance of equities tipping in its favor. The Court noted it did “not pass upon the legality of the government's East Wing project.” Chief Justice Roberts, joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, dissented , arguing the National Trust has adequate standing and the construction likely violates 40 U. S. C. §8106's requirement of express congressional authorization for building new structures on federal park land in D.C., which Congress has not necessarily provided.
• Supreme Court releases opinion in National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States (26A203) — The Supreme Court released an official slip opinion in National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States. Docket number(s): 26A203.

Supporting reports

• Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approved bank charter for World Liberty Financial — Late Friday night, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approved a preliminary charter for World Liberty Financial (WLF), a cryptocurrency venture launched by the Trump family and close allies the Witkoff family, to become a bank. The charter permits WLF to issue USD1, a stablecoin, and to manage customer assets and settle payments. Reuters reports WLF had funneled more than $1.6 billion to Trump and his family as of April 2026.
• Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approved Trump family crypto business banking charter — The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, led by Trump appointee Jonathan Gould, announced conditional approval for World Liberty Financial—a crypto venture controlled by the Trump family—to receive a banking charter. This will allow WLF to issue stablecoin tokens inside the U.S. without an intermediary. Trump made $65 million in 2025 selling WLF shares and nearly $600 million selling stablecoins through the venture, according to financial disclosures.

Supporting reports

• DOJ moves to dismiss charges against David Hearn — The Department of Justice filed to dismiss criminal charges against David Hearn, a former Olympian accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The DOJ's filing stated that the damage was due to flawed installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings, rather than vandalism. This move follows a series of events where the Trump administration blamed Hearn for the pool's issues, despite evidence suggesting the problems stemmed from the renovation process itself.
• Dismissal of DOJ Case Against David Hearn — The Department of Justice case against David Hearn for vandalism of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was dismissed after his lawyers argued that the government's witness testified the pool was already damaged before Hearn approached it. They claimed irregularities in the grand jury's proceedings, suggesting that the indictment may have been influenced by misconduct. This dismissal raises concerns about the integrity of the DOJ's handling of grand jury processes.
• Trump Administration Drops Charges Against Lincoln Memorial Vandalism Defendants — Federal prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's office, led by Jeanine Pirro, moved to dismiss misdemeanor charges against three defendants accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. This follows a previous decision to drop felony charges against former Olympian David Hearn for similar accusations. The decision has reportedly caused tension within the Trump administration.
• DOJ dismisses felony charge against David Hearn in reflecting pool case — The Trump administration's Department of Justice moved to dismiss a felony property destruction charge against former Olympic canoeist David Hearn on Friday, citing newly obtained Interior Department documents showing the pool liner damage resulted from faulty contractor installation, not vandalism. Hearn had been arrested on June 19 and faced up to 10 years in prison. US Attorney Jeanine Pirro's office filed a 20-page motion stating the damage stemmed from a "rushed and flawed installation process." President Trump publicly criticized Pirro's decision, saying she "choked" and "folded like an umbrella," sparking speculation about her job security.
• Charges Dropped Against Three Accused of Vandalism — Charges have been dropped against three individuals who were falsely accused of destroying the reflecting pool. This development comes amid political tensions and accusations of misinformation.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders Trump to divulge financial details in BBC defamation lawsuit discovery — US magistrate judge Enjoliqué Lett ruled during a discovery hearing that Donald Trump must disclose detailed financial information from his businesses as part of his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC. The ruling stems from Trump's 2025 lawsuit over a 2024 BBC documentary that edited footage of his January 6 speech. The judge also authorized the BBC to subpoena dozens of Trump associates, including family members and advisers like Donald Trump Jr., Steve Bannon, and Stephen Miller, to investigate Trump's intentions on January 6. Trump's legal team indicated it will appeal the decision and attempt to amend the complaint to narrow the scope.

