Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Department of Justice attempts to remove Judge Beryl Howell from case; judge rebukes strategy as attack on judicial integrity — After Judge Beryl Howell issued a decision in March temporarily blocking Trump from penalizing the law firm Perkins Coie, the Department of Justice, in a rare move, attempted to have Howell removed from the case, alleging bias. Judge Howell issued a blistering response, writing: "This strategy is designed to impugn the integrity of the federal judicial system and blame any loss on the decision-maker rather than fallacies in the substantive legal arguments presented."

Supporting reports

• House Speaker Johnson vows Congress will "act" against judges; judiciary subcommittee explores banning nationwide injunctions — On March 25, House Speaker Mike Johnson vowed that "desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act" regarding judges. A House judiciary subcommittee hearing on April 1 focused on banning nationwide injunctions issued by judges. A House bill to ban such injunctions is expected to pass in coming weeks. Senator Charles Grassley, who leads the Senate judiciary committee and received a donation from Musk, held a similar hearing and introduced a bill to end "universal injunctions," though Senate passage is deemed unlikely.
• House Speaker Mike Johnson floated eliminating federal courts — House Speaker Mike Johnson floated the possibility of eliminating some federal courts, telling reporters that Congress has the authority to "eliminate an entire district court." He later clarified it wasn't meant as a threat, but the statement signals consideration of dismantling the federal judiciary.
• Mike Johnson floats eliminating federal courts as Trump faces judicial pressure — House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested Congress could defund, restructure, or eliminate federal courts to counter judicial decisions blocking Trump administration policies. Speaking to reporters on March 25, Johnson stated Congress has "authority over federal courts" and could "eliminate an entire district court." While Johnson later clarified his remarks illustrated Congress's constitutional powers rather than a direct threat, the statement reflects mounting Republican pressure on judicial independence, particularly targeting judges who issued nationwide injunctions blocking immigration enforcement actions.
• House Republicans advance bill to restrict nationwide injunctions — California Republican Representative Darrell Issa is advancing a bill to be voted on the following week that would limit district court judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions. House Speaker Johnson described the measure as a "dramatic improvement" to the federal court system, arguing such injunctions violate separation of powers. The bill represents an alternative legislative approach to constraining judicial power in response to courts blocking Trump administration policies.
• House Republicans pursue impeachment of federal judges over injunctions — Multiple House Republicans have introduced or are pursuing articles of impeachment against federal judges, including US District Judge James Boasberg, who issued a nationwide injunction preventing deportation of Venezuelan immigrants. Trump called for Boasberg's impeachment, and several House Republicans have taken up the call to impeach judges who issued similar nationwide injunctions blocking Trump administration actions. This represents an escalation in Republican efforts to pressure the judiciary over policy disagreements.
• House Speaker suggests Congress could eliminate federal courts — House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that Republicans in Congress possess the authority to eliminate federal district courts, stating: "We do have the authority over the federal courts, as you know. We can eliminate an entire district court. We have power of funding over the courts and all these other things." The statement represents a direct challenge to judicial independence and the separation of powers.
• Trump administration challenges judges and undermines judicial credibility — The Trump administration has challenged judges who have ruled against Trump and worked to destroy public faith in the courts. The effort represents a systematic campaign to delegitimize judicial authority when it conflicts with administration preferences.

