Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Trump administration reassigns all USCIS anti-fraud officers to screen South African refugees and investigate alleged unlawful voters — The Trump administration has reassigned all Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) immigration officers at USCIS to two "high-priority" initiatives: screening South African refugees and investigating alleged noncitizen voters. Internal correspondence indicates USCIS cannot provide officers for asylum officer training in the near future. The refugee screening prioritizes South Africans, primarily Afrikaners, while the voter-screening initiative targets noncitizens alleged to have registered or voted. This diversion of anti-fraud personnel raises questions about whether routine asylum application screening has also slowed.
• Federal immigration officers reassigned to voter-data examination — Hundreds of officers in U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate were reassigned to examine voter data for possible noncitizen registrations, according to Washington Post reporting. Three former officials stated the reassignment caused regular work screening immigration applications for fraud and security threats to effectively halt. The administration stated it was lawfully cross-referencing voter information. Homeland Security Investigations also sought contractors capable of collecting and delivering voter-registration and voter-history files. The reassignment occurred less than three months before the November midterms.

Supporting reports

• US Supreme Court lifts injunction, allows Trump mail-in voting crackdown to proceed — The US Supreme Court voted 6-3 along ideological lines to lift a June injunction from a Massachusetts federal judge that had blocked Trump's March executive order targeting mail-in voting. The order directs the government to create a "state citizenship list" restricting mail-in ballot delivery and instructs the DOJ to prosecute state and local election officials deemed to have issued ballots to ineligible voters. Democratic-led states and voting rights groups challenged the order as unconstitutional; a second injunction remains in place. The ruling allows implementation to move forward while litigation continues ahead of November midterm elections.
• Supreme Court eased restrictions on Trump's mail-in ballot executive order — A divided Supreme Court lifted one of two injunctions blocking Trump's March executive order restricting mail-in voting, ruling the states' challenge was premature rather than deciding the order's merits. The unsigned opinion held that agencies had not finalized implementation rules when the challenge was filed. The USPS published final rules Friday and plans to make them official Wednesday. Legal analysts note the ruling is narrow and technical, with additional litigation expected as lower courts may issue new injunctions against the finalized rules before the November elections.
• Supreme Court releases opinion in Trump v. California (26A124) — The Supreme Court released an official slip opinion in Trump v. California. Docket number(s): 26A124.
• Supreme Court gave Trump procedural victory on mail-voting restrictions — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states challenging Trump's executive order restricting mail voting sued too early, granting the administration a procedural victory. The Court explicitly stated its decision did not mean the administration's implementation would be lawful. The Postal Service subsequently issued rules implementing parts of the order, including new voter-list and mail-ballot-processing requirements. New lawsuits followed, and on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Talwani temporarily blocked the Postal Service from enforcing the new mail-voting rule for 14 days pending further court consideration.

Supporting reports

• DHS drastically downgrades non-citizen voter claims in Nevada after public allegations — On 16 July, Trump claimed DHS had found approximately 278,000 non-citizens registered to vote across four states. In follow-up letters, DHS softened this to a "ceiling" of potential non-citizens. After meeting with Nevada election officials on 21 August, DHS admitted it had manually confirmed only 185 non-citizens on Nevada's voter rolls—a dramatic reduction from the initially claimed 15,903. DHS acknowledged the larger figure was "preliminary" and lacked full manual review. Nevada's Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar stated the state would not disenfranchise eligible voters without the highest confidence of ineligibility.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed: Democratic National Committee v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.D.C. 1:26-cv-02928) — The Democratic National Committee filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that the Department of Justice, FBI, and Criminal Division violated the Freedom of Information Act by failing to respond to February 2026 FOIA requests seeking records on any planned inspection or seizure of ballots, voting machines, and voting system components ahead of federal election certification. The DNC filed the requests after President Trump's January 2026 statements regretting not seizing voting machines after the 2020 election and an FBI raid that month seizing archived ballots from a Georgia county election office. The DNC seeks an order compelling production of non-exempt responsive records, a detailed Vaughn index of withheld material, and an injunction against further withholding.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed: Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security — Nashville, Columbus, El Paso, and Harris Counties filed a federal complaint challenging FEMA's Fiscal Year 2026 Homeland Security Grant Program conditions that withhold 20 percent of awards until recipients certify compliance with five "Election Administration Conditions," including hand-marked paper ballots, post-election manual audits, voter-to-ballot reconciliation, and citizenship verification via the SAVE database. Plaintiffs allege the conditions exceed FEMA's statutory authority, are arbitrary and capricious, violate separation of powers and the Spending Clause, and seek declaratory relief, vacatur, a stay, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief.

