Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• US attorney general expresses skepticism about Trump third-term possibility — Pam Bondi, US attorney general and Trump loyalist, told Fox News Sunday that Trump is "probably going to be finished" after his current term ends on 20 January 2029, calling any attempt to circumvent the 22nd Amendment "a heavy lift." This came one week after Trump told NBC News he was "not joking" about pursuing a third term and claimed there were "methods" to do so, prompting speculation about constitutional workarounds.

Supporting reports

• Willkie Farr & Gallagher reaches settlement with Trump administration — Willkie Farr & Gallagher agreed on Tuesday to commit $100 million in pro bono work to causes championed by Trump and to cease race-based hiring practices. The firm, which employs Doug Emhoff (Kamala Harris's husband) and represented Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss in their successful defamation suit against Rudy Giuliani, settled to avoid a threatened executive order. Emhoff had advised the firm not to settle.
• Milbank LLP reaches settlement with Trump administration — Milbank LLP agreed on Wednesday to commit $100 million in pro bono work to settle with the Trump administration and avoid a threatened executive order. The firm recently hired Neal Katyal, a former acting solicitor general and prominent Supreme Court litigator who wrote a book arguing for Trump's impeachment, making it a likely target.
• Trump administration coerces law firms into settlements to avoid executive orders targeting political opponents — The Trump administration has pressured multiple major law firms into settlements by threatening executive orders that could harm their business. Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Milbank LLP each agreed to commit $100 million in pro bono work and accept restrictions on hiring practices. Earlier, Paul Weiss, Skadden Arps, and others settled similarly. The targeting appears aimed at firms representing Trump's political rivals or their associates, including those who represented election workers who sued Rudy Giuliani and those assisting Jack Smith. Some lawyers have quit in protest; others warn the settlements embolden further retaliation.
• Coalition of 21 state AGs warned law firms against surrendering to Trump threats — Delaware AG Kathy Jennings formed a coalition of 21 state AGs who signed a letter sent to the 100 largest law firms in the US. The letter warned firms not to surrender to Trump's threats and stated that recent Trump administration actions targeting law firms and attorneys, plus calls for impeachment of federal judges, represent a clear threat to the justice system. The letter cited the Paul, Weiss law firm's acquiescence to Trump's demands as an example of the chilling effect.
• Willkie Farr and Gallgher and Milbank LLP reach preemptive settlement deals with Trump administration — Two additional major law firms, Willkie Farr and Gallgher and Milbank LLP, reached preemptive settlement agreements with the Trump administration in early April to avoid being targeted by executive orders. These deals followed Skadden's March 28 settlement and occurred as other firms (Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, WilmerHale) successfully obtained court injunctions blocking most provisions of the administration's orders.
• Trump announces $100 million pro bono legal services deal — Trump on April 1 said he reached an agreement with a law firm to provide at least $100 million in pro bono legal services to support the president's agenda. Among the partners of the firm is former first gentleman Doug Emhoff. The arrangement raises questions about conflicts of interest and the use of private legal resources for presidential purposes.
• Trump announces second $100 million pro bono legal services deal — Trump on April 2 announced another deal with a law firm to provide $100 million in pro bono legal services. The second arrangement within days raises questions about the scope and purpose of private legal support for presidential activities.

Supporting reports

• Trump makes expansionist threats toward Greenland, Canada, Panama Canal, and Gaza — President Trump has made explicit public statements threatening U.S. acquisition of Greenland, Canada, the Panama Canal, and Gaza, departing from post-WWII norms against territorial conquest. These threats, combined with Trump's stated willingness to approve annexation elsewhere and his skepticism toward Ukraine's sovereignty, are creating what experts describe as a "permissive environment" that encourages other nations (Russia, China, Israel, Rwanda) to test territorial expansion. The statements represent an unprecedented break from the U.S. role as guarantor of the rules-based international order.
• Trump signals approval of territorial annexation by other nations — Trump's public statements and policy positions indicate willingness to approve or reward territorial conquest by other nations, particularly Russia's annexation of Ukrainian territory. Experts note this represents a fundamental shift in U.S. foreign policy from enforcing the post-WWII norm against conquest to tacitly endorsing it. This stance is emboldening other authoritarian leaders to test territorial expansion without fear of U.S. opposition, fundamentally altering the balance of power and international legal order.

