Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Elon Musk offers million-dollar payments to Wisconsin voters — Elon Musk advertised a contest offering two Wisconsin voters $1 million each in exchange for signing a petition against "activist judges" in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election. The offer violated Wisconsin law prohibiting offering anything worth more than $1 to induce voting or refraining from voting. After Wisconsin Democrats identified the violation, Musk deleted the original tweet and reposted it, removing language requiring voters to have already voted and instead offering checks to petition spokespeople. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul sued to stop Musk from making any payments to Wisconsin electors to vote.
• Wisconsin Attorney General sues to stop Musk million-dollar offer — Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed suit against Elon Musk to stop him "from any further promotion of the million-dollar gifts" and "from making any payments to Wisconsin electors to vote." Kaul stated that the Wisconsin Department of Justice is committed to ensuring elections are "safe, secure, free, and fair" and that the offer violated Wisconsin law. The lawsuit seeks a court order to prevent the payments before the April 1 election.
• Elon Musk sued by Wisconsin attorney general over illegal campaign giveaway — Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, sued Elon Musk and his Super PAC on Friday, March 28, 2025, to stop a $1 million giveaway tied to voting and petition-signing in the state supreme court race. Musk had posted on X/Twitter offering $1 million as a sweepstakes-like contest to people who voted, then deleted the post after legal experts flagged potential violations of Wisconsin state law. He reposted a revised version claiming the money would go to petition spokespeople. An appeals court reportedly declined to immediately halt the giveaway.
• Wisconsin Attorney General announced legal action to stop Musk's million-dollar event — Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul stated that the Wisconsin Department of Justice was aware of Elon Musk's offer to award $1 million to two people at a Wisconsin event and announced the department intended to take legal action that day to seek a court order to stop the event from occurring, citing applicable Wisconsin election law.

