Narrow these 7 — tap a value to filter:
Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Sep 11, 2026 Missouri Republican legislators threatened impeachment of state supreme court justices over the redistricting contempt ruling Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
Lawmakers attempted to coerce the judiciary into abandoning enforcement of voter-approved redistricting protections, an unrealized but serious threat to judicial independence.
Supporting reports
- Missouri Republican legislators threatened impeachment of state Supreme Court justices over redistricting ruling — Missouri Republican lawmakers sent a letter threatening impeachment of state Supreme Court justices if they held Secretary of State Hoskins in contempt for defying a court order on redistricting. The letter, sent before the U.S. Supreme Court intervened, insisted that Hoskins comply with the federal judge's order and questioned whether the state Supreme Court understood that federal law is "supreme." The impeachment threat was ultimately not carried out.
Sep 11, 2026 Utah Republicans threatened impeachment of a judge enforcing a constitutional gerrymandering ban, then packed the state supreme court Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
When impeachment threats failed to alter a judge's redistricting rulings, lawmakers restructured the court itself to overturn constitutional protections against gerrymandering.
Supporting reports
- Utah Republicans threatened to impeach judge over gerrymandering enforcement — Utah Republicans threatened to impeach a state judge for enforcing a constitutional ban on gerrymandering. When the impeachment threat did not succeed in stopping the judge's rulings, Republicans subsequently packed the state Supreme Court to overturn the judge's decisions and allow gerrymandered districts.
- Utah Republicans packed state Supreme Court to overturn redistricting protections — After their impeachment threat against a judge enforcing a constitutional ban on gerrymandering failed, Utah Republicans packed the state Supreme Court. This court-packing effort was designed to overturn judicial protections against gerrymandered districts and allow partisan redistricting to proceed.
Jun 11, 2026 US House of Representatives failed to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act before its expiration Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
Congress allowed a major surveillance law to lapse amid disputes over a controversial intelligence nominee, leaving warrantless surveillance authority in legal limbo.
Supporting reports
- US House blocks extension of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) section 702 — The US House of Representatives failed to pass a short-term extension of FISA section 702 in a 198-218 vote on June 11, 2026. Democrats blocked the renewal in protest of Trump's appointment of Bill Pulte, a major Republican donor with no national security experience, as acting director of national intelligence. The law will lapse on June 12, though a FISA court certification allows collection to continue under existing orders through approximately March 2027.
- House rejected FISA renewal measure — Nineteen Republicans joined all but seven Democrats to reject a measure to extend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which expires on June 12, 2026. Under the fast-track procedure used by House Speaker Mike Johnson, the measure required a two-thirds majority but failed 218 to 198, not reaching even a simple majority. The rejection reflected concerns about Pulte's potential oversight of the program.
- Congress fails to reauthorize Section 702 of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act before deadline — Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which permits warrantless collection of communications involving foreigners outside the US and incidentally sweeps up American communications, was set to expire on June 12, 2026. Congress failed to reauthorize it by the deadline. House Speaker Mike Johnson blocked votes on reform amendments, particularly a warrant requirement for surveilling Americans' communications, refusing to allow longer extensions that included such reforms. The program continues operating under existing court certifications through March 2027, but the statutory authorization lapsed.
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act lapses — The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which grants the executive branch broad surveillance powers, lapsed on June 12 after Congress failed to pass a short-term extension. The lapse occurred amid Senate outrage over Pulte's potential appointment as acting DNI. Some Republicans attempted to pass a two-week extension, but their efforts failed.
Jun 3, 2026 House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution directing an end to hostilities with Iran Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
The House reasserted its constitutional war-powers authority in a rare bipartisan rebuke of unilateral executive military action.
Supporting reports
- House passes war powers resolution directing end to Iran hostilities — The House passed a war powers resolution directing the president to end U.S. hostilities with Iran absent congressional authorization. The vote was 215 to 208, with four Republicans—Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett, and Warren Davidson—joining every Democrat. The measure is a concurrent resolution, so its legal force is disputed, and it now moves to the Senate, but it puts the chamber on record after months in which similar efforts had been blocked or failed on tie votes.
- House advances Ukraine aid measure — Shortly after passing the Iran war powers resolution, the House advanced a measure to aid Ukraine in its war to repel Russia's invasion by a vote of 218 to 204. If the measure passes the House and Senate, it will provide $8 billion in loans and $300 million in security aid to Ukraine.
