Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Feb 26, 2026 Protect Democracy filed a lawsuit alleging DHS agents classified lawful ICE observers as domestic terrorists in a tracking database Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
Allegations that citizens documenting federal enforcement are being labeled extremists represent retaliation against lawful oversight and chill constitutionally protected observation.
Supporting reports
- Federal lawsuit alleges DHS agents labeled observers "domestic terrorists" — Legal nonprofit Protect Democracy filed a federal class-action lawsuit alleging that DHS agents are retaliating against people who lawfully observe and record federal immigration enforcement. The lawsuit references a viral video from Portland, Maine, in which an agent told an observer: "Cause we have a nice little database. And now you're considered a domestic terrorist." DHS denied the database exists but acknowledged it "monitors and investigates" threats. In Minnesota, dozens of people submitted sworn declarations to the ACLU stating federal agents told them filming enforcement operations was illegal or constituted interference.
- Federal judge documented immigration agents disregarding judicial directives — A Bush-appointed federal judge compiled nearly one hundred documented instances in which immigration agents disregarded judicial directives within a single month, noting the list was almost certainly incomplete. A separate judge stated publicly that the vast majority of people brought before his court had lawful status. A government attorney was held in civil contempt, and another described arriving with no training and no guidance. Hundreds of agents remain in operation, with on-the-ground observers reporting operations shifting toward communities with less visibility.
- Legal observers classified using language associated with violent extremism — A new federal lawsuit alleges that legal observers monitoring immigration enforcement operations are being classified using language associated with violent extremism. A former agency attorney testified that officer training was cut by over 40%, including constitutional law and use-of-force instruction.
Aug 25, 2025 Trump signed an executive order directing prosecution of flag burning despite Supreme Court precedent protecting it as speech Tier 1 · Primary Civil Rights and Dissent
Directing prosecutors to criminalize a constitutionally protected form of protest tested First Amendment limits on executive authority.
Supporting reports
- Trump signs executive order directing prosecution of flag burning as incitement or fighting words — President Trump signed Executive Order 14341 on August 25, 2025, directing the Attorney General to prioritize enforcement of federal, state, and local criminal laws against flag desecration, framing such acts as potential incitement to violence or fighting words. The order instructs the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security to deny or revoke immigration benefits for foreign nationals engaged in flag desecration. The order acknowledges Supreme Court precedent (Texas v. Johnson) protecting flag burning as speech but asserts the administration will prosecute flag desecration under content-neutral laws and pursue litigation to clarify First Amendment exceptions.
- Trump ordered DOJ to prosecute flag burning — Trump ordered the Department of Justice to prosecute anyone who burns an American flag, claiming such individuals would automatically face one year in prison. This order contradicts the 1989 Supreme Court ruling in Texas v. Johnson, which established flag burning as protected First Amendment speech.
- Trump announced executive order directing DOJ to prosecute flag burning — Trump held a press event in the Oval Office and announced an executive order instructing the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute instances of flag burning. Trump claimed burning a flag would result in one year in jail and a criminal record. White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf clarified that the order directs DOJ to prosecute flag burning only where it constitutes criminal activity (such as burning someone else's property) and does not violate First Amendment protections, since the Supreme Court previously ruled flag burning as political speech is constitutionally protected.
- Trump issues executive order directing prosecution of flag burning — President Trump issued an executive order on August 25, 2025, directing the Attorney General to prioritize enforcement of federal, state, and local laws against flag desecration. The order instructs the DOJ to prosecute flag burning as a crime where it violates content-neutral laws (disorderly conduct, open burning, property destruction) and authorizes the State Department, Attorney General, and DHS to deny or revoke visas, residence permits, and immigration benefits for foreign nationals engaged in flag desecration. The order acknowledges Supreme Court precedent in Texas v. Johnson but asserts authority to prosecute flag burning that incites imminent lawless action or constitutes "fighting words."
- White House signed executive order directing prosecution of flag desecration — The White House signed Executive Order 14341 on August 25, 2025, directing the Attorney General to prioritize enforcement of criminal and civil laws against flag desecration, including violent crimes, hate crimes, and property crimes. The order instructs the Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Secretary of Homeland Security to deny or revoke visas, residence permits, and immigration benefits for foreign nationals engaged in flag desecration. The order acknowledges Supreme Court precedent in Texas v. Johnson but asserts authority to prosecute flag burning that incites imminent lawless action or constitutes "fighting words."
- Trump signs flag-burning criminalization order — Trump signed an executive order to criminalize the burning of a US flag, an action the Supreme Court ruled was protected under the First Amendment in 1989. The order directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to prioritize prosecuting flag desecration cases and allows officials to deny or revoke visas and residence permits for immigrants who burn flags.
