Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• US House blocks extension of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) section 702 — The US House of Representatives failed to pass a short-term extension of FISA section 702 in a 198-218 vote on June 11, 2026. Democrats blocked the renewal in protest of Trump's appointment of Bill Pulte, a major Republican donor with no national security experience, as acting director of national intelligence. The law will lapse on June 12, though a FISA court certification allows collection to continue under existing orders through approximately March 2027.
• House rejected FISA renewal measure — Nineteen Republicans joined all but seven Democrats to reject a measure to extend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which expires on June 12, 2026. Under the fast-track procedure used by House Speaker Mike Johnson, the measure required a two-thirds majority but failed 218 to 198, not reaching even a simple majority. The rejection reflected concerns about Pulte's potential oversight of the program.
• Congress fails to reauthorize Section 702 of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act before deadline — Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which permits warrantless collection of communications involving foreigners outside the US and incidentally sweeps up American communications, was set to expire on June 12, 2026. Congress failed to reauthorize it by the deadline. House Speaker Mike Johnson blocked votes on reform amendments, particularly a warrant requirement for surveilling Americans' communications, refusing to allow longer extensions that included such reforms. The program continues operating under existing court certifications through March 2027, but the statutory authorization lapsed.
• Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act lapses — The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which grants the executive branch broad surveillance powers, lapsed on June 12 after Congress failed to pass a short-term extension. The lapse occurred amid Senate outrage over Pulte's potential appointment as acting DNI. Some Republicans attempted to pass a two-week extension, but their efforts failed.

Supporting reports

• House reauthorized Section 702 FISA surveillance powers for three years — The House of Representatives passed a three-year reauthorization of Section 702 of FISA on Wednesday by a vote of 235–191. The program permits U.S. intelligence agencies to intercept communications of foreign nationals abroad without a warrant, but data of Americans communicating with those targets is swept up incidentally, and the FBI can search that data without a court order. Civil liberties advocates have sought a warrant requirement for nearly two decades, which was not included in the bill. House leaders attached an unrelated ban on central bank digital currency to secure conservative votes; Senate Majority Leader Thune has called this provision a nonstarter.
• Congress passes a 10-day extension of Section 702 — Congress has passed a short-term 10-day extension of Section 702, a surveillance law that allows the government to collect communications. The extension is set to expire on April 30, 2026. The debate continues over whether to renew the law with reforms, such as a warrant requirement for searches involving Americans' data and closing the data broker loophole. The Senate is also considering a separate three-year FISA extension bill, keeping the issue active this week.
• Senate Republicans proposed three-year extension of Section 702 surveillance authority without reforms — Senate Majority Leader John Thune scheduled a vote on a bill to extend Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act for three years, until April 2029, without substantive reforms. Both Democrats and Republicans have expressed concern that the system for collecting information on foreign threats can sweep in U.S. citizens and enable warrantless government surveillance. The House has attempted to negotiate cosmetic reforms, but if those negotiations fail, Thune plans to pass a three-year extension with no reforms, removing Congress's ability to revisit and strengthen constitutional safeguards for three years.

