Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Trump claimed direct control over MAGA Inc. super PAC funds in violation of campaign finance law — President Trump stated publicly that he has "complete authority" over MAGA Inc.'s funds and can "spend it for what I want to spend it for," despite federal law prohibiting direct control of super PAC finances by candidates or officeholders. Trump's super PAC has raised over $400 million since his return to the White House—an unprecedented sum exceeding any prior midterm election war chest. The statement represents an explicit assertion of illegal control over campaign funds.

Supporting reports

• Trump pardons Binance founder Changpeng Zhao — Trump granted a pardon to Changpeng Zhao, Binance's ex-CEO and founder, who had pleaded guilty in U.S. federal court to violating the Bank Secrecy Act and failing to maintain an effective anti-money-laundering program. Zhao served a four-month jail term in 2024 before receiving the pardon in 2025. Zhao still owns 90 percent of Binance, which has been plagued by money-laundering violations and internal findings of $1.7 billion in crypto moving to Iranian entities linked to terrorism.
• Trump settles $10 billion IRS lawsuit with immunity provision — Trump used the Department of Justice to forge a settlement of his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS regarding a leak of his tax returns. The settlement grants Trump and his family immunity from IRS audits of prior tax returns and could save him approximately $100 million. A federal judge later found that because Trump controlled both sides of the case, there was no genuine adversity of parties to provide the court with jurisdiction, characterizing the arrangement as essentially a gift to Trump at taxpayer expense.
• Trump uses presidency to amass $2.2bn in personal revenue through crypto, Truth Social, and foreign deals — Donald Trump has generated approximately $2.2 billion in personal revenue during his second presidency through multiple ventures: $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency holdings (including $799 million from World Liberty Financial and $636 million from his $Trump memecoin), a $100,000-per-month Truth Social scheme offering wealthy buyers early access to presidential posts, a $10 billion IRS settlement providing tax immunity, and a $400 million plane gift from Qatar. Ethics experts and congressional Democrats have raised corruption concerns, noting that Trump has declined to place assets in a blind trust and has dismantled regulatory guardrails that previously constrained presidential conflicts of interest.
• Trump's World Liberty Financial receives $2 billion UAE investment in Binance deal — Trump's World Liberty Financial (WLF), co-founded by Trump and his sons with Steve Witkoff's family in fall 2024, received a central role in a $2 billion investment by Abu Dhabi's MGX fund (backed by the United Arab Emirates) into Binance, the world's largest crypto exchange. The deal involved MGX purchasing $2 billion of WLF's USD1 stablecoin for investment in Binance. This arrangement occurred despite Binance's 2023 guilty plea to money-laundering violations, a $4.3 billion DOJ fine, and internal findings that $1.7 billion in crypto moved through Binance to Iranian entities linked to terrorism.
• Truth Social launches $100,000-per-month early-access scheme for wealthy investors — Trump's Truth Social media business announced a new scheme offering wealthy buyers special early access to Trump's posts for a fee of $100,000 per month, dubbed Truth API. The product would provide institutional investors with high-speed access to non-public presidential communications before public release. Democratic senators Mark Warner, Elizabeth Warren, and Adam Schiff, along with ethics watchdog groups, have raised serious conflict-of-interest and corruption concerns, characterizing the arrangement as insider trading and a step toward normalizing public corruption.
• Trump accepts $400 million plane gift from Qatar — Trump circumvented the Constitution's prohibition on foreign emoluments by accepting a $400 million plane as a gift from Qatar. This arrangement, along with other wealthy foreign backing of Trump family hotel and golf deals abroad, has raised concerns among critics about violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause.
• Businessman under UK money-laundering investigation invested $100 million in Trump crypto — The New York Times reported that a businessman once under investigation in the UK for money laundering became one of the biggest buyers of tokens from Trump's cryptocurrency company, spending $100 million through a newly formed firm. As much as three-quarters of the money ultimately went to a company controlled by Trump and his sons.

Supporting reports

• Senate confirms Todd Blanche as attorney general — The US Senate voted 50-49 to confirm Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal attorney, as attorney general. Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana cast the deciding vote after two Republicans (Collins, Murkowski) opposed the nomination. Blanche had been serving in an acting capacity and faced pushback over a proposed $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization fund" and tax immunity provisions for Trump, his sons, and businesses. Cornyn and Tillis secured written assurances the fund would not proceed, enabling narrow confirmation.
• Todd Blanche confirmed as US Attorney General — The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed Todd Blanche as US Attorney General. Legal scholar Sherrilyn Ifill characterized the confirmation as signaling the collapse of the rule of law and the beginning of an accelerated program to suppress dissent. The confirmation occurred amid ongoing concerns about the use of the Justice Department as a political instrument.
• Senate confirmed Trump's former criminal defense lawyer Todd Blanche as attorney general — The Senate narrowly voted to confirm Todd Blanche, Trump's former criminal defense lawyer, as attorney general on August 8. As acting attorney general, Blanche greenlit the second indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, reauthorized the use of firing squads for death penalty executions, and signed off on a $1.776 billion "anti-weaponization fund" (now supposedly rescinded). The confirmation marks a significant shift in DOJ leadership toward Trump's personal interests.
• Senate Republicans confirm Todd Blanche as Attorney General — At 4:00 a.m. on August 9, 2026, just before a five-week recess, Senate Republicans confirmed Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to the permanent position of Attorney General of the United States. Blanche, who served as President Trump's personal criminal lawyer, becomes the top law enforcement officer of the country. Some Republicans, including 92-year-old Senate Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley, expressed enthusiasm for the nomination. Others expressed skepticism but stated they believed confirming Blanche was preferable to allowing Trump to select an alternative candidate.
• Todd Blanche sworn in as attorney general by Trump defense lawyer Emil Bove — On August 10, Todd Blanche took the oath of office as attorney general, administered by federal appeals court judge Emil Bove, a Trump defense lawyer who later became deputy at the Department of Justice. The ceremony excluded the press but included FBI director Kash Patel and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. Retired conservative judge J. Michael Luttig characterized Blanche as "the symbol of Donald Trump's corruption of the rule of law" and called his confirmation "a shameful act of acquiescence" by Senate Republicans.
• Todd Blanche sworn in as US attorney general — Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal criminal defense lawyer, was sworn in as US attorney general on Monday following a narrow 50-49 Senate confirmation vote on Saturday. Blanche had been serving as acting attorney general since April. He previously represented Trump in criminal cases before joining the administration as deputy attorney general in early 2025. His tenure has included the departure of over 200 prosecutors and agents who worked on Trump-related investigations.

