Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Mar 29, 2026 Kash Patel directed release of a decade-old investigative file on Rep. Eric Swalwell, a Trump critic and gubernatorial candidate Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
The FBI director's push to publicize a file on a political opponent despite prior exoneration exemplifies use of federal law enforcement resources against critics.
Supporting reports
- FBI Director Kash Patel pressed to release decade-old investigative file on Rep. Eric Swalwell. — FBI Director Kash Patel directed agents in the San Francisco office to quickly redact and prepare for public release a decade-old investigative file involving Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) and a suspected Chinese intelligence operative, despite no evidence of wrongdoing by Swalwell. The file concerns Christine Fang (Fang Fang), who courted Swalwell and other California politicians from 2011–2015. When FBI agents conveyed concerns about Fang to Swalwell around 2015, he cut off ties and cooperated with investigators. Swalwell was not accused of wrongdoing in the original investigation, and the Republican-led House Ethics Committee closed a two-year investigation in 2023 with no action. Patel has reassigned multiple agents to work on bringing a criminal case against Swalwell, a vocal Trump critic and leading Democratic candidate for California governor.
- Trump FBI director Kash Patel pushes for release of Eric Swalwell investigative records — FBI Director Kash Patel, under the Trump administration, is reportedly pushing to release records from a decade-old FBI investigation into Eric Swalwell's alleged links to a Chinese agent. Swalwell, a Democratic congressman and California gubernatorial candidate, was found cooperative and not suspected of wrongdoing. The move occurs as Swalwell gains traction in the governor's race. Democrats characterize the effort as weaponized retaliation against a political opponent. Swalwell's attorneys issued a cease-and-desist letter on Monday.
Mar 9, 2026 Department of Justice released only a partial set of Epstein-related documents concerning an accusation against Trump Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
DOJ's selective and incomplete release of documents concerning a serious allegation against the sitting president left dozens of pages withheld without explanation.
Supporting reports
- Department of Justice released Epstein documents concerning Trump rape allegation — Under pressure regarding the Epstein files, the Department of Justice released documents concerning an allegation from an Epstein survivor that Trump raped her when she was thirteen or fourteen. The release included four separate FBI interview summaries (FD-302 forms). The DOJ's initial document drop included only the interview discussing abuse at Epstein's hands; the other three interviews discuss Trump. Some files related to the accusation and interviews remain missing.
- DOJ releases Epstein documents related to Trump — The Department of Justice released documents concerning an allegation from an Epstein survivor that Donald Trump raped her when she was a minor. The documents included four FBI interview summaries, known as 302 reports, detailing the survivor's accounts of abuse, including interactions with Trump. Some files related to the accusation remain missing.
- DOJ continues to withhold 37 pages of documents related to Trump sexual assault allegations — According to NPR reporting cited in the article, 53 pages of materials related to Trump's alleged sexual assault of a minor were excluded from the DOJ's January 30, 2026 release of Epstein documents. As of March 10, only 16 pages have been disclosed, leaving 37 pages still withheld by the Trump administration. The missing documents include notes from interviews, a law enforcement report, and license records. The DOJ has not provided an explanation for the continued withholding.
Feb 9, 2026 Jamie Raskin accused DOJ of improper redactions concealing alleged abusers in Epstein files Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
A congressman alleged the Justice Department redacted names of powerful alleged abusers while failing to protect victims' identities, calling it either incompetence or deliberate cover-up.
Supporting reports
- Jamie Raskin accuses DOJ of improper redactions in Epstein files — Rep. Jamie Raskin, House Judiciary ranking member, reviewed unredacted Epstein files at a DOJ facility in Washington DC on February 9 and publicly accused the Justice Department of making "mysterious redactions" that obscured names of alleged abusers while failing to redact victims' identities. Raskin stated the redactions were either "spectacular incompetence" or a deliberate threat to survivors. He said he reviewed approximately 30–40 unredacted files and identified unnecessary redactions of public figures including Les Wexner and references to Trump. Raskin announced he would raise the issue with Attorney General Pam Bondi at her scheduled House Judiciary Committee testimony.
- House members reviewed unredacted Epstein documents revealing child victims as young as nine years old and multiple co-conspirators — Representatives including Jamie Raskin, Jared Moskowitz, and Jasmine Crockett reviewed previously redacted Epstein documents at the Department of Justice. The documents revealed evidence of victims as young as nine years old and identified numerous co-conspirators in the international child sex trafficking operation. Raskin noted unnecessary redactions beyond victim name protection and stated that a billion-dollar trafficking ring could not operate with only two perpetrators. The documents also contained references to Trump's relationship with Epstein at Mar-a-Lago that had been redacted.
