Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• DOJ sends letters to 30 election officials ordering retention of 2024 records and indicating investigation — Trump's Justice Department sent letters to at least 30 senior state election officials ordering retention of all 2024 election-related records, despite state laws permitting destruction of voting records 22 months after an election. The letters indicated that chief election officials "are currently under investigation" and subject to "ongoing litigation," though the nature, scope, and whether the probe is criminal or civil remain unclear. The action appears designed to create legal jeopardy for election administrators.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration considers settling $10bn IRS lawsuit with $1.7bn compensation fund for allies including January 6 rioters — The Trump administration is reportedly negotiating to settle Trump's $10bn lawsuit against the IRS by establishing a $1.7bn compensation fund using the Treasury Department's Judgment Fund. The fund would compensate individuals Trump claims were wrongfully targeted by the Biden administration, including over 1,500 January 6 rioters. The settlement would also include a public IRS apology and waiver of audits on Trump, his family, and businesses. A federal judge has appointed attorneys to examine whether a genuine legal controversy exists, raising concerns about self-dealing and potential DOJ manipulation.
• Trump withdrew IRS lawsuit; DOJ established $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" from Judgment Fund — Attorneys for President Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization filed notice voluntarily dismissing a $10 billion IRS lawsuit in federal court in Miami with prejudice. In exchange, the Justice Department announced creation of a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" drawn from the federal Judgment Fund to issue apologies and monetary relief to people claiming government "weaponization" or "lawfare." A five-member commission appointed by the Attorney General will decide beneficiaries; the President can remove any member. Quarterly reports go to the Attorney General, not the public. The fund must cease processing claims by December 2028.
• Trump settles IRS lawsuit and establishes $1.8bn anti-weaponization fund — Trump settled his lawsuit against the IRS over the leaking of his tax information by a whistleblower, abandoning his $10bn damages claim in exchange for a financial agreement that allowed him to establish a $1.776bn "anti-weaponization fund." Federal Judge Kathleen Williams approved the settlement on May 18. Critics and Democrats argue the fund functions as a "slush fund" designed to distribute taxpayer dollars to Trump's political allies, including those convicted of violence during the January 6 Capitol riot, whom Trump subsequently pardoned.
• Justice Department announces Anti-Weaponization Fund settlement with Trump entities — The Department of Justice announced establishment of "The Anti-Weaponization Fund" as part of a settlement agreement in President Donald J. Trump v. Internal Revenue Service. The fund, capitalized at $1.776 billion from the judgment fund, will process claims from individuals alleging weaponization or lawfare by government. Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization agreed to drop their lawsuit with prejudice and withdraw administrative claims related to tax-return leaks, the Mar-a-Lago raid, and Russia-collusion investigations in exchange for a formal apology (but no monetary damages to them personally) and creation of the fund. The fund will cease operations by December 1, 2028.
• DOJ establishes $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" for January 6 defendants and MAGA loyalists — The Department of Justice created a $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded "Anti-Weaponization Fund" designated to provide financial support to January 6th insurrectionists and MAGA loyalists. The fund represents a direct allocation of federal resources to individuals convicted or charged in connection with the Capitol attack, effectively using public money to benefit political allies and those involved in the assault on the Capitol.
• DOJ establishes $1.776 billion fund for January 6 defendants and Trump allies — The Department of Justice, under Attorney General Todd Blanche, announced the creation of a $1.776 billion fund designated "for victims of lawfare and weaponization" to provide monetary relief and formal apologies to claimants. The fund will be administered by a five-member Commission appointed by the Attorney General, with one member chosen in consultation with congressional leadership. The President retains authority to remove any Commission member. The fund is expected to provide payouts to individuals convicted or charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol breach and Trump administration officials.
• DOJ announced Anti-Weaponization Fund eligibility may include January 6 defendants — ABC News and TIME reported before the fund announcement that the proposed $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund could include people charged in connection with January 6. Reuters notes that "weaponization" and "lawfare" are terms the President and allies have used to describe criminal cases arising from the Capitol attack. The Hill reports that several convicted January 6 defendants have pending civil suits. DOJ has not publicly released eligibility criteria or named beneficiaries.
• DOJ announces $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" as Trump settlement — Trump's Justice Department officially announced the $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" as part of a settlement with Trump in his lawsuit against the Treasury Department and IRS over the leaking of his tax returns. The fund will be overseen by a commission appointed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, whose members Trump can fire without cause, and will be made available in secret to those claiming wrongful government targeting, potentially including those Trump pardoned for January 6 involvement.
• Trump administration dismisses $10bn IRS lawsuit and establishes $1.776bn secretive compensation fund — The Justice Department announced creation of a $1.776bn "Anti-Weaponization Fund" as part of an agreement in which Trump and his sons dropped a $10bn lawsuit against the IRS. The fund, overseen by five commissioners (four appointed by the attorney general and removable by Trump), will compensate Trump allies with minimal transparency—quarterly reports go only to the attorney general and are confidential. Trump and his sons receive formal apologies but no monetary compensation. Democrats and watchdog groups condemned the arrangement as a slush fund funneling taxpayer dollars to political allies.
• Department of Justice announces $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" to compensate Trump and associates — The Department of Justice, under Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, announced the creation of a $1.776 billion fund purportedly to compensate victims of alleged "weaponization" of the Justice Department under former President Biden. The fund was established following Trump's withdrawal of a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS after a contractor leaked his tax information. Judge Kathleen Williams dismissed the suit, noting no legal settlement existed. The fund is controlled by five administrators, four chosen by Blanche and one in consultation with Congress, all removable by Trump without cause. Distributions are confidential and overseen only by the DOJ. Remaining funds after December 2028 revert to Trump's chosen federal account.
• Creation of $1.776 billion compensation fund for Trump allies with minimal oversight — The Department of Justice announced creation of a $1.776 billion compensation fund on May 19–20, 2026, to settle Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS and other government claims. The fund is administered by five officials subject to at-will removal by the president, operates with minimal transparency requirements, and is not obligated to publicly disclose recipients or justifications for awards. Senate Democrats criticized the arrangement as an "outrageous, unprecedented slush fund." Acting attorney general Blanche testified that no limitations exist on who may seek compensation, including those convicted of assaulting police on January 6, though he stated Trump and his sons would not receive direct compensation.
• DOJ announces creation of Anti-Weaponization Fund — The Department of Justice announced the establishment of a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" aimed at compensating individuals it describes as victims of lawfare under former President Joe Biden. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the fund is a lawful process for victims to seek redress. However, the fund is not a legal settlement related to Trump's dropped lawsuit against the IRS, and it grants Trump significant control over the distribution of taxpayer money without oversight.
• Justice Department announced $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund from Trump IRS lawsuit settlement — The Justice Department announced a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" created as part of a settlement of President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns. Trump, his two adult sons, and the Trump Organization dropped the suit and received a formal apology but no direct monetary payment. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal defense attorney, established the fund and will handpick the five-member commission deciding eligibility and payouts. The process is largely shielded from court review, and eligibility criteria remain undefined, with Blanche stating "anybody can apply."

