Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• US appeals court halts White House ballroom construction, upholds preliminary injunction — The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a 2-1 ruling upholding a preliminary injunction that halts construction of Trump's $400 million White House ballroom project. The court found that the President lacks unilateral authority to demolish and rebuild the White House without Congressional authorization, stating each President is a "temporary tenant, not the owner." The ruling was placed on hold for two weeks to allow the administration to appeal to the Supreme Court.
• Federal Appeals Court Blocks Trump's White House Ballroom Project — A federal appeals court panel ruled against former President Trump's attempt to demolish parts of the White House to construct a massive ballroom, stating that such a project requires congressional approval. The decision halts the unprecedented project, emphasizing the need for legislative oversight in significant alterations to historic government properties.
• National Trust for Historic Preservation lawsuit against White House ballroom construction upheld by lower courts — The National Trust for Historic Preservation sued to halt construction of the White House ballroom, and lower courts ruled in favor of the organization, determining that the ballroom requires congressional approval. An appeals court on August 7, 2026, stated it was aware of no precedent in American history in which a president unilaterally demolished substantial portions of the White House that Congress authorized and taxpayers funded. Despite the court rulings, construction has continued with a 250-person crew working 20 hours daily, seven days a week.
• Federal appeals court blocks Trump's White House ballroom project — A federal appeals court has issued a ruling blocking former President Donald Trump's project to construct a ballroom at the White House. This decision represents a significant setback for Trump, who had been pursuing the project as part of his post-presidency initiatives. The court's ruling halts any further development on the ballroom, pending further legal proceedings or appeals.

Supporting reports

• FCC receives petitions to deny ABC license renewals; ex-officials warn of constitutional violation — The FCC, led by Chairman Brendan Carr, received petitions from conservative groups (Media Research Center and Center for American Rights) to deny license renewals for eight ABC-owned television stations. The petitions followed an "extremely unusual" early renewal order issued by the FCC in late April after criticism of ABC by Donald Trump. A coalition of former FCC chairs and senior officials from both parties filed a response warning the proceeding is "unprecedented" and violates the Communications Act and Constitution by seeking to censor speech and send a "chilling message" to broadcasters based on editorial content the administration dislikes.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration and states urge justices to allow full implementation of executive order on mail-in voting — The Trump administration, along with several states, has petitioned the Supreme Court to permit the complete enforcement of an executive order concerning mail-in voting. This request seeks to implement new restrictions on mail-in voting, which have been contested in lower courts. The administration argues that these measures are necessary to ensure election integrity, while opponents claim they could suppress voter turnout. The Supreme Court's decision on this matter will have significant implications for the upcoming elections and the broader debate over voting rights.
• Trump administration files emergency appeal to restrict mail-in voting — The Trump administration filed an emergency appeal asking the Supreme Court to allow the president's March executive order restricting mail-in voting to move forward ahead of November's midterm elections. The move came two days after a federal appeals court upheld a block on the order, writing that allowing it to take effect for the midterms "would sow confusion and threaten disenfranchisement of many eligible voters."
• Trump administration sought Supreme Court review of mail voting restrictions — The Trump administration petitioned the Supreme Court to allow enforcement of Trump's mail voting order, which directs Homeland Security to compile state citizenship lists and requires Postal Service rules limiting mail ballots to voters on those lists. Twenty-three states and Washington, D.C., had successfully challenged the restrictions, and the First Circuit declined to revive them. The petition seeks to overturn lower court decisions blocking the order's implementation.

Supporting reports

• Trump imposed tariffs under Section 301 of Trade Act of 1974 — When the 150-day deadline for Section 122 tariffs expired on Friday, July 25, 2026, Trump announced he was imposing tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which permits the president to impose tariffs on countries using forced labor. A senior administration official stated the tariffs address forced labor, a focus Trump has maintained for years. Law professor Barry Appleton noted that Section 301 allows permanent tariffs without congressional approval, suggesting the administration is seeking to bypass Congress entirely.
• Trump imposed tariffs under Section 122 of Trade Act of 1974 — After the Supreme Court invalidated the IEEPA-based tariffs, the Trump administration invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the president to impose tariffs in the case of an international financial emergency. These tariffs were limited to 150 days.
• Trump imposes new tariffs under emergency powers — President Trump announced the imposition of new tariffs on products from over 60 countries, claiming authority under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows tariffs in cases of forced labor. This follows a previous Supreme Court ruling that struck down earlier tariffs as unconstitutional. The administration's approach is seen as an attempt to bypass Congress's authority to raise revenue, which is constitutionally reserved for the legislative branch.
• Supreme Court struck down Trump tariffs as unconstitutional — The Supreme Court ruled that the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were unconstitutional. Following the ruling, Trump announced he would find alternative legal mechanisms to reimpose tariffs, stating "We have alternatives. Great alternatives."

