Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• US judge orders Trump administration to return wrongly deported gay man — A federal judge, Brian Murphy, ordered the Trump administration to facilitate the return of a Guatemalan man, identified as OCG, who was wrongly deported to Mexico despite fears of harm. OCG, who is gay, had applied for asylum in the US after facing homophobic violence in Guatemala. The deportation was found to lack due process, and the judge emphasized that OCG posed no security threat. This ruling is part of a series of court findings against recent deportations by the Trump administration.

Supporting reports

• Trump criticizes Harvard for foreign student enrollment — Trump criticized Harvard University for its high percentage of foreign students, demanding transparency regarding their funding and enrollment, which he claims is a misuse of taxpayer dollars.
• Trump Administration Seeks List of Harvard's Foreign Students — President Trump criticized Harvard University for admitting too many international students and expressed a desire for a list of these students, which the Department of Homeland Security already has access to through the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) database. Earlier, DHS terminated Harvard’s SEVP certification.

Supporting reports

• Preliminary injunction ruling — Jane Doe 1 v. Bondi (N.D. Ga.) 1:25-cv-01998 — The court issued a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking the government from arresting, detaining, or deporting over 4,700 international students whose F-1 visa statuses were abruptly revoked without notice.
• Federal Judge Temporarily Bars Termination of International Students’ Legal Status — A federal judge temporarily barred the Trump administration from terminating the legal status of international students while a court case proceeds. This order protects students from immediate deportation.

Supporting reports

• Judge Blocks DHS Order Revoking Student Visas — U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs issued a temporary restraining order blocking DHS Secretary Kristi Noem's order to revoke visas for foreign students at Harvard University. The order, which Harvard claims would affect over 7,000 visa holders, is being challenged in court for its potential to harm the university and its international student body. A hearing on the lawsuit is scheduled for Tuesday.
• Temporary restraining order ruling — President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-11472 — Judge Allison Burroughs granted a temporary restraining order (TRO).

Supporting reports

• ICE Denies Mahmoud Khalil Contact Visit with Newborn Son — Mahmoud Khalil, a detained Columbia University graduate and Palestinian activist, was denied a contact visit with his newborn son by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials. Khalil, who is being held in a Louisiana detention facility, was forced to meet his month-old baby behind glass. ICE and a private prison contractor cited the detention center's no-contact visitation policy and unspecified security concerns for the denial. Khalil's wife, Noor Abdalla, who traveled from New York with their newborn, expressed outrage at the decision, calling it a deliberate act of cruelty.
• ICE Denies Contact Visit for Detainee’s Family — Mahmoud Khalil's legal team reported that ICE and GEO Group denied a contact visit with his wife and newborn, violating ICE standards. This denial raises concerns about detainee rights and family separation policies.

Supporting reports

• ICE Detains Columbia Student Mahmoud Khalil — Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student and green card holder, remains detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Louisiana. Khalil was arrested in March, allegedly in retaliation for his advocacy for Palestinian rights. Surveillance footage released contradicts claims that Khalil attempted to flee during his arrest. Khalil's detention has sparked protests, including at Columbia's graduation ceremony, where students chanted "Free Mahmoud." An immigration hearing is scheduled for May 22, and Khalil awaits a ruling from a New Jersey judge on his case.

Supporting reports

• Preliminary injunction ruling — Y.A.P.A v. Trump (M.D. Ga.) 4:25-cv-00144 — Judge Clay Land granted a preliminary injunction barring the government from transferring a Venezuelan detainee under the Alien Enemies Act, holding that removal is prohibited until the government complies with the requirements of the Supreme Court's recent decision in A.A.R.P.
• Federal Judge Blocks Deportation of Venezuelan Man to El Salvador — A federal judge in Georgia temporarily blocked the deportation of a Venezuelan man to El Salvador, citing concerns about due process. This order prevents a potentially harmful deportation.

Supporting reports

• DHS Secretary Kristi Noem revokes Harvard's Foreign Exchange Student Program — DHS Secretary Kristi Noem sent a letter to Harvard University revoking their Foreign Exchange Student Program effective immediately, preventing the enrollment of additional foreign students and requiring current students to transfer or leave the country. This action follows Harvard's failure to comply with reporting requirements requested by Noem. Legal challenges are expected in federal court in Boston.
• Trump Administration Revokes Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students — The Trump administration revoked Harvard University's ability to enroll international students, citing alleged anti-American activities. This decision affects thousands of students and raises concerns about academic freedom and international education.