Supporting reports

• Colorado governor commutes election denier Tina Peters' sentence under White House pressure — Colorado Governor Jared Polis commuted the prison sentence of Tina Peters, a former Mesa County election clerk convicted in 2024 of three felonies related to unauthorized access to voting equipment in 2020. Peters' original nine-year sentence was reduced to four and a half years, with release scheduled for June 1, 2026. The commutation followed months of pressure from Donald Trump and conservative allies, including Trump's issuance of a federal pardon (which had no legal effect on her state conviction) and threats to withhold federal funds from Colorado.
• Colorado governor commutes sentence of election denier Tina Peters — Colorado Governor Jared Polis commuted the nearly nine-year prison sentence of Tina Peters, a former Mesa County clerk convicted in 2024 of four felonies and three misdemeanors for allowing unauthorized access to county voting systems in 2021. Peters, who allowed pro-surfer Conan Hayes (affiliated with Mike Lindell) to access and copy voting equipment, will be released on parole June 1 after her sentence was reduced from eight and a half years to approximately four and a half years. The commutation drew sharp criticism from Colorado's Secretary of State Jena Griswold and election officials nationwide, who warned it signals tolerance for election tampering.

Supporting reports

• Trump negotiates $1.7 billion fund to compensate allies for alleged DOJ weaponization — Trump is in talks to drop his $10 billion IRS lawsuit in exchange for the government establishing a $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded account to compensate Trump's allies who claim they were harmed by the Biden administration's alleged weaponization of the Department of Justice. Eligible recipients would include nearly 1,600 people convicted of crimes related to the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack, whom Trump pardoned or commuted shortly after taking office in January 2025. While Trump himself will likely be barred from direct payments, entities associated with him will not be.
• Trump DOJ creates $1.7 billion compensation fund for January 6 defendants and Trump allies — The Trump administration is expected to settle Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS by creating a $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded compensation fund to pay individuals and entities claiming wrongful targeting by the Biden administration. The fund would compensate approximately 1,600 January 6 Capitol attack defendants and potentially Trump-associated entities. Trump would retain authority to remove commission members without cause, and the commission would operate with minimal disclosure requirements or oversight of its decision-making process for distributing over $1 billion in public funds.
• Trump administration considers $1.7 billion compensation fund for allies investigated under Biden — The Trump administration is reportedly considering a $1.7 billion fund to compensate President Trump's allies and others who claim they were harmed by Justice Department investigations during the Biden administration. The fund could cover legal costs for people in Trump's orbit and potentially extend to some of the nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack. The administration has discussed modeling the program on past federal settlement funds, with possible payments through the Treasury Department's Judgment Fund. The proposal has not been finalized or approved.
• White House and DOJ explore settlement of Trump's $10 billion IRS lawsuit — The New York Times reported that the White House and Justice Department are exploring a settlement in Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS for releasing his tax returns. ABC News reported that Trump is expected to settle in exchange for launching a $1.7 billion compensation fund for his allies, including those pardoned for Jan. 6 involvement, with a Trump-controlled commission overseeing distribution and recipient identities potentially kept private. The settlement would use taxpayer funds to reward political allies.

Supporting reports

• DOJ files motions to vacate January 6 seditious conspiracy convictions — The US Department of Justice, under Trump-appointed US Attorney Jeanine Pirro, filed motions on April 15, 2026, to overturn seditious conspiracy convictions of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers members convicted for their roles in the January 6, 2021 Capitol siege. The filing targets convictions of leaders including Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, and Stewart Rhodes. This action follows Trump's January 2025 mass pardons and commutations of roughly 1,600 Capitol-related defendants, including Enrique Tarrio, who had been sentenced to 22 years. The filing would erase convictions from defendants' records.
• Department of Justice moved to dismiss seditious conspiracy convictions of January 6 defendants — The Department of Justice filed a motion to vacate the seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys members convicted for their roles in the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Lenerz wrote that "The United States has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice." This action follows Trump's January 2025 pardons and sentence commutations of January 6 participants, effectively erasing accountability for convictions related to the attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
• DOJ seeks to dismiss Oath Keepers and Proud Boys Jan. 6 convictions — Trump's Justice Department filed a motion with a federal appeals court to dismiss seditious conspiracy convictions of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys members charged for their roles in the January 6 insurrection. The defendants had previously received sentence commutations on Trump's first day in office but were not among the 1,200+ individuals pardoned for January 6-related crimes.

Supporting reports

• Trump posted demands to imprison political opponents over 2020 election — Trump posted demands that political opponents be imprisoned over the 2020 election, shared fabricated electoral maps to claim a victory that did not occur, amplified calls to prosecute investigators like Jack Smith, and circulated communications suggesting federal regulators should pressure private companies like Apple to alter its News app in ways favorable to him.

Supporting reports

• Seizure of 2020 Ballots in Georgia — Ballots from the 2020 election in Georgia were seized, raising concerns about election integrity and the potential for undermining public trust in electoral processes. The seizure has been linked to ongoing disputes and investigations related to the 2020 election results. This action has prompted criticism from civil rights groups and calls for transparency in the handling of election materials.
• FBI executes search warrant on Fulton County Georgia elections facility — In early 2026, the FBI executed a search warrant on an elections facility in Fulton County, Georgia, and seized approximately 700 boxes of 2020 election records, including original ballots. Trump appeared to have advance knowledge of the raid and directed then-Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to participate. After the raid, Trump personally thanked some of the agents involved. The raid was allegedly part of a criminal investigation into record retention violations but relied largely on debunked conspiracy theories.
• FBI raids Fulton County elections office and seizes 2020 election documents — FBI agents executed a criminal warrant at Fulton County's elections offices, seizing approximately 700 boxes of 2020 election documents. The raid was authorized by U.S. Attorney Thomas Albus (St. Louis-based), designated by the Trump administration as its point person on election integrity cases. Fulton County Commission Chair Robb Pitts reported receiving a warning call two days prior that he and other Georgia officials faced imminent arrest. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's presence at the raid raised questions about political interference and national security involvement.
• FBI Raids Election Office in Fulton County, Georgia — FBI agents executed a raid on an election office in Fulton County, Georgia, seizing 700 boxes of ballots and other election-related materials from the 2020 election. The warrant for the raid was issued by U.S. Attorney Thomas Albus, who was appointed by Trump and given special authority to operate across the nation. The involvement of the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, during the raid raised concerns about the politicization of law enforcement.