Supporting reports

• President imposes tariffs on 60 economies for forced labor import enforcement failures — The President issued a memorandum directing the U.S. Trade Representative to impose tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 on goods from 60 economies found to have failed to impose or effectively enforce prohibitions on forced-labor imports. Tariff rates range from 10 percent to 12.5 percent ad valorem, with product-specific exemptions and tariff-rate quotas for certain textile and apparel goods. The action follows investigations initiated March 12, 2026, and determinations made June 2, 2026, that the practices of each economy are unreasonable and burden U.S. commerce.
• Trump issued presidential memorandum imposing tariffs on 60 economies for forced labor enforcement failures — President Trump issued a presidential memorandum directing the U.S. Trade Representative to impose tariffs ranging from 10 to 12.5 percent ad valorem on goods from 60 economies, including major trading partners (Canada, Mexico, European Union, Japan, China, India), based on determinations that these economies fail to impose or effectively enforce prohibitions on forced-labor-produced imports. The memorandum follows a March 2026 section 301 investigation and June 2026 determinations of actionable practices. Tariffs include exemptions for specified products and tariff-rate quotas for certain textile and apparel goods from Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, and Malaysia, to be established by September 1, 2026.
• Trump imposes new tariffs on 80+ countries citing forced labor — At 12:01 a.m. on July 24, Trump imposed tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on goods from more than 80 countries representing 99.4% of U.S. trade, claiming the countries produce goods using forced labor. The action invokes a different legal authority than the "Liberation Day" tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court in February 2026 and differs from tariffs imposed after that ruling. The time limit for imposing tariffs under the law used for the post-Supreme Court decision tariffs expired on July 24. Within hours, two small businesses sued in the U.S. Court of International Trade, alleging the new tariffs were designed to reinstate the unconstitutional tariff system.
• Trump imposes new tariffs on 60 countries — Trump imposed new tariffs of 10 to 12.5 percent on 60 countries, citing forced labor as the pretext. The bulletin does not specify which countries were targeted, the effective date of the tariffs, or the administration's justification for the specific rates.

Supporting reports

• US House passes war powers resolution directing Trump to end Iran conflict — The US House of Representatives passed a war powers resolution (214-208 vote) directing President Trump to withdraw military forces from the conflict with Iran. The resolution, proposed by Democrat Pramila Jayapal, passed with support from all Democrats and four Republicans (Tom Barrett, Warren Davidson, Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick). This follows an identical resolution passed in June that was also approved by the Senate. The Trump administration has argued war powers resolutions are unconstitutional and has not complied with the prior Senate-approved resolution.
• House passes concurrent resolution to end Iran War — The House of Representatives passed a concurrent resolution to end the war in Iran by a vote of 214 to 208. Four Republicans—Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Warren Davidson of Ohio, and Tom Barrett of Michigan—joined Democrats in support. A concurrent resolution expresses the sentiments of Congress but is not a law and does not require presidential signature. House members used the concurrent resolution mechanism because such resolutions are "privileged" and can bypass standard scheduling requirements.