Supporting reports

• Trump threatened to withdraw Blanche's nomination and resubmit it after Cornyn and Tillis leave office. — After the Blanche vote was canceled, Trump posted on Truth Social that he would "temporarily withdraw" Blanche's nomination if Cornyn and Tillis did not "do the right thing," with the intention to resubmit it after the two senators leave office. Trump attacked both senators, claiming his prior refusal to endorse them had "ended" their political careers. He praised Blanche as a potential "Greatest AG of All Time" and stated Blanche would "remain, in any event, as Acting." The post signaled Trump's intent to circumvent Senate opposition through procedural delay and attrition.
• Trump threatens to withdraw Todd Blanche's attorney general nomination — Trump threatened to withdraw his nomination of Todd Blanche as attorney general after Senators Cornyn and Tillis refused to confirm him without a written revocation of Trump's tax audit immunity and January 6th slush fund. The senators' conditional refusal to confirm created a standoff over Trump's demand to retain immunity protections and control of discretionary funds related to January 6th.
• Trump refuses to narrow tax immunity agreement despite Republican senators' written limits request — Donald Trump declined a request from Republican senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis to formally limit the scope of a controversial tax immunity agreement that grants him, his family, and related entities broad protection from IRS audits. The agreement, part of a settlement ending a lawsuit over unauthorized disclosure of Trump's tax records, includes a $1.8 billion slush fund. Trump's refusal to narrow the deal jeopardized confirmation of Todd Blanche as attorney general, though Blanche can continue serving as acting AG indefinitely under federal law.
• Trump reverses position on $1.8bn "anti-weaponization" fund and vows to revive it despite Senate opposition — Donald Trump, after initially declaring a controversial $1.8bn "anti-weaponization" fund "dead," reversed course and promised to revive it through legislation or executive action. The fund, part of a legal settlement with the DOJ over Trump's IRS lawsuit, is intended to compensate individuals Trump claims were wrongfully targeted by government. Senate Republicans John Cornyn and Thom Tillis are blocking Todd Blanche's attorney general nomination over the fund dispute, demanding written assurance the DOJ will not establish it. Trump threatened to withdraw Blanche's nomination, keep him as acting attorney general, and "push hard" for the fund anyway.
• Trump threatens to withdraw Blanche AG nomination temporarily, keep him as acting attorney general — Donald Trump announced he may "temporarily" withdraw Todd Blanche's nomination as attorney general to circumvent Republican senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, who are blocking confirmation over objections to a $1.8 billion political-weaponization compensation fund and tax immunity provisions. Trump stated he would keep Blanche as acting attorney general indefinitely under federal law until the two senators leave office in January 2027. The Senate Judiciary Committee canceled a scheduled confirmation vote on Thursday.

Supporting reports

• Stanley Woodward Jr. signs settlement agreement on behalf of the United States — Stanley E. Woodward Jr., a defense attorney who has represented Trump associates including FBI Director Kash Patel, Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro, Walt Nauta, and numerous January 6 defendants, signed the settlement agreement on behalf of the United States rather than Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. Woodward's representation of Trump's orbit creates a conflict of interest in negotiating an agreement purportedly on behalf of the government.
• Treasury Department's top lawyer Brian Morrissey resigns — Brian Morrissey, the Treasury Department's top lawyer, resigned following the announcement of the Trump administration's agreement with the IRS regarding the $1.776 billion fund.
• Treasury Department general counsel resigned amid Trump settlement announcement — Brian Morrissey, the Treasury Department's general counsel and a former clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas, resigned as the government announced a controversial settlement with Trump. Morrissey, who joined the Trump administration last year as the president's pick for the position after previously serving at the agency and DOJ during Trump's first term, did not respond to requests for comment. The Treasury Department holds responsibility for approving use of the government's judgment fund, an uncapped pot of money used to settle lawsuits.

