Trump Action Archive

Supporting reports

• White House issues fact sheet on new "Schedule G" federal employee classification — The White House issued a fact sheet on July 17, 2025, describing a new executive order signed by President Trump creating "Schedule G," a non-career federal employee classification. The order amends Civil Service Rule VI to establish positions for employees engaged in policy-making or policy-advocating work. Schedule G employees are designated as non-career, expected to leave office when the appointing President departs. The fact sheet states the classification aims to enhance government efficiency, accountability, and implementation of Administration policy, and claims it fills a gap in existing federal hiring categories.
• White House signed Executive Order 14317 creating Schedule G in the excepted service for federal employment — President Trump signed Executive Order 14317 on July 17, 2025, establishing Schedule G within the excepted service to classify noncareer federal positions of a "policy-making or policy-advocating character" as exempt from competitive civil service requirements. The order amends 5 CFR 6.2 and 6.4 to add Schedule G alongside existing excepted service schedules (A, B, C, D, E, Policy/Career). The order states that Schedule G positions are "normally subject to change as a result of a Presidential transition" and directs the Office of Personnel Management to adopt implementing regulations. It specifies that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall consider whether appointees would be "suitable exponents of the President's policies" but shall not consider political affiliation or activity.
• Trump signs Executive Order 14317 establishing Schedule G in excepted civil service for policy-making and policy-advocating positions. — President Trump signed Executive Order 14317 on July 17, 2025, creating Schedule G within the excepted service of the federal civil service. Schedule G permits noncareer appointments to positions of a policy-making or policy-advocating character that are normally subject to change upon Presidential transition. The order amends Civil Service Rule VI and 5 CFR 6.2 and 6.4 to establish this new schedule. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs is directed to consider appointees' suitability as exponents of the President's policies while disregarding political affiliation or activity. The Director of OPM shall adopt implementing regulations.
• Trump issued executive order creating Schedule G in the excepted service for noncareer policy-making and policy-advocating positions — President Trump signed an executive order on July 17, 2025, establishing Schedule G within the federal excepted service. This new schedule permits noncareer appointments to positions of a policy-making or policy-advocating character that are normally subject to change upon presidential transition. The order amends Civil Service Rule VI and exempts Schedule G positions from standard civil service removal protections, allowing the administration to appoint and remove personnel without competitive examination or standard procedural safeguards.
• Trump signs executive order creating Schedule G federal worker classification for at-will political appointees — On Thursday, Trump signed an executive order establishing Schedule G, a new classification of federal employees subject to presidential hiring and firing without civil service protections. The order targets policy-level positions across agencies, particularly the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is framed as streamlining appointments and dismantling the "deep state." The classification mirrors Schedule C (temporary policy employees) and complements Schedule F, which strips civil service protections from career federal workers. Critics argue it further politicizes the federal workforce and undermines nonpartisan government service.

Supporting reports

• House hearing on campus antisemitism featuring UC Berkeley, Georgetown, and CUNY leaders — The House of Representatives held its ninth antisemitism hearing since October 2023, questioning the leaders of UC Berkeley, Georgetown University, and the City University of New York about campus antisemitism, faculty hiring practices, diversity initiatives, and foreign funding. University leaders condemned antisemitism and described institutional measures taken. Democratic lawmakers criticized the hearing as "political theatre," noting the Trump administration's closure of civil rights enforcement offices and arguing the focus deflected from broader discrimination issues affecting other student groups.
• House Republicans hold hearing on campus antisemitism at UC Berkeley, CUNY, Georgetown — The House Republican-led committee held its ninth hearing on antisemitism in higher education, questioning the chancellors of UC Berkeley, CUNY, and Georgetown University. University leaders defended their institutions' responses to antisemitism allegations and emphasized their commitment to free speech protections. Republicans pressed the leaders on faculty discipline and foreign funding, while Democrats criticized the hearing as political theater and noted the dismantling of the Education Department's civil rights investigation capacity. The hearing was interrupted by pro-Palestinian protesters.