Supporting reports

• FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County elections office, seizes ballots and voter data — FBI agents executed a criminal search warrant at the Fulton County elections office in Union City, Georgia, on January 28, 2026, seizing approximately 700 boxes of election materials including all ballots, tabulator tapes, electronic ballot images, and voter rolls. The raid was conducted at the behest of the Trump administration as part of efforts to relitigate the 2020 presidential election. Election integrity experts have confirmed the 2020 election was the most secure to date, and dozens of legal challenges to Trump's defeat have failed.
• FBI raid on Fulton County election office based on debunked election-denial claims — On 28 January 2026, the FBI raided the Fulton County election office in Georgia, seizing nearly 700 boxes of election materials. The search warrant affidavit, unsealed on 11 February, reveals the raid's rationale was based on debunked claims from election deniers and originated from a referral by Kurt Olsen, a White House lawyer who previously sought to overturn the 2020 election. Witnesses included conservative activists and Trump-aligned Georgia state election board members. Claims cited in the affidavit—regarding ballot image discrepancies, tabulator tape handling, and "pristine" ballots—had been previously investigated and debunked by state officials.
• FBI seized 2020 election records from Fulton County in January raid — On January 28, 2026, FBI agents executed a criminal search warrant at Fulton County's election offices in Georgia, seizing approximately 700 boxes of 2020 election documents. In a federal court hearing on March 27, Fulton County's lawyers argued the FBI's affidavit contained misrepresentations and relied on debunked claims from witnesses, some of whom had been sanctioned for lying or convicted of other crimes. The county contends the seizure was part of the Trump administration's campaign to delegitimize the 2020 election results and that the statute of limitations for any alleged crimes has expired.
• Trump directs national intelligence investigation into voting machines — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard launched an investigation into voting machines at Trump's direction. Simultaneously, the FBI conducted an unprecedented search of the Fulton County, Georgia election office in late January 2026, seizing ballots related to the 2020 election. The basis for the raid relied on recycled and debunked claims about the 2020 election. These actions are part of a broader administration effort to undermine confidence in election integrity ahead of November 2026 midterms.
• Tulsi Gabbard present at FBI search warrant execution at Fulton County elections office — On January 28, FBI agents executed a search warrant at the Fulton County elections hub in Union City, Georgia, seeking 2020 election records including ballots, tabulator tapes, ballot images, and voter rolls. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, was present at the scene. An unnamed administration official cited election security and foreign interference concerns; Gabbard has not publicly explained her presence. Democratic lawmakers questioned whether her attendance violated protocols or represented a politicization of the intelligence community.
• FBI agents raided Fulton County, Georgia election office and seized 2020 election materials — FBI agents, operating under a warrant issued by U.S. Attorney Thomas Albus (appointed by Trump to the Eastern District of Missouri), raided an election office in Fulton County, Georgia and removed 700 boxes of ballots, tabulation tapes, and other election-related materials from the 2020 election. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was present at the raid, met with some of the FBI agents, and connected Trump to the agents by phone, allowing Trump to speak directly to them during the operation.
• FBI raided Fulton County election office under Trump administration direction — On January 28, 2026, FBI agents executed a warrant to seize records from the Fulton County, Georgia election office related to the 2020 election. The warrant authorized seizure of physical ballots, voting machine tabulator tapes, voter rolls, and electronic data. Trump administration officials claimed the materials constituted evidence of crime. Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's Director of National Intelligence, was on site despite the DNI having no domestic law enforcement role and being tasked with foreign intelligence.
• FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County election office for 2020 election records — The FBI executed a search warrant at the Fulton County, Georgia election office on January 29, 2026, seeking ballots, tabulator tapes, ballot images, and voter rolls from the 2020 election. County Commissioner Mo Ivory stated the initial warrant was "legally incorrect" and was challenged by county officials before the FBI obtained a corrected version. Democratic officials expressed concern that chain of custody protections were inadequate, fearing the Trump Administration could modify seized materials. The warrant was issued by interim U.S. Attorney Thomas Albus (Eastern District of Missouri) and suggests alleged criminal conduct involved retaining records and tabulating false ballots.
• FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County election office, seizing 2020 ballots and records — FBI agents executed a search warrant at the Fulton County, Georgia election office on Wednesday afternoon, seizing all 2020 election ballots, tabulator tapes, ballot images, and voter rolls. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was present during the raid. The action follows the Trump administration's nationwide push to obtain voter rolls and investigate alleged election fraud, despite courts dismissing three of nearly two dozen related DOJ lawsuits. Election officials and experts contend the raid has little legal basis and serves to undermine public confidence in election integrity ahead of the 2026 midterms.
• FBI executes search warrant at Fulton County elections warehouse — The Federal Bureau of Investigation executed a search warrant at the elections warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize ballots from the 2020 presidential election, including all tabulator tapes and ballot images from the original ballot count. The seizure also included all voter rolls from Fulton County. The action breaks the chain of custody and contaminates the files. This action occurs as President Trump continues to assert that the 2020 election was stolen despite zero evidence, five years of debunked claims, and dismissal of dozens of court cases.
• FBI seizes 2020 election ballots from Fulton County, Georgia warehouse — The FBI executed a search warrant at the elections warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize ballots from the 2020 presidential election. This action is part of ongoing efforts by Trump and his allies to promote unfounded claims of voter fraud despite a lack of evidence.
• Georgia State Board of Elections subpoenas 2020 election records from Fulton County — The Federal Bureau of Investigation seized ballots from the 2020 presidential election stored in a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia. The seizure occurred as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has been reassigned to investigate Trump's claims that the 2020 election was stolen, focusing on allegations of foreign government involvement.
• FBI raids Fulton County election office for 2020 materials — The Georgia State Board of Elections, which has a Trump-aligned majority, issued a subpoena for 2020 election records from Fulton County at the urging of Trump and election denialists. Fulton County initially sought to quash the subpoena in court. In December, a Fulton County superior court judge ruled in the state board's favor, ordering the county to turn over records. County officials estimated the cost of producing the documents at $376,800 and had scheduled a February 9 meeting to discuss the transfer process before the FBI raid occurred.
• DHS warns of prosecution for doxing ICE agents — FBI agents conducted a raid on the Fulton County election office to seize materials related to the 2020 presidential election. The action is characterized as part of the Trump Administration's broader effort to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election results and to support claims of election fraud.
• FBI Atlanta field office chief removed after questioning DOJ's 2020 election investigation — The Department of Homeland Security, through Secretary Kristi Noem, issued a public warning that it would prosecute individuals who identify ICE agents online to "the fullest extent of the law." The statement characterized those engaged in identifying agents as criminals "taking the side of vicious cartels and human traffickers." The warning was issued in response to antifa groups in Portland identifying ICE officers.
• Trump administration pursues nationwide voter roll seizures via DOJ lawsuits — Paul W Brown, special agent in charge of the FBI's Atlanta field office, was reportedly removed from his post after expressing concerns about unsubstantiated voter fraud allegations in Fulton County, Georgia, and refusing to carry out searches and seizures of election records. The removal occurred one week before the DOJ executed a search warrant seizing 700 boxes of 2020 election records from the county elections office. National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard was present during the raid, prompting Democratic concern about partisan overreach.
• Attorney General Bondi linked voter roll demands to immigration enforcement — The Trump administration has launched a nationwide effort to obtain voter rolls containing sensitive information from nearly every U.S. state, including Georgia, through Department of Justice lawsuits. Experts report little legal basis for the move; three of nearly two dozen DOJ lawsuits have already been dismissed by courts. Election security experts characterize the effort as designed to fuel false claims of fraud and weaken confidence in election results, particularly ahead of the 2026 and 2028 election cycles.
• Tulsi Gabbard, DNI, appears at Fulton County election raid — Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter this week to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz linking the Department of Justice's voter roll data demands to the administration's immigration enforcement operations in the state. The letter connected federal voter registration record requests to recent immigration raids, a linkage that had already been cited in one active DOJ voter roll lawsuit.
• — Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, was spotted on site at the Fulton County election office during the FBI raid on Wednesday evening. Her presence prompted widespread outrage and questions about why an intelligence official was involved in a domestic election matter. The Wall Street Journal reported that Gabbard is leading the Trump administration's effort to investigate voter fraud nationwide, raising concerns about the politicization of the intelligence community.