- White House issues fact sheet on executive order prosecuting flag desecration — The White House published a fact sheet on August 25, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump directing the Attorney General to prosecute flag desecration "to the fullest extent permissible" and to "pursue litigation to clarify the scope of First Amendment in this area." The order also directs the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security and the Attorney General to deny, prohibit, terminate, or revoke visas, residence permits, naturalization proceedings, and other immigration benefits for foreign nationals determined to have desecrated the flag, or to seek their removal from the United States.
- Trump signs executive order directing prosecution of flag burning as protest — On Monday, August 26, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order instructing U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue criminal charges against individuals who burn American flags during protests. The order directs prosecutors to explore alternative charges such as disturbing the peace or environmental violations. This action attempts to circumvent the 1989 Supreme Court ruling in Texas v. Johnson, which established that flag burning constitutes protected political speech under the First Amendment.
- Trump signed executive order banning flag burning — Trump issued an executive order criminalizing flag burning. The order drew immediate criticism from conservative legal scholars and right-wing media figures who noted that the Supreme Court had settled in Texas v. Johnson that flag burning constitutes protected free speech under the First Amendment. Multiple conservative commentators, including Justice Antonin Scalia's son, cited the constitutional prohibition on such restrictions.
- Trump issued executive order criminalizing flag burning — President Trump issued an executive order directing arrest and prosecution of Americans for burning the American flag, despite a standing Supreme Court ruling protecting flag-burning as free speech under the First Amendment. Although Trump's order acknowledged the SCOTUS ruling, the Secret Service arrested one man who burned a flag near the White House in protest of the order.
Apr 25, 2025 FBI arrested Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan for allegedly obstructing an ICE arrest in her courtroom Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
The unprecedented arrest of a sitting judge for a discretionary courtroom decision represents a direct attack on judicial independence and separation of powers.
Supporting reports
- FBI arrests Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan on obstruction charges related to immigration enforcement — The FBI arrested Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan on Friday morning at her courthouse on charges of obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest. Federal authorities alleged that Dugan intentionally misdirected immigration agents seeking to apprehend Eduardo Flores Ruiz, an undocumented immigrant scheduled to appear in her courtroom. Dugan ordered the agents to leave, citing lack of a judicial warrant, and escorted Flores Ruiz to a non-public area. She was released after a brief court appearance; her next hearing is scheduled for May 15. The arrest marks the first publicly known instance of the Trump administration criminally charging a local official for allegedly obstructing immigration enforcement.
- Judge Hannah Dugan arrested by FBI for allowing defendant to exit courtroom — Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested by FBI agents on April 25, 2025, in her Milwaukee courtroom and charged with obstruction. She had allegedly allowed a man to leave through back doors of her courtroom in response to immigration officers waiting to arrest him outside. FBI Director Kash Patel posted comments and a photograph of her arrest on X, and digitally altered photographs of Dugan in tears proliferated on social media. Trump reposted an image from Libs of TikTok.
- FBI arrested Judge Hannah Dugan — FBI agents arrested Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan at the courthouse on charges of obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest. The arrest followed an April 18 incident in which Judge Dugan, during a pre-trial conference for an undocumented immigrant charged with misdemeanor battery, questioned ICE agents' administrative warrant and allowed the defendant to exit via an alternate route, enabling him to flee before agents apprehended him. FBI Director Kash Patel initially posted about the arrest on social media before deleting the post.
- Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan arrested by FBI for obstruction of justice — Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested by the FBI on charges of obstruction of justice for allegedly helping a migrant evade arrest by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. According to FBI Director Kash Patel, Judge Dugan misdirected federal agents away from Eduardo Flores Ruiz during an ICE operation in her courthouse, allowing Ruiz to exit through a jury room back door. Ruiz was apprehended after a short foot chase outside the building.
Apr 25, 2025 Attorney General Bondi publicly attacked Judge Dugan and warned of prosecuting officials who obstruct immigration enforcement Corroborated Civil Rights and Dissent
A sitting Attorney General's media attacks on a judge before trial threatened judicial independence and the appearance of impartial law enforcement.
Supporting reports
- Attorney General Bondi publicly attacked Judge Dugan on Fox News — Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared on Fox News Channel to comment on Judge Dugan's arrest, calling judges "deranged" and stating they are "not beyond and above the law." Bondi warned that the administration would prosecute anyone "harboring a fugitive," framing judicial discretion in immigration cases as criminal conduct.