Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• Third Circuit upholds ruling that Alina Habba's appointment as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey was unlawful — A three-judge panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling finding that President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi violated federal vacancy laws and the Senate confirmation process in appointing Alina Habba as acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey. The panel rejected Bondi's argument that she could funnel U.S. attorney powers into a "special attorney" title to circumvent Senate confirmation. Despite the disqualification, Habba and the DOJ continue to claim she holds the position.
• Federal appeals court upheld ruling that Alina Habba's appointment was unlawful — A federal appeals court upheld a lower court ruling that Alina Habba, whom Trump placed in the position of acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey, was appointed unlawfully. Trump appointed her to a 120-day acting appointment, after which district court judges control the spot until Senate confirmation. The judges rejected Habba, who has no prosecutorial experience, and selected experienced prosecutor Desiree Leigh Grace instead. Attorney General Pam Bondi then fired Grace and maneuvered Habba back into control.
• Federal judges found illegal Trump appointments of multiple U.S. attorneys — Federal judges have found illegal Trump's appointments of U.S. attorneys for the Central District of California and the District of Nevada, in addition to the Eastern District of Virginia and District of New Jersey. These rulings indicate a pattern of the administration attempting to place unqualified or illegally appointed prosecutors in positions of power.
• Judge D. Michael Fisher issued opinion on Habba appointment — Federal judges have found illegal Trump's appointments of U.S. attorneys for the Central District of California and the District of Nevada, in addition to the Eastern District of Virginia and District of New Jersey appointments previously ruled unlawful.
• Appeals court upholds disqualification of Trump's interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey — Judge D. Michael Fisher wrote in the appeals court opinion that "It is apparent that the current administration has been frustrated by some of the legal and political barriers to getting its appointees in place," but stated that Trump cannot circumvent the law to place his preferred appointees in prosecutorial positions. The ruling affirmed that district court judges retain authority to select U.S. attorneys when the 120-day acting appointment expires and the Senate has not confirmed a nominee.
• Third Circuit Court affirms Alina Habba unlawfully occupied U.S. Attorney position — A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit unanimously upheld the disqualification of Alina Habba as interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey. The panel, composed of judges appointed by George W. Bush and Barack Obama, found that the Trump administration had attempted to circumvent the Senate confirmation process by appointing Habba as a perpetual "interim" U.S. Attorney after she failed to secure Senate confirmation votes. The court noted that citizens of New Jersey and loyal employees in the U.S. Attorney's Office deserve clarity and stability.
• Federal appeals court ruled Trump's attorney appointment unlawful — The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that Alina Habba was never legally acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey. Judges from across the political spectrum determined she unlawfully occupied the role after attempting to sidestep established rules governing vacancies. The ruling follows a pattern of Trump administration officials attempting to bypass Senate confirmation, destroy institutional norms, and consolidate power through procedural manipulation.
• Judge D. Michael Fisher criticized administration's circumvention of legal barriers — A federal appeals court ruled that Trump's efforts to keep Alina Habba, his former personal attorney, as the top prosecutor in New Jersey were unlawful, upholding a lower court's decision that disqualified Habba from her post. The ruling rejected Trump's attempt to place a personal loyalist in a federal prosecutorial position.
• — A federal appeals court upheld a lower court ruling that President Trump's appointment of Alina Habba as acting U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey was unlawful. Trump appointed her to a 120-day acting position, after which district court judges were to control the spot until Senate confirmation. The judges rejected Habba, who has no prosecutorial experience, and selected experienced prosecutor Desiree Leigh Grace instead. Attorney General Pam Bondi then fired Grace and maneuvered Habba back into control.
• — In the appeals court opinion upholding the ruling against Habba's appointment, Judge D. Michael Fisher wrote: "It is apparent that the current administration has been frustrated by some of the legal and political barriers to getting its appointees in place." The judges stated that Trump cannot simply ignore the law to place his preferred appointees in office.

Supporting reports

• White House claimed September 2 boat strike was lawful self-defense — White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the administration believes the September 2 strike on a boat off Venezuela was lawful because it "was conducted in self defense to protect Americans and vital United States interests." This justification would permit the president or those acting in his name to be judge, jury, and executioner without regard to law. Leavitt attributed the orders to Admiral Bradley rather than Defense Secretary Hegseth.
• Trump administration announced formal armed conflict determination against drug cartels — The Trump administration announced that President Donald Trump has "determined" the United States is in a formal armed conflict with drug cartels and that individuals aboard targeted boats are formally designated "combatants." This determination was made without providing the legal authority required to support such a classification. The administration announced the strikes on September 4 and informed Congress to ensure it was "fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution," but has since ignored that resolution's requirement for congressional approval for hostile actions continuing longer than 60 days, a deadline that passed in early November.
• Trump administration asserts formal armed conflict with drug cartels without legal authority — The Trump administration declared that President Trump has "determined" the U.S. is in a formal armed conflict with drug cartels and that individuals on targeted boats are formally "combatants." The administration notified Congress of strikes on September 4 under the War Powers Resolution, which requires congressional approval for hostile actions continuing longer than 60 days. That deadline passed in early November 2025, yet Trump has not sought or obtained congressional approval and has ignored the War Powers Resolution requirement. Legal experts have stated the operation lacks lawful foundation, as civilians engaged in trade—even illicit trade—are not enemy combatants under international law.

Supporting reports

• Jared Kushner, a private citizen, sat in on critical U.S.-Ukraine negotiations — During a critical meeting between Ukrainian officials and U.S. representatives, Jared Kushner, a private citizen with significant foreign financial entanglements, was present in the room. The text describes his presence as "inappropriate" and "alarming," noting that Ukrainians appeared to be facing individuals pushing a Russian surrender plan with Kushner seated beside them as if he were still a government official.
• Kushner conducted high-level Ukraine peace negotiations with Putin without formal government appointment — Jared Kushner, President Trump's son-in-law, traveled to Moscow on December 2, 2025, and participated in direct negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding a peace deal to end the war in Ukraine. Kushner was accompanied only by Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and an interpreter. According to Popular Information's analysis, Kushner's participation in these negotiations—and similar involvement in Gaza negotiations—likely violates federal law by functioning as an undesignated Special Government Employee without formal appointment, thereby circumventing conflict-of-interest statutes and emoluments restrictions.
• Kushner broke public pledge to avoid foreign policy role in second Trump administration — In a February 2024 interview with Axios, Kushner pledged he would not resume a foreign policy or advisory role in a second Trump administration, stating his commitment was to his private equity firm and investors. When pressed about whether his billions in foreign government investments would make foreign policy work "very difficult," Kushner replied: "I'm an investor now. I served in government, and I think my track record is pretty impeccable. Now I'm a private investor." Despite this explicit public commitment, Kushner has since conducted high-level foreign policy negotiations with Russia and participated in Gaza negotiations on behalf of the Trump administration.
• Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that Steve Witkoff is in Moscow attempting to negotiate with Putin. — During the Cabinet meeting, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated "Even as we sit here right now, Steve Witkoff is in Moscow trying to save lives. The war never would've happened if you had been president." This revealed that a White House official was conducting diplomatic negotiations in Moscow while the Secretary of State remained in Washington attending the Cabinet meeting.
• Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner photographed in Moscow — Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner (the latter not a government official) were photographed walking the streets of Moscow while a cabinet meeting was occurring in Washington. The timing coincided with Vladimir Putin issuing a statement blaming Europe for hindering Trump's foreign policy and stating Russia is ready for war.

