Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Trump posted statements about Iran war ammunition — Trump posted multiple statements on social media regarding the Iran military operation, claiming the U.S. has "virtually unlimited amounts of Mid to High Grade Ammunition" and is "producing Munitions at levels never seen before." Trump characterized media outlets and people reporting ammunition shortages as "treasonous" and stated they would "rather see the United States LOSE a War that we're easily WINNING, than see me WIN."

Supporting reports

• Trump threatens prosecution of leakers over munitions shortage reports — President Trump publicly attacked media reports of US munitions shortages in the Iran conflict, threatening "long term jail sentences" for officials leaking information about weapons stockpiles. The reports alleged Trump had confronted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over alleged shortages at a Camp David meeting. Trump denied the shortages, claimed massive ammunition supplies, and ordered investigations into the disclosures. The White House and Pentagon rejected the accounts as false.
• U.S. Munitions Stockpile Depletion Reported — Reports have emerged that the United States has depleted its stockpile of long-range precision missiles due to the ongoing conflict with Iran. President Trump has dismissed these reports as "fake news" while simultaneously calling for the prosecution of those who leaked the information. The depletion has reportedly led to a crisis meeting at the Pentagon and a confrontation between Trump and Pete Hegseth at Camp David.

Supporting reports

• Major Jason Watson arrested at Capitol in uniform during protest against administration Iran policy — Major Jason Watson, a 17-year Air Force officer, stood on the Capitol steps in uniform on July 1, 2026, holding a sign reading "Impeach. Convict. Remove," and was arrested. DC criminal charges have been declined for prosecution, but an Air Force investigation remains open covering four articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice: contempt toward officials, failure to obey an order, conduct unbecoming an officer, and conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. Watson is restricted to Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling and placed under a written gag order prohibiting contact with the press or posting about his case.
• Active-duty Air Force officer publicly called for Trump and Vance impeachment — Active-duty Air Force Major Jason Watson stood on the Capitol steps in uniform holding a sign reading "Impeach Convict Remove" and publicly called for the impeachment, conviction, and removal of Trump and Vice President JD Vance. He is believed to be the first active-duty commissioned officer to do so publicly. The Air Force has opened an investigation that could end his career of more than twenty years; military rules sharply limit political activity in uniform. Watson stated he was willing to pay the price for his constitutional stand.

Supporting reports

• Trump posted on Truth Social accusing media of "virtual treason" for reporting on Iranian military performance — Trump posted on Truth Social while en route to China: "When the Fake News says that the Iranian enemy is doing well, Militarily, against us, it's virtual TREASON in that it is such a false, and even preposterous, statement. They are aiding and abetting the enemy!" He characterized journalists as "American cowards that are rooting against our Country" and "Losers, Ingrates, and Fools."
• Trump posted AI images of U.S. military destroying Iran and labeled media coverage of Iran as treason — The president posted AI-generated images depicting the U.S. military destroying the Iranian military, then posted that media reports characterizing Iran as doing well militarily against the U.S. constituted "virtual TREASON" because such statements were "aiding and abetting the enemy." He also posted an image of a map with Venezuela overlaid with the U.S. flag captioned "51st State."
• Trump attacked reporter aboard Air Force One — Trump called a reporter "treasonous" for reporting accurately about Iran during the Air Force One press conference, using the accusation as a response to critical questioning.
• Trump accuses New York Times reporter of treason — Trump lashed out at New York Times reporter David Sanger after Sanger pointed out that Trump's military actions have not resulted in political change in Iran. Trump declared that Sanger's reporting was "sort of treasonous," using inflammatory language to attack a journalist for factual criticism. The statement represents an attempt to intimidate the press through accusations of disloyalty.

Supporting reports

• Federal agents shot Alex Pretti repeatedly and government labeled him terrorist without evidence — Federal agents shot Alex Pretti repeatedly. The government subsequently labeled him a terrorist without providing evidence to support the designation. The killing and labeling prompted growing outrage over state violence and abuse of power, with former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg noting the incident was galvanizing Americans across party lines.
• Two federal agents identified in fatal shooting of Alex Pretti — Government documents identified Jesus Ochoa (border patrol agent) and Raymundo Gutierrez (CBP officer) as the federal agents who fatally shot Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old ICU nurse, during a confrontation in Minneapolis on an unspecified date in late January 2026. The shooting occurred during Operation Metro Surge, a large-scale immigration enforcement initiative. CBP initially withheld the agents' names; the Department of Homeland Security placed both on leave. The Justice Department's civil rights division opened an investigation following days of protests and congressional pressure.

Supporting reports

• Border Patrol commander claimed federal agents were victims of shooting — U.S. Border Patrol commander Greg Bovino appeared on CNN's State of the Union and claimed that the true victims of the previous day's shooting were the federal agents involved, not Alex Pretti. Bovino confirmed that the agents who killed Pretti remain on duty, though reassigned elsewhere.
• FBI director claimed Pretti's weapon proved intent to cause trouble — FBI director Kash Patel appeared on Fox News Channel and claimed that the fact Alex Pretti was carrying a weapon proved he was planning trouble, despite Pretti having a legal permit and carrying the weapon as part of his participation in a community-led first-responder network.
• Border Patrol official claims recording police is violence — Border Patrol leader Greg Bovino was pressed on Sunday morning television about claims that Alex Pretti intended to "massacre law enforcement." When asked directly what evidence supported the accusation, Bovino praised law enforcement for preventing something that video evidence does not show was ever going to happen, and characterized Border Patrol agents as "the victims," implying that recording police constitutes violence justifying lethal response.
• Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche appeared on NBC and characterized Pretti's presence at the scene as "not a peaceful protest" and questioned whether he was disarmed. — Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche appeared on NBC and stated that Pretti "was not protesting peacefully" because "He was screaming in the face of ICE. He had a phone up right in ICE's face." When asked if video shows an officer removing a gun before shots were fired, Blanche stated "I do not know and nobody else knows either, which is why we're doing an investigation." When pressed on whether Pretti brandished a gun, Blanche deflected: "We don't know what ICE saw." Blanche also reframed the issue, stating "Every American should be bothered. But they should be bothered that ICE is going to arrest a criminal and they have zero support from local law enforcement."
• FBI Director Kash Patel stated on Fox News that people "do not get to attack law enforcement officials in this country without any repercussions" and declined to address whether Pretti brandished a weapon. — FBI Director Kash Patel appeared on Maria Bartiromo's Fox News show and stated "You do not get to attack law enforcement officials in this country without any repercussions. We not messing around." When Bartiromo asked how Pretti was threatening Border Patrol or using a gun to threaten, Patel deferred to DHS, saying "That's something I'll let DHS because they are investigating that case." When asked if Pretti brandished a gun, Patel responded "We don't know what ICE saw," avoiding a direct answer despite video evidence showing Pretti holding a phone.
• FBI Director Kash Patel stated that Governor Walz's rhetoric encouraging people to film ICE agents "is exactly what's leading to violence" and should be "examined thoroughly." — FBI Director Kash Patel was asked to respond to a video of Governor Tim Walz telling people to film ICE agents. Patel stated "I think that type of rhetoric is exactly what's leading to violence - it should be examined thoroughly as to anyone who's involved in inciting this type of violence."
• Pete Hegseth posted support for ICE agents and criticism of Minnesota leadership. — Pete Hegseth posted "Thank God for the patriots of ICE - we have your back 100%. You are SAVING the country. Shame on the leadership of Minnesota - and the lunatics in the street. ICE > MN."
• President Trump posted a statement mischaracterizing Pretti's actions and calling for local police to be removed from ICE operations. — President Trump posted on social media hours after the shooting, stating Pretti had a "loaded" gun "with two additional full magazines" and asking "Where are the local Police? Why weren't they allowed to protect ICE Officers?" Trump claimed the Mayor and Governor "called them off" and asserted that "many of these Police were not allowed to do their job." He concluded by urging "LET OUR ICE PATRIOTS DO THEIR JOB!" The post echoed false DHS characterizations and contradicted video evidence showing Pretti holding a phone, not a gun.
• Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated Pretti "brought a semiautomatic weapon to what was supposed to be a peaceful protest" despite no evidence of brandishing. — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appeared on ABC and stated "I'm sorry he is dead, but he did bring a semiautomatic weapon to what was supposed to be a peaceful protest." When the host noted there is no evidence Pretti brandished the gun, Bessent responded "But he brought a gun!" The host countered "We do have a second amendment in this country," highlighting the constitutional right to carry a lawfully permitted firearm.
• Vice President JD Vance posted that the ICE situation in Minneapolis is the result of "far left agitators, working with local authorities" and blamed local leadership for refusing to cooperate with ICE. — Vice President JD Vance posted on social media that "This level of engineered chaos is unique to Minneapolis. It is the direct consequence of far left agitators, working with local authorities." He also stated "When I visited Minnesota, what the ICE agents wanted more than anything was to work with local law enforcement so that situations on the ground didn't get out of hand. The local leadership in MN has so far refused to answer those requests." Vance retweeted a post from Stephen Miller characterizing Pretti as "An assassin tried to murder federal agents."
• Kash Patel declares firearms prohibited at protests — White House official Kash Patel declared on a Sunday morning show that individuals cannot bring loaded firearms with multiple magazines to any protest, effectively redefining the scope of First and Second Amendment protections. He simultaneously claimed the administration protects First Amendment speech while redefining peaceful protest to exclude those who record law enforcement or stand near demonstrations.
• Rep. Scalise redefines lawful firearm possession as crime at protests — Republican Rep. Steve Scalise appeared on a Sunday morning show and attempted to reconcile support for concealed carry with a claim that no one may carry a firearm while committing another crime. He implied that Alex Pretti, who was lawfully armed and filming law enforcement at a protest, had committed a crime, despite video evidence showing no criminal conduct and Minnesota authorities confirming lawful carry.
• Republican Senator Mike Lee called for the National Guard to be sent to Minneapolis. — Republican Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) posted "Send in the National Guard" in response to the Pretti shooting and the broader ICE operations in Minneapolis.
• Secretary Noem misrepresents Minnesota law on concealed carry at protests — Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem appeared on a Sunday morning show and misstated Minnesota concealed carry law, implying that permit holders should leave firearms behind if they intend to protest. When confronted with evidence that Alex Pretti was legally permitted to carry, she defaulted to claims about impeding law enforcement operations and consequences, without addressing the lawfulness of his conduct.
• Treasury Secretary Bessent defends use of lethal force against armed protester — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appeared on a Sunday morning television show and defended the killing of Alex Pretti, a legally armed protester in Minneapolis, by stating that Pretti's lawful possession of a loaded nine-millimeter semi-automatic weapon with two cartridges at a protest justified the use of force. Bessent characterized protesters as "paid agitators" and blamed state leaders while ignoring that lawful concealed carry is constitutionally protected.