Supporting reports

• Trump issues executive orders targeting Perkins Coie and Covington and Burling law firms — Trump issued executive orders targeting the law firms Perkins Coie and Covington and Burling, similar in structure to the Paul Weiss order. Perkins Coie was targeted over its ties to a lawyer who worked with Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign; Covington and Burling was targeted for representing former special counsel Jack Smith in litigation against the administration.
• Trump issues executive orders penalizing law firms Covington & Burling and Perkins Coie — President Trump issued executive orders targeting three major law firms—Covington & Burling, Perkins Coie, and Paul Weiss Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison—barring them from federal buildings, restricting agency interaction, and revoking security clearances from some lawyers. The orders were widely characterized as punitive retaliation against firms whose clients included former special counsel Jack Smith and Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign. District Judge Beryl Howell blocked enforcement against Perkins Coie on 12 March, citing First Amendment violations. Paul Weiss reversed the order on 19 March after agreeing to $40 million in pro bono services.
• Trump warned law firms to "behave themselves" — After the settlement with Paul Weiss, Trump warned that "law firms have to behave themselves." The warning signals that the administration will use executive power to target firms that do not comply with its preferences.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14246 suspending security clearances of Jenner & Block employees, restricting federal contracts, and limiting government access to the law firm. — President Trump issued Executive Order 14246 on March 25, 2025, targeting Jenner & Block LLP. The order directs the Attorney General and Director of National Intelligence to suspend active security clearances held by firm employees pending review. It requires federal agencies to cease provision of government goods, property, and services to the firm. Agencies must review all contracts with Jenner & Block, terminate contracts where the firm provides services, require contractors to disclose business relationships with the firm, and restrict official access and engagement between federal employees and firm staff, including attorney Andrew Weissmann.
• Trump signs executive orders targeting law firms challenging his administration — President Trump signed multiple executive orders targeting major law firms (Jenner & Block, Covington and Burling, Perkins Coie, Paul Weiss) that have represented his political opponents or employed prosecutors involved in investigations into Trump. The orders threaten to revoke security clearances, deny access to government buildings, and require government clients to disclose representation by these firms. Trump also directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate lawyers blocking administration priorities. Paul Weiss capitulated and accepted Trump's demands; Perkins Coie obtained a temporary restraining order blocking its order.
• Trump issued executive order targeting law firm Jenner & Block, suspending security clearances and restricting federal contracts. — President Trump issued an executive order on March 25, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by Jenner & Block LLP employees, cease provision of government goods and services to the firm, and review all federal contracts involving the firm for termination. The order alleges the firm engaged in "partisan lawfare," pro bono work undermining administration priorities, and employment discrimination. It specifically names attorney Andrew Weissmann and restricts federal employee engagement with firm staff.
• White House signed executive order targeting law firm Jenner & Block, directing suspension of security clearances and termination of federal contracts. — The White House issued an executive order on March 25, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by Jenner & Block LLP employees, cease provision of government services and facilities to the firm, terminate federal contracts with the firm, and restrict official access and hiring of its employees. The order characterizes the firm as engaging in "partisan lawfare," pro bono activities deemed harmful to U.S. interests, and alleged racial discrimination. The order specifically names attorney Andrew Weissmann and directs agencies to submit compliance assessments within 30 days.
• Trump signed order targeting law firm with Mueller connection — Trump signed another executive order targeting a law firm that once employed Andrew Weissman, the former deputy to Robert Mueller, who investigated Russian interference in the 2016 election. The order suspends security clearances of the firm's employees, terminates government contracts, and orders a review of the firm's compliance with civil rights laws against racial bias.
• Trump administration stripped security clearances from law firms and barred attorneys from federal buildings — The Trump administration issued executive orders stripping security clearances from Perkins Coie and Paul, Weiss law firms and barring their attorneys from entering federal buildings, including courthouses. The chair of Paul, Weiss stated the move "could easily have destroyed our firm." The orders targeted firms representing Trump's opponents in litigation.
• Trump signed executive order encouraging disciplinary action against attorneys filing litigation against the administration — President Trump signed an executive order directing the attorney general to refer attorneys for disciplinary action if they file "frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation" against the administration. Critics argue the order will have a chilling effect on litigation challenging government actions, and law firms have begun refusing to represent Trump's opponents out of fear of retaliation.
• Trump issues Executive Order 14250 suspending security clearances and restricting federal contracts with WilmerHale law firm — President Trump signed Executive Order 14250 directing the suspension of security clearances held by WilmerHale employees pending national-interest review, cessation of federal goods and services to the firm, termination of government contracts with WilmerHale, restrictions on federal building access for firm employees, and guidance against hiring WilmerHale staff. The order cites the firm's pro bono work, representation of immigration and voting-rights cases, and employment of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller as grounds for the action.
• Trump issued executive order targeting WilmerHale law firm with security clearance suspensions and federal contracting restrictions. — President Trump issued an executive order on March 27, 2025, directing federal agencies to suspend security clearances held by WilmerHale employees, cease provision of government goods and services to the firm, require federal contractors to disclose business relationships with WilmerHale, review and terminate relevant contracts, restrict WilmerHale employee access to federal buildings, and limit hiring of WilmerHale staff. The order cites the firm's pro bono work, representation of immigration and election-related cases, and employment of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller as grounds for the action.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14250 targeting WilmerHale law firm with security clearance suspensions, contract terminations, and personnel restrictions. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14250 on March 27, 2025, directing the suspension of security clearances held by WilmerHale employees pending review, cessation of government provision of materials and services to the firm, termination of federal contracts with WilmerHale, restrictions on federal employee access to WilmerHale staff, and limitations on hiring WilmerHale employees into government. The order characterizes the firm's pro bono work and representation of clients as threats to national security and American interests, and specifically names former Special Counsel Robert Mueller and colleagues as examples of "weaponization of government."
• Trump signed executive order suspending security clearances for WilmerHale employees and terminating federal contracts with the firm — President Trump signed an executive order on March 27, 2025, suspending security clearances held by WilmerHale employees pending review, halting federal material and services to the firm, restricting employee access to government buildings, terminating WilmerHale contracts, and barring federal agencies from hiring the firm's employees without authorization. The fact sheet characterizes WilmerHale as engaging in partisan activities, racial discrimination, and obstruction of immigration enforcement.
• Trump signed Executive Order 14253 directing removal of exhibits and narratives from federal museums and historical sites deemed ideologically divisive, with authority delegated to the Vice President over the Smithsonian Institution. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14253 on March 27, 2025, directing federal agencies to remove exhibits, programs, and historical narratives from museums and monuments that the order characterizes as "divisive" or promoting "ideology" rather than "objective facts." The order specifically targets the Smithsonian Institution, directing the Vice President to work through his role on the Smithsonian Board of Regents to remove what the order calls "improper ideology." It instructs the Secretary of the Interior to audit and reinstate pre-2020 monuments and ensure all federal historical sites focus on "greatness" and "achievements" rather than narratives the order deems disparaging. Future appropriations are to be conditioned on prohibiting exhibits that "divide Americans based on race" or are "inconsistent with Federal law and policy."
• Trump issues executive order directing federal agencies to remove "ideological" content from Smithsonian Institution and federal historical sites — President Trump signed an executive order on March 27, 2025, directing the Vice President, OMB Director, and Secretary of the Interior to remove what the order characterizes as "divisive, race-centered ideology" from the Smithsonian Institution, Independence National Historical Park, and other federal historical sites. The order mandates restoration of pre-2020 monuments and memorials, prohibits future federal funding for exhibits deemed to "degrade shared American values" or "divide Americans based on race," and requires the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum to exclude recognition of transgender athletes. The order frames this as restoring "truth" and "sanity" to American history.
• Trump administration issues executive orders targeting law firms; two firms sue to block — The Trump administration issued executive orders halting business with five law firms (Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Paul Weiss, Covington & Burling, Perkins Coie) and revoking security clearances of their attorneys, citing retaliation for the firms' representation of political opponents or employment of Trump critics. On Friday, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale filed federal lawsuits in Washington DC seeking to block the orders as unconstitutional. Perkins Coie had already successfully convinced a judge to block its order. Paul Weiss and Skadden reached settlements with the administration to avoid or withdraw orders.

Supporting reports

• Trump claims Biden's pardons are invalid — Trump declared that pardons issued by President Biden to members of the January 6 Committee are invalid, claiming they were signed by autopen and thus void. This assertion challenges the legitimacy of presidential pardon powers and could lead to legal and political conflicts over the scope of executive authority.
• Trump declared Biden pardons void — On Truth Social, Trump declared that the pardons issued by President Joe Biden in mid-January are "void, vacant and of no further force or effect," claiming they were signed with autopen. The pardons included members of Congress on the Jan. 6 Select Committee, Gen. Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and Biden's family members.
• Trump claims Biden's pardons are void — Donald Trump claimed that pardons signed by President Joe Biden were "void, vacant and of no further force and effect" because they were signed with an autopen. Trump made this claim on his social media platform and reiterated it to reporters on Air Force One. The claim follows a report by the Heritage Foundation criticizing Biden's use of the autopen. However, historical precedent and legal interpretations suggest that the method of signing does not invalidate presidential pardons. Biden had issued pre-emptive pardons to family members and members of the House committee investigating the January 6 attack.
• Trump declares Biden's pardons void — President Donald Trump declared the presidential pardons issued by his predecessor, President Joe Biden, "VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT." This statement implies a belief that he can unilaterally alter the legal status of pardons, which is not supported by the Constitution.
• Trump Declares Biden's Pardons Void — President Donald Trump declared the presidential pardons issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden, as “VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT.” This statement suggests an intention to investigate members of the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack, challenging the legal standing of presidential pardons.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration invokes Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport Venezuelan migrants — The Trump administration issued a proclamation on March 15 invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a wartime law permitting deportation of foreign nationals during wars or "invasions," to deport Venezuelan migrants accused of membership in Tren de Aragua gang. The administration claimed gang activities constitute an invasion justifying use of the 225-year-old war powers statute. Hundreds of Venezuelan men, including individuals with no apparent gang affiliations, were deported to El Salvador without immigration hearings, with at least one 23-year-old gay makeup artist shipped to a notorious prison based on misinterpreted tattoos.
• Trump administration deported alleged gang members to El Salvador — On March 15, 2025, President Trump signed a proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang to El Salvador without due process. Approximately 200 individuals were flown from Texas to San Salvador, despite a federal judge's order to halt the flights. The deportees were sent to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Reports indicate that many of those deported may not be gang members, with tattoos being used as the primary evidence of gang affiliation. The legality of the deportation under the Alien Enemies Act is disputed.
• Deportation of 230+ Venezuelan men to El Salvador without hearing using Alien Enemies Act — The US deported more than 230 Venezuelan men to a mega-prison in El Salvador in mid-March without a hearing, despite a federal judge attempting to halt the flights. Donald Trump invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act (AEA), a law meant only for wartime, to avoid due process requirements. This prompted court challenges led by the ACLU. Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked the president when he threatened the judge. The Supreme Court majority did not stop Trump from using the AEA but unanimously reaffirmed the right to due process and habeas corpus challenges. Most of the men are reportedly not violent criminals or gang members, according to a New York Times investigation. Many were accused of gang membership based on tattoos.
• Trump administration files emergency appeals on birthright citizenship — The Trump administration filed a series of emergency appeals asking the Supreme Court to allow the president to proceed with plans to end birthright citizenship. This legal maneuver seeks to challenge the constitutional guarantee of citizenship by birth.
• Trump invoked Alien Enemies Act to arrest and deport noncitizens without due process — Trump invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, claiming to target Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua but with implications for countless noncitizens lacking ties to the gang. US District Judge James Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting deportations under the act and ordering planes to turn around. The Trump administration defied the order; three planes landed in El Salvador, and more than 135 of 300 migrants were deported using the act.
• Trump administration invokes Alien Enemies Act for deportations — The Trump administration invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify deportations without due process, circumventing immigration courts. This act has historically been used only during wartime. Critics argue this move undermines legal protections for migrants and asylum seekers, raising concerns about executive overreach and the erosion of due process rights.
• Trump administration plans to invoke Alien Enemies Act — The Trump administration is planning to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used wartime authority, to arrest and deport certain noncitizens without due process. This act was historically used to justify Japanese internment during World War II.