Supporting reports

• Former JAGs declare alleged orders constitute war crimes — The Former JAGs Working Group, composed of former military judge advocate generals, issued a statement unanimously declaring that the giving and execution of the alleged orders to kill survivors "constitute war crimes, murder, or both" and called for prosecution of anyone who issues or follows such orders. The group noted that the military's legal guardrails, which Hegseth had systematically dismantled after purging JAGs from the Army and Air Force in February 2025, would have prevented these alleged crimes had they remained in place.
• Hegseth defended strikes as legal and justified on social media — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth posted on X that the strikes are "specifically intended to be 'lethal, kinetic strikes'" designed to stop lethal drugs, destroy narco-boats, and kill narco-terrorists. He stated "We have only just begun to kill narco-terrorists" but did not directly deny the allegation that he ordered killing of crew members in the water.
• Pete Hegseth allegedly ordered killing of crew members on suspected drug-smuggling vessel — The Washington Post reported that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth gave a spoken order to kill all crew members aboard a vessel suspected of smuggling drugs in the Caribbean Sea. The report triggered bipartisan congressional scrutiny, with Senate Armed Services Committee leaders Roger Wicker and Jack Reed and House Armed Services Committee leaders Mike Rogers and Adam Smith announcing investigations into the alleged strikes.
• White House claimed September 2 boat strike was lawful self-defense — White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the administration believes the September 2 strike on a boat off Venezuela was lawful because it "was conducted in self defense to protect Americans and vital United States interests." This justification would permit the president or those acting in his name to be judge, jury, and executioner without regard to law. Leavitt attributed the orders to Admiral Bradley rather than Defense Secretary Hegseth.
• Senator Angus King stated boat strike would be war crime if facts alleged are true — Senator Angus King, a lawyer who sits on both the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Senate Armed Services Committee, told CNN that if the facts alleged about the September 2 boat strike are accurate—specifically that there was a second strike to kill survivors in the water—"that's a stone cold war crime. It's also murder." King stated that Congress would investigate who gave which orders and when.
• Senator Angus King stated September 2 strike was war crime if facts alleged — Senator Angus King (I-ME), a lawyer on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Armed Services Committee, told CNN that if the facts alleged are true—that a second strike was specifically conducted to kill survivors in the water—"that's a stone cold war crime. It's also murder." King stated the law is clear and Congress will investigate who gave which orders and when.
• Defense Secretary Hegseth posted mocking AI image about boat strike — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted an AI-generated fake cover of a children's book featuring Franklin the Turtle in military gear firing a rocket launcher at a burning boat with survivors, titled "Franklin Targets Narco Terrorists" with the caption "For your Christmas wish list…" The post appeared to mock concerns about a September 2 strike on survivors of a boat attack off Venezuela that has been characterized as a potential war crime.
• Defense Secretary Hegseth posted support for Admiral Bradley — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted that "Admiral Mitch Bradley is an American hero, a true professional, and has my 100% support. I stand by him and the combat decisions he has made—on the September 2 mission and all others since." The post appeared to shift responsibility for the September 2 boat strike to the admiral while maintaining public support, a tactic commentators characterized as "underbussing."
• U.S. military strike on Venezuelan fishing boat alleged as war crime — A U.S. military strike on a Venezuelan fishing boat is characterized as potentially constituting a war crime. Reports indicate a second strike may have been ordered after survivors were observed clinging to life. MAGA Congressman Carlos Gimenez dismissed calls for investigation, insisting that Pete Hegseth and Trump's denial of wrongdoing should be accepted without further inquiry.
• White House Press Secretary contradicts Trump on deadly second strike in military operation — White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt held a press conference addressing a controversial second military strike that killed survivors of an initial boat strike. Leavitt admitted the second strike occurred but claimed neither Trump nor Defense Secretary Hegseth ordered it, attributing the decision to Admiral Bradley. She characterized the strike as lawful self-defense. Trump had denied knowledge of the incident the previous night on Air Force One. The contradiction raised questions about command responsibility and adherence to international law and the Geneva Convention.
• Hegseth ordered lethal September 2 Caribbean boat strike — The New York Times reported that five US officials confirmed that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the lethal September 2 attack on a vessel in the Caribbean, though officials also claimed that Special Operations commander Admiral Frank Bradley directed the initial missile strike, followed by additional strikes that killed survivors and sank the boat. The narrative matched White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt's briefing statement.
• Pentagon and Congressional officials expressed concern about scapegoating of Admiral Mitch Bradley. — Officials in Congress and the Pentagon stated they are increasingly concerned that the Trump administration intends to scapegoat Admiral Mitch Bradley, the military officer who directed U.S. forces to kill two survivors of a targeted strike on suspected drug smugglers in Latin America. Lawmakers made initial moves to investigate whether the attack constituted a war crime. Pentagon officials described feeling angry at uncertainty over whether Hegseth would take responsibility for his alleged role or leave military and civilian staff to face consequences.
• Rep. Carlos Gimenez changed position on legality of killing survivors. — After initially stating that the story about a second strike killing survivors must be fake news because Hegseth would never do such a thing, Rep. Carlos Gimenez appeared on CNN and changed his position. When asked "If there were survivors clinging for their lives on that boat, was it legal to go ahead and kill them?" Gimenez responded "If the mission was just to have a second strike to kill the survivors, that's questionable."
• Sen. Markwayne Mullin defended the second strike as necessary. — Senator Markwayne Mullin appeared on Fox News and stated "If there was a second strike, it wouldn't be to just simply take out the survivors. It's because there was still a threat or opportunity for them to run." This represents a Republican senator's defense of the lethal strike on survivors.
• Senate Majority Leader John Thune declined to evaluate Hegseth's leadership. — Senate Majority Leader John Thune, when asked about Hegseth's leadership at the Department of Defense, stated "I don't have, at this point, I guess, an evaluation of the secretary. Others can make those evaluations." This represents a refusal to comment on the Defense Secretary's fitness for office during an ongoing investigation into potential war crimes.
• Inspector General report finds Hegseth sent classified information over Signal — Acting Inspector General Steven A. Stebbins released a report on December 2 concluding that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sent sensitive, nonpublic, operational information over the non-secure messaging app Signal on his personal cell phone, violating Department of Defense policy. The report detailed that U.S. Central Command sent Hegseth seven emails classified as SECRET/NOFORN before and during strikes on Houthi militants in Yemen on March 14 and 15. Hegseth transmitted information including details about targets, weapons packages, aircraft, and strike times to people on a Signal chat. The report noted that if the information had fallen into adversaries' hands, Houthi forces might have been able to counter U.S. forces or reposition to avoid strikes, creating a risk to operational security and potential harm to U.S. pilots.
• Coast Guard records revealed that 21% of boats interdicted prior to new Trump policy contained no drugs. — Senator Rand Paul requested records from the Coast Guard on boat interdictions for the 12-month period before the Trump/Hegseth policy of striking suspected drug-smuggling vessels went into effect. The Coast Guard responded with data showing that of 212 total vessels interdicted in the year prior to the new policy who were suspected of trafficking drugs, only 55 actually had drugs on board. Additionally, 21% of boats stopped off the coast of Venezuela possessed no drugs at all, indicating a significant false-positive rate in targeting decisions.
• Trump administration lawyers warned of criminal behavior in boat strike — Zeteo reported that Trump administration lawyers have been warning senior colleagues that if the Washington Post's reporting on the second strike is true, it would be blatantly illegal, with one administration official saying, "There's defending the homeland, and then there's criminal behavior."
• CNN National Security Correspondent Barbara Starr responded to Pete Hegseth's criticism of the press. — CNN National Security Correspondent Barbara Starr responded to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's statement that reporters "sit in your air conditioned offices" and plant "fake stories." Starr stated "How dare you sir. Close to every member of the press corps you despise has made multiple reporting trips to combat zones, been under fire, some reporters wounded, some killed. Some today still with PTS. Mr. Hegseth should we indeed finally accept it's just not possible for you to show any basic respect?" This represents a direct rebuke of the Defense Secretary's attack on the press.
• George Will published opinion piece titled "A Sickening Moral Slum of an Administration." — Conservative columnist George Will published an opinion piece in the Washington Post with the title "A Sickening Moral Slum of an Administration." In the piece, Will wrote "Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth seems to be a war criminal. Without a war. An interesting achievement." This represents significant criticism from a prominent conservative voice.
• Pete Hegseth posted unauthorized mock children's book cover depicting Franklin the Turtle as a military combatant. — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted on social media a mock cover of the children's book series "Franklin the Turtle" titled "Franklin Targets Narco Terrorists," showing the character dressed in military gear, standing in a helicopter, and firing a weapon at boats. Hegseth captioned the image "For your Christmas wish list." The publisher, Kids Can Press, issued a statement condemning the unauthorized use, stating that Franklin the Turtle "stands for kindness, empathy, and inclusivity" and that the depiction "directly contradicts these values."
• White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt stated that Hegseth had authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct the strikes. — White House Spokesperson Karoline Leavitt made scripted remarks at a news briefing acknowledging that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had authorized Admiral Mitch Bradley to conduct the strikes. She stated that Bradley "worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed." The remarks triggered backlash within the Department of Defense, with officials expressing anger at the uncertainty over whether Hegseth would take responsibility for his role or leave military and civilian staff to face consequences.
• White House Press Secretary defended legality of second strike without substantiation — On Monday following the Washington Post report, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the second strike during the September 2 operation, stating that everything was within the military's legal authority. Leavitt provided no details, evidence, or legal reasoning to substantiate the claim that killing survivors clinging to wreckage complies with law.
• Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth denied knowledge of a second military strike that killed survivors of a targeted operation. — During the Cabinet meeting, Hegseth stated that he did not know about a second strike that killed survivors in the water following an initial strike on a suspected drug-smuggling boat. He claimed he relied on military commanders for information and had not been involved in the second strike, while simultaneously defending the decision as correct and stating "we have his back" regarding the commander who authorized it. He also attacked the press, claiming reporters sit in "air conditioned offices" and plant "fake stories."
• Pete Hegseth posted statement of support for Admiral Mitch Bradley regarding combat decisions in the September 2 strike. — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted on X that Admiral Mitch Bradley is "an American hero, a true professional" and stated "I stand by him and the combat decisions he has made - on the Sept 2 mission and all others since." The post came amid reporting that Pentagon officials and Congress were investigating whether the strike that killed survivors constituted a war crime and that military officials believed Hegseth was attempting to scapegoat Bradley.
• Hegseth distanced himself from second boat strike — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth continued to distance himself from the second strike carried out on a boat in the Caribbean to kill two survivors in September, saying he watched the first strike he authorized live but "a couple of hours passed" before he was informed of the follow-up strike. Hegseth claimed he "did not personally see survivors" because the vessel was "on fire and was exploded," and attributed the action to "the fog of war."