Supporting reports

• Trump posts AI-generated images attacking Abdul El-Sayed with Islamophobic framing — Trump posted multiple AI-generated meme images on social media, including one juxtaposing himself and Melania with Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed and his wife, captioned "Two VERY DIFFERENT America's." Republicans, including Trump, have repeatedly used El-Sayed's full name (Abdulrahman) instead of his preferred name (Abdul) to invoke religious fear, mirroring tactics previously used against President Obama.

Supporting reports

• One Nation nonprofit spent $1.7 million on false attack ad against Senator Ossoff in Georgia — One Nation, an opaque nonprofit affiliated with Senate Republicans, spent $1.7 million in five days to deliver 78 million impressions of an attack ad against Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) across Georgia. The ad falsely claims Ossoff voted to "gut" the child tax credit, supported a "$2,100 tax increase," and voted for higher taxes on Social Security recipients earning under $75,000. In fact, Ossoff voted to expand the child tax credit to its largest level in history and voted against the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" that Republicans supported. One Nation does not disclose its donors, making the funding source opaque.
• One Nation spent $1.7 million on dishonest attack ad against Senator Ossoff — One Nation, an opaque nonprofit affiliated with Senate Republicans, spent $1.7 million in less than a week on an attack ad against Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA). The ad received 78 million impressions across Georgia but contained false claims, attacking Ossoff for positions actually pursued by Republicans, including cutting the child tax credit, according to Popular Information's analysis.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Democracy Forward Foundation v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (D. Md.) — Democracy Forward Foundation filed a complaint in the District of Maryland on August 4, 2026, seeking to compel USCIS compliance with five pending FOIA requests submitted between June 17 and June 24, 2026. The requests seek records on internal directives concerning a State Citizenship List, email communications of senior USCIS officials on election-related matters, policies governing USCIS access to USPS mail-in and absentee ballot datasets, DOJ Civil Rights Division SAVE query data and error rates, and planning documents on voter roll review. Plaintiff alleges USCIS violated FOIA by failing to issue timely determinations and wrongly denying expedited processing despite urgent public interest in transparency over USCIS's role in election administration ahead of the midterms. Plaintiff seeks orders compelling expedited production, a Vaughn index, and injunctive relief against continued withholding.

Supporting reports

• White House issues fact sheet on declassified intelligence regarding Chinese election interference — The White House Government Transparency Task Force issued a fact sheet on July 30, 2026, presenting declassified intelligence documents approved by the directors of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, NSA, CIA, and DHS. The fact sheet claims that China and proxies acquired voter registration data on as many as 220 million Americans, including non-public data, and cites declassified Intelligence Community definitions of election interference and potential malign uses of such data. The White House states it coordinated with intelligence agencies in preparing the President's July 16 speech on the matter.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration and states urge justices to allow full implementation of executive order on mail-in voting — The Trump administration, along with several states, has petitioned the Supreme Court to permit the complete enforcement of an executive order concerning mail-in voting. This request seeks to implement new restrictions on mail-in voting, which have been contested in lower courts. The administration argues that these measures are necessary to ensure election integrity, while opponents claim they could suppress voter turnout. The Supreme Court's decision on this matter will have significant implications for the upcoming elections and the broader debate over voting rights.
• Trump administration files emergency appeal to restrict mail-in voting — The Trump administration filed an emergency appeal asking the Supreme Court to allow the president's March executive order restricting mail-in voting to move forward ahead of November's midterm elections. The move came two days after a federal appeals court upheld a block on the order, writing that allowing it to take effect for the midterms "would sow confusion and threaten disenfranchisement of many eligible voters."
• Trump administration sought Supreme Court review of mail voting restrictions — The Trump administration petitioned the Supreme Court to allow enforcement of Trump's mail voting order, which directs Homeland Security to compile state citizenship lists and requires Postal Service rules limiting mail ballots to voters on those lists. Twenty-three states and Washington, D.C., had successfully challenged the restrictions, and the First Circuit declined to revive them. The petition seeks to overturn lower court decisions blocking the order's implementation.