- Rep. James Walkinshaw identified improperly redacted Epstein email involving Trump — Rep. James Walkinshaw reported that he reviewed Epstein file redactions and found an email from Epstein's attorneys recounting a 2009 conversation with Trump that contained no mention of victims and should not have been redacted. Walkinshaw noted there were many other inexplicable redactions in the files.
- Rep. Jamie Raskin documented severe restrictions on congressional access to Epstein files — Rep. Jamie Raskin stated that the DOJ is providing Congress with only four computers in a satellite office to review more than 3 million unredacted Epstein documents. Raskin calculated that working 40 hours per week on nothing else, it would take more than 7 years for the 217 House members who signed the discharge petition to read only the documents the DOJ has decided to release, with 3 million additional documents still being withheld.
- Rep. Ro Khanna criticized DOJ redactions of Epstein files — Rep. Ro Khanna stated on MSNBC that the Epstein files released by the DOJ had already been scrubbed by Trump's FBI in March 2025 before being provided to Congress. Khanna alleged that the DOJ is protecting powerful people by maintaining redactions and that the vast majority of documents containing survivor statements remain unredacted, preventing full accountability for crimes.
- Rep. Thomas Massie revealed DOJ unredacted co-conspirator identities in Epstein files — Rep. Thomas Massie reported that in response to his social media posts, the DOJ unredacted FBI files labeling two individuals as co-conspirators in child sex trafficking, unredacted files listing men who might be implicated, and tacitly admitted that Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem sent a torture video to Epstein. Massie noted that FBI's own 2019 document listed Wexner as a coconspirator, information not previously unredacted, and that no one knew the sender of the torture video until he obtained the unredacted email.
- Attorney General Bondi refused to release Epstein files to public as required by law — Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Judiciary Committee but refused to release all Epstein files to the public as Congress required when it passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Bondi did not acknowledge survivors of Epstein's sexual assaults and sex trafficking who were present in the audience. When Representative Pramila Jayapal urged her to apologize to survivors for the sloppiness of the release that left many survivors' names, identifying information, and sexually explicit photos unredacted while covering perpetrators' names, Bondi accused Jayapal of theatrics and dragging the hearing "into the gutter."
- National Parks Foundation agreed to keep Freedom 250 donors anonymous — A representative for the National Parks Foundation, which is serving as the legal vehicle for Freedom 250, told a Congressional committee that it would keep donors anonymous upon request. This arrangement allows major corporations to fund partisan political advocacy through a nonprofit structure while maintaining donor confidentiality.
Jan 31, 2026 DOJ released Epstein documents with thousands of redaction errors exposing survivors' identities Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
A flawed disclosure process publicly revealed victims' names and personal information despite legal protections meant to shield them.
Supporting reports
- US Justice Department releases 3 million Epstein files with redaction errors exposing survivors' identities — The US Justice Department released approximately 3 million documents related to Jeffrey Epstein on Friday, 31 January 2026, as required by the congressionally mandated Epstein Files Transparency Act. However, attorneys for sex-trafficking survivors reported thousands of redaction errors that exposed victims' identities despite legal protections. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that certain categories—including victims' personally identifying information, medical files, and child sexual abuse images—were withheld, but victims' attorneys contradicted this, citing constant calls from survivors whose names were publicly released without their consent.
- DOJ withheld 3 million Epstein documents from release — Rep. Dan Goldman reported that the DOJ withheld approximately 3 million documents from the Epstein file release based on exceptions to the law, without explanation. Goldman noted that Trump's name appears throughout the withheld material and questioned why the DOJ was permitted to decide unilaterally which documents to withhold.
- Epstein survivors reported re-traumatization and online harassment from leaked names — Epstein survivors reported that the exposure of their names in DOJ-released files has been re-traumatizing, forcing them to relive abuse while racing to prevent spread of their identities online. Media outlets and influencers on X have begun publishing women's names. Victims reported receiving online harassment since the documents became public. Survivor Anouska de Georgiou stated: "I cooperated with the US govt when it asked for my help, and now it has failed me—and other survivors—by demonstrating a profound disregard for the safety, protection, and well-being of victims."