• Classified Inspector General report shows Pete Hegseth shared sensitive war plans over Signal app — A classified Inspector General report set for public release on Thursday documents that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth risked endangering troops' lives by sharing sensitive war plans over the Signal messaging app, a security breach that violated protocols for handling classified information.
• Hegseth claims declassification authority and denies wrongdoing — On Wednesday, December 3, the day after the inspector general report was released, Defense Secretary Hegseth claimed he had declassified the information he shared and therefore had not acted inappropriately. He stated on social media that the report had cleared him, writing "No classified information. Total exoneration." Hegseth asserted that he determined the material he shared did not need to be classified because "there were no details that would endanger our troops or the mission." However, the inspector general's report acknowledged that while Hegseth had the authority to declassify information, his actions created a risk to operational security that could have resulted in failed mission objectives and harm to U.S. pilots.
• Secretary Hegseth claimed total exoneration in IG report response — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth responded to the Pentagon Inspector General's report by claiming "total exoneration" and stating "case closed," asserting that no classified information was shared. His spokesperson Sean Parnell echoed the claim of total exoneration. However, Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) contradicted this characterization on CNN, stating that "no one can rationalize that as an exoneration."
• Congressional briefing on boat strike held in closed session — On December 4, Admiral Frank Bradley and Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine appeared before House and Senate armed services and intelligence committees in a closed briefing to discuss the September 2 boat strike. Bradley denied receiving a "kill them all" order from Defense Secretary Hegseth, though lawmakers disagreed sharply on what the video showed. Democratic lawmakers expressed deep concern about potential war crimes; Republican lawmakers defended the strikes as justified.
• Representative Himes characterized boat strike video as deeply troubling — Representative Jim Himes (D-CT), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, described a video of the U.S. strike against two survivors of the September 2 boat strike as "one of the most troubling things I've seen in my time in public service." Himes stated the video showed "two individuals in clear distress without any means of locomotion, with a destroyed vessel,... killed by the United States."
• Admiral Bradley briefed Congress on September 2 boat strike — Admiral Frank Bradley, who oversaw the September 2 missile strike on a boat that killed 11 people, met with lawmakers on Thursday to discuss the operation. He is expected to tell them that he considered the survivors viable targets rather than shipwrecked, defenseless mariners. Bradley is expected to testify that U.S. personnel observing the operation believed the survivors possessed communications equipment and may have been capable of calling other drug smugglers for help recovering cargo, though it is unclear if they made contact with anyone.
• Rep. Adam Smith questioned legality of strikes on survivors — Representative Adam Smith, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, characterized the decision to strike two survivors on an incapacitated vessel as "highly questionable." Smith stated that the military's assumption that the survivors were still "in the fight" was based on an "unbelievably broad definition" of what constitutes active combat, given that the vessel was destroyed and the survivors had no means of locomotion.
• Rep. Jim Himes called briefing one of most troubling experiences — Representative Jim Himes, House Intelligence Committee ranking Democrat, stated that the briefing on the boat strikes was "one of the most troubling things I've seen in my time in public service." Himes characterized the killing of two individuals in clear distress, without means of locomotion and with a destroyed vessel, as deeply problematic.
• Rep. Mike Turner expressed concerns about accuracy of military intelligence — Representative Mike Turner (R-OH), who was chair of the House Intelligence Committee until Trump ordered Speaker Mike Johnson to remove him, expressed concerns about whether the accuracy of information being used in military operations meets the standard for informed congressional oversight. Turner stated that members have "very much concerns" about the level of accuracy and noted that if the individuals targeted were captured, tried, and convicted, they would not be subject to capital punishment, yet they are being killed without due process.
• Senator Tom Cotton endorsed boat strikes as lawful — Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Tom Cotton, emerging from the briefing on the September 2 boat strikes, characterized all four strikes that day as "righteous," "entirely lawful and needful," and exactly what military commanders should do. Cotton stated he saw two survivors trying to flip a boat loaded with drugs back over to stay in the fight.
• Inspector General report finds Hegseth violated Pentagon policies on classified information handling — The Department of Defense inspector general released a report concluding that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth violated Pentagon policies by using the Signal messaging app to share classified details about upcoming airstrikes in Yemen, including aircraft types and strike times, two to four hours before missions on 15 March. The report determined his actions created operational security risks that could have resulted in failed missions and harm to pilots. Hegseth also failed to retain associated messages, violating federal record-keeping requirements.
• Messages from Hegseth's Signal account contained specific strike timing details — CNN reported that messages sent from Secretary Hegseth's Signal account to a group chat offered specific, real-time updates about planned military strikes, including one message that read "This is DEFINITELY when the first bombs will drop." The messages were so specific that they identified exact timing of operations. It remains unclear whether Hegseth properly declassified the information before sharing it with other top Trump officials and a reporter from The Atlantic who was accidentally added to the chat.
• Pentagon may not turn over Strike Bridge communications logs to Congress — The New York Times reported that military officials had used a written texting system known as "Strike Bridge" to communicate during planning and execution of military operations, including communications between Admiral Bradley and SEAL Team 6 operators directing drone strikes. The system automatically saves messages. Several congressional officials stated that lawmakers had requested to review logs related to the operation, along with written documentation including Hegseth's "execute order" and rules of engagement. It remains unclear whether the Pentagon will turn over these records to Congress.
• Senator Jack Reed demanded complete release of strike footage — Senator Jack Reed, ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, stated that the Department of Defense has no choice but to release the complete, unedited footage of the strike, given that the President has agreed to do so. Reed stated that the briefing confirmed his "worst fears" about the nature of the Trump administration's military activities and demonstrated why the Senate Armed Services Committee has repeatedly requested and been denied fundamental information, documents, and facts about the operation.
• Senator Rand Paul called for public release of strike video — Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) stated that the video of distressed, shipwrecked, or incapacitated people on boats being bombed should be shown to every American, calling for public disclosure of the controversial military operation.
• Trump agreed to release video of second strike — When asked whether he would release video of the second strike to the public, President Trump stated: "Whatever they have, we'd certainly release. No problem." This represents a commitment to public disclosure of the controversial military operation.
• Admiral Bradley briefed Congress on September 2 boat strike in Caribbean — Admiral Frank "Mitch" Bradley, Special Operations commander, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine conducted a closed-door briefing for congressional members regarding a U.S. military strike on September 2 against a small boat in the Caribbean. The strike killed nine of eleven people aboard; a second strike 41 minutes later killed the two survivors. Bradley stated the vessel appeared to be afloat due to cocaine packages and survivors could have floated to safety to continue drug trafficking, contradicting earlier claims that survivors were communicating with other vessels. The administration claims the operation targets drug cartels under a formal armed conflict determination, but has not provided legal authority and has ignored War Powers Resolution requirements for congressional approval beyond 60 days.
• Defense Secretary Hegseth responded to social media post about boat strikes — Andrew Kolvet of Turning Point USA posted on social media: "Every new attack aimed at Pete Hegseth makes me want another narco drug boat blown up and sent to the bottom of the ocean." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth quoted Kolvet's post and responded: "Your wish is our command, Andrew. Just sunk another narco boat." U.S. Southern Command confirmed a strike against a small boat in the eastern Pacific, stating that intelligence confirmed the vessel was carrying illicit narcotics and four male individuals aboard were killed.
• U.S. military conducted more than 20 strikes on small boats with at least 87 deaths — As of the date of the article, the U.S. military had carried out more than 20 strikes on small boats that the Trump administration claims are run by "narco-terrorists," resulting in at least 87 deaths. These operations began in September 2025 following the initial September 2 strike and have continued without formal congressional authorization beyond the initial War Powers Resolution notification.
• CNN reports boat was not headed for U.S., contradicting administration claim — CNN reported that the boat struck on September 2 was not headed for the United States, contradicting a claim made by President Trump. Admiral Frank "Mitch" Bradley, overseeing Special Operations that day, told Congress the intelligence indicated the boat was headed to meet a larger vessel bound for Suriname to transfer drugs. Bradley confirmed the military could not locate the second vessel. U.S. drug enforcement officials stated that drugs trafficked through Suriname are generally bound for Europe. Bradley also confirmed that after the people on the boat appeared to see American aircraft, they turned the boat back toward land.
• New York Times reports survivors of first strike were waving before second strike — Journalists Julian E. Barnes and Charlie Savage reported that survivors of the first strike on the boat were waving to something overhead before a second strike killed them. The report notes that the administration had not announced its new policy of striking alleged drug traffickers rather than arresting them, so the men had no way of knowing they were under attack. Some observers believed the men were waving to be rescued; others supporting the administration's position speculated they were signaling other alleged traffickers, though no other vessels or aircraft were in visual range.
• Pentagon announced 22nd airstrike against suspected drug smuggling vessel in eastern Pacific — The Pentagon announced a lethal strike on a boat suspected of carrying illegal narcotics in the eastern Pacific Ocean on 4 December, killing four men. The US Southern Command described the strike as a "lethal kinetic strike on a vessel in international waters operated by a Designated Terrorist Organization" and stated that intelligence confirmed the vessel was carrying illicit narcotics. This was the 22nd attack in the campaign against boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, bringing the death toll to at least 87 people. The strike was the first publicly announced operation in nearly three weeks.
• Pentagon announces lethal strike on boat in eastern Pacific, killing four men — The US military, at the direction of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel in international waters in the eastern Pacific Ocean, killing four men described as narco-terrorists. The strike, the 22nd such operation since September, was conducted by Joint Task Force Southern Spear and targeted a boat suspected of carrying illegal narcotics. The operation brings the death toll of the campaign to at least 87 people. The strike occurs amid mounting congressional scrutiny over the legal basis for the attacks.
• TPUSA operations head Kolvet called for drug boat destruction; Hegseth confirmed action — Andrew Kolvet, now running operations at The America First PAC (TPUSA) after Charlie Kirk's death, posted on social media: "Every new attack aimed at Pete Hegseth makes me want another narco drug boat blown up and sent to the bottom of the ocean." Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth responded: "Your wish is our command, Andrew. Just sunk another narco boat," and posted a video of what he described as a homicide committed by the Department of Defense.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration overturns church sanctuary policy for immigration enforcement — The Trump administration reversed previous policy that prohibited immigration enforcement arrests in churches, allowing ICE to conduct arrests in religious sanctuaries. This policy reversal eliminates a longstanding protection for immigrants seeking refuge in faith communities and undermines the traditional sanctuary role of churches.