- House passes war powers resolution on Iran — The House of Representatives passed a resolution, introduced by Democrats, directing President Trump either to stop further strikes against Iran or to obtain congressional approval for military action. The resolution passed 215 to 208, despite Speaker Mike Johnson's warning that it was "very dangerous" and would "weaken" Trump's ability to resolve the conflict. The vote occurred after Johnson had sent House members home early before Memorial Day to prevent the measure from passing. According to a New York Times–Siena College poll, 64% of registered voters believe Trump's decision to go to war was wrong, while only 30% approve of it.
- US House passes war powers resolution to curb Trump's Iran authority — The US House of Representatives voted 215–208 to pass a war powers resolution requiring President Trump to seek congressional approval to continue military operations in Iran or withdraw US forces. Four Republicans voted with Democrats: Thomas Massie (Kentucky), Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania), Warren Davidson (Ohio), and Tom Barrett (Michigan). The resolution advances to the Senate, where a similar measure previously gained bipartisan support. The vote marks the fourth House attempt to enforce the 1973 War Powers Resolution's 90-day threshold, which Trump's administration has rejected by citing a ceasefire in place since April 8.
Mar 8, 2026 Trump threatened to veto all legislation unless Congress passed a restrictive voting bill Tier 1 · Primary Power and Authority
The president used his signing power as leverage to coerce Congress into passing legislation that would tighten voter ID and citizenship requirements, pressuring the separation of powers.
Supporting reports
- Trump posted demands to condition legislation on passage of voting restrictions bill — Trump posted on social media that he will not sign other bills until the "SAVE AMERICA ACT" is passed, demanding voter ID requirements, proof of citizenship, elimination of mail-in ballots except for military/illness/disability, prohibition of transgender athletes in women's sports, and bans on gender-affirming care for minors. He stated the bill "supersedes everything else" and "MUST GO TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE."
- Trump threatens legislative veto unless Congress passes strict voter ID act — On Sunday, President Trump posted on Truth Social that he will not sign any bills until Congress passes the Save America Act, a voting restriction measure. On Monday, he reiterated this demand at a Republican event in Miami, calling for proof of citizenship, elimination of mail-in ballots except in narrow cases, and unrelated provisions banning transgender participation in women's sports. The bill has passed the House but faces steep odds in the Senate due to the filibuster rule. Trump's threat represents an attempt to leverage executive power to force legislative action on a measure voting rights advocates say would disenfranchise millions of Americans.
- Trump announced refusal to sign legislation until Congress passes SAVE America Act — On Sunday, President Trump announced he would not sign any other legislation until Congress passes the SAVE America Act, which passed the House on February 11, 2026, by a vote of 218 to 213. The bill requires documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. A Center for American Progress analysis estimated that approximately 69 million American women and 4 million men lack birth certificates matching their current legal names due to marriage or name changes, and would be blocked from voting under the bill. The measure would also apply to routine voter registration updates and threatens election officials with civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance.
- Trump threatened to withhold bill signatures unless Senate passes SAVE Act — Trump posted on social media threatening that unless the Senate weakens the filibuster to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act over Democratic objections, he will not sign other bills. His message demanded voter ID and proof of citizenship requirements, elimination of mail-in ballots except for military and disability cases, and other restrictions. The message also included demands unrelated to voting, including bans on transgender medical care for minors and transgender athletes in women's sports.
- Trump threatens Congress over voting legislation — Donald Trump threatened Republican senators on social media, stating he would not sign any bills unless they passed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, which includes strict voter ID requirements and limits on mail-in ballots. Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer criticized the act as a modern form of Jim Crow that would disenfranchise millions.
- House passes Save America act with restrictive voting provisions — The House approved the Save America act, legislation requiring documented proof of U.S. citizenship to register and vote, voter ID requirements, prohibitions on mail voting, bans on gender-affirming care for minors, and restrictions on transgender women in sports. The bill would allow private parties to sue election officials and impose criminal penalties for registration without citizenship documentation. Voting rights advocates warned the measure would prevent millions of Americans from voting, particularly affecting married women whose documents may not match current names.
- Trump demands Senate majority leader alter filibuster rules to force vote on Save America act — Donald Trump publicly pressured Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune to change Senate filibuster rules to force a vote on the Save America act, a bill that would impose strict voter ID and citizenship documentation requirements, ban mail voting, and restrict transgender medical care and sports participation. Trump declared he would not sign any other legislation until the bill reached his desk. Thune refused, citing lack of votes, but some Republicans including John Cornyn reversed prior positions to support rule changes to advance the bill.