Supporting reports

• House hearing on campus antisemitism featuring UC Berkeley, Georgetown, and CUNY leaders — The House of Representatives held its ninth antisemitism hearing since October 2023, questioning the leaders of UC Berkeley, Georgetown University, and the City University of New York about campus antisemitism, faculty hiring practices, diversity initiatives, and foreign funding. University leaders condemned antisemitism and described institutional measures taken. Democratic lawmakers criticized the hearing as "political theatre," noting the Trump administration's closure of civil rights enforcement offices and arguing the focus deflected from broader discrimination issues affecting other student groups.
• House Republicans hold hearing on campus antisemitism at UC Berkeley, CUNY, Georgetown — The House Republican-led committee held its ninth hearing on antisemitism in higher education, questioning the chancellors of UC Berkeley, CUNY, and Georgetown University. University leaders defended their institutions' responses to antisemitism allegations and emphasized their commitment to free speech protections. Republicans pressed the leaders on faculty discipline and foreign funding, while Democrats criticized the hearing as political theater and noted the dismantling of the Education Department's civil rights investigation capacity. The hearing was interrupted by pro-Palestinian protesters.

Supporting reports

• Supreme Court grants stay on Education Department layoff order — The Supreme Court's right-wing majority granted a stay on a lower court order blocking the Trump administration from gutting the Department of Education while litigation proceeds. Federal Judge Myong Joun had ordered reinstatement of 1,378 fired workers after nineteen states and D.C. sued to stop the layoffs. The stay permits the layoffs to continue. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented, arguing the majority enabled executive defiance of law and violated separation of powers.
• Preliminary injunction ruling — Somerville Public Schools v. Trump (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10677 — The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to grant a stay of a preliminary injunction that had blocked the administration's plans to dismantle the Department of Education and fire thousands of department employees. The majority did not provide any reasoning. In dissent , Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, warned that the Court's order enables the executive branch to functionally “abolish” an entire department “by executive fiat.”
• Preliminary injunction ruling — State of New York v. McMahon (D. Mass.) 1:25-cv-10601 — The Supreme Court granted the federal government's request for a stay in the case of McMahon v. New York. This decision temporarily allows the Department of Education to proceed with a reduction in force that impacts nearly 50% of its workforce, approximately 1,378 employees. The stay was granted in a 6-3 decision, with Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting. The case was initially brought by twenty states and the District of Columbia, challenging the reduction in force as unlawful.
• Supreme Court Grants Stay in McMahon v. New York — The Supreme Court granted an emergency appeal from the Trump administration, allowing it to move forward with gutting the Department of Education by firing nearly half of the agency's workforce. The decision bypassed lower-court review and normal appellate procedures.
• Supreme Court grants emergency appeal allowing Department of Education workforce cuts

Supporting reports

• Trump administration fires 15 immigration judges — NPR reported that the Trump administration fired 15 immigration judges last week and two more on Monday, July 14, despite the GOP tax and spending bill allocating an additional $3 billion in immigration-related funding to the Justice Department, including funds to hire about 100 more immigration judges.

Supporting reports

• Homeland Security Secretary Noem imposes centralized approval requirement for FEMA expenditures over $100,000 — Kristi Noem, Homeland Security Secretary, issued a directive requiring that all FEMA expenditures or contracts worth $100,000 or more be submitted to her office for prior approval. Former officials warn this centralization of decision-making will impede rapid disaster response and may result in preventable loss of life by slowing mobilization during emergencies.
• Trump administration imposes grant cuts and spending restrictions on FEMA, degrading disaster-response capacity — The Trump administration has cut FEMA grant programs and imposed new spending restrictions, including a requirement that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem approve all expenditures over $100,000. These actions, combined with a mass staff exodus of approximately 2,000 employees since January 2025, have left the agency dangerously underresourced ahead of hurricane season. Former FEMA officials warn the agency may lack funds by month's end and cannot handle multiple concurrent disasters, potentially resulting in preventable loss of life.
• Noem diverted HHS disaster funds to immigration enforcement and advertising — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem spent $200 million on an advertising campaign promoting Trump's agenda and $21 million to transport approximately 400 migrants to Guantanamo Bay, many of whom were subsequently transferred out. Senator Chris Murphy warned in May 2025 that Noem was on track to violate the Anti-Deficiency Act by spending more money than Congress allocated, leaving the agency "broke by July, over two months before the end of the fiscal year." Noem justified the spending as fulfilling a mandate from voters for border security.