- DOJ failed to redact Epstein victims' names in public release — The DOJ released Epstein files on Friday with the names of dozens of victims unredacted, including minors. A review of 47 victims found 43 had full names left unredacted in publicly available files. More than two dozen minor victims' names were exposed along with personally identifying details including home addresses. The DOJ was required by law to redact all victims' names prior to release. Victims' attorneys had provided a list of 350 names to DOJ on December 4 to ensure redaction, but the agency failed to perform a basic keyword search to verify the redaction process succeeded.
Sep 4, 2025 James O'Keefe released hidden-camera video of DOJ official describing selective redaction of Epstein files Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
The recording suggested plans to shield Republicans while exposing Democrats in file releases, raising questions about politicized document handling.
Supporting reports
- DOJ official recorded discussing selective redaction of Epstein files — Joseph Schnitt, Acting Deputy Chief at the DOJ, was recorded on hidden camera by an operative associated with James O'Keefe discussing the handling of Epstein files. According to the video, Schnitt stated that files would be redacted to remove names of Republicans and conservatives while leaving Democratic names visible, suggesting partisan manipulation of sensitive investigative materials.
- James O'Keefe released video of DOJ official making statements about Ghislaine Maxwell — Right-wing activist James O'Keefe released a video showing Joseph Schnitt, the Department of Justice's acting deputy chief of special operations, stating that convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell was moved to a minimum security prison because the government is "offering her something to keep her mouth shut." Schnitt also told an undercover journalist that the Epstein files exist and that before release, the government will "redact every Republican and conservative person in those files and leave all the liberal, Democratic people."
Sep 4, 2025 Joseph Schnitt discussed selective redaction of investigative files favoring political allies Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
A DOJ official's recorded remarks alleged partisan manipulation of sensitive Epstein-related documents before release, undermining rule-of-law integrity.
Supporting reports
- DOJ official recorded discussing selective redaction of Epstein files — Joseph Schnitt, Acting Deputy Chief at the DOJ, was recorded on hidden camera by an operative associated with James O'Keefe discussing the handling of Epstein files. According to the video, Schnitt stated that files would be redacted to remove names of Republicans and conservatives while leaving Democratic names visible, suggesting partisan manipulation of sensitive investigative materials.
Aug 28, 2025 FBI accessed a private encrypted group chat of immigration court-watch activists and labeled them extremists Corroborated Information, Memory and Manipulation
Surveillance of lawful civic observers of public court proceedings and mischaracterizing them as violent extremists chilled protected civic monitoring.
Supporting reports
- FBI accessed private Signal group chat of immigration court-watch activists — The FBI gained access to encrypted Signal conversations of New York immigration activists organizing "courtwatch" efforts to monitor public federal immigration court proceedings. An August 2025 joint FBI-NYPD report quoted from the private chat and characterized court watchers as "anarchist violent extremist actors," despite the courtwatch activities being non-violent legal observation of public hearings. The report was distributed to law enforcement agencies nationwide. The method of access to the encrypted platform remains unclear.
Jul 23, 2025 Wall Street Journal reported by staff reported that Trump's name appeared multiple times in DOJ Epstein files despite denials Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
New reporting contradicted the administration's earlier public denials about the president's presence in investigative files.
Supporting reports
- Trump's name reported in DOJ Epstein files; Congress subpoenas Maxwell — The Wall Street Journal reported that Donald Trump's name appears multiple times in Department of Justice files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May that he was named in the files, though she stated the findings warranted no further investigation. The House Oversight Committee voted 8–2 to subpoena DOJ for Epstein-related files and subpoenaed Ghislaine Maxwell for a deposition on August 11. Trump subsequently filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Journal and banned one of its reporters from Air Force One.
- Wall Street Journal reported Trump's name in Epstein files — The Wall Street Journal reported that AG Bondi told Trump in May that his name was in the Epstein files, following a review by Justice Department officials who discovered his name "multiple times" in the "truckload" of documents. The bombshell report comes one week after Trump told reporters that Bondi told him he wasn't in the files.
- Trump informed months ago that his name in Epstein files — The New York Times reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy AG Todd Blanche, both former Trump lawyers, informed the president months ago that his name, along with those of other high-profile figures, had appeared in documents connected to the Epstein case that had not previously been made public. This contradicts Trump's denials of prior knowledge. The White House responded by characterizing the report as "fake news" concocted by Democrats and the liberal media.
Mar 23, 2025 Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and other officials shared classified operational details of military strikes on Yemen via an unsecured commercial messaging app, inadvertently including a journalist Tier 1 · Primary Information, Memory and Manipulation
Senior national security officials discussed classified war plans on an insecure app that accidentally included a journalist, exposing operational security failures at the highest levels.