Supporting reports

• Yunseo Chung files lawsuit against Trump administration over green card revocation — Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old Columbia University student and green card holder from South Korea, filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump and high-ranking administration officials on March 24 challenging the revocation of her green card and the targeting of her for deportation. The lawsuit alleges that ICE used immigration enforcement as a tool to suppress her political speech and that of other students engaged in pro-Palestinian activism, in violation of her First Amendment rights and due process protections.
• Yunseo Chung filed lawsuit after immigration arrest attempt — Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old Columbia University student who has lived in the US since age 7, filed a lawsuit against Trump and other administration officials after immigration agents attempted to arrest and deport her for apparently participating in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. A federal judge later temporarily blocked the Trump administration from detaining Chung.
• State Department orders revocation of green card for Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil — Immigration officials arrested Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and leader of pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, acting on an order from the State Department to revoke his green card. Khalil remains in custody in Louisiana. Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly stated the government would "kick out" green card holders who participate in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, signaling a coordinated policy to strip legal status from protesters based on their political speech.
• Trump administration initiates deportation proceedings against Columbia student protester Yunseo Chung — Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old permanent resident who participated in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, filed a lawsuit on March 24, 2025, against the Trump administration after immigration authorities began deportation efforts against her. Three days after her arrest by New York police during campus demonstrations, ICE signed an administrative arrest warrant. The lawsuit names Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other officials, alleging the government is retaliating against her for constitutionally protected protest activity and seeking to revoke her permanent resident status without justification.
• Yunseo Chung, green card holder, sues after ICE attempts arrest and revokes green card — Yunseo Chung, a green card holder who has lived in the United States since age seven and attended pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University, sued the Trump administration on Monday, March 24, 2025, after immigration officials attempted to arrest her. ICE officials informed her lawyer that her green card had been revoked. The case exemplifies the administration's targeting of noncitizen students engaged in political protest and speech critical of Israel's military actions in Gaza.
• Federal judge blocks detention of Columbia protester facing deportation — U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald issued a temporary restraining order preventing Immigration and Customs Enforcement from detaining or transferring Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old green card holder and Columbia University student, out of New York's southern district. Chung, arrested during a Gaza solidarity protest at Barnard College, sued the Trump administration alleging it is using immigration enforcement to suppress her protected speech. The judge found the government had not presented sufficient factual basis for its deportation claims against the legal permanent resident, who has lived in the U.S. since age seven.
• Federal judge halts deportation proceedings against Columbia student Yunseo Chung — Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old Columbia University student and green card holder, sued the Trump administration after ICE revoked her green card and sought her arrest following her attendance at a pro-Palestinian sit-in protest at Barnard College on March 9. ICE obtained a warrant citing a law against "harboring noncitizens" and accused her of posing a threat to U.S. foreign policy interests. On March 25, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order halting arrest and deportation efforts, finding no evidence she posed a danger to the community.