Supporting reports

• Case update — D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10676 — Judge Murphy ordered the Defendants to maintain custody and control of class members currently being removed to South Sudan or to any other third country and to ensure the practical feasibility of their return if the court finds that such removals were unlawful. The court also ordered that Defendants be prepared by the next hearing, scheduled for May 21, to identify the time and manner of notice each individual in the affected class received as to their third-country removal, and what opportunity each individual had to raise a fear-based claim.
• Federal Judge Orders Trump Administration to Maintain Custody of Immigrants — A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to maintain custody of immigrants being flown to South Sudan, citing potential violations of a court order. This decision emphasizes the need for compliance with legal processes in deportation cases.
• Judge rules White House violated order by deporting migrants to South Sudan — A federal judge in Massachusetts, Brian E. Murphy, ruled that the Trump administration violated a court order by deporting migrants to South Sudan. The ruling came after the administration deported eight individuals, despite a previous injunction requiring due process for deportations to third countries. The judge criticized the administration for providing insufficient notice to the deportees and ordered clarification on the deportation process. The case highlights ongoing legal challenges against the administration's immigration policies, particularly concerning the deportation of individuals to countries where they may face harm.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — D.V.D. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10676 — Following an emergency hearing, Judge Murphy found the government violated the court's preliminary injunction by deporting at least six members of the class to South Sudan without meaningful opportunity to assert claims of protection under the Torture Convention. Judge Murphy held that “no reasonable interpretation of the Court's Preliminary Injunction” could endorse the government's action. The court issued a “summary and clarification” of the injunction requiring removal to a third country to include written notice to both the non-citizen and the non-citizen's counsel in a language the non-citizen can understand, and a meaningful opportunity and a minimum of ten days to raise a fear-based claim for Torture Convention protection (plus an additional 15 days if to seek reopening of immigration proceedings if initially denied). Also following the emergency hearing, Judge Murphy issued a separate order to remedy the violation of the preliminary injunction. It requires giving the six individuals a reasonable fear of torture interview including access to counsel, an interpreter, and technology for transfer of documents “commensurate with the access that they would have received had these procedures occurred within the United States prior to their deportation.”
• Federal Judge Rules Trump Administration Violated Court Order — A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration violated a court order by deporting seven men to South Sudan without due process, with officials potentially facing criminal contempt penalties. This ruling emphasizes the importance of legal compliance in deportation cases.
• Judge rules administration violated court order on deportations — Judge Brian Murphy of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the administration violated a court order by deporting eight men to South Sudan without providing them due process. The court had mandated that the men be given a fair review before being sent to a country other than their own.
• Court halts Trump administration’s deportation of eight men to South Sudan — A federal court ruling has halted the Trump administration's attempt to deport eight men to South Sudan. The men, who are currently in temporary custody in Djibouti, were initially set to be deported despite their home countries refusing to accept them. US District Judge Brian Murphy criticized the administration for not providing adequate time for the men to legally challenge their deportation, ruling that they must be given at least 15 days to contest the decision. The ruling aligns with international human rights standards and allows six of the men to assert fears of torture or mistreatment.

Supporting reports

• US Supreme Court allows Trump to revoke protected status for Venezuelans — The US Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration's request to revoke Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for approximately 350,000 Venezuelans. This decision allows the administration to proceed with plans to end legal protections that shield these individuals from deportation, despite an ongoing appeal in a lower court. The ruling follows a previous decision by a federal judge in California to temporarily block the administration's efforts, citing concerns of racism. The Supreme Court's order was unsigned, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting.
• Motion granted — National TPS Alliance et al. v. Noem (N.D. Cal.) 3:25-cv-01766 — The Supreme Court granted the stay for the government.
• Supreme Court Grants Stay in Noem v. National TPS Alliance — The Supreme Court granted an emergency application from the federal government to stay a lower court's order in the case of Noem v. National TPS Alliance. This decision temporarily halts the enforcement of a ruling by Judge Edward Chen, which had paused the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for individuals from Venezuela and Haiti. The stay allows the Department of Homeland Security, led by Secretary Kristi Noem, to proceed with ending the TPS designation while the case is under appeal. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the decision.
• Supreme Court Approves Termination of TPS for Venezuelans — The Supreme Court approved an emergency appeal from the Trump administration to terminate Temporary Protected Status for approximately 350,000 Venezuelans, paving the way for their potential deportation. This decision affects the legal status and future of many immigrants.
• Supreme Court grants stay in Noem v. Nat. TPS Alliance — The Supreme Court granted a stay on the March 31, 2025 order from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in the case Noem, Sec., DHS, et al. v. Nat. TPS Alliance, et al. This stay is pending the outcome of an appeal in the Ninth Circuit and any potential petition for a writ of certiorari. If certiorari is denied, the stay will automatically terminate. If granted, the stay will end upon the Supreme Court's judgment. The order does not affect challenges to Secretary Noem's February 3, 2025 vacatur notice regarding certain immigration documents.
• Venezuelan immigrants express betrayal over TPS revocation — Venezuelan immigrants who previously supported Trump expressed feelings of betrayal after the revocation of their Temporary Protected Status (TPS), which now subjects them to potential deportation.