Supporting reports
- VP Vance expressed disagreement with Yemen military operation in Signal chat — Vice President JD Vance texted concerns about the planned Houthi military operation in a Signal group chat, stating "I think we are making a mistake" and noting that only 3% of U.S. trade and 40% of European trade runs through the Suez Canal, suggesting the public may not understand the necessity of the operation. Secretary Hegseth responded by defending the operation as necessary to restore freedom of navigation and reestablish deterrence, citing risks of leaks and Israeli action if delayed.
- Secretary of Defense Hegseth shared classified military operational details via unsecured Signal messaging — Jeffrey Goldberg reported in The Atlantic that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth texted him classified war plans for missile strikes against Houthis in Yemen approximately two hours before the operation commenced. Hegseth's message, sent at 11:44 a.m., included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing. Goldberg was subsequently added to a Signal group chat called "Houthi PC small group" with 18 senior officials including VP JD Vance, NSA Mike Waltz, DNI Tulsi Gabbard, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. The White House National Security Council confirmed the incident occurred but characterized it as an "inadvertent" addition to the chain.
- Trump administration discussed military strike on Houthis via unsecure Signal app — On March 24, Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic reported that senior Trump administration officials, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, discussed a military strike on Houthis in Yemen using an unsecure commercial Signal messaging app. Hegseth posted precise details of munitions and aircraft involved. The app was configured to auto-delete messages in violation of the Presidential Records Act. Neither President Trump nor the acting Joint Chiefs chairman was included; White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller apparently made the strike decision based on his interpretation of Trump's wishes. The White House declared the matter "closed" on March 31 without investigation or resignations.
- Atlantic editor added to White House Signal group chat discussing Yemen airstrikes — The Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was added to a Signal group chat in which Trump administration officials, including Vice-President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, discussed and coordinated airstrikes against Houthis in Yemen. The breach was revealed when Goldberg published an article about it on Monday. Democratic senators interrogated intelligence officials Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe at a Senate hearing, criticizing the "sloppy, careless" handling of sensitive military operational details. The Defense Department had warned against Signal use due to Russian hacking threats.
- White House security breach: classified Yemen war plans shared via Signal with journalist — Senior Trump administration officials—including Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and others—inadvertently included Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg in a Signal group chat discussing classified military plans for US strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. Signal is not approved by the US government for classified communications. Goldberg discovered the breach, removed sensitive material including a CIA officer's identity, and published an account. The NSC confirmed the "inadvertent" inclusion; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called it "one of the most stunning breaches of military intelligence" in recent memory.
- Atlantic editor Goldberg disputes national security adviser Waltz's explanation for Signal group chat inclusion — Jeffrey Goldberg, editor of The Atlantic, publicly disputed National Security Adviser Mike Waltz's account of how Goldberg was added to a Trump administration Signal group chat discussing imminent U.S. military strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. Waltz claimed Goldberg's contact was "sucked into" his phone via another contact; Goldberg countered on NBC's Meet the Press that the explanation was implausible and that Waltz had simply mistakenly added him because his number was already in Waltz's phone. The NSC confirmed message authenticity and said it was reviewing the incident.
- Trump administration officials share sensitive military plans in leaked Signal group chat — Pete Hegseth, US defense secretary, and other Trump administration officials including Vice President JD Vance and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz discussed sensitive details of a US airstrike in Yemen in a Signal group chat. Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of the Atlantic, was mistakenly added to the chat. The Atlantic published details on 24 March, triggering controversy. A subsequent poll found 54% of registered voters and 38% of Republicans believe Hegseth should resign. Trump has declined to fire anyone involved, dismissing the incident as a "glitch."
- Jeffrey Goldberg revealed Signal group chat with classified military plans — Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, published a bombshell article revealing he had been added to a Signal group chat of senior Trump administration officials, including Cabinet members, that focused on highly-sensitive, detailed plans for military strikes in Yemen. National security adviser Mike Waltz later took "full responsibility" for the breach. The chat contained classified information about strike timings, planes, and drones.
- White House accidentally shared classified Yemen war plans via Signal group chat with journalist — Senior Trump administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, accidentally added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal group chat containing highly sensitive military plans regarding airstrikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen. The messages were set to auto-delete within four weeks, potentially violating the Federal Records Act. The White House confirmed the leak but characterized it as "deep and thoughtful policy coordination," while lawmakers from both parties condemned it as a catastrophic security breach and called for investigations.