Supporting reports

• Faith leaders pepper-sprayed and arrested during ICE facility protests — Faith leaders, including Rev. David Black of First Presbyterian Church of Chicago, were subjected to violent police response while conducting peaceful protests and prayer vigils outside the Broadview ICE processing facility. Black was shot in the head with pepper balls while praying; other clergy members were arrested during non-violent resistance actions attempting to block ICE vans.

Supporting reports

• ICE arrests and violent enforcement actions in Chicago — Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials have arrested approximately 800 people as of October 1, 2025, in Chicago using violent tactics including body-slamming and deploying teargas in residential areas. Faith leaders have organized resistance through Friday gatherings at the Broadview processing facility, attempted non-violent blockades of ICE vans, and filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for preventing clergy access to detained immigrants and violating First Amendment rights. The Trump administration has also overturned previous policy to permit ICE arrests in churches.

Supporting reports

• Trump claimed authority to nullify Biden's autopen-signed executive orders — On Truth Social, Trump claimed he will nullify any executive order from the Biden administration signed with an autopen or "anything else that was not directly signed" by Biden himself, and warned that Biden "will be brought up on charges of perjury" if he claims involvement in the autopen process. Trump has admitted to using the autopen himself and lacks legal authority to nullify Biden's pardons, which included his son and Jan. 6 investigators.

Supporting reports

• Trump announces plan to cancel most Biden executive orders based on autopen signature claims — Donald Trump declared via social media that he intends to cancel approximately 92% of Joe Biden's executive orders, claiming baselessly that Biden did not personally authorize them and that White House staff used an autopen signature machine without his approval. Trump alleged Biden was not involved in the autopen process and threatened perjury charges if Biden claimed otherwise. The announcement prompted Republican celebration, including statements from the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project and House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, though legal experts warned such actions could set problematic precedents.
• Trump announced cancellation of executive orders signed via Autopen — Trump posted that he is "hereby cancelling all Executive Orders, and anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden, because the people who operated the Autopen did so illegally." Trump claimed that if Biden says he was involved in the Autopen process, Biden will be "brought up on charges of perjury." Legal experts noted that perjury charges require false statements made under oath and that presidents now have immunity following Trump's Supreme Court appeal.
• Trump claimed authority to nullify Biden's autopen-signed executive orders — On Truth Social, Trump claimed he will nullify any executive order from the Biden administration signed with an autopen or "anything else that was not directly signed" by Biden himself, and warned that Biden "will be brought up on charges of perjury" if he claims involvement in the autopen process. Trump has admitted to using the autopen himself and lacks legal authority to nullify Biden's pardons, which included his son and Jan. 6 investigators.

Supporting reports

• Trump vows to strip citizenship from naturalized immigrants and pause migration from "third-world countries" — Over Thanksgiving, President Trump announced plans to strip US citizenship from naturalized immigrants "who undermine domestic tranquility," permanently pause migration from all "third-world countries," and deport any foreign national deemed "non-compatible with Western Civilization." These statements represent a sweeping attack on naturalized citizenship rights and blanket restrictions on immigration based on national origin and cultural criteria.
• Trump announces plan to denaturalize naturalized citizens and permanently pause migration from "Third World Countries" — In a Thanksgiving social media post, Trump announced a dramatic purge of immigrants, stating he would "permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries," "terminate all of the millions of Biden illegal admissions," "remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States," "end all Federal benefits and subsidies to noncitizens," "denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility," and "deport any Foreign National who is a public charge, security risk, or non-compatible with Western Civilization." The denaturalization proposal targets the nation's 24.5 million naturalized citizens. From 1990 to 2017, only about 11 people per year lost citizenship, typically for hidden criminal activity or human rights violations.
• Trump announced permanent pause on migration from "Third World Countries" and denaturalization policy — On Truth Social, Trump announced his administration will "permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries" and stated the US will "remove anyone who is not a net asset," denaturalize migrants deemed to undermine "domestic tranquility," and deport foreign nationals classified as public charges, security risks, or "non-compatible with Western Civilization." The announcement provided no implementation details but signaled a sweeping expansion of immigration restrictions beyond existing policy.
• Trump threatened to de-naturalize immigrant citizens — President Trump threatened to revoke citizenship from immigrants who have already become American citizens, claiming they are "non-compatible with Western civilization." This threat targets naturalized citizens based on national origin.
• Trump posted offensive social media message threatening citizenship stripping on Thanksgiving — On Thanksgiving at midnight, President Trump posted on his social media account threatening to strip citizenship from naturalized immigrants, used an offensive slur to describe Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and ended with a message excluding those who "hate, steal, murder, and destroy everything that America stands for." The post raised concerns among officials and medical experts about the president's mental acuity and fitness for office.