Supporting reports

• Temporary restraining order ruling — Darwin Antonio Arevalo Millan v. Trump (C.D. Cal.) 5:25-cv-01207 — Judge John Holcomb certified a class of noncitizens in the district subject to the AEA and granted a temporary restraining order .
• Federal Judge Blocks Deportation Under Alien Enemies Act — A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from deporting immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act from the District of Central California. This order prevents deportations that may violate due process rights.

Supporting reports

• US House of Representatives Allocates $46.5 Billion for Border Wall — On April 27, the US House of Representatives' Homeland Security Committee proposed a budget allocating $46.5 billion to fund new sections of the border wall along the US-Mexico border. This allocation is part of a renewed push to complete the border wall, a contentious issue from the first Trump administration. The funding comes amid declining unauthorized crossings, raising questions about the necessity and environmental impact of the wall.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge blocks IRS from sharing tax records with ICE — A federal judge rejected a preliminary injunction to prevent the IRS from sharing sensitive tax records of immigrants with ICE, allowing the agency to continue its practices.

Supporting reports

• DHS ends temporary protected status for Afghan nationals — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced the termination of temporary protected status for Afghan nationals living in the US, effective July 12, claiming improvements in Afghanistan's security and economic situation.

Supporting reports

• Reality show concept for immigrants proposed — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has been in discussions about creating a reality show where immigrants compete in cultural contests for expedited citizenship applications. This proposal has been criticized as a trivialization of the immigration process.
• DHS proposes reality show for immigrants — The Department of Homeland Security is in talks to create a reality television show featuring immigrants competing for potential US citizenship, a proposal that has drawn criticism for its ethical implications.