Supporting reports

• Secretary Hegseth provides inconsistent testimony on Iran war objectives — During Senate Appropriations Committee testimony, Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) questioned Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth about statements made early in the Iran conflict claiming core objectives were to "destroy the missile threat" and "obliterate Iran's missiles and drones." Hegseth had declared four months earlier that all objectives had been achieved. When pressed, Hegseth declined to confirm whether the missile threat had been defeated, instead redefining "combat ineffective" to mean Iran could not deploy missiles at scale against the United States. Ossoff noted that Hegseth had assured the American people of Iranian surrender on day nine of the war and asked whether his statement that Iran's military had been "destroyed and made combat ineffective" was truthful.
• Senator Murray challenged Hegseth's claim that Iran's missile program is "functionally destroyed." — Senator Patty Murray cited Hegseth's April 8 statement that Iran's missile program was "functionally destroyed" with "launchers, production facilities and existing stockpiles depleted and decimated." She noted that Iran has been firing missiles at U.S. military bases and ships for the past week, contradicting Hegseth's assessment. Hegseth responded only that "Iran is at the weakest point militarily it has ever been in in the past decade."
• Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chair Caine testified on $1.5 trillion DOD budget request. — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chair Dan Caine testified before the Senate to defend a $1.5 trillion DOD budget request—nearly double the 2024 budget of $841 billion. Hegseth stated "not funding this department at $1.5 trillion is the greatest threat our nation faces," while Caine acknowledged air power has limits in achieving military objectives.
• Senator Durbin questioned unobligated DOD funding and "woke priorities" pivot. — Senator Dick Durbin asked Hegseth about $75 billion in unobligated DOD funding from the prior year's reconciliation package. Hegseth acknowledged the figure and stated "There's plans and designs on that - move away from all the woke priorities of what the Biden admin was pursuing," indicating funds would be redirected away from diversity and inclusion initiatives.
• Senator Merkley pressed Caine on civilian infrastructure targeting in retaliation. — Senator Jeff Merkley questioned Joint Chiefs Chair Dan Caine on whether the U.S. would target civilian infrastructure in retaliatory strikes, noting that international law prohibits such targeting. Caine responded only that "we have a robust process," declining to provide explicit assurance that civilian infrastructure would be protected.
• Senator Murray questioned necessity of National Guard funding and Caribbean strikes for Iran war. — Senator Patty Murray asked Hegseth why "billions of dollars more for the National Guard and this administration's illegal strikes in the Caribbean" are urgently needed for the Iran war. Hegseth responded by blaming "gross negligence and neglect of the Biden admin" without addressing the substance of her question about the connection between Caribbean operations and Iran conflict.
• Senator Reed challenged Hegseth on war authorization and Strait of Hormuz contingencies. — Senator Jack Reed accused Hegseth of "gross negligence" for failing to fully inform Trump that the Strait of Hormuz could be effectively closed by Iranian action. Reed questioned whether Trump should be "praised for starting war without authority" and creating conditions where "the world economy is suffering tremendously," challenging the administration's failure to obtain congressional authorization.
• Senator Reed questioned whether airstrikes alone will defeat Iran; Caine declined to address ground troop escalation. — Senator Jack Reed asked Joint Chiefs Chair Dan Caine whether airstrikes alone would defeat Iran. Caine acknowledged that "air power has got limits" but declined to address whether ground combat escalation would follow, stating "I think it'd be unhelpful for me to opine on hypotheticals."

Supporting reports

• DOJ Submits First-Ever Application to 'Zombie' Alien Terrorist Removal Court — Trump's Justice Department filed an application to the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, a decades-old tribunal established in 1996 but never previously used, seeking to expedite deportations of noncitizens deemed "alien terrorists." The court's procedures permit use of secret evidence that targets never see, raising constitutional concerns among legal scholars. The Secretary of State can unilaterally label someone an "alien terrorist" based on intent to engage in activities that "could endanger" U.S. welfare or security.

Supporting reports

• Two US advocacy groups sue Trump administration over ICC investigation restrictions — Two US advocacy groups filed suit against the Trump administration, arguing that Trump's 2025 executive order forced them to halt constitutionally protected work with the ICC's investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes in the West Bank and Gaza. The lawsuit challenges the executive order's restrictions on cooperation with the international court.
• US advocacy groups sue Trump administration over ICC sanctions as First Amendment violation — Two US advocacy groups—Democracy in the Arab World Now (Dawn) and Taxpayer Alliance Against Genocide—filed a federal lawsuit in Manhattan alleging that the Trump administration's 2025 sanctions targeting Palestinian rights organizations, ICC officials, and a UN expert violate the First Amendment. The plaintiffs argue the sanctions have created a "profound" chilling effect on protected speech and association, forcing Americans to sever professional relationships and abandon constitutionally protected work on ICC submissions and human rights advocacy. The suit challenges the sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and names Trump, Secretary of State Rubio, Treasury Secretary Bessent, Acting Attorney General Blanche, and OFAC Director Smith as defendants.