Supporting reports

• Trump signs executive order requiring documentary proof of citizenship for federal voter registration — President Trump signed an executive order on March 25 requiring documentary proof of citizenship to be added to federal voter registration forms. States that do not comply face federal funding cuts. White House staff secretary Will Scharf characterized the order as "the farthest-reaching executive action taken" in the country's history. Multiple states have announced they will challenge the order as an unconstitutional federal overreach. The order targets the same nonexistent problem of noncitizen voting that the Save Act addresses.
• Trump executive order directs EAC to amend federal voter registration form — President Trump's March 25 executive order "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections" instructs the Election Assistance Commission to amend the federal voter registration form to require proof of citizenship documentation, such as a passport. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, 21.3 million eligible Americans lack readily available proof of citizenship, meaning the requirement could disenfranchise millions of voters despite noncitizen voting being extremely rare.
• Trump executive order threatens to withhold federal election funding from states — Trump's March 25 executive order threatens to withhold federal election funding from states that count mail-in ballots received after Election Day, even if those ballots were mailed before Election Day. Over a dozen states allow this practice. The order also instructs the Secretary of Defense to add proof-of-citizenship requirements to military and overseas voter registration forms and directs the EAC to decertify all previously certified voting machines.
• White House issued fact sheet on executive order directing election integrity measures — The White House published a fact sheet on March 25, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump that day. The order directs federal agencies to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration, mandates state access to federal databases for citizenship verification, prioritizes prosecution of non-citizen voting, conditions federal election funding on state compliance with citizenship verification and paper ballot requirements, and directs the Attorney General to enforce voter-list maintenance and prevent non-citizens from election administration roles.
• White House signed Executive Order 14248 on election integrity requirements — The White House signed Executive Order 14248 on March 25, 2025, directing federal agencies to enforce citizenship verification in voter registration, require paper ballots with voter-verifiable records, enforce Election Day ballot receipt deadlines, prevent non-citizen voting, coordinate with states on voter list maintenance, prosecute election crimes, and secure voting systems. The order mandates the Election Assistance Commission amend voting system guidelines within 180 days and condition federal funding on state compliance with citizenship documentation and ballot receipt requirements.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14248 requiring documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, enforcing Election Day ballot receipt deadlines, and directing federal agencies to verify voter eligibility and prosecute election crimes. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14248 on March 25, 2025, establishing federal election-integrity policies. The order mandates documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration; requires states to reject ballots received after Election Day; directs DHS, DOJ, and SSA to share citizenship and eligibility databases with election officials; authorizes DOJ to withhold federal funds from non-compliant states; requires voting systems to produce voter-verifiable paper records; and directs cessation of prior administration voting-access initiatives. The order invokes federal statutes governing election administration and citizenship verification.
• Trump signed executive order on election integrity requiring citizenship documentation and voter list maintenance — President Donald Trump issued an executive order on March 25, 2025, titled "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections." The order directs federal agencies to enforce existing election laws, including requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration, mandating states maintain accurate voter rolls, restricting mail-in ballot counting to Election Day, and requiring paper ballots with voter-verifiable records. It tasks the Election Assistance Commission, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and Social Security Administration with implementing citizenship verification, voter list audits, and prosecution of election crimes.
• Trump signed executive order on election laws — Trump signed an executive order making changes to election laws, including requiring proof of US citizenship on voter registration forms. States that don't comply with the directive could lose federal funding. The order also directs the attorney general to take action against states that count ballots received after election day in federal elections. The order also gives DOGE access to state voter lists, which could result in voter purges.
• Trump signs executive order requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration — Donald Trump signed a far-reaching executive order on March 26, 2025, that fundamentally alters U.S. voter registration processes by requiring documentary proof of citizenship (such as a passport) to vote in federal elections. The order amends the federal voter registration form, empowers federal agencies to cut funding to non-compliant states, instructs the DOJ to prosecute alleged "election crimes," and seeks to block states from accepting mail-in ballots after election day. Legal experts and voting rights advocates warn the order could disenfranchise tens of millions of eligible voters and faces constitutional challenges.
• Trump signed executive order on voter citizenship requirements — President Trump signed an executive order that would, if enforceable, dramatically change U.S. elections and restrict voting rights for tens of millions of Americans by imposing new citizenship verification requirements. Legal analyst Marc Elias of Democracy Docket characterized the order as "confused, rhetorical and—in places—nonsensical. It asserts facts that are not true and claims authority he does not possess. It is not meant to be taken seriously or literally. Rather, it is the empty threat of a weak man desperate to appear strong."
• Trump issues executive order on election integrity titled "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections" — President Trump issued an executive order titled "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections" that asserts presidential powers over election administration, including restricting which ballots states can count and granting DOGE unspecified authority to review state voter rolls. The order lacks constitutional or statutory basis, as election regulation authority rests with state legislatures and Congress, not the president. Election law advocates announced plans to challenge the order in court.
• Trump issues executive order on voting rules and mail ballot administration — President Donald Trump issued an executive order on voting on Tuesday, March 26, 2025, that directs states to change rules for accepting mail ballots and empowers the Department of Government Efficiency to subpoena state records to investigate voter fraud claims. The order represents a direct federal intervention in state election administration that exceeds the scope of Biden's 2021 voter registration executive order, which Republicans had challenged as unconstitutional federal overreach.
• Trump signed an executive order affecting U.S. elections — President Trump signed an executive order that aims to change U.S. elections by requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote. This order has been criticized as confusing and nonsensical, with experts suggesting it is not meant to be taken seriously. The order could potentially disenfranchise millions of Americans and raises concerns about voter access and election integrity.

