Trump Action Archive

A searchable record of documented actions, compiled weekly from public sources.

5 events matching

Export CSVResearcher JSONAnalyst Newest first · Oldest first
Filtering Category: Institutions and Governance × Attack target: Dissent & Protest × Trait: Dissent is reframed as disorder, treason, or terrorism × Clear all ☆ Save this search
Tier 1 carried by a primary record Corroborated 2+ independent news desks Every result is verified and democracy-related.

Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions

Aug 6, 2026 Georgia Fort's attorneys sought dismissal of charges over protest documentation on First Amendment grounds Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

The dismissal motion challenges prosecutorial use of false claims and law enforcement pressure against a journalist covering a protest.

Independently corroborated by3 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • DOJ official encouraged prosecutors to "go big" and "go loud" in prosecuting protesters — A top Justice Department official encouraged prosecutors to "go big" and "go loud" when pursuing criminal charges against people who protested against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, according to reporting. The Minneapolis case is one of several the DOJ has brought across the U.S. leveling charges against wide swaths of protesters, including cases in Texas where prosecutors secured decades-long sentences for nine people protesting outside an ICE facility.
  • Law enforcement provided false information in criminal case against journalist Georgia Fort — Federal law enforcement officials, including Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), provided false information to federal judges in at least 15 search warrant applications and to a grand jury in the case against independent journalist Georgia Fort, who was charged alongside nearly 40 others after interrupting a Minnesota church service to protest an ICE official serving as a pastor. The Justice Department later conceded the false claims. Fort's lawyers filed motions on Thursday seeking dismissal, arguing the prosecution violates the First Amendment, fails to state an actual crime, and is vindictive retaliation against her journalism.
  • Prosecutors charged journalist Georgia Fort with conspiracy to interfere with religious rights for documenting anti-ICE protest — Journalist Georgia Fort was charged with conspiracy to interfere with the religious rights of parishioners after she entered and documented a protest at Cities church in St Paul, Minnesota, where demonstrators interrupted a service upon learning an ICE official was a pastor. Fort's lawyers argue the prosecution is vindictive retaliation targeting her for her journalism and for amplifying a message the government opposes, violating the First Amendment.
  • Prosecutors made false claims in search warrant applications regarding protest conduct — In search warrant applications, prosecutors claimed a congregant had broken her arm during the protest when she had not, and made other false characterizations of Fort's conduct, including claims she conspired with others in advance when evidence showed she arrived late and was not present for planning discussions. Prosecutors also claimed Fort blocked a van from leaving when her own livestream showed the van left easily.
  • Journalist Georgia Fort indicted for covering anti-ICE protest; seeks dismissal on First Amendment grounds — Attorneys for Twin Cities journalist Georgia Fort asked a federal judge to dismiss charges against her for covering an anti-ICE protest at a St. Paul church, arguing the indictment violates her First Amendment rights. Fort was indicted alongside former CNN host Don Lemon and dozens of protesters on charges of conspiring against the right of religious freedom at a place of worship. Her attorneys argue the 19-page indictment contains no allegation of physical force, threats, or blocking the church entrance, and that her role was to observe and document. Magistrate Judge John Docherty twice refused to sign search warrants for Fort's and Lemon's YouTube accounts, finding they violated the Privacy Protection Act of 1980. A government attorney acknowledged a mischaracterization in an affidavit at a July hearing.
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 81 – 2026-08-01–2026-08-07 wk81_IG_037
Mar 29, 2026 Nine activists convicted were convicted on terrorism and related charges in Texas for a 2025 protest outside an ICE facility Corroborated Institutions and Governance

Federal prosecutors secured terrorism-related convictions of protesters despite the trial judge noting no organizational nexus, setting a precedent for labeling dissent as terrorism.

Independently corroborated by3 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Nine activists convicted on terrorism charges in Texas ICE protest case — Nine activists were convicted in Texas federal court on terrorism and related charges stemming from a March 2025 protest outside an ICE facility near Fort Worth. Eight were convicted of riot, explosives, and material support to terrorists; one (Benjamin Song) was convicted of attempted murder after shooting a police officer; a ninth was convicted for moving zines days after the protest. The Trump administration framed the verdict as vindication of its campaign against "antifa," though legal experts and the trial judge noted the charges had no organizational nexus and the terrorism label was legally irrelevant to the convictions.
Verified: Corroborated — 2+ independent news desks Week 63 – 2026-03-28–2026-04-03 wk63_IG_007
Oct 20, 2025 Mike Johnson held a press conference dismissing peaceful No Kings protests as un-American Corroborated Institutions and Governance

Congressional leadership publicly delegitimized a mass peaceful protest, characterizing dissent as extremist rather than legitimate civic expression.