Supporting reports

• Secretary Noem falsely labeled killed woman as domestic terrorist — Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem falsely claimed that Renee Good, who was killed by ICE agent Jonathan Ross, attempted to run over the agent and characterized her death as "an act of domestic terrorism." Vice President J.D. Vance suggested that protesters are engaging in "domestic terror techniques." These characterizations misapply the legal definition of domestic terrorism, which requires commission of one of 51 specific federal crimes involving weapons of mass destruction or air piracy.

Supporting reports

• Medical examiner ruled detainee death in ICE custody a homicide — The El Paso County Office of the Medical Examiner ruled that the death of 55-year-old Cuban-born Geraldo Lunas Campos, detained at Camp East Montana in El Paso, Texas, was a homicide. Lunas Campos died of asphyxiation after guards applied pressure to his neck and chest during an altercation in which he requested medication. Two detainees testified they witnessed guards choking Lunas Campos, who repeatedly stated he could not breathe. The Trump administration subsequently attempted to deport the two witnesses. At least 30 people died in ICE detention in the previous year, the highest number in twenty years, with six deaths in the first two weeks of 2026.
• Secretary Noem falsely labeled killed woman as domestic terrorist — Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem falsely claimed that Renee Good, who was killed by ICE agent Jonathan Ross, attempted to run over the agent and characterized her death as "an act of domestic terrorism." Vice President J.D. Vance suggested that protesters are engaging in "domestic terror techniques." These characterizations misapply the legal definition of domestic terrorism, which requires commission of one of 51 specific federal crimes involving weapons of mass destruction or air piracy.

Supporting reports

• Senator Mark Kelly sued Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for military censure in retaliation for protected speech — Democratic Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona filed a lawsuit against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Defense Department, Navy Secretary John Phelan, and the Navy Department, alleging violations of his First Amendment rights, the Speech and Debate Clause, separation of powers, due process, federal law governing retired officer ranks (10 USC 1370), and the Administrative Procedure Act. The suit challenges Hegseth's January 5 formal censure of Kelly, which followed Kelly's November 18 participation in a video with five other Democratic veterans in Congress warning military and intelligence personnel that they have a legal duty to refuse unlawful orders. The lawsuit seeks to declare the censure and related actions unlawful and unconstitutional, vacate them, and enjoin their enforcement.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Kelly v. Hegseth (D.D.C.) 1:26-cv-00081 — Plaintiff moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.
• Sen. Kelly sued Secretary Hegseth to block reduction of his Navy rank and retirement pay for protected speech — Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) filed a lawsuit against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seeking an injunction to prevent unilateral reduction of Kelly's Navy rank and retirement pay in retaliation for a video urging service members not to follow unlawful orders. Kelly's complaint alleges First Amendment violation, retaliation for protected legislative speech, and an unprecedented executive attack on congressional independence and military oversight authority.
• Senator Kelly sued Defense Secretary Hegseth over military retaliation — Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) sued Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the Pentagon to block their efforts to punish him for a video he participated in last year with other Democratic lawmakers calling on military members to refuse illegal orders, asking a federal judge to find the move "unlawful and unconstitutional."
• Mark Kelly sues Hegseth over military rank reduction and pension censure — Democratic Senator Mark Kelly filed a lawsuit in Washington DC federal court challenging Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's formal censure and threatened demotion/pension reduction. The censure targeted Kelly and five other military-veteran lawmakers for a November video urging service members to resist unlawful orders. Kelly argues the action violates free speech, legislative independence, and separation of powers. The lawsuit names Hegseth, the Department of Defense, the Navy, and Navy Secretary John Phelan as defendants and seeks to vacate the censure and all related actions.
• Senator Mark Kelly files lawsuit against Defense Secretary Hegseth over retaliation for protected speech — Senator Mark Kelly filed a lawsuit seeking to nullify Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's attempt to reduce his rank and pension as punishment for the video urging troops to refuse illegal orders. Kelly characterized Hegseth's actions as an "unconstitutional crusade" that sends a chilling message to retired military members that speaking against the administration will result in loss of rank and pay. Kelly argued that such retaliation violates constitutional protections and sets a dangerous precedent for suppressing military veterans' free speech.
• Pentagon censures Senator Mark Kelly and launches administrative proceedings — Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth formally censured Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain, in January and initiated administrative proceedings that could result in rank reduction and pension cuts. Kelly participated in the same November video about military duty to illegal orders. Kelly has responded with litigation arguing the Pentagon's actions violate constitutional protections.