• Federal judge blocks ICE detention of Columbia undergraduate Yunseo Chung — A US judge in Manhattan issued an order blocking immigration officials from detaining Yunseo Chung, a Columbia University undergraduate and permanent resident (green card holder), who faced deportation threats for involvement in Gaza solidarity protests. The judicial intervention prevented the detention from proceeding.
• Federal judge blocks deportation of Tufts student detained by ICE; visa revocation challenged — Rümeysa Öztürk, a 30-year-old Fulbright scholar and doctoral student at Tufts University, was detained by masked plainclothes ICE officers on Tuesday in a Boston suburb. The Department of Homeland Security terminated her visa, alleging support for Hamas without evidence. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Denise Casper issued an order prohibiting Öztürk's removal from the United States pending further court proceedings. Her attorneys, including ACLU lawyers, argue the detention is retaliation for an opinion piece she co-authored advocating Palestinian rights and university divestment from Israel-linked companies.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge orders reinstatement of fired probationary staff — A federal judge in California, William H. Alsup, issued a preliminary injunction to reinstate thousands of probationary federal employees who were fired from six federal agencies. The ruling is part of a lawsuit filed by the American Federation of Government Employees. The judge criticized the Trump administration's justification for the firings, stating that claims of poor performance were false. The order affects employees from the Departments of Defense, Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Energy, Interior, and Treasury. The judge also restricted the Office of Personnel Management from advising agencies on terminations.
• Judge orders Musk to comply with lawsuit — U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan ordered Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency to turn over their records and answer questions in response to a lawsuit filed by 14 attorneys general from Democratic-dominated states. They are required to comply within three weeks.
• Judge orders rehiring of federal employees — Judge William Alsup ordered the Trump administration to immediately rehire tens of thousands of federal employees from various departments who were terminated due to Elon Musk's DOGE cuts. The judge criticized the administration for allegedly firing employees under false pretenses of performance issues, calling it a lie and expressing frustration over the lack of transparency in the process.
• Federal judge reinstates fired probationary workers — On March 13, 2025, a federal judge in California granted a preliminary injunction to reinstate thousands of fired probationary workers at federal agencies. This decision was part of a lawsuit filed by the American Federation of Government Employees. The ruling applies to employees from several departments, including Defense and Veterans Affairs, who were dismissed under claims of poor performance. The judge criticized these claims as false and prohibited the Office of Personnel Management from advising on terminations.
• Federal judges rule against Musk's firings — Two federal judges issued rulings against Elon Musk's "department of government efficiency" (Doge) regarding the firing of probationary employees. Judge William H. Alsup in California ruled that fired employees must be offered their jobs back, criticizing the process as a "sham." In Maryland, Judge James Bredar issued a temporary restraining order blocking further firings at 18 federal agencies. These rulings challenge Musk's cost-cutting measures, which have faced public disapproval and legal scrutiny.
• Judge orders reinstatement of federal workers — U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that federal agencies must immediately offer jobs back to thousands of probationary workers who were purged from the government early in President Trump's administration. The judge stated that the mass firings did not follow legal protocols. Additionally, Judge James Bredar ordered the reinstatement of these workers across multiple federal departments, indicating that the government likely engaged in an illegal scheme regarding the firings.
• Judge rules against mass firings — U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that the mass firings of probationary workers from various federal departments did not comply with legal requirements. The judge expressed skepticism about the government's claims regarding the firings and criticized the lack of transparency in the process.