Supporting reports

• Elon Musk's PACs spent $12 million on Wisconsin Supreme Court race with $20 million expected — Elon Musk's political action committees have spent $12 million supporting Republican Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Brad Schimel, with an expected total of $20 million by election day. Musk is also buying votes by offering to pay people $100 to "sign a petition" against "activist judges," replicating a strategy used in Pennsylvania and other key states. Trump has made multiple posts on Truth Social promoting Schimel and attacking his Democratic opponent Susan Crawford. Schimel's opponent is using Musk's involvement to her advantage, running ads stating "Elon Musk is trying to buy Schimel a seat on the Supreme Court."
• Elon Musk attempted to influence Wisconsin Supreme Court election through financial intervention — Elon Musk made an attempt to buy influence in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election through financial means. The election is described as the most expensive judicial race in history and will determine abortion laws and legislative and congressional district lines. The intervention represents private wealth attempting to shape judicial outcomes on major policy questions.
• Elon Musk's PAC spent $19 million on Wisconsin Supreme Court election and paid voters — Elon Musk's political action committee spent $19 million supporting the Republican candidate in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election, which will determine the court's ideological balance. The PAC also paid Wisconsin residents $100 each to sign a petition against "activist judges" and announced $1 million prize awards to incentivize petition signatures, with additional million-dollar awards planned.
• Elon Musk offers million-dollar payments to Wisconsin voters — Elon Musk advertised a contest offering two Wisconsin voters $1 million each in exchange for signing a petition against "activist judges" in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election. The offer violated Wisconsin law prohibiting offering anything worth more than $1 to induce voting or refraining from voting. After Wisconsin Democrats identified the violation, Musk deleted the original tweet and reposted it, removing language requiring voters to have already voted and instead offering checks to petition spokespeople. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul sued to stop Musk from making any payments to Wisconsin electors to vote.
• Elon Musk contributes $20 million to Wisconsin Supreme Court election — Elon Musk contributed more than $20 million to the April 1, 2025 election for a ten-year seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Trump loyalist Brad Schimel is running against circuit court judge Susan Crawford. The election has national significance because Wisconsin's court composition determines whether voting rules are suppressed and districts are gerrymandered. Currently, the Republican gerrymander gives Republicans 75% of Wisconsin's U.S. House seats despite nearly even statewide voting. The court's makeup will likely determine Wisconsin's congressional districts through 2041.

Supporting reports

• Judge issues restraining order against DOGE — U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander issued a temporary restraining order against the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), prohibiting the Social Security Administration from sharing personally identifiable information with DOGE. The judge criticized DOGE for lacking justification for its access to SSA records, highlighting concerns about privacy and government overreach.
• DOGE conducted unauthorized searches of Social Security data after court restraining order — According to the Department of Justice court filing, DOGE team members conducted searches of personally identifiable information on March 24, 2025, even after the Social Security Administration believed it had revoked all such access in compliance with a federal court's temporary restraining order issued March 20, 2025. The final search occurred at approximately 9:30 a.m., with full access terminated by noon that day. DOGE members had also been granted access to systems beyond what the agency previously reported to the court, including employee records and personnel access information.
• Federal judge blocked DOGE access to federal agency data — A federal judge temporarily blocked Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing the private data of individuals at several federal agencies. The block prevents DOGE from obtaining sensitive personal information held by the government.
• DOGE staffer signed agreement to share Social Security data with election denial group — In March 2025, a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer embedded at the Social Security Administration signed a "Voter Data Agreement" with a political advocacy group seeking to overturn election results in certain states. According to a court filing by government lawyers, the DOGE employee sent the executed agreement on March 24, 2025. Emails suggest DOGE team members could have been asked to assist the group by accessing SSA data to match voter rolls. The SSA referred the involved employees to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel for possible Hatch Act violations.
• Federal judge blocks DOGE access to federal employee personal databases — On February 3, Popular Information reported that DOGE staff at the Office of Personnel Management received unprecedented access to databases containing sensitive personal information for millions of federal employees. A week later, a coalition of labor unions representing federal workers sued OPM citing Popular Information's report seven times. On March 24, a federal judge issued an injunction blocking DOGE's access to the databases.