Supporting reports

• Senator Slotkin said she is under federal investigation — Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) said in an interview that federal prosecutors are investigating her for participating in a video with other Democratic lawmakers calling on military members to refuse illegal orders.
• DOJ threatens Federal Reserve with criminal indictment over interest rate policy — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell publicly stated that the Department of Justice threatened criminal charges against the Fed related to a multi-year renovation project of Federal Reserve office buildings. Powell characterized the threat as retaliation for the Fed's decision to set interest rates based on economic conditions rather than presidential preference, stating the threat was "a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President."
• Federal investigation opened against Michigan senator Elissa Slotkin for video urging troops to refuse illegal orders — Michigan senator Elissa Slotkin announced she is under federal investigation by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for her participation in a video released in 2025 in which she and five other Democratic lawmakers with military backgrounds urged U.S. troops to refuse unlawful orders. The video's message aligns with established military law and constitutional principle. President Trump called the video "seditious behavior by traitors" punishable by death; the White House later clarified he did not seek execution but wanted them "held accountable." Slotkin characterized the investigation as weaponization of federal government to intimidate political opponents.
• Senator Elissa Slotkin faces federal criminal investigation for oath video — Senator Elissa Slotkin is now under federal criminal investigation for appearing in a video urging service members to remember their oath and refuse illegal orders. The investigation represents potential criminalization of speech encouraging military personnel to uphold constitutional obligations and refuse unlawful commands.
• Four additional Democratic lawmakers said they are under investigation — Four additional Democratic lawmakers said they are being investigated by the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia over their participation in a viral video calling on military members to refuse illegal orders.
• Trump DOJ investigates Democratic lawmakers over military video on illegal orders — Three House Democrats—Jason Crow (Colorado), Maggie Goodlander (New Hampshire), and Chrissy Houlahan (Pennsylvania)—confirmed that the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C., led by Jeanine Pirro, requested interviews regarding their participation in a November video instructing troops they need not comply with illegal orders. The investigation expands to five lawmakers total; the Pentagon also formally censured Senator Mark Kelly and launched administrative proceedings. Trump called the video "seditious" and threatened capital punishment, later walking back but maintaining the lawmakers face "serious jeopardy."