Supporting reports

• District Judge Howell blocks enforcement of Trump executive order against Perkins Coie — On 12 March, federal District Judge Beryl Howell issued a ruling blocking the Trump administration from enforcing key parts of its executive order against law firm Perkins Coie. The judge stated the order "runs head-on into the wall of first amendment protections," finding that the punitive sanctions violated constitutional protections for attorneys and their clients.
• Judge blocks Trump order against Perkins Coie — A federal judge, Beryl Howell, temporarily blocked a significant portion of an executive order issued by Donald Trump. The order targeted the law firm Perkins Coie, which had ties to Hillary Clinton, by stripping its lawyers of security clearances and barring federal engagement with them. Howell ruled that Trump's use of national security as a pretext to punish the firm was unjustified and likened it to a "bill of attainder," which is unconstitutional. The restraining order halts most of the executive order's effects, except for the revocation of clearances.

Supporting reports

• DOJ motion to dismiss Eric Adams indictment — Emil Bove, acting deputy attorney general under Trump, appeared in a Manhattan courtroom to argue for the dismissal of a corruption indictment against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The motion to dismiss was based on the rationale that continuing the prosecution would impede Adams's ability to collaborate with Trump's immigration agenda. The judge, Dale E Ho, questioned the appropriateness of this rationale, which could set a precedent for dismissing cases against other officials to facilitate cooperation with the president's policies. The hearing concluded without a decision, leaving Adams's legal future uncertain.
• Justice Department dismisses case against Eric Adams — Emil Bove, the acting deputy attorney general, led the Justice Department in dismissing a corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams. The decision, aligned with the Trump administration's directive, was justified by Bove as necessary to avoid interfering with Adams' governance and to support federal immigration policies. The dismissal was formalized with signatures from Bove and two trial attorneys. This move reflects a shift in the Justice Department's approach, prioritizing political agendas over prosecutorial independence, and has led to multiple resignations within the department.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department dropped charges against Eric Adams — The U.S. Department of Justice requested the dropping of corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams, which included conspiracy, wire fraud, and soliciting illegal foreign campaign contributions. This decision led to the resignation of seven prosecutors who were involved in the case, as they refused to comply with the directive. The charges were widely perceived as being dropped in exchange for Adams' cooperation with the Trump administration's immigration policies.
• DOJ drops bribery case against Eric Adams — The U.S. Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, has ordered the dismissal of bribery charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. This decision has sparked controversy and concern over potential political motivations, as Adams has been seen as aligning with Trump. The move has led to resignations within the Justice Department, including the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Danielle Sassoon, who accused the DOJ of political interference. The decision has raised questions about the integrity of the judicial process and the rule of law.
• DOJ motion to dismiss Eric Adams indictment — Emil Bove, acting deputy attorney general under Trump, appeared in a Manhattan courtroom to argue for the dismissal of a corruption indictment against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The motion to dismiss was based on the rationale that continuing the prosecution would impede Adams's ability to collaborate with Trump's immigration agenda. The judge, Dale E Ho, questioned the appropriateness of this rationale, which could set a precedent for dismissing cases against other officials to facilitate cooperation with the president's policies. The hearing concluded without a decision, leaving Adams's legal future uncertain.
• Justice Department dismisses case against Eric Adams — Emil Bove, the acting deputy attorney general, led the Justice Department in dismissing a corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams. The decision, aligned with the Trump administration's directive, was justified by Bove as necessary to avoid interfering with Adams' governance and to support federal immigration policies. The dismissal was formalized with signatures from Bove and two trial attorneys. This move reflects a shift in the Justice Department's approach, prioritizing political agendas over prosecutorial independence, and has led to multiple resignations within the department.

Supporting reports

• Interim US Attorney resigns over corruption case — Danielle Sassoon, the interim US Attorney handling the NYC Mayor Eric Adams' public corruption case, resigned after refusing to drop charges despite pressure from DOJ Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. Sassoon's resignation follows a letter to AG Pam Bondi detailing alleged unethical proposals from Adams' attorneys. Other senior US Attorneys also resigned in protest, highlighting concerns over political interference.
• US Attorney resigns over refusal to drop charges — Danielle Sassoon, the interim US Attorney in charge of the NYC Mayor Eric Adams’ public corruption case, resigned after refusing to drop the charges despite demands from DOJ Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove. Sassoon wrote a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, outlining an alleged quid pro quo proposal from Adams' attorneys. Following Sassoon's resignation, senior US Attorneys in New York also refused to dismiss the case and resigned in protest. Bove, who previously served as Trump's criminal defense attorney, is involved in the case.
• DOJ pressures Public Integrity Section lawyers — DOJ leadership reportedly pressured Public Integrity Section lawyers to decide within an hour who would dismiss the indictment against NYC Mayor Eric Adams, threatening to fire all if none complied. This move has sparked resignations and widespread dismay within the legal community, reminiscent of the 1973 Saturday Night Massacre.
• Memo issued to dismiss Adams case for political reasons — A memo was issued stating that the criminal case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams was dismissed for political reasons, citing that the case restricted his ability to assist in deportation efforts. The memo admitted the decision was not based on evidence or law, raising ethical concerns about the DOJ's actions.
• Prosecutor Hagan Scotten resigns over DOJ pressure — Prosecutor Hagan Scotten resigned after refusing to dismiss a corruption case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams. Scotten's resignation letter criticized the use of prosecutorial power to influence elected officials, stating that he would not comply with such directives. His resignation follows that of co-counsel Danielle Sassoon, highlighting internal DOJ tensions over the case.