Supporting reports

• DOJ issued order permanently barring federal government from pursuing tax claims against Trump and affiliated entities — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed an order stating that the federal government is permanently barred from pursuing tax-related claims, reviews, examinations, and appeals against Trump, his family members, and affiliated companies. The order uses language stating the US "RELEASES, WAIVES, ACQUITS, and FOREVER DISCHARGES" Trump and is "FOREVER BARRED and PRECLUDED" from pursuing monetary relief or other actions against Trump and related individuals, including family members, trusts, and subsidiaries.
• Trump granted permanent immunity from IRS tax investigations and prosecution — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed off on a provision in Trump's settlement that permanently prohibits the IRS from investigating or prosecuting the president, his family, or his businesses for pending tax claims, including a current audit that could have cost Trump more than $100 million. Former IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel stated he was unaware of any precedent where the IRS agreed in advance to permanently forgo examination of previously filed tax returns for a specific person or business.
• Department of Justice amends agreement to release Trump from all IRS prosecution and audits — Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed an amended agreement that declares the United States "RELEASES, WAIVES, ACQUITS, and FOREVER DISCHARGES" Trump, his sons, the Trump Organization, and "related or affiliated individuals" or companies from all IRS claims. The amendment asserts a blanket promise to cease all IRS audits of Trump's taxes and not to prosecute any crimes Trump, his family, businesses, or associates may have committed involving the IRS. This effectively grants Trump immunity from tax prosecution.
• Justice Department amends settlement agreement to permanently bar IRS from auditing Trump's tax returns — The Department of Justice, through acting attorney general Todd Blanche, added an addendum to a settlement agreement on May 20, 2026, permanently barring the IRS from auditing Donald Trump's past tax returns, as well as those of his family, company, and related entities for all filings prior to the agreement. This amendment was appended to a controversial $1.776 billion compensation fund created to settle Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS and other government claims. The provision was posted quietly to the DOJ website the day after the fund's announcement and drew immediate criticism from Senate Democrats during Blanche's testimony.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration considers settling $10bn IRS lawsuit with $1.7bn compensation fund for allies including January 6 rioters — The Trump administration is reportedly negotiating to settle Trump's $10bn lawsuit against the IRS by establishing a $1.7bn compensation fund using the Treasury Department's Judgment Fund. The fund would compensate individuals Trump claims were wrongfully targeted by the Biden administration, including over 1,500 January 6 rioters. The settlement would also include a public IRS apology and waiver of audits on Trump, his family, and businesses. A federal judge has appointed attorneys to examine whether a genuine legal controversy exists, raising concerns about self-dealing and potential DOJ manipulation.
• Trump withdrew IRS lawsuit; DOJ established $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" from Judgment Fund — Attorneys for President Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization filed notice voluntarily dismissing a $10 billion IRS lawsuit in federal court in Miami with prejudice. In exchange, the Justice Department announced creation of a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" drawn from the federal Judgment Fund to issue apologies and monetary relief to people claiming government "weaponization" or "lawfare." A five-member commission appointed by the Attorney General will decide beneficiaries; the President can remove any member. Quarterly reports go to the Attorney General, not the public. The fund must cease processing claims by December 2028.
• Trump settles IRS lawsuit and establishes $1.8bn anti-weaponization fund — Trump settled his lawsuit against the IRS over the leaking of his tax information by a whistleblower, abandoning his $10bn damages claim in exchange for a financial agreement that allowed him to establish a $1.776bn "anti-weaponization fund." Federal Judge Kathleen Williams approved the settlement on May 18. Critics and Democrats argue the fund functions as a "slush fund" designed to distribute taxpayer dollars to Trump's political allies, including those convicted of violence during the January 6 Capitol riot, whom Trump subsequently pardoned.
• Justice Department announces Anti-Weaponization Fund settlement with Trump entities — The Department of Justice announced establishment of "The Anti-Weaponization Fund" as part of a settlement agreement in President Donald J. Trump v. Internal Revenue Service. The fund, capitalized at $1.776 billion from the judgment fund, will process claims from individuals alleging weaponization or lawfare by government. Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization agreed to drop their lawsuit with prejudice and withdraw administrative claims related to tax-return leaks, the Mar-a-Lago raid, and Russia-collusion investigations in exchange for a formal apology (but no monetary damages to them personally) and creation of the fund. The fund will cease operations by December 1, 2028.
• DOJ establishes $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" for January 6 defendants and MAGA loyalists — The Department of Justice created a $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded "Anti-Weaponization Fund" designated to provide financial support to January 6th insurrectionists and MAGA loyalists. The fund represents a direct allocation of federal resources to individuals convicted or charged in connection with the Capitol attack, effectively using public money to benefit political allies and those involved in the assault on the Capitol.
• DOJ establishes $1.776 billion fund for January 6 defendants and Trump allies — The Department of Justice, under Attorney General Todd Blanche, announced the creation of a $1.776 billion fund designated "for victims of lawfare and weaponization" to provide monetary relief and formal apologies to claimants. The fund will be administered by a five-member Commission appointed by the Attorney General, with one member chosen in consultation with congressional leadership. The President retains authority to remove any Commission member. The fund is expected to provide payouts to individuals convicted or charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol breach and Trump administration officials.
• DOJ announced Anti-Weaponization Fund eligibility may include January 6 defendants — ABC News and TIME reported before the fund announcement that the proposed $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund could include people charged in connection with January 6. Reuters notes that "weaponization" and "lawfare" are terms the President and allies have used to describe criminal cases arising from the Capitol attack. The Hill reports that several convicted January 6 defendants have pending civil suits. DOJ has not publicly released eligibility criteria or named beneficiaries.
• DOJ announces $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" as Trump settlement — Trump's Justice Department officially announced the $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" as part of a settlement with Trump in his lawsuit against the Treasury Department and IRS over the leaking of his tax returns. The fund will be overseen by a commission appointed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, whose members Trump can fire without cause, and will be made available in secret to those claiming wrongful government targeting, potentially including those Trump pardoned for January 6 involvement.
• Trump administration dismisses $10bn IRS lawsuit and establishes $1.776bn secretive compensation fund — The Justice Department announced creation of a $1.776bn "Anti-Weaponization Fund" as part of an agreement in which Trump and his sons dropped a $10bn lawsuit against the IRS. The fund, overseen by five commissioners (four appointed by the attorney general and removable by Trump), will compensate Trump allies with minimal transparency—quarterly reports go only to the attorney general and are confidential. Trump and his sons receive formal apologies but no monetary compensation. Democrats and watchdog groups condemned the arrangement as a slush fund funneling taxpayer dollars to political allies.
• Department of Justice announces $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" to compensate Trump and associates — The Department of Justice, under Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, announced the creation of a $1.776 billion fund purportedly to compensate victims of alleged "weaponization" of the Justice Department under former President Biden. The fund was established following Trump's withdrawal of a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS after a contractor leaked his tax information. Judge Kathleen Williams dismissed the suit, noting no legal settlement existed. The fund is controlled by five administrators, four chosen by Blanche and one in consultation with Congress, all removable by Trump without cause. Distributions are confidential and overseen only by the DOJ. Remaining funds after December 2028 revert to Trump's chosen federal account.
• Creation of $1.776 billion compensation fund for Trump allies with minimal oversight — The Department of Justice announced creation of a $1.776 billion compensation fund on May 19–20, 2026, to settle Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS and other government claims. The fund is administered by five officials subject to at-will removal by the president, operates with minimal transparency requirements, and is not obligated to publicly disclose recipients or justifications for awards. Senate Democrats criticized the arrangement as an "outrageous, unprecedented slush fund." Acting attorney general Blanche testified that no limitations exist on who may seek compensation, including those convicted of assaulting police on January 6, though he stated Trump and his sons would not receive direct compensation.
• DOJ announces creation of Anti-Weaponization Fund — The Department of Justice announced the establishment of a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" aimed at compensating individuals it describes as victims of lawfare under former President Joe Biden. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the fund is a lawful process for victims to seek redress. However, the fund is not a legal settlement related to Trump's dropped lawsuit against the IRS, and it grants Trump significant control over the distribution of taxpayer money without oversight.
• Justice Department announced $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund from Trump IRS lawsuit settlement — The Justice Department announced a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund" created as part of a settlement of President Trump's lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns. Trump, his two adult sons, and the Trump Organization dropped the suit and received a formal apology but no direct monetary payment. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal defense attorney, established the fund and will handpick the five-member commission deciding eligibility and payouts. The process is largely shielded from court review, and eligibility criteria remain undefined, with Blanche stating "anybody can apply."

Supporting reports

• Trump negotiates $1.7 billion fund to compensate allies for alleged DOJ weaponization — Trump is in talks to drop his $10 billion IRS lawsuit in exchange for the government establishing a $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded account to compensate Trump's allies who claim they were harmed by the Biden administration's alleged weaponization of the Department of Justice. Eligible recipients would include nearly 1,600 people convicted of crimes related to the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack, whom Trump pardoned or commuted shortly after taking office in January 2025. While Trump himself will likely be barred from direct payments, entities associated with him will not be.
• Trump DOJ creates $1.7 billion compensation fund for January 6 defendants and Trump allies — The Trump administration is expected to settle Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS by creating a $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded compensation fund to pay individuals and entities claiming wrongful targeting by the Biden administration. The fund would compensate approximately 1,600 January 6 Capitol attack defendants and potentially Trump-associated entities. Trump would retain authority to remove commission members without cause, and the commission would operate with minimal disclosure requirements or oversight of its decision-making process for distributing over $1 billion in public funds.
• Trump administration considers $1.7 billion compensation fund for allies investigated under Biden — The Trump administration is reportedly considering a $1.7 billion fund to compensate President Trump's allies and others who claim they were harmed by Justice Department investigations during the Biden administration. The fund could cover legal costs for people in Trump's orbit and potentially extend to some of the nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack. The administration has discussed modeling the program on past federal settlement funds, with possible payments through the Treasury Department's Judgment Fund. The proposal has not been finalized or approved.
• White House and DOJ explore settlement of Trump's $10 billion IRS lawsuit — The New York Times reported that the White House and Justice Department are exploring a settlement in Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS for releasing his tax returns. ABC News reported that Trump is expected to settle in exchange for launching a $1.7 billion compensation fund for his allies, including those pardoned for Jan. 6 involvement, with a Trump-controlled commission overseeing distribution and recipient identities potentially kept private. The settlement would use taxpayer funds to reward political allies.

Supporting reports

• Trump offered mass pardons to White House staff before leaving office — The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has repeatedly offered mass pardons to White House staff, initially stating he would pardon "everyone who has come within 200 feet of the Oval Office." The offer was made to encourage staff to conduct themselves without concern about future prosecution for illegal conduct. Trump indicated he would host a news conference to announce mass pardons before leaving office, with the radius of the pardon offer reportedly expanding over time.
• Trump promises mass pardons to staff before leaving office — The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has privately promised mass presidential pardons to his staff before leaving office, stating in a private meeting that he would "pardon everyone who has come within 200 feet of the Oval." The White House did not deny the promise but claimed the president was joking, with press secretary Karoline Leavitt stating "the president's pardon power is absolute."