Supporting reports

• House Judiciary Chair Jordan Urges Prosecution of Former Special Counsel Jack Smith — House Judiciary Committee chair Jim Jordan sent a letter to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche urging the Trump Justice Department to prosecute former special counsel Jack Smith, alleging he made false statements during closed-door testimony. Smith's lawyers countered that the referral reflects "a chilling eagerness to weaponize the justice system by attacking a career, nonpartisan public servant." The allegation centers on Smith's testimony regarding how his office obtained congressional text messages, with Republicans claiming he knowingly lied by not mentioning a NARA subpoena.
• House Judiciary Committee refers Jack Smith for criminal investigation — House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the acting attorney general for alleged perjury, claiming Smith made false statements to Congress about access to lawmakers' phone records during testimony in December 2025 and January 2026. Jordan asserted that DOJ documents revealed Smith's team had access to text messages of 44 members of Congress, contradicting Smith's prior testimony that they only had "toll records." Smith's attorneys denied the allegations, characterizing the referral as weaponization of the justice system and retaliation for investigating Trump.

Supporting reports

• Todd Blanche confirmation hearing for attorney general — Todd Blanche, Trump's personal attorney and acting attorney general since April 2026, faced Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings on July 15–16. He downplayed his relationship with Trump, defended his handling of Epstein files (which contained redaction errors exposing survivor identities), and addressed a $1.8 billion "slush fund" settlement with the IRS that granted Trump and family immunity from tax audits. A federal judge had excoriated the settlement as collusive. Blanche also faced questions on January 6 clemencies, the transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell to minimum security, and the arrest of Newark's mayor at an ICE facility.
• Ex-DOJ lawyer testifies that Todd Blanche fired her for refusing to restore gun rights to Trump ally — Liz Oyer, former pardon attorney, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Todd Blanche, Trump's nominee for attorney general, terminated her employment after she refused to recommend restoring firearms rights to actor Mel Gibson, a Trump ally with a domestic violence conviction. Blanche denied the firing was retaliatory, claiming her decisions were inconsistent with Trump's authority. Oyer called his statement "provably false" and urged senators to reject his nomination, alleging he is weaponizing DOJ as Trump's personal law firm.

Supporting reports

• Judge orders release of $5.8m judgment to E Jean Carroll after Trump's Supreme Court appeal fails — Manhattan federal court Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered the disbursement of $5.8 million (principal plus accrued interest) that Donald Trump owes E Jean Carroll following her 2023 civil verdict against him for sexual abuse and defamation. Trump had deposited the funds into a court-controlled account pending appeals. After the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review Trump's appeal on June 29, 2026, the conditions of the escrow agreement were met, triggering the judge's order to release the funds. Trump filed notice of appeal within an hour of the order.
• Kennedy Center ruling issued against Trump — A ruling was issued by the Kennedy Center against President Trump on or before July 8, 2026. The article does not provide details of the ruling's substance or outcome.
• Judge ordered release of $5.8 million to E. Jean Carroll — A judge ordered the release of $5.8 million to E. Jean Carroll—the $5 million a jury awarded her in 2023 plus interest—after the Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal of the verdict finding him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote that Trump "has been stalling this case for years." Trump's lawyers requested an appeals court pause the payment the same day, and the court refused Wednesday night.
• Court releases $5.6m in damages owed by Trump to E Jean Carroll — A Manhattan federal court released $5.6 million in damages that Donald Trump owes to E Jean Carroll following her 2023 sexual abuse and defamation verdict against him. The funds, held in a court escrow account (CRIS), were released on July 9 after Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered their disbursement. Trump had fought the release since June, following the Supreme Court's June 29 denial of his appeal request. Carroll's legal team requested the release immediately after the Supreme Court's decision, and the judge denied Trump's request for additional time to respond.
• Judge Kaplan orders release of $5.8m judgment to E Jean Carroll; Trump appeals — US District Judge Lewis Kaplan issued an order directing the disbursement of $5.8 million (principal plus 11% post-judgment interest) held in a court-controlled account, which a jury awarded to E Jean Carroll in her 2023 sexual abuse and defamation civil trial against Trump. Trump had requested the judge delay or deny the release, arguing it would cause him "irreparable harm," but Kaplan rejected the request within 24 hours. Trump immediately filed notice of appeal of the disbursement order.
• US appeals court rejects Trump's bid to delay E Jean Carroll payment — A Manhattan federal appeals court rejected Donald Trump's emergency request to delay payment of $5.8 million (principal plus accrued interest) owed to E Jean Carroll following her 2023 sexual abuse and defamation trial victory. Trump filed the delay request hours after Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered the release of funds held in a court-controlled account since June 2023. The Second Circuit's rejection came after the Supreme Court denied Trump's certiorari petition on June 29, exhausting his appellate remedies.
• Judge Lewis Kaplan orders Trump to pay E. Jean Carroll judgment — Judge Lewis Kaplan issued an order requiring Trump to finally pay the judgment in the E. Jean Carroll defamation case. The order represents enforcement of a civil judgment against the sitting president.