- Trump escalated pressure on Congress to pass SAVE America Act — Trump escalated pressure on Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, which would require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. Court records indicate that approximately 69 million American women do not have a birth certificate matching their current legal name, often due to marriage, making compliance with such a requirement difficult for a large eligible voter population.
- Save America act introduced with expansive voting restrictions and election worker liability provisions — The Save America act, a rebranded expansion of last year's failed Safeguard American Voter Eligibility act, includes four major provisions: mandatory documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration and any registration changes; strict photo ID requirements for all voting methods including mail ballots; criminal penalties and private right of action against election officials who register voters without citizenship proof; and mandatory transfer of state voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security for comparison against federal benefit eligibility databases. The bill would take immediate effect upon signature, requiring states to overhaul voter registration systems mid-election cycle.
- Trump vows to block all legislation until Senate votes on Save America voting restrictions bill — Donald Trump announced he will not sign any other legislation until Republicans pass the Save America act, a sweeping voting restrictions bill that would impose documentary proof of citizenship requirements, strict voter ID mandates for mail and in-person voting, criminal liability for election officials, and mandatory transfer of state voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security. The Senate is scheduled to vote next week but lacks the 60 votes needed to overcome the filibuster, making passage unlikely. The bill would take effect immediately upon presidential signature and would affect all American voters.
Oct 13, 2025 Mike Johnson convened the House for only 12 of 80 days and delayed swearing in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva Corroborated Institutions and Governance
Suspending normal House operations and refusing to seat an elected representative denied constituents representation and blocked a key discharge petition vote.
Supporting reports
- Speaker Johnson has convened House for only 12 of 80 days — Speaker Mike Johnson has called the House into session for only 12 of the last 80 days, with House Republicans receiving full pay and benefits during the extended shutdown. The extended absence has been characterized as "The Epstein Shutdown," with 68 days off with full pay over the 80-day period.
- House Speaker Johnson delays swearing in of Representative Grijalva — Speaker Mike Johnson has not sworn in Representative Raúl Grijalva despite her written request, according to a Fox reporter's question at a House Republican press conference. Johnson denied the delay was related to obstruction of the Epstein files release. Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes sent a letter to Johnson demanding he swear in Grijalva and stated her office is considering litigation to hold him accountable for the delay.
- Arizona attorney general accused Speaker Johnson of violating Constitution — Arizona's attorney general sent a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson accusing him of violating the Constitution by delaying the swearing-in ceremony of newly elected Democratic Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva, who is expected to be the key 218th vote on a petition that would force a vote to require the Trump administration to release the Epstein files.
- Rep-elect Adelita Grijalva demanded Speaker Johnson release Epstein files — Rep-elect Adelita Grijalva responded to Speaker Mike Johnson's dismissive "bless her heart" comment about her demand to be sworn in by accusing Johnson of stalling and obstruction. Grijalva stated she is the 218th signer of a discharge petition for the Epstein files and that Johnson's delay in swearing her in is politically motivated, driven by fear of Trump.
- House adjourned for 74 of last 86 days; zero committee hearings in October — Speaker Johnson has had the House adjourned for 74 of the last 86 days. The House Committee Calendar for October shows zero hearings or business being conducted. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries criticized House Republicans for being on vacation for three consecutive weeks during a government shutdown, stating they were in "legislative witness protection program" and not holding town halls or engaging with constituents.
- Speaker Johnson dismissed Arizona AG's lawsuit as a "publicity stunt" — When asked about the lawsuit filed by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes to compel him to swear in Rep. Adelita Grijalva, Speaker Johnson dismissed it as a "publicity stunt" by a "Democrat attorney general in Arizona" seeking a "national moment," claiming she had "nothing whatsoever to do with what's happening in Congress."
Jul 23, 2025 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship unconstitutional Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
An appellate panel affirmed that the order violates constitutional citizenship protections, advancing the case toward the Supreme Court.
Supporting reports
- Federal appeals court rules Trump's birthright citizenship executive order unconstitutional — The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that President Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship violates the Constitution. The three-judge panel affirmed an earlier district court decision from New Hampshire blocking the order. The ruling stated the executive order's proposed interpretation, which would deny citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. The case advances toward the US Supreme Court.
- Federal appeals court ruled birthright citizenship order unconstitutional — A federal appeals court ruled that Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, upholding a lower court's ruling that blocked it from going into effect nationwide.