Supporting reports

• Trump grants clemency to dozens convicted of fraud, including billionaires and political allies — President Trump has pardoned or commuted sentences for dozens of people convicted of white-collar crimes, particularly fraud offenses. Notable recipients include former Puerto Rico governor Wanda Vázquez Garced (campaign finance violation), Venezuelan businessman Julio Herrera Velutini (wire fraud, whose daughter donated $2.5m to pro-Trump PAC), and others convicted of money laundering, bank fraud, and wire fraud. An analysis by House Democrats found Trump's pardons have deprived victims of $1.3bn in restitution and fines. The pardons occur as Trump simultaneously accuses Democratic-run states of fraud and has attempted to cut federal funding to those states.
• No civil rights investigation initiated by DOJ into fatal shooting of Alex Pretti — Despite the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by federal agents during immigration enforcement in Minneapolis, the U.S. Justice Department has not initiated a civil rights investigation, a departure from recent standard practice in federal officer-involved shootings. Trump stated he was awaiting results of an internal DHS investigation, which is conducted by the parent agency of the agents involved, raising questions about independent oversight and accountability.

Supporting reports

• Attorney General Pam Bondi demands Minnesota surrender voter rolls, social program records, and policy changes — On January 24, 2026, Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Governor Tim Walz demanding that Minnesota turn over voter rolls for federal inspection, provide records on social programs including Medicaid and food assistance for federal investigation, and end policies preventing local coordination with immigration enforcement. State officials characterized the letter as a "ransom note" and an attempt at coercion and extortion designed to force compliance with federal immigration enforcement priorities.
• Attorney General Bondi tied voter roll access to federal violence in Minnesota — Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz suggesting he could "bring back law and order to Minnesota" if he handed over the state's voter rolls to the Department of Justice. Bondi explicitly tied the administration's violence in the state to its determination to obtain voters' personal data before the 2026 election. Minnesota has voted for the Democratic candidate in the past three presidential elections, but Trump insists he won the state each time.
• Pam Bondi demands Minnesota voter rolls, public assistance data, and sanctuary policy repeal — US Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz demanding access to the state's voter rolls, public assistance recipient data, and repeal of sanctuary city policies. The demand was framed as part of immigration enforcement but included no evidence of non-citizen voter fraud in Minnesota. State election officials and legal experts characterized the request as coercive and pretextual, noting it violates state and federal law protecting voter privacy and has no connection to immigration enforcement.
• Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Minnesota officials conditioning ICE's withdrawal on the state turning over its voter database to the Trump administration. — Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Minnesota officials stating that ICE would leave the state if Minnesota allowed the Civil Rights Division of DOJ to "access voter rolls to confirm that MN's voter registration practices comply with federal law." The letter framed this as a "common sense request" to "better guarantee free and fair elections and boost confidence in the rule of law." Senator Chris Murphy characterized this as evidence that "the Trump admin is creating this mayhem, particularly in cities in swing states, in order to take control of elections" and stated "They are trying to trade the presence of ICE and the murder and mayhem they are causing for control of Minnesota's elections."
• Attorney General Pam Bondi demands Minnesota enforce immigration law and produce welfare and voter roll data — US Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Governor Walz on January 26, 2026, accusing Minnesota officials of refusing to enforce the rule of law and demanding they support ICE operations. Bondi pressed Walz to produce information about the state's welfare programs and voter rolls, citing unsubstantiated federal claims that Democratic lawmakers allowed these systems to be manipulated or subject to welfare fraud. Bondi framed compliance as necessary to "bring back law and order to Minnesota."
• Attorney General Bondi requested voter rolls from Minnesota — Attorney General Pam Bondi sent a letter to Governor Tim Walz on Saturday, shortly after Pretti's killing, suggesting that Walz could "restore the rule of law" in Minnesota by handing over the state's voter rolls. The request was framed as unrelated to voter files but appeared to be connected to Trump's claims that the election was rigged.
• Attorney General Bondi letter linking ICE surge to demands for voter data, welfare records, and sanctuary policy repeal — Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a letter explicitly conditioning the end of Operation Metro Surge on three unrelated demands: access to voter registration records, welfare program data, and repeal of sanctuary policies. Minnesota's lawyers characterize this as an extortion attempt and argue it demonstrates the Trump administration is using armed federal presence to coerce policy changes rather than conduct legitimate immigration enforcement, violating the 10th Amendment and constitutional structure.

Supporting reports

• ProPublica reports Deputy AG Blanche held crypto investments while ending investigations — ProPublica reported that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche held more than $150,000 in crypto investments when he issued a memo one month into his tenure to end investigations into crypto companies, dealers, and exchanges initiated during the Biden administration. A former White House ethics lawyer called the situation "an obvious conflict of interest."

