Narrow these 3 — tap a value to filter:
Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Jun 25, 2026 Judge Indira Talwani ruled unconstitutional an executive order restricting mail-in voting and directing postal delivery holds Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
A federal judge invalidated provisions requiring the Postal Service to withhold mail ballots from states that refused to submit voter rolls, protecting mail-voting access from unilateral executive interference.
Supporting reports
- Federal judge blocks Trump administration's executive order restricting mail-in voting — US District Judge Indira Talwani ruled unconstitutional an executive order issued by Trump on March 31, 2026, requiring the postal service to implement a barcode tracking system for ballot envelopes tied to citizenship data. The order would have denied mail-in ballots to states refusing to submit voter rolls to federal officials. Voting rights groups, 23 states, and DC sued to block the rule, arguing the Constitution grants no presidential authority over election administration. The injunction prevents the administration from creating a federal program to control state voter rolls or prosecuting states for non-compliance, though states may voluntarily participate.
- Federal judge blocks Trump executive order requiring voter citizenship documentation — US District Court Judge Denise Casper in Massachusetts ruled on June 25, 2026, that Trump's executive order mandating documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration was unconstitutional. The order would have required voters to present passports, birth certificates, or similar documents. Casper found that the Constitution grants the President no specific powers over elections, which are primarily governed by states and Congress. None of the order's provisions had been implemented before the ruling.
- Summary judgment ruling — State of California v. Trump (D. Mass.) 1:26-cv-11581 — Judge Talwani granted Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, declaring Sections 2 and 3 of Executive Order 14399 - which directed DHS to compile “State Citizenship Lists” of eligible voters from federal databases and directed USPS to maintain “Mail-In and Absentee Participation Lists” and refuse delivery of mail ballots from voters not on those lists - legally void as ultra vires and unconstitutional violations of the separation of powers. The court held that voter eligibility is reserved exclusively to the states under the Constitution and that no federal statute delegates to the president or USPS any authority over mail-in ballot delivery. The court permanently enjoined defendant agencies from implementing those provisions with respect to the Nov. 3, 2026 general election and any earlier federal elections in Plaintiff States. The court also declared Section 5 of the EO - which provided that states should preserve election records for five years - is a nonbinding recommendation because the president lacks authority to impose a retention requirement beyond the twenty-two-month period Congress set in the Civil Rights Act of 1960. Defendants are ordered to file a status report with the court within seven days describing steps taken to ensure compliance.
- Federal judge voided mail-ballot restriction order — On Thursday, June 26, Judge Indira Talwani voided the core of the March mail-voting order, which would have used the Postal Service to limit mail-ballot delivery to a federally approved voter list and would have built that national list in the first place. Roughly two dozen states joined the suits challenging the order.
Jun 24, 2026 Judge Denise Casper permanently blocked Trump's executive order asserting federal control over voter citizenship verification Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
A federal judge ruled that the Constitution grants the president no specific authority over elections, striking down a key provision of an executive order attempting to centralize control over voter rolls.
Supporting reports
- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Trump administration suit against Michigan for voter roll access — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rejected the Trump administration's lawsuit against Michigan seeking access to state voter rolls. This ruling continues a pattern in which courts have struck down Trump's attempts to obtain voter rolls in all nine cases on which there has been a ruling. The administration has sued 30 states and the District of Columbia to compel surrender of voter rolls.
- U.S. District Judge Denise Casper permanently blocks Trump's March 2025 election executive order — U.S. District Judge Denise Casper in Boston permanently blocked much of Trump's March 2025 executive order attempting to gain power over elections. The ruling prevents implementation of provisions that would have centralized election authority in the executive branch.
- Federal judge permanently barred proof-of-citizenship registration order — On Wednesday, June 25, Judge Denise Casper in Boston permanently barred the proof-of-citizenship registration order, writing that the Constitution gives the president no specific power over elections. The ruling struck down a key element of the administration's effort to federalize election administration.
Jun 23, 2026 Judge Sparkle Sooknanan blocked use of a federal immigration database to purge state voter rolls Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
A court barred the administration from using a repurposed immigration-verification system, with a documented 14 percent error rate, to screen and remove eligible voters from state rolls.
Supporting reports
- Federal judge blocked use of revamped immigration database to scrub voter rolls — On Monday, June 23, Judge Sparkle Sooknanan in Washington blocked the use of a revamped immigration database, stitched together from Social Security numbers and citizenship data, to scrub state voter rolls. Advocates had called the database unreliable.
- U.S. District Judge Sooknanan blocked SAVE system for voter roll checks — U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan in Washington, D.C., ruled that the Trump administration could not use the SAVE system (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) to check state voting rolls. The judge stated: "The federal government has knowingly trampled on the privacy rights of American citizens in a manner that threatens the sacred right to vote." The administration had attempted to force states to turn over voting rolls to run through a federal database query system. A ProPublica investigation in February showed the system had an error rate of at least 14 percent, misidentifying legal voters as illegal ones.
- Federal judge blocks nationwide voter roll purge database — A federal judge issued a nationwide injunction blocking Trump's voter roll purge database. The ruling prevented implementation of the system across all states.