Supporting reports

• Trump threatened prosecution of DOJ officials over 2020 election claims — At the Davos speech, Trump stated that "People will soon be prosecuted for what they did" regarding the 2020 presidential election, which he falsely claimed was rigged. He asserted that DOJ officials and others would face prosecution for refusing to help him overturn the election results. The threat was made one day before former special counsel Jack Smith was scheduled to testify publicly about evidence leading to Trump's indictment for efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
• President Trump threatens prosecution of DOJ officials — During a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, President Trump claimed that the 2020 U.S. presidential election was rigged and threatened to prosecute Department of Justice officials who did not assist him in overturning the election results. This statement came as former special counsel Jack Smith was set to testify about evidence related to Trump's actions following the election. Trump's remarks indicate a continued effort to undermine the legitimacy of the election and discredit those who oppose him.
• Trump threatened Jack Smith and demanded investigation — After Jack Smith testified before the House Judiciary Committee, Trump's social media account posted a threatening message calling Smith a "deranged animal" who "shouldn't be allowed to practice Law" and stating that if Smith were a Republican, "his license would be taken away from him, and far worse." Trump demanded that the Attorney General investigate Smith's conduct, including his use of witnesses, and characterized the entire investigation as a "Democrat SCAM."
• Trump calls for prosecution of Jack Smith on Truth Social — On Truth Social, President Trump responded to Jack Smith's congressional testimony by calling for Smith to "be prosecuted for his actions" and arguing that "At a minimum, he committed large scale perjury!"
• Jack Smith testifies he expects Trump administration to indict him — During his public testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, former special counsel Jack Smith stated that he believes Trump administration officials will "do everything in their power" to indict him "because they've been ordered to by the president," but added that he "will not be intimidated." Smith also expressed concern about Trump's mass pardons of people who assaulted police officers.

Supporting reports

• House Judiciary Committee expands investigation into Jack Smith — CNN reported that the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee is expanding its investigation into former Special Counsel Jack Smith by demanding interviews with four current and former Justice Department officials involved in subpoenaing phone records for several members of Congress around the January 6 insurrection.
• Jack Smith testifies to House Judiciary Committee on federal prosecutions of Trump — Former special counsel Jack Smith testified in a closed-door deposition before the House Judiciary Committee on December 17, 2025, defending his federal cases against Donald Trump for classified-documents possession and election interference. Smith stated he had "proof beyond reasonable doubt" in both cases, denied any political motivation or interference from President Biden or Attorney General Merrick Garland, and warned that unpunished election meddling would become "the new norm" with "catastrophic" consequences for democracy. The testimony transcript was released on December 31, 2025.
• Jack Smith testified before House Judiciary Committee on Trump's 2020 election overturn scheme — Former special counsel Jack Smith testified behind closed doors before the House Judiciary Committee regarding his investigation into Trump's attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. According to Smith's opening statement obtained by NBC News, Smith stated he and his team found "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump engaged in a "criminal scheme" to overturn the election. Smith testified that phone records of nine congressional Republicans were "lawfully subpoenaed and were relevant to complete a comprehensive" investigation, and that Trump and his associates "tried to call Members of Congress in furtherance of their criminal scheme, urging them to further delay certification of the 2020 election." Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) had subpoenaed Smith and rejected his offer to testify publicly.
• Representative Ocasio-Cortez criticizes intelligence briefing as inadequate — Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) called the briefing "a joke," stating that no intelligence shared rose to the level of briefings on Ukraine or China, and characterized it as "a communication of an opinion" rather than a serious intelligence briefing.
• Senator Andy Kim states Trump's blockade contradicts military briefing — Senator Andy Kim (D-NJ) noted that Trump's threatened military action directly contradicts what Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth told Senate colleagues that day about the mission and goals of operations in the Caribbean. Kim called it a dangerous escalation and stated the administration must come before Congress for public hearings to explain why they are risking pulling the nation into another forever war.
• Senator Chris Murphy states administration lacks legal justification for strikes — After the briefing, Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) stated that the administration had no legal justification for the strikes and no national security justification. He noted that officers admitted the drugs transiting Venezuela were primarily cocaine headed for Europe, not fentanyl as the administration had suggested.
• Senator Schumer states administration came to briefing "empty handed" — Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said after the briefing that the administration came "empty handed" and questioned how senators could trust the administration's transparency on other Caribbean issues if they could not be transparent on the strikes. He stated that every senator was entitled to see the video.
• Special Counsel Jack Smith offered to testify publicly before Congress without time limits; Republicans declined and opted for closed-door deposition instead. — Special Counsel Jack Smith offered to testify publicly before Congress without time limits to answer questions about investigations into Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his retention of classified documents. Republicans declined the public testimony offer and instead opted for a closed-door deposition while continuing to attack Smith on partisan media outlets. Smith's opening statement established that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the election and obstruct the lawful transfer of power, and willfully retained highly classified documents in unsecured locations.
• Jack Smith tells House Judiciary Committee Trump engaged in criminal scheme — Former Special Counsel Jack Smith told lawmakers during a closed-door hearing before the House Judiciary Committee that his team "developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump "engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power." He also said he would prosecute a former president again "based on the same facts today," no matter which party the president belongs to.
• Jack Smith testified under oath about Trump's criminal conduct in 2020 election and classified documents — On December 17, 2025, former Special Counsel Jack Smith testified under oath in a closed-door hearing before the House Judiciary Committee. Smith stated that his office had "developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power" and had developed "powerful evidence" that Trump "willfully retained highly classified documents after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom," and "repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents."
• House Judiciary members announced legal action against DOJ over Epstein files — Ranking members Robert Garcia and Jamie Raskin issued a joint statement announcing they are examining all legal options to compel the DOJ to comply with the federal law requiring full release of Epstein documents. They stated that survivors deserve justice, co-conspirators must be held accountable, and the American people deserve complete transparency.
• Jack Smith requested public hearing before House Judiciary Committee — Attorneys for former Special Counsel Jack Smith requested a public hearing before the House Judiciary Committee to defend his prosecutorial decisions against Republican attacks. Smith had previously testified in a closed-door deposition spanning over 8 hours. His attorneys also requested release of the full videotape of his testimony so he could speak directly to the public rather than through second-hand accounts.
• Court Filing Claims Discrimination in Federal Grant Distribution — Lawyers for the government filed a court document asserting that it is legal to distribute federal funds only to Republican-led states, withholding them from Democratic-led states. This admission suggests a discriminatory policy based on political affiliation, which the government claims is constitutionally permissible.
• Jack Smith Testifies on Trump's Criminal Scheme to Overturn Election — Special counsel Jack Smith testified before the House Judiciary Committee, presenting evidence that Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Smith's testimony included details about phone records of congressional Republicans related to the investigation.

Supporting reports

• Trump signed pardons for 77 election subversion conspirators — Trump signed pardons for 77 individuals involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, and fake electors who had already pleaded guilty. The pardons were signed Friday and announced Sunday night during government shutdown media coverage. The timing and announcement strategy obscured the action from public attention during competing news cycles.
• Trump withdrew endorsement from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene over Epstein file support — President Trump withdrew his endorsement from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) on Friday, November 14, citing her support for releasing the Epstein investigation files. Greene stated the withdrawal was directly tied to her position on the transparency measure, representing a use of presidential political power to punish a member of Congress for supporting government disclosure.
• Trump withdrew endorsement of Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene — President Trump announced he was "withdrawing my support and Endorsement of 'Congresswoman' Marjorie Taylor Greene" and attacked Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY), calling him a "LOSER," in response to their votes in favor of releasing the Epstein files compiled by the FBI. Greene responded that Trump was "coming after me hard to make an example to scare all the other Republicans before next weeks vote to release the Epstein files," stating she would not "worship or serve Donald Trump."