Independently corroborated by5 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • House Republicans held press conference dismissing No Kings protests as un-American — Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Whip Tom Emmer, and Rep. Chip Roy held a press conference during a shutdown to attack the No Kings Day protests held the previous weekend. They characterized the demonstrations as a "hate America rally," claimed protesters were celebrating the death of Republicans, and accused Democrats of promoting Marxists and Islamists. The statements were made despite the protests being peaceful and drawing an estimated 5.5 million participants.
Verified: Corroborated — 2+ independent news desks Week 40 – 2025-10-18–2025-10-24 wk40_IG_009
Oct 16, 2025 Ted Cruz introduced legislation to authorize RICO prosecution of funding sources for the No Kings protests Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

Proposing organized-crime prosecution tools against protest funding represents an attempt to criminalize political opposition and chill assembly rights.

Primary sourceA record that carries the claim alone
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Sen. Ted Cruz introduced legislation to prosecute funding sources of No Kings protests using RICO statutes — Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) announced on Fox News that he has introduced legislation authorizing the Department of Justice to use RICO statutes to prosecute entities funding the No Kings rallies, claiming without evidence that George Soros and his network are behind the funding. The statement conflates protest funding with potential riot activity and proposes using organized-crime prosecution tools against political opposition groups.
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 39 – 2025-10-11–2025-10-17 wk39_IG_041
Mar 4, 2025 House of Representatives censured Rep. Al Green for disrupting Trump's joint address to Congress Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance

The censure of a member who protested during a presidential address raised questions about the use of formal discipline to suppress dissent.

Independently corroborated by7 independent news desks
Supporting reportingSurfacings — do not carry alone

Supporting reports

  • Congressman Al Green removed from Trump address — During a joint session of Congress, Congressman Al Green was removed from the House chamber after repeatedly interrupting President Donald Trump's speech. House Speaker Mike Johnson ordered Green's removal after he shouted "He has no mandate" and refused to sit down. The sergeant-at-arms carried out the removal, marking a rare event in congressional history. Green, a vocal critic of Trump, had previously announced his intention to file articles of impeachment against the president. The incident occurred amidst a backdrop of Democratic protests during Trump's address.
  • Rep. Al Green removed from House chamber — Democratic Rep. Al Green was removed from the House chamber after disrupting President Trump's address to Congress. Green had previously announced plans to file articles of impeachment against Trump, highlighting tensions between the executive and legislative branches.
  • House member removed from Congress chamber — During Donald Trump's speech to Congress, Representative Al Green, a Democrat from Texas, was removed from the chamber after shouting at the president. Green's outburst came in response to Trump's claims of having a significant electoral mandate. The Republican Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, instructed the sergeant at arms to remove Green after he refused to maintain decorum. This incident occurred amidst a broader protest by Democrats, some of whom walked out wearing "resist" shirts.
  • Al Green removed from Trump address after heckling — During President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress, Congressman Al Green was removed from the chamber after heckling the president. Green shouted, "You have no mandate to cut Medicaid!" which prompted House Speaker Mike Johnson to order the House serjeant at arms to escort him out. This incident occurred amidst a highly charged atmosphere, with Republicans cheering and Democrats expressing dissent through various forms of protest.
  • House votes to censure Rep. Al Green — The House of Representatives voted to censure Democratic Rep. Al Green for disrupting President Trump's address to Congress. Ten Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the resolution, reflecting internal party divisions and the contentious political climate.
  • House censure of Al Green for interrupting Trump's joint address — On March 5, 2025, Democrat Al Green interrupted President Trump's joint address to Congress, shouting "he has no mandate" while pumping a walking cane. Speaker Mike Johnson had Green forcibly removed. Two days later, on March 7, the House passed Republican Dan Newhouse's censure resolution against Green with 210 votes in favor (all Republicans plus 10 Democrats). Green was required to stand before the House dais as Johnson read the censure. This was the only censure to pass in 2025.
  • House votes to censure Al Green — The US House of Representatives voted to censure Representative Al Green for disrupting President Trump's joint session address. The vote, which included support from some Democrats, accused Green of breaching proper conduct. This censure reflects the political tensions and disciplinary measures within Congress regarding decorum and conduct during official proceedings.
Verified: Tier 1 primary record Week 7 – 2025-03-01–2025-03-07 wk07_IG_029