Supporting reports

• Twenty-five states and D.C. sued federal government over conditional disaster and homeland security funding — Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia filed a federal lawsuit in Rhode Island challenging FEMA and DHS conditions on billions of dollars in annual disaster relief and homeland security grants. The conditions require states to convert to paper ballots, conduct manual audits, reconcile voter registration lists, verify citizenship of all registered voters, assist DHS in immigration enforcement, and accept DHS authority to withdraw all grants at will. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha characterized the conditions as "unlawfully withholding billions in critical funding" to coerce election and immigration policy changes.

Supporting reports

• Twenty-five Democratic attorneys general sue Trump administration over politicized FEMA disaster aid conditions — Twenty-five Democratic state attorneys general, led by California's Rob Bonta, filed a federal lawsuit in Rhode Island challenging the Trump administration's imposition of "unlawful" conditions on over $740 million in federal disaster preparedness and counter-terrorism grants. The conditions require states to implement federal voter citizenship verification systems, conduct post-election audits, and assist ICE in deportation operations. The lawsuit also challenges FEMA's new authority to cancel grants if states are deemed misaligned with agency priorities. A Trump-appointed judge previously ruled similar conditions "unconscionable and unlawful."
• Twenty-five states and D.C. sued federal government over conditional disaster and homeland security funding — Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia filed a federal lawsuit in Rhode Island challenging FEMA and DHS conditions on billions of dollars in annual disaster relief and homeland security grants. The conditions require states to convert to paper ballots, conduct manual audits, reconcile voter registration lists, verify citizenship of all registered voters, assist DHS in immigration enforcement, and accept DHS authority to withdraw all grants at will. Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha characterized the conditions as "unlawfully withholding billions in critical funding" to coerce election and immigration policy changes.
• Complaint filed — State of Illinois v. Federal Emergency Management Agency — On July 23, 2026, 25 states, the District of Columbia, and the governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island challenging FEMA's new Fiscal Year 2026 Homeland Security Grant Program conditions. The conditions require states to transition to hand-marked paper ballots, conduct post-election audits, verify voter and election worker citizenship using federal immigration databases, and comply with other election and immigration-related mandates as a prerequisite to receiving over $1 billion in federal preparedness funding. Plaintiffs allege the conditions exceed FEMA's statutory authority, are arbitrary and capricious, and violate the Spending Clause. They seek declaratory judgment, vacatur, injunctive relief, and a writ of mandamus.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — State of Illinois v. Federal Emergency Management Agency — On July 23, 2026, 25 states, the District of Columbia, and the governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island challenging FEMA's new Fiscal Year 2026 Homeland Security Grant Program conditions. The conditions require states to transition to hand-marked paper ballots, conduct post-election audits, verify voter and election worker citizenship using federal immigration databases, and comply with other election and immigration-related mandates as a prerequisite to receiving over $1 billion in federal preparedness funding. Plaintiffs allege the conditions exceed FEMA's statutory authority, are arbitrary and capricious, and violate the Spending Clause. They seek declaratory judgment, vacatur, injunctive relief, and a writ of mandamus.

Supporting reports

• Republicans promoted SAVE Act using Olive Garden pasta pass analogy. — Multiple Republican officials and media figures promoted the SAVE Act (voter ID requirement) by comparing voting security to Olive Garden's photo ID requirement for its "never-ending pasta pass." House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Stephen Miller, Rep. David Kustoff, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson, Fox host Will Cain, and Sen. Dave McCormick all used variations of this talking point to argue that voting should require photo ID.