Supporting reports

• Trump issued broad pardon for 2020 election-related conduct — Justice Department pardon attorney Ed Martin posted a document on social media revealing that Trump issued a sweeping pardon covering "all United States citizens for conduct relating to the advice, creation, organization, execution, submission, support, voting, activities, participation in, or advocacy for or of any slate or proposed slate of Presidential Electors" in connection with the 2020 election, as well as conduct related to efforts to expose alleged voting fraud and vulnerabilities.

Supporting reports

• Trump pardoned dozens of election-denying loyalists and fake electors — Trump pardoned dozens of election-denying loyalists and fake electors involved in plans to overturn the 2020 presidential election on November 9, including lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, ex-chief of staff Mark Meadows, and conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell. The pardons cover only federal charges and do not protect against state charges.
• Trump issues federal pardons for 77 people involved in 2020 election interference scheme — President Trump pardoned 77 people, including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, and John Eastman, for their roles in efforts to overturn the 2020 election through fake elector schemes and legal challenges. The pardons, announced via X by pardon attorney Ed Martin on November 10, are "full, complete and unconditional" but apply only to federal charges, leaving state-level prosecutions intact. Trump's proclamation characterized the prosecutions as "a grave national injustice" and framed the pardons as part of "national reconciliation."
• Trump issued broad pardon for 2020 election-related conduct — Justice Department pardon attorney Ed Martin posted a document on social media revealing that Trump issued a sweeping pardon covering "all United States citizens for conduct relating to the advice, creation, organization, execution, submission, support, voting, activities, participation in, or advocacy for or of any slate or proposed slate of Presidential Electors" in connection with the 2020 election, as well as conduct related to efforts to expose alleged voting fraud and vulnerabilities.
• Trump pardons eight individuals involved in 2020 election overturn efforts — Trump pardoned eight people who attempted to help him overturn the 2020 election results: Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Ken Chesebro, Christina Bobb, Kelli Ward, and Jenna Ellis. The pardons come days before a November 14 deadline for Georgia prosecutors to appoint a replacement for disqualified prosecutor Fani Willis.
• Trump grants preemptive pardons to 70+ MAGA allies including Giuliani and Meadows — Trump granted preemptive pardons to more than 70 MAGA allies, including ex-lawyer Rudy Giuliani and ex-chief of staff Mark Meadows, who worked on efforts to create fake electors to subvert Trump's 2020 election loss. The pardons were announced by pardon attorney Ed Martin via social media. None of the recipients face federal charges, though some have been charged or scrutinized by state authorities for election subversion efforts. Legal experts characterized the action as corrupt, pay-to-play, and authoritarian.
• Trump signed pardons for 77 election subversion conspirators — Trump signed pardons for 77 individuals involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, and fake electors who had already pleaded guilty. The pardons were signed Friday and announced Sunday night during government shutdown media coverage. The timing and announcement strategy obscured the action from public attention during competing news cycles.

Supporting reports

• Trump signed pardons for 77 people involved in 2020 election subversion — On November 7, 2025, President Trump signed full pardons for 77 people connected to efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, John Eastman, Kenneth Chesebro, Jenna Ellis, Jeffrey Clark, Boris Epshteyn, Christina Bobb, and fake electors from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The pardon proclamation was announced late Sunday, November 9, at 7:54 PM via social media by Ed Martin, Trump's clemency czar, timing that coincided with Senate shutdown negotiations to minimize media coverage. The pardons are federal only and do not affect pending state prosecutions in Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Nevada.
• Trump issues proclamation granting pardons for offenses related to 2020 election activities — President Donald Trump issued Proclamation 10989 on November 7, 2025, granting full, complete, and unconditional pardons to all U.S. citizens for conduct relating to advice, creation, organization, execution, submission, support, voting, activities, participation in, or advocacy for any slate or proposed slate of Presidential electors in connection with the 2020 Presidential Election, as well as efforts to expose voting fraud and vulnerabilities in that election. The proclamation names 76 individuals by name, including Sidney Powell, Rudolph Giuliani, John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark, and Mark Meadows. The pardon does not apply to Trump himself.
• Trump administration replaces clemency documents with variable signatures after identical-signature controversy — The Justice Department replaced online pardons bearing strikingly similar copies of Trump's signature with new versions showing variable signatures after public scrutiny. Seven clemency orders issued on November 7, 2025, including pardons for Darryl Strawberry, Glen Casada, and Michael McMahon, initially displayed nearly identical signatures. DOJ blamed a "technical error" and staffing issues; White House officials insisted Trump signed each pardon by hand. Handwriting experts noted that identical signatures contradict basic forensic principles.
• Trump issues broad pardon for 2020 election-related conduct, potentially covering voter fraud cases — On November 7, 2025, President Trump issued a pardon for Rudy Giuliani and others involved in the fake elector scheme. The pardon's language is sweeping, covering "any US citizen" for conduct relating to "advice, creation, organization, execution, submission, support, voting, activities, participation in, or advocacy for or of any slate or proposed slate of presidential electors" in connection with the 2020 election. Legal experts argue the pardon's broad wording may unintentionally cover citizens who committed voter fraud in 2020, such as Matthew Alan Laiss, accused of voting in both Pennsylvania and Florida. Courts must now determine the pardon's actual scope.

Supporting reports

• Trump posted that criticism of his trip constitutes treason. — Trump posted on Truth Social that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's characterization of Trump's China trip as "a total dud" was "almost treasonous," stating "If you hurt Trump's feelings it is now treason." The post equates political criticism with the constitutional crime of treason.
• Trump posted that Joe Biden should be locked up and called him a criminal. — Trump posted on Truth Social that former President Joe Biden "is a CRIMINAL AND SHOULD BE IN JAIL. A MAJOR LOWLIFE AND FAILURE. An ugly person, both inside and out!" and stated "I beat him badly." The post represents a continuation of Trump's rhetoric calling for criminal prosecution of a political opponent.