Supporting reports

• Georgia prosecutor dismisses Trump racketeering case — Pete Skandalakis, the prosecutor who took over the Georgia election interference case after Fani Willis's disqualification, filed for dismissal of charges against Trump and co-defendants on Wednesday. Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee issued a one-page order dismissing the 2020 racketeering case. The case had accused Trump and 18 others of participating in a scheme to illegally overturn Trump's 2020 loss in Georgia, centered on his call asking the secretary of state to "find 11,780 votes." Trump posted on Truth Social celebrating the dismissal and attacking Willis and Democrats.
• Fulton County prosecutor dismissed election interference charges against Trump — The new Fulton County prosecutor dismissed charges against Trump and his co-conspirators in Georgia for 2020 election interference.
• Georgia prosecutor drops racketeering case against Trump — A Georgia prosecutor dropped the racketeering case against Trump and his allies for their efforts to conspire to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The prosecutor cited the complexity of legal issues including constitutional questions, immunity, jurisdiction, venue, and speedy-trial concerns, noting that bringing the case before a jury could take until 2029, 2030, or 2031.

Supporting reports

• Vice President Vance claimed congressional reminders of Constitution are illegal — Vice President JD Vance stated that if the president has not issued illegal orders, then members of Congress telling the military to defy the president is by definition illegal. This statement contradicts the constitutional duty of military personnel to refuse unlawful orders and the right of Congress to remind them of that duty.

Supporting reports

• Rep. Jason Crow detailed Trump's threats to use military unlawfully — Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO) appeared on CBS and detailed Trump's threats to use the military in unlawful ways, including sending troops into Chicago, into polling stations, killing terrorists' families, and shooting peaceful protesters. Crow stated that Trump cannot tolerate members of Congress reminding service members of their constitutional duty to obey the law and resorts to threats of violence and arrest.
• Pentagon announces investigation of Senator Mark Kelly for video calling troops to refuse illegal orders — The Pentagon announced an investigation into Arizona Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy captain, after he participated in a video with other Democratic lawmakers calling on US troops to refuse unlawful orders. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated the video was "despicable" and that Kelly's conduct undermines military discipline. The Pentagon cited federal law allowing recall of retired service members to active duty for possible court-martial. Kelly responded that the investigation was meant to intimidate Congress and vowed not to be silenced.
• Defense Department announced investigation of Senator Kelly for alleged misconduct and threatened recall to active duty — The Defense Department posted on social media that it was investigating Senator Mark Kelly following "serious allegations of misconduct" and suggested that Kelly could be recalled to active duty "for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures." This announcement came after Kelly participated in a November 18 video with five other Democratic veterans in Congress warning military and intelligence personnel of their legal right and duty to refuse unlawful orders.
• Department of War initiated review of Senator Mark Kelly for potential court-martial — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that the Department of War has initiated a review of retired Navy Captain Mark Kelly (D-AZ) for potential recall to active duty and court-martial proceedings. The review stems from a video Kelly made with five other Democratic lawmakers informing service members of their constitutional duty to refuse unlawful orders. The DOD statement cited 10 U.S.C. § 688 and 18 U.S.C. § 2387, which prohibits actions intended to interfere with military loyalty, morale, and discipline. Hegseth characterized the video as "despicable" and "seditious."
• Trump posted threats against Senator Mark Kelly — President Trump posted on social media that Senator Mark Kelly should be "arrested, hanged, and put to death" in response to Kelly's video encouraging service members to follow the Constitution and refuse unlawful orders. Kelly responded by reaffirming his oath to the Constitution and stating that Trump's threats would not intimidate him or other members of Congress from holding the administration accountable.
• Pete Hegseth orders Navy investigation into Mark Kelly's video comments — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memorandum to Navy Secretary John Phelan on Tuesday ordering an investigation into "potentially unlawful comments" made by Senator Mark Kelly and fellow Democrats in a social media video encouraging military personnel to refuse unlawful orders. The Pentagon had already announced an investigation on Monday. Hegseth requested a brief by December 10. The group faces FBI counter-terrorism inquiry and potential court-martial proceedings.
• Defense Secretary Hegseth directs Navy review of Senator Kelly — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared a memo directing the Navy secretary to review Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) for "potentially unlawful conduct" related to the viral video where Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers urged military members to resist illegal orders. The memo requested the Navy review be completed and briefed to Hegseth by December 10.
• Defense Secretary threatens Senator with court martial over military dissent video — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened Senator Mark Kelly with court martial after Kelly recorded a video with five Democratic lawmakers warning military members to question unlawful orders, apparently in reference to the Caribbean boat strikes. The threat represents potential retaliation against a senator for encouraging military personnel to uphold constitutional obligations.
• Secretary of Defense Hegseth threatens court martial of Senator Mark Kelly — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth threatened to court martial Senator Mark Kelly in response to Kelly's video urging military personnel to follow the law and refuse illegal orders. Hegseth called the video "sedition" and made deranged social media posts attacking Kelly's uniform and medals, later claiming Kelly's image was reversed by his phone. Kelly responded that the threat was about intimidation and the media cycle, not law, and refused to be silenced.
• Trump threatened to court-martial Senator Mark Kelly over military discipline video — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth threatened to court-martial Senator Mark Kelly after Kelly released a video with five other Democratic lawmakers urging military members not to follow illegal orders. The video was released in response to the alleged illegal directives issued by Hegseth regarding lethal operations.

Supporting reports

• Trump reverses position and calls for Epstein files release after Republican defection — After months of opposing the release of Epstein documents and warring with Republican congressmembers Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene, Trump performed a U-turn when approximately 100 Republicans prepared to vote for release despite his opposition. Trump then called for the documents to be made public, reframing his capitulation as a strategic move. Fox News subsequently presented the reversal as Trump "calling their bluff" and a masterstroke rather than a forced concession.

Supporting reports

• Trump accuses Democratic lawmakers of sedition on Truth Social — Trump posted on Truth Social targeting six Democratic lawmakers who published a video urging military members to refuse illegal orders. Trump accused them of sedition "AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL" and stated they "SHOULD BE IN JAIL RIGHT NOW." He later shared a post calling them "traitorous sons of bitches" who should be "impeached and prosecuted."
• Trump demands arrest and execution of Democratic lawmakers for sedition — On Thursday, President Trump posted on social media that the Democratic lawmakers' video constituted "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL" and demanded each lawmaker be "ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL." In a follow-up post, he stated the behavior was "punishable by DEATH." Trump continued attacking the lawmakers over the following two days. The posts represent a sitting president calling for the arrest and capital punishment of elected members of Congress for speech he perceives as threatening to his policies.
• Trump invoked stolen 2020 election claim and labeled critics "traitors" — Trump reiterated the false claim that the 2020 election was "stolen" and attacked Democratic lawmakers, veterans, and former intelligence officials who reminded U.S. troops they cannot obey unlawful orders, calling these Americans "traitors." Trump's team reposted comments suggesting George Washington would have hanged such individuals.
• Trump posted calls for execution of Democrats for treason — Trump posted on social media that Democrats who told the military to disobey his orders should be executed for sedition, calling it "a major crime" and "sedition at the highest level." He made two additional posts at midnight Saturday repeating the accusation and claiming "many great legal scholars" agreed the Democrats had committed serious crimes.
• Trump accuses Kelly and other Democrats of sedition punishable by death — President Trump posted on Truth Social that Senator Kelly and other Democrats who participated in the video had engaged in "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH" and reposted another user's message saying "HANG THEM." Kelly subsequently stated that Trump's language made him fear for his family's safety, particularly given his wife Gabrielle Giffords' prior assassination attempt in 2011.
• Trump Posts Calls for Senator Kelly's Arrest and Execution — President Trump posted on social media calling for Senator Mark Kelly's arrest, hanging, and execution in response to Kelly's participation in a video reminding servicemembers of their duty to refuse unlawful orders. The posts were part of the administration's escalating rhetoric against lawmakers who have questioned the legality of military operations, including deadly strikes on civilians in small boats near Venezuela.
• Trump calls for execution of Senator Kelly for advising troops on illegal orders — President Trump posted on social media that Senator Mark Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers "should be in jail right now" and characterized their video advising military personnel to refuse illegal orders as "seditious behaviour at the highest level, punishable by DEATH." Trump also republished a post containing the phrase "hang them." Kelly responded that Trump's threats were intended to intimidate Congress from holding the administration accountable.