Supporting reports

• Attorney General Bondi testified before House Judiciary Committee and refused to answer questions about Epstein co-conspirators — Attorney General Pam Bondi testified before the House Judiciary Committee on February 11, 2026. When asked by Congressman Nadler how many of Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirators had been indicted and how many perpetrators were being investigated, Bondi did not answer directly. Instead, she attacked members of Congress throughout the hearing. When Congresswoman Jayapal asked survivors of Epstein's crimes to stand if they had not met with the Department of Justice, all survivors present raised their hands. Jayapal then asked Bondi to turn and apologize to the survivors; Bondi refused to acknowledge them and instead attacked Democrats over past impeachment proceedings.
• Pam Bondi testified before House Judiciary Committee on Epstein files handling — Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Judiciary Committee to address her handling of Epstein-related documents and redactions. Her testimony drew intense criticism from Democratic lawmakers and observers who alleged she was covering up information, lying under oath, and that the DOJ had improperly surveilled members of Congress reviewing the files. Multiple representatives and senators called for her impeachment or resignation, citing her conduct as unprofessional and her role in withholding documents and redacting victim information.
• Attorney General Bondi refused to release Epstein files to public as required by law — Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Judiciary Committee but refused to release all Epstein files to the public as Congress required when it passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Bondi did not acknowledge survivors of Epstein's sexual assaults and sex trafficking who were present in the audience. When Representative Pramila Jayapal urged her to apologize to survivors for the sloppiness of the release that left many survivors' names, identifying information, and sexually explicit photos unredacted while covering perpetrators' names, Bondi accused Jayapal of theatrics and dragging the hearing "into the gutter."
• Pam Bondi defends DOJ Epstein file handling in heated House judiciary committee hearing — US Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House judiciary committee on Wednesday to defend the Department of Justice's handling of files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Democrats questioned the DOJ's compliance with a law mandating complete release of the files, citing concerns about released survivor names and unexplained redactions of names of potential crime perpetrators. Bondi avoided substantive answers, instead attacking and insulting Democratic questioners, calling one a "washed-up loser lawyer" and refusing to apologize to Epstein victims present in the hearing room.
• DOJ Refuses to Release Epstein Files to Congress — The Department of Justice (DOJ) did not comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which required the release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Judiciary Committee but did not provide satisfactory answers regarding the withheld documents, which has raised concerns about transparency and accountability in the administration.

Supporting reports

• DOJ established controlled in-person review system for congressional Epstein files access — The Department of Justice opened an in-person review facility in Washington on February 9, 2026, allowing members of Congress to search unredacted Epstein records under tight controls on access and note-taking. This was the sole mechanism established for congressional review of unredacted files following passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act in late 2025, which required DOJ to release unclassified Epstein-related records. The DOJ controlled all variables of the review process, including which files could be accessed, how searches were conducted, and what records were kept of congressional activity.
• DOJ tracked congressional searches in Epstein files review system — Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared at a House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on February 11, 2026, carrying a printed document labeled "Jayapal Pramila Search History" that detailed Rep. Pramila Jayapal's searches within the DOJ's controlled, members-only review system for unredacted Epstein records. A Reuters photographer captured the document. The DOJ had established the in-person review system on February 9, 2026, as the sole mechanism for congressional access to unredacted Epstein files under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The revelation suggests the DOJ monitored lawmakers' investigative activity and used that intelligence during the oversight hearing itself.
• DOJ surveilled House member's access to Epstein files — During Attorney General Bondi's testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, a photograph captured by Reuters showed a page of Bondi's briefing book with a printout titled "Jayapal Pramila Search History," appearing to be files showing what Representative Pramila Jayapal accessed after the DOJ made some Epstein files available at DOJ offices. This represents executive branch surveillance of a legislative branch member's document access. Representative Jamie Raskin, top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said he will ask for an investigation of this "outrageous abuse of power."
• Ranking Member Raskin requested DOJ Inspector General investigation into congressional surveillance — House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin formally requested that the DOJ Inspector General investigate the DOJ's apparent surveillance of lawmakers' searches in the Epstein files review system. Raskin stated he had "reason to believe that it was happening to everyone," not just Rep. Jayapal. He also called for the DOJ to immediately stop tracking member searches, open Epstein file review to senior congressional staff, and publicly release all remaining files with only survivor information properly redacted.
• Rep. Jayapal organized formal congressional letter demanding investigation into surveillance — Rep. Pramila Jayapal organized a formal congressional letter demanding an investigation into what she characterized as improper surveillance of Congress by the DOJ. Jayapal also raised the question of whether the DOJ's decision to open the Epstein files to congressional review two days early was intended to allow the DOJ to surveil members' searches and anticipate their questions for the oversight hearing.
• DOJ tracked congressional members' Epstein files research and displayed search records at hearing — During a House oversight hearing on Wednesday, US Attorney General Pam Bondi displayed a document titled "Jayapal Pramila Search History" showing which Epstein files Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal had accessed. The DOJ confirmed it monitors all Epstein file searches by lawmakers on its systems. Congressional members, including Jamie Raskin and Jayapal, alleged the tracking violates separation of powers and constitutes surveillance designed to anticipate questions and gather intelligence on their investigative activities.
• DOJ surveilled Congress members' search history of Epstein files — Multiple members of Congress confirmed that the Department of Justice tracked and monitored which Epstein documents members of Congress searched, opened, and reviewed, including timestamps. Rep. Pramila Jayapal reported that AG Bondi presented her with a printed search history of her email searches. Rep. Nancy Mace confirmed the DOJ was tagging all documents searched by members and that timestamps were associated with the tracking. Speaker Mike Johnson stated he was investigating the allegations.
• DOJ monitored congressional search history in Epstein files review system — Attorney General Pam Bondi carried a printed document labeled "Jayapal Pramila Search History" into a House Judiciary oversight hearing, revealing that the Department of Justice had tracked which Epstein-related files Rep. Pramila Jayapal searched within DOJ's controlled, members-only review system. The executive branch collected intelligence on the legislative branch's investigation of the executive branch. Rep. Jamie Raskin called the practice Orwellian and requested a DOJ Inspector General investigation; Rep. Jayapal is organizing a congressional letter demanding answers.
• Racist video of Obamas posted on Trump's Truth Social account — A racist video depicting the Obamas as apes appeared on President Trump's official Truth Social account. The video was removed, but Trump refused to apologize and claimed a staffer posted it without review. The incident occurred on an official presidential account.