Supporting reports

• Texas governor threatens removal and extradition of absent Democratic legislators — Texas governor Greg Abbott threatened to remove from office any Democratic state representatives absent for Monday's redistricting vote and replace them with his own appointees. Abbott also suggested he would consider the Democrats felons for accepting financial support for housing and meals in Illinois, and threatened to use his extradition authority to compel their return to Texas. These threats were issued in response to the Democratic quorum break.
• Texas Gov. Abbott ordered arrest of Democratic state representatives who fled to break quorum — Texas Governor Greg Abbott ordered the arrest of Texas House Democrats who left the state to prevent a quorum on a special legislative session aimed at aggressive gerrymandering. Abbott claimed the Democrats were "abandoning their duty" and "holding hostage" flood relief legislation. The walkout, which included over 51 of 62 Democratic members, successfully blocked the session. Abbott threatened removal from office, felony bribery charges, and prosecution under a legal opinion from AG Ken Paxton, though legal experts disputed the validity of these threats.
• Abbott threatened felony bribery charges against Democratic legislators — Governor Abbott threatened to prosecute Texas House Democrats for felony bribery if they accepted travel, lodging, or meals from other state governors (such as Illinois Governor JB Pritzker) while out of state. Abbott framed acceptance of such support as a "quid pro quo" for breaking quorum. Legal experts, including Democratic Rep. Jolanda Jones, a lawyer, stated no such felony exists in Texas law and Abbott was fabricating charges.
• Texas Republicans advanced aggressive gerrymandering map in special session — Texas Governor Abbott convened a special legislative session to advance a radical gerrymandering plan that would eliminate at least five Democratic state House seats. The map was so extreme that it placed U.S. Representative Jasmine Crockett's house outside her own district and combined the districts of U.S. Representatives Greg Casar and Lloyd Doggett. Democratic legislators' walkout successfully blocked the session.
• Texas House Republicans advance redistricting plan as Democrats flee state to deny quorum — Texas House Republicans, at the direction of Governor Greg Abbott following a White House proposal, moved forward with a redistricting plan to redraw congressional lines in Republican favor. Democrats denied a quorum by leaving the state on August 4. Abbott ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to arrest and return absent Democratic lawmakers. The special session, lasting 30 days, imposes $500-per-day fines on absent members. Democrats vowed to fight the plan, which would dilute Democratic voting strength and give Republicans five additional congressional seats.
• Texas Governor Abbott announces plan to arrest Democratic representatives — Texas Governor Greg Abbott appeared on Fox News discussing his plan to hunt down and arrest Democratic representatives who refuse to show up for what the source characterizes as his "illegal gerrymander." Abbott stated that Texas officers are on the streets looking for those Democratic House members to arrest them.

Supporting reports

• Trump publicly rejects due process requirement for deportations; conservative allies call for ignoring courts and removing judges — Trump stated on Tuesday that he did not believe due process was a requirement before deporting someone, saying judges cannot require trials before deportation. Separately, conservative figures including Sean Davis (CEO of the Federalist) and Mike Davis (Article III Project) posted on X calling for the president to ignore the Supreme Court and suggesting judges should be deported. Steve Deace, a prominent conservative talk-show host, argued Trump was entitled to ignore court orders. These statements represent explicit rejection of judicial authority and rule of law.

Supporting reports

• Trump proposes deporting US citizens to El Salvador; AG Bondi declines to confirm legality — On Monday, President Trump proposed deporting US citizens convicted of serious crimes to El Salvador for imprisonment, citing violent offenders. During a Tuesday Fox News interview, Attorney General Pam Bondi declined to affirm the proposal's legality, instead emphasizing crime reduction and incapacitation. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt characterized it as a "legal question" under review. Legal experts, including immigration law professors, stated the proposal is clearly illegal and unconstitutional under US law.
• White House press secretary defends potential deportation of U.S. citizens — White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that "The president's idea for American citizens to potentially be deported, these would be heinous violent criminals who have broken our nation's laws repeatedly." The article notes that days earlier, Trump suggested that a former government employee was guilty of treason for writing a book about his time in the first Trump administration that Trump claimed was "designed to sow chaos and distrust" in the government, illustrating the administration's expansive definition of criminal conduct.
• Trump told Bukele he wants to go after "home-growns" next, suggesting sending US citizens to El Salvador — Before the press pool entered the Oval Office for the meeting with Bukele, Trump was heard on a government live stream telling Bukele he wants to go after the "home-growns" next, suggesting he would send US citizens to El Salvador. Speaking to reporters, Trump said he has no problem sending naturalized American citizens there.
• Trump stated intent to deport "homegrown criminals" including those who "push people into subways" — Trump told press he wants to expand deportation authority to include what he termed "homegrown criminals" who commit violent acts such as pushing people into subways. He stated he had instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to explore legal mechanisms for this expansion, saying "we always have to obey the laws, but we also have homegrown criminals that push people into subways. I'd like to include them in the group of people to get them out of the country."
• Trump stated intention to send U.S. citizens to El Salvador for imprisonment — During a meeting with El Salvador President Nayib Bukele in the Oval Office, Trump stated his intention to begin sending U.S. citizens to El Salvador for imprisonment, as documented in video clips from the meeting.
• Trump reiterated he would "love" to send US citizens to El Salvador mega-prison — Trump reiterated that he "would love" to send US citizens to El Salvador's mega-prison. The statement represents continued expression of intent to deport US citizens.
• White House press secretary said sending US citizens to El Salvador is "a legal question" — During a press briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the prospect of sending US citizens to El Salvador is "a legal question that the president is looking into." The statement suggests the administration is seriously considering deporting US citizens.

Supporting reports

• Trump claims Biden's pardons are invalid — Trump declared that pardons issued by President Biden to members of the January 6 Committee are invalid, claiming they were signed by autopen and thus void. This assertion challenges the legitimacy of presidential pardon powers and could lead to legal and political conflicts over the scope of executive authority.
• Trump declared Biden pardons void — On Truth Social, Trump declared that the pardons issued by President Joe Biden in mid-January are "void, vacant and of no further force or effect," claiming they were signed with autopen. The pardons included members of Congress on the Jan. 6 Select Committee, Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Biden's family members.
• Trump claims Biden's pardons are void — Donald Trump claimed that pardons signed by President Joe Biden were "void, vacant and of no further force and effect" because they were signed with an autopen. Trump made this claim on his social media platform and reiterated it to reporters on Air Force One. The claim follows a report by the Heritage Foundation criticizing Biden's use of the autopen. However, historical precedent and legal interpretations suggest that the method of signing does not invalidate presidential pardons. Biden had issued pre-emptive pardons to family members and members of the House committee investigating the January 6 attack.
• Trump declares Biden's pardons void — President Donald Trump declared the presidential pardons issued by his predecessor, President Joe Biden, "VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT." This statement implies a belief that he can unilaterally alter the legal status of pardons, which is not supported by the Constitution.
• Trump Declares Biden's Pardons Void — President Donald Trump declared the presidential pardons issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden, as “VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT.” This statement suggests an intention to investigate members of the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack, challenging the legal standing of presidential pardons.

Supporting reports

• Trump pardons January 6 rioters — President Trump commuted the sentences of or pardoned 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riot, including those who attacked police officers. This decision has been praised by some as ending a "prosecutorial nightmare" but criticized by others for undermining accountability for the attack on democratic institutions.
• Trump pardons Oathkeepers leader Stewart Rhodes — Former President Donald Trump pardoned Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the Oathkeepers, who was serving a 22-year sentence for seditious conspiracy related to the January 6 Capitol riot. This pardon has sparked controversy and criticism, as it is seen as undermining accountability for those involved in the insurrection. The decision has been condemned by law enforcement and political leaders who view it as a dangerous precedent.
• Trump issued executive order pardoning January 6 attackers — Former President Donald Trump issued an executive order granting pardons to individuals convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack. This move was part of his campaign promises after winning back the presidency in November. The pardons were extended to 1,500 people charged or convicted for their roles in the attack. However, some individuals, including Jason Riddle and Pamela Hemphill, have publicly rejected the pardons, citing personal responsibility and concerns about the implications of accepting clemency.
• Trump issues blanket pardons for January 6 Capitol attackers — Former President Donald Trump issued blanket pardons for approximately 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. This decision has been met with criticism from various quarters, including Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who expressed concern that such pardons could lead to further violence. Vice-President JD Vance defended the pardons, claiming they addressed a denial of due process and constitutional rights, despite evidence supporting many of the convictions. The pardons have sparked a debate on the use of presidential pardon power and its implications for justice and public safety.
• Trump issues 1,500 ‘unconditional’ pardons over January 6 Capitol attack — On the first day of his second term, Donald Trump issued 1,500 unconditional pardons to individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Among those pardoned was Matthew Huttle, who had been sentenced to six months in prison for his participation. The pardons have raised concerns among law enforcement and political violence experts about potential future acts of violence. The pardons were part of a broader move by Trump to absolve those who supported his claims of election fraud.