Supporting reports

• White House issues release on New Jersey voter registration incident, promotes SAVE America Act — The White House issued a release stating that New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill admitted a "software glitch" registered approximately 6,600 noncitizens to vote between 2023 and 2024, with hundreds casting ballots. The release characterizes this as resulting from "Democrat policies that refuse basic citizenship checks" and calls for immediate passage of the SAVE America Act, which would require states to use the Department of Homeland Security's SAVE system to verify citizenship before voter registration and mandate voter ID for federal elections.

Supporting reports

• Trump demanded Congress pass SAVE America voter suppression act — President Trump demanded that Congress pass the SAVE America voter suppression act, stating that "the only reason you wouldn't do it is you want to cheat because your policies are so bad and your candidates are so pathetic that you can't get elected in any other way." Trump framed the legislation as urgently needed to prevent election fraud and called on Americans to pressure lawmakers to pass it.

Supporting reports

• Trump announced election security speech with unverified claims — President Trump announced he will deliver a primetime speech on election security, promising to reveal "really big news." The speech will touch on previously unreported Chinese meddling in U.S. elections, with Cabinet officials including heads of CIA, FBI, ODNI, and DHS invited to attend. However, Senate Intelligence Committee staff noted the information about Chinese access to voter data is not new—China gained access to publicly available voter files in several states that can be purchased for $485 from state election offices. Republican officials expressed concern Trump will repeat debunked conspiracy theories or make baseless claims about the 2020 election.
• Trump announced primetime speech claiming China accessed 2020 election data with CIA cover-up — President Trump scheduled a primetime address for July 16, 2026, claiming that China accessed U.S. voter data during the 2020 election and that the CIA knew about it and concealed the information during his first term. The speech is framed as laying groundwork to question the legitimacy of Democratic electoral wins in states like Georgia, months before the midterm elections. Trump has simultaneously posted photographs with Xi Jinping, the person he is accusing of orchestrating the alleged plot.

Supporting reports

• Trump announced declassification and criminal investigation of alleged election intelligence coverup — Trump announced immediate declassification of critical election intelligence and directed the DNI, DOJ, FBI, and CIA to investigate how and why information was allegedly hidden from presidential briefings, to fire those involved in a coverup, and to file criminal charges if appropriate. The directive targeted intelligence officials over alleged withholding of reports about foreign election targeting.
• Trump announced election security speech with unverified claims — President Trump announced he will deliver a primetime speech on election security, promising to reveal "really big news." The speech will touch on previously unreported Chinese meddling in U.S. elections, with Cabinet officials including heads of CIA, FBI, ODNI, and DHS invited to attend. However, Senate Intelligence Committee staff noted the information about Chinese access to voter data is not new—China gained access to publicly available voter files in several states that can be purchased for $485 from state election offices. Republican officials expressed concern Trump will repeat debunked conspiracy theories or make baseless claims about the 2020 election.
• Trump announced primetime speech claiming China accessed 2020 election data with CIA cover-up — President Trump scheduled a primetime address for July 16, 2026, claiming that China accessed U.S. voter data during the 2020 election and that the CIA knew about it and concealed the information during his first term. The speech is framed as laying groundwork to question the legitimacy of Democratic electoral wins in states like Georgia, months before the midterm elections. Trump has simultaneously posted photographs with Xi Jinping, the person he is accusing of orchestrating the alleged plot.

Supporting reports

• Trump reposted poll claiming support for voter suppression legislation — At 6:07 PM, Trump reposted what purported to be a poll from right-wing loyalist Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) claiming that 97.2% of supporters want the Senate to take up the voter suppression SAVE America Act when it returns to session the following week, while only 2.8% want the Senate to address "Anything else." The repost continued Trump's calls for the Senate to pass restrictive voting legislation.