Supporting reports

• White House issues promotional fact sheet claiming 50 achievements in first 50 days — The White House published a fact sheet titled "50 WINS IN 50 DAYS: President Trump Delivers for Americans" on March 10, 2025, listing claimed accomplishments across border enforcement, tariffs, investment announcements, energy policy, military recruitment, government reorganization, and regulatory rollbacks. The document attributes specific outcomes to executive actions, including border crossing reductions, tariff implementations, private-sector investment commitments, energy policy reversals, and personnel changes. No new instruments are announced; the fact sheet restates and promotes previously issued orders and policies.

Supporting reports

• Trump fires FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter — President Trump moved to fire Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic FTC commissioner, before her term was set to expire in 2029. The firing was made without cause, citing only policy differences. Slaughter was one of two Democratic commissioners Trump sought to remove from the consumer protection and antitrust agency. The move drew criticism from Democratic senators and antimonopoly groups who viewed it as an attempt to eliminate internal opposition to corporate interests within the agency.
• Trump fires Rebecca Slaughter from Federal Trade Commission — In March 2025, President Trump fired Rebecca Slaughter, the last remaining Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission, claiming her continued service was "inconsistent with [the] Administration's priorities." Although Trump had initially appointed Slaughter, he asserted the right to remove her under Article II of the Constitution, despite Congress having structured the FTC position to shield it from presidential politics. This action became the predicate for the Slaughter v. Trump case, which the Supreme Court decided in Trump's favor on June 29, 2026.
• Trump administration fires Rebecca Slaughter from FTC; she files lawsuit challenging termination — In March 2025, President Trump fired Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic FTC commissioner appointed in 2018, via email. Slaughter and fellow Democratic commissioner Alvaro Bedoya (also fired) filed a lawsuit challenging their terminations days later. In July 2025, a federal judge reinstated Slaughter, but the Trump administration appealed. In September 2025, the Supreme Court allowed Trump to remove Slaughter while the case proceeded, signaling the Court's intent to overturn Humphrey's Executor.
• Trump fired FTC member Rebecca Slaughter citing inconsistency with administration priorities — In March 2025, Trump fired Rebecca Slaughter, the last remaining Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission, claiming her continued service was "inconsistent with [the] Administration's priorities." Although Trump himself had initially appointed Slaughter, he asserted the right to remove her under Article II of the Constitution despite Congress establishing the FTC position to be shielded from presidential politics. Since 1935, the Supreme Court has held that presidents may fire independent agency members only for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." Trump's action invokes the "unitary executive" theory to expand presidential removal power over independent agencies.

Supporting reports

• Trump announced plan to sell US citizenship — Former President Donald Trump announced a plan to sell US citizenship for $5 million through a "Trump Gold Card," which would provide green card privileges and a pathway to citizenship. This proposal has raised concerns about the commodification of citizenship and potential implications for immigration policy.
• Trump proposes $5 million "gold card" for citizenship — President Trump announced a proposal for a "gold card" costing $5 million that would provide a route to citizenship. This proposal raises concerns about the commodification of citizenship and potential favoritism towards wealthy individuals.