Supporting reports

• NC H171, H294, H302, and H318 bills in committee — Several controversial bills are scheduled for committee meetings at the North Carolina General Assembly. These include NC H171, which prohibits DEI in state agencies, and NC H294 and H302, which make Boards of Elections partisan in Jackson and Pitt Counties. NC H318, the "Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act," is also under consideration. These bills are part of a legislative agenda that critics argue undermines diversity, electoral fairness, and immigrant rights.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration cuts cybersecurity funding — The Trump administration cut millions in federal funding from two cybersecurity initiatives, including one that assists state and local election officials. This reduction in funding could impact election security and infrastructure.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order on Perkins Coie LLP — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14230, addressing alleged risks posed by the law firm Perkins Coie LLP. The order mandates a review of security clearances held by Perkins Coie employees, cessation of government services to the firm, and scrutiny of government contracts involving the firm. It also directs investigations into racial discrimination practices by large law firms, including Perkins Coie, and limits federal engagement with the firm to protect national security interests.
• Executive Order: Addressing Risks from Perkins Coie LLP — President Donald Trump issued an executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie LLP, citing its alleged involvement in activities undermining democratic elections and engaging in racial discrimination. The order mandates a review of security clearances held by Perkins Coie employees, cessation of government services to the firm, and scrutiny of government contracts involving the firm. It also directs the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to review large law firms for compliance with non-discrimination laws. The order aims to align federal contracting and personnel policies with national security interests and anti-discrimination laws.
• Trump administration suspends security clearances and restricts access for Perkins Coie LLP employees — The White House issued a fact sheet announcing that President Trump signed an executive order suspending security clearances held by Perkins Coie LLP employees pending review, halting government material and services to the firm, restricting employee access to government buildings, prohibiting federal hiring of its staff, and directing termination of all federal contracts with the firm. The fact sheet characterizes the firm's legal work as "unethical and discriminatory" and references past litigation involving the firm.
• Trump signed executive order targeting law firm Perkins Coie LLP with security clearance suspensions, contract terminations, and personnel restrictions. — President Trump signed an executive order on March 6, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by Perkins Coie employees, terminate or review federal contracts with the firm, require contractors to disclose business relationships with Perkins Coie, restrict employee access to federal buildings, and limit hiring of Perkins Coie staff. The order cites the firm's 2016 work on the Steele dossier, litigation against election laws, and diversity hiring practices as justification. The Attorney General and EEOC Chair are directed to investigate large law firms for alleged racial discrimination in hiring and promotion.
• Trump suspends security clearances for law firm employees — President Trump signed an executive order suspending security clearances for employees of a law firm that previously worked for Hillary Clinton. The order also urges agency heads to terminate contracts with the firm, raising legal and ethical concerns.

Supporting reports

• Elon Musk funds Wisconsin Supreme Court race — Elon Musk is spending millions to support Republican candidate Brad Schimel in the Wisconsin Supreme Court election. Musk's political action committee is contributing $1 million, and another group he funds is spending $1.6 million on ads against Schimel's opponent, Susan Crawford. This election could influence major cases on abortion, union rights, and election law. Musk's involvement is seen as an attempt to expand his political influence and potentially affect future legal decisions that could benefit his business interests, such as Tesla's pending lawsuit in Wisconsin.

Supporting reports

• Democratic Party sues Trump administration over FEC control — The Democratic Party filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, contending that the president's attempt to control independent executive-branch agencies, including the Federal Election Commission, violates federal election law. This legal action addresses concerns about the independence of regulatory agencies.

Supporting reports

• Trump falsely claims election fraud at CPAC — At the Conservative Political Action Conference, President Donald Trump falsely claimed that he received "much more" than 77 million votes in the 2024 presidential election and accused Democrats of cheating. This statement perpetuates misinformation about the integrity of the electoral process and undermines public trust in democratic institutions.

Supporting reports

• FEC chair removed by Trump — Federal Election Commission chair Ellen Weintraub was removed from her role by President Trump, a move she claims was illegal. This action raises concerns about the independence and integrity of the FEC.
• Trump Purges Federal Employees — President Trump continued his purge of federal employees, firing Ellen Weintraub of the Federal Elections Commission and Colleen Shogan, the Archivist of the United States, both of whom had roles in overseeing electoral integrity and presidential records.

Supporting reports

• FEC Chair refuses to leave position — Ellen Weintraub, Chair of the Federal Election Commission, is refusing to leave her position despite being fired by President Trump. Weintraub, who was appointed to a six-year term in 2022, argues that there is a legal process for replacing FEC commissioners, which has not been followed. Her refusal comes amid ongoing investigations into the President's campaign activities.