Supporting reports

• ICE agent fatally shoots Renee Nicole Good during Minneapolis immigration operation — An ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, 37, during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. DHS and ICE immediately characterized the shooting as lawful self-defense, claiming Good "weaponized" her vehicle and attempted to run over agents. Trump administration officials invoked "domestic terrorism" to describe the incident. However, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Governor Tim Walz publicly rejected the federal narrative. Video reviewed by Reuters describes the vehicle maneuvering away while agents crowded close, with shots fired as Good appeared to be driving away, contradicting DHS claims. The full evidence record remains unreleased.
• ICE agent shoots and kills Renee Nicole Good during Minneapolis immigration operation — On January 7, 2026, a 37-year-old woman named Renee Nicole Good was shot and killed by an ICE agent during a federal immigration surge operation in Minneapolis. DHS and the Trump administration immediately characterized the shooting as lawful self-defense, claiming Good "weaponized" her vehicle and attempted to run over agents. However, Reuters-reviewed video footage and local reporting describe Good's vehicle maneuvering away from agents while they crowded close, followed by shots fired as she appeared to be driving away. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey publicly rejected the federal narrative, and state and federal investigations are underway.
• Federal agent fatally shoots Renee Good in south Minneapolis — A federal agent fatally shot Renee Good, a 37-year-old US citizen, in south Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. The killing marked the first fatal shooting by federal agents during ICE enforcement operations in the city and triggered widespread community opposition, protests, and calls for ICE to cease operations in Minnesota.
• Federal agents shoot and kill Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis during immigration enforcement operation — Federal immigration agents under the Trump administration shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen, in Minneapolis on January 7 during an enforcement operation. The killing sparked public outrage and became a focal point for nationwide protests against ICE and the administration's immigration policies. The incident occurred during a nearly month-long federal operation in Minneapolis targeting immigration enforcement.
• Federal ICE agent fatally shoots woman in Minneapolis — A federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, 37, in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. The incident occurred during an enforcement action and sparked immediate public outcry, with Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey calling for ICE to leave the city. Cable news networks covered the shooting with varying framings and brought on former government officials to analyze the incident, with commentary ranging from criticism of ICE training and vetting to blame directed at protesters and elected officials.
• Federal ICE agent kills Renee Nicole Good during enforcement operation — A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent killed Renee Nicole Good during an enforcement operation in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. DHS initially claimed Good attacked the federal agent, but video evidence seemingly contradicted that account, showing her driving away from the officer. The killing triggered widespread protests across the United States and has destabilized the Minneapolis community, which remains on edge one week later as the Trump administration's massive immigration enforcement operation continues with approximately 3,000 officers deployed or deploying in Minnesota.
• ICE agent fatally shoots Renee Good in Minneapolis during enforcement operation — An Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Good in her vehicle on January 7, 2026, in Minneapolis. According to 911 callers and eyewitnesses, Good was shot multiple times through her windshield while in her car; the officer claimed self-defense, alleging she attempted to run him over. Video footage and witness accounts dispute this claim, showing her vehicle turning away as shots were fired. Paramedics arrived within minutes and performed resuscitation efforts, but Good was pronounced dead at the hospital at 10:30 a.m.
• ICE agent fatally shoots Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis, sparking mass protests and "Abolish ICE" movement — On 7 January 2026, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother of three and US citizen, in Minneapolis. The shooting triggered mass protests across the country, with thousands marching under the banner "Abolish ICE." The incident occurred amid a broader crisis: ICE custody deaths reached 32 in 2025 (the deadliest year in two decades), and worksite raids in Los Angeles, Portland, and Chicago resulted in thousands of arrests without due process. Democratic Representative Shri Thanedar announced plans to introduce the "Abolish ICE Act" to dismantle the agency. A new Economist/YouGov poll shows majority support for eliminating ICE for the first time.
• ICE agent fatally shoots unarmed civilian in Minneapolis — Jonathan Ross, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent, shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, an unarmed US citizen, in Minneapolis. Video evidence shows Good attempting to steer her vehicle away from Ross when she was shot three times in the face. Trump administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, subsequently portrayed Good without evidence as a "domestic terrorist" and "paid agitator," while claiming Ross acted in self-defense.
• ICE agent Jonathan E Ross fatally shoots Renee Nicole Good during Minneapolis immigration enforcement action — On January 7, 2026, ICE special response team member Jonathan E Ross shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, an American mother of three, during an immigration enforcement sweep in Minneapolis. Good was in her vehicle with her wife Rebecca when approached by ICE agents. Body camera footage shows Good saying she was "fine" and "not mad" before the shooting. DHS claimed Good "weaponized her vehicle" to harm officers; the video shows her car moving slowly and briefly brushing an agent. Ross, a 10-year ICE veteran previously dragged by a vehicle in June 2026, fired without warning. The White House and Vice President Vance subsequently shared the footage to justify the shooting.
• ICE agent kills Renee Good in Minneapolis — An ICE agent fatally shot Renee Good, a community member documenting immigration enforcement operations in Minneapolis, on January 7, 2026. Good was engaged in lawful observation of ICE activities. The shooting occurred amid escalating tensions between federal agents and community observers. DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin characterized the incident as a consequence of obstruction, while a federal judge later ruled that agents cannot retaliate against peaceful protesters or stop drivers not forcibly obstructing officers.
• ICE agent shoots and kills Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis — A federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Video of the incident went viral on social media. The shooting triggered immediate media response from local, national, and international news organizations, as well as protests and clashes between police and demonstrators. A second shooting occurred on January 8, and subsequent ICE enforcement actions have continued to draw coverage and counter-protests.
• Private autopsy confirms Renee Good shot three times by ICE officer in Minneapolis — A private autopsy commissioned by lawyers for Renee Good's family determined that the 37-year-old unarmed US citizen was shot three times by a federal immigration officer in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026—in her left forearm, right breast, and left side of her head near the temple. The findings align with incident reports but contradict the Trump administration's claim that Good was a "domestic terrorist" who aimed her car at the officer. The death has sparked tensions between federal authorities and Minnesota state officials, who say they have been excluded from the FBI inquiry.
• ICE agent Jonathan Ross killed Renee Good in Minnesota — On January 7, 2026, ICE agent Jonathan Ross fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Good during an enforcement action in Minnesota. Vice President J.D. Vance publicly blamed Good for her own death and claimed the officer was justified, occurring before any official investigation was completed. The incident sparked widespread public disapproval, with a New York Times/Siena poll showing 63% of Americans disapprove of how ICE handles its job and 61% believe ICE agents have gone too far.
• ICE agent Jonathan Ross shot and killed Renee Good during immigration enforcement operation — On January 7, 2026, ICE agent Jonathan Ross shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Good during the federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. The Trump administration responded by characterizing Good as a domestic terrorist.
• ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis — A federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good as she drove away from ICE agents on a residential street in Minneapolis, Minnesota on January 7. Good was a legal observer trained to document police conduct. Video evidence shows the agent fired three shots through the vehicle's windshield and driver's side window as the car moved away; the agent made no apparent effort to evade, suggesting he did not perceive imminent danger. Good's vehicle struck another car and a utility pole but did not hit any officers. ICE agents prevented bystanders and a self-identified physician from rendering aid.
• ICE agent Jonathan Ross fatally shot Renee Good in Minneapolis — On January 7, 2026, ICE agent Jonathan Ross fired three shots at Renee Good in Minneapolis, killing her. Video analysis indicates Good's SUV moved toward Ross but he was able to move aside; his second and third shots were fired from the side of the vehicle, where he was not directly threatened. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem characterized Good's actions as "domestic terrorism," and President Trump claimed she "ran over" the officer, but frame-by-frame video analysis contradicts these accounts. The incident occurred during an encounter in which agents attempted to remove Good from her vehicle.
• ICE agent shoots Minneapolis resident Renee Nicole Good during enforcement operation — On January 7, 2026, Minneapolis resident Renee Nicole Good was shot four times by an ICE agent while attempting to drive away from officers and was pronounced dead. The incident occurred during ICE enforcement operations in cities across America. Public polling found that 82% of Americans had seen video of the shooting, with a majority interpreting it as unjustified self-defense.
• ICE agent fatally shoots Renee Good in Minneapolis — On January 7, 2026, a 37-year-old mother named Renee Good was shot and killed by an ICE agent during the "Operation Metro Surge" enforcement action in Minneapolis. Despite this fatal shooting, major Minnesota corporations remained silent on the incident.
• ICE agent fatally shoots U.S. citizen Renee Good in Minneapolis — On January 7, ICE agent Jonathan Ross shot and killed Renee Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and mother, in Minneapolis. Witness videos show Good was turning her steering wheel to avoid Ross when the first shot was fired; subsequent shots occurred while Ross stood to the side of the vehicle. Good was driving home after dropping her 6-year-old son at school and had no criminal record beyond a speeding ticket. She was affiliated with ICE Watch, a legal citizen coalition that alerts neighbors to ICE activity.
• Fatal shooting of Renee Good by ICE agent in Minnesota — An armed ICE agent shot and killed Renee Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, on January 7, 2026, as she attempted to drive away from ICE agents in Minnesota. The Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem subsequently labeled Good a terrorist. The incident occurred during the Trump administration's intensified immigration enforcement operations in the state.
• Fatal shootings of unarmed protesters by ICE and CBP officers in Minneapolis — Two unarmed protesters were fatally shot during anti-immigration enforcement operations in Minneapolis: Renee Good, a US citizen, shot by an ICE agent on January 7, 2026, and Alex Pretti shot by CBP officers on January 24, 2026. Both deaths occurred during protests against Trump administration immigration enforcement operations, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem subsequently labeled both victims "domestic terrorists" without evidence.
• ICE agent fatally shoots Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis — A federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, 37, in Minneapolis on Wednesday during an encounter on a snowy street. Good, a poet and mother of three with no criminal record, was driving home with her partner after dropping off her youngest son at school when she encountered ICE agents. The Trump administration characterized her as a "domestic terrorist." Her ex-husband stated she was not an activist and had not participated in protests. A vigil and protest were held in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026.
• ICE agent fatally shoots US citizen Renee Nicole Good during Minneapolis immigration enforcement operation — An ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old US citizen, on Wednesday morning at 34th Street and Portland Avenue in Minneapolis during an immigration enforcement operation. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem claimed Good was "harassing and impeding law enforcement," but video evidence suggests she was driving away when shot. The incident occurred amid a federal surge of 2,000 additional ICE agents deployed to Minneapolis in early December, targeting the city's immigrant communities. Hundreds gathered at the scene in protest; ICE agents later deployed pepper spray and pepper balls against observers.
• ICE agent fatally shoots US citizen Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis — An ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, a US citizen, during an immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis on Wednesday, January 8. Community members recorded the shooting; footage spread rapidly online. By evening, thousands gathered at the shooting site. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey demanded ICE leave the city. Some Democratic lawmakers threatened to withhold Department of Homeland Security funding. The incident triggered nationwide protests.
• ICE agent fatally shoots woman during Minneapolis immigration enforcement operation — A federal ICE agent shot and killed a 37-year-old woman during a large-scale immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis on Wednesday, the second day of a 30-day surge ICE described as its largest operation to date. The shooting sparked immediate community protest, with Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey publicly demanding ICE leave the city, stating the agency was terrorizing residents and families. The FBI and Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension jointly launched an investigation into the shooting.
• ICE agent fatally shoots woman during Minneapolis immigration enforcement raid — Federal ICE agents conducted a large-scale immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis on January 8, 2026. During the operation, an ICE agent shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Macklin Good, a U.S. citizen and mother of three, multiple times in the face as she sat in her vehicle. Video evidence contradicts DHS claims of self-defense, showing the vehicle backing away from agents. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz rejected official narratives, with Frey demanding ICE leave the city and Walz announcing a state investigation.
• ICE agent Jonathan E Ross fatally shoots Renee Nicole Good during Minneapolis immigration enforcement operation — A federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot and killed a 37-year-old woman during an immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis on Wednesday. The Department of Homeland Security claimed the officer fired in self-defense after the woman attempted to run over officers with her vehicle. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Governor Tim Walz rejected this account after viewing video evidence, calling the shooting reckless and unjustified. Walz activated the state emergency operations center and issued a warning order to prepare the Minnesota National Guard.
• ICE agent shoots and kills Minneapolis resident; Trump administration launches coordinated disinformation campaign — ICE agent Jonathan E Ross, a 10-year veteran of the special response team, fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good during an immigration enforcement sweep in Minneapolis on January 8, 2026. Video evidence shows Good attempting to leave the scene in her vehicle when Ross fired three shots at her. The shooting sparked immediate protests and political fallout, with Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey demanding ICE leave the city. Federal officials initially refused to identify the officer; the FBI also declined to involve Minnesota law enforcement in the investigation, prompting Governor Tim Walz to express concerns about fairness.
• ICE killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis — An ICE agent fatally shot Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and poet, during a Minneapolis raid on January 8, 2026. Within hours, the Trump administration—including President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem—issued a coordinated series of false and misleading statements characterizing Good as a "domestic terrorist" and "violent rioter" who attempted to run over the officer. Video evidence contradicts these claims. Democratic officials, including Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, publicly denounced the falsehoods as "verifiably false" and "bullshit."
• ICE officer fatally shoots Renee Good in Minneapolis — An ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good on the edge of Minneapolis's south district on Wednesday, January 8, 2026. The shooting occurred during an immigration enforcement operation in a predominantly Latino neighborhood. Video evidence shows Good said "I'm not mad at you" before being shot. The Trump administration's FBI took over the investigation, while state and local authorities requested access to case files. The incident triggered community mobilization, business closures due to fear, and calls from city officials for ICE to leave Minneapolis.
• ICE officer fatally shoots Renee Nicole Good during traffic stop in Minnesota — Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents fatally shot Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on Wednesday, January 8, 2026. The killing triggered nationwide protests across all 50 states, with organizers calling for ICE to leave U.S. communities and condemning the Trump administration's actions in Venezuela. Thousands marched in major cities; tensions escalated as vehicles believed operated by ICE agents struck protesters in Hartford, Connecticut, and arrests occurred in multiple cities.
• ICE officer shoots and kills Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis — An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer fatally shot Renee Good, a 37-year-old American citizen and mother of three, on Wednesday while she was driving away in her car in Minneapolis. The shooting was captured on video from multiple angles. Trump administration officials accused Good without evidence of being a "domestic terrorist" and falsely claimed the ICE agent was "run over," contradicting video evidence. The shooting sparked widespread protests across major US cities.
• ICE officer shoots and kills US citizen Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis — On Wednesday, January 8, ICE agents conducted a traffic stop on 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in Minnesota. When ordered out of her vehicle, Good attempted to drive away. ICE agents tried to open her car door while she was unarmed and speaking calmly to officers. An ICE officer fired, fatally shooting Good. The White House subsequently characterized her as a domestic terrorist. The shooting triggered widespread protests and calls for independent investigation into the fatal use of force.
• ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis during immigration surge operation — An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old US citizen, in Minneapolis during an enforcement operation. Video evidence shows Good reversing her car and attempting to drive away when the agent fired multiple shots. The Trump administration claimed the officer acted in self-defense. The shooting sparked immediate Democratic demands for accountability and threats to withhold DHS funding unless the agency is restrained.
• — ICE officer Jonathan Ross fatally shot Renee Nicole Good in her car during a federal immigration enforcement action in Minneapolis. The shooting occurred amid a large-scale ICE operation in the city. Good's death prompted immediate vigils, peaceful protests across multiple cities, and accusations from federal officials that Good engaged in "domestic terrorism" without evidence or completed investigation.
• — On Thursday, January 9, 2026, an ICE agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old woman and mother of three, during a federal immigration surge operation in Minneapolis. The Department of Homeland Security immediately declared the shooting self-defense and labeled Good a "domestic terrorist" before public release of evidence. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and Governor Tim Walz disputed the federal account; Reuters video review indicated Good's vehicle maneuvered away from agents before shots were fired. Local officials called for full release of bodycam and surveillance footage.