Supporting reports

• Trump plans to disband USPS governing board — Reports indicate that Trump is planning to disband the governing board of the United States Postal Service (USPS) by executive order, aiming to place the USPS under the control of his Commerce Secretary. This move has sparked significant controversy, with critics arguing it undermines the USPS's independence and legality as established by Congress.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order on Deregulatory Initiative — President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14219, directing federal agencies to review and potentially rescind regulations deemed unconstitutional or overly burdensome. The order aims to reduce federal overreach and restore constitutional separation of powers by prioritizing the deconstruction of the administrative state. Agencies must identify regulations that exceed statutory authority or impose significant costs without public benefits, and report findings to the Office of Management and Budget within 60 days.
• Executive Order to Reduce Federal Bureaucracy — President Donald Trump issued an executive order on February 19, 2025, aimed at reducing the size of the federal bureaucracy. The order targets non-statutory components of several governmental entities, including the Presidio Trust and the United States Institute of Peace, for elimination. It mandates these entities to minimize their statutory functions and personnel to the extent required by law. The order also calls for the termination of specific Federal Advisory Committees and revokes a 1961 Presidential Memorandum related to government coordination. The Office of Management and Budget is tasked with rejecting inconsistent funding requests.
• Trump issues executive order on deregulation — President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative" on February 19, 2025. The order directs agency heads to review and potentially rescind regulations deemed unconstitutional or not in the national interest. It emphasizes reducing federal overreach and restoring constitutional separation of powers. Agencies are instructed to prioritize reviewing significant regulatory actions and to de-prioritize enforcement of regulations that exceed statutory authority. The order aims to streamline government operations and reduce regulatory burdens on private enterprises.
• White House issued fact sheet promoting executive order on regulatory review and DOGE implementation — The White House published a fact sheet on February 19, 2025, promoting an executive order signed the same day. The order directs agency heads, in coordination with DOGE team leads and OMB, to review regulations for consistency with law and Trump Administration policy, prioritize rules imposing heavy costs for rescission or modification, and use enforcement discretion to de-prioritize actions stretching statutory authority. The fact sheet claims the Biden Administration imposed $1.7 trillion in regulatory costs and characterizes the order as reversing "regulatory overreach and abusive enforcement."
• White House signed executive order directing agencies to review and rescind regulations deemed unconstitutional or contrary to administration policy — The White House issued an executive order titled "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency' Regulatory Initiative" on February 19, 2025. The order directs all federal agencies to review regulations within 60 days and identify those deemed unconstitutional, based on unlawful delegations of power, inconsistent with statutory authority, or imposing costs exceeding public benefits. Agencies must de-prioritize enforcement of regulations the administration deems unlawful and terminate enforcement proceedings deemed non-compliant with law or administration policy. The order establishes a process coordinated through "DOGE Team Leads" and the Office of Management and Budget to rescind or modify identified regulations.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order on Agency Accountability — President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14215, mandating increased presidential supervision over independent regulatory agencies. The order requires these agencies to submit significant regulatory actions for review by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) and establishes performance standards for agency heads. It aims to enhance accountability and ensure alignment with presidential policies.
• Trump issues executive order to ensure accountability for all agencies — President Donald Trump issued an executive order on February 18, 2025, to enhance accountability across federal agencies, including independent regulatory agencies. The order modifies Executive Order 12866, requiring these agencies to submit proposed rules to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for significance determination. This move aims to increase presidential oversight and ensure that all executive actions align with the President's policies and priorities. The order excludes the Federal Reserve's monetary policy activities but includes its regulatory functions over financial institutions.
• White House issued executive order subordinating independent regulatory agencies to presidential control — The White House issued an executive order titled "Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies" directing all executive departments and agencies, including independent regulatory agencies, to submit proposed and final significant regulatory actions to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for presidential review before publication. The order establishes performance standards for independent agency heads, grants OMB authority to adjust agency apportionments to advance presidential priorities, requires independent agencies to establish White House Liaison positions, and declares that presidential and Attorney General interpretations of law are controlling on all executive branch employees.
• White House issued fact sheet promoting executive order subordinating independent agencies to presidential control — The White House published a fact sheet on February 18, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump that day. The order asserts that all executive power vests in the President under Article II, requiring all federal agencies—including those statutorily designated as independent (FTC, FCC, SEC)—to submit draft regulations for White House review, consult on priorities, and accept White House-set performance standards. The fact sheet states the order exempts only the Federal Reserve's monetary policy functions and directs OMB to adjust agency apportionments. It claims the President and Attorney General will interpret law for the executive branch, displacing separate agency interpretations.
• Trump signs executive order on regulatory agencies — President Trump signed an executive order granting the White House and the attorney general direct authority over independent regulatory agencies. The order allows the president to provide authoritative interpretations of law for the executive branch, centralizing power and potentially undermining agency independence.
• Trump signed executive order making independent regulators accountable to White House — On February 19, 2025, Trump signed an executive order making independent regulatory agencies—including the SEC and FTC—accountable to the White House. Agencies must report new policy priorities to the executive branch for approval, which also gains control over their budgets. The White House claimed the order ensures agencies are "accountable to the American people, as required by the constitution," though experts say it clashes with mainstream constitutional interpretation.
• Trump signs order making independent regulators answerable to White House — Donald Trump signed an executive order requiring independent regulatory agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), to report their policy priorities to the White House for approval. This order also gives the executive branch a say over their budgets. The move is seen as an attempt to centralize power within the presidency and is expected to face legal challenges. The order exempts the Federal Reserve's authority over monetary policy but applies to other major agencies, including those regulating Wall Street and telecommunications.
• Trump expands independent regulators’ power — Donald Trump signed an executive order extending his power over independent regulatory agencies, making them accountable to the White House. This move has been criticized by some experts as conflicting with mainstream interpretations of the constitution, potentially undermining the independence of these agencies established by Congress.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order on Foreign Relations Policy Implementation — President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14211, mandating that all U.S. foreign policy be implemented under the President's direction. The order empowers the Secretary of State to reform the Foreign Service to ensure compliance with the President's policies, including personnel actions for non-compliance. The order emphasizes the Secretary's discretion in implementing these reforms.
• Trump administration claimed constitutional authority over foreign affairs in executive order — On February 12, 2025, the Trump administration issued an executive order in which Trump claimed the Constitution "vests the power to conduct foreign policy in the President of the United States." This assertion was made in the context of expanding presidential authority over foreign affairs and domestic immigration enforcement.
• Trump issues executive order on foreign relations — President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled "One Voice for America’s Foreign Relations" on February 12, 2025. The order mandates that all officers and employees involved in implementing U.S. foreign policy must do so under the President's direction and authority. It emphasizes the role of the Secretary of State in maintaining a workforce committed to the President's foreign policy agenda. The order outlines reforms in recruiting, performance evaluation, and retention standards within the Foreign Service to ensure alignment with the President's policies.
• White House issued executive order centralizing foreign policy personnel authority under the Secretary of State — The White House issued an executive order titled "One Voice for America's Foreign Relations" on February 12, 2025. The order asserts that Article II vests foreign policy power in the President and directs that all officers and employees implementing U.S. foreign policy must do so under presidential direction. It grants the Secretary of State sole and exclusive discretion to determine personnel actions, including discipline and separation, for Foreign Service members, Civil Service employees, and other staff. The order mandates reform of Foreign Service recruiting, evaluation, retention, and training to ensure "faithful implementation" of the President's foreign policy agenda.
• White House issues fact sheet on executive order centralizing foreign policy authority under the President — The White House published a fact sheet on February 12, 2025, describing an executive order signed by President Trump that establishes centralized control over U.S. foreign relations. The order reaffirms presidential authority over foreign policy implementation, reasserts the Secretary of State's authority over Foreign Service Officers, directs reform of foreign service recruiting and performance standards, and empowers the Secretary of State to revise the Foreign Affairs Manual and procedural documents. The fact sheet states the order ensures diplomatic actions align with the President's directives and that personnel are held accountable to the President's vision.

Supporting reports

• Trump suggests undermining U.S. debt — President Trump indicated that his administration might not honor U.S. debt obligations, suggesting that there may be fraud in Treasury bonds. This statement raises significant constitutional concerns regarding the validity of public debt as outlined in the Fourteenth Amendment.
• Trump suggests halting U.S. Treasury bond payments — President Trump declared that payments on some U.S. Treasury bonds might have to be halted due to irregularities in the payment systems being examined by DOGE. This announcement caused a temporary panic in the markets, although the situation calmed after Trump's administration walked back the comments. The potential halt in bond payments represents a significant risk to U.S. financial stability and credibility.

Supporting reports

• Trump administration froze federal spending — The Trump administration ordered a freeze on trillions of dollars in federal spending, which disrupted Medicaid payments, childcare programs, meals for seniors, housing subsidies, and special education programs. This action was criticized for violating the Constitution and the 1974 Impoundment Control Act. The freeze was temporarily blocked by a federal district court judge in Washington DC, Loren AliKhan, and was rescinded by the administration two days later amid confusion and criticism.
• White House rescinds memo on federal fund freeze — The White House has rescinded a memo that announced a freeze on federal funds, following public backlash. The freeze was deemed unconstitutional and part of a broader strategy to withhold funds distributed by Congress. The reversal is seen as a victory for those advocating for adherence to constitutional processes and the proper allocation of federal resources.
• Trump rescinds federal grants and loans freeze — President Trump rescinded an order that froze federal grants, loans, and financial assistance after widespread confusion and outcry. The initial freeze threatened to disrupt significant federal spending relied upon by local governments, schools, and police departments. The reversal highlights the chaotic nature of policy rollouts under Trump's administration.

Supporting reports

• Trump attempts to strike down birthright citizenship — President Trump attempted to strike down the constitutional right of citizenship for anyone born in the United States. This move challenges the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. The attempt has sparked significant legal and political debate, as it represents a fundamental shift in the interpretation of constitutional rights.