Supporting reports

• Khalil v. The Heritage Foundation et al., complaint filed (S.D.N.Y. 1:26-cv-05929) — Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student detained by ICE for 104 days, filed a federal complaint alleging a conspiracy by the Heritage Foundation, its leaders, and Trump administration officials (including Stephen Miller and Marco Rubio) to identify and deport non-citizen pro-Palestinian activists under a coordinated plan called Project Esther. Khalil invokes the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)) to challenge interference with his rights to free speech, equal protection, and freedom from punitive detention, and alleges an unconstitutional Bill of Attainder. He seeks compensatory and punitive damages, declaratory judgment, and an injunction against continued detention or removal on pretextual grounds.
• Mahmoud Khalil Sues Trump Administration Under KKK Act of 1871 — Mahmoud Khalil, detained by ICE for over 100 days last year and currently challenging a deportation order, sued the Trump administration and pro-Israel groups including Canary Mission, Betar, and the Heritage Foundation under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871. The lawsuit alleges that the Trump administration conspired with these organizations to "terrorize and make an example of" Khalil to "intimidate and silence the growing movement for Palestinian rights and political freedom."
• Mahmoud Khalil files civil conspiracy lawsuit against Trump officials and pro-Israel groups — Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian-born Palestinian rights advocate and permanent US resident, filed a lawsuit in Manhattan federal court against Trump administration officials (Stephen Miller, Marco Rubio, Kristi Noem) and pro-Israel groups (Heritage Foundation, Canary Mission, Betar US), alleging a coordinated conspiracy to target and silence pro-Palestine speech. The suit, brought under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, claims the defendants worked as a "public-private partnership" to identify, arrest, and deport pro-Palestinian activists. Khalil was detained for 104 days in 2025 after his arrest by ICE over his advocacy.

Supporting reports

• US District Judge Kathleen Williams voided DOJ's $1.776 billion settlement with Trump — US District Judge Kathleen Williams voided the Department of Justice's $1.776 billion settlement with Trump, finding the litigation constitutionally defective under Article III because Trump, as head of the Executive Branch, controlled both the plaintiff and defendant agencies (Treasury and IRS), making them never genuinely adverse. The judge found no actual case or controversy occurred, no meaningful litigation preceded the settlement, and government lawyers never filed a response or defended the agencies. Williams imposed Rule 11 sanctions and referred one of Trump's attorneys for possible professional discipline.
• Federal Judge Voids Trump's $1.8 Billion IRS Settlement — A federal judge voided Trump's $1.8 billion settlement with the IRS that included an "anti-weaponization fund" and immunity from tax audits, ruling that the president's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS was filed "to manipulate the judicial process." The judge sanctioned two of Trump's personal attorneys, banning one from practicing in the Southern District of Florida for at least one year, and suggested that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and associate Attorney General Stan Woodward could face state bar investigations.
• Federal judge nullifies Trump tax-return settlement and sanctions president's lawyers — US District Judge Kathleen Williams in the Southern District of Florida voided a settlement agreement between the Trump administration and the president over a $10 billion lawsuit regarding leaked tax returns. The judge found the lawsuit was filed in bad faith and the settlement was collusive, designed to confer immunity on Trump and his family and create an $1.8 billion slush fund. Williams sanctioned Trump's lawyers, referred two to bar disciplinary proceedings, and blocked one from practicing in the district for one year.
• Federal judge ruled Trump's IRS lawsuit settlement was improper and manufactured — U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams for the Southern District of Florida ruled that Trump, his lawyers, and Department of Justice lawyers had manufactured a fraudulent settlement of Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service. Williams found the lawsuit was brought "for an improper purpose—to gain the imprimatur of judicial legitimacy for a 'settlement' that had no viable basis in law or fact." The settlement was designed to establish a $1.776 billion slush fund for Trump loyalists and to grant Trump, his family, businesses, and associates immunity from prosecution for any tax crimes revealed by audits of tax returns filed before May 19, 2026.
• Federal judge rules against Trump's IRS lawsuit — On July 13, 2026, U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Williams ruled that Trump and his legal team improperly manufactured a settlement in his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, which aimed to create a slush fund for Trump loyalists and grant immunity from prosecution for tax crimes. The judge found the lawsuit lacked a legitimate basis and recommended sanctions against some lawyers involved.
• Judge Williams recommended sanctions against lawyers involved in fraudulent settlement — Judge Kathleen Williams recommended legal sanctions against some of the lawyers involved in the fraudulent IRS settlement and expressed that she was "extremely troubled" by the testimony of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, which she characterized as "at best, misleading and, at worst, disingenuous."
• E. Jean Carroll Receives Payment from Trump — E. Jean Carroll has received a $5.6 million payment from Donald Trump, confirmed by a court filing. This payment is part of a legal settlement related to a defamation case brought by Carroll against Trump.

