Narrow these 4 — tap a value to filter:
Open an event to see its evidence. Attack and trait tags link to their definitions
Sep 11, 2026 Missouri Republican legislators threatened impeachment of state supreme court justices over the redistricting contempt ruling Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
Lawmakers attempted to coerce the judiciary into abandoning enforcement of voter-approved redistricting protections, an unrealized but serious threat to judicial independence.
Supporting reports
- Missouri Republican legislators threatened impeachment of state Supreme Court justices over redistricting ruling — Missouri Republican lawmakers sent a letter threatening impeachment of state Supreme Court justices if they held Secretary of State Hoskins in contempt for defying a court order on redistricting. The letter, sent before the U.S. Supreme Court intervened, insisted that Hoskins comply with the federal judge's order and questioned whether the state Supreme Court understood that federal law is "supreme." The impeachment threat was ultimately not carried out.
Sep 11, 2026 Utah Republicans threatened impeachment of a judge enforcing a constitutional gerrymandering ban, then packed the state supreme court Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
When impeachment threats failed to alter a judge's redistricting rulings, lawmakers restructured the court itself to overturn constitutional protections against gerrymandering.
Supporting reports
- Utah Republicans threatened to impeach judge over gerrymandering enforcement — Utah Republicans threatened to impeach a state judge for enforcing a constitutional ban on gerrymandering. When the impeachment threat did not succeed in stopping the judge's rulings, Republicans subsequently packed the state Supreme Court to overturn the judge's decisions and allow gerrymandered districts.
- Utah Republicans packed state Supreme Court to overturn redistricting protections — After their impeachment threat against a judge enforcing a constitutional ban on gerrymandering failed, Utah Republicans packed the state Supreme Court. This court-packing effort was designed to overturn judicial protections against gerrymandered districts and allow partisan redistricting to proceed.
Sep 9, 2026 Bob Good publicly questioned Trump's constitutional authority to issue dividend checks without Congress Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
A former House Freedom Caucus chair's public rebuke of the president's spending claim reflects intra-party concern over executive overreach into congressional spending power.
Supporting reports
- Former House Freedom Caucus Chair Good questions Trump's constitutional authority for dividend scheme — Former House Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good posted that most conservatives do not know or care that the president lacks constitutional authority to spend money or send dividend checks without Congress. He criticized Trump's statement that "only I can do it" and called the $5,000 dividend scheme a "socialist vote-buying scheme" that would cost $1 trillion.
Sep 9, 2026 Chip Roy questioned how Trump's proposed dividend checks would be financed Tier 1 · Primary Institutions and Governance
A sitting Republican congressman's skepticism about a trillion-dollar unfunded promise reflects fiscal-conservative concern within the president's own party.
Supporting reports
- Rep. Chip Roy questions financing of dividend scheme — Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) was asked if he supported Trump's $5,000 dividend scheme and responded by asking how it would be financed, noting the cost would be "well over $1 trillion," implying skepticism about the proposal's feasibility.