Supporting reports

• Jamie Raskin accuses DOJ of improper redactions in Epstein files — Rep. Jamie Raskin, House Judiciary ranking member, reviewed unredacted Epstein files at a DOJ facility in Washington DC on February 9 and publicly accused the Justice Department of making "mysterious redactions" that obscured names of alleged abusers while failing to redact victims' identities. Raskin stated the redactions were either "spectacular incompetence" or a deliberate threat to survivors. He said he reviewed approximately 30–40 unredacted files and identified unnecessary redactions of public figures including Les Wexner and references to Trump. Raskin announced he would raise the issue with Attorney General Pam Bondi at her scheduled House Judiciary Committee testimony.
• House members reviewed unredacted Epstein documents revealing child victims as young as nine years old and multiple co-conspirators — Representatives including Jamie Raskin, Jared Moskowitz, and Jasmine Crockett reviewed previously redacted Epstein documents at the Department of Justice. The documents revealed evidence of victims as young as nine years old and identified numerous co-conspirators in the international child sex trafficking operation. Raskin noted unnecessary redactions beyond victim name protection and stated that a billion-dollar trafficking ring could not operate with only two perpetrators. The documents also contained references to Trump's relationship with Epstein at Mar-a-Lago that had been redacted.
• Rep. James Walkinshaw identified improperly redacted Epstein email involving Trump — Rep. James Walkinshaw reported that he reviewed Epstein file redactions and found an email from Epstein's attorneys recounting a 2009 conversation with Trump that contained no mention of victims and should not have been redacted. Walkinshaw noted there were many other inexplicable redactions in the files.
• Rep. Jamie Raskin documented severe restrictions on congressional access to Epstein files — Rep. Jamie Raskin stated that the DOJ is providing Congress with only four computers in a satellite office to review more than 3 million unredacted Epstein documents. Raskin calculated that working 40 hours per week on nothing else, it would take more than 7 years for the 217 House members who signed the discharge petition to read only the documents the DOJ has decided to release, with 3 million additional documents still being withheld.
• Rep. Ro Khanna criticized DOJ redactions of Epstein files — Rep. Ro Khanna stated on MSNBC that the Epstein files released by the DOJ had already been scrubbed by Trump's FBI in March 2025 before being provided to Congress. Khanna alleged that the DOJ is protecting powerful people by maintaining redactions and that the vast majority of documents containing survivor statements remain unredacted, preventing full accountability for crimes.
• Rep. Thomas Massie revealed DOJ unredacted co-conspirator identities in Epstein files — Rep. Thomas Massie reported that in response to his social media posts, the DOJ unredacted FBI files labeling two individuals as co-conspirators in child sex trafficking, unredacted files listing men who might be implicated, and tacitly admitted that Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem sent a torture video to Epstein. Massie noted that FBI's own 2019 document listed Wexner as a coconspirator, information not previously unredacted, and that no one knew the sender of the torture video until he obtained the unredacted email.
• Attorney General Bondi refused to release Epstein files to public as required by law — Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Judiciary Committee but refused to release all Epstein files to the public as Congress required when it passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Bondi did not acknowledge survivors of Epstein's sexual assaults and sex trafficking who were present in the audience. When Representative Pramila Jayapal urged her to apologize to survivors for the sloppiness of the release that left many survivors' names, identifying information, and sexually explicit photos unredacted while covering perpetrators' names, Bondi accused Jayapal of theatrics and dragging the hearing "into the gutter."
• National Parks Foundation agreed to keep Freedom 250 donors anonymous — A representative for the National Parks Foundation, which is serving as the legal vehicle for Freedom 250, told a Congressional committee that it would keep donors anonymous upon request. This arrangement allows major corporations to fund partisan political advocacy through a nonprofit structure while maintaining donor confidentiality.