Supporting reports

• US military fires attack drones on Iranian naval base at Bandar Abbas — The US military conducted a strike on Iran's Bandar Abbas naval base using one-way attack surface drones on July 12, 2026, according to video released by US Central Command. The strike resulted in explosions at the facility. This action represents an escalation in the exchange of fire between the US and Iran that prompted Senate Democrats to block the NDAA.
• Trump ordered airstrikes on Iran — In response to Iranian attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz, Trump ordered airstrikes against Iran. The strikes followed Iran's closure of the strait and attacks on commercial vessels near the Oman shoreline. Additional U.S. military strikes against Iran were launched on the night of July 12, 2026.
• US and Iranian forces exchanged heavy missile and drone assaults — US and Iranian forces conducted heavy exchanges of missiles and drone attacks over several days. Iran targeted US facilities across the Gulf and declared the Strait of Hormuz closed. Trump declared an end to a ceasefire but left the door open for negotiations. CENTCOM reported US forces struck 140 Iranian military targets on Saturday out of more than 300 during three nights of strikes to degrade Iran's ability to attack civilian mariners. Iran's Revolutionary Guards reported destroying a command center and drone hangars in Jordan, targeting a radar site in Kuwait, and attacking US aircraft carrier support platforms in Oman and a jet maintenance center in Qatar.
• Trump announced blockade of Iranian shipping and claimed U.S. will charge fees for Strait of Hormuz passage — At 10:16 a.m., Trump announced via social media that the U.S. is reinstating a blockade of Iranian ships and customers while keeping the Strait of Hormuz open to all other nations. Trump declared the U.S. will be "the Guardian of the Hormuz Strait" and will charge a 20% fee on all cargo shipped through the waterway to reimburse costs of providing security. This represents a resumption of hostilities against Iran following a June 17 memorandum of understanding that Trump now considers void.
• Trump Declares US Control Over Strait of Hormuz — Former President Donald Trump announced that the United States will take control of the Strait of Hormuz and impose a 20% cargo fee on vessels passing through. This declaration has significant implications for international trade and maritime law, potentially escalating tensions in the region and affecting global oil prices.
• Trump Reverses Strait of Hormuz Fee — President Donald Trump reversed his decision to impose a 20% "reimbursement fee" on the Strait of Hormuz less than a day after announcing it. The fee was intended to be levied on countries using the strategic waterway, but the quick reversal suggests significant backlash or reconsideration of the policy's implications.
• Trump administration announces blockade and cargo fee plan — The Trump administration announced a plan to reinstate a U.S. blockade of the Strait of Hormuz for Iranian ships and impose a 20% fee on all cargo passing through. This announcement, made by Trump on Truth Social, has led to a spike in energy prices. The plan's effectiveness in reopening the strait or reducing energy costs remains unclear. The administration's approach has not resolved the ongoing disruption in maritime traffic, which has been severely affected since the conflict began.
• U.S. offers insurance for tankers in the Strait of Hormuz — The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation announced it would insure losses up to $40 billion for tankers willing to transit the Strait of Hormuz. Despite this offer, most shippers remain unwilling to risk passage due to the ongoing threat from Iran's military tactics. The insurance initiative has not succeeded in restoring normal maritime traffic through the strait, which remains severely disrupted.
• Trump walked back military takeover of Strait of Hormuz, replacing toll fee with investment deals — Trump announced he was reversing his previous day's declaration that the U.S. military would seize the Strait of Hormuz and impose a 20% toll on cargo vessels. He stated he had decided instead to pursue trade and investment deals with Gulf States, claiming these would be "massive" but beneficial to those nations. Trump cited conversations with Middle Eastern leaders as the reason for the reversal, acknowledging the original plan was impractical and faced universal international opposition.
• Trump announced Iran blockade and Strait of Hormuz control — On July 15, Trump announced he was reimposing a blockade on Iran and that the United States would become "THE GUARDIAN OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT." Later the same day, he reversed course, claiming that Gulf allies had told him they would prefer to invest directly in the U.S. rather than pay tolls for strait passage.
• Trump announces blockade on Iran — President Trump announced the reimposition of a blockade on Iran, declaring the U.S. would act as the "guardian of the Hormuz Strait." This announcement follows a reversal of a previous proposal to charge Gulf allies for tolls, indicating a shift in U.S. foreign policy towards Iran.