Supporting reports

• Democrats release new Epstein photos ahead of DoJ transparency deadline — Democrats on the House oversight committee released a new batch of photos from Jeffrey Epstein's estate as the Department of Justice faces a deadline to release its files related to Epstein under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The images, which include undated photos of prominent figures and text from Vladimir Nabokov’s novel "Lolita" written on a woman's body, aim to maintain pressure on the Trump administration. The Justice Department has less than 48 hours to comply with the law, which was signed by Trump after bipartisan support ensured its passage.
• Ghislaine Maxwell files habeas petition to vacate conviction — Ghislaine Maxwell, serving a 20-year sentence for sex-trafficking crimes, filed a habeas petition in federal court to vacate her conviction, citing "substantial new evidence" from various sources that she claims supports her argument of an unfair trial. The petition alleges that exculpatory information was withheld and false testimony was presented during her trial. This filing is Maxwell's latest attempt to overturn her conviction following several unsuccessful appeals since her 2021 conviction.
• Trump administration faces Epstein Files Transparency Act deadline with incomplete DOJ redaction process — The Trump administration's Department of Justice faces a less-than-48-hour deadline to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law on November 19, 2025. Internal sources report that DOJ attorneys have been processing over 1,000 documents each since Thanksgiving with only four pages of redaction guidance, raising concerns about over-redaction, errors, and potential exposure of sensitive information. Legal experts warn the rushed review could compromise the transparency mandate.
• Senate Majority Leader Schumer called DOJ Epstein release a cover-up — Senator Chuck Schumer stated that the Trump administration violated the law by releasing only partial Epstein files instead of all documents within the 30-day statutory window. He accused the DOJ, Trump, and Bondi of hiding the truth and covering up Trump's past, and announced Senate Democrats are working with victim attorneys and legal experts to assess what documents are being withheld.
• DOJ released partial Epstein files in violation of federal law — Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche released only a portion of the Epstein documents on the statutory deadline, with heavy redactions, violating federal law requiring full release with minimal redactions to protect victim identity only. The law mandated all documents be released within 30 days of enactment; DOJ interpreted this as permission to release documents over several weeks. Senate Democrats and House Judiciary members announced they are examining legal options to compel full compliance.
• DOJ released Epstein files with initial photo removal and restoration — The Department of Justice met a court-ordered deadline on December 19 to release Jeffrey Epstein investigation materials, including a searchable photo database. Officials initially removed a widely-circulated photograph showing Trump with Epstein from the database; after immediate public criticism, the department restored the photo on Saturday, attributing the removal to technical issues. Documents were released with heavy redactions that victim advocates said protected prominent names inconsistently.
• DOJ Releases Redacted Epstein Files, Restores Trump Photo — The Department of Justice released heavily redacted materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, meeting a court-ordered deadline. Initially, a photograph of Trump with Epstein was removed from the database but was restored after public criticism, with officials citing technical issues. The redactions have been criticized for inconsistently protecting prominent names, raising concerns about transparency and accountability.
• Department of Justice releases heavily redacted Epstein files under court-ordered deadline — The Department of Justice released a large tranche of documents from its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on Friday, December 19, 2025, in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act signed by President Trump on November 19. The release included photographs and investigative materials dating back to 2006, though significant portions were redacted, including identifying details of over 1,200 victims and family members. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche acknowledged the redactions and indicated additional documents would be released on a rolling basis. Congressional Democrats and some Republicans criticized the release as failing to fully comply with the law's requirement to disclose all unclassified materials.
• Department of Justice releases partial Epstein files in violation of congressional mandate — The Department of Justice released several hundred thousand documents related to Jeffrey Epstein on Friday, but Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the release would not include the full set of files held by DOJ, contrary to the Epstein Files Transparency Act signed into law on November 19, 2025. The law required release of all unclassified materials within 30 days. Congressional Democrats and legal experts immediately threatened legal action, accusing the administration of violating federal law and obstructing transparency.
• DOJ partially releases Epstein investigative files, missing statutory deadline — The Department of Justice released investigative documents on Jeffrey Epstein on December 19, 2025, under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandated full disclosure by that date. However, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the release was incomplete and stated additional documents would be released over subsequent weeks. Lawyers representing Epstein survivors condemned the partial release, arguing the DOJ had "dragged its feet" for 18 years and repeatedly failed victims, while some survivors expressed mixed emotions—validation that obstruction was now public, but also devastation over the incomplete accounting.
• House Democrats release Epstein estate photos ahead of DOJ transparency deadline — House Oversight Committee Democrats released a batch of photographs from Jeffrey Epstein's estate on Thursday, including images with Lolita passages written on women's bodies, photos of Bill Gates, Noam Chomsky, and other public figures. The release occurs as the Trump administration faces a 48-hour deadline under the Epstein Files Transparency Act to release DOJ files. The administration had initially refused to release additional files despite campaign promises, then reversed course when bipartisan support became evident.
• Justice Department misses congressionally mandated deadline for Epstein files release — The Trump administration's Justice Department failed to meet the December 19, 2025 deadline mandated by the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act to release all investigative files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Although some files were disclosed by the deadline, subsequent releases represented only a fraction of the estimated 2+ million documents in the department's possession. Victims' advocates and the act's co-sponsors have called for a special master to oversee compliance; the Justice Department opposed the request in court filings.
• Trump administration fails to fully release Epstein files by congressional deadline — The Trump administration released only partial Epstein investigative documents on Friday, falling short of the congressionally mandated full release required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act deadline of December 19. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Representative Ro Khanna criticized the incomplete release, with Khanna calling for impeachment proceedings against Attorney General Pam Bondi. The administration cited the need for additional victim-protection redactions, while Democrats argued the law required written explanation for withheld documents within 15 days.
• Trump DOJ fails to comply with Congressional deadline for Epstein Files Transparency Act — The Trump Department of Justice missed the December 19, 2025 statutory deadline mandated by Congress's Epstein Files Transparency Act to disclose all investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein. One month after the deadline, DOJ has released only approximately 12,285 documents (125,575 pages) while acknowledging over 2 million additional documents remain under review. Congressmen Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie requested a federal judge appoint a special master to compel compliance; DOJ opposed the request.
• Trump justice department releases limited, heavily redacted Epstein files in apparent violation of transparency law — The Trump justice department released a limited, heavily redacted trove of Jeffrey Epstein investigative files on Friday, December 19, falling short of the Epstein Files Transparency Act's requirement for near-complete disclosure by that date. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the department would release documents in tranches over weeks rather than all at once. Subsequently, at least 16 files disappeared from the department's public webpage without explanation, including an image containing a photograph of Trump with Epstein. Lawmakers from both parties condemned the release as non-compliant with law.
• Trump's DOJ missed December 19 deadline for releasing Epstein files under EFTA — Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA) in 2025, which Trump signed into law, mandating the Department of Justice release investigative files by December 19, 2025. The deadline passed with the DOJ releasing only a fraction of required disclosures. Legal experts including Mitchell Garabedian, Spencer Kuvin, and Neama Rahmani told the Guardian that enforcement mechanisms are weak, the special master route has failed, and future options include court intervention, FOIA litigation, and congressional oversight, though complications abound given the DOJ itself is the target of enforcement.
• Department of Justice released only a fraction of Epstein files required by law on December 19, 2025 — On December 19, 2025, the deadline established by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the Department of Justice released only a partial set of materials despite the law's requirement to release all unclassified records. Missing from the release were FBI interviews with survivors and internal Justice Department memos about charging decisions. The release was heavily redacted, with entire pages blacked out, and focused disproportionately on former President Bill Clinton rather than other named individuals.
• Trump administration fails to meet December 19 deadline for releasing Epstein files — The Trump administration failed to meet the legal deadline of December 19 established by Congress for releasing the Epstein files. The failure to comply with the congressional mandate represented a violation of the law and an assertion of executive power over legislative authority.
• Trump Justice Department fails to comply with Epstein Files Transparency Act deadline — The Trump Justice Department, led by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, announced it will not release all unclassified Epstein-related records by the statutory 30-day deadline mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Instead, officials stated they will release "several hundred thousand" documents today with additional materials possibly arriving weeks or months later. The statute explicitly requires all unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and their trafficking operation be made publicly available in searchable and downloadable form within 30 days of enactment. The staggered disclosure approach violates the law's clear mandate.

Supporting reports

• Trump commutes George Santos sentence after few months served — Trump commuted the seven-year sentence of expelled House member George Santos, who pleaded guilty in 2024 to fraud and identity theft charges and had served only a few months in prison. Legal experts criticized the commutation as occurring without Santos showing remorse and as part of Trump's pattern of using clemency to reward political allies rather than deserving defendants.