Supporting reports

• Trump orders opening of migrant detention center at Guantánamo Bay — President Donald Trump signed an executive order to prepare a detention facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to house up to 30,000 immigrants deported from the United States. The order directs the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security to expand the Migrant Operations Center at the naval base to full capacity. This move is part of Trump's broader immigration crackdown, which includes other executive orders aimed at reducing immigration and enhancing border security.
• White House issues memorandum directing expansion of migrant detention at Guantanamo Bay — The White House issued a presidential memorandum on January 29, 2025, directing the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security to expand the Migrant Operations Center at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay to full capacity. The memorandum states the expansion is to provide detention space for "high-priority criminal aliens unlawfully present in the United States" and to address immigration enforcement needs. The stated purpose is to "halt the border invasion, dismantle criminal cartels, and restore national sovereignty."
• Trump signs executive order on Guantanamo Bay migrant facility — President Trump signed an executive order directing the Pentagon and DHS to prepare a migrant detention facility at Guantanamo Bay for up to 30,000 people. This order raises concerns about the treatment and rights of migrants detained in such facilities.
• Trump signed executive order preparing Guantánamo Bay detention facility for migrants — On January 29, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to prepare a massive detention facility at Guantánamo Bay to hold up to 30,000 deported immigrants. Trump stated Guantánamo could "detain the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people" during the signing of the Laken Riley Act. The order is part of broader efforts to fulfill Trump's promise to remove millions of people from the country.
• Trump announces migrant facility at Gitmo — President Trump announced an executive order to prepare a 30,000-person migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This move aims to double the capacity for detaining migrants and is unprecedented in U.S. history. The decision has raised significant legal and ethical questions about the treatment of migrants and the use of military facilities for immigration enforcement.
• Trump announces plan to detain migrants at Guantánamo Bay — President Donald Trump announced plans to send tens of thousands of undocumented migrants to a new facility at the Guantánamo Bay naval base. This move is part of his "mass deportation" campaign, aiming to house "criminal illegal aliens" in a 30,000-person facility. The announcement has sparked significant controversy, with critics arguing it demonizes migrants by associating them with terrorism. The plan involves expanding the existing detention center, notorious for its history of human rights abuses, to accommodate the migrants.
• Trump administration announces executive order for migrant detention center — President Trump announced an executive order to open a 30,000-person-capacity migrant detention center at Guantanamo Bay, aimed at detaining what he described as the "worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people." This move is part of his broader immigration policy strategy.
• Trump announces executive order for migrant detention center — President Trump announced plans to sign an executive order to establish a 30,000-person-capacity migrant detention center at Guantanamo Bay, aimed at detaining what he described as "the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people." This move is part of his administration's ongoing focus on immigration enforcement.
• Trump orders migrant detention center at Guantánamo Bay — Trump signed an executive order to prepare a huge detention facility at Guantánamo Bay that he said could be used to hold up to 30,000 immigrants deported from the US. Trump stated Guantánamo could "detain the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people" during the signing of the Laken Riley Act. The order is part of a broader effort to fulfill Trump's promise to remove millions of people from the country.
• Plan to deport undocumented people to Guantanamo announced — A plan was announced to deport undocumented individuals to Guantanamo Bay, a location known for its lack of legal oversight and history of inhumane conditions. This proposal has been criticized as an attempt to avoid legal scrutiny and has raised significant human rights concerns. Legal challenges are expected as the plan is seen as a violation of constitutional and international human rights standards.

Supporting reports

• Rep. Andy Ogles introduces bill to amend 22nd Amendment — Representative Andy Ogles (R-TN) introduced a bill to amend the 22nd Amendment to allow former President Donald Trump to run for a third term. The proposed amendment specifies that no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms. The bill is worded to exclude former President Barack Obama from running again.
• Rep. Ogles introduces resolution for third Trump term — On January 23, 2025, Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) introduced a resolution in the House to amend the Constitution to allow President Trump to serve a third term. This proposal has sparked significant controversy and debate about the limits of presidential terms and the potential erosion of democratic norms.