Supporting reports

• Republicans attempt to pass significant budget bill — Republicans in Congress attempted to advance a budget measure dubbed “One, Big, Beautiful Bill,” which aimed to extend Trump’s tax cuts at a projected cost of $4.6 trillion over ten years while raising the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. The bill faced opposition and ultimately failed to advance out of the House Budget Committee.
• House Budget Committee passes bill in late-night session — The House Budget Committee passed a budget bill after a late-night session, with some members who previously voted 'No' changing their votes to 'Present.' The bill is set to face further scrutiny in the Rules Committee.
• Republicans criticized for scheduling votes at odd hours — Several Democratic representatives criticized Republicans for scheduling votes on significant legislation during late-night hours, suggesting a lack of transparency and public engagement in the legislative process.
• House Committee Advances Trump’s Tax Cut Bill — On May 18, 2025, a key House committee passed a tax cut and border security package, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, after reaching an agreement with far-right Republicans who had previously stalled its progress. The bill, which aims to extend tax breaks from Trump's first term and increase spending on border security, faces challenges in the full House due to potential opposition from moderates concerned about cuts to climate incentives and healthcare programs. The bill's passage is crucial for Republicans, who need to unite their party to pass it before the Memorial Day deadline.
• House Budget Committee Passes Controversial Bill — The House Budget Committee passed a bill referred to as the “Big, Beautiful Bill” on a party-line vote, with 17 Republicans in favor and 16 Democrats against. The bill includes cuts to Medicaid and extends tax cuts for the wealthy, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates will significantly increase the federal deficit. House Speaker Mike Johnson indicated minor modifications would be made, while critics argue the bill is being rushed through Congress without adequate scrutiny.
• House Republicans schedule procedural vote on Trump's bill — House Republicans have scheduled a procedural vote for 1am on Wednesday to advance President Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which aims to enact his taxation and immigration priorities. The bill includes making permanent or extending tax cuts, ending taxation of tips and overtime, funding a border wall, and mass deportations. It proposes slashing federal safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP to offset costs, which has caused division among Republicans. The bill's passage is crucial for Trump, but it faces opposition from some lawmakers concerned about its impact on Medicaid and the SALT deduction.
• House Rules Committee to Consider Omnibus Bill — The House Rules Committee is scheduled to meet on May 21, 2025, to discuss a 1,116-page omnibus bill proposed by Republicans that aims to implement significant parts of former President Trump's agenda, including cuts to Medicaid and increased logging on public lands. The bill is being advanced through a budget reconciliation process, which allows it to pass with only Republican votes in the Senate. However, there is notable division among Republicans regarding the proposed Medicaid cuts, which are unpopular among constituents.
• House passes Budget Reconciliation Bill — The House of Representatives passed the Budget Reconciliation Bill by a narrow margin of 215-214, with two Republicans voting against it and one voting present. The bill's passage is significant as it will now move to the Senate, where Republican opposition is anticipated.
• Congressional Republicans pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — Congressional Republicans narrowly passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act with a 215-214 vote. The bill aims to permanently extend tax cuts from Trump's first term and introduce new deductions for working-class families, but these benefits will expire in 2028. The bill also includes cuts to social safety net programs, potentially affecting millions of poor and disabled Americans. The legislation is expected to add $3.4 trillion to the deficit by 2034. It now moves to the US Senate for further consideration under the budget reconciliation procedure, which limits Democratic influence.
• House Passes Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" Act — The House of Representatives, controlled by Republicans, passed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" act, which enacts President Donald Trump's taxation and spending priorities. The bill includes making permanent the tax cuts from Trump's first term, increasing the standard deduction, and introducing new tax write-offs. It also allocates significant funds for mass deportations and border wall construction, imposes new fees on immigrants seeking asylum, and restricts federal courts from enforcing certain contempt citations. Additionally, it cuts funding for Medicaid and SNAP, phases out green energy incentives, and raises the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. The bill now awaits consideration in the Senate.
• House Passes Trump's Tax Bill — On May 22, 2025, the House of Representatives narrowly passed a tax bill championed by Donald Trump, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This legislation aims to make permanent the tax cuts established in 2017, which primarily benefit wealthy Americans and corporations. The bill also includes cuts to government assistance programs like Medicaid and SNAP, and ends clean energy tax credits. The bill is expected to cost the federal government $4.6 trillion in lost revenue over the next decade, while saving $1 trillion through reduced spending on assistance programs.
• House passes Trump's tax-and-spend bill — On May 22, the House of Representatives narrowly passed a tax-and-spend bill, which extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and makes significant spending reductions, particularly in Medicaid and food assistance programs. The bill passed without any Democratic support and has been criticized for potentially increasing the national debt by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) analysis indicates that the bill would leave 10.9 million more Americans uninsured by 2034. The bill now moves to the Senate, where modifications are expected.
• House passes Trump’s sweeping tax-cut bill — The House of Representatives passed a major tax-cut bill, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which aligns with Donald Trump's tax and spending priorities. The bill, passed by a narrow margin of 215-214, includes provisions for tax cuts for individuals and corporations, funding for a border wall, and new work requirements for Medicaid and SNAP. It is expected to add $2.3 trillion to the deficit. The bill now moves to the Senate, where Republicans aim to pass it by July 4th.