Supporting reports

• Department of Justice subpoenaed New York Times reporters over Air Force One security reporting — The Department of Justice, through U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Jay Clayton, issued subpoenas to New York Times reporters Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager, and Eric Schmitt. The subpoenas order the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday regarding an alleged violation of federal criminal law related to leaking national security information. The reporters had published a story on Wednesday reporting that the Secret Service had security concerns about the new Air Force One Boeing 747-8 and recommended the president use an older plane during his return from the NATO summit in Türkiye due to escalating Iran tensions. FBI Director Kash Patel conducted an 8-hour investigation from the White House to identify the anonymous sources.
• DOJ subpoenaed New York Times journalists over Air Force One reporting — The Trump administration issued subpoenas on Friday to several journalists at the New York Times after the outlet reported on security concerns involving Trump's new Qatari-donated Air Force One. The subpoenas seek to force the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury in Manhattan on Wednesday. NYT General Counsel David McCraw called the action "an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs." Fox chief national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin posted that the action "should alarm every American."
• New York Times Journalists Subpoenaed Over Trump Air Force One Coverage — The Trump administration subpoenaed several New York Times journalists to testify before a federal grand jury about their reporting on security concerns surrounding Trump's new Air Force One, which was donated by Qatar. The subpoenas followed a White House meeting where FBI Director Kash Patel was directed to lead a leak investigation into the newspaper's reporting. The Times' top newsroom lawyer called the move a violation of press freedom protections in the Constitution.
• DOJ subpoenas New York Times reporters — The Department of Justice issued subpoenas to reporters from the New York Times regarding a story about security concerns related to the new Air Force One plane. The subpoenas require the reporters to testify before a federal grand jury about an alleged violation of federal criminal law concerning the leaking of national security information. U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, nominated by Trump to be the next director of national intelligence, is overseeing the subpoenas. The DOJ stated that the reporters are not targets, but the act of subpoenaing journalists raises concerns about press freedom.
• DOJ issues subpoenas to New York Times journalists — The Trump administration, through the Department of Justice, issued subpoenas to multiple New York Times journalists seeking to compel their testimony before a federal grand jury in Manhattan. The subpoenas followed the Times' reporting on security concerns regarding Trump's new Qatari-gifted aircraft, which cited anonymous sources. An FBI official had previously contacted the Times requesting the article be withheld on national security grounds and demanded disclosure of sources, which the Times refused. The Times' legal counsel condemned the subpoenas as threatening constitutional press freedom.
• DOJ issued subpoenas to New York Times journalists — The Department of Justice issued subpoenas to four New York Times journalists—Julian Barnes, Eric Lipton, and Eric Schmitt—demanding they appear before a grand jury and disclose confidential sources. The subpoenas relate to the Times' reporting on security concerns surrounding the new Air Force One aircraft. The New York Times filed a motion to quash the subpoenas, arguing they were intended to punish the newspaper for its coverage and violated journalists' constitutional rights.

Supporting reports

• Trump formally notified Congress of resumed strikes on Iran — Trump formally notified Congress that the U.S. has resumed strikes on Iran, claiming the Pentagon has another 60 days to conduct strikes before the timeline specified by the War Powers Act expires. This notification follows Trump's earlier claim that hostilities had ended on April 7 with a ceasefire declaration, despite continued military operations and the maintenance of a blockade on Iranian ports.
• Trump notifies Congress of resumed strikes on Iran — On July 13, 2026, President Trump formally notified Congress that the U.S. has resumed military strikes against Iran, claiming that the Pentagon has another 60 days to conduct operations before needing congressional approval under the War Powers Act. This notification follows a pattern of circumventing congressional authority regarding military engagements.