- White House security breach: classified Yemen strike planning discussed in compromised Signal group chat — Senior Trump administration officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and others, discussed operational details of a planned military strike on Yemen in an encrypted Signal group chat. The chat was compromised when National Security Adviser Waltz invited Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to the group without authorization. Participants discussed messaging strategy, operational security concerns, and geopolitical implications. The Atlantic withheld publication of sensitive "TEAM UPDATE" material citing risk to U.S. servicemen and operations.
- White House officials' Signal chat group accidentally leaked to journalist — A journalist from The Atlantic was accidentally added to a Signal messaging group containing deliberations by 18 senior Trump administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, regarding planning for strikes on Houthis in Yemen. The leak exposed operational security failures, classified military planning details, and internal disagreements on sensitive foreign policy matters. The incident revealed use of an unapproved commercial messaging app for highly classified discussions instead of secure government facilities.
- Secretary of Defense Hegseth and senior officials planned military strikes on Yemen via unsecure Signal messaging app — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other senior administration officials discussed and planned military strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen using Signal, a commercial messaging app. National Security Advisor Waltz added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat without authorization. Hegseth uploaded precise attack details before the operation, exposing timing and targeting information. The chat was set to auto-delete messages after four weeks and was conducted on personal, unsecure devices vulnerable to foreign intelligence penetration.
- Der Spiegel reports Trump officials' private data accessible online via hacked dumps and commercial providers — German magazine Der Spiegel reported that mobile phone numbers, email addresses, and passwords belonging to US national security officials—including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard—were discoverable online through commercial data-search services and hacked data dumps. The exposure followed the officials' use of Signal to discuss sensitive military plans for airstrikes on Yemen. The NSC stated that Waltz's accounts had been changed in 2019, but the report raised concerns about potential foreign espionage during the recent classified communications.
- Mike Waltz accepts responsibility for Signal group chat leak including journalist Jeffrey Goldberg — Michael Waltz, Trump's national security adviser, claimed "full responsibility" for creating a Signal group chat that inadvertently included Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg. The group, containing Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other senior officials, discussed operational details of planned airstrikes on Houthis in Yemen. Waltz said he could not explain how Goldberg's number ended up in the chat, though he suggested the journalist may have deliberately infiltrated it. The breach exposed highly sensitive national security information and drew criticism from Senate Democrats.
- White House Signal Chat Leak Reveals Security Breach — A leak from a Signal chat involving senior Trump administration officials revealed that top-secret military plans concerning US attacks on the Houthis in Yemen were inadvertently sent to a journalist. The chat also contained disparaging remarks about European allies, highlighting a lack of secure communication practices within the administration. This breach raises concerns about the handling of sensitive information and the potential impact on global stability, as it exposes the administration's reckless approach to national security matters.
- Signal chat leak reveals classified military details shared by Trump cabinet officials — A Signal group chat used by Trump administration officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, leaked to the Atlantic, containing operational details about US military strikes in Yemen. The messages included launch times of F-18 fighter jets, bomb-drop schedules, and Tomahawk missile timelines sent before operations occurred. Despite potential violations of classification protocols, federal record-keeping laws, and the Presidential Records Act, White House officials deny the messages were classified. A watchdog lawsuit seeks to compel preservation of the messages.
- Signal group chat leak: journalist Jeffrey Goldberg accidentally added to White House national security discussion — Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was accidentally added to a Signal group chat that included the U.S. defense secretary, White House national security adviser, and intelligence community heads discussing plans to strike Yemen. Goldberg reported on the leak, prompting administration officials including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to publicly attack him, calling him a "loser" and "deceitful" journalist. The incident raised questions about operational security and accountability within Trump's cabinet.
- The Atlantic published screenshots of classified Signal messages discussing Yemen military strikes — The Atlantic published screenshots of the Signal group chat messages in which senior administration officials discussed and planned military strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen. The messages revealed that Secretary of Defense Hegseth had uploaded precise attack details including timing and targeting information before the operation commenced. The publication followed administration officials' repeated denials that classified information had been shared, and came after The Atlantic's reporters determined there was clear public interest in disclosing the information.
- Trump national security team discusses Yemen airstrikes on Signal messaging app with journalist present — President Trump's national security team, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, conducted planning discussions about airstrikes on Houthi forces in Yemen via the Signal messaging app. Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was added to the group chat and witnessed the discussions in real time. Goldberg subsequently published an article about the incident and later released a transcript of the chat. The leak prompted bipartisan congressional concern about the handling of sensitive information on an unsecured platform known to be targeted by Russian hackers.