Supporting reports

• Federal court rejects Trump's authority to independently mobilize D.C. National Guard for policing — On November 20, a federal court rejected Trump's assertion that he had the right to independently mobilize the D.C. National Guard for routine police work. The judge found that the deployment of more than 2,000 Guard troops to Washington was unlawful and violated the District's right to govern itself, establishing a significant legal constraint on the president's domestic military deployment authority.
• Court ruled National Guard deployment in Washington D.C. illegal but stayed order pending government appeal — On November 20, 2025, a court ruled that the deployment of the National Guard in the District of Columbia was illegal but stayed the order ending the deployment until December 11 to permit the government to appeal the decision.
• Case update — District of Columbia v. Trump (D.D.C.) 1:25-cv-03005 — Judge Cobb temporarily blocked the administration from using the D.C. National Guard for crime control in the District and from using out-of-state Guards. The order is slated to take effect on Dec. 11 in order to “permit orderly proceedings on appeal.”

Supporting reports

• Trump accused six veteran lawmakers of sedition and called for their execution over military law video — On November 20, 2025, two days after six Democratic lawmakers with military backgrounds (Senators Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin; Representatives Chrissy Houlahan, Chris Deluzio, Jason Crow, and Maggie Goodlander) posted a one-minute video instructing troops that they can and must refuse illegal orders, Donald Trump posted on Truth Social calling them "traitors" and accusing them of "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" The video restated existing military law under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Manual for Courts-Martial, which require service members to refuse patently illegal orders. Trump's accusation triggered federal investigations.
• Trump threatens execution of Democratic lawmakers in social media posts — On the morning of November 20, 2025, President Trump posted a series of messages on social media labeling Democratic senators and representatives "traitors" and accusing them of "seditious behavior punishable by death." He reposted extremist messages urging that lawmakers be hanged, including one stating "George Washington would hang them." Trump demanded the lawmakers "should be arrested and put on trial" and warned "We won't have a country anymore" unless they are punished. The threats were directed at lawmakers who had released a video reminding U.S. service members of their obligation to refuse unlawful orders.
• Trump called for arrest and execution of Democratic lawmakers who released military oath video — On November 20, President Trump posted multiple messages on social media calling for the arrest and execution of six Democratic lawmakers—Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly, and Representatives Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, Chrissy Houlahan, and Jason Crow—who had released a video on November 19 reminding military and intelligence officers of their duty to refuse illegal orders. Trump labeled their speech "seditious behavior" and "treason," reposting calls for them to be "frog marched" from their homes and "hanged." By noon, the White House issued a statement clarifying that Trump does not want to execute members of Congress.
• Trump called for execution by hanging of Democratic lawmakers — Trump posted on Truth Social calling for the execution by hanging of two Democratic senators (Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin) and four representatives (Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, Chrissy Houlahan, Jason Crow) after they released a video reminding military and intelligence personnel of their constitutional oath and legal right to refuse unlawful orders. Trump labeled their statements "seditious behavior" punishable by death and reposted a cultist's message saying "HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD!!"
• Trump posts Truth Social messages accusing Democratic lawmakers of seditious behavior punishable by death — On Thursday morning, President Trump posted multiple messages on Truth Social accusing six Democratic lawmakers (Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly; Representatives Maggie Goodlander, Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan, and Jason Crow) of "seditious behavior" after they released a video telling active military personnel they can and must refuse illegal orders. Trump wrote "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH" and called for their arrest and trial. Democratic leaders condemned the posts as death threats and calls for political violence; the White House later clarified Trump does not want to execute them but was responding to what it characterized as encouragement of military insubordination.
• Trump threatened serious legal consequences for Democratic lawmakers over military video — Trump stated on Fox News that Democratic lawmakers who produced a video reminding troops they do not have to follow unlawful orders were "in serious trouble" and suggested that historically such conduct was "punishable by death" for seditious behavior. Trump indicated that Deputy Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and military courts were investigating the matter. Trump did not explicitly threaten execution but repeatedly invoked historical capital punishment for sedition.

Supporting reports

• House of Representatives voted 427–1 to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act. — After four months of delays and Speaker Johnson's early adjournment to prevent signatures, the House voted on legislation requiring the Department of Justice to release unclassified Epstein-related records. The vote passed 427–1, with only Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) voting no and five members not voting. The overwhelming bipartisan support reversed Trump's earlier opposition to the bill; Trump had called it a "hoax" and withdrawn endorsements from Republicans supporting it before reversing position on November 17.
• House passes Epstein Files Transparency Act 427–1 — The House of Representatives voted 427–1 to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act, directing the Department of Justice to release all unclassified Epstein-related records within 30 days with victims' names redacted. Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana cast the sole opposing vote, arguing the bill abandoned criminal justice procedure protections. Five members did not vote. The Senate has already agreed via unanimous consent to pass the bill immediately upon receipt from the House.
• House votes on Epstein Files Transparency Act discharge petition — The House voted on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a discharge petition requiring Attorney General Pam Bondi to release sealed Justice Department investigative files within 30 days, including flight logs, travel records, witness transcripts, immunity deals, and records related to Epstein's death in federal custody. The vote followed four months of procedural delays by Speaker Johnson, including early adjournment and withholding the swearing-in of Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ), whose signature provided the 218th required for the discharge petition. Trump initially opposed the bill, withdrew his endorsement from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene over her support, then reversed position on Sunday and said he would sign it if it reached his desk.
• House passes bill to release Epstein files; Massie and Khanna call for accountability — The U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation to force the complete release of Department of Justice files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) held a press conference with Epstein survivors outside the Capitol, calling for the same accountability faced by UK figures tied to Epstein, including Prince Andrew's loss of titles and Peter Mandelson's removal as ambassador. Khanna renewed calls for Prince Andrew to testify before the House oversight committee.
• House passes Epstein Files Transparency Act with overwhelming bipartisan support — The House of Representatives voted 427–1 on November 18, 2025, to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act, requiring the Justice Department to release all unclassified materials related to Jeffrey Epstein. The Senate unanimously agreed to expedite passage. President Trump, who initially resisted the measure, reversed course on November 17 and called for release, declaring "we have nothing to hide." The bill now awaits Trump's signature at the White House.
• House prepares vote on legislation to compel release of Epstein-related government files — The House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on legislation requiring the release of US government files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Democrats and four dissident Republicans gathered sufficient signatures to force the vote over objections from Speaker Mike Johnson. Initially, Trump opposed the legislation, but reversed course on Sunday evening and called for its approval. The bill's passage in the Senate remains uncertain, with Subramanyam predicting Trump will pressure the Republican majority to block it.
• House passed bipartisan Epstein files disclosure resolution — The House passed a bipartisan resolution sponsored by Representatives Ro Khanna (D) and Thomas Massie (R) compelling the Department of Justice to release the entire contents of Epstein investigative files, with the exception of victim information. The vote was 427–1, with only Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) voting against. The resolution now advances to the Senate. The measure followed a discharge petition after Speaker Mike Johnson initially declined to bring it to a floor vote.
• Senate passed legislation to force DOJ to release Epstein files — The Senate passed legislation to force the Justice Department to release the Epstein Files within 30 days by unanimous consent after only one House lawmaker voted against it earlier in the day, moving the bill to Trump's desk. One administration official told Zeteo, "We lost this one badly."
• House passes bipartisan bill to force release of DOJ Epstein files — The House of Representatives passed a bipartisan bill on Tuesday to compel the release of justice department records related to Jeffrey Epstein. The measure secured overwhelming support after Donald Trump reversed his five-month opposition and called on Republicans to back it. Epstein survivors, joined by Representatives Ro Khanna, Thomas Massie, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, held a news conference outside the Capitol demanding accountability and transparency. The bill now moves to the Senate.
• House passes Epstein Files Transparency Act with near-unanimous vote — The U.S. House of Representatives voted 427-1 on November 18 to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation requiring the release of investigative documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. The Senate approved the bill by unanimous consent the following day. President Trump, who had initially opposed the measure, reversed course and indicated he would sign it. The sole dissenting vote came from Louisiana Republican Clay Higgins, who cited concerns about protecting witness identities.
• House passes Epstein Files Transparency Act — The House of Representatives voted 427–1 to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates the release of all unclassified Epstein-related records within 30 days, with victims' names redacted. The bill now moves to the Senate, where it is expected to pass immediately under a unanimous-consent agreement. The bill will then be sent to President Trump, who has stated he will sign it. However, a recent directive from Trump to the Department of Justice to open a new investigation into Epstein's connections may allow the DOJ to withhold records under the bill's "ongoing investigations" exception.
• Senate agrees to pass Epstein Files bill via unanimous consent — Senate Majority Leader John Thune announced that the Senate has agreed via unanimous consent to pass the Epstein Files Transparency Act the moment it arrives from the House, expected Wednesday morning. No senator objected to the unanimous-consent motion. The bill will proceed directly to the President's desk without amendments or delay.
• Senate passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act by unanimous consent. — The Senate passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act by unanimous consent without debate, moving the legislation to the president within hours of House passage. The rapid Senate action followed the House's 427–1 vote.
• Senate passes Epstein Files Transparency Act by unanimous consent — The Senate passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act by unanimous consent after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer requested and obtained agreement for automatic passage upon the bill's arrival. Senate Majority Leader John Thune declined to delay or amend the measure, bypassing House Speaker Mike Johnson's expectation that the Senate would stall the bill with amendments.
• Became Law: Epstein Files Transparency Act — Congress enacted the Epstein Files Transparency Act (Public Law 119-38), requiring the disclosure of sealed documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal case. The law mandates the release of previously withheld records to the public, expanding access to judicial proceedings and evidence. This legislative action increases transparency in a high-profile criminal matter of significant public interest.