Supporting reports

• Stay pending appeal decided — Beatty v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-04480 — The D.C. Circuit denied the government's motion for a stay pending appeal, finding that they had failed to show irreparable harm from compliance with the district court's order requiring removal of President Trump's name from the Kennedy Center's facade, website title, and trademark applications.
• Federal appeals court ruled Trump name must remain on Kennedy Center — A federal appeals court ruled that Trump's name must remain on the Kennedy Center while his administration appeals the order that forced its removal. The three-judge panel found the administration offered no specific facts or evidence for its claim that losing the Trump name would harm the center's finances.
• Federal appeals court rejects Trump administration request to pause Kennedy Center name removal — A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously rejected the Trump administration's emergency request to pause a lower court order requiring removal of Trump's name from the Kennedy Center's facade. The administration had argued the removal would harm fundraising and the institution's finances. The court found the administration provided no specific facts or evidence to support its claims and barred assertions that a newly created Trump Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts Foundation would need to return money if the name remained removed.

Supporting reports

• Congressional investigation found Trump administration misused 250th anniversary celebration — A congressional investigation titled "From Vanity to Insanity: How the WH Cheated the American People Out of Their 250th Birthday" found that Trump staged a hostile takeover of the United States' 250th anniversary celebration to enrich political allies, harvest voter data, and promote Christian nationalist ideology. The report outlined a web of alleged corruption, wire fraud, and pay-to-play schemes orchestrated through a shadow corporation embedded within the National Park Service.
• House Democratic subcommittee releases report alleging Trump administration hijacked US 250th anniversary celebration for corruption, partisan gain, and ideological purposes — A House Democratic natural resources subcommittee released an interim report titled "From Vanity to Insanity" alleging that the Trump administration orchestrated a hostile takeover of the US semiquincentennial (250th anniversary) celebration. The report documents alleged corruption, wire fraud, pay-to-play schemes, and misuse of the National Park Foundation (NPF) through a shadow corporation called Freedom 250. The administration allegedly diverted resources from the non-partisan America250 Foundation, installed campaign operatives on the NPF board, misled donors, steered federal contracts to Trump loyalists, harvested voter data through event registration, and replaced civic programming with Christian nationalist content while erasing historical narratives about slavery and Indigenous removal from national parks.
• House Democrats released report on Freedom 250 corruption allegations — Democrats on the House Natural Resources Committee, led by Rep. Jared Huffman, released a report titled "From Vanity to Insanity" accusing Trump's allies of turning the nation's 250th birthday into a "hotbed of corruption and self-enrichment." The report alleges that when the bipartisan America250 commission would not bend to Trump, the White House created a rival group, Freedom 250, and placed it inside the National Park Foundation to avoid transparency rules. The report describes alleged wire fraud (donors directed to Freedom 250 instead of America250), selling presidential access through sponsorship packages, soliciting foreign money, and steering contracts to Trump allies. Freedom 250 denies the allegations.