Supporting reports

• Senate Democrats protest against Russell Vought's nomination — Senate Democrats held an all-night protest against Russell Vought, Trump's nominee to lead the White House budget office, due to his role in Project 2025, a conservative blueprint for Trump's second term. Despite their efforts, Vought was confirmed along party lines. The protest was part of a broader Democratic strategy to oppose Trump's agenda, which includes a now-rescinded order freezing federal loans and grants. Activists were pleased with the Democrats' increased resolve to challenge the administration's actions.
• Senate urged to block Russell Vought's OMB appointment — There is a concerted effort to pressure the Senate to block the appointment of Russell Vought as Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Vought, associated with Project 2025, is accused of planning to staff the government with loyalists and undermine agencies by withholding congressionally-allocated resources. His refusal to testify that he would prioritize the Constitution over Trump's demands has intensified opposition. The Senate is expected to vote on his confirmation soon, and public campaigns are urging Senators to reject his nomination.
• Senate filibuster against Russell Vought — Democratic senators, led by Chuck Schumer, initiated a filibuster to block the confirmation of Russell Vought as the director of the Office of Management and Budget. The senators expressed concerns that Vought's proposals would threaten critical federal funding for programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.
• Legislation introduced to counter Musk's actions — Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Hakeem Jeffries announced the introduction of legislation aimed at stopping Elon Musk's actions regarding the Treasury's payment systems. The proposed legislation, titled "Stop the Steal," seeks to protect Americans from potential abuses stemming from Musk's control over government financial operations.
• Senate to vote on Russell Vought's confirmation — The Senate is scheduled to vote on the confirmation of Russell Vought as the head of the Office of Management and Budget. Vought is criticized for his role in the Project 2025 agenda, which opponents argue could lead to policies detrimental to working families and democratic governance.
• Judge Griffin's Attempt to Overturn Supreme Court Election — Judge Griffin is reportedly attempting to overturn the results of a Supreme Court election in North Carolina by seeking to discard 65,000 votes. This action has been characterized as an outrageous power grab by the NC Supreme Court. The situation has prompted a campaign by Common Cause NC to raise awareness and ensure that affected voters are informed. The campaign highlights the importance of public vigilance and participation in safeguarding electoral integrity.
• Judge Griffins attempts to alter NC Supreme Court election — Judge Griffins is reportedly attempting to alter the outcome of the North Carolina Supreme Court election by targeting 60,000 votes, potentially affecting the election of Justice Alison Riggs. This action has prompted calls for public engagement and court attendance to ensure the integrity of the election process.
• Protests against government actions held nationwide — Nationwide protests have been held in response to recent government actions, including the seizure of the US Treasury and the potential confirmation of Russell Vought. These protests are described as peaceful expressions of First Amendment rights, with significant public participation.

Supporting reports

• Trial court rejected Griffin's ballot challenges in February 2025 — In February 2025, a North Carolina trial court rejected Jefferson Griffin's legal challenges against 60,000 ballots that he claimed were invalid due to missing driver's license or Social Security numbers on voter registration forms and alleged ineligibility of military and overseas voters. The trial court's rejection of Griffin's case was consistent with the State Board of Elections' earlier rejection of the same claims, but Griffin appealed the ruling to the Court of Appeals, which subsequently ruled in his favor.
• Judge Griffin's Attempt to Overturn Supreme Court Election — Judge Griffin is reportedly attempting to overturn the results of a Supreme Court election in North Carolina by seeking to discard 65,000 votes. This action has been characterized as an outrageous power grab by the NC Supreme Court. The situation has prompted a campaign by Common Cause NC to raise awareness and ensure that affected voters are informed. The campaign highlights the importance of public vigilance and participation in safeguarding electoral integrity.
• Judge Griffins attempts to alter NC Supreme Court election — Judge Griffins is reportedly attempting to alter the outcome of the North Carolina Supreme Court election by targeting 60,000 votes, potentially affecting the election of Justice Alison Riggs. This action has prompted calls for public engagement and court attendance to ensure the integrity of the election process.

Supporting reports

• Judge Griffin attempts to overturn election of Justice Alison Riggs — Judge Griffin is attempting to overturn the election of Justice Alison Riggs to the North Carolina Supreme Court. This legal battle is ongoing, with court dates set and public support mobilizing to defend the election outcome. The case highlights issues of judicial independence and electoral integrity in the face of challenges to democratic processes.
• North Carolina GOP attempts to overturn election results — In North Carolina, the GOP is attempting to overturn the election results for the NC Supreme Court seat won by Justice Alison Riggs. This effort involves Judge Griffin's attempt to discard 60,000 votes, which has sparked significant opposition from organizations like Common Cause NC and Emancipate. These groups are mobilizing efforts to raise awareness and counteract the GOP's actions, which are seen as an attempt to undermine democratic processes similar to tactics used in the 2020 election.