Supporting reports

• Transgender Air Force members sue Trump administration over revoked early retirement benefits — Seventeen transgender U.S. Air Force members filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's decision to deny them early retirement pensions and benefits. The Air Force revoked early retirement eligibility for transgender service members with 15–18 years of experience, effectively forcing them out without retirement support. The plaintiffs argue the revocation is "unlawful and invalid" and seek reinstatement of retirement orders, correction of military records, and damages including attorney's fees.

Supporting reports

• Transgender Air Force members sue Trump administration over revoked early retirement benefits — Seventeen transgender U.S. Air Force members filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's decision to deny them early retirement pensions and benefits. The Air Force revoked early retirement eligibility for transgender service members with 15–18 years of experience, effectively forcing them out without retirement support. The plaintiffs argue the revocation is "unlawful and invalid" and seek reinstatement of retirement orders, correction of military records, and damages including attorney's fees.

Supporting reports

• Marjorie Taylor Greene announces resignation from Congress — Republican Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene announced her resignation effective January 5, 2026, citing "unfair and wrong" treatment by President Trump after he withdrew his endorsement. Greene stated she faced death threats and personal attacks following Trump's withdrawal of support. Trump responded by calling the resignation "great news for the country." The move shocked political observers and prompted speculation about Greene's future political ambitions.
• Marjorie Taylor Greene announces resignation from Congress effective January 5, 2026 — Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene announced her resignation from the House of Representatives, effective January 5, 2026, citing souring relations with President Trump and frustration with the legislative branch being "sidelined." Greene, a former Trump ally, broke with the administration over the Epstein files release, Israel policy, healthcare subsidies, and other issues. Trump responded by calling the resignation "great news for the country." Greene's departure will further narrow House Speaker Mike Johnson's already thin majority.
• Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene announces she will not seek reelection — On November 21, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) announced in a public letter that she would not run for reelection. In the letter, she attacked Trump and "Establishment Republicans," called out Trump's threats to primary her, and stated, "I refuse to be a 'battered wife' hoping it all goes away and gets better." Three days later, Jake Sherman of Punchbowl News reported that her letter "rang true to" many House Republicans, with a senior House Republican describing widespread dissatisfaction with the White House team's treatment of members and predicting more early resignations and loss of the House majority.
• Trump withdraws support for Marjorie Taylor Greene over Epstein records stance — Marjorie Taylor Greene, a prominent Republican and supporter of former President Trump, announced her resignation from Congress effective January 5, 2026. Her decision follows a public break with Trump after she pushed for the release of the Epstein files, which Trump initially resisted. Greene cited threats from Trump and described her Republican colleagues as "terrified" to oppose him publicly. Her resignation highlights internal tensions within the Republican Party and signals a shift in her stance towards Trump.
• Trump attacked Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and withdrew endorsement — President Trump withdrew his support for Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene on Friday after she criticized his handling of the Epstein records and refused to remove her name from the discharge petition forcing a House vote. Greene had publicly opposed Trump's initial resistance to releasing the files and stood with survivors demanding transparency. Trump reportedly called her a "traitor" for her stance.
• Trump withdrew endorsement of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene — Trump posted angrily at Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), calling her a traitor, "wacky," and a "ranting Lunatic." He announced he was withdrawing his endorsement of her and would support another Republican to replace her in her district. This attack came after Greene and other House Republicans indicated they would vote to release the Epstein files despite Trump's initial opposition.
• Trump attacks Marjorie Taylor Greene with inflammatory rhetoric over Epstein files disagreement — Trump posted statements withdrawing his endorsement of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, calling her "wacky" and accusing her of complaining excessively. He stated he would support a primary challenger against her in Georgia and claimed she had "gone Far Left." Greene responded by stating she was receiving security warnings about threats to her safety fueled by Trump's rhetoric, drawing parallels to threats faced by Jeffrey Epstein victims. The exchange sparked internal MAGA conflict, with supporters divided over the dispute.
• Marjorie Taylor Greene announced resignation from Congress, citing Trump retaliation over Epstein files advocacy — Trump repeatedly attacked House Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene over the weekend, calling her a "traitor" and using other insults after she publicly stated that releasing the Epstein files was "the easiest thing in the world" and criticized efforts to block their release. Greene responded on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday, stating that Trump's rhetoric "can radicalize people against me and put my life in danger." She subsequently reported receiving hoax pizza deliveries and a pipe bomb threat directed at her construction company.
• — On November 21, 2025, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene announced her resignation from Congress, effective January 5, 2026. Greene stated she faced retaliation from Trump after publicly advocating for release of the Epstein files and criticizing Trump's initial resistance. On 60 Minutes, she said standing up for trafficking victims "should not result in me being called a traitor and threatened by the President." Trump responded by calling her a traitor and "very dumb" on Truth Social and promised to back a replacement candidate.