Supporting reports

• Defense Department escalates review of Senator Mark Kelly — The Defense Department said it was "escalating" its review into Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) to "an official Command investigation" probing his role in a recent viral video with other Democratic lawmakers calling on members of the military to refuse illegal orders. Kelly's lawyers said "there is no legitimate basis for any type of proceeding" against Kelly and that "any such effort would be unconstitutional and an extraordinary abuse of power."
• Senator Mark Kelly and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth engaged in heated argument during classified briefing — During a classified briefing on boat strikes, Senator Mark Kelly (D-AZ) asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about operations. Hegseth responded by referencing lawful versus unlawful orders and went after Kelly regarding a video Kelly participated in with other Democrats telling service members to disobey "illegal orders." Kelly interrupted Hegseth, noting his question had nothing to do with that topic. The Pentagon is escalating a preliminary review into Kelly over his participation in the video to an "official Command Investigation" for "serious allegations of misconduct."
• Senator Mark Kelly stated he is under investigation for repeating constitutional duty taught to service members — Senator Mark Kelly issued a statement saying that President Trump called for his execution, Defense Secretary Hegseth threatened him with court martial, and now the Pentagon is investigating him for "serious allegations of misconduct" related to a video where he repeated something "every service member is taught" about following constitutional orders. Kelly characterized the investigation as retaliation for his protected speech and service.

Supporting reports

• Senate Democrats sent letter on Pentagon investigation of Senator Kelly — On December 9, Senate Democrats on the Armed Services Committee sent a letter to Navy Secretary John Phelan calling the Pentagon's investigation into Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) over a viral video where he and other Democratic lawmakers urged military members to refuse illegal orders "an outright, brazen abuse of power," and added that the review "amount[s] to a purely political exercise seeking to threaten legitimate and lawful actions…and politicize our military justice system."

Supporting reports

• Trump administration invoked sedition law against six Democratic lawmakers for reminding troops of duty to refuse illegal orders. — Trump posted on Truth Social attacking six Democratic lawmakers (Senators Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin; Representatives Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, Chrissy Houlahan) who had released a 90-second video stating "You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders." Trump called them traitors and claimed they committed "seditious behavior, punishable by death." The administration and allies then cited 18 U.S.C. § 2387, a federal sedition statute, as the legal basis for the attack. Legal experts widely agree the lawmakers' statement reinforces military discipline rather than undermining it, as the law requires.
• Trump threatened sedition charges against Democratic lawmakers — Trump threatened six Democratic lawmakers with sedition charges after they publicly urged military personnel to refuse illegal orders. The lawmakers had warned troops in response to allegations that Defense Secretary Hegseth ordered the killing of shipwrecked survivors in a Caribbean military operation.

Supporting reports

• Pentagon launches investigation into Senator Mark Kelly — The Pentagon launched an investigation into Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) for "serious allegations of misconduct" in response to a viral video in which Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers urged military members to refuse illegal orders. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called the video "despicable, reckless and false." Kelly responded that intimidation would not silence him.
• FBI Counterterrorism Division opened investigation into six lawmakers — By November 25, 2025, the FBI's Counterterrorism Division notified Congress it was opening an inquiry into the six veteran lawmakers and requested interviews with all six members. The investigation was triggered by their one-minute video reminding service members of their legal obligation to refuse illegal orders—a principle codified in U.S. military law since 1950 and rooted in post-World War II Nuremberg principles. Legal experts confirmed the lawmakers were simply restating existing law and that their statement does not constitute sedition.
• Pentagon announced investigation of Senator Kelly and signaled possible recall to active duty — The Pentagon announced it is investigating Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain, and signaled it could recall him to active duty for possible court-martial over his participation in the video reminding troops of their legal obligation to refuse illegal orders. The threatened recall and court-martial of a sitting U.S. senator for restating military law represents an extraordinary use of military authority against a member of Congress.
• FBI contacts House and Senate regarding Democratic lawmakers' anti-Trump military video — The FBI contacted the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms requesting interviews with several Democratic members of Congress—Reps. Jason Crow, Maggie Goodlander, Chris Deluzio, and Chrissy Houlahan, plus Sen. Elissa Slotkin—after they filmed a video urging military troops not to follow illegal orders. The lawmakers characterized the FBI outreach as intimidation and harassment, with Sen. Slotkin stating that the President is "weaponizing the federal government against his perceived enemies."
• FBI counterterrorism division investigates Democratic lawmakers — The FBI's counterterrorism division launched an investigation into six Democratic lawmakers who appeared in a viral video calling on military members to refuse illegal orders. Four House members stated that the FBI contacted the House and Senate sergeant at arms to set up interviews. They accused Trump of "using the FBI as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress."
• Far-right figures call for investigation and deportation of Arab-Americans — In the days following the November 18 rally, far-right figures including Tommy Robinson, Wall Street Apes, and Sidney Powell used the Dearborn incident to call on the Department of Justice to investigate and deport Arab-Americans. These calls amplified the rally's narrative of victimhood and framed an entire ethnic group as a threat requiring federal action.
• FBI contacts Capitol Police to schedule interviews with six Democratic senators — Fox News reported that the FBI contacted US Capitol Police to schedule interviews with the six Democratic senators who released the video advising military personnel to refuse illegal orders. The interviews appear to be part of the broader investigation into the lawmakers' statements.
• Pentagon launches investigation into Senator Mark Kelly for video advising troops to refuse illegal orders — The Pentagon announced an investigation into Senator Mark Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers after they released a video advising military service members that they can refuse illegal orders and warning of "threats to our constitution" from within the administration. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called the video "despicable, reckless, and false." Trump characterized the senators' statement as "seditious behaviour" punishable by death. The Pentagon warned it could recall Kelly to active duty for court-martial under a federal law prohibiting military retirees from interfering with military discipline.