Supporting reports

• Trump pardoned dozens of election-denying loyalists and fake electors — Trump pardoned dozens of election-denying loyalists and fake electors involved in plans to overturn the 2020 presidential election on November 9, including lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, ex-chief of staff Mark Meadows, and conspiracy theorist Sidney Powell. The pardons cover only federal charges and do not protect against state charges.
• Trump issues federal pardons for 77 people involved in 2020 election interference scheme — President Trump pardoned 77 people, including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis, and John Eastman, for their roles in efforts to overturn the 2020 election through fake elector schemes and legal challenges. The pardons, announced via X by pardon attorney Ed Martin on November 10, are "full, complete and unconditional" but apply only to federal charges, leaving state-level prosecutions intact. Trump's proclamation characterized the prosecutions as "a grave national injustice" and framed the pardons as part of "national reconciliation."
• Trump issued broad pardon for 2020 election-related conduct — Justice Department pardon attorney Ed Martin posted a document on social media revealing that Trump issued a sweeping pardon covering "all United States citizens for conduct relating to the advice, creation, organization, execution, submission, support, voting, activities, participation in, or advocacy for or of any slate or proposed slate of Presidential Electors" in connection with the 2020 election, as well as conduct related to efforts to expose alleged voting fraud and vulnerabilities.
• Trump pardons eight individuals involved in 2020 election overturn efforts — Trump pardoned eight people who attempted to help him overturn the 2020 election results: Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, Ken Chesebro, Christina Bobb, Kelli Ward, and Jenna Ellis. The pardons come days before a November 14 deadline for Georgia prosecutors to appoint a replacement for disqualified prosecutor Fani Willis.
• Trump grants preemptive pardons to 70+ MAGA allies including Giuliani and Meadows — Trump granted preemptive pardons to more than 70 MAGA allies, including ex-lawyer Rudy Giuliani and ex-chief of staff Mark Meadows, who worked on efforts to create fake electors to subvert Trump's 2020 election loss. The pardons were announced by pardon attorney Ed Martin via social media. None of the recipients face federal charges, though some have been charged or scrutinized by state authorities for election subversion efforts. Legal experts characterized the action as corrupt, pay-to-play, and authoritarian.
• Trump signed pardons for 77 election subversion conspirators — Trump signed pardons for 77 individuals involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, and fake electors who had already pleaded guilty. The pardons were signed Friday and announced Sunday night during government shutdown media coverage. The timing and announcement strategy obscured the action from public attention during competing news cycles.

Supporting reports

• Trump pardons Changpeng Zhao, Binance founder, amid crypto business ties — Trump pardoned Changpeng Zhao, founder and largest shareholder of Binance cryptocurrency exchange, who pleaded guilty in 2023 to violating anti-money-laundering laws and served a four-month sentence. Binance had inked a $2 billion investment deal with Trump family crypto firm World Liberty Financial, expected to yield tens of millions yearly to the Trump family. Trump admitted in a 60 Minutes interview he did not know who Zhao was, claiming he heard it was a "Biden witch-hunt." Legal experts characterized the pardon as pay-to-play and corrupt.
• 60 Minutes investigates Trump crypto empire and Binance pardon — According to Zach Guzman of Coinage Media, CBS's 60 Minutes is planning to release an investigation into the Trump family's growing cryptocurrency empire and Trump's controversial pardon of Binance founder CZ. The investigation focuses on World Liberty Financial, the Trump family's crypto project that launched a digital dollar (USD1) and is shopping it around to various entities. Binance inked a deal to accept $2 billion in USD1, which would allow the Trump company to collect interest payments potentially worth billions of dollars annually. The timing of the Binance deal and Trump's subsequent pardon of CZ raises questions about potential quid pro quo arrangements.

Supporting reports

• Trump commutes George Santos's prison sentence — On Friday, October 18, 2025, President Trump announced via Truth Social that he had commuted the sentence of disgraced former congressman George Santos, who was serving a federal prison sentence for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. Santos, who had pleaded guilty and was less than three months into a seven-year sentence, was released immediately. In a CNN interview on Sunday, Santos called the sentence "disproportionate" but acknowledged receiving "a large slice of humble pie" and declined to commit to paying restitution.
• Trump commutes George Santos's seven-year fraud sentence after less than three months served — Donald Trump commuted the seven-year, three-month prison sentence of disgraced former congressman George Santos for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft on October 18, 2025, after Santos had served fewer than three months at Fairton federal prison in New Jersey. Santos was released the same evening. The commutation followed a public campaign by Republican allies including Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert, and Anna Paulina Luna. Trump acknowledged Santos as "somewhat of a 'rogue'" but stated many similar offenders serve shorter sentences. The action has drawn criticism from Democrats and some Republicans as an abuse of presidential power.
• Trump commutes sentence of George Santos in federal fraud case — Donald Trump announced on Friday, October 18, 2025, that he had commuted the sentence of George Santos, the disgraced former New York Republican representative who had been sentenced to 87 months in prison in April 2025 for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. Santos was released from Federal Correctional Institution Fairton in New Jersey hours after the commutation. Trump's action followed pressure from Republican allies, notably Marjorie Taylor Greene, and came after Santos published a letter in a local newspaper appealing for clemency.

Supporting reports

• Bill Pulte, as FHFA director, referred NY AG Letitia James to DOJ, leading to her indictment on bank fraud charges. — Bill Pulte, serving as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, referred New York Attorney General Letitia James to the Department of Justice following her legal pursuits of Trump. James was subsequently indicted on bank fraud charges. Pulte, a millennial millionaire with a history of targeting family members and Trump's perceived enemies, has transformed his position into a platform to denigrate Trump's political opponents. In addition to the James referral, Pulte has also probed Senator Adam Schiff and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, both of whom are now under federal criminal investigation. Pulte's official role is to ensure the soundness of the mortgage market, not to investigate political figures.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration directs DOJ to investigate George Soros and Open Society Foundations — The Trump administration, through Attorney General Pam Bondi and President Trump, ordered a Department of Justice investigation into billionaire philanthropist George Soros and the Open Society Foundations (OSF), alleging without evidence that they finance "leftwing terrorism" and "professional anarchists and agitators." The New York Times reported the DOJ had directed prosecutors to consider possible charges under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Trump named Soros and Reid Hoffman as targets in the Oval Office, stating "Soros, he's at the top of everything." Soros's office denied all allegations as "100% false."

Supporting reports

• Justice Department Public Integrity Section decimated — The number of attorneys in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, which investigates corruption cases against politicians and police officers, has dropped from 36 to two since Trump's term began in January. The lawyers have quit under pressure, resigned in protest, or been reassigned.

Supporting reports

• Trump issues memorandum directing attorney general to investigate ActBlue for alleged foreign contributions — President Trump issued a presidential memorandum on Thursday directing the attorney general to investigate ActBlue, the largest Democratic online fundraising platform, for alleged "straw," "dummy," and foreign contributions to U.S. political candidates. The memo targets unsubstantiated claims circulated by right-wing figures and lawmakers. ActBlue's leadership stated the organization anticipated this action and characterized it as part of efforts to weaken Democratic fundraising capacity ahead of midterm elections.
• Trump issued memorandum directing investigation into unlawful straw donor and foreign contributions in American elections — President Trump issued a presidential memorandum directing the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, to investigate allegations of unlawful use of online fundraising platforms to make "straw" or "dummy" contributions or foreign contributions to political candidates and committees. The memorandum cites press reports and congressional investigations alleging that platforms like ActBlue have facilitated schemes to launder excessive and prohibited contributions by breaking down large contributions into smaller ones attributed to other individuals, potentially without their knowledge or consent, and that foreign nationals have misused such platforms. The Attorney General is directed to report findings within 180 days.
• White House issues fact sheet on presidential memorandum directing investigation of straw donor and foreign contributions — The White House published a fact sheet on April 24, 2025, describing a Presidential Memorandum signed by President Trump directing the Attorney General to investigate allegations of unlawful "straw donor" and foreign contributions to U.S. political candidates through online fundraising platforms, particularly ActBlue. The memorandum cites congressional investigations and claims of fraud schemes, including donations from foreign IP addresses during the 2024 election cycle. The fact sheet asserts that ActBlue maintained lax verification standards and that state attorneys general have opened related investigations.
• Trump directed DOJ to investigate ActBlue — President Trump ordered the Department of Justice to investigate ActBlue, the fundraising platform used by Democratic candidates and causes, citing unsubstantiated claims that the platform accepts straw and foreign donations. The order targets Democratic fundraising infrastructure and reflects Trump's repeated assertions, made without evidence, about ActBlue's alleged acceptance of improper contributions.