Supporting reports

• Trump-appointed Kennedy Center board voted to fight order removing Trump's name — A federal judge previously ruled that Congress named the Kennedy Center and only Congress can rename it, ordered Trump's name removed by June 13, and blocked a planned two-year closure of the building. This week, with the deadline looming, the Trump-appointed board voted to fight the order. The judge refused to pause the order, writing that the public is rarely served by letting the government keep breaking the law.
• Appeals court rejects emergency stay of Trump name removal from Kennedy Center — An appeals court in Washington DC rejected an emergency appeal filed by Justice Department lawyers and Trump's hand-picked Kennedy Center board seeking to pause a federal judge's order to remove Trump's name from the Kennedy Center facade. US District Judge Christopher Cooper had ruled in May that Trump's name was illegally added to the iconic performing arts venue and ordered its removal within two weeks. Workers began removal efforts on June 12, 2026, despite the emergency appeal filed hours before the deadline.
• Federal judge orders removal of Trump's name from Kennedy Center facade; workers comply after emergency appeal denied — US District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled that Trump's name was illegally added to the Kennedy Center's facade and ordered its removal by Friday, June 13, 2026. Trump's board had renamed the venue in December 2026 after seizing control in February. After Trump's legal team filed emergency appeals on Friday afternoon, both were denied. Workers removed the signage early Saturday morning behind tarps. The judge found that only Congress, which designated the venue as a Kennedy memorial in 1964, could authorize a name change.
• Federal judge permits UFC event at White House despite legal challenge — Attorneys from the Public Integrity Project filed a lawsuit to block a UFC fight scheduled for the White House lawn on Trump's 80th birthday (billed as a 250th anniversary celebration). On Friday, a federal judge ruled the event could proceed. The lawsuit challenged the appropriateness and use of taxpayer funds for the mixed martial arts event, which Dana White said was Trump's idea. Marjorie Taylor Greene criticized the venue but expressed hope the event would be successful.
• Kennedy Center removes Trump signage following court order — Charles M. Floca, Trump-appointed head of the Kennedy Center, certified compliance with a court order requiring removal of all signage renaming the center after Trump. The center removed physical signs from the building and grounds, updated its website, removed Trump references from letterhead and promotional materials, and withdrew trademark applications. Workers installed scaffolding and tarps overnight to conceal the portico wall where Trump's name had been placed, with removal work occurring after 3:00 AM. The facade remained covered throughout the day while the center evaluated further legal options.
• Representative Beatty sued to block Kennedy Center renaming — Representative Joyce Beatty (D-OH), who as an ex officio member of the Kennedy Center board had been sidelined, filed suit to stop the renaming. She won the case, and Judge Cooper ordered Trump's name removed from the building, all signage, stationery, merchandise, and related materials before midnight on June 12, 2026.

Supporting reports

• Kennedy Center board filed emergency appeal to D.C. Circuit Court — Late on June 12, 2026, the Kennedy Center board filed an emergency appeal to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, requesting a stay of Judge Cooper's order to remove Trump's name from the building. In the filing, the board alleged for the first time that amended bylaws required the board to strip all funding from the Kennedy Center unless Trump's name remained on it, effectively threatening to defund the institution to prevent compliance with the court order.
• Kennedy Center board amended bylaws to block name removal and trigger financial penalty — The Kennedy Center board of directors amended its bylaws to declare that removal of Trump's name would trigger a requirement to return all donations received since Trump took control of the institution, potentially causing bankruptcy. Legal experts characterized this as a textbook violation of fiduciary duty designed to take the board "hostage" and prevent compliance with the court order.