• House Committee Advances Bill with Steeper Medicaid Cuts — After extensive debate, the House Rules Committee agreed to advance The One Big, Beautiful Bill, which includes steeper cuts to Medicaid to gain support from far-right Republicans. These cuts are expected to leave at least 9 million people without healthcare coverage, reflecting a significant shift in healthcare policy.
• House of Representatives passes Republicans' megabill — The House of Representatives passed a significant bill by a vote of 215 to 214, with all Democrats and two Republicans voting against it. The bill includes substantial cuts to healthcare and nutrition assistance, with the Congressional Budget Office estimating that it will result in over 2.7 million households losing benefits. The bill now moves to the Senate for consideration.
• House Rules Committee Begins Hearing on The One Big, Beautiful Bill — The House Rules Committee commenced a hearing on a budget bill dubbed The One Big, Beautiful Bill, which includes significant restrictions on federal courts' authority to hold government officials in contempt for violating court orders. This bill also proposes a $3.8 trillion extension of tax cuts from 2017, primarily benefiting the wealthy and corporations, while cutting federal healthcare and food assistance programs, potentially leaving millions without coverage. The committee moved the bill forward after 22 hours of debate, aiming for a swift vote in the House.
• House Republicans Pass Bill Cutting Medicaid and Medicare — In a late-night session, House Republicans passed a bill that could remove 8 million people from Medicaid, cut Medicare spending, and add $4 trillion to the national debt. The bill also includes tax cuts for the wealthy and funds for the border wall.
• Congressional Budget Office Reports on Impact of Proposed Bill — The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported that the proposed budget bill will add $2.3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next ten years and will trigger cuts to Medicare due to the Pay-As-You-Go law. These cuts, limited by law to 4%, are expected to total approximately $490 billion from 2027 through 2034. The CBO's findings highlight the bill's potential negative impact on low-income Americans and the healthcare system.
• Proposed Cuts to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — The proposed budget bill includes cuts of about 30% to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which would be the largest cut in the program's history. This reduction is projected to cut approximately $300 billion from the program through 2034, affecting over 40 million people, including children and seniors.
• House passes Trump’s budget bill with significant cuts — The House of Representatives passed a budget bill that extends tax cuts for individuals and corporations while implementing funding cuts and new work requirements for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). These changes are expected to bar millions from receiving essential benefits, raising concerns among affected workers and advocates. The bill also includes funding for a border wall and facilities for mass deportations.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration fires nearly 600 contractors at Voice of America — The Trump administration has terminated nearly 600 contractors at Voice of America (VOA), a US-funded international news network. The firings, announced on Thursday, affected mostly journalists and some administrative staff, representing more than one-third of VOA’s workforce. This move defies a recent court order requiring the government to maintain strong news operations at VOA. Many of the dismissed journalists, who are from authoritarian countries, now face deportation as their visas are tied to their jobs. The administration cited "the government’s convenience" as the reason for the firings.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court rules against Trump on deportations — The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that Trump must halt deportations of alleged gang members without due process. Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the decision.
• Supreme Court Blocks Trump Administration's Deportation Bid Under 1798 Law — The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected the Trump administration's request to lift a temporary block on the deportation of Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. The administration sought to use the law to deport individuals accused of being gang members, but the court's decision, which included two dissenting votes, returned the case to a federal appeals court. The ruling emphasized the need for due process and reasonable time for detainees to challenge their deportation, countering the administration's proposal of a 12-hour notice period.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — W.M.M. v. Trump (a.k.a. A.A.R.P. v. Trump) (N.D. Tex.) 1:25-cv-00059 — The U.S. Supreme Court , in a per curiam decision. recognized the putative class in the Northern District of Texas and held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster” under the Fifth Amendment. The Court remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit to address “(1) all the normal preliminary injunction factors, including likelihood of success on the merits, as to the named plaintiffs' underlying habeas claims that the AEA does not authorize their removal pursuant to the President's March 14, 2025, Proclamation, and (2) the issue of what notice is due, as to the putative class's due process claims against summary removal.” The Court enjoined the government from removing putative class members pending the outcome of the litigation. Justices Alito and Thomas dissented on procedural grounds.
• Supreme Court Grants Injunction in A.A.R.P. v. Trump — On May 16, 2025, the Supreme Court granted an injunction in the case of A.A.R.P. v. Trump, which involved a challenge to a presidential proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act against members of the Tren de Aragua gang. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed the case on behalf of Venezuelan nationals detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, arguing that the executive order violated their rights. The Supreme Court's 7-2 decision granted the ACLU's request for an injunction, temporarily halting deportations under the proclamation. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.
• Supreme Court releases opinion in A.A.R.P. v. Trump (24A1007) — The Supreme Court released an official slip opinion in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. Docket number(s): 24A1007.

