Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Oct 21, 2026 DOJ arrested Omar Muñoz, a 72-year-old green card holder, in a high-profile voter fraud operation Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
A theatrical armed arrest of an elderly, frail permanent resident ahead of midterms exemplifies use of law enforcement spectacle to suggest widespread voter fraud.
Supporting reports
- DHS arrests Omar Muñoz in high-profile operation for alleged unlawful voter registration — Department of Homeland Security agents arrested Omar Muñoz, a 72-year-old lawful permanent resident, at his Commerce, California home in an early morning operation on October 21, 2026. Muñoz was one of 28 green card holders charged in California with allegedly registering to vote unlawfully. The arrest was conducted with significant law enforcement presence, including a helicopter, and was subsequently publicized by the Department of Justice in a promotional video. Muñoz, who is frail from recent surgeries, was handcuffed and shackled despite his physical condition. The operation occurred two weeks before midterm elections.
Sep 25, 2026 DHS allegedly directed federal agents to impersonate voters using citizens' personal data Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
A whistleblower alleged agents unlawfully used Social Security numbers to look up voter history on state websites, prompting senators to request an investigation into potential privacy and election-law violations.
Supporting reports
- DHS whistleblower alleges voter impersonation by federal agents — A Department of Homeland Security whistleblower alleged that DHS, as part of its "Unlawful Voter Initiative," directed federal agents to impersonate voters in violation of state laws, using Social Security numbers and other information to look up voter history on state websites. The allegation prompted US Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff to request an investigation by California's attorney general, citing concerns about how DHS obtained and used voter data and whether it complied with law.
Sep 15, 2026 DHS created unreliable law enforcement records against voters Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
A whistleblower alleged DHS created thousands of potentially false records against California residents based on unverified data, exposing people to wrongful immigration enforcement.
Supporting reports
- DHS created thousands of potentially unreliable Tecs records on voters based on unverified data — A whistleblower disclosed that the Department of Homeland Security created thousands of records in the Tecs law enforcement database against California residents based on data officers had reason to believe was unreliable or inaccurate. In some cases, DHS provided officers with names and voting dates that did not match state voter registration records. Officers were instructed to create files despite these contradictions and without access to corroborating information, potentially resulting in tens of thousands of erroneous records affecting residents' legal status.
Sep 2, 2026 Homeland Security Investigations launched a coordinated voter-fraud investigation across nine states ahead of midterms Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
Deployment of federal immigration enforcement into election investigations two months before midterms raises concerns about voter intimidation and politicized law enforcement.
Supporting reports
- Homeland Security Investigations launches coordinated voter fraud initiative — Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) began a coordinated voter fraud investigation across nine states, directing agents to investigate leads, conduct interviews, and develop cases for federal prosecutors. USCIS investigators are also assisting with election-related work, pulling the federal immigration system into election enforcement less than two months before the midterm elections.
- HSI launches nine-state voter-fraud investigation surge — Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the investigative arm of ICE, has launched a voter-fraud investigation surge across nine states. The operation is set to start approximately two months before Election Day (November 3, 2026) and is planned to continue into the period when early and mail voting will be underway. Investigators have been instructed to follow leads and help move cases to federal prosecutors. The operation is scheduled to wind down in mid-October.
Oct 9, 2025 Trump administration filed a brief opposing Section 2 protections of the Voting Rights Act in Louisiana v Callais Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
The DOJ reversed its enforcement posture on minority voting rights, withdrawing from all pending Section 2 cases and urging weaker protections at the Supreme Court.
Supporting reports
- Trump administration files brief opposing Section 2 of Voting Rights Act in Louisiana v Callais — The Trump administration filed a brief in Louisiana v Callais siding with white voters challenging Louisiana's majority-Black congressional district and urging the Supreme Court to make it harder to win Section 2 cases. The brief argues that Section 2 is "deployed as a form of electoral race-based affirmative action." Since Trump's inauguration, the Justice Department has withdrawn from all pending Section 2 cases and has not filed any new ones, marking a reversal of prior federal enforcement of voting rights protections.
Sep 20, 2025 DOJ sued Oregon and Maine over failure to turn over voter registration lists and information about ineligible voters Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
Federal litigation demanding sensitive voter data from states raises concerns about weaponized election oversight targeting Democratic-led jurisdictions.
Supporting reports
- DOJ sued Oregon and Maine over voter registration lists — The Justice Department said it sued Oregon and Maine for failing to turn over their voter registration lists and information about ineligible voters, a move it argues violates federal law. Oregon's secretary of state responded that "If the President wants to use the DOJ to go after his political opponents and undermine our elections, I look forward to seeing them in court."
Aug 31, 2025 DOJ demanded voting data from at least 19 states Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
Federal demands for state voter data without clear legal authority raise concerns about voter suppression ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Supporting reports
- Trump administration demands voting data from 19 states — Trump's appointees at the Department of Justice demanded voting data from at least 19 states in an apparent attempt to identify ineligible voters. This action follows Trump's earlier executive order requiring documented proof of citizenship to register to vote, much of which has been blocked by courts. The demand represents a coordinated federal effort to scrutinize voter rolls ahead of the 2026 midterms.