Supporting reports

• Senator Slotkin said she is under federal investigation — Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) said in an interview that federal prosecutors are investigating her for participating in a video with other Democratic lawmakers calling on military members to refuse illegal orders.
• DOJ threatens Federal Reserve with criminal indictment over interest rate policy — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell publicly stated that the Department of Justice threatened criminal charges against the Fed related to a multi-year renovation project of Federal Reserve office buildings. Powell characterized the threat as retaliation for the Fed's decision to set interest rates based on economic conditions rather than presidential preference, stating the threat was "a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President."
• Federal investigation opened against Michigan senator Elissa Slotkin for video urging troops to refuse illegal orders — Michigan senator Elissa Slotkin announced she is under federal investigation by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia for her participation in a video released in 2025 in which she and five other Democratic lawmakers with military backgrounds urged U.S. troops to refuse unlawful orders. The video's message aligns with established military law and constitutional principle. President Trump called the video "seditious behavior by traitors" punishable by death; the White House later clarified he did not seek execution but wanted them "held accountable." Slotkin characterized the investigation as weaponization of federal government to intimidate political opponents.
• Senator Elissa Slotkin faces federal criminal investigation for oath video — Senator Elissa Slotkin is now under federal criminal investigation for appearing in a video urging service members to remember their oath and refuse illegal orders. The investigation represents potential criminalization of speech encouraging military personnel to uphold constitutional obligations and refuse unlawful commands.
• Four additional Democratic lawmakers said they are under investigation — Four additional Democratic lawmakers said they are being investigated by the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia over their participation in a viral video calling on military members to refuse illegal orders.
• Trump DOJ investigates Democratic lawmakers over military video on illegal orders — Three House Democrats—Jason Crow (Colorado), Maggie Goodlander (New Hampshire), and Chrissy Houlahan (Pennsylvania)—confirmed that the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C., led by Jeanine Pirro, requested interviews regarding their participation in a November video instructing troops they need not comply with illegal orders. The investigation expands to five lawmakers total; the Pentagon also formally censured Senator Mark Kelly and launched administrative proceedings. Trump called the video "seditious" and threatened capital punishment, later walking back but maintaining the lawmakers face "serious jeopardy."

Supporting reports

• DHS imposes one-week advance notice requirement for congressional detention facility visits — The Department of Homeland Security implemented a policy requiring members of Congress and their staff to provide seven days' advance notice before visiting ICE detention facilities. Democratic lawmakers filed suit challenging the requirement as unconstitutional, arguing it violates federal law that explicitly permits members of Congress to enter DHS facilities "for the purpose of conducting oversight" without restriction. The policy effectively prevents unannounced inspections that would reveal actual daily conditions rather than prepared presentations.
• Democratic lawmakers file constitutional lawsuit challenging DHS visitation policy — Twelve Democratic members of Congress filed suit against the Trump administration challenging the DHS policy requiring one week's advance notice for congressional oversight visits to ICE detention facilities. The lawsuit argues the requirement is unconstitutional and unlawfully restricts their oversight authority under federal law, which explicitly prohibits the government from preventing members of Congress from entering DHS facilities for oversight purposes. The plaintiffs include Representatives Jason Crow and others who have been denied access.

Supporting reports

• Senator Jon Ossoff's office releases report documenting human rights abuses in ICE detention centers — Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff's office released a report compiled in part from congressional site visits documenting widespread human rights abuses in immigrant detention centers, including mistreatment of pregnant women and children. The report specifically noted that "Obstruction of Congressional oversight by the Department of Homeland Security has been an impediment to site visits and interviews with detainees." The DHS responded by calling the allegations "garbage" and denying that Ossoff's staff had ever been denied oversight access.