Supporting reports

• Trump demands Harvard lose tax-exempt status — After Harvard defied the Trump administration's attempt to take over the school, Trump posted on social media demanding Harvard lose its tax-exempt status, calling it a "Political Entity" pushing "political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting 'Sickness.'" Trump stated that "Tax Exempt Status is totally contingent on acting in the PUBLIC INTEREST."
• IRS plans to revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status — The Internal Revenue Service is planning to revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status following Trump's public demand. Law professor Sam Brunson noted this action is illegal, citing a 1998 law explicitly prohibiting the President from directly or indirectly requesting the IRS start or end an audit or investigation of a taxpayer. Brunson stated Harvard has not violated its tax-exempt status requirements. The Wall Street Journal editorial board noted the Supreme Court has repeatedly held the government may not use federal benefits or funds to coerce parties to surrender constitutional rights.
• IRS Plans to Revoke Harvard's Tax-Exempt Status — The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is reportedly planning to revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status following the institution's defiance of the Trump administration's directives. Legal experts have noted that this action would be illegal, as the President cannot direct the IRS to initiate such investigations.

Supporting reports

• US Department of Justice drops corruption case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams — US District Judge Dale Ho dismissed the Department of Justice's corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams on April 2, 2025, with prejudice (meaning charges cannot be refiled). The dismissal followed weeks of controversy over the Trump administration pressuring prosecutors to drop charges in apparent exchange for Adams' cooperation on immigration enforcement. Judge Ho noted the arrangement "smacks of a bargain" and violated prosecutorial independence norms. Senior prosecutors had resigned rather than comply with orders to dismiss the case.
• DOJ dismisses corruption case against NYC Mayor Eric Adams — At the request of Trump's Justice Department, a federal judge on April 2 dismissed the corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams with prejudice, meaning the charges cannot be brought against him again. The judge wrote that "everything here smacks of a bargain: dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions."
• Federal agents arrest Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan — In April 2025, federal agents arrested Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan, alleging she "intentionally misdirected" federal agents away from a Mexican immigrant appearing in state court. FBI Director Kash Patel personally announced Dugan's arrest before an affidavit had been filed. After the arrest, Attorney General Pam Bondi stated the Trump administration was "sending a very strong message" to judges who "think they are beyond and above the law."

Supporting reports

• Willkie Farr & Gallagher reaches settlement with Trump administration — Willkie Farr & Gallagher agreed on Tuesday to commit $100 million in pro bono work to causes championed by Trump and to cease race-based hiring practices. The firm, which employs Doug Emhoff (Kamala Harris's husband) and represented Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss in their successful defamation suit against Rudy Giuliani, settled to avoid a threatened executive order. Emhoff had advised the firm not to settle.
• Milbank LLP reaches settlement with Trump administration — Milbank LLP agreed on Wednesday to commit $100 million in pro bono work to settle with the Trump administration and avoid a threatened executive order. The firm recently hired Neal Katyal, a former acting solicitor general and prominent Supreme Court litigator who wrote a book arguing for Trump's impeachment, making it a likely target.
• Trump administration coerces law firms into settlements to avoid executive orders targeting political opponents — The Trump administration has pressured multiple major law firms into settlements by threatening executive orders that could harm their business. Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Milbank LLP each agreed to commit $100 million in pro bono work and accept restrictions on hiring practices. Earlier, Paul Weiss, Skadden Arps, and others settled similarly. The targeting appears aimed at firms representing Trump's political rivals or their associates, including those who represented election workers who sued Rudy Giuliani and those assisting Jack Smith. Some lawyers have quit in protest; others warn the settlements embolden further retaliation.
• Coalition of 21 state AGs warned law firms against surrendering to Trump threats — Delaware AG Kathy Jennings formed a coalition of 21 state AGs who signed a letter sent to the 100 largest law firms in the US. The letter warned firms not to surrender to Trump's threats and stated that recent Trump administration actions targeting law firms and attorneys, plus calls for impeachment of federal judges, represent a clear threat to the justice system. The letter cited the Paul, Weiss law firm's acquiescence to Trump's demands as an example of the chilling effect.
• Willkie Farr and Gallgher and Milbank LLP reach preemptive settlement deals with Trump administration — Two additional major law firms, Willkie Farr and Gallgher and Milbank LLP, reached preemptive settlement agreements with the Trump administration in early April to avoid being targeted by executive orders. These deals followed Skadden's March 28 settlement and occurred as other firms (Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, WilmerHale) successfully obtained court injunctions blocking most provisions of the administration's orders.
• Trump announces $100 million pro bono legal services deal — Trump on April 1 said he reached an agreement with a law firm to provide at least $100 million in pro bono legal services to support the president's agenda. Among the partners of the firm is former first gentleman Doug Emhoff. The arrangement raises questions about conflicts of interest and the use of private legal resources for presidential purposes.
• Trump announces second $100 million pro bono legal services deal — Trump on April 2 announced another deal with a law firm to provide $100 million in pro bono legal services. The second arrangement within days raises questions about the scope and purpose of private legal support for presidential activities.