Supporting reports

• Vice President Vance claimed congressional reminders of Constitution are illegal — Vice President JD Vance stated that if the president has not issued illegal orders, then members of Congress telling the military to defy the president is by definition illegal. This statement contradicts the constitutional duty of military personnel to refuse unlawful orders and the right of Congress to remind them of that duty.

Supporting reports

• Rep. Jason Crow detailed Trump's threats to use military unlawfully — Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) appeared on CBS and detailed Trump's threats to use the military in unlawful ways, including sending troops into Chicago, into polling stations, killing terrorists' families, and shooting peaceful protesters. Crow stated that Trump cannot tolerate members of Congress reminding service members of their constitutional duty to obey the law and resorts to threats of violence and arrest.
• Pentagon announces investigation of Senator Mark Kelly for video calling troops to refuse illegal orders — The Pentagon announced an investigation into Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain, after he participated in a video with other Democratic lawmakers calling on US troops to refuse unlawful orders. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated the video was "despicable" and that Kelly's conduct undermines military discipline. The Pentagon cited federal law allowing recall of retired service members to active duty for possible court-martial. Kelly responded that the investigation was meant to intimidate Congress and vowed not to be silenced.
• Defense Department announced investigation of Senator Kelly for alleged misconduct and threatened recall to active duty — The Defense Department posted on social media that it was investigating Senator Mark Kelly following "serious allegations of misconduct" and suggested that Kelly could be recalled to active duty "for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures." This announcement came after Kelly participated in a November 18 video with five other Democratic veterans in Congress warning military and intelligence personnel of their legal right and duty to refuse unlawful orders.
• Department of War initiated review of Senator Mark Kelly for potential court-martial — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that the Department of War has initiated a review of retired Navy Captain Mark Kelly (D-AZ) for potential recall to active duty and court-martial proceedings. The review stems from a video Kelly made with five other Democratic lawmakers informing service members of their constitutional duty to refuse unlawful orders. The DOD statement cited 10 U.S.C. § 688 and 18 U.S.C. § 2387, which prohibits actions intended to interfere with military loyalty, morale, and discipline. Hegseth characterized the video as "despicable" and "seditious."
• Trump posted threats against Senator Mark Kelly — President Trump posted on social media that Senator Mark Kelly should be "arrested, hanged, and put to death" in response to Kelly's video encouraging service members to follow the Constitution and refuse unlawful orders. Kelly responded by reaffirming his oath to the Constitution and stating that Trump's threats would not intimidate him or other members of Congress from holding the administration accountable.
• Pete Hegseth orders Navy investigation into Mark Kelly's video comments — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memorandum to Navy Secretary John Phelan on Tuesday ordering an investigation into "potentially unlawful comments" made by Senator Mark Kelly and fellow Democrats in a social media video encouraging military personnel to refuse unlawful orders. The Pentagon had already announced an investigation on Monday. Hegseth requested a brief by December 10. The group faces FBI counter-terrorism inquiry and potential court-martial proceedings.
• Defense Secretary Hegseth directs Navy review of Senator Kelly — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared a memo directing the Navy secretary to review Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) for "potentially unlawful conduct" related to the viral video where Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers urged military members to resist illegal orders. The memo requested the Navy review be completed and briefed to Hegseth by December 10.
• Defense Secretary threatens Senator with court martial over military dissent video — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened Senator Mark Kelly with court martial after Kelly recorded a video with five Democratic lawmakers warning military members to question unlawful orders, apparently in reference to the Caribbean boat strikes. The threat represents potential retaliation against a senator for encouraging military personnel to uphold constitutional obligations.
• Secretary of Defense Hegseth threatens court martial of Senator Mark Kelly — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth threatened to court martial Senator Mark Kelly in response to Kelly's video urging military personnel to follow the law and refuse illegal orders. Hegseth called the video "sedition" and made deranged social media posts attacking Kelly's uniform and medals, later claiming Kelly's image was reversed by his phone. Kelly responded that the threat was about intimidation and the media cycle, not law, and refused to be silenced.
• Trump threatened to court-martial Senator Mark Kelly over military discipline video — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth threatened to court-martial Senator Mark Kelly after Kelly released a video with five other Democratic lawmakers urging military members not to follow illegal orders. The video was released in response to the alleged illegal directives issued by Hegseth regarding lethal operations.