Supporting reports

• Senator Jon Ossoff investigation documented medical neglect in ICE detention — An investigation by Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) identified 85 credible reports of medical neglect among ICE detainees between January 20 and August 5, 2025. The incidents included a heart attack after days of untreated chest pain, complications from untreated diabetes, and denial of necessary medications and associated complications. The investigation predates the October 3, 2025 payment halt but documents a pattern of medical neglect that the article indicates has "almost certainly become much worse" following the cessation of third-party provider payments.
• Senator Ossoff's office releases report documenting 510 credible human rights abuses at ICE detention facilities — Senator Jon Ossoff's office released a report documenting 510 credible cases of human rights abuses at US Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers since Trump's January 2025 inauguration. Alleged abuses include deaths in custody, physical and sexual abuse, mistreatment of pregnant women and children, inadequate medical care, overcrowding, unsanitary conditions, denial of legal access, and child separation. The report accuses the Department of Homeland Security of obstructing congressional oversight and limiting access to detention sites. DHS denied the allegations.

Supporting reports

• ICE raids two California cannabis farms with chemical munitions deployed against protesters — Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, accompanied by National Guard troops in military vehicles, conducted raids on two Glass House Farms locations in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties on July 10. Federal agents fired chemical munitions (smoke/tear gas) to disperse protesters gathered on roads near the farms. Video showed children fleeing, workers being detained with bound hands, and local officials including U.S. Representative Salud Carbajal being denied entry to observe the operation. At least three people were transported to hospitals. The company stated it fully complied with search warrants.
• ICE raids on cannabis farms used tear gas and less-lethal ammunition; disabled veteran U.S. citizen arrested — On July 10, 2025, ICE agents conducted raids on two licensed cannabis farms in Southern California. Agents deployed less-lethal ammunition and tear gas, injuring multiple people, one critically. Agents arrested 200 people, including George Retes, a 25-year-old disabled veteran and U.S. citizen employed as a security guard at one farm. ICE agents claimed Retes was a protester. His family reported that local sheriff and police departments stated they do not know his whereabouts.
• Detainees denied legal access and confidential attorney communication — Immigration attorneys reported being denied access to the Everglades detention facility to meet with clients and unable to have confidential phone calls with detainees. This denial of legal access prevents detainees from receiving counsel regarding their cases and violates fundamental due-process protections, particularly significant given that nearly half of ICE detainees lack criminal records.
• George Retes, U.S. Army veteran, detained and held without legal process for three days — On July 10, 2025, George Retes, a 25-year-old U.S. Army veteran, was detained by federal agents while traveling to work as a security guard at a Southern California cannabis farm. Despite identifying himself as a U.S. citizen with identification in his nearby car, Retes was violently arrested, held in a jail cell for three days and nights, and denied the right to make a phone call, see an attorney, appear before a judge, or access basic hygiene after being exposed to pepper spray and tear gas.
• Farm worker dies from injuries sustained during ICE raid on California cannabis farm — Jaime Alanís, 57, a farm worker at Glass House Farms in Ventura County, California, died from catastrophic injuries after falling approximately 30 feet from a greenhouse roof during a Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement raid on July 11, 2025. The raid resulted in the arrest of at least 200 workers suspected of being in the country without legal status. Alanís called his family saying he was hiding and fleeing agents before the fall. He sustained a broken neck, fractured skull, and severed artery. DHS stated he was not in custody when he fell, though the raid created the circumstances leading to his death.