Supporting reports

• US Senate confirms Chris Wright as energy secretary — The US Senate confirmed Chris Wright, CEO of Liberty Energy, as the energy secretary under Donald Trump's administration with a vote of 59-38. Wright, known for his controversial views on climate change, will oversee the Department of Energy, which manages a $50 billion budget, including the maintenance of the US nuclear weapons stockpile. Wright has been criticized for downplaying the effects of climate change, particularly in relation to wildfires in California. He will replace Jennifer Granholm, who supported renewable energy sources.
• US Senate confirms Pam Bondi as attorney general — The US Senate confirmed Pam Bondi as the attorney general with a 54-46 vote, largely along party lines. Bondi, a staunch ally of President Trump, will lead the Justice Department during Trump's second term. Her confirmation comes amid significant personnel changes within the department, including the firing of prosecutors involved in cases against Trump. Bondi has pledged to maintain the department's independence, but her ability to resist political pressure from the White House is under scrutiny. The department faces challenges with morale and concerns about becoming an extension of the White House.
• Confirmation of Pam Bondi as attorney general — The Senate confirmed Pam Bondi as attorney general, despite opposition from civil rights groups due to her history of anti-LGBTQ and anti-immigrant stances. The confirmation vote was largely along party lines, with one Democratic senator crossing over to support her.
• Senate finance committee advances RFK Jr's HHS nomination — The Senate finance committee voted to advance Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s nomination as the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The vote was along party lines, with 14 Republicans supporting and 13 Democrats opposing. This advancement sets the stage for a full Senate vote. Kennedy's nomination has been controversial due to his past comments on vaccines and healthcare policies. Despite initial concerns, Republican Senator Bill Cassidy supported the nomination after receiving commitments from the administration. The full Senate vote is expected soon, with Kennedy likely to be confirmed given the Republican majority.
• US Senate confirms Russell Vought to lead OMB — The US Senate confirmed Russell Vought as the director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) with a 53-47 vote along party lines. Vought, a key figure in Project 2025, faced strong opposition from Democrats who fear he will work with Donald Trump to dismantle the federal government. Despite an all-night debate by Democrats, Vought's confirmation proceeded, raising concerns about potential overreach in federal funding decisions and the consolidation of executive power.
• Senate confirms Russell Vought as OMB director — Senate Republicans confirmed Russell Vought as the director of the Office of Management and Budget on February 6, 2025. Vought is known for his right-wing views and has been associated with Project 2025, which aims to reshape government functions.

Supporting reports

• Trump DOJ fires prosecutors involved in investigations against him — The Department of Justice, under Acting Attorney General McHenry, terminated several career prosecutors who were involved in investigations of former President Trump. This action is framed as part of an effort to end the "weaponization of government" and aligns with Trump's agenda. The firings raise concerns about the independence of the DOJ and its role in upholding the rule of law.
• Trump administration fires DOJ lawyers in criminal cases — The Trump administration fired more than a dozen DOJ lawyers involved in two criminal cases against the president. This action raises concerns about the independence of the Justice Department and potential interference in legal proceedings.
• Trump justice department fires officials linked to Jack Smith — On January 27, 2025, Acting Attorney General James McHenry fired over a dozen federal prosecutors who had worked on criminal cases against Donald Trump. These prosecutors were part of Special Counsel Jack Smith's team, which had charged Trump in two cases related to mishandling classified documents and attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. The firings were justified by McHenry as necessary because the prosecutors could not be trusted to implement the president's agenda. This move is part of broader personnel changes within the Justice Department under the Trump administration.
• Trump fires federal prosecutors involved in his prosecutions — On January 27, Trump’s acting attorney general fired more than a dozen federal prosecutors who were involved in the criminal prosecutions against Trump. The official stated that the acting attorney general “does not trust these officials to assist in faithfully implementing the President’s agenda.”
• White House directed firing of special counsel prosecutors — The Justice Department, following instructions from the White House, fired more than a dozen federal prosecutors involved in criminal prosecutions against Donald Trump. The firings were directed by the acting Attorney General, James McHenry, and were linked to a memo from the White House personnel office. This action has raised concerns about the independence of the Justice Department and its potential use as an extension of the White House. The prosecutors were dismissed due to their roles in prosecuting Trump, which was seen as incompatible with the president's agenda.