Supporting reports

• Trump posted threats against Iran on social media — At 11:18 PM on Friday, Trump posted on social media that if Iran attempted to assassinate him, "Locked and Loaded" missiles would begin to rain down on the country "to completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran—PRAISE BE TO ALLAH!" The post came after his anger over the Air Force One security reporting had shifted focus to Iran amid escalating tensions during his NATO summit visit to Türkiye.
• Trump posted threats of massive military strikes against Iran — Trump posted on Truth Social that "1000 Missiles are Locked and Loaded and aimed at the Islamic Republic of Iran, with thousands of more to immediately follow" should Iran act on threats to assassinate him. Trump stated orders had been given and the U.S. military was ready to "completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran" for a one-year period subject to extension. The post came after reports that Israel shared intelligence with the US indicating Iran was planning to kill Trump.

Supporting reports

• Trump-appointed judge dismisses seditious conspiracy convictions against Proud Boys leaders — Federal Judge Timothy Kelly, nominated by Trump in his first term, granted the Department of Justice's motion to dismiss seditious conspiracy convictions against Proud Boys leaders Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, and Zachary Rehl, who had been convicted by jury of serious crimes during the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. Kelly acknowledged in his ruling that the dismissal was driven by Trump's desire to excuse the violence of his supporters, not by facts or law, but found himself bound by an appellate court's prior vacation of the convictions.
• Federal judge dismissed Proud Boys seditious conspiracy case — Federal Judge Timothy J. Kelly granted a DOJ request to dismiss a criminal case accusing five members of the Proud Boys of seditious conspiracy in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack. Judge Kelly, appointed by Trump, stated he did not agree with the administration's decision to dismiss the charges but had little choice but to accept it. Kelly wrote that the Capitol attack was "a perilous event" and an assault on "the peaceful transfer of power from one president to the next," contradicting revisionist narratives about the riot.

Supporting reports

• Complaint filed — Doe v. Mullin (E.D. Va.) — J. Doe, a noncitizen subject to a 2017 removal order, filed a complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia challenging a Department of Homeland Security civil penalty of $1,820,352 imposed under an Interim Final Rule issued June 27, 2025. The rule, promulgated by ICE and the Executive Office for Immigration Review, expedited civil penalties against noncitizens alleged to be unlawfully present. Doe alleges the penalty is functionally unpayable, designed to coerce self-deportation, and violates the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause, the Fifth Amendment's due process guarantees, and the Administrative Procedure Act. Doe seeks vacatur of the penalty notice, injunctive relief barring collection, and declarations that the rule is unconstitutional.

Supporting reports

• Pentagon and DOJ establish joint taskforce to identify and prosecute press leaks — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the creation of a joint Pentagon-DOJ taskforce to identify and prosecute unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information to the press. Hegseth delegated tasking authority to the Pentagon's Office of General Counsel to request records and support across the department for media leak investigations. The announcement follows the Trump administration's issuance of subpoenas to New York Times journalists who reported on security concerns regarding Trump's new Qatari-gifted aircraft. The taskforce represents an escalation in the administration's crackdown on leaks and press freedom.

Supporting reports

• Trump demands Supreme Court rehear birthright citizenship case — One week after the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionally protected right of birthright citizenship, President Trump announced on July 8, 2026, that he would "IMMEDIATELY" ask the Supreme Court to rehear the case, calling the ruling "wrong" and an "absolutely insane decision." The last Supreme Court rehearing occurred more than 50 years ago and requires a majority of the court to approve. Trump's demand to relitigate a recently decided constitutional question signals intent to overturn established citizenship protections.
• Trump requests Supreme Court rehearing on birthright citizenship ruling — President Trump announced he would petition the US Supreme Court to reconsider its recent ruling upholding birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment. Trump cited as evidence a Texas hospital's marketing of maternity services to expectant mothers in Mexico, claiming widespread "birth tourism" promotion. The Supreme Court had rejected Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship last month. Trump's request comes after a Fox News report on two billboards placed by Mission Regional Medical Center in Texas and Mexico advertising delivery packages starting at $4,000.