Supporting reports

• VP Vance expressed disagreement with Yemen military operation in Signal chat — Vice President JD Vance texted concerns about the planned Houthi military operation in a Signal group chat, stating "I think we are making a mistake" and noting that only 3% of U.S. trade and 40% of European trade runs through the Suez Canal, suggesting the public may not understand the necessity of the operation. Secretary Hegseth responded by defending the operation as necessary to restore freedom of navigation and reestablish deterrence, citing risks of leaks and Israeli action if delayed.
• Secretary of Defense Hegseth shared classified military operational details via unsecured Signal messaging — Jeffrey Goldberg reported in The Atlantic that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth texted him classified war plans for missile strikes against Houthis in Yemen approximately two hours before the operation commenced. Hegseth's message, sent at 11:44 a.m., included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing. Goldberg was subsequently added to a Signal group chat called "Houthi PC small group" with 18 senior officials including VP JD Vance, NSA Mike Waltz, DNI Tulsi Gabbard, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe. The White House National Security Council confirmed the incident occurred but characterized it as an "inadvertent" addition to the chain.
• Trump administration discussed military strike on Houthis via unsecure Signal app — On March 24, Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic reported that senior Trump administration officials, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, discussed a military strike on Houthis in Yemen using an unsecure commercial Signal messaging app. Hegseth posted precise details of munitions and aircraft involved. The app was configured to auto-delete messages in violation of the Presidential Records Act. Neither President Trump nor the acting Joint Chiefs chairman was included; White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller apparently made the strike decision based on his interpretation of Trump's wishes. The White House declared the matter "closed" on March 31 without investigation or resignations.
• Atlantic editor added to White House Signal group chat discussing Yemen airstrikes — The Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was added to a Signal group chat in which Trump administration officials, including Vice-President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, discussed and coordinated airstrikes against Houthis in Yemen. The breach was revealed when Goldberg published an article about it on Monday. Democratic senators interrogated intelligence officials Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe at a Senate hearing, criticizing the "sloppy, careless" handling of sensitive military operational details. The Defense Department had warned against Signal use due to Russian hacking threats.
• White House security breach: classified Yemen war plans shared via Signal with journalist — Senior Trump administration officials—including Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and others—inadvertently included Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg in a Signal group chat discussing classified military plans for US strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. Signal is not approved by the US government for classified communications. Goldberg discovered the breach, removed sensitive material including a CIA officer's identity, and published an account. The NSC confirmed the "inadvertent" inclusion; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called it "one of the most stunning breaches of military intelligence" in recent memory.
• Atlantic editor Goldberg disputes national security adviser Waltz's explanation for Signal group chat inclusion — Jeffrey Goldberg, editor of The Atlantic, publicly disputed National Security Adviser Mike Waltz's account of how Goldberg was added to a Trump administration Signal group chat discussing imminent U.S. military strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. Waltz claimed Goldberg's contact was "sucked into" his phone via another contact; Goldberg countered on NBC's Meet the Press that the explanation was implausible and that Waltz had simply mistakenly added him because his number was already in Waltz's phone. The NSC confirmed message authenticity and said it was reviewing the incident.
• Trump administration officials share sensitive military plans in leaked Signal group chat — Pete Hegseth, US defense secretary, and other Trump administration officials including Vice President JD Vance and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz discussed sensitive details of a US airstrike in Yemen in a Signal group chat. Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of the Atlantic, was mistakenly added to the chat. The Atlantic published details on 24 March, triggering controversy. A subsequent poll found 54% of registered voters and 38% of Republicans believe Hegseth should resign. Trump has declined to fire anyone involved, dismissing the incident as a "glitch."
• Jeffrey Goldberg revealed Signal group chat with classified military plans — Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, published a bombshell article revealing he had been added to a Signal group chat of senior Trump administration officials, including Cabinet members, that focused on highly-sensitive, detailed plans for military strikes in Yemen. National security adviser Mike Waltz later took "full responsibility" for the breach. The chat contained classified information about strike timings, planes, and drones.
• White House accidentally shared classified Yemen war plans via Signal group chat with journalist — Senior Trump administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, accidentally added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal group chat containing highly sensitive military plans regarding airstrikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen. The messages were set to auto-delete within four weeks, potentially violating the Federal Records Act. The White House confirmed the leak but characterized it as "deep and thoughtful policy coordination," while lawmakers from both parties condemned it as a catastrophic security breach and called for investigations.