Supporting reports

• Presidential Pardons and Commutations for January 6 Offenses — The President issued a proclamation granting pardons and commuting sentences for individuals convicted of offenses related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol events. The proclamation commutes sentences to time served for specific individuals and grants full pardons to others. The Attorney General is directed to issue certificates of pardon and ensure the release of those currently imprisoned. Pending indictments related to the events are to be dismissed with prejudice.
• Biden commutes life sentence of Leonard Peltier — President Joe Biden commuted the life sentence of Leonard Peltier, an Indigenous activist convicted of the 1975 murder of two FBI agents. Peltier, who is 80 years old and in poor health, will serve the remainder of his sentence in home confinement. The commutation was supported by various groups, including Tribal Nations and human rights organizations, due to Peltier's age, health, and the length of his imprisonment. Peltier has maintained his innocence, and his case has been criticized for prosecutorial misconduct and withheld evidence.
• Biden issues last-minute pardons — Former President Joe Biden issued last-minute pardons to several individuals, including family members, former officials, and members of the January 6 Capitol attack investigative committee. The pardons were intended to protect these individuals from potential retribution by the incoming administration of Donald Trump. Biden emphasized that the pardons should not be seen as an admission of guilt. The move has sparked criticism from both political sides, with concerns about the implications of preemptive pardons and their potential to undermine the rule of law.
• Biden issues pre-emptive pardons to politicians and family members — On the last day of his presidency, Joe Biden issued pre-emptive pardons to several politicians, public servants, and family members. This included figures like Anthony Fauci, Mark Milley, Liz Cheney, and Adam Kinzinger, as well as members of the House committee that investigated the January 6 Capitol attack. Biden's family members, including his brothers and sister, were also pardoned. The pardons were issued to protect these individuals from potential "revenge" prosecutions by the incoming Trump administration.
• Trump issued over 1,600 clemency acts since second term, bypassing standard review process; at least a dozen beneficiaries arrested for subsequent crimes — President Trump has granted clemency to more than 1,600 people since taking office in his second term, most for January 6 Capitol rioters, without following the traditional Justice Department review process. Legal experts note that at least a dozen clemency recipients have been arrested for separate crimes after their release, including individuals convicted of child exploitation, burglary, theft, and assault. Trump reportedly bypassed the Office of the Pardon Attorney review, issuing 1,500 pardons on his first day in office. Experts argue this approach undermines the rule of law and signals to recipients that their original conduct was acceptable.
• Trump issues 1,500 pardons over January 6 attack — On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump issued "full, complete and unconditional" presidential pardons for approximately 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack. This action fulfilled a campaign promise made by Trump during his second presidential term. The pardons included individuals convicted of violent acts during the insurrection. Trump also commuted sentences for more than a dozen cases and directed the Department of Justice to dismiss all pending indictments related to the January 6 events. The move has been criticized by democracy advocacy groups as an affront to the rule of law.
• Trump issues mass pardons and commutations for January 6 Capitol attack defendants — On January 20, 2025, President Trump granted "full, complete and unconditional" pardons to approximately 1,500 people charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack, including those convicted of violent acts. He also issued sentence-shortening commutations for more than a dozen cases and directed the Department of Justice to dismiss all pending indictments related to the attack. Former Capitol attack prosecutor Greg Rosen resigned and criticized the pardons as sending "a terrible message" that political violence toward political goals is acceptable in a democratic society.
• Trump pardoned January 6 attackers — On January 20, Donald Trump issued unconditional pardons to 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol attack, including Emily Hernandez. Hernandez had previously served 30 days in federal prison for her role in the attack. The pardons were part of Trump's actions at the start of his second presidency. This clemency has been criticized for potentially encouraging violence in support of Trump, as noted by California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff.
• Trump pardoned January 6 rioters — On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump, after retaking the presidency, issued a mass clemency for over 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol attack, including Matthew Huttle. This act of clemency was criticized by various groups, including the Fraternal Order of Police, who argued that such pardons undermine the rule of law and public safety. The pardons have led to further legal issues for some of the recipients, including Huttle, who was later involved in a fatal encounter with law enforcement.
• Trump pardons January 6 insurrectionists — President Donald Trump issued pardons, commuted sentences, or dismissed cases for over 1,500 individuals charged with crimes related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack. This sweeping action included more than 250 people convicted of assault charges, some of whom attacked police officers. The pardons have sparked controversy, with some Republican senators condemning the move, while others have supported it. Police unions expressed disappointment, and the pardons are seen as a loyalty test for the Republican party.
• Trump pardons January 6 rioter Andrew Taake — On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump announced and signed pardons for individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the US Capitol. This decision was made during his inauguration ceremony and was part of a broader set of executive actions aimed at reversing Biden-era policies. The pardons were presented as a gesture of support for those Trump referred to as "J6 hostages," conflating them with other hostages held abroad.
• Trump pardons January 6 rioters — Former President Donald Trump issued a pardon for Andrew Taake, a convicted participant in the January 6 Capitol attack, at the start of his second presidency. Taake had been sentenced to prison for assaulting police officers during the insurrection. Despite the pardon, Taake faced unresolved charges related to soliciting a minor, which were filed before the Capitol attack. His release from federal prison was part of a controversial blanket pardon for 1,500 individuals involved in the insurrection.
• Trump signs executive orders pardoning January 6 convicts — On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump, upon retaking the presidency, issued blanket pardons or commutations to 1,500 individuals charged or convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. This decision has faced bipartisan criticism, particularly from law enforcement organizations, for undermining accountability and the rule of law. The pardons were a key campaign promise by Trump during his bid to return to the Oval Office. The Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Chiefs of Police have publicly condemned the pardons.
• Trump pardoned Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and commuted Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes's sentence — On his first day back in office, President Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders, including granting full pardons to approximately 1,500 individuals convicted of charges related to the January 6 Capitol attack. This move was part of a broader set of actions taken by Trump to assert control over the federal government and reshape the executive branch according to his agenda. The pardons were issued during a signing ceremony at the US Capitol, marking a significant and controversial use of presidential power.
• Trump issued pardons and commutations for Capitol insurrection participants — Upon taking office in 2025, Trump pardoned Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, who had been sentenced to 22 years in prison for his role in the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack intended to overturn the 2020 election results. Trump also commuted the sentence of Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes to time served, releasing him from prison after Rhodes had been sentenced to 18 years for his role in the same attack.
• Trump issued proclamation commuting sentences and pardoning January 6 Capitol riot participants — On his first day as president, Trump issued sweeping pardons and commutations for individuals involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection. In the presidential action, Trump characterized the pardons and commutations as ending "a grave national injustice," effectively reversing criminal accountability for participants in the violent attack on the Capitol building that disrupted the peaceful transfer of power.
• Trump pardons Jan. 6 rioters — President Trump issued a proclamation on January 20, 2025, commuting the sentences of 14 individuals convicted of offenses related to the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot to time served, and granting full pardons to all other individuals convicted of offenses related to those events. The proclamation directs the Attorney General to issue certificates of pardon immediately, release all such individuals from prison, and pursue dismissal with prejudice of all pending indictments related to January 6 conduct.