Supporting reports

• D.C. Circuit Court denied Trump's emergency motion to stay Kennedy Center removal — Late on June 12, 2026, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Trump's emergency motion requesting a stay of Judge Cooper's order to remove Trump's name from the Kennedy Center. Despite the court's denial, the removal of signage took longer than anticipated due to the extensive scaffolding and labor required. The Department of Justice requested twelve additional hours to comply with the court order, stating the letters would come down "in the early hours of the morning of June 13," presumably to avoid the large audience watching the removal in person and on livestream.
• Judge Cooper denied DOJ stay request on Kennedy Center removal order — Judge Cooper rejected the Justice Department's request for a stay on his removal order, ruling that the government had not demonstrated it would prevail on the merits of its appeal. Cooper stated that staying the order "would not be in the public interest, which is rarely served by the 'perpetuation' of 'unlawful' governmental action."
• Justice Department filed notice of appeal of Kennedy Center removal order — Hours after the Kennedy Center board voted to launch a last-minute appeal to Judge Cooper's removal order, lawyers from the Justice Department filed a notice of appeal. They requested a stay on the judge's order, arguing that the board would be "forced to squander time and money" if the appeals court ruled in its favor and that it "would be incredibly confusing for the public" if Trump's name went back up after removal.
• Federal judge ordered Trump's name removed from Kennedy Center — A federal judge gave Trump 14 days to remove his name from the Kennedy Center. The deadline hit at midnight on June 12, 2026. Trump's legal team filed a last-minute stay request, arguing the removal would be "wasteful" and "confusing to the public," and escalated to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals seeking an emergency reprieve. Plaintiffs, including board member Joyce Beatty, responded that there is no real injury if the name is later restored, and documented real harm from the renaming: artists canceled performances, ticket sales dropped precipitously, and viewership of the Kennedy Center Honors broadcast fell. A judge upheld the ruling, and the Trump name was expected to come off the Kennedy Center around 6 p.m. ET on June 12.
• Judge denied Trump's emergency motion to reverse Kennedy Center name removal ruling — A federal judge in Washington, D.C. denied Trump's last-minute emergency petition seeking to reverse an earlier court order requiring removal of his name from the Kennedy Center. A work crew was deployed at the court-mandated deadline to remove the name, but work was halted due to rain. Trump subsequently filed an emergency stay petition with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, claiming the Kennedy Center board would face bankruptcy if forced to return donations received during his tenure.
• Trump's name removed from Kennedy Center facade — Workers removed the lettering referencing President Donald Trump from the facade of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on June 12, 2026, following the federal judge's order. The removal occurred around 6 p.m. ET after the midnight deadline passed.
• Department of Justice requested extension to comply with Kennedy Center removal order — The Department of Justice requested twelve additional hours from the court to comply with Judge Cooper's order to remove Trump's name from the Kennedy Center, stating that the letters would be removed "in the early hours of the morning of June 13." The request came after the government missed the midnight June 12 deadline, with the DOJ implicitly acknowledging that the removal would occur when there would not be a large audience watching either in person or on livestream.

Supporting reports

• Lawsuit filed to halt UFC event at White House, citing corruption and regulatory violations — Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit seeking to prevent the UFC event from proceeding on the White House South Lawn, arguing it violates regulations and represents corruption. The suit contends that the event is a for-profit endeavor from which the President and allies stand to profit, distinguishing it from precedent White House events. Plaintiffs also challenged the Trump administration's June 9 representation that the UFC would not film inside the Lincoln Memorial, noting that the National Park Service appeared to be taking instruction from the UFC and planned to close public access to the Memorial and allow filming inside it.
• Judge Amit Mehta ruled UFC event at White House could proceed despite legal challenge — Federal Judge Amit Mehta ruled that a UFC event scheduled to take place at the White House could proceed, finding that harm to plaintiffs challenging the event would be only "temporary" and that the legal challenge came too late. The judge cited the considerable time, labor, and funding already invested in organizing the event and its lead-up activities.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Douglas v. National Park Service (D.D.C.) 1:26-cv-02016 — Judge Mehta denied Plaintiffs' emergency application for a temporary restraining order or expedited preliminary injunction to block United Fighting Championship (UFC) Freedom 250 events at the White House South Lawn and Lincoln Memorial, concluding that Plaintiffs failed to establish a substantial likelihood of standing, irreparable harm, or a favorable balance of equities. On standing, the court held that neither Plaintiff demonstrated a concrete, direct aesthetic injury - Romano's presence near the affected areas was speculative, and Douglas' planned visits were primarily for protest activity rather than enjoyment of the sites' aesthetic or historical character. The court also found that Plaintiffs' unreasonable delay in filing (the event had been publicized since July 2025), the ancillary nature of their claimed harms, and the temporary character of the event structures independently precluded a showing of irreparable harm. Judge Mehta also highlighted the significant potential losses that would be borne by event organizers and damage to the reliance interests of prospective attendees in the event of an emergency injunction.