• White House security breach: classified Yemen strike planning discussed in compromised Signal group chat — Senior Trump administration officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and others, discussed operational details of a planned military strike on Yemen in an encrypted Signal group chat. The chat was compromised when National Security Adviser Waltz invited Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to the group without authorization. Participants discussed messaging strategy, operational security concerns, and geopolitical implications. The Atlantic withheld publication of sensitive "TEAM UPDATE" material citing risk to U.S. servicemen and operations.
• White House officials' Signal chat group accidentally leaked to journalist — A journalist from The Atlantic was accidentally added to a Signal messaging group containing deliberations by 18 senior Trump administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, regarding planning for strikes on Houthis in Yemen. The leak exposed operational security failures, classified military planning details, and internal disagreements on sensitive foreign policy matters. The incident revealed use of an unapproved commercial messaging app for highly classified discussions instead of secure government facilities.
• Secretary of Defense Hegseth and senior officials planned military strikes on Yemen via unsecure Signal messaging app — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other senior administration officials discussed and planned military strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen using Signal, a commercial messaging app. National Security Advisor Waltz added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat without authorization. Hegseth uploaded precise attack details before the operation, exposing timing and targeting information. The chat was set to auto-delete messages after four weeks and was conducted on personal, unsecure devices vulnerable to foreign intelligence penetration.
• Der Spiegel reports Trump officials' private data accessible online via hacked dumps and commercial providers — German magazine Der Spiegel reported that mobile phone numbers, email addresses, and passwords belonging to US national security officials—including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard—were discoverable online through commercial data-search services and hacked data dumps. The exposure followed the officials' use of Signal to discuss sensitive military plans for airstrikes on Yemen. The NSC stated that Waltz's accounts had been changed in 2019, but the report raised concerns about potential foreign espionage during the recent classified communications.
• Mike Waltz accepts responsibility for Signal group chat leak including journalist Jeffrey Goldberg — Michael Waltz, Trump's national security adviser, claimed "full responsibility" for creating a Signal group chat that inadvertently included Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg. The group, containing Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other senior officials, discussed operational details of planned airstrikes on Houthis in Yemen. Waltz said he could not explain how Goldberg's number ended up in the chat, though he suggested the journalist may have deliberately infiltrated it. The breach exposed highly sensitive national security information and drew criticism from Senate Democrats.
• White House Signal Chat Leak Reveals Security Breach — A leak from a Signal chat involving senior Trump administration officials revealed that top-secret military plans concerning US attacks on the Houthis in Yemen were inadvertently sent to a journalist. The chat also contained disparaging remarks about European allies, highlighting a lack of secure communication practices within the administration. This breach raises concerns about the handling of sensitive information and the potential impact on global stability, as it exposes the administration's reckless approach to national security matters.
• Signal chat leak reveals classified military details shared by Trump cabinet officials — A Signal group chat used by Trump administration officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, leaked to the Atlantic, containing operational details about US military strikes in Yemen. The messages included launch times of F-18 fighter jets, bomb-drop schedules, and Tomahawk missile timelines sent before operations occurred. Despite potential violations of classification protocols, federal record-keeping laws, and the Presidential Records Act, White House officials deny the messages were classified. A watchdog lawsuit seeks to compel preservation of the messages.
• Signal group chat leak: journalist Jeffrey Goldberg accidentally added to White House national security discussion — Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, was accidentally added to a Signal group chat that included the U.S. defense secretary, White House national security adviser, and intelligence community heads discussing plans to strike Yemen. Goldberg reported on the leak, prompting administration officials including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to publicly attack him, calling him a "loser" and "deceitful" journalist. The incident raised questions about operational security and accountability within Trump's cabinet.
• The Atlantic published screenshots of classified Signal messages discussing Yemen military strikes — The Atlantic published screenshots of the Signal group chat messages in which senior administration officials discussed and planned military strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen. The messages revealed that Secretary of Defense Hegseth had uploaded precise attack details including timing and targeting information before the operation commenced. The publication followed administration officials' repeated denials that classified information had been shared, and came after The Atlantic's reporters determined there was clear public interest in disclosing the information.
• Trump national security team discusses Yemen airstrikes on Signal messaging app with journalist present — President Trump's national security team, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, conducted planning discussions about airstrikes on Houthi forces in Yemen via the Signal messaging app. Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was added to the group chat and witnessed the discussions in real time. Goldberg subsequently published an article about the incident and later released a transcript of the chat. The leak prompted bipartisan congressional concern about the handling of sensitive information on an unsecured platform known to be targeted by Russian hackers.