Supporting reports

• Trump issues executive orders targeting Perkins Coie and Covington and Burling law firms — Trump issued executive orders targeting the law firms Perkins Coie and Covington and Burling, similar in structure to the Paul Weiss order. Perkins Coie was targeted over its ties to a lawyer who worked with Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign; Covington and Burling was targeted for representing former special counsel Jack Smith in litigation against the administration.
• Trump issues executive orders penalizing law firms Covington & Burling and Perkins Coie — President Trump issued executive orders targeting three major law firms—Covington & Burling, Perkins Coie, and Paul Weiss Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison—barring them from federal buildings, restricting agency interaction, and revoking security clearances from some lawyers. The orders were widely characterized as punitive retaliation against firms whose clients included former special counsel Jack Smith and Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign. District Judge Beryl Howell blocked enforcement against Perkins Coie on 12 March, citing First Amendment violations. Paul Weiss reversed the order on 19 March after agreeing to $40 million in pro bono services.
• Trump warned law firms to "behave themselves" — After the settlement with Paul Weiss, Trump warned that "law firms have to behave themselves." The warning signals that the administration will use executive power to target firms that do not comply with its preferences.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14246 suspending security clearances of Jenner & Block employees, restricting federal contracts, and limiting government access to the law firm. — President Trump issued Executive Order 14246 on March 25, 2025, targeting Jenner & Block LLP. The order directs the Attorney General and Director of National Intelligence to suspend active security clearances held by firm employees pending review. It requires federal agencies to cease provision of government goods, property, and services to the firm. Agencies must review all contracts with Jenner & Block, terminate contracts where the firm provides services, require contractors to disclose business relationships with the firm, and restrict official access and engagement between federal employees and firm staff, including attorney Andrew Weissmann.
• Trump signs executive orders targeting law firms challenging his administration — President Trump signed multiple executive orders targeting major law firms (Jenner & Block, Covington and Burling, Perkins Coie, Paul Weiss) that have represented his political opponents or employed prosecutors involved in investigations into Trump. The orders threaten to revoke security clearances, deny access to government buildings, and require government clients to disclose representation by these firms. Trump also directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate lawyers blocking administration priorities. Paul Weiss capitulated and accepted Trump's demands; Perkins Coie obtained a temporary restraining order blocking its order.
• Trump issued executive order targeting law firm Jenner & Block, suspending security clearances and restricting federal contracts. — President Trump issued an executive order on March 25, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by Jenner & Block LLP employees, cease provision of government goods and services to the firm, and review all federal contracts involving the firm for termination. The order alleges the firm engaged in "partisan lawfare," pro bono work undermining administration priorities, and employment discrimination. It specifically names attorney Andrew Weissmann and restricts federal employee engagement with firm staff.
• White House signed executive order targeting law firm Jenner & Block, directing suspension of security clearances and termination of federal contracts. — The White House issued an executive order on March 25, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by Jenner & Block LLP employees, cease provision of government services and facilities to the firm, terminate federal contracts with the firm, and restrict official access and hiring of its employees. The order characterizes the firm as engaging in "partisan lawfare," pro bono activities deemed harmful to U.S. interests, and alleged racial discrimination. The order specifically names attorney Andrew Weissmann and directs agencies to submit compliance assessments within 30 days.
• Trump signed order targeting law firm with Mueller connection — Trump signed another executive order targeting a law firm that once employed Andrew Weissman, the former deputy to Robert Mueller, who investigated Russian interference in the 2016 election. The order suspends security clearances of the firm's employees, terminates government contracts, and orders a review of the firm's compliance with civil rights laws against racial bias.
• Trump administration stripped security clearances from law firms and barred attorneys from federal buildings — The Trump administration issued executive orders stripping security clearances from Perkins Coie and Paul, Weiss law firms and barring their attorneys from entering federal buildings, including courthouses. The chair of Paul, Weiss stated the move "could easily have destroyed our firm." The orders targeted firms representing Trump's opponents in litigation.
• Trump signed executive order encouraging disciplinary action against attorneys filing litigation against the administration — President Trump signed an executive order directing the attorney general to refer attorneys for disciplinary action if they file "frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation" against the administration. Critics argue the order will have a chilling effect on litigation challenging government actions, and law firms have begun refusing to represent Trump's opponents out of fear of retaliation.
• Trump issues Executive Order 14250 suspending security clearances and restricting federal contracts with WilmerHale law firm — President Trump signed Executive Order 14250 directing the suspension of security clearances held by WilmerHale employees pending national-interest review, cessation of federal goods and services to the firm, termination of government contracts with WilmerHale, restrictions on federal building access for firm employees, and guidance against hiring WilmerHale staff. The order cites the firm's pro bono work, representation of immigration and voting-rights cases, and employment of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller as grounds for the action.
• Trump issued executive order targeting WilmerHale law firm with security clearance suspensions and federal contracting restrictions. — President Trump issued an executive order on March 27, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by WilmerHale employees, cease provision of government goods and services to the firm, require federal contractors to disclose business relationships with WilmerHale, review and terminate relevant contracts, restrict WilmerHale employee access to federal buildings, and limit hiring of WilmerHale staff. The order cites the firm's pro bono work, representation of immigration and election-related cases, and employment of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller as grounds for the action.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14250 targeting WilmerHale law firm with security clearance suspensions, contract terminations, and personnel restrictions. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14250 on March 27, 2025, directing the suspension of security clearances held by WilmerHale employees pending review, cessation of government provision of materials and services to the firm, termination of federal contracts with WilmerHale, restrictions on federal employee access to WilmerHale staff, and limitations on hiring WilmerHale employees into government. The order characterizes the firm's pro bono work and representation of clients as threats to national security and American interests, and specifically names former Special Counsel Robert Mueller and colleagues as examples of "weaponization of government."
• Trump signed executive order suspending security clearances for WilmerHale employees and terminating federal contracts with the firm — President Trump signed an executive order on March 27, 2025, suspending security clearances held by WilmerHale employees pending review, halting federal material and services to the firm, restricting employee access to government buildings, terminating WilmerHale contracts, and barring federal agencies from hiring the firm's employees without authorization. The fact sheet characterizes WilmerHale as engaging in partisan activities, racial discrimination, and obstruction of immigration enforcement.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14253 directing removal of exhibits and narratives from federal museums and historical sites deemed ideologically divisive, with authority delegated to the Vice President over the Smithsonian Institution. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14253 on March 27, 2025, directing federal agencies to remove exhibits, programs, and historical narratives from museums and monuments that the order characterizes as "divisive" or promoting "ideology" rather than "objective facts." The order specifically targets the Smithsonian Institution, directing the Vice President to work through his role on the Smithsonian Board of Regents to remove what the order calls "improper ideology." It instructs the Secretary of the Interior to audit and reinstate pre-2020 monuments and ensure all federal historical sites focus on "greatness" and "achievements" rather than narratives the order deems disparaging. Future appropriations are to be conditioned on prohibiting exhibits that "divide Americans based on race" or are "inconsistent with Federal law and policy."
• Trump issues executive order directing federal agencies to remove "ideological" content from Smithsonian Institution and federal historical sites — President Trump signed an executive order on March 27, 2025, directing the Vice President, OMB Director, and Secretary of the Interior to remove what the order characterizes as "divisive, race-centered ideology" from the Smithsonian Institution, Independence National Historical Park, and other federal historical sites. The order mandates restoration of pre-2020 monuments and memorials, prohibits future federal funding for exhibits deemed to "degrade shared American values" or "divide Americans based on race," and requires the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum to exclude recognition of transgender athletes. The order frames this as restoring "truth" and "sanity" to American history.
• Trump administration issues executive orders targeting law firms; two firms sue to block — The Trump administration issued executive orders halting business with five law firms (Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Paul Weiss, Covington & Burling, Perkins Coie) and revoking security clearances of their attorneys, citing retaliation for the firms' representation of political opponents or employment of Trump critics. On Friday, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale filed federal lawsuits in Washington DC seeking to block the orders as unconstitutional. Perkins Coie had already successfully convinced a judge to block its order. Paul Weiss and Skadden reached settlements with the administration to avoid or withdraw orders.