Supporting reports

• Justice Department threatened state election officials with criminal prosecution — On Tuesday, the Justice Department sent letters to all 50 states and Washington, D.C., warning election officials they could face criminal prosecution if they knowingly allow noncitizens to remain on voter rolls or cast ballots. Officials were given five days to explain compliance. Election law experts noted noncitizen voting is already illegal, studies show it is rare, and DOJ has not won a single lawsuit seeking state voter roll access. Experts characterized the letters as intimidation ahead of November's midterms rather than the start of prosecutions.
• DOJ threatens state election officials with criminal charges over voter data and noncitizen voting claims — The U.S. Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, sent letters to all 50 states and D.C. threatening potential criminal charges against state election officials who fail to comply with federal demands regarding noncitizen voting. The letters, signed by Harmeet K. Dhillon (head of the civil rights division), cite federal law and criminal liability, demanding states respond within five days on compliance measures. State officials from both parties rejected the threats as intimidation and noted courts have repeatedly ruled similar federal demands for voter data illegal.
• Department of Justice sent intimidating letters to state election officials — The Department of Justice, through Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, sent letters to election officials in all fifty states and Washington, D.C., warning of potential criminal prosecution if noncitizens vote and demanding they detail how they will maintain "clean voter lists" within five days. This followed federal court orders prohibiting the administration from seizing state voter lists for a noncitizen-identification program.

Supporting reports

• Trump’s Financial Disclosure Reveals $2.2 Billion Earnings — President Trump disclosed earnings of $2.2 billion in the first year of his second term, with $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency businesses. This marks a significant increase from his 2024 earnings. Additionally, Trump hosted election denier Tina Peters in the Oval Office, who was recently granted clemency after a conviction for tampering with voting machines.
• Trump earned $2.3 billion while cryptocurrency investors lost equivalent amount — Analysis of Trump family and cryptocurrency venture investor gains and losses showed the Trump family took approximately $2.3 billion in income since the beginning of Trump's second presidency, while investors in those same ventures lost approximately the same amount. The pattern demonstrates a direct transfer of wealth from retail investors to the Trump family through cryptocurrency ventures.
• Trump family structured cryptocurrency ventures to extract front-end fees while investors absorbed losses — Analysis of Trump's cryptocurrency ventures revealed the family structured deals so Trump extracted hundreds of millions in transaction fees on the front end. When the coins subsequently plummeted in value, outside investors holding the coins suffered vast losses while Trump had already secured his profits. The structure allowed Trump to profit regardless of the long-term performance of the cryptocurrency products he promoted.
• Trump financial disclosure reveals $2.2 billion in first-year earnings from presidency — Trump's financial disclosure for his first year back in office revealed he earned approximately $2.2 billion, including $1.4 billion from family cryptocurrency businesses and $636 million from the $TRUMP memecoin. The New York Times reported Trump stated "nobody cared" about conflicts of interest. Trump made 22,000 stock transactions in 2025, compared to President Biden's 13 transactions over four years. Mar-a-Lago membership fees rose to $1 million, generating $77.5 million annually—triple 2020 levels and 50% above 2024.
• Trump administration deregulates crypto industry — Under President Trump's second administration, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has significantly reduced its regulatory actions against the crypto industry. A New York Times investigation found that the SEC eased up on over 60% of ongoing crypto cases. Notably, the SEC dismissed enforcement cases against major crypto exchanges like Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, and Robinhood's crypto arm, all of which list and promote Trump's $TRUMP coin. This deregulation has facilitated increased trading volume and boosted Trump's financial returns from his crypto ventures.
• Trump earns $636 million from meme coin venture — President Donald Trump earned $636 million from his meme coin business, CIC Digital LLC, primarily through royalties from a license agreement with Celebration Coins. This income is part of the $1.4 billion Trump reported from crypto-related businesses in his financial disclosure. Despite Trump's significant earnings, investors in the $TRUMP coin have faced substantial losses, with the coin's value dropping by 97% since its launch. A Reuters investigation revealed that buyers invested at least $1.2 billion into $TRUMP, but their holdings were worth only $521 million as of April 30, 2026.
• Trump's Presidential Earnings Reach $2.2 Billion in First Year of Second Term — According to a new financial disclosure, Trump made $2.2 billion in the first year of his second term as president, compared to $622 million in 2024. Of the $2.2 billion, $1.4 billion came from his family's cryptocurrency businesses, making Trump the highest crypto earner in the United States. The disclosure reveals unprecedented personal enrichment while serving as president.
• Trump family crypto ventures generated over $1bn in first year of second term, disclosed in 927-page ethics filing — A 927-page financial disclosure released by the US Office of Government Ethics on Tuesday revealed that President Trump received over $2.2bn in total income last year, including more than $1bn from cryptocurrency ventures. World Liberty Financial, a joint venture between the Trump family and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff's family, generated over $500m from governance token sales. CIC Digital LLC produced over $600m from Trump-branded meme coins launched days before inauguration. The disclosures prompted Democratic senators, including Elizabeth Warren, to demand tighter congressional rules preventing political figures and their families from profiting off the crypto industry.
• Trump Reports $1.4 Billion Income from Cryptocurrency Ventures — A federal filing revealed that President Trump earned approximately $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency ventures last year, including significant profits from a venture with his sons and other investments. This financial disclosure raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the administration's regulatory stance on cryptocurrencies.
• Trump's 2025 financial disclosure reveals $2.2 billion in income, including $1.2 billion from crypto venture — Trump's financial disclosure for 2025 itemizes $2.2 billion in income across 927 pages, with a crypto business generating approximately $1.2 billion in a single year—exceeding decades of real estate empire earnings. The largest single payday was $635 million in royalties from the $TRUMP meme coin, which has since crashed approximately 95% from its launch, destroying billions in value for small investors. The disclosure also includes tens of millions from legal settlements with media and tech companies.
• Trump's financial disclosure revealed $1.4 billion in crypto income — Trump's annual financial disclosure released Tuesday showed more than $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025, making it his single largest source of money. This income stream exists while his administration writes the rules governing the cryptocurrency industry, creating a direct conflict of interest between personal financial gain and regulatory authority.