• Approximately 1,500 January 6 defendants pardoned or commuted at start of 2025 term — On January 20, 2025, President Trump pardoned more than 1,200 convicted Jan. 6 rioters, including the leader of the Proud Boys, and commuted the sentence of the leader of the Oath Keepers. He also directed the Justice Department to drop 300 pending cases related to the 2021 insurrection. These actions have been criticized for undermining the rule of law and accountability for the insurrection.
• Trump commuted sentences of Proud Boys and Oathkeepers leaders — The Trump administration pardoned or commuted approximately 1,500 defendants charged or convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack, including high-profile leaders convicted of seditious conspiracy. The action occurred at the start of the 2025 term and was documented through reporting roundups and case coverage.
• Trump commuted sentences of Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht — Donald Trump commuted the sentences of leaders from the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers, as well as individuals involved in violent acts against police officers during the January 6th Capitol riot. This decision has sparked significant backlash from law enforcement and political figures, who view it as undermining the rule of law and justice for those who attacked officers.
• Trump issued pardons and commutations for January 6 defendants — Donald Trump commuted the two life sentences of Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the Silk Road dark web marketplace. Ulbricht's platform was known for facilitating illegal drug transactions globally. The commutation of his sentence raises concerns about the message it sends regarding cybercrime and drug trafficking.
• Trump issues pardons for January 6 defendants — On January 20, 2025, Trump issued pardons for offenders and commutations related to the January 6 Capitol attack. Trump directed the DOJ to dismiss cases currently in progress. Trump stated he pardoned approximately 1,500 defendants charged in the January 6 attack and issued six commutations. Trump made pardoning January 6 defendants a core campaign promise, featuring prisoners singing the national anthem at rallies. DOJ investigations into January 6 crimes are expected to cease.
• Trump plans mass pardons for January 6 defendants — President Donald Trump issued pardons for approximately 1,500 individuals charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack. He also directed the Department of Justice to dismiss ongoing cases. This action fulfills a campaign promise and is expected to halt federal investigations into the events of January 6.
• Trump signs executive orders pardoning January 6 rioters — Donald Trump has promised to begin reviewing cases for pardons of January 6 defendants within the first nine minutes of his presidency. With over 1,580 defendants charged and 1,270 convicted, this could represent one of the largest mass pardons in American history. Many potential recipients have already completed their sentences, making some pardons largely symbolic.
• Trump pardons Enrique Tarrio for January 6 role — Donald Trump, in his second term as US president, signed executive orders granting "full, complete and unconditional" pardons to approximately 1,500 individuals convicted of crimes related to the January 6 attack on Congress. This includes rightwing extremists convicted of seditious conspiracy. The pardons were part of a series of executive actions taken by Trump upon his return to the White House. The move has been criticized as an insult to the justice system and those who defended the Capitol.
• Trump grants full pardon to Andrew Zabavsky for January 6 Capitol riot convictions — Former President Donald Trump issued pardons for individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection. This decision has been met with criticism from law enforcement organizations, including the Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Chiefs of Police, who argue that it undermines accountability and could embolden future acts of violence against law enforcement.
• Trump grants full pardon to Terence Sutton for January 6 convictions — Former President Donald Trump pardoned Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys, for his involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot. Tarrio, who was released from prison on January 22, 2025, expressed gratitude to Trump, stating that the pardon "literally gave me my life back." Tarrio's release and pardon have emboldened far-right militia groups, who are now regrouping and planning their next steps. The pardons have sparked concern among law enforcement officers who were involved in the January 6 cases, fearing for their safety.
• Trump issues pardon for DC police officers — President Donald Trump commuted the sentences of or pardoned all individuals convicted of crimes related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. This action was met with mixed reactions, including disapproval from some Republican lawmakers and the D.C. Police Union, which expressed dismay over the pardons. The move signals Trump's intent to support his base while undermining the judicial system's accountability efforts.
• Executive Order on AI Leadership — President Trump issued an executive grant of clemency on January 22, 2025, granting Andrew Zabavsky a full and unconditional pardon for convictions in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Zabavsky was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy) and § 1512 (obstruction), sentenced on September 12, 2024, to 48 months imprisonment on each count (concurrent), 3 years supervised release, and a $200 special assessment. The pardon nullifies the sentence and conviction.
• Trump issued pardons for January 6 participants — President Trump issued an executive grant of clemency on January 22, 2025, granting a full and unconditional pardon to Terence Sutton. Sutton had been convicted in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on charges including violations of D.C. Code § 2103, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy), and 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (obstruction of justice). He was sentenced on September 12, 2024, to concurrent sentences totaling 66 months imprisonment, 3 years supervised release, and a $300 special assessment. The pardon erases the conviction and sentence.
• Trump issues pardons for January 6 participants — President Trump issued a "full and unconditional pardon" on January 22, 2025, to two DC police officers involved in the death of 20-year-old Karon Hylton-Brown. This action has sparked controversy and raised concerns about accountability and the message it sends regarding police conduct.
• Trump issues pardons for January 6 rioters — President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14179 on January 23, 2025, to remove barriers to American leadership in artificial intelligence (AI). The order revokes existing AI policies that hinder innovation and mandates the development of an action plan to sustain and enhance U.S. global AI dominance. It also requires a review and potential revision of policies inconsistent with this new directive.
• — Former President Donald Trump issued "full, complete and unconditional" pardons for 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. This move has been met with mixed reactions, with some praising the decision while others, like Pamela Hemphill, have refused to accept the pardon. Hemphill, who was arrested for her involvement in the attack, insists on taking responsibility for her actions and plans to file a letter of rejection for the pardon.
• — Former President Donald Trump issued pardons to over 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection, including those convicted of assaulting police officers. The pardons were criticized by federal judges, who described them as based on a "revisionist myth" and incapable of erasing the violence and terror of the event. The pardons have caused division within the Republican Party, with some members supporting the move and others, like Mitch McConnell, condemning it. The pardons were issued as one of Trump's first acts upon taking office.
• — Trump decided to pardon or commute the sentences of all individuals convicted for their involvement in the January 6 riots, including those who attacked police officers. This decision has sparked controversy and concern, particularly from law enforcement groups and victims of the riots. Critics argue that this undermines the rule of law and public safety. Jackson Reffitt, a key witness against his father, expressed fear for his safety now that his father is free.
• — President Donald Trump, in an interview, defended his pardons for January 6 rioters, downplaying the violence against police officers during the Capitol attack. Approximately 600 rioters faced charges related to assaulting law enforcement, with ten convicted of sedition. Trump's actions have drawn criticism from federal judges who emphasize the importance of maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. The pardons have sparked discussions among pardoned rioters about running for office, indicating a potential shift in political dynamics.
• — President Donald Trump issued pardons for nearly two dozen individuals convicted in connection with the January 6 Capitol riot, claiming the violence against police was minor. This action has drawn criticism from federal judges and has implications for ongoing legal proceedings against other defendants. U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly emphasized that pardons do not alter the historical record of the events of January 6.