Supporting reports

• Trump accuses Democratic lawmakers of sedition on Truth Social — Trump posted on Truth Social targeting six Democratic lawmakers who published a video urging military members to refuse illegal orders. Trump accused them of sedition "AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL" and stated they "SHOULD BE IN JAIL RIGHT NOW." He later shared a post calling them "traitorous sons of bitches" who should be "impeached and prosecuted."
• Trump demands arrest and execution of Democratic lawmakers for sedition — On Thursday, President Trump posted on social media that the Democratic lawmakers' video constituted "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL" and demanded each lawmaker be "ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL." In a follow-up post, he stated the behavior was "punishable by DEATH." Trump continued attacking the lawmakers over the following two days. The posts represent a sitting president calling for the arrest and capital punishment of elected members of Congress for speech he perceives as threatening to his policies.
• Trump invoked stolen 2020 election claim and labeled critics "traitors" — Trump reiterated the false claim that the 2020 election was "stolen" and attacked Democratic lawmakers, veterans, and former intelligence officials who reminded U.S. troops they cannot obey unlawful orders, calling these Americans "traitors." Trump's team reposted comments suggesting George Washington would have hanged such individuals.
• Trump posted calls for execution of Democrats for treason — Trump posted on social media that Democrats who told the military to disobey his orders should be executed for sedition, calling it "a major crime" and "sedition at the highest level." He made two additional posts at midnight Saturday repeating the accusation and claiming "many great legal scholars" agreed the Democrats had committed serious crimes.
• Trump accuses Kelly and other Democrats of sedition punishable by death — President Trump posted on Truth Social that Senator Kelly and other Democrats who participated in the video had engaged in "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH" and reposted another user's message saying "HANG THEM." Kelly subsequently stated that Trump's language made him fear for his family's safety, particularly given his wife Gabrielle Giffords' prior assassination attempt in 2011.
• Trump Posts Calls for Senator Kelly's Arrest and Execution — President Trump posted on social media calling for Senator Mark Kelly's arrest, hanging, and execution in response to Kelly's participation in a video reminding servicemembers of their duty to refuse unlawful orders. The posts were part of the administration's escalating rhetoric against lawmakers who have questioned the legality of military operations, including deadly strikes on civilians in small boats near Venezuela.
• Trump calls for execution of Senator Kelly for advising troops on illegal orders — President Trump posted on social media that Senator Mark Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers "should be in jail right now" and characterized their video advising military personnel to refuse illegal orders as "seditious behaviour at the highest level, punishable by DEATH." Trump also republished a post containing the phrase "hang them." Kelly responded that Trump's threats were intended to intimidate Congress from holding the administration accountable.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge blocks national guard deployment to Portland — US District Judge Karin Immergut issued a restraining order on Saturday blocking the Trump administration from deploying federalized national guard troops to Portland, Oregon. The judge, nominated by Trump, agreed with Oregon's assertion that deploying national guard troops would likely inflame rather than calm protests, similar to effects observed in 2020.
• Judge Immergut blocks Oregon National Guard deployment — U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut issued a ruling blocking the deployment of federalized Oregon National Guard troops to Portland. She declared that "the President's determination" that law enforcement could not execute the laws of the United States "was simply untethered to the facts." Immergut wrote that the nation is "a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law" and warned that the administration's arguments "risk blurring the line between civil and military federal power—to the detriment of this nation."
• Temporary restraining order ruling — Oregon v. Trump (D. Or.) 3:25-cv-01756 — District Court Judge Karin J. Immergut granted a temporary restraining order blocking the Sept. 28 memorandum ordering the federalization and deployment of Oregon National Guard service members to Portland. In granting the TRO, the court found that the administration likely exceeded its authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406 and violated the Tenth Amendment. On Oct. 5, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint adding the State of California and moved for a second temporary restraining order after the administration ordered the deployment of the California National Guard to Oregon under the same authority, seeking to circumvent the initial order. Judge Immergut quickly granted the second TRO, extending her order to prohibit the deployment of any federalized members of the National Guard in Oregon, regardless of their state origin. The administration has announced it intends to appeal both decisions.
• Federal judge temporarily blocked National Guard deployment to Oregon — Federal Judge Karin Immergut temporarily blocked the Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops to Oregon, writing that the president and his officials "have made a range of arguments that, if accepted, risk blurring the line between civil and military federal power—to the detriment of this nation." In response, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller tweeted that the decision amounted to "legal insurrection" and claimed that the refusal of Portland and Oregon law enforcement to cooperate with ICE officials is "an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers."
• Federal judge blocks Trump administration national guard deployment to Portland — US District Judge Karin Immergut issued a restraining order blocking the Trump administration from deploying 200 federalized Oregon National Guard members to Portland. Trump had announced the deployment on September 27, citing unrest at an ICE office. Oregon's attorney general filed suit, arguing the deployment would violate the Constitution and federal law prohibiting military enforcement of domestic law. The judge agreed the deployment would likely inflame rather than calm protests, contradicting the administration's characterization of Portland as a war zone when recent protests had been "sedate" with fewer than a dozen participants.
• Judge Immergut issues emergency order blocking federalized National Guard deployment — Both California and Oregon requested that Judge Immergut stop the Trump administration from circumventing her initial ruling by deploying California National Guard troops to Oregon. On Sunday evening, Judge Immergut held an emergency hearing on the deployment and issued an order forbidding the deployment of any federalized National Guard troops from any state to Oregon for 14 days.
• Federal judge blocked military deployment to Portland — U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut ruled that the Trump administration failed to satisfy legal requirements to deploy troops to Portland, Oregon. The judge wrote that the order was necessary to preserve America's "longstanding and foundational tradition of resistance to government overreach, especially in the form of military intrusion into civil affairs." The judge found the President's determination "simply untethered to the facts" and "not conceived in good faith," noting the administration risked blurring the line between civil and military federal power.
• Judge Immergut broadened order blocking National Guard deployments nationwide — Judge Immergut broadened her order to block the Trump administration from sending National Guard troops from any state or DC to Oregon, and told Justice Department lawyers that Trump's effort to do so was "in direct contravention" of her decision. The ruling came after Trump tried to send hundreds of California National Guard troops to Oregon, and another 400 members of the Texas National Guard to cities including Portland and Chicago.
• Federal judge blocks Trump administration deployment of national guard to Oregon — US District Judge Karin Immergut issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration from deploying federalized California national guard troops to Portland, Oregon. The order, effective until at least October 19, came hours after California Governor Gavin Newsom announced he would sue President Trump over the planned deployment. The judge found no evidence that recent protests necessitated the deployment and questioned how federalizing out-of-state guard units would not violate her prior day's order blocking Oregon's own guard deployment to Portland.
• — The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted an administrative stay of District Court Judge Karin J. Immergut's Oct. 4 Temporary Restraining Order blocking the Sept. 28 memorandum authorizing the federalization of the Oregon National Guard. Because the Oregon National Guard had already been federalized, the court said, the “administrative stay will best preserve the status quo” while the appeal is pending. Today's order does not address the underlying merits or Judge Immergut's further Oct. 5 order , which prevents the deployment of out-of-state National Guard troops to Oregon.

Supporting reports

• Trump warns military leaders of "enemy within" and suggests using Democratic cities as training grounds — On September 30, 2025, President Trump addressed hundreds of top military officials and warned darkly about the need to counter "the enemy within," declaring that "America is under invasion from within" and that "Democrats run most of the cities that are in bad shape." Trump suggested the military could be useful in his drive against crime in Democratic cities and could use these cities as military "training grounds," raising concerns about violations of the Posse Comitatus Act.
• Trump addressed military commanders on deploying troops in U.S. cities — President Trump spoke to assembled military commanders at Quantico, framing domestic civil unrest as an "invasion from within" equivalent to foreign military threats. He stated he had signed an executive order establishing a quick reaction force for quelling civil disturbances and indicated that deploying combat troops to major U.S. cities including San Francisco, Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles would be "a major part" of military operations. He referenced the constitutional oath to defend against "all enemies foreign and domestic" and characterized inner cities as a "war" requiring military intervention.
• Trump told military leaders to confront "enemy from within" — Speaking to hundreds of senior US military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, President Trump warned of an unspecified "enemy from within," stating "We're under invasion from within, no different than a foreign enemy, but more difficult in many ways, because they don't wear uniforms." He also suggested that cities like San Francisco, Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles could be used "as training grounds for our military," language echoing authoritarian rhetoric about internal enemies and military deployment against civilian populations.
• Trump deploys National Guard troops to Chicago in October — In October, President Trump deployed National Guard troops to Chicago, continuing the pattern of using military forces for domestic law enforcement and immigration enforcement purposes.

Supporting reports

• Trump posts directive to deploy troops to Portland — On September 27, Trump's social media account posted a directive to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to deploy troops to Portland, Oregon, to protect ICE facilities from what Trump characterized as attacks by "Antifa" and "domestic terrorists." Trump authorized "Full Force, if necessary." The post was based on Trump's assertion that Portland was a "war ravaged" city plagued by "anarchists" and "crazy people," claims contradicted by local officials and reporting.
• Trump directed troop deployment to Portland, Oregon — On September 27, Trump announced via Truth Social that he directed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to deploy troops to Portland, Oregon, which he baselessly called "War ravaged" and "under siege" by antifa. Portland Mayor Keith Wilson responded that "the number of necessary troops is zero, in Portland and any other American city." The deployment was presented without evidence of the claimed crisis.
• Trump directed military deployment to Portland with authorization for full force — President Trump posted that he was directing Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to provide troops to protect the ICE facility in Portland and "any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists," and authorized "Full Force, if necessary." The order came after Trump claimed the facility was under siege, but Senator Ron Wyden posted a video showing the ICE facility with no people present.
• Trump announced deployment of federal troops to Portland — Trump announced on Truth Social that he is directing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to deploy federal troops to Portland, Oregon at the request of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to protect against what he characterized as attacks by "Antifa" and "domestic terrorists." Trump authorized "full force, if necessary." Oregon Governor Tina Kotek and Portland Mayor Keith Wilson both rejected the deployment, stating there is no insurrection or threat to national security warranting military presence in the city.