Supporting reports

• Border Patrol agents approached workers at residential property in Charlotte — Two CBP agents walked into the front yard of homeowner Rheba Hamilton on Saturday morning during Operation Charlotte's Web. One agent attempted to speak to workers in Spanish who were putting up Christmas decorations. The workers did not respond and the agents left without making arrests, but the incident made residents realize that no location was safe from enforcement activity.
• Border Patrol conducted "Operation Charlotte's Web" ICE raids in Charlotte, North Carolina, arresting 81 people in five hours. — Border Patrol launched coordinated immigration enforcement operations in Charlotte on Saturday, November 15, resulting in 81 arrests within five hours. The raids included documented cases of excessive force, such as a U.S. citizen having his car window smashed and being thrown to the ground despite presenting citizenship documents. The enforcement action prompted widespread fear in the community, with churches closing doors, dental clinics reporting cancelled appointments, and local businesses shuttering. Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, who previously led operations in Chicago (3,000+ arrests) and Los Angeles, directed the Charlotte operation.
• Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department stated it does not participate in federal immigration enforcement — The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department emphasized that it is not involved in federal immigration enforcement and has no authority to enforce federal immigration laws. This statement clarified the department's non-participation in Operation Charlotte's Web.
• Operation Charlotte's Web arrested 81 people in five-hour immigration enforcement action — Federal Border Patrol agents launched "Operation Charlotte's Web" in Charlotte, North Carolina on Saturday, November 15, arresting 81 people in approximately five hours. The operation, led by Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino and announced by DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, targeted what officials claimed were "violent criminal illegal aliens" and cited 1,400 unexecuted immigration detainers. On the ground, agents conducted stops at businesses, churches, apartment complexes, and residential areas; smashed car windows; and detained U.S. citizens including naturalized citizen Willy Aceituno, who was released only after producing citizenship documents. Local law enforcement did not participate. Hundreds of residents protested Saturday afternoon in uptown Charlotte.
• Willy Aceituno detained despite presenting U.S. citizenship documents — Willy Aceituno, a 46-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen, was stopped twice by Border Patrol agents on Saturday morning during Operation Charlotte's Web. During the second encounter, agents broke his car window, forced him from his vehicle, and threw him to the ground. When he stated he was an American citizen, agents detained him anyway and only released him after he produced citizenship documents. Aceituno reported agents questioned where he was born and expressed disbelief in his citizenship status.
• Federal immigration raids arrest 81 people in Charlotte, North Carolina — Federal Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents conducted Operation Charlotte's Web over the weekend of November 15–16, 2025, arresting at least 81 people in Charlotte, North Carolina. Videos showed agents chasing and apprehending people outside businesses; a U.S. citizen was forcibly removed from his vehicle; a teenage grocery store worker was arrested. Business districts in predominantly Latino neighborhoods came to a standstill. Local officials and advocacy groups reported this was the largest single-day immigration arrest in state history and criticized the lack of communication and constitutional violations.
• Federal immigration sweep in Charlotte, North Carolina — Federal immigration officers, including Customs and Border Protection and ICE agents, conducted enforcement operations in Charlotte, North Carolina on Saturday. Targets included a church where an arrest was made while parishioners performed yard work, workers hanging Christmas lights, and individuals stopped while driving. Local reports indicate agents made stops without clear identification or explanation, and at least one U.S. citizen was forcibly removed from his vehicle. Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated the surge was to "ensure Americans are safe and public safety threats are removed."
• Top Border Patrol official and agents planned to leave Chicago area — CBS News reported on November 10 that top US Border Patrol official Gregory Bovino and some of his agents could soon leave the Chicago area after the Trump administration made plans for their departure.
• Federal immigration sweep in Charlotte, North Carolina detains 130+ people — The Trump administration deployed border patrol agents to Charlotte, North Carolina over the weekend in an operation titled "Charlotte's Web," resulting in the detention of at least 130 people. Federal agents conducted aggressive arrests near churches, apartment complexes, and stores, with reports of masked, heavily armed agents in unmarked vehicles. Governor Josh Stein and Mayor Vi Lyles condemned the operation, citing racial profiling, targeting of U.S. citizens, and fear-mongering despite declining crime rates in the city. The Department of Homeland Security claimed those arrested had criminal records, though it provided no conviction details.
• ICE and CBP conduct mass immigration enforcement sweep in Charlotte, North Carolina — US Customs and Border Protection agents, led by Gregory Bovino, conducted a large-scale immigration enforcement operation in Charlotte, North Carolina on Saturday, resulting in 81 arrests. The operation, dubbed "Operation Charlotte's Web," targeted the Democratic-led city of 950,000 despite declining crime rates and fierce objections from local leaders. Reports indicate agents conducted sweeps near churches, apartment complexes, and other community spaces, causing widespread fear and prompting business closures and medical appointment cancellations among immigrant communities.
• Border Patrol Deployment in Charlotte — Border Patrol agents, led by Gregory Bovino, have been deployed to Charlotte, North Carolina, following their operations in Chicago. This move has raised concerns about racial profiling and the lack of due process, as reports indicate that at least one American citizen was racially profiled and forcibly removed from his vehicle. The presence of Border Patrol in Charlotte, a city with a significant immigrant population, has led to fears of increased racial profiling and deportations without due process. Protests and community actions are being organized in response to these developments.
• ICE and Border Patrol Deployment in North Carolina — The federal administration has deployed ICE and Border Patrol agents to the Raleigh/Durham area in North Carolina, causing significant disruption and fear among immigrant communities. This deployment is described as a tactic to destabilize communities and intimidate families. In response, local organizations such as SiembraNC and Southern Vision Alliance are mobilizing to provide support and protection for affected individuals. Community members are encouraged to report ICE sightings and participate in organized actions to safeguard vulnerable populations.
• CBP agents raid OurBridge after-school program in Charlotte — On Monday, November 18, 2025, Customs and Border Protection agents attempted to raid OurBridge, an after-school program serving children from multiple countries including Tanzania. The program's director stated the raid's goal was to "instill fear" and called it "unnecessary, unacceptable and another direct attack on the safety of our community." OurBridge halted services indefinitely and staff ceased media engagement.
• US Border Patrol conducts mass immigration raids in Charlotte, North Carolina — US Customs and Border Protection, led by regional chief Greg Bovino, conducted a series of immigration raids in Charlotte, North Carolina, resulting in over 100 arrests. The operation, called "Operation Charlotte's Web," involved agents conducting enforcement actions near churches, apartment complexes, and stores. Governor Josh Stein criticized the crackdown as "stoking fear." Legal experts note that while border patrol has authority to operate up to 100 miles from international boundaries (which includes Charlotte via the Atlantic coastline), operations outside that zone must comply with standard constitutional protections requiring reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
• Charlotte-Mecklenburg school district experiences mass absenteeism due to ICE enforcement fear — On Monday, November 18, 2025, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school district (141,000+ students, ~30% Latino) recorded over 30,000 absences, compared to the normal 9,000–10,000. Teachers reported Hispanic students and families with undocumented members refusing to attend school out of fear of ICE enforcement. One teacher noted half her special-needs class was absent, with three Hispanic students citing fear. Parents kept children home, including a blind and autistic daughter, until they felt safe.
• ICE agents raid Latino church in Charlotte during weekend enforcement — During the weekend of November 19–20, 2025, immigration agents raided a Latino church in Charlotte, making an arrest in front of the congregation. The raid caused attendees to scatter into the woods. The incident led to cancellation of a scheduled entrepreneurship event at Camino church on Thursday, November 20, as organizers prioritized community safety.
• ICE and CBP surge enforcement operations in Charlotte, North Carolina, detaining citizens and noncitizens indiscriminately — Federal immigration agents from ICE and Customs and Border Protection launched "Operation Charlotte's Web" on November 19, 2025, surging enforcement across Charlotte and later Raleigh-Durham. The operation resulted in over 250 arrests statewide. Agents conducted warrantless stops, detained U.S. citizens including Puerto Rican-born Gerardo Ortiz twice, and raided an after-school program (OurBridge) serving children. The enforcement created widespread fear, causing 30,000+ school absences, business closures on immigrant-heavy Central Avenue, and community members to avoid work and public spaces.
• U.S. citizen Gerardo Ortiz detained twice by federal agents in Charlotte — Gerardo Ortiz, a Puerto Rican-born U.S. citizen, was detained twice by federal immigration agents on November 19 and 20, 2025, while protesting in Charlotte. Agents emerged from vans, restrained him with hands behind his back, and transported him 20 blocks away to a parking lot before releasing him. Ortiz reported severe emotional distress and stated he felt he had lost his liberty. He had no prior arrest history.

Supporting reports

• FBI launches domestic terrorism investigations into anti-ICE protest activity across 23 regions — The FBI opened "criminal and domestic terrorism investigations" into "threats against immigration enforcement activity" in at least 23 field office regions nationwide, according to an internal November 14 report obtained by the Guardian. The investigations are partly linked to Trump's September memo (NSPM-7) on countering "domestic terrorism," which characterized anti-ICE protests and anti-fascist activism as "violent and terroristic activities." The FBI report identifies "indicators" of planned attacks including online research about ICE personnel movements and use of encrypted messaging apps, raising civil liberties concerns about surveillance of First Amendment-protected activity.

Supporting reports

• Trump signed pardons for 77 election subversion conspirators — Trump signed pardons for 77 individuals involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Sidney Powell, and fake electors who had already pleaded guilty. The pardons were signed Friday and announced Sunday night during government shutdown media coverage. The timing and announcement strategy obscured the action from public attention during competing news cycles.
• Trump withdrew endorsement from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene over Epstein file support — President Trump withdrew his endorsement from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) on Friday, November 14, citing her support for releasing the Epstein investigation files. Greene stated the withdrawal was directly tied to her position on the transparency measure, representing a use of presidential political power to punish a member of Congress for supporting government disclosure.
• Trump withdrew endorsement of Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene — President Trump announced he was "withdrawing my support and Endorsement of 'Congresswoman' Marjorie Taylor Greene" and attacked Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY), calling him a "LOSER," in response to their votes in favor of releasing the Epstein files compiled by the FBI. Greene responded that Trump was "coming after me hard to make an example to scare all the other Republicans before next weeks vote to release the Epstein files," stating she would not "worship or serve Donald Trump."

Supporting reports

• Trump claimed government lacks funds to refund tariff revenue if Supreme Court rules against tariff authority — Trump stated in public remarks that the federal government cannot afford to repay tariff revenue collected if the Supreme Court rules against his tariff authority, claiming repayment would exceed $3 trillion and constitute a "National Security Event." Trump also accused justices opposed to his position of "giving low Numbers" to make the case appear easy to resolve. The administration lost twice in lower courts on the tariff issue and made no fiscal preparations for a potential loss.
• Trump claimed tariff ruling would cost $2–3 trillion and constitute national security catastrophe — President Trump stated on Monday that if the Supreme Court ruled his tariffs unconstitutional, the U.S. would owe "in excess of $2 Trillion Dollars," later increasing the figure to $3 trillion, and characterized this as a "National Security catastrophe." He blamed "Anarchists and Thugs" for challenging his tariffs. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated the actual figure at approximately $195 billion. The Supreme Court had heard arguments on tariff constitutionality on November 5.