Narrow these 3 — tap a value to filter:
Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Aug 20, 2026 DOJ filed court documents defending the prosecution of James Comey over a seashell social media post Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
Federal prosecutors defended charging a former FBI director over ambiguous social media speech, raising concerns about weaponizing criminal law against political critics.
Supporting reports
- DOJ defends prosecution of James Comey over Instagram seashell post — The US Department of Justice filed court documents defending its prosecution of former FBI director James Comey, arguing that his May 2025 Instagram post featuring seashells arranged to read "8647" could reasonably be interpreted as a threat against President Trump. Prosecutors claimed there is "no serious dispute" that the image constituted a coded message meaning "kill" or "get rid of" the president. Comey was indicted in April 2026 on charges of making a threat against the US president and transmitting it across state lines. Comey's legal team argues the post is protected speech and seeks dismissal on grounds of vindictive and selective prosecution.
Aug 18, 2026 DOJ filed an appeal to reinstate previously dismissed charges against Kilmar Ábrego García Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
The administration sought to revive criminal charges a judge had found "vindictive," against a man who had successfully challenged his unlawful deportation, raising rule-of-law concerns.
Supporting reports
- Trump DOJ appeals dismissal of charges against wrongfully deported Kilmar Ábrego García — The Trump administration's Department of Justice filed an appeal with the US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to reinstate criminal human smuggling charges against Kilmar Ábrego García. A federal district judge had dismissed the charges in May, finding the prosecution "vindictive in nature" and tainted by statements from Attorney General Todd Blanche and other DOJ officials. The DOJ argues the charges were based on evidence and law, not retaliation, and claims the judge's dismissal represents an unwarranted intrusion into executive power.
Aug 15, 2026 Todd Blanche declined to pledge DOJ independence from the White House Tier 1 · Primary Power and Authority
The Attorney General refused to commit the Justice Department to independence from presidential direction, weakening the constitutional wall between law enforcement and the executive.
Supporting reports
- Todd Blanche declines to pledge DOJ independence from White House — US Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer, declined on NBC's Meet the Press to pledge that the Department of Justice would act independently of the White House, stating "no attorney general should ever pledge that." Blanche asserted Trump would never ask him to do something unethical or illegal, dismissing concerns about politicization as a "false narrative." His comments came days after his narrow 50-49 Senate confirmation and amid Trump's dismissal of his predecessor Pam Bondi over insufficient action against Trump's political opponents.
- Attorney General Todd Blanche refused to pledge DOJ independence from White House — On NBC's Meet the Press, Attorney General Todd Blanche refused to pledge that the DOJ will always act independently of the White House, stating "No, I'm not going to pledge that, and no AG ever should." When asked if he would comply with a presidential directive that crosses ethical or legal lines, Blanche responded that the president "would never do that" and "never has" and "never will," without committing to refuse unlawful orders.