Supporting reports

• Trump posts threat to Chicago referencing "Department of War" and deportations — Trump posted on Truth Social that Chicago was about to discover "why it's called the Department of War," referencing a recent executive order renaming the Department of Defense. The post also stated "I love the smell of deportations in the morning," alluding to the film Apocalypse Now. Governor Pritzker responded by stating the president was "threatening to go to war with an American city" and that "This is not a joke. This is not normal." The rhetoric escalates the administration's framing of immigration enforcement as military action against a domestic city.
• Trump posted AI-generated image threatening military action against Chicago — President Trump's social media account posted an AI-generated image depicting him as a Vietnam War character in front of Chicago's skyline with military helicopters and flames, captioned "Chipocalypse Now" with text reading "I love the smell of deportations in the morning… Chicago about to find out why it's called the Department of WAR." The post included helicopter emojis associated with Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet's extrajudicial killings. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker responded by calling the threat abnormal and warning against intimidation.
• Trump shared "Chipocalypse Now" meme threatening deportations and war on Chicago — On Truth Social, Trump posted a meme depicting himself as an officer from "Apocalypse Now" with the caption "I love the smell of deportations in the morning" and "Chicago about to find out why it's called the Department of War." Illinois Governor JB Pritzker responded by calling Trump a "wannabe dictator" and stating he is "threatening to go to war with an American city," characterizing the rhetoric as abnormal and dangerous.
• Trump posted apocalyptic threat against Chicago on Truth Social — Trump posted on Truth Social depicting himself as the character from Apocalypse Now with the caption "I love the smell of deportations in the morning. Chicago about to find out why it's called the Department of WAR." The post threatened military action against a major U.S. city. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, and California Governor Gavin Newsom responded by characterizing the threat as authoritarian and unconstitutional. Senator Tammy Duckworth called it a declaration of war on an American city.

Supporting reports

• California governor files preliminary injunction to block extended national guard deployment — Following Judge Breyer's ruling, California Governor Gavin Newsom filed a preliminary injunction on September 2 seeking to block the Trump administration's extension of national guard troops' deployment in Los Angeles through the November election. Newsom argued there was no justification for continued military presence against communities. Approximately 300 troops remained deployed at the time, down from thousands sent in June.
• Federal judge rules Trump administration illegally deployed national guard in Los Angeles — Judge Charles Breyer of the U.S. District Court ruled that the Trump administration violated the Posse Comitatus Act (1878) by deploying thousands of national guard troops to accompany federal immigration agents on raids in Los Angeles in June 2025. The ruling, effective September 12, barred troops from conducting arrests, searches, crowd control, and other law-enforcement functions. California Governor Gavin Newsom had filed suit in June, arguing the deployment constituted militarization of domestic streets. The Trump administration vowed to appeal.
• Judge Breyer ruled Trump administration's use of military in Los Angeles violated Posse Comitatus Act — Judge Charles Breyer of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that Trump, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and the Department of Defense acted illegally when they deployed the Marines and National Guard in Los Angeles. The judge found that armed soldiers set up protective perimeters, traffic blockages, and engaged in crowd control, directly violating the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the use of U.S. military to execute domestic law. The judge noted that 300 troops remain in Los Angeles and warned that Trump and Hegseth have stated their intention to deploy National Guard troops in other cities, "thus creating a national police force with the President as its chief." Breyer prohibited the defendants from deploying or using military or National Guard troops to execute laws and stayed the order until noon September 12 to allow appeal.
• Federal judge ruled Trump's LA military deployment violated Posse Comitatus Act — A federal judge ruled that Trump's deployment of the military to Los Angeles violated the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the army from performing domestic law enforcement actions without authorization from Congress. While the judge noted that it's legal to deploy the officials to protect federal property, he said that Trump is using the military as a "national police force with the President as its chief."
• Judge Blocks Military Deployment for Law Enforcement in Los Angeles — On September 2, 2025, Judge Charles Breyer issued a ruling that prohibited the Trump administration from using military troops for law enforcement in Los Angeles, citing violations of the Posse Comitatus Act. The judge's order prevents the deployment of National Guard troops for domestic law enforcement activities, emphasizing the need to uphold legal boundaries between military and civilian roles.
• Judge Rules Against Trump's Use of Military for Domestic Law Enforcement — On September 2, 2025, Judge Charles Breyer ruled that President Trump, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and the Department of Defense acted illegally by deploying the Marines and National Guard in Los Angeles to enforce domestic law, violating the Posse Comitatus Act. The judge prohibited the use of military troops for law enforcement activities and warned against creating a national police force under presidential control.
• Judge rules Trump violated federal law in Los Angeles national guard deployment — A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump violated federal law when he deployed thousands of national guard troops to Los Angeles earlier in the summer during protests against ICE operations. The ruling represents a legal challenge to Trump's authority to unilaterally deploy military forces domestically without proper statutory authorization or state consent.
• Federal judge rules Trump's military deployment to Los Angeles unlawful — A federal judge found that Trump illegally deployed thousands of military troops to Los Angeles in June and barred the Pentagon from using National Guard and Marines for police functions such as arrests and crowd control. The order takes effect September 12. The ruling upheld California Governor Gavin Newsom's lawsuit challenging the deployment as a violation of the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits military use in domestic law enforcement.

Supporting reports

• Trump threatens to deploy National Guard to Chicago and Baltimore, claims Chicago is "world's most dangerous city" — Donald Trump announced plans to deploy National Guard units to Chicago and Baltimore to address violent crime, calling Chicago "the most dangerous city in the world" and citing 20 killings over 2.5 weeks and 75 shootings. He also discussed sending troops to New Orleans. The claims are contradicted by FBI crime data showing Chicago ranks 14th among cities over 100,000 residents in homicide rate (17.5 per 100,000), while the four highest-murder-rate cities—Jackson, Birmingham, St. Louis, and Memphis—are all in Republican-led states with rates ranging from 40.6 to 78.7 per 100,000.
• Texas National Guard preparation to deploy to Chicago reported — According to Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, the Texas National Guard is preparing to deploy to Chicago. Texas Governor Greg Abbott denied the claim. The deployment threat occurs despite Chicago experiencing declining violent crime, with 2025 showing fewer shootings than any year since the mid-1960s according to crime data expert Jeff Asher. Five major Texas cities—Houston, Corpus Christi, Lubbock, Dallas, and San Antonio—had higher violent crime rates per 100,000 people than Chicago in 2024.
• Trump pledges military deployment to Chicago and Baltimore amid false crime claims — President Trump pledged on Truth Social to deploy the military to Chicago and Baltimore, characterizing both cities as exceptionally dangerous. Trump called Chicago "the worst and most dangerous city in the World, by far" and a "killing field," and described Baltimore as "so far gone," a "hellhole," and a "horrible deathbed." However, FBI data shows Chicago ranked 55th in violent crime among major U.S. cities in 2024 (540 per 100,000), with multiple red-state cities including Memphis, Kansas City, Tulsa, and Louisville recording significantly higher rates. Baltimore is experiencing a historic crime decline, with August 2025 recording the lowest homicide count for that month on record and 91 homicides through September 1—the fewest in over 50 years for that period.
• Trump threatens national guard deployment to Chicago; advance ICE team training underway — President Trump reaffirmed his commitment to deploying federal troops to Chicago to address crime and homelessness, calling the city a "hellhole" and stating deployment would proceed regardless of local leadership consent. An advance team of at least 30 agents is undergoing crowd control and flash grenade training at Naval Station Great Lakes; 230 Customs and Border Protection agents are being transferred from Los Angeles. Chicago would become the second city to receive national guard troops after Washington DC (August) and Los Angeles (June). Local officials and community groups are organizing resistance, including legal preparation and "know your rights" campaigns.

Supporting reports

• Trump stated no deadline for keeping troops in DC — When asked if there is a limit to how long he will keep troops in the nation's capital, Trump responded: "I don't know if there is a deadline. If I have a national emergency, I can keep the troops there as long as I want. People aren't going to want to have the troops out in 30 days." The statement indicates indefinite military occupation of the capital.
• Trump suggested Gaza-like depopulation of DC — During the same press conference, Trump suggested a potential Gaza-like depopulation strategy for Washington, D.C., stating: "We could take everybody out and you have a great capital" and warning visitors "they're not going to go home in a body bag." The statement implied forced removal of DC residents as a crime-reduction strategy.