Supporting reports

• US District Judge Orders Kennedy Center to Remove Trump's Name from Website — US District Judge Christopher Cooper issued an order requiring the Kennedy Center to remove all references to "Trump Kennedy Center" from its website and materials. The Kennedy Center complied by removing Trump's name from its website on Monday, June 8, ahead of a June 12 deadline set by the center's general counsel. Cooper's 94-page ruling stated that only Congress can change the Kennedy Center's official name, which is statutorily designated for President Kennedy. The judge also temporarily blocked a proposed $257 million renovation project that would have closed the venue for two years.

Supporting reports

• Public Integrity Project files lawsuit to block UFC event at White House — The watchdog group Public Integrity Project filed a federal lawsuit in DC District Court on Saturday, seeking an emergency injunction to halt the UFC Freedom 250 event scheduled for June 14 at the White House. The complaint names the National Park Service and Department of the Interior as defendants, arguing the Trump administration violated multiple federal laws by using a temporary rule meant for government-planned bicentennial events to accommodate what it characterizes as a private, for-profit sporting event. The suit also alleges the 92-foot steel structure erected on the South Lawn lacked required congressional authorization and environmental review, and notes Trump holds up to $50,000 in stock in the UFC's parent company.
• Federal lawsuit filed to stop UFC cage fights at White House — Susan Douglas and Paul Romano, represented by the Public Integrity Project, filed a federal lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to stop Ultimate Fighting Championship cage fights scheduled for the White House on Trump's 80th birthday, one week from the article date. The lawsuit alleges that UFC chief executive Dana White, a close friend and ally of the president, is receiving unprecedented access to the White House and Lincoln Memorial to stage a private, for-profit sports event. Trump purchased between $15,000 and $50,000 of stock in TKO Holding Group, UFC's parent company. The lawsuit notes that federal law tightly restricts private use of national capital monuments and that the event is being tied to Trump's birthday rather than the nation's 250th anniversary.
• Federal lawsuit filed to halt UFC event at White House — A Virginia political organizer and military veteran filed a federal lawsuit seeking a court order to halt a UFC fight scheduled at the White House. The lawsuit alleges the event violates federal law restricting private use of national parklands, that the UFC is erecting a 92-foot-tall, 600-ton steel structure called "the Claw" adjacent to the Executive Residence and destroying much of the South Lawn, and that Trump suggested the structure may never be removed. The lawsuit characterizes the event as a private, for-profit venture using the nation's most sacred spaces.

Supporting reports

• House Republicans blocked Trump's $1 billion White House ballroom security project — GOP lawmakers are bucking Trump by shelving plans to spend $1 billion to secure a new White House ballroom facility and other areas of the presidential compound. The "Trump battleships" proposal is facing skepticism at the House Armed Services Committee as lawmakers prepare to mark up the FY2027 defense authorization bill.
• Senate Republicans remove $1bn White House ballroom security funding from reconciliation bill — Senate Republicans formally dropped a $1 billion allocation for security improvements at Donald Trump's proposed White House ballroom from the Secure America Act reconciliation bill on Wednesday. The funding had been included in broader legislation authorizing $70 billion for immigration enforcement agencies through Trump's term. The Senate parliamentarian determined the ballroom money violated budget reconciliation rules, and Democratic opposition threatened to complicate passage. Republicans removed the provision and advanced the revised bill on a 53-46 party-line vote, preserving the $70 billion immigration enforcement funding.