Supporting reports

• RNC and North Carolina GOP join Griffin's ballot challenge — The Republican National Committee, the North Carolina GOP, and the Wake County Republican Party joined Jefferson Griffin's legal challenge, contesting 60,000 ballots in the 2024 election. They argue that the state's voter registration form did not clearly state that providing a driver's license or social security number was mandatory, affecting the validity of these ballots. This legal action is part of a broader effort to contest the election results.

Supporting reports

• DNC intervenes in GOP's ballot challenge case — The Democratic National Committee intervened in the case brought by the RNC and North Carolina GOP, asking a court to block their request to discard thousands of ballots. The DNC cited state and federal laws that protect the votes of eligible voters despite minor registration application issues. This intervention is part of the ongoing legal battle over the 2024 election results in North Carolina.
• RNC and North Carolina GOP join Griffin's ballot challenge — The Republican National Committee, the North Carolina GOP, and the Wake County Republican Party joined Jefferson Griffin's legal challenge, contesting 60,000 ballots in the 2024 election. They argue that the state's voter registration form did not clearly state that providing a driver's license or social security number was mandatory, affecting the validity of these ballots. This legal action is part of a broader effort to contest the election results.
• Trump conditions aid to California on voter ID laws — Former President Donald Trump stated he would not agree to provide federal aid to California unless the state adopted mandatory voter ID laws, which would effectively end mail-in voting. This condition was mentioned during his visit to California to address wildfire relief efforts.
• Trump threatens to withhold wildfire aid from California — President Trump threatened on January 24, 2025, to withhold wildfire aid from California unless the state introduces voter ID requirements and makes changes to water policy. This threat has been criticized as an abuse of federal power and raises concerns about the use of aid as leverage for political gain.

Supporting reports

• DNC intervenes in GOP's ballot challenge case — The Democratic National Committee intervened in the case brought by the RNC and North Carolina GOP, asking a court to block their request to discard thousands of ballots. The DNC cited state and federal laws that protect the votes of eligible voters despite minor registration application issues. This intervention is part of the ongoing legal battle over the 2024 election results in North Carolina.
• North Carolina Virtual Town Hall on Election Overturn Efforts — A virtual town hall is scheduled for January 23 in North Carolina to address GOP efforts to overturn the election of Supreme Court Justice Alison Riggs. This event aims to inform and mobilize citizens against attempts to challenge the legitimacy of a duly elected official. The town hall will provide a platform for discussing the implications of these efforts on the state's judicial system and democratic processes.
• Challenges to NC Supreme Court Justice election — Challenges have been raised against the election of NC Supreme Court Justice Alison Riggs, with concerns that the GOP is attempting to overturn the election results. This situation is characterized as a "five alarm fire" for democracy by Marc Elias, indicating the potential for similar attempts in future elections, including the 2028 Presidential election.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order revokes security clearances for election interference — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14152, revoking security clearances of 51 former intelligence officials and John R. Bolton for election interference and improper disclosure of sensitive information. The order aims to prevent the Intelligence Community from engaging in partisan politics and influencing U.S. elections. The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the CIA Director, is tasked with implementing the revocations and reporting additional inappropriate activities within 90 days.
• Trump strips security clearances — On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order intending to strip security clearances from 51 individuals he accused of election interference related to Hunter Biden’s laptop. This action raises concerns about the politicization of security clearances.
• Trump issues executive order revoking security clearances — On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order revoking the security clearances of 50 former intelligence officials, including John R. Bolton, for their alleged involvement in election interference and improper disclosure of sensitive information. The order claims these individuals engaged in misleading political coordination with the Biden campaign during the 2020 election and improperly disclosed classified information. The Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the CIA Director, is tasked with implementing the revocations and reporting on any additional inappropriate activities within 90 days.
• White House signed executive order revoking security clearances of 50 named former officials — The White House issued an executive order on January 20, 2025, directing the revocation of active security clearances held by 50 named former government officials and intelligence professionals. The order states that these individuals signed a 2020 letter regarding reporting on President Biden's son's laptop, which the order characterizes as "misleading and inappropriate political coordination" with the Biden campaign. The order also directs revocation of clearances for John Bolton, citing his memoir publication. The Director of National Intelligence is instructed to submit a report within 90 days on additional conduct and disciplinary recommendations.