Supporting reports

• Executive Order on Border Security — President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14165 on January 20, 2025, directing the deployment of physical barriers and personnel to secure the U.S. southern border. The order mandates the resumption of the Migrant Protection Protocols, adjustments to parole policies, and prioritization of prosecuting border-related offenses. It aims to deter illegal immigration and enhance border security through various measures, including international cooperation and DNA identification requirements.
• National emergency declared at southern border — President Donald J. Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border of the United States, citing threats from cartels, criminal gangs, and illicit narcotics. The proclamation authorizes the use of the Armed Forces to support the Department of Homeland Security in securing the border, including constructing additional physical barriers and deploying personnel. The proclamation revokes a previous termination of the emergency and requires reports on actions taken and conditions at the border.
• President Trump declares a national energy emergency — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14156, declaring a national energy emergency. The order directs federal agencies to use emergency authorities to enhance domestic energy production, transportation, and infrastructure. It aims to address high energy prices and vulnerabilities in energy supply, particularly in the Northeast and West Coast regions. The order invokes the National Emergencies Act and the Defense Production Act to expedite energy-related projects and infrastructure improvements.
• Presidential Proclamation on Border Security — President Donald J. Trump issued a proclamation declaring an ongoing invasion at the southern border of the United States. The proclamation suspends the entry of aliens involved in this invasion and imposes restrictions on their access to immigration provisions. The President directed the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, to take actions necessary to repel and remove aliens engaged in the invasion.
• Trump declares national border emergency — On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order declaring a national emergency at the US-Mexico border. This order allows for the deployment of US troops to the southern border to assist the Department of Homeland Security in controlling immigration. The declaration is part of a series of executive orders aimed at cracking down on immigration and unauthorized border crossings, despite a recent decrease in such crossings. The move has sparked controversy and is expected to face legal challenges.
• Trump declares national emergency at southern border — President Trump signed a national emergency declaration concerning the southern border, framing foreigners as national security threats. This declaration is part of a series of executive orders aimed at restricting immigration and increasing border security. The emergency declaration allows for the use of military resources to enforce border control and aims to achieve "complete operational control" of the border, defined as zero unlawful entries.
• Trump declares national energy emergency — On his first day back in office, Donald Trump declared a national energy emergency, allowing his administration to expedite permits for new fossil fuel infrastructure. This declaration is part of a broader agenda to increase oil and gas production, including lifting restrictions on drilling in Alaska and resuming liquefied natural gas exports. The move is expected to face legal challenges due to questions about the legitimacy of the emergency. The declaration aims to boost national security and job creation by increasing natural resource production.
• Trump declares national energy emergency to bypass environmental permitting rules — On his first day back in office (January 2025), Trump declared a national "energy emergency" to accelerate permitting for oil and gas projects and override environmental regulations. The declaration claimed to address a purported energy crisis, though the U.S. produces more oil and gas than any other nation. Fifteen Democratic state attorneys general sued to halt the declaration, arguing it unlawfully bypassed normal permitting procedures and endangered natural resources and drinking water standards.
• Trump declared emergency at southern border and requested Insurrection Act advice — When Trump declared an emergency at the southern border on January 20, he ordered the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security to advise him whether they thought it necessary to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act. That act allows a president during times of civil unrest to use the military against U.S. citizens. The article notes that this action, combined with the administration's apparent willingness to deport people without due process, has raised alarm among Americans about the potential invocation of the Insurrection Act.
• Executive Order Clarifying Military's Role in Border Protection — On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order clarifying the military's role in protecting the territorial integrity of the United States. The order directs the Secretary of Defense to revise the Unified Command Plan, assigning the United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) the mission to secure the borders against unlawful mass migration, narcotics trafficking, and other criminal activities. The order emphasizes the military's role in maintaining national sovereignty and security along the borders, citing a national emergency at the southern border.
• Trump Declares National Energy Emergency — On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order declaring a national energy emergency. The order directs federal agencies to utilize emergency authorities to enhance the identification, leasing, production, transportation, refining, and generation of domestic energy resources. It emphasizes the need for a reliable and diversified energy supply to support national security and economic stability. The order also calls for expedited infrastructure projects and emergency regulations to address energy supply issues, particularly in the Northeast and West Coast regions of the United States.
• Trump issues executive order to secure U.S. borders — On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled "Securing Our Borders." The order mandates the construction of physical barriers and deployment of personnel along the southern border to achieve complete operational control. It also calls for the resumption of the Migrant Protection Protocols, adjustments to parole policies, and increased cooperation with state and local law enforcement. The order aims to deter illegal immigration, prioritize the prosecution of border-related offenses, and enhance international cooperation to secure the border.
• President Trump declared a national energy emergency under the National Emergencies Act — President Trump signed an executive order on January 20, 2025, declaring a national energy emergency. The order directs federal agencies to use all available lawful authorities—including emergency powers under the Defense Production Act and eminent domain—to accelerate energy identification, leasing, production, transportation, refining, and generation on federal lands. It instructs agencies to expedite infrastructure projects, invoke emergency permitting under the Clean Water Act, and apply emergency consultation procedures under the Endangered Species Act to facilitate energy development. The order establishes quarterly convening of the Endangered Species Act Committee to review exemption applications and identify regulatory obstacles to energy infrastructure.
• Trump declares national emergency at southern border and invokes military deployment authority — President Trump issued a proclamation declaring a national emergency at the southern border, invoking the National Emergencies Act and directing the Secretary of Defense to deploy Armed Forces units, including the Ready Reserve and National Guard, to support Department of Homeland Security operations. The proclamation authorizes construction of additional physical barriers, directs waiver of FAA and FCC regulations for unmanned systems within 5 miles of the border, and requires revision of use-of-force policies. It revokes the prior emergency termination proclamation and directs reports within 30 and 90 days, the latter to include recommendations on invoking the Insurrection Act.
• Trump issued proclamation declaring southern border "invasion" and suspending entry of migrants — President Trump signed a proclamation on January 20, 2025, declaring the southern border situation an "invasion" under Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution. The proclamation suspends physical entry of aliens "engaged in the invasion" across the southern border, restricts their access to asylum provisions (Section 208 of the INA), and directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to "repel, repatriate, or remove" such aliens. The order applies to aliens who fail to provide medical, criminal history, or background information before entry. Trump asserts inherent constitutional authority to take these actions independent of statutory immigration law.
• Trump declared national emergency at southern border — On January 20, 2025, President Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border, allowing federal funds to be used to build a border wall without Congressional approval. This declaration is part of Trump's ongoing efforts to enhance border security and control immigration. The move bypasses legislative oversight and has sparked legal and political challenges.
• Executive Order on Military's Role in Border Protection — On January 20, 2025, Trump signed an executive order declaring an emergency at the southern US border along with several immigration-related policies. Trump stated in his inauguration speech "All illegal entry will immediately be halted, and we will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places from which they came." The declaration paves the way to send US troops to the border and fulfills campaign promises for hardline immigration policies. Immigrant communities have braced for Trump's promised "largest deportation program in American history."
• White House signed executive order assigning military border enforcement mission to USNORTHCOM — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14167, clarifying the military's role in protecting U.S. territorial integrity. The order directs the Secretary of Defense to revise the Unified Command Plan, assigning USNORTHCOM the mission to secure borders against unlawful migration and criminal activities. The order emphasizes the military's role in maintaining national sovereignty and security along the southern border.
• Trump declares national emergency at US-Mexico border — The White House signed an executive order on January 20, 2025, directing the Secretary of Defense to revise the Unified Command Plan within 10 days to assign U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) a mission to "seal the borders" and repel what the order characterizes as "forms of invasion" including unlawful mass migration, narcotics trafficking, and human smuggling. The order also directs USNORTHCOM to develop contingency and campaign plans for steady-state southern border security operations.
• Trump plans to declare border emergency — President Donald Trump signed an executive order declaring a national emergency at the southern US border. This action is part of a series of hardline immigration policies, including plans to deploy US troops to the border and initiate mass deportations.
• President Trump signs executive order declaring national emergency at southern border — President Trump declared a national emergency at the US-Mexico border, citing the need to halt illegal entry and return undocumented migrants. This declaration is part of a broader immigration crackdown and includes designating criminal cartels as "foreign terrorist organizations." The move is expected to lead to increased military presence at the border.
• Trump to deploy troops to US-Mexico border — President Donald Trump declared a national energy emergency, allowing his administration to fast-track permits for new fossil fuel infrastructure. This declaration is part of a broader effort to roll back climate policies and promote fossil fuel production. The order is likely to face legal challenges due to its environmental implications.
• Trump sends troops to southern border — Donald Trump plans to declare a national emergency at the US border, using Title 42 to trigger public health emergency powers similar to those used during the Covid pandemic. This declaration aims to prevent migrants from entering or staying in the country. However, this approach faces a significant hurdle as only the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can declare such emergencies.
• Department of Defense orders military personnel to the border — President Trump signed an executive order on January 22, 2025, invoking the National Emergencies Act regarding the southern border. The order directs the Secretary of Defense to deploy additional Armed Forces and National Guard personnel to the border, and instructs the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to complete the border wall and expand air mission flexibility. The fact sheet characterizes the action as a response to what it claims are record illegal immigration encounters and associated harms.
• Trump declares national emergency at the southern border — The Pentagon is preparing to deploy up to 1,500 active-duty troops to the US-Mexico border as part of President Donald Trump's new immigration enforcement strategy. This move is part of a series of executive actions targeting immigration, including the suspension of the refugee resettlement program. The deployment, authorized by acting defense secretary Robert Salesses, will add to the 2,500 army reserve and national guard soldiers already supporting federal law enforcement at the border. The exact role of the troops remains unclear, but the deployment marks a significant militarization of the border.
• Trump deploys military to southern border — The Trump administration deployed 1,000 soldiers and 500 Marines to the southern U.S. border. The Marines were redirected from California, where they were on standby for wildfire threats. This deployment is being treated as a military operation, with troops armed and prepared for engagement. The move comes despite border crossings being at their lowest in over four years.
• — The Department of Defense announced the deployment of 1,500 active-duty military personnel to the southern border, joining an existing contingent of 2,500 troops. This deployment is part of Trump's directive to make homeland security a core mission of the agency, which includes providing support for deportations.
• — President Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border, despite lower border crossings compared to previous years. He directed the Defense Department and Homeland Security to consider invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow military deployment to suppress domestic unrest. This declaration follows his push to eliminate a bipartisan immigration measure aimed at expediting asylum hearings.
• — Acting Secretary of Defense Robert Salesses announced the deployment of 1,500 active-duty military personnel to the southern border of the United States, joining 2,500 already present. This action follows Trump's declaration of a national emergency at the border and raises concerns about the militarization of domestic issues.