Supporting reports

• Judge orders removal of Trump's name from Kennedy Center; blocks summer closure — US District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled that the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts cannot be renamed without an act of Congress, ordering the Trump administration to remove all signage bearing Trump's name within 14 days. Cooper also temporarily blocked the center's proposed two-year closure for renovations, finding the board's decision "ill-informed and seemingly preordained." Trump responded by instructing the Department of Commerce to arrange a full transfer of the institution to Congress.
• Federal judge orders Trump's name removed from Kennedy Center — A federal judge blocked Trump's effort to shut down the Kennedy Center and ordered his name removed from the building. Trump responded with a multi-thousand-word statement on Truth Social blaming the judge, the judge's wife, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Lisa Page, Russia investigations, E. Jean Carroll, tariffs, birthright citizenship, and the broader court system. Trump declared the Kennedy Center will "probably never open again" and stated he wants to relinquish control of the center entirely.
• Trump posted social media screed attacking Kennedy Center ruling — President Trump responded to Judge Cooper's order to remove his name from the Kennedy Center with a lengthy social media post in which he claimed he alone was "saving a dying Performing Arts Center" and stated he would "transfer this failing Institution back to" Congress. Trump also complained that the New York Times was criticizing the "magnificent restoration of the Reflecting Pool" and asserted that no president had been treated as unfairly by the courts as he had been.
• Trump threatened federal judge over Kennedy Center drone port project — Trump attacked a federal judge who blocked his planned Kennedy Center renovations, which included a drone port to be built in the White House ballroom. The President's threats against the judge occurred as he simultaneously expressed desire to cancel the "Freedom 250" anniversary celebration and replace it with a MAGA rally after several artists declined to participate.
• Kennedy Center begins removing president's name from signage and materials — The Kennedy Center's general counsel directed staff to remove the president's name from signage, letterhead, and materials by June 12, after U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled on May 29 that the board lacked authority to rename the institution and also blocked its planned two-year closure. The center said it is evaluating its legal options. The ruling restored the principle that public institutions are governed by rules that do not bend to a single person.
• Trump's name removed from Kennedy Center — Lawyers for the Trump Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts instructed staff to immediately begin switching the facility's name back to its original title, the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. The instructions, laid out in a memo sent by the center's general counsel, represent the first official signal that the national arts hub is complying with a federal court order to drop Trump's name and reconsider plans to close for two years of renovations. Changes to interior and exterior signage and furniture carrying Trump's name must be switched back by the following Friday.

Supporting reports

• Bipartisan group of ex-federal judges files lawsuit challenging Trump's $1.8bn anti-weaponization fund — Thirty-five former federal judges, including conservative J. Michael Luttig and former district judges Nancy Gertner and Shira Scheindlin, filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on May 29 seeking to reopen Trump's IRS case. They argue the $1.776bn settlement fund is "a product of collusion and a fraud on the Court," claiming Judge Kathleen Williams may have been deceived before approving it on May 18. The judges contend the fund was created to distribute taxpayer dollars to Trump's political allies, including those convicted in the January 6 Capitol riot.
• Thirty-five federal judges requested Trump lawsuit reopening — Thirty-five federal judges filed a request that U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams reopen a legal case that Trump, his oldest sons, and the Trump Organization had brought against the Internal Revenue Service. Although the Trumps had dropped the suit, the Department of Justice used it as justification for establishing the $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund to compensate those claiming the legal system had been "weaponized" against them for crimes related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The judges' filing challenges the legitimacy of the fund by questioning whether the Trumps and the IRS were actually adversaries in the case.
• Thirty-five former federal judges challenge Trump IRS settlement as fraud on the court — A group of thirty-five former federal judges, appointed by members of both political parties, filed a motion asking U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams to reopen the legal case Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization brought against the Internal Revenue Service. The judges alleged that Trump and his organization dropped the lawsuit and announced a "settlement agreement" with the Department of Justice as a pretext to justify a $1.776 billion slush fund for paying off those convicted in connection with Trump's schemes to overturn the 2020 election results. The judges characterized the lawsuit and settlement as "fraud on the Court," noting that Trump was simultaneously the plaintiff and the person in charge of the IRS, and that the settlement lacked constitutional or congressional authority.
• Florida court ordered Trump to respond to retired federal judges' filing on slush fund — A federal court in Florida ordered President Trump to respond to a filing by 35 retired federal judges who are requesting an investigation into the Anti-Weaponization Fund and the dismissal of Trump's lawsuit against the IRS. The retired judges' filing alleges possible "collusion" in the case. This represents an early procedural victory for the judges in their challenge to the fund.