Supporting reports

• Trump made incoherent statements confusing Iran with Japan and Zelensky with Putin — At the NATO summit, President Trump referred to Iran as the "Islamic Republic of Japan" and referred to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as "President Putin." These statements were noted by multiple observers as evidence of incoherence and confusion during a period of active military conflict and diplomatic crisis.
• Trump falsely claims eight wars ended — At the NATO summit in Turkey, Trump claimed he should have won the Nobel Peace Prize, stating he had "settled 8" wars. Fact-checker Daniel Dale examined the list and found it included: a diplomatic dispute between Egypt and Ethiopia that was never a war; a mystery situation between Serbia and Kosovo that was not a war under Trump; the ongoing eastern Congo conflict that has not actually ended; the 12-day 2025 Israel-Iran war followed by renewed U.S.-Iran conflict in 2026; the Israel-Hamas war with continued Israeli attacks despite a ceasefire; an India-Pakistan ceasefire that India claims Trump had no role in; and the Armenia-Azerbaijan and Thailand-Cambodia agreements where parties credited Trump's involvement.
• Trump makes incoherent statement about Iranian missiles — During his final appearance at the NATO summit, Trump stated: "We had 11 missiles shot by the Islamic Republic of Japan." The statement appears to conflate Iran with Japan and contains no factual basis.
• Trump threatened war crimes and genocidal rhetoric against Iran at NATO summit in Ankara — At a NATO leaders summit in Ankara on July 8, 2026, President Trump threatened to destroy Iran's infrastructure, including bridges, electrical grids, and desalination plants that supply drinking water to millions. Trump also referred to the Iranian people as "a cancer that needs to be eradicated in its early stages." The article characterizes these statements as genocidal rhetoric delivered by the U.S. President at an international military alliance summit. Trump also confused Iran with Japan, called Ukrainian President Zelenskyy "President Putin," and threatened Spain while discussing Greenland's sovereignty.
• Illinois Governor Pritzker publicly stated Trump is suffering from dementia — Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker reposted Trump's reference to the "Islamic Republic of Japan" with a public comment stating: "Donald Trump is suffering from dementia. Someone needs to step in before it's too late." The statement was made in response to Trump's incoherent remarks at the NATO summit.

Supporting reports

• Trump threatened war crimes and genocidal rhetoric against Iran at NATO summit in Ankara — At a NATO leaders summit in Ankara on July 8, 2026, President Trump threatened to destroy Iran's infrastructure, including bridges, electrical grids, and desalination plants that supply drinking water to millions. Trump also referred to the Iranian people as "a cancer that needs to be eradicated in its early stages." The article characterizes these statements as genocidal rhetoric delivered by the U.S. President at an international military alliance summit. Trump also confused Iran with Japan, called Ukrainian President Zelenskyy "President Putin," and threatened Spain while discussing Greenland's sovereignty.

Supporting reports

• 11th Circuit Court of Appeals strikes down higher education component of Florida's Stop Woke Act — A federal appeals panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 on July 7, 2026, that the higher education provision of Florida's Stop Woke Act (Individual Freedom Act) violates the First Amendment by restricting professors' free speech on race and gender topics. The court found the state was "puppeteering" educators by controlling their speech and accused Florida of attempting to ban unpopular ideas from public discourse. The ruling reinforces a November 2022 district court injunction and mirrors a 2024 appeals court decision blocking the law's workplace provision.

Supporting reports

• EEOC rescinds affirmative action guidelines under Title VII — The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a final interpretive rule rescinding its 1979 Guidelines on Affirmative Action Appropriate Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC determined the Guidelines are inconsistent with Title VII's plain text, obsolete given 46+ years of subsequent caselaw, limited to affirmative action benefiting only women and minorities, and potentially conflict with recent Supreme Court precedent and constitutional equal protection guarantees. The rescission removes 29 CFR Part 1608 from the Code of Federal Regulations, effective immediately, eliminating the statutory defense under Section 713(b) for employers relying on the Guidelines in good faith.

Supporting reports

• Trump claimed to have served a third term — During his July 4th speech, Trump stated: "We rebuilt our military in my first term. We use it a little in our -- actually I should say third term, but I won't do that, because I don't want any controversy." Trump referenced serving a "third term" before catching himself.

Supporting reports

• US Supreme Court rules president can fire independent agency heads at will — On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of President Trump in a case brought by former Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, who was fired in March. The court overturned a 90-year-old precedent by holding that the president has the right to remove the head of any federal government agency at will. The decision, justified through the unitary executive theory, grants the president sole total control over the executive branch and opens the door to what critics call an "imperial presidency."