Supporting reports

• Presidential Pardons and Commutations for January 6 Offenses — The President issued a proclamation granting pardons and commuting sentences for individuals convicted of offenses related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol events. The proclamation commutes sentences to time served for specific individuals and grants full pardons to others. The Attorney General is directed to issue certificates of pardon and ensure the release of those currently imprisoned. Pending indictments related to the events are to be dismissed with prejudice.
• Biden commutes life sentence of Leonard Peltier — President Joe Biden commuted the life sentence of Leonard Peltier, an Indigenous activist convicted of the 1975 murder of two FBI agents. Peltier, who is 80 years old and in poor health, will serve the remainder of his sentence in home confinement. The commutation was supported by various groups, including Tribal Nations and human rights organizations, due to Peltier's age, health, and the length of his imprisonment. Peltier has maintained his innocence, and his case has been criticized for prosecutorial misconduct and withheld evidence.
• Biden issues last-minute pardons — Former President Joe Biden issued last-minute pardons to several individuals, including family members, former officials, and members of the January 6 Capitol attack investigative committee. The pardons were intended to protect these individuals from potential retribution by the incoming administration of Donald Trump. Biden emphasized that the pardons should not be seen as an admission of guilt. The move has sparked criticism from both political sides, with concerns about the implications of preemptive pardons and their potential to undermine the rule of law.
• Biden issues pre-emptive pardons to politicians and family members — On the last day of his presidency, Joe Biden issued pre-emptive pardons to several politicians, public servants, and family members. This included figures like Anthony Fauci, Mark Milley, Liz Cheney, and Adam Kinzinger, as well as members of the House committee that investigated the January 6 Capitol attack. Biden's family members, including his brothers and sister, were also pardoned. The pardons were issued to protect these individuals from potential "revenge" prosecutions by the incoming Trump administration.
• Trump issued over 1,600 clemency acts since second term, bypassing standard review process; at least a dozen beneficiaries arrested for subsequent crimes — President Trump has granted clemency to more than 1,600 people since taking office in his second term, most for January 6 Capitol rioters, without following the traditional Justice Department review process. Legal experts note that at least a dozen clemency recipients have been arrested for separate crimes after their release, including individuals convicted of child exploitation, burglary, theft, and assault. Trump reportedly bypassed the Office of the Pardon Attorney review, issuing 1,500 pardons on his first day in office. Experts argue this approach undermines the rule of law and signals to recipients that their original conduct was acceptable.
• Trump issues 1,500 pardons over January 6 attack — On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump issued "full, complete and unconditional" presidential pardons for approximately 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack. This action fulfilled a campaign promise made by Trump during his second presidential term. The pardons included individuals convicted of violent acts during the insurrection. Trump also commuted sentences for more than a dozen cases and directed the Department of Justice to dismiss all pending indictments related to the January 6 events. The move has been criticized by democracy advocacy groups as an affront to the rule of law.
• Trump issues mass pardons and commutations for January 6 Capitol attack defendants — On January 20, 2025, President Trump granted "full, complete and unconditional" pardons to approximately 1,500 people charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack, including those convicted of violent acts. He also issued sentence-shortening commutations for more than a dozen cases and directed the Department of Justice to dismiss all pending indictments related to the attack. Former Capitol attack prosecutor Greg Rosen resigned and criticized the pardons as sending "a terrible message" that political violence toward political goals is acceptable in a democratic society.
• Trump pardoned January 6 attackers — On January 20, Donald Trump issued unconditional pardons to 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol attack, including Emily Hernandez. Hernandez had previously served 30 days in federal prison for her role in the attack. The pardons were part of Trump's actions at the start of his second presidency. This clemency has been criticized for potentially encouraging violence in support of Trump, as noted by California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff.
• Trump pardoned January 6 rioters — On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump, after retaking the presidency, issued a mass clemency for over 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol attack, including Matthew Huttle. This act of clemency was criticized by various groups, including the Fraternal Order of Police, who argued that such pardons undermine the rule of law and public safety. The pardons have led to further legal issues for some of the recipients, including Huttle, who was later involved in a fatal encounter with law enforcement.
• Trump pardons January 6 insurrectionists — President Donald Trump issued pardons, commuted sentences, or dismissed cases for over 1,500 individuals charged with crimes related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack. This sweeping action included more than 250 people convicted of assault charges, some of whom attacked police officers. The pardons have sparked controversy, with some Republican senators condemning the move, while others have supported it. Police unions expressed disappointment, and the pardons are seen as a loyalty test for the Republican party.
• Trump pardons January 6 rioter Andrew Taake — On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump announced and signed pardons for individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the US Capitol. This decision was made during his inauguration ceremony and was part of a broader set of executive actions aimed at reversing Biden-era policies. The pardons were presented as a gesture of support for those Trump referred to as "J6 hostages," conflating them with other hostages held abroad.
• Trump pardons January 6 rioters — Former President Donald Trump issued a pardon for Andrew Taake, a convicted participant in the January 6 Capitol attack, at the start of his second presidency. Taake had been sentenced to prison for assaulting police officers during the insurrection. Despite the pardon, Taake faced unresolved charges related to soliciting a minor, which were filed before the Capitol attack. His release from federal prison was part of a controversial blanket pardon for 1,500 individuals involved in the insurrection.
• Trump signs executive orders pardoning January 6 convicts — On January 20, 2025, Donald Trump, upon retaking the presidency, issued blanket pardons or commutations to 1,500 individuals charged or convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. This decision has faced bipartisan criticism, particularly from law enforcement organizations, for undermining accountability and the rule of law. The pardons were a key campaign promise by Trump during his bid to return to the Oval Office. The Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Chiefs of Police have publicly condemned the pardons.
• Trump pardoned Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and commuted Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes's sentence — On his first day back in office, President Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders, including granting full pardons to approximately 1,500 individuals convicted of charges related to the January 6 Capitol attack. This move was part of a broader set of actions taken by Trump to assert control over the federal government and reshape the executive branch according to his agenda. The pardons were issued during a signing ceremony at the US Capitol, marking a significant and controversial use of presidential power.
• Trump issued pardons and commutations for Capitol insurrection participants — Upon taking office in 2025, Trump pardoned Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, who had been sentenced to 22 years in prison for his role in the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack intended to overturn the 2020 election results. Trump also commuted the sentence of Oath Keepers leader Stewart Rhodes to time served, releasing him from prison after Rhodes had been sentenced to 18 years for his role in the same attack.
• Trump issued proclamation commuting sentences and pardoning January 6 Capitol riot participants — On his first day as president, Trump issued sweeping pardons and commutations for individuals involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection. In the presidential action, Trump characterized the pardons and commutations as ending "a grave national injustice," effectively reversing criminal accountability for participants in the violent attack on the Capitol building that disrupted the peaceful transfer of power.
• Trump pardons Jan. 6 rioters — President Trump issued a proclamation on January 20, 2025, commuting the sentences of 14 individuals convicted of offenses related to the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot to time served, and granting full pardons to all other individuals convicted of offenses related to those events. The proclamation directs the Attorney General to issue certificates of pardon immediately, release all such individuals from prison, and pursue dismissal with prejudice of all pending indictments related to January 6 conduct.
• Approximately 1,500 January 6 defendants pardoned or commuted at start of 2025 term — On January 20, 2025, President Trump pardoned more than 1,200 convicted Jan. 6 rioters, including the leader of the Proud Boys, and commuted the sentence of the leader of the Oath Keepers. He also directed the Justice Department to drop 300 pending cases related to the 2021 insurrection. These actions have been criticized for undermining the rule of law and accountability for the insurrection.
• Trump commuted sentences of Proud Boys and Oathkeepers leaders — The Trump administration pardoned or commuted approximately 1,500 defendants charged or convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack, including high-profile leaders convicted of seditious conspiracy. The action occurred at the start of the 2025 term and was documented through reporting roundups and case coverage.
• Trump commuted sentences of Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht — Donald Trump commuted the sentences of leaders from the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers, as well as individuals involved in violent acts against police officers during the January 6th Capitol riot. This decision has sparked significant backlash from law enforcement and political figures, who view it as undermining the rule of law and justice for those who attacked officers.
• Trump issued pardons and commutations for January 6 defendants — Donald Trump commuted the two life sentences of Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the Silk Road dark web marketplace. Ulbricht's platform was known for facilitating illegal drug transactions globally. The commutation of his sentence raises concerns about the message it sends regarding cybercrime and drug trafficking.
• Trump issues pardons for January 6 defendants — On January 20, 2025, Trump issued pardons for offenders and commutations related to the January 6 Capitol attack. Trump directed the DOJ to dismiss cases currently in progress. Trump stated he pardoned approximately 1,500 defendants charged in the January 6 attack and issued six commutations. Trump made pardoning January 6 defendants a core campaign promise, featuring prisoners singing the national anthem at rallies. DOJ investigations into January 6 crimes are expected to cease.
• Trump plans mass pardons for January 6 defendants — President Donald Trump issued pardons for approximately 1,500 individuals charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack. He also directed the Department of Justice to dismiss ongoing cases. This action fulfills a campaign promise and is expected to halt federal investigations into the events of January 6.
• Trump signs executive orders pardoning January 6 rioters — Donald Trump has promised to begin reviewing cases for pardons of January 6 defendants within the first nine minutes of his presidency. With over 1,580 defendants charged and 1,270 convicted, this could represent one of the largest mass pardons in American history. Many potential recipients have already completed their sentences, making some pardons largely symbolic.
• Trump pardons Enrique Tarrio for January 6 role — Donald Trump, in his second term as US president, signed executive orders granting "full, complete and unconditional" pardons to approximately 1,500 individuals convicted of crimes related to the January 6 attack on Congress. This includes rightwing extremists convicted of seditious conspiracy. The pardons were part of a series of executive actions taken by Trump upon his return to the White House. The move has been criticized as an insult to the justice system and those who defended the Capitol.
• Trump grants full pardon to Andrew Zabavsky for January 6 Capitol riot convictions — Former President Donald Trump issued pardons for individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection. This decision has been met with criticism from law enforcement organizations, including the Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Chiefs of Police, who argue that it undermines accountability and could embolden future acts of violence against law enforcement.
• Trump grants full pardon to Terence Sutton for January 6 convictions — Former President Donald Trump pardoned Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys, for his involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot. Tarrio, who was released from prison on January 22, 2025, expressed gratitude to Trump, stating that the pardon "literally gave me my life back." Tarrio's release and pardon have emboldened far-right militia groups, who are now regrouping and planning their next steps. The pardons have sparked concern among law enforcement officers who were involved in the January 6 cases, fearing for their safety.
• Trump issues pardon for DC police officers — President Donald Trump commuted the sentences of or pardoned all individuals convicted of crimes related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. This action was met with mixed reactions, including disapproval from some Republican lawmakers and the D.C. Police Union, which expressed dismay over the pardons. The move signals Trump's intent to support his base while undermining the judicial system's accountability efforts.
• Executive Order on AI Leadership — President Trump issued an executive grant of clemency on January 22, 2025, granting Andrew Zabavsky a full and unconditional pardon for convictions in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Zabavsky was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy) and § 1512 (obstruction), sentenced on September 12, 2024, to 48 months imprisonment on each count (concurrent), 3 years supervised release, and a $200 special assessment. The pardon nullifies the sentence and conviction.
• Trump issued pardons for January 6 participants — President Trump issued an executive grant of clemency on January 22, 2025, granting a full and unconditional pardon to Terence Sutton. Sutton had been convicted in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on charges including violations of D.C. Code § 2103, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy), and 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (obstruction of justice). He was sentenced on September 12, 2024, to concurrent sentences totaling 66 months imprisonment, 3 years supervised release, and a $300 special assessment. The pardon erases the conviction and sentence.
• Trump issues pardons for January 6 participants — President Trump issued a "full and unconditional pardon" on January 22, 2025, to two DC police officers involved in the death of 20-year-old Karon Hylton-Brown. This action has sparked controversy and raised concerns about accountability and the message it sends regarding police conduct.
• Trump issues pardons for January 6 rioters — President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14179 on January 23, 2025, to remove barriers to American leadership in artificial intelligence (AI). The order revokes existing AI policies that hinder innovation and mandates the development of an action plan to sustain and enhance U.S. global AI dominance. It also requires a review and potential revision of policies inconsistent with this new directive.
• — Former President Donald Trump issued "full, complete and unconditional" pardons for 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. This move has been met with mixed reactions, with some praising the decision while others, like Pamela Hemphill, have refused to accept the pardon. Hemphill, who was arrested for her involvement in the attack, insists on taking responsibility for her actions and plans to file a letter of rejection for the pardon.
• — Former President Donald Trump issued pardons to over 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection, including those convicted of assaulting police officers. The pardons were criticized by federal judges, who described them as based on a "revisionist myth" and incapable of erasing the violence and terror of the event. The pardons have caused division within the Republican Party, with some members supporting the move and others, like Mitch McConnell, condemning it. The pardons were issued as one of Trump's first acts upon taking office.
• — Trump decided to pardon or commute the sentences of all individuals convicted for their involvement in the January 6 riots, including those who attacked police officers. This decision has sparked controversy and concern, particularly from law enforcement groups and victims of the riots. Critics argue that this undermines the rule of law and public safety. Jackson Reffitt, a key witness against his father, expressed fear for his safety now that his father is free.
• — President Donald Trump, in an interview, defended his pardons for January 6 rioters, downplaying the violence against police officers during the Capitol attack. Approximately 600 rioters faced charges related to assaulting law enforcement, with ten convicted of sedition. Trump's actions have drawn criticism from federal judges who emphasize the importance of maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. The pardons have sparked discussions among pardoned rioters about running for office, indicating a potential shift in political dynamics.
• — President Donald Trump issued pardons for nearly two dozen individuals convicted in connection with the January 6 Capitol riot, claiming the violence against police was minor. This action has drawn criticism from federal judges and has implications for ongoing legal proceedings against other defendants. U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly emphasized that pardons do not alter the historical record of the events of January 6.