Supporting reports

• House Budget Committee votes down budget reconciliation bill — The House Budget Committee voted down a budget reconciliation bill by a vote of 16-21, delaying its passage. The no votes came from right-wing members who are advocating for larger spending cuts.
• House Republicans block Trump's spending bill in committee — On May 15, 2025, House Republicans, with the help of the Democratic minority, blocked Donald Trump's proposed spending bill in a key committee. The bill, which aimed to extend tax cuts, fund mass deportations, and eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, was halted by four Republican members of the Freedom Caucus who argued it did not sufficiently cut federal spending. The bill's failure to advance raises questions about Republican unity and the ability to pass the legislation by the desired deadlines set by House Speaker Mike Johnson and President Trump.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge in New Jersey to rule on Mahmoud Khalil's release — A federal judge in New Jersey is expected to rule soon on the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian permanent resident and Columbia University student, who remains in detention. Khalil was detained by the Trump administration for his pro-Palestinian activism. His case is part of a broader legal battle over the government's authority to detain and deport noncitizens for political speech. Khalil's attorneys are optimistic, given recent releases of other detained students.
• Federal judge orders release of Badar Khan Suri from custody — On May 14, 2025, a federal judge in Virginia ordered the release of Badar Khan Suri, a Georgetown University postdoctoral fellow, from immigration custody. Suri, an Indian scholar, was detained by the Trump administration as part of a campaign to deport international students over pro-Palestinian speech. The administration claims their presence harms U.S. foreign policy. This ruling follows the release of other students, Rümeysa Öztürk and Mohsen Mahdawi, who were also detained under similar circumstances.
• Federal judge orders release of Indian academic from ICE detention — On May 14, 2025, a federal judge in Virginia ordered the immediate release of Badar Khan Suri, an Indian academic detained by ICE. Suri, a Georgetown postdoctoral fellow, had been held for two months after his visa was revoked due to alleged pro-Palestinian activism. The judge ruled that the government failed to provide sufficient evidence for its claims and emphasized the public interest in protecting free speech. Suri, who faces deportation proceedings, was released without conditions or bond and returned to his family in Virginia.
• Federal judge orders release of Rümeysa Öztürk and Mohsen Mahdawi — On May 14, 2025, a federal judge ordered the release of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University student, and Mohsen Mahdawi, a Columbia University student, from immigration custody. Both were detained by the Trump administration for their pro-Palestinian activism, which the government claims is harmful to U.S. foreign policy. The judge's decision reflects skepticism about the administration's use of immigration laws to suppress political dissent.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court hears birthright citizenship case — The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a significant case challenging former President Trump's executive order aimed at deporting children born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. The case has drawn attention due to its potential impact on the interpretation of birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment. The arguments reportedly did not favor the Trump administration, with even conservative justices posing challenging questions. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for immigration policy and constitutional interpretation.
• Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump's birthright citizenship executive order — On January 21, 2025, Donald Trump signed an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. without at least one parent being a legal permanent resident or U.S. citizen. The order was immediately challenged and blocked by lower courts as unconstitutional. The case has now reached the U.S. Supreme Court as an emergency case, with the administration seeking to allow the restrictions to take partial effect. The Supreme Court's decision could have significant implications for the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and the future of birthright citizenship in the U.S.
• Supreme Court hears cases on Trump's birthright citizenship executive order — On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments regarding former President Donald Trump's executive order issued in January, which seeks to deny U.S. citizenship to children born on American soil if their parents are not citizens or permanent residents. The order challenges the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States. The administration is also contesting the power of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions against presidential orders. The Supreme Court's decision could impact the scope of presidential power and the role of federal courts in checking executive actions.
• Supreme Court to Hear Birthright Citizenship Case — The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a consolidated case challenging an executive order signed by Donald Trump that seeks to end birthright citizenship. The case involves multiple plaintiffs, including Monica, a Venezuelan asylum seeker, and two immigration advocacy groups, Asap and Casa. The executive order, which was signed shortly after Trump took office, has sparked significant legal and public debate. The outcome of the case will determine whether children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents will be granted citizenship, impacting many immigrant families.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge in Pennsylvania rules on Alien Enemies Act — On May 13, 2025, a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled that Trump can use the Alien Enemies Act to accelerate the deportation of accused Venezuelan gang members. However, the ruling stipulated that targeted migrants must be given at least three weeks' notice and a chance to challenge their removals. This decision marks a partial legal victory for the Trump administration's deportation policies.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — A.S.R. v. Trump (W.D. Pa.) 3:25-cv-00113 — Judge Stephanie Haines issued a preliminary injunction finding the presidential proclamation complies with the AEA but that the government needs to give individuals three week notice and an opportunity to be heard before removal.

Supporting reports

• Shutdown of CBP One App for Migrant Appointments — In January, the Trump administration shut down the CBP One app, which previously allowed migrants to schedule appointments with immigration officials. This move has effectively closed a legal pathway for asylum seekers to enter the United States, leaving many in limbo and increasing the risk of illegal crossings. The shutdown has been part of a broader crackdown on immigration, contributing to a tense atmosphere at the US-Mexico border and complicating the work of non-profits assisting migrants.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration ordered FBI to assist ICE with immigration enforcement — The Trump administration directed the FBI to allocate a third of its resources to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with immigration enforcement, deprioritizing white-collar crime investigations to facilitate this shift.

Supporting reports

• Federal Judge Halts Deportation of Migrants to Libya — A federal judge issued an order stopping the U.S. government's plan to deport migrants to Libya, stating that such actions would violate a court order. This came after reports of migrants being held on a military plane in Texas for hours before being returned to detention.