Supporting reports

• Trump says housing bill is "a big yawn" compared to Save America Act — During an Oval Office press availability, Trump stated that the housing bill coming to him later that day is "a big yawn" compared to the Save America Act, suggesting he has not yet decided whether to sign it.
• Trump declines to commit to signing bipartisan housing bill — When asked whether he would sign a bipartisan housing bill that passed Congress with overwhelming support, Trump declined to commit, calling the bill "a yawn." He indicated he would hold the housing bill hostage pending passage of a voter ID law he favors, stating that compared to the "Save America Act," most other legislation is "a big yawn." This conditional stance links his legislative cooperation to partisan electoral advantage.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court agrees to hear six new cases, including a dispute over proof of citizenship to vote — The Supreme Court has agreed to hear six new cases, one of which involves a dispute over the requirement of proof of citizenship to vote. This case could have significant implications for voting rights and election laws across the United States. The decision to hear these cases indicates the Court's willingness to address contentious issues that may impact democratic processes and civil rights.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court upholds Mississippi mail-in ballot counting rule — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5–4 in Watson v. RNC that a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted if postmarked by and received within five days of Election Day does not violate federal law. The Court rejected the argument that federal law requires mail-in ballots to be received by Election Day itself.
• Supreme Court rejects RNC challenge to late-received mail-in ballots — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Barrett rejecting the Republican National Committee's challenge to state laws counting mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received after Election Day. The Court held that the Federal Election Day statute does not preempt state authority to count such ballots and that responsibility for the mechanics of elections belongs to the states by default. The RNC had sued Mississippi in Watson v. RNC, seeking to establish that "Election Day" means the date by which all ballots must be received, a theory the Court rejected.
• US Supreme Court upholds state law counting mail-in ballots arriving after election day — The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Watson v. Republican National Committee that states may count mail-in ballots postmarked by election day even if they arrive within five business days afterward. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and the three liberal justices, rejecting the RNC's challenge to Mississippi's law. The decision affirms state authority over election procedures and protects similar laws in fourteen states, Washington DC, and three territories. President Trump called the ruling a "tremendous loss" and renewed calls for the Save America Act.
• Justices uphold state law allowing for late-arriving mail-in ballots — The Supreme Court upheld a state law that permits mail-in ballots to be counted even if they arrive after Election Day, as long as they are postmarked by that day. This decision supports the state's efforts to ensure that all votes are counted, particularly in light of potential postal delays. The ruling is seen as a victory for voting rights advocates who argue that such measures are necessary to ensure fair and accessible elections.
• Supreme Court releases opinion in Watson v. Republican National Committee (24-1260) — The Supreme Court released an official slip opinion in Watson v. Republican National Committee. Docket number(s): 24-1260.
• Trump characterizes mail-in ballot ruling as enabling illegal voting — During an Oval Office press availability, Trump stated that the Supreme Court's mail-in ballot ruling was "a little bit surprising" and "very detrimental to honest elections" because it "gives people more time to vote illegally."
• US Supreme Court strikes down limits on coordinated party campaign spending — The US Supreme Court ruled in National Republican Senatorial Committee v Federal Election Commission that limits on "coordinated party expenditures" are unconstitutional, eliminating restrictions on how much political parties can spend in support of their candidates. The case originated from a 2022 lawsuit by JD Vance and Republican officials challenging the FEC's enforcement of these limits. The Trump administration supported the challenge; the FEC, lacking a quorum since April 2025, could not mount a full defense. The ruling continues a two-decade trend of dismantling campaign finance restrictions.
• Supreme Court rules in favor of unlimited coordinated political party spending — The Supreme Court issued a ruling permitting unlimited coordinated spending by political parties. The decision expands the scope of campaign finance by removing restrictions on coordination between parties and outside groups, potentially increasing the influence of wealthy donors and organized party structures in elections.