Supporting reports

• Trump issues executive order directing DOJ not to enforce TikTok ban — On his first day in office, President Trump issued an executive order instructing the Department of Justice not to enforce the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACAA), a bipartisan law passed by Congress requiring ByteDance to divest TikTok or face a ban in the U.S. The order effectively suspended enforcement of the congressionally mandated ban, allowing the app to remain available to American users despite ByteDance's failure to comply with the divestment deadline.
• Executive Order suspends enforcement of TikTok-related Act — President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14166, instructing the Attorney General to suspend enforcement of the Protecting Americans From Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act concerning TikTok for 75 days. This pause allows the administration to assess national security concerns and negotiate a resolution. The order prevents the Department of Justice from imposing penalties for noncompliance during this period and asserts the Executive's exclusive enforcement authority.
• Trump orders DOJ to pause TikTok ban enforcement — President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Department of Justice to halt enforcement of a federal law banning TikTok in the United States for 75 days. Trump justified this decision by stating that TikTok was popular among young voters who supported him, and he no longer considered it a national security threat. This order reflects Trump's approach to leveraging executive power to influence regulatory actions based on political considerations.
• Executive Order Delays Enforcement of TikTok Restrictions — On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order delaying the enforcement of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act as it applies to TikTok. The order instructs the Attorney General not to enforce the Act for 75 days, allowing the administration time to assess national security concerns and negotiate a resolution. This delay aims to prevent an abrupt shutdown of TikTok, a platform used by 170 million Americans, while addressing potential security risks associated with its China-based parent company, ByteDance Ltd.
• President Trump issued executive order delaying enforcement of TikTok ban for 75 days — President Trump signed an executive order on January 20, 2025, instructing the Attorney General to suspend enforcement of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act for 75 days. The order prohibits the Department of Justice from taking action against TikTok or other entities for noncompliance during this period and retroactively shields providers from liability for conduct occurring from January 19, 2025, onward. The administration states it will use this time to consult on national security concerns and pursue a negotiated resolution.
• Trump delays TikTok ban — On January 20, 2025, President Trump delayed the TikTok ban by 75 days, ignoring a Congressional statute and a Supreme Court ruling. This decision has raised questions about the administration's adherence to legal processes and the separation of powers. The delay affects the ongoing debate over data privacy and national security concerns related to the app.