Supporting reports

• Federal judge blocks Trump administration's executive order restricting mail-in voting — US District Judge Indira Talwani ruled unconstitutional an executive order issued by Trump on March 31, 2026, requiring the postal service to implement a barcode tracking system for ballot envelopes tied to citizenship data. The order would have denied mail-in ballots to states refusing to submit voter rolls to federal officials. Voting rights groups, 23 states, and DC sued to block the rule, arguing the Constitution grants no presidential authority over election administration. The injunction prevents the administration from creating a federal program to control state voter rolls or prosecuting states for non-compliance, though states may voluntarily participate.
• Federal judge blocks Trump executive order requiring voter citizenship documentation — US District Court Judge Denise Casper in Massachusetts ruled on June 25, 2026, that Trump's executive order mandating documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration was unconstitutional. The order would have required voters to present passports, birth certificates, or similar documents. Casper found that the Constitution grants the President no specific powers over elections, which are primarily governed by states and Congress. None of the order's provisions had been implemented before the ruling.
• Summary judgment ruling — State of California v. Trump (D. Mass.) 1:26-cv-11581 — Judge Talwani granted Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, declaring Sections 2 and 3 of Executive Order 14399 - which directed DHS to compile “State Citizenship Lists” of eligible voters from federal databases and directed USPS to maintain “Mail-In and Absentee Participation Lists” and refuse delivery of mail ballots from voters not on those lists - legally void as ultra vires and unconstitutional violations of the separation of powers. The court held that voter eligibility is reserved exclusively to the states under the Constitution and that no federal statute delegates to the president or USPS any authority over mail-in ballot delivery. The court permanently enjoined defendant agencies from implementing those provisions with respect to the Nov. 3, 2026 general election and any earlier federal elections in Plaintiff States. The court also declared Section 5 of the EO - which provided that states should preserve election records for five years - is a nonbinding recommendation because the president lacks authority to impose a retention requirement beyond the twenty-two-month period Congress set in the Civil Rights Act of 1960. Defendants are ordered to file a status report with the court within seven days describing steps taken to ensure compliance.
• Federal judge voided mail-ballot restriction order — On Thursday, June 26, Judge Indira Talwani voided the core of the March mail-voting order, which would have used the Postal Service to limit mail-ballot delivery to a federally approved voter list and would have built that national list in the first place. Roughly two dozen states joined the suits challenging the order.